Thanks David!! This series really helps me to revise the FRM curriculum.. It is terse, yet covers all the details that should be remembered.
@bionicturtle5 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear the videos are helpful!
@CPanhchakmoni3 жыл бұрын
hope you also provide additional minutes for interpreting the coefficient as well, whether the strength is interpreted the same as Pearson or not. Thank you for a concise demonstration =D
@seannguyen32602 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. However, could you share the formula in Kendall's tau how to calculate N(C) and N(D) in your excel file please.
@sohuilee19363 жыл бұрын
You are an amazing professor!! thank you so much :)))
@h-s72182 жыл бұрын
Great video, thank you very much ! :)
@vaibhav4029385 жыл бұрын
Hi David Can you please review the Kendall explanation for pairs. Seems it is not in sync with the FRM answers
@thenivang5 жыл бұрын
Are you referring to KAPLAN material? I guess they have incorrectly calculated the types of pairs. I too have the same doubt myself.
@vaibhav4029385 жыл бұрын
@@thenivang Yes
@thenivang5 жыл бұрын
@@vaibhav402938 I saw few videos on calculation. And I think Kaplan has done some mistake w.r.t the calculation which is not yet updated in the notes.
@bionicturtle5 жыл бұрын
Mine are correct (I'm using strict matrix math), Meissner's text has an error. He has agreed with me, see explainer here www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/potential-error-in-p2-t5-mr-9-3-2-3-kendalls-tau-and-concordant-discordant-pairs.8209/
@ashutoshpandey16814 жыл бұрын
thank you sir .
@thenivang5 жыл бұрын
Hi David, Thanks for sharing the video. It was really helpful. I need your guidance on one another video w.r.t to how to calculate the number of concordant and discordant pairs. The link for the same: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pYm5qZSJpL5sas0 4:20 min onwards.. Basically what it does is Step 1: Just goes on checking from the first row of y(i) till the last one for the number of times the Ranks is larger than themselves. Step 2: Just sum all of it. And the same becomes the number of Concordant Pairs. Would you please comment on the same. Thanks once again.