Rate Law

[@mup1537]

This video was excellent. Provided in the context of mcat Q's and clear, procedural, and succinct. Deserves far more views.

[@seanoconnor311]

This was fire. When's the merch dropping?

[@e-2758]

Lifesaver. You are so concise and clear in the way you teach. Thank you!

[@tristenmelvin1855]

This freaking video is awesome. Was so confused on this topic and came back to relearn it!! Gonna be returning to this playlist

[@AlishaSlomers]

such a great explanation! thank you

[@getitdone0010]

Deserves far more views

[@LindseyDeaver]

Thank you!!

[@dreamchaser5173]

This was excellent. Thank you so much!!

[@MedSchoolCoachMCATPrep]

Glad it was helpful!

[@emilybernal4736]

thank you! this was incredible!

[@MedSchoolCoachMCATPrep]

Glad you liked it!

[@ANNALERCH]

Do you combine the rate laws of steps 1 and 2 to get an overall rate law for the entire reaction?

[@dikigurung2222]

thank you for saving my life

[@Obamnaz]

Can you do a video on the integrated rate laws please?

[@dwl2601]

When determining rate law from experiment data, do we also only use gaseous and aqueous reactants in the rate law?

[@denissemedina4619]

In that case it does not matter.

[@carinaashcraft1627]

Best explanation

[@misaestudiando]

Do the trials you pick to determine rate always have to be next each other? For e.g. lets say Trial A has x2 change between trial 1 & 3, and Trial B & C remain unchanged. Because there was a "jump" would it still be okay to calculate reaction order with those values?

[@MedSchoolCoachMCATPrep]

Nope, you can always pick any two trials to work with!

[@rachel39321]

At the end you wrote/said that reaction order is the stoiciometric coefficients but that is not actually the case. even it happens to be the same number occasionally, they are not related.

[@diannenewcomb9781]

Yes. The rate order usually isn't the coefficients. Rate order aka exponents need to be determined experimentally.