Ray-Ban Aviator Reverse Review - HOT GARBAGE

Ray-Ban Aviator Reverse on face Review
►Buy here: bit.ly/RayBanAviatorReverse
Also on or website here: www.shadereviewstore.com/sear...
Shade Review Official Store: www.ShadeReviewStore.com
Our Affiliate shops:
Amazon Store Front ► amzn.to/2FuElyG
Maui Jim Store ► bit.ly/BuyMauiJimSunGlassesHere
Persol Store ► bit.ly/OfficialPersolOnlineStore
Randolph Store ► bit.ly/RandolphSunShop
---------------------------
Follow me:
/ shadereview
/ shadereview
---------------
Gear I use:
► Canon EOS R6 (My 4K Camera) amzn.to/34z0sNq
► Sigma 18-35mm F1.8- amzn.to/39LZgHZ
►Canon RF 24-70 F2.8 (My favorite lens) amzn.to/377VE3Y
►MacBook Pro 16 inch amzn.to/341ldC4
►Rode VideoMic Pro+ amzn.to/315QGB9
►Manfrotto Fluid Video Tripod- amzn.to/1PAn5mh
Subscribe Here:
goo.gl/ZVYhF9
Disclaimer & Full Disclosure: We are a participant in the Amazon Associates Program, So If you purchase something from our affiliate links will get a small commission with no extra cost to you. This makes it possible for us to keep producing VIDEOS!
°We NEVER collect, store, use, or have access to any data about you.

[@minorperez5998]

I don't think they look that bad, the lenses look more connected to you face and like you said looks more futuristic.

[@pinchtwo654]

I want to know how Ray-Ban arrived at the conclusion these should be produced. Think of all the concept and design review meetings this had to go through before production. They, as a company, decided this was a good idea. It honestly baffles me that one of the biggest names in the eyewear industry actually decided to make this.

[@mamoonrasheed3378]

The biggest names can experiment anything

[@pinchtwo654]

@@mamoonrasheed3378 sure, the biggest names can experiment with anything, but this is obviously a bad idea. There is literally not one single optical advantage to doing this, and it didn’t have to be produced for sale to be able to see that. Anyone who understands the way light travels through a lens to the eyeball would have been able to guess this would distort the image. The fact that this made it past the prototyping stage shows that Ray-Ban is counting on their customer base to value aesthetic distinction over practical benefit. This is a marketing experiment.

[@ShadeReview]

Drugs and brain damage would be the only explanation :(

[@SlapsRUS]

Bought a pair. They aren’t bad and honestly have people at work asking about them and they think they look good too. To each their own 🤷🏽‍♂️

[@pthomas2906]

I bought a pair and I think they're great, as for blurry peripheral vision, absolutely not. They are 100% stylish and I would recommend them to anyone who likes Ray Ban. Try them, you'll see for yourself.

[@GMBXNY718]

Exactly, i have them and i love them..

[@Ndrew556]

The moment I saw these on their website I knew you were gonna flame them 😂

[@ShadeReview]

Hahaha! I tried to come in to this review open minded and give an honest review, but I didn’t have high hopes for them. Thanks for the comment Andrew

[@tiagosoares9822]

The color of the lenses are sick though could you please reply the color so i can get on an refular aviator pair.

[@luka-ty3hr]

Reverse lenses remind me of Ghostface/Scream. I wouldn't get them, but I think the Wayfarers pull off the reverse look better than Aviators. On the bright side, these might be considered a vintage quirk decades from now.

[@ShadeReview]

Wow now that you mention that I can’t unsee it 😂

[@somethingboss]

Thanks for the very honest review dude. Saved me any money I may have used purchasing these. I'm a massive fan of Aviators and after seeing your vids I recently bought the New style, beautiful quality. But these... jeeez. They seem like a cool idea but terrible in reality.

[@BLRayBanUK]

Great review. Interested why they decided to actually release these. 1st person i looked for to hear your opinion.

[@ShadeReview]

Thank man I really appreciate that! I would love it if you started uploading again, but I know you have been downsizing the collection 😎

[@halobloksmexico4980]

Even after looking at this video and some other comments saying it is trash, I got mine yesterday. Absolutely love them, they look and feel fantastic to me. There are some cons I agree with, like the ammount of light they let in, but it's not that bad, also there is a small chance that your eyelashes contact the lenses, but if I'm honest that happens to me with all glasses because I have long eyelashes, last thing is that it takes a couple minutes to get used to the optics, but after that it is perfectly fine, I was able to drive without issues. IMO, are they perfect? no. Are they for everybody? no, but they are nowhere near that bad.

[@tiagosoares9822]

Guy FYI i own 14 pairs of rayban were 6 of them are aviators, and i just bougjg yesterday the same model , that he is wearing, i avise you not to listen to him , they are quite amazing , a little lighter than the originals, but they Feel and look amazing.

[@JuneK618]

I just tried one of these today and it’s definitely not my style. It looked so flat. It felt weird having a pair of sunglasses so close to my eyeballs. It just wasn’t the most comfortable fit so I 💯 agree with this review.

[@darcyalvarez652]

Good evening bro do you have any rayban wings 2 gold frame with orange lens at your store for sale? been look all over and can't find them .

[@ShadeReview]

Unfortunately I believe those were disconnected, but I’ll look into it

[@12inch_monster]

these would be perfect with the mschf reverse sneakers

[@RyanNoffsinger]

This may have taken the top spot as my favorite video by you. I took one look at these when they were released and said “Hideous”. What was Lux or RB thinking!? Thanks for the laughs tonight!

[@ShadeReview]

Thanks Ryan! These are so awful lol

[@sgnigfplibtfesbyesw526]

Поскорее бы залететь попробовать) Постоянно смотрю твои видосы и наверное вот скоро влечу разок)

[@SKELLZ_]

Thanks for the review. I now know they won't work for me, having very wide peripheral vision myself, it would drive me crazy for the edges to be constantly blurry.

[@ShadeReview]

Definitely I believe they will not work out for most

[@hoagie1978]

They look like something went wrong during assembly and got sent out by mistake.

[@ShadeReview]

Haha yup

[@vim1471]

It's equivalent to wearing your frames upside down.

[@ShadeReview]

Even worse from an optical quality stand point

[@zirkh1609]

These are definitely meant for a fashion runway and not much else, they look really cool on the wall but as sunglasses they are terrible. Lol as a guy with somewhat long eyelashes the issue of eyelashes touching my lenses is a constant with every frame ive tried, but these reverses are on another level

[@bradgmx]

I'm working in a Ray Ban store and we sell a lot of this glasses and our customers are very happy with that 😎

[@FrancescoZOR]

So the quality is really falling down?

[@ericelectro8684]

Broo these Ray-Ban Reverse Aviators are the literal definition of They dont make em like-they used to!😂

[@ShadeReview]

Definitely 😂

[@dannyelite1]

I put these on in the store and just laughed.

[@mattb9664]

I can only imagine what the laser spot test does when shined through the lens. It's got to be a massive offset. Vote with your wallets folks and do not buy!

[@0cesarful]

Size?

[@rjzavala87]

Today, I picked up a pair of polarized aviators i ordered online at sunglass hut. The lady working there was telling me how a guy came in wanting the same outdoorsman style stallone wore in cobra. She told him that they didnt have those and that she sold him these instead. Oof. My man got got.

[@GMBXNY718]

No he didnt get got.. These are actually pretty nice. In my profile pic im wearing Versace, and ive had prada and probaby around 10 pairs of raybans and i like these glasses.

[@rjzavala87]

@@GMBXNY718 hey if you enjoy them, great. They still look weird and can just kinda throw your look off because of how goofy they look

[@GMBXNY718]

I got them.. Had plenty of pairs of other RayBans aviators, chromance... and I like these as well. .

[@gianlucaalessia5538]

Gotta say not a fan when I first saw them, super weird concept. But when on someone's face. That pure opaque mirror look, looks cool af. So ya if you like style, these are great. But if your only going to buy one pair, this isn't it. These are purely a fashion/ novelty buy. Not everyone's got 200+ to drop on that.

[@leogarciagarcia494]

Ustes no saben nada los compre y estan hermosos y se sienten fantasticos comprare todos los colores.

[@TheAnderson41011]

Was interested in buying these. Thanks for the video I don’t want to waste my money

[@zdenekleitner6312]

I just recieved a pair of New Caravan optical frames one week ago and guess what - Made in China. I'm honestly pissed, because on their official website, as well as the reputable seller from which I sourced these, there is at least one picture showing "Made in Italy" on the temple, whereas on mine, there is just nothing. For a while I thought I was scammed, but aparently this is the new standard with Ray Ban.... So disappointed by the shady marketing

[@Ndrew556]

All the optical frames are made in china, no exceptions

[@alexandruvictor9316]

@@Ndrew556 even if it says "made in Italy" on them?

[@Ndrew556]

@@alexandruvictor9316if yours say made in Italy then they were sunglasses and someone removed the lenses or they’re fake

[@raymondding5746]

Is the title going to be updated? Says Wayfarer reverse at the mo

[@ShadeReview]

Title has been updated. That’s what I get for her working on this for hours of sleep. Lol

[@raymondding5746]

@@ShadeReview Cheers. Knew this vid was coming ever since Ray Ban released the product - certainly didn't disappoint!

[@gameplaybeast2446]

can u make video of your sunglass collection

[@ShadeReview]

I’d love to but I have over 400 pairs sooooooo The video would be around 20 hours long lol

[@gameplaybeast2446]

@@ShadeReview woh that's huge collection thats great man

[@user-kc7uv3hp8v]

Мне поначалу не везло, но потом я начал смотреть твои ролики и примерно понял как тащить) спасибо

[@lipereplay]

Thanks mate, I was just about to buy this one but wasn’t sure about it. Now I’ll definitely not buy it 💪🏼

[@Elementalism]

The group kriss kross have been waiting for a pair of sunglasses like these to complete their outfit for the last 3 decades.

[@farissyed4564]

Not hot garbage at all! These shades does remarkably well in garnering complements.

[@bradleemartin6540]

This inspired me to wear gloves on my feet and shoes on my hands!

[@ShadeReview]

Someone out this man in an art museum 🫡

[@bradleemartin6540]

@@ShadeReview these aviators are equivalent to the banana taped on the wall.

[@timgingell9883]

I love mine and told they look amazing so I guess everyone has their own opinions

[@LoveRockProductions]

Interesting build indeed

[@ShadeReview]

Definitely substandard!

[@steveo8533]

I like them and they do look stylish, also they do suit you sir.

[@webby2086]

I Agree these feel more of fashion style than actual sunglasses as I would never wear these in public...seen these reveal on Sport RX channel teasing them ..saying their the next big of optical innovation n etc.. And seeing the video I just cringed of them trying to advertise them saying how they love them...compared to the comments basically saying the opposite Yeah quite innovating but an innovation that shouldn't have been done as they look ridiculous as sure companies must have thought of this idea before but didn't do them for that reason

[@ShadeReview]

Absolutely thanks for the comment, we don’t have any affiliation with Luxottica so we can be honest in our review, and call out garbage when we see it.

[@pinchtwo654]

I think my favorite part in that Sport RX video was when the optician spoke briefly the only thing he really had to say was that they can distort your vision. Then the rest of the video was just two employees trying them on talking about how good they look. They were clearly being very careful to not actually talk about the optical quality of the design. It made me lose a little respect for their channel tbh. Calling this design an innovation is equivalent to graffitiing a car and calling it a custom paint job.

[@webby2086]

@@pinchtwo654 yeah & hearing them say "never been done before":....yeah it never Been done before ...for a reason 😅 Makes you wonder if the employees actually think that about the sunglasses in the back of their minds ..if you wanna see impressive or interesting I is a company called Mariner eyewear making the 1st matte reflective lenses...that to me is interesting.. this by Ray Ban is an insult to these reverse lenses in classic like the Aviator, Caravan & Wayfarer

[@webby2086]

@@ShadeReview I know as no way the employees think this is great innovation Im thinking what that diablo fan was saying them years ago & thinking "is this an out of season April Fools joke" as these be perfect for April Fools Whoever in Ray Ban came up with this need to 'reverse ' this Idea & production of these abominations

[@pinchtwo654]

@@webby2086 I would be willing to bet an entire paycheck that the technical staff at Ray-Ban protested against this design. This strikes me as an idea that was pitched by marketing, and upper level management commanded the engineering staff to make it happen. The fact that it made it past the prototyping stage and to the production stage shows that Ray-Ban is counting on their customer base to value aesthetic distinction over practical benefit. Oh word I’ve never heard of that before. Imma have to check them out.

[@aaronth07]

My eyelashes touch the lenses on my normal Ray-Ban aviators 😂

[@whiskeyandkittens6999]

I love it.

[@attilab.2818]

I still like them, so ordered a pair. 😂 in the worse case scenario, they're just simply going back. 😅

[@ShadeReview]

Ya for sure, if you can leave us a comment after you get them, we would love to see your thoughts on them!

[@attilab.2818]

​@ShadeReview Well, I received them today, and they're quite nice actually. I expected something terrible but my first impression isn't bad at all. I ordered the 61 mm lens size and didn't experience the eyelash problems. The coverage from the top is quite decent, only on the side have a relatively big gap, but not bigger than a round style frame. Went for a short walk with these and it gave me a feeling like being in a VR game, followed by some motion sickness, lol. 😅

[@garypinha]

It’s horrible for you. Not for everybody! For me work. It’s a fashion accessory that’s right!!! 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 I love the model

[@ShadeReview]

If you personally like them that’s great! 😎 enjoy

[@CODGaming0007]

Feel like a Rayban gimmick like the curve tvs that came out years ago

[@ShadeReview]

Yes definitely haha

[@harshchandra5150]

Seems like horror glass made for ghost

[@CJ-xi1jl]

ray ban julie review please

[@AL0gonza]

¿59mm o 62mm?

[@pinchtwo654]

When I saw a different KZbin channel talk about these I thought they looked so stupid from a functionality standpoint. Thank you for confirming that I’m not going crazy and they are, in fact, stupid

[@Flossy.woo1]

Not a good buy. I love aviators but my eyelashes hit the lens and have to wipe my lens

[@davidg0101]

I’ve never seen you rant like that before!! Quality review of a crap idea!!!

[@ShadeReview]

Thanks for the comment Rato, I definitely got a little heated on this one haha

[@ThatGlassesGuy03]

😂😂😂 “this is an absurd optical idea”. Yes. Yes it is. How awful is that to wear.😂😂

[@ThatGlassesGuy03]

Ohh got there. Exactly what I would’ve expected. 😂😂😂☠️ kudos Ray Ban 😂

[@ShadeReview]

are you saying these don't get the official TGG approval? 😯

[@ThatGlassesGuy03]

@@ShadeReview 😂😂 that’s exactly what I’m saying 😂😂

[@trinieshepard7983]

i love mine.

[@devilalwayscry]

It looks great with you

[@ShadeReview]

Thanks!

[@aamirh3567]

tbh they look good on you🤷‍♂️

[@Solinvincible]

I bought them and return after 2 days these glasses are shame of the name, $20 glasses selling for $200 these glasses are joke.

[@DanBCooper]

The same people that would actually wear those are the same people that think leather is “bad for the environment”.

[@ArmandoFL]

Sending mine back

[@ShadeReview]

Lol don’t blame you

[@bc6790]

Nice guy 😍😍😍😍😍😍

[@k9feces]

Very human design

[@andresastudisho]

evolution says the contrary.

[@Nimargb]

So you don't like them!

[@Solinvincible]

They look stylish but they are disposable sunglasses.

[@andresastudisho]

dafuq happened to them. I was curious when these came out, and this is exactly what I expected. This is what happens when you try to make something "cool" by going against evolution and basic biology, that's the reason our eyeballs are convex. You are so depressed by Ray Ban that for a moment I thought I was watching a video from The spectacle factory (that guy really hates RB).

[@HenriVerhage-tf6lb]

What were they thinking? How did it get to production??? It must be one of the most unusefull sunglasses ever. People buy this crap????😮

[@georgebour]

I feel dizzy after 10 minute's. The worse sunglasses I have ever bought

[@EViLMinD76]

Thought this was a joke. yuck

[@vijeeshmenon1982]

This is so embarrassing 🥴

[@mssandeepsaini]

Sandeep

[@cristianinternationaltrade9227]

In my opinion, useless ugly design, not healthy for the eyes. I would recommend the aviator RB3625 Chromance, the polar clear gradient dark blue color silver mirror, instead of that one, so much better quality view experience I would say one of the lens Ray Ban has ever made.

[@attilab.2818]

I've just sent them back. Unfortunately only Category 2.

[@mgeasley]

garbage

[@FrenchTweacher]

Not functional, and absolutely ugly. The Croc’s of the sunglasses industry.

[@ShadeReview]

Aren’t Croc’s actually comfortable tho lol

[@0cesarful]

Size?

[@barbouille4060]

59