Want to learn industrial automation? Go here: realpars.com Want to train your team in industrial automation? Go here: realpars.com/business
@cordaxg6261 Жыл бұрын
Today i continued my education to become a Enviromental Operating technician (Water & Sewage) Today we started our course in Automation. Im a Swede with a pretty good grasp of the english language. I can tell you, these videos from a total beginners perspective, and not having english as a main/native language these videos were both easy to understand and grasp/follow. Great videos !
@realpars Жыл бұрын
That's amazing to hear! Thank you very much for sharing.
@cordaxg6261 Жыл бұрын
@@realpars likewise ! Thank you
@yungerallenelectricalcontr64152 жыл бұрын
By Far the Best Explanation for PID's I have ever had the pleasure to Learn. This is a game changer for my foundation.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome! Glad to hear that our video courses have been so helpful to you!
@lukesau272 ай бұрын
not to sound dramatic but this is the best video I have ever watched
@realpars2 ай бұрын
We're happy to hear that, Luke! Thank you for sharing
@kayakMike10002 ай бұрын
@@realpars good animations
@nyahhbinghi2 жыл бұрын
I love it when my furnace kicks in at 65º and then heats the house to 75º, that 10º fluctuation is so glorious.
@paulgaras260621 күн бұрын
Bro has a Johnson Controls a19 on his wall.
@MeltingRubberZ282 жыл бұрын
Good video. I'm an ME so I don't have to work directly on PID loops, but work in automation so I'm around them often. Back in college when we programmed them in our circuits class they had us manually use a fan to cool a resistor to a specific temperature, and then a PID loop. The precision was night and day.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @MeltingRubberZ28. Sounds like your fan/resistor activity was interesting. Was the temperature controlled by modulating the fan speed?
@MeltingRubberZ282 жыл бұрын
@@realpars yes
@keenheat33352 жыл бұрын
my college did a similar thing, but it was controlling an inverted pendulum and trying to keep it straight up while inverted. If tuned properly and the error is not large enough saturate the control gain, it can keep an object at naturally unstable equilibrium really well. Although if you have a naturally stable system, then it's even better in case there was a failure in the pid system, at least there is some backup.
@JB-ri6zp2 жыл бұрын
I'm an ME too. Do you enjoy automation? I really enjoy learning about electronics, programming, logic, and efficiency. I can spend hours reading and thinking about it. Maybe I should of done software or electrical haha
@MeltingRubberZ282 жыл бұрын
@@JB-ri6zp yeah. Job is rewarding and the pay is good.
@tbengineering7066 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. It really helps a lot. PID Controllers are such an important concept that can be very difficult to grasp at first. I'm going to recommend this video to some students at my alma mater. I think it will really help them understand what the Control Systems professors are talking about.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! Thank you very much for your kind support.
@johng52952 жыл бұрын
Thanks in a million. Great content. Awesome. Very well explained. I couldn't find this explanation--simply put anywhere else. Great teachers are hard to find. Grade: A++💥
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks a lot for your positive feedback, John!
@fifaham2 жыл бұрын
Very good refreshing - I took 6 courses in Control Systems in the University long years ago and I loved this subject a lot, I was A student in this subject doing it with Analog circuits but today I do it with microcontollers along with Analog + DigiPots and Digital Variable Capacitor along with keyboard and switches. This is amazing.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for your kind support, Firas!
@arletacostagonzalez7364 Жыл бұрын
Very good explination. Concise and easy to understand. Thank you very much.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! Happy learning
@atarperach9319 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! By far its the best explanation I have heard for PID controllers...
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@mortenlund14182 жыл бұрын
Cool of you to go here. Thanks for the effort. Great video,
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Morten!
@ricardogarcia39002 жыл бұрын
What an educative and iteresting channel. Congrats again.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it, Ricardo! We appreciate your kind feedback.
@eugenepohjola258 Жыл бұрын
Howdy. I like how RealPars focus on the essential in these tutorials. Digital controllers are usually described as summing of the P, I and D blocks. As in the clip. There are still lots of analog controllers in use. They are usually bulit using operational amplifiers. The description usually is the P, I and D in cascode or series. The math is different for summing and cascode. However. The derivative parameter Td usually is at most 1/10 of the integral parameter Ti. Usually Td is even way smaller than 1/10 of Ti. The math for both summing and cascode will be the same closely enough. Regards.
@WeconTechnology2 жыл бұрын
Very detailed video. Our Wecon PLC support PID tuning.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@ilhuihdez Жыл бұрын
Great amazing content. It really facilitates understanding of the topic. Thank you thank you thank you.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! Happy learning
@isakoqv2 жыл бұрын
Nice video, but I think it's a mistake to introduce the PID parameters without mentioning that there are different types of PID controllers. The model presented here is parallell PID, where each parameter is applied to the error separately. In the industry, another very common type instead defines a parameter called gain which is then applied to the proportional, integral and derivative parameters. The I and D parts of the PID are then usually called Integral Time and Derivative Time. If one applies the same values to these different models of PID or tries to tune it the same way as is presented here it could lead to a lot of problems.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @isakoqv. Thanks for your feedback and comments. It’s difficult to encapsulate PID details in a short KZbin video. Your comments about Gain, Integral Time, and Derivative Time are true and those terms are important. We hope to discuss those terms and more such as Reset Windup, MPR and RPM in later videos. Discussing and observing P, I, and D response to error is an interesting challenge because obviously in a dynamic environment, the error is always changing because of the controller response. As for tuning, there are lots of so-called tuning methods and as you say, not all are appropriate or advised as blanket methods for every application.
@lexsoft39692 жыл бұрын
@@realpars It was years ago when I learned Ziegler-Nichols method and Cohen-Coon for tuning a PID controller. Now, I forget all of them. I turned to become a programmer not related to Control System/Engineering. Only occasionally I want to relearn this interesting field.
@sankaranbaskar61652 жыл бұрын
@@realpars sir, is it possible to make pid controller with equation of heating and cooling.
@jarnix22 жыл бұрын
You're just a hater
@isakoqv2 жыл бұрын
@@jarnix2 Huh?
@ramtelange1007 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir you making my day Today actually I daily face PID setting...
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! You're very welcome!
@alantownsend54682 жыл бұрын
Automotive guy here; when viewing ECU "live data" with a scan tool the term PID is used... I think I understand why now. Cool video!
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Alan!
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @Alan Townsend. Just out of curiosity, what piece of equipment is the ECU out of?
@alantownsend54682 жыл бұрын
Networked control units in light duty automotive; engine / powertrain, body, stability control, etc.
@KevinNguyen-tw5ml Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Our pleasure! Happy learning
@motazadil4395 Жыл бұрын
Thank you realpars engineer to help me to understand this thinks
@realpars Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@anacamilacuevasgonzalez25539 ай бұрын
Excellent video, I almost understood haha. This topic is very difficult aaaaaah maybe i'm just a poor high school student with no enough context of what's going on, but I liked the explanation very much.
@realpars9 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that our video helped out! Always feel free to leave us any questions if anything remains unclear. Happy learning!
@mahmoodahmedmughal Жыл бұрын
very informative and conceptual video.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! Thank you for sharing.
@radhamohandash58659 ай бұрын
Nice explanation. Thanks a lot 🙏
@realpars9 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@MuhammadRaza-qc5nn7 ай бұрын
Awesome content. Highly recommended
@realpars7 ай бұрын
Much appreciated!
@avactronic18532 жыл бұрын
دس خوش ....... Excellent This is one of the most useful video that I've ever seen
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@1atera3 Жыл бұрын
Thank you really very useful video and you make thing very simple
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad it helped, you're very welcome!
@fahimahmadosmani36186 ай бұрын
Suppppper... Thanks a lot. Very clear and understandable
@realpars6 ай бұрын
You're very welcome! Happy learning
@SEALTRONICS2 жыл бұрын
ReaLPara you are just too much, Love u guys, Keep the work
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@melbourneopera2 жыл бұрын
Building service engineer may not need to know as deep as such.....but this video is good for beginner.
@neotheek2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on " how Exactly does data transfer happen in physical level in wires or fiber optic cable."So that even non tech savvy person can understand. How exactly is 1 bit transferred between two points like New York and London ,like by switching the Voltage for s bit the whole distance? Switching it for each bits? Smart ways? How? For 1 packet ? Update: sure get highly technical but start from simpler level and get into the depth slowly. And the reason I'm asking it here because I believe no other can explain it better than you.❤️
@isakoqv2 жыл бұрын
Sort of an impossible question to answer without getting technical. There are lots of different protocols using different ways to encode signals on the "physical level". Electrical signals have properties like amplitude, frequency and phase. You can use any combination of these to encode signals. The protocol determines the meaning of a given change to a given property.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your feedback and suggestion! I will certainly share this with our course developers, hopefully we can focus on that in a future video courses. Thanks again for sharing and happy learning!
@eugeneleroux1842 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a very informative presentation.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@johnatansilveira532 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your videos! I'm learning a lot from you. 🇧🇷
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@Pertamax7-HD2 жыл бұрын
Good remider for C
@victorblanco2342 жыл бұрын
Great job!... Congratulations!
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@lovrorb2 жыл бұрын
I'm using an PI controller in most cases, sometimes even P is good enough. I also use FFWD in combination
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hello @Lovro Sipovac. Thanks for your input. In fact, when maintaining the process at an exact setpoint value is not critical, P-only controllers will do just fine. And, as you say PI controllers are is sufficient in most cases. Adding D to some loops can cause no end of troubles.
@lovrorb2 жыл бұрын
@@realpars I benefited from adding a D in a very few cases when I wanted to "choke" the abrupt change, but yes, it's mostly a headache :) But adding a feed forward value is a fantastic measure if an approximate value is known. A good example would be tension control when spooling out VFD controlled winch (motors actually) when you have a good estimate of required holding torque and uncertanties are represented by inertia/friction in the complete driveline. For instance, you want to hold 10T on the winch while it spools out .... you calculate that in order to do so you need to hold 20% torque on motor(s) in ideal system (no friction etc.) ... then you just feed forward that value, or whatever you calculate for particular tension, tweak it so it works well on variable setpoint and voila! :)
@Surajkumar-pk5ux2 жыл бұрын
Very well explained.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so!
@juanpanguinao66572 жыл бұрын
@@realpars hola que tal, saludos desde Argentina, los cursos que hay en la página, ¿Son todos en idioma ingles? Hago la pregunta porque yo no se el idioma ingles hablo solamente el idioma español.
@l.zwieble68192 жыл бұрын
You made my brain click the whole thing like after 5 minutes..
@jamesacosta60902 жыл бұрын
Nice little introduction! thumbs up!
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, James! Happy learning
@IngDzib2 жыл бұрын
Amazing! Many thanks
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Our pleasure!
@chethankumar15417 ай бұрын
Supper sir tq❤
@sakthiff17102 жыл бұрын
Very helpful
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@novneetdhar7186 Жыл бұрын
Very useful
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@L2.Lagrange11 ай бұрын
Really good video
@realpars11 ай бұрын
Glad you think so! Thank you for sharing
@Space_Tour12 жыл бұрын
This Video answers alot of my questions, thanks but about your PLC material, I'm an Allen Bradley guy and would like to check your AB PLC course .
@Phemakorn2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Our pleasure!
@Build_the_Future2 жыл бұрын
I hope you guys into explaining the math or at the very lest the transfer function of the system in future videos.
@YewrMan2 жыл бұрын
A good shout Eric. I managed to scrape through Control Systems online but found the formulae tough going. A good explain with practical examples would have helped a lot.
@mortenlund14182 жыл бұрын
@@YewrMan We had a teacher who really did not get it, to simplify this subject. Quite the opposite. Later we had a teacher who knew the formulas and told us. They are plain math. No fancy stuff, not even the integral part which is just the sum of something.
@YewrMan2 жыл бұрын
@@mortenlund1418 Morten, is there any KZbin channels or elsewhere you can recommend that shows good practical explains of the mathematics of Control Systems. I think online study can be hit or miss depending on the lecturer. Some are brilliant and patient in explaining stuff and check that you understand and you learn the topic not just how to answer questions. But others just want to get through their online lecture quickly and at the end of the semester give you loads of hints to get you to pass the exam even though you barely understand the topics on it.
@lexsoft39692 жыл бұрын
It will need an introduction to Laplace transform for describing a PID controller to find the transfer function of the system.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing your feedback, Eric! I will certainly go ahead and pass this on to our course developers for future video courses. Thanks again, and happy learning!
@turkiyem94652 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Our pleasure!
@aminokamad16812 жыл бұрын
Awesome video sir 🔥🔥🔥
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Amino!
@adapterscapter2852 жыл бұрын
Well done
@di98382 жыл бұрын
If the output is a relay and the final element is a pump than the pump will be on and off multiple times and the inrush current will damage the electric motor in time.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
@D I. You are bang on. Lare motors are not made to be cycled on and off repeatedly.
@Neander1042 жыл бұрын
It's a good survey.
@bhanukadayawansa55762 жыл бұрын
Great Video
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@8ZER082 жыл бұрын
Nice vídeo, will be great to show some others control techniques
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion! Will happily pass this on to our course developers. Thanks for sharing and happy learning :)
@montesdeocaf.2797 Жыл бұрын
Nice!
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@alimumcuoglu162514 күн бұрын
omg so good
@TrollMeister_2 жыл бұрын
5:00 As long as an error exists the integral action will continue”. That is not correctly stated. What he said is applicable to proportional control as well. So what is it that differentiates proportional control from integral control ? The correct statement is “As long as an error exists the integral output will continue TO INCREASE (over time).” With proportional control if the error hold steady, so does the controller output . But with integral control even if the error holds steady, the controller output will continue to increase.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hello @MyMusic. Thanks for reaching out. The problem with Proportional-Only control is that once the error become stable, there is no proportional action therefore no corrective action. This results in something called Offset. Adding Integral action will attempt to remove the offset. You are correct when you stated “As long as an error exists the integral output will continue TO INCREASE (over time). As this video was at an introductory level, we did not go into a great amount of detail. If you are interested, you can check out our free series on PID Control at: learn.realpars.com/courses/PID-Controller One of the videos in this free series is available on KZbin at: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2ibYXWGhM9-ra8 Thanks again for your comments and feedback! It’s always great to hear from our viewers!
@panzznine7138 ай бұрын
hi, ty for wonderful explaination about PID, can i ask for some pointers or suggestion on what type of water valves can i use for PID controll?
@realpars8 ай бұрын
Hi there, Thanks for reaching out. That's a tough question to answer. Can you provide more details please? Do you have power near the valve? Can it be electric? Will it be pneumatic? Is the water clean? What flow rate are you considering? Thanks!
@panzznine7138 ай бұрын
@@realpars gud day sir, ty for the time for giving a reply, i'm a student working on a thesis, im planning to apply PID control on adjusting water flow for aquaponics, inorder to do that i've done some checking on which component i'm going use and a "Motorized Valve" has a good potential in it, the project prototype is a small scale so im going to use a modified version of it "A Servo Motor + Ball Valve (for water)"
@luck3949Ай бұрын
Does integral block integrate the error in sliding window or from the beginning of time?
@realparsАй бұрын
Hello, @luck3949. Thank you for your question. The feedback is always working, adjusting to the set point. The control window adjusts as needed. Remember it is trying to reach the setpoint when you set it will. An automobile cruise controller does just that. Therefore, that is one example. You are looking to achieve a stable, slow process. And only one variable at a time. There is no set formula for advanced tuning of a PID controller and no step-by-step process that will work in every scenario, but with an understanding of how a PID controller works and enough practice, it is definitely possible. You can practice by downloading the great PID Simulator app from the Microsoft Store! Here is the link for your learning: pidexplained.com/how-to-tune-a-pid-controller/
@jayrajsinh78 Жыл бұрын
Please make videos on MPC model predictive control.
@realpars Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your topic suggestion, I will happily share it with our content developers. Thanks again for sharing, and happy learning!
@vuuctien16632 жыл бұрын
This is a good explanation video. May i know how to make video like this? I love the animations. i really want to learn how to make video like yours.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your kind compliment! I am actually not sure about that, as this is all done by our graphic and animation department.
@jazzjohn22 жыл бұрын
If the step response of a system is known, can correct values of PID be calculated to achieve a desired response, or is tuning always required?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @john. Several manual tuning methods begin by observing the process variable dynamic response to a setpoint step response. This response is then used to determine PI and D settings if required. As mentioned in the video, manual or auto-tuning will result in preliminary PID values but more often than not, further tweaking is required.
@jazzjohn22 жыл бұрын
@@realpars yes, thank you. My question wasn't clear. Is there an analytical way to determine the exact feedback parameters if the transfer function of the "plant" is known?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
@@jazzjohn2 Hi @john. I've not done such an exercise personally but I have read that software such as Simulink and Mathlab is capable of assisting. Sorry I can't be of more help.
@Quotenbrtchen2 жыл бұрын
@@jazzjohn2 Student of Electrical Energy Systems Engineering here. Yes, there are methods for analytically calculating controller gains based on the desired response and transfer function of the plant, for example full state feedback etc. You can learn more about this in classes about control systems and even here on KZbin. Unfortunately, I am a bit rusty with the exact methods but at least I can tell you that such methods exist.
@SEALTRONICS2 жыл бұрын
Love u guys
@abulfazibrahimov19902 жыл бұрын
👍
@RLDacademyGATEeceAndAdvanced2 жыл бұрын
Good
@juanm85822 жыл бұрын
Lots of know-it-all frogmen in this comment section...Thank you realPars, for this very informative and introductory video to PIDs.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! You're very welcome
@uts786 Жыл бұрын
I need to control dc motor speed using PID, any guidance?
@khushinmakim80132 жыл бұрын
Can anybody explain fuzzy PId which used in commercial temperature controller to avoid overshoot and reduce rise tine
@nyahhbinghi2 жыл бұрын
probably incorporate other data points...tmk PID often is only self-referential, but smarter controllers can take in more data, and basically use non-linear control algorithms
@khushinmakim80132 жыл бұрын
If you see like, Shinko or Omega temperature controller there implementations are perfect. I also have developed PID controller but not like Shinko performance they use first auto tune which oscillate 2 cycles to find P,I,D,ARW(anti reset windup),and then control. They used Fuzzy PID I check many times, with graph and different setup. In this you get Error and rate of error as input with that Kp,Ki,Kd calculate with fuzzy interference and find control output to operate the heater. But in shinko device graph of the control always same minimum rise time and almost no overshoot . But in my case graph is not always the same. My question how to correct this algorithm? for this we donot need powerful MCU, 8-bit MCU is enough it is all about algorithm.
@tanphan912 жыл бұрын
nice
@singleaspringle69412 жыл бұрын
I don't understand one part of the process. How does the PID output control the working element. The output from PID is basically a sum of three different error perspectives. The larger the error, the longer it exists and the more it fluctuates, the bigger the output from PID is. But how does it affect the working element. Let's say we have a valve that controls water flow. How do we convert the PID output (a value) to the signal that controls the valve?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @singleaspringle. Thanks for your question. Please excuse me if I have misunderstood your question ...... but here goes my answer. The controller output is a variable 4 to 20 mA signal which corresponds to 0 to 100% of the controller output range. The control valve is a pneumatic device operated over its entire 0 to 100% stroke by an air signal of 3 to 15 psi. The instrument that converts current to pneumatics is called an I/P converter. In a nutshell, when the controller output is at 4ma, the valve gets 3 psi and the valve is either fully closed or fully open. (Depending upon the system design). So, we can stroke the valve from 0% to 100% by changing the current output of the controller. I hope that helps?
@singleaspringle69412 жыл бұрын
@@realpars so the way to control the device with PID output is dependant on the specific system we are implementing PID to? For different devices the converting needs to be done differently?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
@@singleaspringle6941 We're not actually "controlling" a device. We "operate" a device that acts on the process. We are controlling a process. We manipulate the process with some type of final actuator that is operated by the controller.
@derrajinordean81342 жыл бұрын
@@realpars excellente response
@owlboom6458 Жыл бұрын
@@realpars This is called Executive Unit
@soumyajitdas16472 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to control the temperature as a process variable, and the control element is heater. I'm using relay to control heater. Will I able to implement PID system in the current settings ? This project is being developed using Arduino. My current system is running using On/ Off control which is not accurate. Please help !
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi there. Thanks for reaching out. ON/OFF control of any heating loop will not produce anything acceptable. (Accept in our homes apparently). As for Arduino PID, there are oodles of very helpful online sources. If you do a search for "Arduino POD", I think you'll be pleased with the available help.
@engineeramitsir8 күн бұрын
how to wire and get feedback ? sir plz make video
@realpars8 күн бұрын
Thank you for your suggestion, @mathsamitsir! We’ll definitely keep this in mind and consider creating a video. Your input is always appreciated!
@NU-tt8ox2 жыл бұрын
I think, that violet curve in graph at time 0:39 is wrong. It have bring near SP line, not go over line. Or not?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @101NU70. Thanks for your comment. We included those curves just to illustrate how different PID settings might affect the process variable. As we try to illustrate later in the video, desired PID response differs greatly from one process to another. A PID controller response for one process may be disastrous for another process.
@gustavoaquino72732 жыл бұрын
The proportional control is wrong, You can't have an output bigger than the set point only with a proportional. When the Kp tends to infinity the stationary error tends to zero, but It is only theory, in practice when the Kp is very big, the output oscilate.
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hello @Gustavo Aquino. Thanks for reaching out........ About your fist point, check out our reply to Mihai Dinca 2 months ago where we explained that on rare occasions, graphics that are in an original storyboard don't get translated as they should. As per your second point, we agree totally. Increasing the Gain will certainly get you closer to the septpoint, but if you set it too high, the output will oscillate.
@masbawang7361 Жыл бұрын
PID vs fuzzy logic controller
@onel2762 жыл бұрын
Which software is use for animation ??
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment! I am actually not sure about this, as this is done by our animation and graphic department.
@Ruth__0v4 ай бұрын
Don't miss out on a chat with Binance's CEO about the future - exclusive interview
@richmond48842 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍
@amarskills12992 жыл бұрын
How to make this video. What software has been used?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Amar! I am actually not sure, as the animations are created by our graphic and animation department.
@amarskills12992 жыл бұрын
@@realpars Thanks. I like your tutorial. Follow everything. And i enroll your paid Course. 🥰
@stinkymccheese80102 жыл бұрын
Why not use an analog system instead of a digital system?
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hi @Stinky McCheese. sorry, but I'm not sure what digital system you are referring to?
@linbertsaturinas1803Ай бұрын
Sir. We need tagalog translator for clearly understand
@realparsАй бұрын
Hello, @linbertsaturinas1803. Currently, all our videos are available in English only. We appreciate your understanding and wish you a great learning experience!
@lexsoft39692 жыл бұрын
I only know from the classic book by Katsuhiko Ogata without seeing real physical instrument used in industry.
@medikondasreebalaji60512 жыл бұрын
Can you please tell the book name
@lexsoft39692 жыл бұрын
@@medikondasreebalaji6051 Modern Control Engineering
@medikondasreebalaji60512 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@lexsoft39692 жыл бұрын
@@medikondasreebalaji6051 It's a pleasure. Hope you enjoy reading that classic book.
@mihaidinca96702 жыл бұрын
The graph PV vs. time at 4:36 is completely wrong. With proportional term only, the PV steady value can not be larger than PV. Read again the classical textbooks or run more carefully the simulators!
@realpars2 жыл бұрын
Hello Mihai Dinca. You have a fine eye for detail. We're assuming you are referring to SP and PV. We thank you for pointing out this graphical faux pas. On rare occasions, graphics that are in an original storyboard don't get translated as they should. We look forward to hearing from you again in the future.