Reaper - Single vs Multiple Instances of Kontakt - CPU, RAM, and Load Time Comparison

[@MustacheVerra]

Very useful. Thank you Simon.

[@timrideout]

Excellent! Thank you for this

[@SheldonHearn]

Are you template available for download? I'd like to look at your multi-instrument template, because I can't figure out MIDI routing for multiple Kontakt insstruments in reaper.

[@imagingsound_]

Great Thanks

[@jonathanparham]

helpful. Wanna do this for Pro tools

[@frankb8616]

Are you running the VSTi as a separate process?

[@IvyAudio]

+Frank B I'm not sure I follow, could you clarify?

[@frankb8616]

when using VSTI it's best to run in separate process mode. right click in fx browser, run as , separate process. .

[@IvyAudio]

Frank B I'm assuming running in a separate process is Reaper's name for bridging a plug-in? Bridging really shouldn't have an effect on performance, but I'll test it and if it does make a difference I'll make a new video.

[@VedranKlemen]

Man, you are not qualified for this type of testing (or something is wrong with your computer). You are misleading people with this video.

[@IvyAudio]

Hey Vedran, could you clarify what you think is inaccurate about the comparisons? I'm happy to take them down and redo them if they're misleading.

[@VedranKlemen]

Ivy Audio You dont have to remove video but it is impossible that Fl is better than Reaper. Reaper can handle at least 4x times of Vst's than Cubase. And Fl is even behind Cubase.

[@imagingsound_]

@@VedranKlemen This is your argument?, I spected some elaborated arguments on how to do it, or something like that.