best channel in the KZbin for structural engineers thank you sir
@rohitsahu58454 жыл бұрын
Everyone skip this in rectangular footing area of reinforcement should be calculated two times .i see your video just to verify that
@dannycbe9492 жыл бұрын
Good explanation. You could think of providing a reinforced pedestal to reduce the impact of shear.
@ShivKumar-qw8nd4 жыл бұрын
Nice way of teaching
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for liking, keep watching and sharing
@magibooni8754 жыл бұрын
Hi sir this is my first comment in YT ..great explanation I'm a recent subscriber..all video's r very clear ..in footing series kindly do a numerical on combined footing ..thank you
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
So nice of you, thanks for appreciating my work, support my channel with your friends, combined footing soon i will upload
@ankitdubey49493 жыл бұрын
Nice work man Well done Clearly explained
@structuralanalysisanddesign3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! All the best
@veeramoorthy100015 күн бұрын
Very nice sir. Can u tell nice self understanding easy text book
@gowsiraj20764 жыл бұрын
Good and neat explanation.... Thank you sir
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
So nice of you, keep watching
@gowsiraj20764 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign Many thanks to you for clear teaching and explanations about formula derivations... Please do more videos sir☺
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Sure will try to come up with more videos soon
@civilexplorer70383 жыл бұрын
Sir, U explained it very well😍. #Best
@structuralanalysisanddesign3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, all the best, keep watching and keep supporting us
@vasachisenjubean59444 жыл бұрын
*THANKS A LOT SIR, I WAS WAITING EAGERLY FOR THIS VIDEO*
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
This was specially done for you which you had requested, keep supporting and loving like this and share with your friends
@vasachisenjubean59444 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign Thank you and stay safe
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
You too stay safe, next will be coming up with center line method to find out the quantities
@halalmeatshophk3 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign Sir, at 24:50 you did a mistake. 1155 divide by 113 is 10.2 bars, but u answered 12.36 bars. why? if 10 bars is right, then it is under reinforced, right ? how come the calculation method is wrong ?
@brigadeshivu8 ай бұрын
S correct
@Hariprasad-io3rl2 жыл бұрын
Sir I think u have to take ultimate load as 600kn itself Then we will get net pressure as 100kn/m2
@PraveenKumar-vy4py4 жыл бұрын
Sir also add a video with design of singly and doubly reinforcement beam. Along with what is balanced reinforcement over reinforcement and under reinforcement section with the graf
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Hello Praveen, Design of Singly reinforced beam already i have uploaded and also what is meant by balanced, under reinforced and over reinforced sections, please see the playlist in my channel "RCC", if you dont find it leave here one message il give the link. Design of Doubly reinforced beam i will do soon
@madhusudhan8583 Жыл бұрын
Sir, τv =Nominal shear stress 0.33 N/mm² is Greater than, τc=Design shear stress 0.328N/mm² . Hence it is safe in One way shear. This is been explained in your previous rectangular footing design video.
@kritikaprakashsharma5419 Жыл бұрын
I have also doubt in this part plz sir clear it
@hs.markandeyahonnalisiddap5534 Жыл бұрын
Equal projectons beyond the coloumn are allowed for the design
@bheemaabhinav79413 жыл бұрын
Pls explain about flat slabs design
@garrixergaming6926 ай бұрын
Example from RCC BC Punmia 🤩🤩
@arbeenbaba1233 жыл бұрын
Sir make a vedio on combined trapezoidal footing for 02 columns
@Mutant7079 ай бұрын
cant u make a dedidated vedio on patterns for all types of structures
@ministryofgirls_2 жыл бұрын
Take only axial load while u r calculating soil pressure due to column load not total load sir
@mirwaisoriakhel74194 жыл бұрын
its wrong 1/2(L-a) its OK 1/2(L-1/2a) please chick this in Geometry. and your explanation very good. thanks.
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the appreciation, ok i will check the geometry
@mauliktala74274 жыл бұрын
Sir please upload eccentric footing or corner footing design... it's also much importance now a days
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Ya i will be coming up with those videos also, stay tuned for more civil engineering videos, check out my patreon profile
@PraveenKumar-vy4py4 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign sir where is this patreon profile
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
its just like youtube
@sonukumar-bp4wb4 жыл бұрын
Sir please make a video series on g+2 building structure .I am waiting for a building design . Thanks #abhijeet sir
@Abc-wb2kk Жыл бұрын
Sir i think you forget to put periphery value in last Two way shear Tv value ... formula is Load/periphery you only took load / Area of punching shear.
@bholasontakke4 жыл бұрын
Please take problem on combined footing
@engineermohammedsoyebbadgu37144 жыл бұрын
It is design only by Column Load or Reaction... How To We Design If there are also Some Bending force is come during Analysis... Like Pu 600 KN Mx 10 KNm My 25 KNm Thanks for your Explanation Superb 😊😊
@nibhabhartee193 жыл бұрын
sir for calculating Po we use column load only but here you used the total load.Why?
@vijaybhasker29282 жыл бұрын
sir kindly upload design of combined footing
@deenkibaatein47789 ай бұрын
Hi Bro can you please explain the shoe footing which is eccentric footing where column at edge side.
@vijaybhasker29283 жыл бұрын
sir please make a video oncombined footing
@structuralanalysisanddesign3 жыл бұрын
Yes vijay working on it, will be coming up with detailed video
@vijaybhasker29283 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign thank you so much for your concern sir. i respect you alot. because you made me to understand subject easily. and seriously no faculty had gave clear lecture than you
@vijaybhasker29283 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign but sir, i have little bit of confusion while taking sections in rectangular footing design. please give me clearance about it
@vijaybhasker29283 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign thank you sir, please take care
@kinlleygyamtshookh2092 жыл бұрын
sir ... if you could solve a problems on raft footing...
@bhaskarak4409 Жыл бұрын
Bro vertical load lo live load tesukunty same procedure y na bro
@prabhatrijal3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir..... Sir, it would be so great if you could make a video of design of eccentric loading footing too.
@structuralanalysisanddesign3 жыл бұрын
Your request Noted, keep watching and checkout channel membership feature
@prabhatrijal3 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign ok sir
@bhanusairamoju11282 жыл бұрын
It should be (T suffix v) < (T suffix c) In one way shear
@rohitsahu58454 жыл бұрын
Best bro
@suraj__71011 ай бұрын
sir do we have to show how the BM at XX equation comes or just write the equation only
@UjjwalKumar-3 жыл бұрын
Pu = P/A ( 600/6) = 100Kn/m²
@chinmoy_ce_1356 ай бұрын
Sir if moment are given in the question on shorter side and longer side then how to calculate
@amansah93543 жыл бұрын
sir can u pls upload the eccentric footing design ...
@sudarshannikam52433 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir for this explanation, Sir which bar should be at bottom or top (for footing jali) .Should short bars be at bottom side and long bars should be above short bars? Is it mandatory ? Position of long bar and short bar depend on depth d and d1. It always depending on sequence of calculation of Ast1 and Ast2. Is it mandatory that As1 should be calculated by max BM (M1u) and Ast2 should be calculated by low value of BM (M2u). Because sequence of calculation of Ast1 and Ast2 decides the position of upper side or lower side of bars due to depth d and d1 . Can we calculate As1 by M2u and As2 by M1u vice versa. In footing reinforcement schedule there is no provision of showing Max BM and sequence of Ast1 and Ast2 calculation then how to decide laying position of short bar or long bar (above or below for same jali as a long bar and short bar) ? Please explain sir.
@earthlover449Ай бұрын
Sir from which IS code you take formula for area of reinforcement. Different KZbin channels are writing different formulas for area of reinforcement. Please explain
@structuralanalysisanddesignАй бұрын
Its a simplified formula derived from IS 456, you can use it you will get same answers
@earthlover449Ай бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign ok sir thank you
@suraj__71011 ай бұрын
sir whats the name to be written for Vx andVux
@arbaazmirza50842 жыл бұрын
Please mention which codes used ???? In all ur videos...
@rithikavidhu570011 ай бұрын
hi sir for ast2 did u take d1^2?
@kartikshettar20503 жыл бұрын
Sir staircase problems upload
@khajaazammohiuddin51053 ай бұрын
Now a days using fe 500 and 550 How we design what is formulas
@vjyvncnt4 жыл бұрын
Foundation size if we make same size we get less rft moment will reduce Make 4 side same size for construction
@abdulzahiraliyi86754 жыл бұрын
do we have to provide As1 in the shorter direction? do we have to always use the BOTTOM Reinforcement %(As1) while calculating for concrete shear in 1way shear check?
@Jaydev-oj2hx11 ай бұрын
Sir, Is it mandatory to provide same diameter bars along both directions or can we use lesser diameter bars(say, 10mm bars) for Ast2?
@structuralanalysisanddesign11 ай бұрын
We can use different diameters
@bajisaidavalishaik56702 жыл бұрын
What if they given bi axial load in question?
@suraj__71011 ай бұрын
sir in check for 1 way shear we concluded it as not safe , is it because Tv and Tc value are real close .If Tv = 0.35 and Tc=0.328 then it will be safe , isnt it sir , as there is a good difference here
@katilnikki71044 жыл бұрын
Cant we calculate moment with cantilever formula?
@priyabrataghosh9309 Жыл бұрын
Sir,for net upward pressure of soil,in some books, they took the live load instead of adding 10% of it for calculating the value,here you add 10% with live load for calculating... now I'm confused sir... please reply
@structuralanalysisanddesign Жыл бұрын
You can go with the steps shown in video.
@Civilzone9753 жыл бұрын
Sir I have problem in SFD and BMD of frame structure ☹️☹️☹️☹️
@jessicac60154 жыл бұрын
Hello, could you explain where the M1u= 0.138FckBd^2 comes from?
@jessicac60154 жыл бұрын
Its in 15.20
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Hello Jessica, it is the modified formula of Mulim which is given on Page 96 of IS 456-2000 (G 1.1 (c) Formula) i have substituted (Xumax/d) value and got 0.138Fckbd^d and remember its valid only for Fe415. for Fe 250 and Fe 500 (Xumax/d) is different so you get different Mu value. I hope i cleared your doubt, keep watching and keep sharing
@jessicac60154 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign Thank you! Your videos are very informative :)
@mohamednaseer91674 жыл бұрын
For area of steel reinforcement Ast1 I think u made a mistake ... in the root of the formula it is Bd²... so it should be 400² which is equal to 160,000.. can u please clarify if I am wrong
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Yes my dear student its BdSqaure and 400square, by mistake i have written only 400 but the answer is correct its done by taking 400sqaure
@johnnytun471 Жыл бұрын
He calculated with 400 square, he just forgot to put square sign in formular you can check his calculation is correct.
@aayushrjl4 жыл бұрын
Sir next time please use X-X section in X axis and Y-Y section in Y axis , its really confusing
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
It depends upon you aayushrjl but still i will consider your suggestion, thanks for watching
@earthlover449Ай бұрын
Sir in Ast-1 , % of steel value is coming 0.021. but you worte 0.21. where as 0.021 is less than the required min percentage of steel of 0.12%. please correct me if iam wrong.
@sangavaimkulanthaivelu82173 жыл бұрын
If ast1
@vkchowdary79244 жыл бұрын
In Area Calculations why take B/L = 40/60 This ratio will be taken from column dimensions ?
@kamalbajagain25793 жыл бұрын
yes
@bagguviswanadh80364 жыл бұрын
And from which code book u took ast formula please let me know
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Its a modified version of code book formula, in any standard text book you can find that Ast formula
@kamalbajagain25793 жыл бұрын
neelam sharma
@vijaybhasker29283 жыл бұрын
sir, why dont you consider footing design biaxial moments i.e, "mx "and "my" ?
@civilstruct40534 жыл бұрын
sir how u are taking b/L ratio as 40/60 ,is it practicle ????
@murthy22074 жыл бұрын
sir, Ast-2 u have not followed clear spacing rule mentioned in table-15 of IS;456. for 415 steel clear spacing should not be more than 180mm. correct me if I'm wrong.
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Check out page number 66 of IS 456-2000, clause 34.5.1, it says as per solid slabs we have to follow and table 15 is for beams, clause 26.3.3 in slabs it says 3 times effective depth or 300mm whichever is smaller. I hope i cleared you doubt, thanks for watching
@murthy22074 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign Yes sir, cleared. Thank you. sir plz teach us edge column footing .... No YT channel did that.
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Definitely i will try to work out that problem
@murthy22074 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign sir, for Ast-2 , pt value is less than o.12%. in that case what to do? should provide minimum %?
@thecivilboyverma14304 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnWTZHmcrrmoZ7c
@kwalicks3 жыл бұрын
but as per is code depth is governed my shear only, for safe design of footing.... so how is it possible to adopt depth by calculating moment
@brigadeshivu8 ай бұрын
Then how to calculate Ast without moment we have to assume Ast and then proceed for depth by shear
@panchalchintan96893 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell me about B/L ratio where this came from🤔
@bagguviswanadh80364 жыл бұрын
I need circler footing problem
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
I will surely try to upload, right now i am focusing on columns
@bagguviswanadh80364 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign OK sir
@rajivprajapati74584 жыл бұрын
Why you don't check minimum reinforcement in case of ast2.
@thecivilboyverma14304 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnWTZHmcrrmoZ7c
@raheelfaraz30404 жыл бұрын
Sir my quedtions 1)is this a confirmed question from 5th unit 2)i can do same method for scoring 3)sir due to covid it caries 14 marks 4) please reply 4
@uttaranplotter59973 жыл бұрын
Sir, well presentation. Ast1 > 0.12% but Ast2
@sangavaimkulanthaivelu82173 жыл бұрын
Sir, can you reply for this question?
@gixerriders19934 жыл бұрын
Are you same from Build it home channel ? Am I right ?
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
No Madhvendra, This is my first channel
@gixerriders19934 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesign don't mind pls thank you your all solutions are so unique & useful for exams ......
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
I am very happy that my videos are useful for you, this motivates me to come up with more videos, keep supporting and sharing these lectures to your civil engineering friends
@vikasreddy25623 жыл бұрын
Sir, why u considered b/l = 40/60
@K1M012 жыл бұрын
Column
@K1M012 жыл бұрын
400/600
@rohitarya75122 жыл бұрын
Sir, upward pressure mai to =load on column to total area lai tai hai na Sir aap total load to total area lai liyai hai, Sir, if i am wrong then help me sir
@georgen9755 Жыл бұрын
hand writing not in compliance
@mariyamir20003 жыл бұрын
At 40:06 how do we calculate the value of Fu? Plz explain
@earthlover4492 ай бұрын
You can see the calculation of Fu at 39:30
@imazuddinzoha42604 жыл бұрын
fck means=? Is it ultimate compressive strees??? sir plz reply
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
fck is compressive strength of concrete
@imazuddinzoha42604 жыл бұрын
@@structuralanalysisanddesignultimate or allowable? In Bangladesh, we use f'
@thecivilboyverma14304 жыл бұрын
Compressive stress of concrete
@amritkumarbehera7748 Жыл бұрын
How d= 0.4???
@UjjwalKumar-3 жыл бұрын
Sir , I have Doubt in 7:45 W is equal to Load Given sir , But Why you took 660 , we should take 600 na Sir . Pls Tell me as soon as possible
@akhilsurendran39053 жыл бұрын
660 is 600 + 10% of 600
@amitsaha25374 жыл бұрын
for net upward pressure , isnt it we should use factored load?? like 1.5*600
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
Hello amit, i have not incorporated factored load while calculating upward pressure but if you watch carefully complete video i have factored moment by mutiplying 1.5, its usual practice to use safety factor for moment instead of load
@arifshaik7114 жыл бұрын
why you are not using this formula for Ast calculation Mu=0.87 x fy x Ast d {1-(Ast*fy/(bd*fck))}
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
I dont use that formula because it becomes tedious to follow that formula, the modified version of Ast formula which i use is very easy to use and apply, please refer Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete by B.C.Punmia for that theory how the formula is modified, i recommend to use modified version for simplicity, however both formula gives same Ast.
@arifshaik7114 жыл бұрын
Tq so much sir for giving clarity, I did one footing design with reference of your video that is sq footing and rectangle column I'll send it Plz check sir.....
@structuralanalysisanddesign4 жыл бұрын
sure
@bagguviswanadh80364 жыл бұрын
Sir ast1 u in place of dsqure u give n d means instead of 400*400 u given 400
@tarun87412 жыл бұрын
Ast 2 is wrong answer sir
@monishabalu6223 жыл бұрын
Sir, how to calculate the bending moment in square footing for rectangular column ?
@praveenmotovlogger983 жыл бұрын
Consider critical section length i.e (L-a/2) and BM for cantilever is WL^2/2... Finaly u wil get Wu(L-a)^2/8
@everthinghere37502 жыл бұрын
@@praveenmotovlogger98 hi Darla
@vjyvncnt Жыл бұрын
B.m =po.B*L/8(B-b)^2 But my doubt is how two way shear check for a rectanglurar column squre footing
@kids-nv7et7 ай бұрын
design safe eddida mad ri sir 😢😢
@dheerajkhanal72514 жыл бұрын
circular footing bolo sir. voh kohi thik sey nahi bolrey. plze explain that.
@tejavajrala71903 жыл бұрын
Wrong solution..B value is taken wrong. At Vx it is raken as 2000 and at Tv it is taken as 3000..ive wasted my time looking at this video. Observe from 29th minute. DISAPPOINTED.
@structuralanalysisanddesign3 жыл бұрын
Solution is not wrong, at 33:22 i have corrected as 2000, while writing i made mistake but value calculated is correct