Regenerative Agriculture Beats Carbon Emissions Hands Down

[@spidrespidre]

My first thought when coming to this video was "bl**dy hell, Tim - 51 minutes - this had better be good." Then Phil started talking, and talking sense. Fascinating and, yeah, ground breaking

[@gwalia2314]

Great interview Tim. Fascinating guest. Type of person i could listen to all day as he simplifies things to make his points

[@Chase_Telemetric]

Leaving my job in corporate horticulture in 2 days. Had enough of the chemistry. Moving forward to a regenerative project next week. Thanks for these videos they are inspiring. Cheers.

[@bobbebbington5356]

Another great video Tim . Show this video to any broad acre farmer who will listen to you. I have been saying for some time now wheat cotton and other crops that cover vast areas they need to plant belts of trees through the crop, also channels through the middle of the trees to catch water runoff which will permiate back into the soil.

[@jackmac2252]

The best interviews are those between intelligent guests👌great work tim.

[@eliotmason3082]

Excellent episode - should b required watching for everyone in Ag and everyone concerned about climate change. Though its not explicitly stated, commercial ag processes have removed the greatest buffer we have for moderating the effects of surplus CO2 and thus even if we stopped CO2 emissions it would take a long time for the atmospheric levels to come down. Its at least a two-prong solution.

[@mrzoukdotcomzouklambadaboo8212]

Totally agree

[@TS-jm7jm]

why would you want co2 to come down, its literally what plants absorb to make sugars and eventually the majority of their mass, increased co2 literally turns deserts greener because the gaseous diffusion of co2 into plants at an exchange rate of 100 h2o molecules leaving the stomata, becomes more economical for plants in drier areas as the co2 increases, more gets taken per molecule of water lost,

[@JimmyCall]

@@TS-jm7jm They want CO2 to come down as if they can it's a viscous circle that will create more heat, (artificial earth cold status) and then cosmic rays will create clouds and rain. The weather chaos will play into the agenda. They'll announce a "crisis" and want a global tax on living. Carbon interaction tax at a global level. Kiss good bye sovereign nations and freedoms.

[@ben5219]

What a legend! I really enjoyed the discussion and demo. Another great episode Tim.

[@incog-neto5668]

Great interview - you always have such thoughtful and considered questions Tim! Really appreciate the deep dive with Phil too, he has popped up in a few of your episodes although this longer format allows him to expand on a number of ideas. I went ahead and bought the book, really looking forward to getting through the pages!

[@larshbartholomussen8171]

It's absolutely fascinating to hear from one how works in the field of regenerative agricultural. And getting new ideas of how I can do agricultural. All the best from Denmark 😊

[@adamotoole]

Great video and I appreciated Phil’s explanation of the small water cycle and how climate change media does not communicate enough about the heat production side of the global warming equation. However there was a tone in the video to discount the effects of CO2 on climate change which is scientifically well established. It was also suggested that Keeling gave Pr. Carter a simplified message on climate change in order to keep his funding going. To this date I have not met a scientist who got into it for the money and I think Keeling would be offended at the suggestion.

[@mattytalbot777]

This is a powerful message and tools I hope to use in the future. Your channel is a fantastic resource!

[@davidayling8678]

Really enjoyed this interview. It was very informative and easy to understand what was being discussed.

[@jasonkennedy1670]

Regardless of climate change or not, Regen-ag is what's up 👍👍

[@marlan5470]

Taxation and carbon credits do very little in practice. The practice includes Regen-Ag.

[@marlan5470]

The practice that works is Regen Ag.

[@westaussiejeff1547]

Thanks Tim and Phil - great discussion.

[@matthewjohnston1103]

Great video Can you do a video on what type of pastures to put in

[@axeldankwort3142]

Another cool benefit of increased vegitation is reduced impact from pollutants, in the vast majority of polution impact studies vegittaion reduces the impact. Heavy metals, pesticides and air particulates can all be benigicially biodegraded by plants.

[@marlan5470]

This was an introductory master class. :)

[@themulveycottage]

Great video with Phil!

[@JimmyCall]

Don't want to sound too critical, but "hotter and drier", is an oxymoron, as heat produces more rain from sea and ice melt. More like water isn't being kept in soils/trees in Australia, along with possible weather flow/cycle changes in the world. The real terms are, Colder & Drier, or Hotter and Wetter.

[@veziqiniso4425]

9:38 climate change discussion and sharing of insights

[@Ifyouarehurtnointentwasapplied]

Yep 👏👏👏👏

[@Seanology101]

You need to start a podcast Tim

[@FarmLearningTim]

Haha. Just did!

[@martinacusack9867]

New here. Enjoyed example with frypan 😊

[@JimmyCall]

The fault is it presumes CO2 is only a containment blanket as stated. CO2 blankets incoming energy too. Only outgoing at night, so net loss. CO2 as a greenhouse gas is BS.

[@jamesspencer7421]

Best episode so far.

[@wastwammerl]

Evaporating water costs Heat energy cooling the atmosphere. Condensing water is releasing heat energy. Where is the global benefit in lowering temperature? I cannot see it And: where do i find President Carters Presidential notes?

[@mrzoukdotcomzouklambadaboo8212]

Im going to asd to this an extra concept called residential agriculture where everyday people can grow and sell various produce at market agricuktural value to a co operative that picks up and collects the excess residential produce to take to market........ (Im going to use a basic example...ive seen packed fresh rosemary where the contents includes wooden sticks which i think is disgusting....in a residential situation we could show them how to pick the product so the stalk is always green.....( I used to pick rosemary only to shape the bush in the direction i wanted it to grow in, like pruning, but only using what i need for that day..)means far superior product, the resident is receiving payment for a product of high demand, the customer is receiving a non pesticide grown item of far superior quality and its locally grown....everyone benefits, and those shonky sellers of wooden trunk as herbs gets removed as a product source for food and can be used as mulch...... Now if each product in residential agriculture had a reasonable standard this means more agricultural land could be used more constructively....

[@andrewdark3126]

Regenerative Ag sounds like Permaculture backed with science.

[@Jack-w5k4p]

carbon is part of humus - so when you hear people talk about carbon they mostly do not understand that you are actually increasing humus - ARE YOU LISTENING LITTLEPROUD ??? - increase humus to increase life and profitability - GET RID OF CARBON TRADING

[@kidvision564]

Background music intro too loud and intrusive

[@barrysmith8887]

Scott you need to listen to Ian Plimer who says cc is bullshit. No open mind is needed, the only affect of cc is what has been instigated by those who male a profit from cc.

[@mrzoukdotcomzouklambadaboo8212]

Amazing, if you plant trees the rain will come....

[@timcoates3821]

Unfortunately the United Nations view on climate change is to suit themselves. The climate has been changing for millions of years well before man or the industrial revolution began

[@jackmac2252]

Rate of change is what matters.

[@blogobre]

All speculation, no facts. The reason modern farming practices are done are BECAUSE it's the best way to get the most per area of land at the lowest cost. You can argue all you like though the data is what it is.

[@JimmyCall]

Exactly. The ultimate is farmers doing what they can to entrap moisture. Hedging fencing with non-fire based trees, as an example.

[@hitreset0291]

Has anyone else considered that climate change, ie, global warming, may just actually be beneficial to Australian agriculture? Its physics. Raise global temps >> increase global evaporation rates >> more 'rain' flows into the clouds >> potential rainfall on ag land is increased. Might Australia become known as the 'not as dry' country over time? We then would just have to learn to deal with this increased severity of future rain events.

[@Ifyouarehurtnointentwasapplied]

It was something I have pondered in the 50 c Degree temperatures in the bush and determined more rain is not a problem less is

[@Ifyouarehurtnointentwasapplied]

You really need to study more about rain cycle of there's no moisture inland less comes inland it's not England

[@Ifyouarehurtnointentwasapplied]

You don't understand how hot Australia is do you

[@hitreset0291]

@@Ifyouarehurtnointentwasapplied always assuming huh? You do know what happens when you assume something before knowing right? Good luck.

[@JimmyCall]

CO2/other excitable molecules in atmosphere, balance Earth's temperature, so reducing it will simply allow in more energy and create clouds and rain, and therefore cool earth. Have more CO2 and a heat spike will do the same each day, until balance point & night loss. What you don't want is a Elites controlled global tax on living and moving.