Remote Viewing 3.0 with Jana Rogge

[@NewThinkingAllowed]

Statement of Comment Etiquette for New Thinking Allowed You are asked to be courteous at all times to all participants, and to limit your comments to the topics discussed in the videos. Your thoughtful participation is encouraged. If you post insulting comments here or promote political propaganda, conspiracy theories, or religious dogmas as if they were the absolute truth, you will have disqualified yourself and you will be permanently banned from posting on this channel. Except however, if you still want to post an aggressively rude or off-topic comment (and haven't yet been banned from posting), go visit our monolog about George Carlin at kzbin.info/www/bejne/m2awfKlsa5yHiKs. All comments will be accepted there, but not here.

[@abhijeetbhagat100]

Hi, in India 5000 year ago, in krishnas time, there is person called Sanjay, who is remote watching war called mahabharat

[@jackstoltz1379]

I can set off volcanos and control hurricanes and all other weather. Conjure up 88 tornadoes out of season in a nite and do plenty of other stuff. Animal migration over ride human will so they make decisions I want them to make. Can anyone one else do that kin of stuff. I wouldn't mind meeting someone else.

[@jackstoltz1379]

​@NewThinkingAllowed is the welded metal tower she is talking about the zip line tower in south Korea owned by Jana line co ltd next to the buses at ktopland. With a couple wooden gazebos under it. I wouldn't mind going on a Zipline on day. Especially one that goes out over the water like that one taking you to an island like Nami island south Korea. Seems kinda awesome sauce. 😂😂🤣🤫🤫😘

[@tomjensen618]

I was a student at Ramthas school of enlightenment that teaches remote viewing. I once witnessed someone correctly identify the content of a sealed box. He not only got that it was a square clock, he also had the excact time ,ten past ten.

[@DendriticFractals]

Far out

[@tannerjohnson145]

Possible it was a set up?

[@tannerjohnson145]

Possible it was a set up?

[@Nocturne83]

Where is this school?

[@tomjensen618]

Yelm Wa. @@Nocturne83

[@michaelblankenstein]

Jeff, I am always impressed with your ability to lead, but not control or interfere with your guests presentations. Please write an essay on your style and provide it to modern media people. It is so common to find the interviewer overlaying their guidance and opinions during the interview to the extent that they really don't need an interviewee. ;-)

[@atve]

excellent collection of information; well presented; CAN'T WAIT for the next 2. . . . PS Remote Viewing, when well taught, is very fun to do ! . . . and YES, it is REAL. excelente recopilación de información; bien presentado; NO PUEDO ESPERAR a los próximos 2. . . . PS La Visión Remota, cuando se enseña bien, ¡es muy divertida de hacer! . . . y SÍ, es REAL. Community Verified icon

[@RemoteViewingTraining-DACH]

Jeffrey, I really like people who can think in 10.000 years categories :) Good to have this special discussion about details of RV and future aspects of RV. Kudos for Jana for this one!

[@ianwebb9859]

Having read some books by Ingo Swann and begun a moderate to mild practice of CRV, I found this interview very helpful

[@micheleparker3780]

I love the philosophical aspect of RV - if we can see into the future and the past , we have the ability to manipulate and change the past as well as the future. We have a chance to reshape the future - there's hope yet for humanity!!!

[@marianmarshall7026]

Thank you both! The discussion of the history of CRV, facts of the 3.0 process, as well as bits of what Jana shared about her personal learning process expanded my grasp of the subject. I believe what was offered today will enhance the process I use in my healing practice. Much appreciation to Jeffrey and Jana for your dedication, time and energy. Eagerly awaiting the next interview! Blessings

[@pinielsen9489]

How wonderful someone makes the effort to do RV research! Thank you Jana! I look forward to the next episodes! 🍿👌🤓

[@alohadave13]

This was a fascinating conversation. Thank you

[@E-Kat]

I often see the numbers people think about, in a form of an orange, flame like shape in my head. I have been able to see what's inside a package, by placing my hand over it and instantly "seeing" the image in my head. I discovered this when I jokingly said " let's see what's inside" and correctly describing the contents. I was so shocked! I know what my daughter is thinking and vice versa. She replies to me aloud, although I've only asked her in my thoughts. My dreams come true and I hate it.

[@Champlinchiro]

More of this, please! Love remote viewers.

[@HereForToday42]

Hi Jeffrey, when I was at Stanford in 1974, I took a class in parapsychology were we did remote viewing experiments- it was really cool and accurate too! I feel lucky I got to experience that. I wish I could remember the professor's name, he probably wrote some books. That must have been when all of this was being studied at SRI

[@goodshepard00]

Thank you for the interview.

[@organicdoorbell1836]

Jeffrey Excellent interview. 100% of the content checks out with my own R&D. Free RV Tournament training for ARV CRV has me near the top 10%. And top 5 twice. MSEE by education so I appreciate the science still ongoing about RV. I’m developing my own RV3.5 like methods and may release my book soon detailing the extra “cheats “ employed.

[@Liedragon]

I knew you were going to post this video 15 minutes ago.

[@BangChief_AllIsOne]

LoL Salute

[@313barrygmail]

I knew 16 min ago!!!! Lol

[@stoneneils]

@@313barrygmail What are you guys talking about, youtube hasn't even been invented yet. Where the hell are you two!?!?

[@venusianmoonchild]

Looking forward to 4.0 :)

[@michaelblankenstein]

Jeff, I like your discussion around 54 min about the secrecy of RV. Not being able to tell what your results were or how you got them claiming NDAs and such are the tools and modus operandi of politicians and lawyers. Pay your money and after special initiation rights, we will share some of our secret knowledge. That's a great way to educate people that RV and Psi are real.

[@tinfoilhatscholar]

In Albuquerque! Wow, I didn't realize you are so close! If ever in Taos, you very welcome in my home, and I do hope to get thw chance to connect at some point, here or there. I've been loving the show!

[@franceslock1662]

If you give an extremely high up precarious target to a viewer who is afraid of heights and risk averse, the viewer might view the target from the vantage point of the ground looking up due to their aversion to being in a fear inducing high place. The aesthetic impact is felt as a target high up above the viewer., and the viewer may emphasize the high position with gesture and description. The target might be from the vantage point of high up but the viewer will only look from a safe position. Remote viewing is very individualized.

[@geniexmay562]

Was/is there any difference in accuracy when the activity was monetised, i.e the viewer was financially rewarded??

[@ianwebb9859]

That is an interesting question.

[@walkerl0007]

I am training my psychic powers. I wish I knew about this when I was growing up but better late than never ❤

[@annangel4828]

How do you train? Pray tell.

[@rev.randall2292]

I would say any program Ingo came up with would be hard to improve upon. Not impossible , but hard.

[@laurafahey542]

Thk. Ev is so interesting thk u hope we get the training a little bit if course ❤❤❤❤

[@bennguyen1313]

The recent Why Files has a good segment on government sponsored remote viewing (Edwin May , Rosemary Smith, Angela Ford, Joseph McMoneagle ).

[@fourshore502]

really interesting.

[@ninasherman5891]

I've really got into RV after watching some training videos on KZbin last month and am having success with it however I want to be trained properly. Are there any CRV courses/teachers in London UK at all that teach the original method? Thank you.

[@psi-unit]

you can contact me over my website in the video description. Thank you, Jana

[@bendrover]

Bendrover didn't need to listen to this wonderful episode long befor i bought a book lol.

[@patgal2359]

Coordinate remote viewing used latitude and longitude...that seemed like frontloading. (divulging too much information in advance) so when they did away with that approach, they had to make the C stand for something, so they changed it to controlled.

[@psi-unit]

For a very long time we used the word "coordinate" for every kind of number. Arbitrary numbers or "encrypted coordinates" came into use in the military unit in the early 1980s. One reason is that a geographical coordinate isn't helpful when the location is unknown, e.g. in a hostage case. A geographical coordinate isn't really a frontloading, because other than a rough estimate about the region on earth you still don't know if it's outdoor or indoor, and it could be any place. Nobody can memorize all coordinates on this planet, and as a RVer you simply stop thinking about it. People familiar with coordinates could probably tell you which country it is or which overall climate, but that's all.

[@VictorMagus]

Very helpful!

[@trillstina]

I have been remote viewing in a sense I think. I've been recording my dreams and the dreams often happen directly before an event. It would seem id have a specific dream after the event yet the dream comes first. I feel like I'm remote viewing a future dream.

[@psi-unit]

Precognitive dreaming is a known discipline, but it's not remote viewing. It's a very interesting topic.

[@danielrogers5199]

A long series of conversations with Thomas Warren Campbell is long overdue

[@VitorSantos-ib5dn]

Hello dear Jeffrey! I admire your work, your intelligence, your persistence. The problem is that the topics it addresses, such as remote viewing, for example, are never supported by strong evidence, which is tested by organizations led by more open-minded people, but with scientific credibility. For example, Bernardo Kastrup's Essentia foundation, or that organization linked to Mr. Bigallow. Or the Templeton Foundation, or something. Organizations that took responsibility for the veracity of the facts, and that allowed skeptical scientists to participate in experiments, if they wanted. One always gets the impression that Jeffrey is talking about a kind of science fiction, which one day, eventually, could be considered science. It is a kind of promising spiritualism, similar to promising metaphysical materialism, which promises that, one day, it will be demonstrated that a human being is a physical body, and only a physical body. In other words, a future corpse, and only a future corpse. For someone, like me, who does not have, or is not aware of having, subjective experiences corresponding to states of consciousness outside of what appears to be the most common, and who is not a scientist in the field of your PhD, this is as if you were a game between the spiritualism club and the metaphysical materialism club. In other words, my conclusion never allows me to move beyond uncertainty. I never reach a level of certainty that is high enough to have an impact on my life. Spiritualists blame science and materialists for preventing them from investigating scientifically. Materialists behave like the Catholic Church once did. As dogmatists, at least in one area: they have the absolute, definitive and unquestionable certainty that we are physical bodies and nothing more. However, I would only really be interested in spiritualism if I could have a sufficient degree of certainty in what they say, and the same in the case of materialism. So, the case you defend seems interesting to me. I prefer your side. But for now, for me, it's still in the realm of science fiction. Am I wrong, and could it be that the evidence that we are not the physical body, or at least, we are not just the physical body, corresponds to a high degree of certainty and is it worth continuing to live here on this horrible planet? This is the useful and important answer for human beings. Thank you for your attention sir.

[@NewThinkingAllowed]

There is 140 years of empirical parapsychological reports in refereed journals.

[@xeropunt5749]

What I learned: I am not a scientist. 😂 Too dry for me. I have had too much turbulence personally, therefore I need mental ease, physical movement, & the most immediate applicable answers to my situations.

[@Saorlaithelka8]

We need to stop the gate keeping of information. These innate abilities should be freely shared to all of humanity. Where there is gatekeeping there is bad intent

[@NewThinkingAllowed]

You could start with the 1000+ videos that are freely available on this channel. See www.newthinkingallowed.com/Listings.html

[@psi-unit]

Nobody is gatekeeping information. There is so much available for free to learn about remote viewing. However, if you wish to receive training from an expert, if you wish someone guiding you step by step through learning a RV method, you still need to honor (and pay for) the lifetime that those experts spend teaching you, and also the years or decades they dedicated to the subject in order to become an expert.