Repairing complex geometry in SpaceClaim

forum.ansys.co...

[@radharamantripathi8798]

Very good example and well explained. It feels like that i am solving this problem

[@JZ1917]

Thank you for sharing this.

[@abhilashm6711]

Thanks I enjoyed this!!

[@TAH1712]

Hang on a mo, at 11:35 why not a Geometry Check ? Hmm, looks terrible. That particular area is done either intentionally extremely poorly as an example or done by someone who shouldn't be designing...Ok, i just read the discussion about this - a novice designer...modeling to represent welds that explains those shapes. Useful discussion re pro's and cons on Tet / Quad meshing - Thanks. Some very good tips re repairing troublesome geometry. A useful video all around.

[@mmusichamburg8758]

One question: if we eliminate this issues around the surfaces, which is what we aim for, we are adding a very small amount of thickness and that is actually a modification of the original component, right? Do we want that? Thanks for the video!!!

[@ansysfeaexamples9351]

All models are approximations of reality. Small deviations will not significantly change the result.

[@mecha_engineer]

so for CFD meshing, all different parts of geometry somehow need to be connected ??

[@weldous]

how do you navigate like that? the body rotation looks so smooth

[@ansysfeaexamples9351]

SpaceMouse from 3Dconnexion