REPUBLIC XR-12 RAINBOW - World's Fastest Four-Engine Piston-Powered Aircraft

[@matthewstorm5188]

I’d be willing to bet that another thing that helped to kill this plane was the R4360 itself. While considered an engineering marvel due to the fact that it was the largest and most powerful production aircraft piston engine, these guys weren’t exactly paragons of reliability. Engine failures were common. And operating costs were high. If there was ever a good selling point for more reliable jets, this was it. On the other hand, this plane was positively SCREAMING for turboprops. Just imagine this thing with four Allison T56-A-14’s from an Orion. With a boost to almost 5000HP per engine from 3000HP, this plane would have COOKED! Hell, the Orion could go 473MPH. And that’s a larger and less aerodynamic plane. On the XR12, you would probably see speeds similar to the Tupolev Bear.

[@lucasokeefe7935]

That really would have been something. With the appropriate redesign of the wings it would easily have reached 600mph, maybe even transonic. 20,000hp; a third the power of the Tu-95 but also smaller, more aerodynamic and a quarter the weight. Imagine what a low fly by at high speed would have sounded like

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great point, thanks! (With apologies for this late reply.)

[@alantoon5708]

Post war budgets also played their part, as well as the jet engine. Remember that the XB-47 first flew not long afterwards...

[@bjboss1119]

Yeah but... why make this thing again, the german salamander can reach the same speeds

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

@@alantoon5708 Good point, and yes the B-47 first flew in December 1947 representing the future of aviation. Thanks for watching!

[@jag524]

Now there’s something I never expected. This aircraft has eluded my 67 years of aviation involvement. Thanks for the enlightenment.

[@telsport]

Dont feel bad..it just goes to show ya how sneaky the govt can be.

[@karlswartz1308]

@@telsport Hard to call them sneaky when he has pictures of it surrounded by crowds at an airshow, not to mention the press at the "second first" flight. It was all pretty open at the time.

[@bungeechord1]

My dad John Bunge, worked at Rupublic, Fairchild, Hiller, etc for 47 years. He often said it was starting to become a steady job. I worked on the last 2 years of the A-10 build. They closed the doors and I went to work for Hughes Aircraft, Microelectronics Systems Division in CA. I didnt miss the nightshift at FH. It was nice to see the sun again. The Warthog is still kicking butt!

[@soaringvulture]

I made parts for the Warthog in the 70's. I'm still proud of that. It was and is a righteous aircraft.

[@bungeechord1]

I wonder if we ever met?

[@soaringvulture]

@@bungeechord1 Probably not. I worked for company called Arwood in Tilton, New Hampshire. We made parts for everything that flew, even some that flew to the moon.

[@bungeechord1]

Oh, ok. My dad and I worked on the shuttle rear stabilizing wing. I got a job with TUV in Nashua and moved to NH. Now retired in MA. Like you, I'm proud to have contributed to the A10 build.

[@richardhertz1989]

I grew up less than 10 miles from this republic plant . It employed neighbors and extended family . It was about 10 miles from the Grumman Bethpage plant . In that section of long Island were a lot of jobs and sub contractors and making planes was what we were known for . Today it's gone and only a memory to those old enough and unknown to the millennial and younger age groups .

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment Richard, and I totally agree about that part of Long Island's proud aviation heritage and what's left of it today. Thanks for watching!

[@lotharvonrichthofen4474]

I hate the fact that they’d blow up or shoot up or chop up these incredible flying machines...this one in particular was a beautiful design

[@richardm3023]

I bet you'd get a kick out of it if you were the one who got to shoot them down.

[@3ducs]

@@richardm3023 It wasn't a target drone, it was on the ground when blown up.

[@imperialsecuritybureau6037]

Of all the billions of DC aircraft and other mass-produced warplanes, they chose the most unique, sole surviving example of one of the fastest 4-engine propeller aircraft ever built. Whoever made that decision should’ve been discharged...

[@richardanderson5109]

@@imperialsecuritybureau6037 At least strung up by the balls !!!!!!! ♿ 🇺🇸

[@jaex9617]

Beautiful, indeed.

[@bjbeardse]

Many years ago, late 70's-early 80's a very large main landing gear washed up on Panama City Beach after a big hurricane. I remember looking at it and no one could figure out what is came from. I now realise it must have been from the 2nd aircraft. Take the fairing off the main gear and that is what I saw on the beach 40+ years ago.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Amazing story, thanks!

[@DeerHunter308]

Kept me watching the whole video. A special event to my jaded eyes. A lot of information packed into under 19 minutes. Thanks Mike.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks Martin - appreciate the comment!

[@davidhollenshead4892]

@@celebratingaviationwithmik9782 Martin is right to point out that you focused on information rather than infotainment. The one thing you left out in the military's preference for jet aircraft was the maintenance issue. The high-performance radial engines required too much care & feeding when compared to jets, due to having a more complete design & more moving parts...

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

@@davidhollenshead4892 Great point, thanks!

[@pancudowny]

@@davidhollenshead4892 The same reasoning applies to off-shore racing boats, and diesel railway locomotives.

[@coreyandnathanielchartier3749]

Imagine changing 224 spark plugs on one of these types of planes. This is a beautiful craft, very obscure information, thanks.

[@lewiskemp5893]

Great job showing a plane I've never seen. And as a kid in the 70s I researched every plane I could. Even had a autographed photo of Pappy Boyington. I'm impressed

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@Violincase]

Fascinating & well-presented video! Special thanks for NOT cluttering the sound track with pointless & distracting cheap-ass mood muzak.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@johnnyallred3753]

Yes I enjoyed the video on the Republic Rainbow I did not know it was the fastest prop aircraft Do not stop making the aviation video I enjoy all of them.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@ReptileRescue]

I've been a military history and aviation enthusiast all my life, and even was an aircraft owner and pilot myself, and I'd never heard of the Rainbow. I knew about literally every other plane mentioned in this video, except the XR-12. I can't believe I wasn't familiar with it. But, that was a time between the end of WWII and the early 60s when hundreds of prototypes and concepts were being thrown out there and the zone was flooded with new plane designs and they quickly got rid of many of them after only a few years, even if they went into production and saw service. Thanks for bringing the story of this great plane to light. Excellent video.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great comment, thanks!

[@stephenross8463]

I'd never heard of The Rainbow.....now I have, thanks a lot. Greetings from N.E England...

[@davidwaldrup9449]

This is the best treatment I've seen of the beautiful Republic Rainbow. Many images not seen before and development details. Well done.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks, and appreciate the comment!

[@nunyabusiness5075]

Interesting to note that 20 years separated the old car from the Rainbow, because 20 years after that the SR-71 was the new photo recon plane.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great point, thanks!

[@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665]

Even more dramatic and as early was the XB70 Valkyrie.

[@alantoon5708]

I liked the picture of the Rainbow with the C-54/DC-4 in the background. It is a little known fact that Republic almost went bankrupt in the late 1940's and had to resort to converting C-54's for airline use to keep the doors open. Another wonderful program, Mike.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks Alan, and I consider that a most ironic photo!

[@garfieldsmith332]

A most enjoyable history lesson. Another trip down memory lane. The development of the jet engine made the post war large piston engine aircraft obsolete. As you mention all those WW2 aircraft were available for a very low price to airlines who used them until the jet became the standard engine for commercial air travel.

[@caribman10]

Chance Vought was still building Corsairs, which were used in Korea and Vietnam, as were P-61's, F-82's, B-29's, A-1's and a whole host of other recip powered aircraft. So much for obsolescence.....

[@garfieldsmith332]

@@caribman10 Obsolete in technology but they were stilled used. Like anything manufactured it becomes obsolete but can be used for decades. Obsolete equipent os still used today, but they do not manufacture a lot of it.

[@PhantomP63]

An interesting sidenote- several Douglas Invaders were converted to business transports and called the On-Mark Marksman. It was a similar concept to today's business jets.

[@richarddouglass1994]

Great presentation! Thanks for the briefing. The right airplane at the wrong time says it all. So many airplanes fit that description.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Agreed! (With apologies for this late reply.)

[@kcouche]

Well spoken story. As an old C-54 pilot, its hard to imagine cookin' along with four 4360's at 400 and 40k!

[@ELMS]

I understand that you’d do an entire video on this aircraft. What a beauty. A real “what if” machine.

[@johnnyallred3753]

Just finished Lowery L. Brabham article on flying the Rainbow in a old Air Classic magzine Nov.1975 and thought dose Celebrating Aviation have a video on the XR-12. You do great!!. 😊Thank you

[@thetreblerebel]

This was a comprehensive guide to a virtually unknown military Recon Aircraft. I found out last year about the Rainbow. It was a phenomenal step in air reconnaissance. A footstep leading to the SR72 and U2 RB 33 etc... It had a high ceiling for a piston driven aircraft. Great video...thank you

[@Farweasel]

Yep. But...... By way of context, by spring 1949 the Brits had the Canberra Bomber / Recce aircraft flying with no traumas at 580 mph (500 kn) with service ceiling of 48,000 feet.

[@gravelydon7072]

@@Farweasel And what became the US equivalent, the RB-57. NASA still has 3 and two will be in Hawaii when the first sub-orbital launch of a SpaceX Starship happens. The cameras will be pointing up instead of down.

[@edruttledge342]

I am a Part 107 certified UAS pilot doing aerial photo work. This was fascinating. Thank you.

[@F4GRAPHICS]

The detail and the effort that's put into these, with all the rare imagery and found trivia, really lends these aircrafts stories a more touching aspect. Subbed.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks, and great to have you aboard!

[@jamesconner3437]

My dad was a radar tech during the post WWII and Korean era. We lived at a trailer park beside the old McGee-tyson base outside Knoxville, Tn. I had been born with severe astigmatism, or I would have been a pilot ! I subscribed to this channel as soon as I found it, because of the professional, low key voice over and the amazing content. Will watch your "Extinct Species" video after this. Thanks for a very well done compilation. ...btw, I wound up in the Navy as a navigator out of Pearl Harbor...lol...that was pretty cool also, for the world travel 1968-1972...

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great comment, thanks, and we were in the service at the same time (me in USAF). Glad to have you aboard as a subscriber!

[@chrisnizer5702]

I too had aspirations of becoming a pilot. When I enlisted in the Marines I was told that the only way I would be coming onboard an aircraft was as a passenger due to my vision.

[@petergates5170]

Excellant and very informative video...new a/c type to me...another hidden gem..... perfect voiceover and no silly music... well done...10 /10

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@mattsta1964]

Fantastic! I never knew this aircraft existed

[@donaldstanfield8862]

What an amazing achievement, wish at least one had been a museum piece!

[@richardanderson5109]

DONALD STANFIELD There was one,but the bastards blew it up !!!!! ♿ 🇺🇸

[@SR951159753357]

what a beauty

[@paulmurphy42]

Well done Mike - you didn't just think of, you actually did, cover everything! Well done again.

[@Makeitliquidfast]

Mike is not just a great aviation artist but his knowledge and presentation are top drawer.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@Makeitliquidfast]

@@celebratingaviationwithmik9782 You are welcome, you dont remember me but I was in az when you and Keith Ferris were forming the Aviation Artists of America I think? We had a show and I actually painted Claire Chenault on a Beech 18 door at that show we all were doing. I've worked for Flight Magazine, Private Pilot, Flying, and many defense contractors as an aviation artist. Now I paint and make stained glass for the Catholic Church but still do some aviation art. There is actually an Me 163 comet pilot still living in the town I live in named Carl Grosch, I have a large painting of the comet that hes going to sign, hes 96. All the best. stevevoita.com

[@plantfeeder6677]

I saw a picture of this plane when I was a young boy. Never knew what it was. Thanks for the video

[@anthonyryan923]

I had never heard of this aircraft; thank you for bringing it to our attention.

[@overworlder]

Did you put some of the b&w photos through a filter? It's a nice look.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks for the question, and I do use Photoshop to clean and adjust photos that need it. Appreciate the comment.

[@amramjose]

I was not aware of this airplane; it would have been an interesting flyer with turboprops. Great video, thanks for posting.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks Jose - appreciate the comment!

[@mastathrash5609]

Nor was I, great video 👍

[@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665]

Theres some nice flying RC models of this available ... bigger the better in some ways...most run electric motors.

[@ronstowell8646]

Truly one of the most beautiful designs to date. I just cant wrap my head around how they disposed of these machined like a bag of trash. Absolutely unacceptable how these aircraft were treated.

[@markdoldon8852]

Hundreds of failed prototypes have been destroyed over the decades. Nobody has the money to simply store, preserve, and display these things away so that someone 80 yrs later can look at them. It's just not practical. Even actual commissioned aircraft can't justify the expense of maintaining them for many years, let alone what were effectively experiments that were superceded by more effective aircraft.

[@johnplaninac9980]

Another great video really enjoyed this video very informative and interesting. A Great looking airplane.

[@765kvline]

I'm impressed. Have never heard of this aircraft. Quite amazing speed and the design is remarkable.

[@88SC]

The XP-72 wasn’t turbosupercharged. That dark area on both sides of the fuselage, just aft of the engine is an array of open exhaust stacks. Seven outlets on each side, using the siamesed header arrangement. Plans were to add a two stage mechanical supercharger with the first stage located aft of the cockpit, using a driveshaft. But that’s trivial; this is an excellent history of the XF-12. The photographs are amazing.

[@jimfinlaw4537]

Yes, the XP-72 was one of the fastest planes developed during WWII. It was estimated to have a top speed of 504 mph although the second prototype only ever flew a top speed of 490 mph because the test pilot didn't want to push the experimental engine to it's maximum for fear it would catch fire. As it turned out, on another separate flight at 25,000 feet, the second XP-72's engine did catch on fire and the test pilot put the plane into a dive, which extinguished the fire. Flying the plane dead stick with monster contra rotating propellers spinning up front, he made a spectacular belly landing at a Army Air Force base in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The second XP-72 was never repaired and it was later donated to the Boy Scouts of America as a static trainer for the Air Scouts. The first prototype was scrapped shortly afterwards. On the P-72 Superbolt production models, General Electric was developing a new two stage centrifugal blower supercharger unit that measured nearly 5 feet in diameter for the P-72 Superbolt. This unit was to be fitted in the tail section behind the cockpit with a long driveshaft that ran underneath the cockpit, connected by two fluid couplings, thus hooking up the engine to the blower supercharger unit together. With this configuration, the P-72 was estimated to have a top speed of 540 mph making it the fastest piston powered fighter plane of WWII, but as it turned out, Lockheed's P-80 Shooting Star overshadowed its performance and the P-72 was cancelled.

[@88SC]

@@jimfinlaw4537 oops, it’s been a year, but one other comment about the XP-72 is how close it is to the R-4360 powered Sea Furies that we’re modified for the Reno Air Races. Dreadnought and Furias. Close match in size and power, although maybe the Furies have been lightened. But with the same engines and nearly-identical exhaust systems, I think they’d be a close match in sound. Except at speed, the underbelly scoop on the XP made who knows what kind of sound. Just a fun thought for those who enjoy warbird music.

[@Dave5843-d9m]

The British DeHavilland DH-98 Mosquito (made from plywood) first flew in November 1940 and went into service at end of 1941. The PR version did 425mph at 30,000 ft on two much smaller engines. It's successor the DH 103 Hornet did 475 mph at 21,000 ft as a fully armed fighter. A PR version would have cracked 500mph. Just like the XR-12 it never got the chance to shine because jet power was taking over.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great comment, thanks!

[@roberthardy3090]

Well, the EE Canberra was under development, much faster much higher flying and still doing photo reconnaissance at the end of the 20th century.

[@stephenallen4635]

@@roberthardy3090 and still doing almost the same job today

[@auntbarbara5576]

Mike we love and appreciate your vast wealth of knowledge and infectious enthusiasm. Another superb presentation. Among the highest quality content on the internet. Happy New Year everyone!

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks Barbara - you're the best!

[@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu]

My god that's a gorgeous bird. Imagine that thing with a big modern turbo-p with counter rotating props.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Agreed!

[@CockatooDude]

You'd probably have to change the airfoils on the wings and reinforce the fuselage. But it would be sick.

[@drawn2myattention641]

Thank you for giving me an experience that I thought was long past: love at first sight. How could such a beautiful aircraft be so forgotten? And your comparison graphics with other aircraft are well done and informative.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks, and appreciate the comment!

[@keithhoughton4308]

Interesting story very well presented and without distracting music. Well done. Subscribed.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks, and great to have you aboard!

[@StuPony111]

Amazing story told with authority and pace

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks, and appreciate the comment!

[@maxsmodels]

The pinnacle of props.

[@bodan1196]

You left the door open for me to dare to mention the TU-95... :-) Sleek and fast, but rather noisy I've been told. But of course, not a 'piston' prop. ;-)

[@atilllathehun1212]

@@bodan1196 And AN22!!

[@CaoimhinOMaol]

Having grown up in Farmingdale it’s fun to see the former Republic factory. Worked as a plainclothes security guard during the night shift. Very few people present, this was during the “AX”, later named the “A-10” production. Had freedom to wander through the entire plant. Except for the hangers on the East side of the runway all gone, though the ramshackle remains of the Seversky Aircraft building that lay on the north side of Conklin Road is still there. The building was used by the Fairchild-Republic Corp, drafting tables the length of the second floor and office space on the first. In the 60’s and 70’s The area around Farmingdale was still farming land, most fields open grassland and disused barns along Rte 110 corridor.

[@asteverino8569]

Thank you. I enjoyed the narration, photos and editing. I just really liked this.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@martinstrumpfer1620]

The end of Ship 1's life is just tragic! Pity it couldn't be preserved.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Agree 100%!

[@K-Effect]

It would've made a perfect turbo prop

[@handy335]

A very well done documentary. Thank you!

[@glennspace1091]

I discovered a bunch of old 8x10's B&W photos of this plane in his things I inherited. I thought it was a cool airplane! Thanks for the detailed historical explanation!

[@rwfetterman2546]

Well done. The plane rivals the 'Connie' in the looks department with the performance and capabilities that would really helped 4 years earlier...

[@richardm3023]

That's the key isn't it. It was four years too late, and obsolete when it flew it's first test flight.

[@robwilde855]

That fact, towards the end, was the most shocking: that they'd choose the single remaining aircraft of its type as a ground target for gunnery practice. Why? How many other old types from large production runs were available? I suppose no one wanted the cost of keeping the thing around - this was before the preservation groups really got going. Still, hard to fathom... Rather like clubbing the world's last dodo. Anyway, very interesting and informative video. Also well made, very watchable. Thanks.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks and appreciate the great comment!

[@jacobsparry8525]

Oh come on, I am just at 15 and I know it why they do that. They haved ined the contracts that ifed they are not created or moved into manufactering then they wrecked them for several of reasons. One is so no one cand take the old equipment piece and used it for competing withed any other companys and too so it cand not be photographed ined detail so others governments as Russians cand not reversed engineering of it. Too all so when the armys do contracting for a new plane they do owned it and for samed reason they do wrecked it ifed it is not manufactured. However too ined this case they were obsolete before ever they got to a place to be maked ined numbers be cause the JET age was just getting going and they cand get jets for that job and cheaper to keept up and run. Many times this way of doing stuff did hurted them more thened help them but they did this all over and massively to ALL types of equipment. They did bull dozed hundreds and hundreds of Jeep’s into pits with HUGED tool kits and others stuff as generators and fire trucks and even some of guns. Then would sprays corroding powders all over them and the put on 4 or 5 feet of dirt covering. Ined less thened a year they were. All useless stuff. They said they did wrecked the Jeep’s be cause did Jeep’s makers haved a no competing contract so they did haved to be wrecked so they cand sell new Jeep’s to civilians. They did that withed thousands of cars and trucks and halfed tracks and air planes. My grand father said it he watched them to taked every tools kit and any thing of metal or wood and they bull dozed a huge trench alonged a air army forces field and then pushed all they new stuff right into the ground and bury it. Every thing whiched could be used by others as tools and Jeep’s. Especially they did it any where at where the Russians would be moving ined to there.

[@jacobsparry8525]

I forgot it too, all so a lot of stuff did came backed to the USA too. My grand father buyed 4 ex-armys halfed tracks and they did used them for mining. And too after my father keept setting the tall grass and wild wheats on to fire ined our orchards as did he tryd to blow uped grounds squirrels dens be cause did they wrecked and killed many of ours almonds trees and walnuts trees by eated the roots. So he put ined to their huge ground holes gas and 1/2 sticks of dynamites and a longed fuse. When did they blow uped it did to killed all the squirrels but too steed the tall dry grasses on fire and the fire department sended them big bills so my grand father brought home a brush fires truck and a halfed track fromed his army surplus yard. He told my father you boys do start them so now on you put them out too’ And yes all ready do i know it i do writed diffrenter. I haved a very bad of fosters father at when was i at 11 and he turned to be a vile evil pedophile. When did I say I will tell cops on him , him and his firend tryd for beated me for deathed. They did to cracked my head and i geted a TBI and barked my radials orbits and ribs an stuff. I haved to haved brains opiration to lived and now do i haved Aphasias damagings ined my brains and i amed muted and i haved troubles to writed normals. Sorry ifed you cand not readed it goodly.

[@johnkelinske1449]

@@jacobsparry8525 In some cases it is required by the way the original contract was written. The Vought XF5U is a prime example.

[@jacobsparry8525]

@@johnkelinske1449 Did you read the second of line of my postings? “ They haved ined the contracts that ifed they are not created or moved into manufactering then they wrecked them for several of reasons. “. Very waste full of our government.

[@hertzair1186]

I’m begging for some injection molding kit company to please produce one of these in at least 1/144 or 1/72 scale. I know there are resin versions, but I’d rather do polystyrene. Great informative video Mike, many never seen photos! Obviously the jets made the Rainbow obsolete, but I could see one advantage of the Rainbow over jets...it’s relatively high cruise speed and range, but with much lower landing speeds... enabling it to land at most all airports, thus giving it great flexibility, as compared to the early runway-eating jets.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks, and I'd love to see a good 1/72-scale plastic kit also! Had a resin one years ago (Griffin, I believe?), but cracks started at the wing root after only a few months.

[@hertzair1186]

@@celebratingaviationwithmik9782 and I believe Anigrand makes a resin version as well. I’m hoping perhaps Roden, MikroMir or Amodel from the Ukraine will produce one, as they seem to embrace molding rare aircraft.

[@williamgrimberg2510]

Worked in a custom molding company in the seventies and one client we molded for was Revell . We molded many of their planes , ships, and cars . The Revell molds even for that time were pretty spendy and probably even more so today. There might be a company out of the country that maybe would produce these, but since this aircraft never was in full production, only a few older people may remember this aircraft and the market would probably be extremely small therefore not profitable to produce . Maybe a company that produces the specialized models out of wood like the ones you would see on a executive desk .

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

@@williamgrimberg2510 Great comment, thanks Bill!

[@leftcoaster67]

Great presentation. Far better than some other sites that don't do a good job on research.

[@johnosbourn4312]

Yes, even better than Dark Skies!

[@chriswilliams5498]

Really enjoyed this clip. Thanks

[@thelovertunisia]

I know it sounds awkward but I always loved propeller aircraft, especially piston powered ones.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks for the comment, and there are many of us who love the classic propliners! (With apologies for this late reply.)

[@jnhumble]

Excellent presentation with speech at normal speed - my mother tongue is not English so I do appreciate the 'lounge' way of telling the story!🙂

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@mycroft1905]

Very interesting history. Thank you.

[@HotSpace2007DaveB]

What a beautiful, unknown plane ♥️ Thank you for the excellent video 👍

[@KB4QAA]

Superb presentation on an obscure bird.

[@DavidBrown-cp2vm]

Thoroughly enjoyed this. Many thanks. ( I used to like to think that I knew a little bit of aviation history but now, in recent years, I know that I knew 0.005% of bugger all ! )

[@framusburns-hagstromiii808]

Wow that design looks so fast and futuristic ....until you look at the tail.....one has to wonder how it would have performed with a more streamlined tail section. Thanks for a very informative presentation.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Interesting point, thanks, and that vertical stabilizer was essentially a scaled-up F-84 Thunderjet empennage that proved to be aerodynamically efficient on the smaller jet.

[@Taffeyboy]

Thanks for an excellent production!

[@MrRandomcommentguy]

That has got to the most beautiful four engined plane ever

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Agreed!

[@danf321]

The XR-12, like the Connie, is just beautiful and awesome from any angle. Great video!

[@gravelydon7072]

And the Stratocruiser was just an ugly Duckling. Interesting to see them in size comparisons and sad is the fact that I have flown in all of them except the XR-12. Too bad it didn't include the DC-3 in the size drawings. And maybe the D-H Comet as it has a lot of the same shape to it. Yeah, I'm dating myself as I've flown in those too.

[@RunningSwimmingMan]

Fantastic video! The author clearly knows his stuff!

[@mthury4532]

Well done. Another Long Island produced aircraft. The hangar with the original control tower was Beechcraft East. Worked there in the early 80’s

[@JeffSeverson-r3z]

Stupendous presentation, thank you!

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@XRP747E]

Very well done! Thank you.

[@Farweasel]

Bloody good presentation.

[@hawkertyphoon4537]

what an awesome presentation! Well chosen subject presented with detail, in context and focussed on the technicalities - devoid of politics. i might have mentioned the onboard dark-room earlierin the video, to emphasize the advantage over the F-15. Well done - what a creation, by the same company that brought us the "Jug".

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment - many thanks!

[@mjw1955]

Mike,. your CA reports just get better by the day. That was one of the prettiest airplanes ever made.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@unclebob6728]

Thank You!

[@atatexan]

Excellent! Gorgeous aircraft

[@muskepticsometimes9133]

Good video with some images I've never seen before

[@geraldtrudeau3223]

Good video, thank you. I've never found this much information on this particular airplane. Also you're right, it is one of the most beautiful, aesthetically pleasing aircraft ever built.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks! (With apologies for this late reply.)

[@WayIntoAdventures]

Hello! Nice video. Is there a repository of aerial photos from WW2? We live in Germany and it would be cool to see places we've been. I wonder how they would keep the front area from fogging up?

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Good question, thanks. The cockpit glass fairing and camera windows were electrically heated.

[@rileycpo]

So unfortunate this aircraft never made it to production. WE, as American's never stop! Always striving to push the limits and improve. These were all homegrown American companies with great vision. It's funny you mentioned Fairchild. The Company is gone, but the A-10 is still hammering it out!

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Great comment, thanks!

[@jeremyfdavies]

Great video. Well narrated, filled with facts and with excellent visuals.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@merlin51h84]

Excellent video. I knew of this magnificent aircraft but never in such detail and with wonderful photos. Great work!

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@MartinMcAvoy]

This is the first video of yours I have seen, Mike and I enjoyed it very much. Great presentation on a fabulous aircraft!

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks Martin!

[@chadissimusrex8038]

Absolutely great channel. Highly enjoyable.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks!

[@ДиванопитекПитэк]

Magnifique machine! Une bonne utilisation de moteurs très puissants et quelles belles lignes!

[@johndavey72]

I was aware of this aircraft and it's just one of those many that was unable to keep pace with technology. A very sleek and beautiful aircraft indeed. I see you have the normal film critics making unnecessary negative comments. You just can't please all the people all of the time !! Thanks , well l enjoyed it !

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thank you John, and I very much appreciate your comment. I'd never received such scathing comments before the channel went viral last week.

[@johndavey72]

@@celebratingaviationwithmik9782 Hi Mike . They are so unnecessary and you begin to wonder if you should even bother! I think we've all had enough of being shut in , not seeing friends and family . Be assured that those who care really appreciate your hard work. Take care and stay safe.

[@salvatorepitea5862]

Wow,, I will admit it's a beautiful looking craft

[@russchadwell]

If you can't get inside the forward plexiglass bubble due to an angled sheet of glass cutting off access, how did the 360 degree requirement get met?

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Good question, and the 360-degree clear-view requirement refers to the pilot's eye position - up, down, left and right, as in a full 360-degre circle of forward vision. Thanks for watching!

[@russchadwell]

@@celebratingaviationwithmik9782 oh. I was going to say, "we need a 360 degree view bubble, that you won't actually use..." lol. I understand now. Thanks.

[@1teamski]

Great video! Thanks! That was really informative.

[@georgegennuso]

Great presentation Mike. Looking forward to your next one.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks George!

[@michaelsteiger8509]

Mike, as usual, you are the best representation of aviation in the past, present and future…

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@K-Effect]

The rainbow never got any love, it was crashed, kicked, booted, set on fire and shot up. That's a very sad story for such a wonderful aircraft

[@londoncab2814]

Great video. Thanks

[@stevesstrings5243]

Good info, Mike! Compared to your other videos, it looks like this one has gone viral! Well done!

[@teotwaki]

Thanks for the great photos and narrative

[@williamdevine518]

Good job Mike, what a story

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Many thanks, and appreciate the comment!

[@palhein-reim7430]

This is just a real nice production - good info presented in a really compelling way. Thanks for putting it together.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Appreciate the comment, thanks!

[@boydgrandy5769]

It looks like it shares many features of the Japanese recon version of the Mitsubishi KI-46, also considered one of the most beautiful airframes ever to fly. Scaled up to 4 engines, of course, but the overall impression is that the KI-46 was the older sister of the XR-12.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Thanks for watching!

[@utubejdaniel8888]

Mike, thanks for the history on the Rainbow. I knew little about this aircraft and your summary was great.

[@randym7511]

An Excellent and informative presentation. Thank you!

[@BAGHEAD1995]

Brilliant video. Thoroughly enjoyed it.

[@celebratingaviationwithmik9782]

Really appreciate the comment, thanks!