This is the BEST video I have watched on statistics and particularly on MD. Thank you so so much. I feel so much more confident in my understanding of MD and my write up :)
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Appreciate the comment so much!!
@olynn24159 ай бұрын
Thank you very much. It is the best and clearest explanation ever.
@MUSICAHOLIC9992 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the citation info at the end of video.. I've been looking for it everywhere... 😭
@ResearchByDesign2 жыл бұрын
Outstanding..glad to hear it.
@MUSICAHOLIC9992 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign this is the best video on KZbin about mahalanobis 👍
@Belinda-R743 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. It is a clear and easy to follow explanation of how to identify and treat multivariate outliers.
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for taking the time to comment!
@jojo-joannh Жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much for this video
@alqambayan28893 жыл бұрын
This is the BEST video I have watched
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Thanks for commenting.
@farukhzunaira Жыл бұрын
Your videos are really helpful,the way of educating is really effective.abundal of thanks 👍
@ResearchByDesign Жыл бұрын
So nice of you. Thanks for the comment!
@nnadinemounajed6702 Жыл бұрын
This really helped me, bless ❤
@srikaewyoosuk2012 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, it is the best VDO that I can understand.👍
@terriehilbun11 ай бұрын
Does anyone know of a good video that provides the steps to conduct Mardia’s test for multivariate normality?
@katerinagk2681 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much
@ResearchByDesign Жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@СергейГоворун-ы5к2 жыл бұрын
Да, интересная тема однако есть! Спасибо большое за работу и за видео!
@ResearchByDesign2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@farahfadzilaha.414 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your great explanation. That's cleared it up for me.
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Glad to hear it.
@chathuhasi4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this, It's clear and well explained !! I just see there is a minor difference between the excel (from your Drive) and the one on the video. seems .. Determine a χ2 critical value for a given alpha level vs Determine a χ2 critical value for any degree of freedom, kindly clarify.Thanks
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
Might be an error, however, I have been working on that spreadsheet and make a lot of improvements. You can see the formulas in the spreadsheet to check if they are the same in both places. Thanks for letting me know.
@chathuhasi4 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Thanks
@stepht7805 Жыл бұрын
Great tutorial, thanks!
@dougfoote76623 жыл бұрын
Wonderful explanation! Thank you!
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@mikorees58533 жыл бұрын
Its super amazing channel by super cool professor!
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! 😃
@omidmahdieh78822 жыл бұрын
Hello Dr. Daniel. Thanks for your helpful demonstration. Can items be used to calculate Mahalanobis distances? Or should I use variables. I mean composite variables.
@ResearchByDesign2 жыл бұрын
You can and should use the composite variables, or sub scales. You do not have outliers in individual items (typically) but you will have outliers when you combine multiple items and take the mean. Therefore, use the composite scores, not the individual items. Good luck
@omidmahdieh78822 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Thanks. I wish you the best.
@syk-.4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this! Question: I am validating a 29-item questionnaire but also have 4 other questionnaire for validation purposes. 1- Should I include all of the scales in the Mahalanobis Distance test? Or should I only include the main scale I am interested in? 2- Should I include all 29 items? Or the latent variables (4 factors) instead? Thank you!
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
I would suggest creating a composite score (i.e. total score, mean of the 29-items) for your questionnaire and for your four other questionnaires, then doing a Mahalanobis on the five scales (df = 5). This assumes that you are far enough into your validation that you have established that the 29 items work as a single scale. If you are still trying to work out which items work well with other items (exploratory factor analysis) then Mahalanobis would identify outlier variables, but you could create a random number as your DV and toss in all of the items as your IVs (df = 29). If I misunderstood and your 29 items potentially contain 4 factors, then create the total scores for each of those factors then use Mahalanobis (df = 4).
@senensoberano8474 жыл бұрын
Very clear explanation thank you
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@saritamariaabarzacancino21894 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the video! I have a question, what tests should I do to measure the influence of a set of variables on the occurrence of a phenomenon in the absence and / or combination of them? I'm working on my thesis and I'm trying to find patterns in the interaction of this variables. I would really appreciate your help
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
You have several questions roles into one...the occurrence or not could be a chi-square, but if you are interested in interactions, then some sort of regression model. Perhaps a logistic regression, if the outcome is 1 or 0 (occurred or not), although you could be looking at a variation of a survival analysis. I would point you in one of those directions.
@deannabeech95878 ай бұрын
LOVE the shirt
@zohalh143 жыл бұрын
Can you use Mahalanobis distance if your IVs are categorical in a mixed anova?
@Oz4rmEg3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Great video
@arturojuarezg4 жыл бұрын
In your opinion is Mahalanobis better than cook distance test?. How can I obtain a cook distance significance test?
@ResearchByDesign4 жыл бұрын
Good idea to add a video about the Cook Distance test...I was trained with Mahalanobis, so that is what I use. I recall Cook's being similar, but I don't know that one is clearly superior.
@zuhaibqureshi12813 жыл бұрын
Very informative video, TQVM. However, I’m unable to download chi square critical value calculator. Can you please email me.
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
No worries. Email me through the channel email link or you can find Todd Daniel through the MissouriState.edu website. I will send you the current versions of each of the spreadsheets
@nikmohdfarisnikmin93683 жыл бұрын
Greetings sir.. If I have a five independent variables, what is the critical value of chi-square? My friend have like 2 independent variable and his critical value is 13.82 So in my case with 5 independent variables, what is my critical value? Thank you..
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
Without understanding of anything else about your research design, if you have five variables in a Mahalanobis test, you interpret the chi square as if df = 5 (not n - 1).
@nikmohdfarisnikmin93683 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign I see. Ok sir thanks for the clarifications.
@mikorees58533 жыл бұрын
in the writeup, how to mention about the cutoff value used?
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
I usually write something like: "the Mahalanobis test was interpreted using a p = .001 significance criteria for identifying multivariate outliers." It is very common to use .01 or .001 levels for assumptions tests.
@mikorees58533 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Thank you very much. I will like to stick to the writing style that you mentioned. I noticed that in consumer/marketing journals, they mentioned only Mahalanobis distance, but I guess the reviewers would be interested to know more details, where the writeup style you mentioned would really help. Thanks again Doctor.
@muhammadnaeem78694 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir, Can you please help me in getting the Excel Chi-square distribution table from the google drive. I could not see it over there.
@kamarulliza91223 жыл бұрын
YES
@Oz4rmEg3 жыл бұрын
P
@mikorees58533 жыл бұрын
can i use the dependent variables or any variables for mahalanobis test?
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
Yes, in fact you should use all of the variables that you plan to use in your model when you check for multivariate outliers.
@mikorees58533 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Thank you very much. I can finally proceed with my analysis. I searched for this a lot but was not getting clarity. Thanks again for your response and the amazing video.
@cecyliaadamczak43012 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Hi Professor Dan, is there a reference for this practice? I have tried looking for some time now and everywhere seems to just talk about the IV.
@naftalibendavid3 жыл бұрын
In addition, you might have an odd combination that seemed unlikely. Age 18 is fine. Earned $300k last year might be fine. But both?
@ResearchByDesign3 жыл бұрын
You, sir, are the very first person to notice that detail...you will find little Easter eggs like that in several videos. I love it when people spot them. I think that one was also intended to be a bivariate outlier for a class illustration.
@shafeekafadlikhzamri70685 жыл бұрын
DR, what if i have more than ONE Dependent Variable?
@ResearchByDesign5 жыл бұрын
Hello...for the Mahalanobis test, all that matters is that you include all of the scale variables in your model. So if you have 2 DVs, include them along with each of your IVs (or predictors) and use the total number of variables as the "df" for the chi-square probability interpretation. Good luck!
@muhammadnaeem78694 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign Sir, How do we use 2 DVs in the regression window since it has only one option to handle.
@kamarulliza91223 жыл бұрын
@@ResearchByDesign means if I have 1 DV 3 IV and 1 mediator variable means all in 5. Then put 5 into IV box to run Mahalanobis test. Is it correct?
@jamessiklos-whillans95282 жыл бұрын
I thought a mahalanobis D over 1 was an outlier?
@ResearchByDesign2 жыл бұрын
It may be that someone taught you to standardize the Mahalanobis values so that it creates numbers where 1 indicates "outlier", but that would not be required. I have always used the chi-square interpretation. The results would be the same if you did the correction/standardization