Researching Ancient Technology p.2_a Polygonal complexes: Buildings

[@mmaximk]

Great video, thank you.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you for watching!

[@meinkamph5327]

honestly, if you think about it, that's the perfect location to grow the coca plant, and that megalithic structure is just a facility to manufacture cocaine

[@GRES_TAC]

They could have produced dried fish for Chicha or popcorn. Apparently the store sign has not survived.

[@johnocafrain1004]

I really love your work. I'll be following you closely. I look at nubs the way you look at niches. By comparing all of them, with their particularities and their context, I believe we can get closer to the how and why.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. You are right, the term Nubs includes different objects. That is why I use "geometric protrusions" in some cases.

[@joaopita6566]

Super doc. Thank you, do more please....🖖🏻👽

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. Work in progress.

[@One-eyedgiantbuildingwall]

Exceptional work. Thank you.

[@One-eyedgiantbuildingwall]

Have an idea for the niches: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXXdZIh6fbOjaZY

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you! Every idea is valuable in this topic.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. I watched your video. This option is not suitable for buildings in Peru.

[@GRES_TAC]

However, your text gave me one forgotten thought. Thank you very much!

[@One-eyedgiantbuildingwall]

​@@GRES_TAC Hey, here's my take. It's not an all-encompassing solution. The niches might have several uses, and some of them might be just reminiscent of lost ideas. I know most "open buildings" as you brilliantly call them are not in need of buttress, but some retainer walls are. If there is a tool/technique that can have more than one usage and specially if the physical function is not well understood, then it can become an important feature on itself. Meaning. My view is that the niches are a solution to all sorts of unknown problems, even by the builders.

[@shermanatorosborn9688]

Amazing things are coming to light

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. Yes, amazing and difficult to understand.

[@tiitulitii]

Why are there stones inside the windows at 0:40?

[@GRES_TAC]

Because they are not windows. This style spread throughout Peru. Creating niches around the perimeter of the building.

[@meinkamph5327]

The niches were made for wooden beams. The building had a function it could have been used to dry tobacco for all you know. Andor was a church and was used for everyone to hide in when being attacked by something. Ur pick

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you, creative.

[@jamesbrooks5442]

Seems like a docking system for machines?

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. Associations depend on the type of activity and type of education. Each specialty has its own.

[@guillermocharro7131]

Are you referring to its compression capacity?

[@GRES_TAC]

Sorry, I didn't understand the question.

[@StanJan]

EXCELLENT New Sub: Woodmont Connecticut Clear, concise, presented with out conclusion. Incredible. 2025 is my 45th year researching this phenomena. And, I'm no closer to a supported opinion now, then when I started One slight, faint belief if you would allow me. The designers did not think as we do. Making it impossible to understand. We need a Rosetta stone... Thank you, Stan

[@GRES_TAC]

Sometimes the Rosetta Stone lies beneath your feet. Or right before your eyes.

[@malcolmcooke2024]

Two different cultures built them

[@GRES_TAC]

This option is the simplest, but it has its own difficulties. Thank you.

[@redalert2834]

As you point out, the niches are not supposed to accommodate ornaments, which is why they do not provide a flat surface for mounting such objects. Indeed, the niches aren't really niches, and they certainly aren't windows. They are intended to confirm to humans that this planet's megalithic sites form a global network (which share a common purpose).

[@guillermocharro7131]

Why that intention? You dont explain

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. This is a well-known and beautiful version. But it is not easy to substantiate.

[@firmamentbubbleboyaskstobe7076]

I just don’t think that those super complex amorphous shapes that often form those mortarless walls were carved by hand with tools. Either softened rock or cast, or some kind of CNC type tool.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. The casting issue was discussed in Part 1 23.56 (preliminary, full video no less than 25 minutes)

[@firmamentbubbleboyaskstobe7076]

@ Ok and I’ve watched most of that as well by now and there are way too many things that are highly speculative, from construction methods, to who built these and other similar polygonal blocks around the world, you say that parts of these walls weren’t damaged but were “unfinished” when there is no way for that to be proven, and there is plenty of evidence for cataclysmic activity that affected that area (puma punku being a pretty good example of that). And it’s pretty obvious that the crude stonework that was done on top of that perfect block work was the later work of the Inca, as I highly highly highly doubt that they had anything to do with the polygonal stuff, which was likely much much older, just like Baalbek or any number of sites that have megalithic foundations with much later and much more crude stonework added atop of what was left. Evidence of high technology abounds in at of these older sites, machine marks, drill holes, tube drill holes of various shapes, saw marks, lathe work. And transportation of these stones in terrain like Peru is also kinda beyond the means of the Inca, just as it was beyond the means of even the Spanish to build the walls of Ollantaytambo, or sachsahuayman, let alone being able to dismantle them😂. Nothing new under the sun, standing on the shoulders of giants, can’t escape from a prison if you don’t know yer in one. I highly doubt that this time we are in now is the most advanced that society has been. It’s obvious that our history has been changed over these past several centuries, and a very narrative driven one has taken its place. I have no doubts that many names and places have been shuffled, and it wouldn’t surprise me in the least to learn that lots of Old/New Testament stuff actually occurred all over the world, not just in the Middle East and Mediterranean. I just don’t see those crazy polygonal stones being carved. It’s a joke. Getting curved joinery of that scale to fit so perfectly, even if the backsides are “rough” in some cases, would be damn near impossible as a trial and error approach, moving and reshaping until it fits. Some of those stones are massive. Now having help from interdimensionals, like king Solomon might have had, that I would find easier to believe (and do believe). This world is far more complex than our Rockefeller inspired re-educations would have us believe.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you

[@firmamentbubbleboyaskstobe7076]

@@GRES_TAC I guess I don’t understand if you actually reached a conclusion?? In most cases the polygonal blocks don’t exhibit marks of traditional hammer chisel type masonry tools, but they weren’t moulded…. I don’t think we are ever going to know to be honest. Not unless you have a plan to storm the Smithsonianr and Vatican vaults so we can see what they’ve hidden away.

[@GRES_TAC]

I have no assumptions or guesses, I am on the side of analysis and facts. This allows me to maintain clarity of thought and gives results.

[@mattpelletier5368]

I agree with your assessment these are not dwellings and that there is obvious reuse/repurpose by the Inca. Style does seem to vary but intent seems the same? Niches are structural? Personally I'm more inclined to some sort of calendrical system/ observatory. Will be interesting to hear your future thoughts and if you link these sites to others around the world displaying similar features.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. I am curious myself.

[@robertsmyk4102]

These structures were designed to last forever and to be utterly useless for human purpose, impossible to modify and to be re-purposed as dwellings or battle forts. A structure to hold niches; what could be held in the niches? The Spanish reported on cities of gold, probably these niches held gold structures, larger than the niches and designed to be wedged inside. Such ornaments would have been difficult to remove and were therefore safe from molestation by individuals, but not safe from organized Spanish invaders who would have carted off such loot to Spain.

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. "to be utterly useless for human purpose" - "probably these niches held gold structures"

[@mikehunt8375]

I believe 1000% the walls and roofs were covered in gold and silver. The Spanish just about died when they realized this, that's why the had literal thousands of tons of gold and silver that made it back to Spain and thousands more on th bottom of the ocean. Where did it all come from?

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you! Original idea. The chroniclers recorded where it came from.

[@rogerscottcathey]

This must be an AI channel . . .

[@GRES_TAC]

No. I just use a translator. You are right about that. I don't have enough practice to translate myself, although I read easily. Thank you. And also, the AI ​​database doesn't have the data that I provide.

[@scaramouche8244]

No roofs make sense if they lived under a firmament. preflood Genesis 2:5-6, "For the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground." (KJV) 👍👍

[@GRES_TAC]

Thank you. Great quote.