In case it is helpful, here are all my Control Theory videos in a single playlist kzbin.info/aero/PLxdnSsBqCrrF9KOQRB9ByfB0EUMwnLO9o. Please let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks for watching!
@capitansheriff74262 жыл бұрын
hello. I can't seem to locate the video on Frequency domain analysis. kindly help me find it
@AimeePak Жыл бұрын
AE511: Thanks for the great lecture! It's very helpful to see the three different frequencies (natural, resonant, damped) talked about together. I liked the plot of the radial differences between the resonant and damped frequencies (22:50). Helped me visualize the impact of zeta.
@ahungryflyer Жыл бұрын
AE511: Thanks for touching on the definitions and potential confusion of resonance frequency vs undamped/damped natural frequency as well as the critically damped definition. After utilizing these terms in previous coursework - it is good to finally get the definitions from a pure controls perspective. I enjoyed the local example of the Tacoma narrows bridge.
@christofferfink5049 Жыл бұрын
A little warning for anyone following along at home: at 5:30 the numerator for beta should have omega_n cubed, not squared. (The correct expression for beta is shown in Mathematica at 7:23)
@franckso58944 жыл бұрын
Good lecture, Cristal clear. Thanks.
@ChristopherLum4 жыл бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful thanks for watching!
@bhawya2564 Жыл бұрын
Simple and easy explanation thank you
@ChristopherLum Жыл бұрын
Hi, Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. If you find these videos helpful, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum or via the 'Thanks' button underneath the video. Given your interest in this topic, I'd love to have you a as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with all Patrons. I can also answer any questions, provide code, notes, downloads, etc. on Patreon. Thanks for watching! -Chris
@mattschierholtz25545 жыл бұрын
Thanks for so clearly differentiating between resonance frequency and natural frequency
@quantabot11653 жыл бұрын
yea let's go, so excited always to hear a lecture from you Professor! This is getting better and better
@thuvuong31445 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the lecture. That's exactly what I need.
@ChristopherLum5 жыл бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful thanks for watching!
@Gholdoian Жыл бұрын
AE 511: Cool video, I've always used resonant and natural frequency interchangeably but now realize they are different. It's also nice seeing some origin of the 0.707 zeta value. I don't think I've had someone explain to me why that value is common.
@nathanlipshutz3140 Жыл бұрын
AE511: Very interesting discussion. I didn't realize there was a difference between natural and resonant frequencies. I also didn't know there were two interpretations of critically damped.
@krystoflis71575 жыл бұрын
Great overview! Thanks Chris
@sethwhittington28 Жыл бұрын
AE511: Thanks for the lecture. For a real world system it seems like it would be really helpful to determine the resonant frequency via this simple equation.
@bradleyparks19823 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@selamhendrix52525 жыл бұрын
thank you for the lecture
@wes15885 жыл бұрын
Good lecture.
@quantabot11653 жыл бұрын
A doubt, at 23:00 the graph drawn, what happened to the 1/wn factor...im just curious. so the graph is basically 1/wn[wd-wr] against damping ratio right?
@King-Professional2 жыл бұрын
They are plotting the difference approximately. Even if we multiply any number to the difference the graph would just scale up/down. No change to critical point 0.7
@nathanlipshutz3140 Жыл бұрын
AE511: Physically speaking, what causes the natural frequency, damped natural frequency, and resonant frequency to be closer or farther apart?
@ChristopherLum Жыл бұрын
It is usually a combinations of factors but at the end of the day, it is whatever goes into the calculation of wn and zeta in your 2nd order equations. For a mass/spring/damper this might be a combination of mass, spring constant, and damping constant.
@gamaksaraswat75894 жыл бұрын
I have 1 doubt please clarify it. I don't get the point when you explain 0 < 0.707 < 1, it means that 0 < zeta < 1 but the system is critically damped. Please help me to understand this point. The content delivery is awesome, I appreciate the efforts put by you in making this concept clear. Please reach out to my query, as it will prove of great help. Thank you