Restrictions on Transfer - Section 10,11 and 12 of TPA - YG Law

[@sumananand8564]

Maine tpa already padh rakha hai but just because of YG LAW @ gaurav sir i am watching the series again and i have found ki sach me Gaurav sir se accha koi nhi padha sakta hai and i can't afford to miss any of your lectures sir. Huge respect for you sir🙏🏻

[@charllybond]

4:46 our teacher told us that here it says women except Hindu, Muslim and Buddhist (i.e Christian) . In Christian after marriage husband and wife are considered as one legal entity. So to protect the property of wife if such condition is put forth then it will be valid.

[@meghamalik208]

Excellent videos, I secured First Division in my last 2 semesters thanks to your videos. Much love and gratitude.

[@adv.anjali]

Oh My God😮 Apko kaise pata?!!!! 0:52 Sachhi kal Mera exam hai.. And I'm so thankful to you for you simplest and easiest explanation...jese apne apke introduction video me bola tha.. once u understand u always remember it. Thankyou ❤

[@shagnikbasu549]

kasam se mera bhi kal exam hai

[@shubhamchaudhary9697]

Mera bhi h kl to yaaar

[@prashantpratap1446]

You have done a excellent job by making such a difficult course simplified.. watching your series for my LLB exams and it is so helpful.

[@rabiarafat430]

Addition: Section 11's exception is based on the English case "Tulk v Moxhay" which laid down the principle of Restrictive Covenants which is mentioned in S.40 of TPA

[@MeerUmar745]

tnk u sir

[@shaikhakbarali7921]

Assalamualaikum rabia

[@faizanhayat6888]

Love from Pakistan. I'm studying law in International Islamic University, Islamabad. Sir video lectures are so fruitful.❤❤

[@rahuljakhiwal1101]

Section 10 exception was there in British era. So christian men could get benifit from it by imposing condition on their women by transferring them property for their benefit. And women from other religion were given right to transfer property. Basically a classic example from Britishers of male chauvinism. SC revoked it and added christian women in this exception through landmark judgement of John Vallamattom & Anr vs Union Of India on 21 July, 2003.

[@illusion5159]

Thanks buddy..after researching your mentioned case law your answer is right 👍

[@kritikasharma3440]

han mera exam 27th feb ko :p ...your videos are life saver ..thank you so much...

[@sreenunaikmudavath3627]

Excellent inspiring lectures in all transfer of Property Act

[@scorpion96001]

4:46 Reason : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 governs the inheritance of a woman's property if she is Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, jain or a sikh. If she is Muslim then Muhammaden Law governs. And if She is christian, parsi or any other religion then it will be governed by Indian Succession Act,1925

[@lavanyabhatt4882]

Hindu Muslim and Buddhist are not included because they already have their personal laws which deals with this provision, so TPA will not overrule or overlap with those provisions 4:44

[@vedsworupdash5091]

***only women

[@011yadav]

Aise yo Sikh and jain ke pass bhi h personal laws . Orr issuer agar aap kahoge ki vo to Hindus ke personal law m aate h to vo to Buddhist bhi aaye h fir unhe kyu mention kiya specifically.

[@manishajamunkar3854]

Your lectures are very much helpful to understand topic easily.. Thank you🙏

[@Smartpanda19]

Your lectures are very helpful. Thank You very much. God bless you

[@AvanthiSidam]

Thank you so much for your valuable class sir.

[@pratikshamohanty60]

hello sir, i thoroughly love your videos, it really helps for fundamentals. one thing i want to convey- i just read in N. H. Jhabvala book the logic behind the exception of sec 10. it states that the exception embodies the doctrine of restraint in anticipation and is borrowed from english law, where such a restraint is recognized to protect a women against her husband. in India, it is intended that this exception should apply to those communities which follow english law. therefore, hindus, mohammedans and buddhists are not covered by this exception.

[@yashveersinghyadav7777]

TPA came into existence in 1882 and that time britishers didn't wanted to interfere in the matter of non-christian and specially women of this land who were either hindu, Muslim or Buddhist

[@zabeehullah2446]

Thanks to you because of which you have explained the TPA sections very eloquently.

[@rishirajchouhan6300]

It should be noted that in section 11, the transfer of interest should be 'absolute', i.e. gift or sale. And so sec 11 does not apply to transfers such as leases or mortgages.

[@mirzaaijaz7639]

simple sa explanation and no complications

[@meerajaiswar6201]

You are the best teacher ❤

[@NEETISHAMOHANTY]

very nice. Please make more videos on the further sections.😄WE HAVE EXAMS NEXT MONTH!!! YOU ARE OUR ONLY HOPE. SIR PLZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[@padminivashishta7133]

You're wrong, exam kal nahi hai 2 ghnte baad hai!🙂

[@manamansinghchhina824]

😊

[@tale_of_ares5656]

15 min baad hai bhai 😂

[@aligondalgondal6889]

Legends spotted

[@vanshika3857]

Ten minutes

[@DharamShasak]

Exam mein isi se cheating kar rha hun

[@jainendrapawar]

Fabulous job, nice video ❤🎉😊

[@jk3266]

Crystal clear explanation.

[@anurag6808]

God level Insaaann❤

[@ashiq___s2703]

4:50 Property transferred to Women In England before 1935 there was a law validating absolute restraint on alienation imposed on married women during coverture. It was for the protection of the women. This rule has been abolished in England in 1935.In India such a law is recognised in the case of Christian women. This rule is not applicable to Hindus, Mohammadans, Budhists and Parsi.

[@narendratanwar8733]

Great video, using for revision 👍👍👍

[@falguni5727]

very nice. Please make more videos on the further sections.😄

[@faseehmorio8592]

Thanks a lot Sir Love from Pakistan

[@debomitabanerjee5760]

Starting was great🤣❤️

[@rakeshbahadur8324]

Outstanding efforts

[@nishantdubey6605]

Hallo YG Kya aapke pas TPA ke sare section ke lecture hai

[@cutebunny28]

Transfer to woman for her benefit means - ki husband apni property apni wife ko de rha hai with condition ki jb uska Baccha ho jaega to vo property usko chli jaegi or tb tk uski wife uss property ka enjoyment ly skti hai but vo kise another ko property nhi de skti or ye condition void nhi hogi kyounki vo proptery de rha hai jb tk wife hai tb tk vo property carry karegi life time uske baad unborn child agr vo exsistance Mei aa jata hai to pr vo aesa ni bol skta ki wife pro. Nhi de skti kese ko agr aesa hua to vo absolute condition hogi and that type of condition shall be void under sec.10 ❤

[@NobodyPrime]

Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 YG sir 🤍

[@MANISHKUMAR-mn8kd]

Thank u so much sir kb tak complete ho jayega tpa sir

[@utkarshsharma8780]

ha, kl he hai

[@rahulkakadrk9347]

1 hr ke bad exam he meri aur mai YG bhai ko dekh k ja rha abhi playlist khatam ki

[@nomorepranav]

the whole MNLU Mumbai is passing because of you

[@ThatKanpurgirl]

You are The best 💯

[@syedowaisbukhari]

Bhaisaab, zaroori tha, challenge dena(sort of)? Aadha ghanta waste kiya Maine Doctrine of Coverture pe, to understand why the proviso in Section 10 was inserted. 8 ko paper hai, 15 Acts rehte! But anyway, thank you for your efforts, appreciate them greatly 🙏

[@anjalisaraf6117]

Thank you so much sir 😊

[@siddharthsrivastava05]

SIR JI , ISKA PDF PROVIDE KAR DETE TO BAHUT MEHERBANI HOTI !!!

[@kratisinghtomar9234]

Section 10 exemption for women could be for christian woman as the law was made by the Britishers , it could be to have control on such property as they could have interest in such property.

[@prashantchanne334]

Sir wha women sc/ st ho skte h kya?

[@ayushkashyap2437]

Bhaut bdiya

[@midnightrains5744]

I think the exception to section 10 is because there already are personal laws for it. (Muslim law and Hindu law)

[@parakram245]

nice n easy. thanks!

[@Judiciary929]

Section 10 ka exception ka matlab ye hai ............Rational behind this is to protect the married Womar against the consequences Which may occur to her after Marriage. Aisi woman ko us property se nikaal na diya jaye..... Like as Eg. Husband of Woman asks her to sell property and then leave her home less. → This absolute condition will protect her. Hindu Hindu, Muslin, Buddhist Woman are not given these protiaion Because, They get various protection under her personal laws...

[@shyambormarpan8117]

hello bro. your approach in the subject is exceptionally brilliant .. keep it up ... is there anyway i can contact you over the phone. please do let me know. need some help.

[@adv.anjali]

🙋🏻‍♀️

[@FathimaDilkareem]

Thanku sir.. 👍

[@Mr_dpt]

Yes...kal exam hai sirji 😅

[@Sradha-ik1lj]

4:50 sir here I think (though I'm not sure,just saying) that since now hindu Buddhist women hold property as absolute owner (prior to HSA,1956- they used to hold property as a limited owner which vested on survivors upon her death according to rule of survivorship). Therefore, no absolute condition can be imposed. But here again question arises This Act enacted in the year 1882 and transfer to someone for the benefit of the woman - in these 2 cases ye upar wala reasoning baith nahi raha hai.. I just put my thoughts here, don't know whether it's a foolish reasoning or not 😂 maaf kariyega 😂

[@YGLAW]

Koi reasoning hai he nahi bhai concrete, maine khub dhoondha, dont know if your reasoning is foolish or not, but at least you are using your mind to form some reasoning, that is good enough for me, appreciate that.

[@Sradha-ik1lj]

@@YGLAW haha never expected such a quick reply!! Thanks for ur response.. Ye obsolete ho gaya hai, it should be removed now.

[@akashprasad7820]

The exception of Hindu Muslim and Buddhist women is given because they cannot alienate their property unilaterally since they are governed by their personal succession laws..

[@raghavgupta-gl3bj]

😂😂😂 savage. Sir u know sbka xam h kal👍🏻

[@iqrabrohi4717]

Muslim women exception isliye nh hai section 10 m k muslim law m esi koi restriction nh hai women k benefit k liye, women complete interest of property enjoy kr skti hai, or sec 2(d) of TP kehta hai k chptr 2 of TP any rule of muslim law ko affect nh kryga it means jo muslims laws TP sy phly force m aye hain wo wesy hi enforce hongen..... I think ye reasoning ho skti hai.... If not you can guide me....

[@137princyram3]

Thank You Sir 😊

[@Friendlyneighbourspider-man]

exam kal nhi sir, 2 ghante mai hai

[@JitendraKumar-yn7km]

December 2024 3rd

[@Dumbguy1999]

Case law hai section 10 par John vallamatam vs UOI

[@Dumbguy1999]

Exception par*

[@adv.vikashkumarpandey8907]

NICE VIDEO

[@happyharikameekosam]

Thank you bro.

[@ShabeerAhmed01]

Condition precendent :Agar shabeer yg law channel ke video dekh ke exam pass hojata toh property miljayegi

[@shauryavardhansingh8530]

thank you so much sir

[@shristykumari9]

Sec 10 exception...I think its for those who married in another religion....if hindu wife is not hindu ,Muslim wife is not Muslim ......pls correct me if

[@radhikapatkar5923]

Section 54 k baad?????

[@sayeedlives]

Exam aaj hi hai kl nhi 😢

[@killatakilla7907]

Section 10 ka exception angrez ke liye banaya hoga shayad.

[@shahzebkhan1909]

the most funny thing that i found today was "mjhy pata hy kal tmhara exam hy na"

[@jatinupadhyay8478]

Kal ? Abhi 6 ghante baad hi hai.

[@shivampatel7876]

Repugnant ki meaning to bta sakte the

[@debadityadutta6483]

thank you sir!

[@ujjayaniroy7442]

Section 10(exception)hindu muslim ka alag law hein like succession laws sayad iss liye unmay applicable nahi hein

[@anaiyaeity1179]

🙂thanks ❤

[@prashantchanne334]

Thank you sir

[@HaroonKhan-x8s8y]

Nice

[@cheshtanarang7543]

Thankyou

[@prasannakumarsarangi7263]

Acha laga clear

[@muhammadabuzar8889]

Good

[@shwetaverma-cv4ti]

may be exception of sec 10 for the christian women

[@R.Khandare....]

Jabardast

[@Ayushijain29]

Kal nai😂 abhi 1 ghante baad hi hai😂😂

[@thatfreakinpotato]

Thakyouu bhaiyaaa

[@abhishekkona1049]

loved it

[@BoxyoRage]

12 ghante baad exam h 😂

[@AyushiVerma-fw3wp]

Best!

[@snehal9777]

yes i have my exams from tomorrow

[@siyapandita9001]

mann kar raha hai ki college mein rehte hi judiciary wala pack bhi lelu

[@Latha001]

Tq sir

[@adv.shivgupta]

0:52 MERA EXAM KL NAHI H 4 DIN BAAD HAI

[@vishweshzarapkar9552]

Best

[@chandanmahapatra9481]

Reason behind a restraint for married woman except hindu, muslim or buddhist is to safeguard the interest of the married woman who could be easily exploited by their husband.

[@pankajmali1306]

Ye Hindu, Muslim, air Buddhist is lite dala hai… because they have different laws and they should follow that…. That’s why this exception

[@khan_vlog00]

Bhai mera to 2 ghante baad exam hai😅😅

[@devrathuniyal]

YG law does not responds to given whatsApp no even after 24 hours...

[@YGLAW]

2 things 1st: maine bola nahi kabhi ki 24 hour reply guarantee hai 2nd: i didnt reply becaue you want to buy just the notes and that is because you dont want to pay for the full course, also you want to pay via upi and want notes on whatsapp, i never offered any such service in any of the videos Jo main offer kar raha hu woh khareedna ho tou khareedo bhai, nahi khareedna tou matt khareedo, i dont make a la carte packs for anyone, i am running a coaching business, some of you need to understand that naukar thodi na hu aapka main, do you even call other institutes and demand such services ? And do they entertain you personally or they divert you to a useless customer care executive. Koi seedha direct baat bhi nahi karta mere jaise, so at least have some decency and common sense while messaging

[@karankashyap9260]

yes i have exam tomorrow

[@JitendraKumar-yn7km]

Sahi hy

[@AbhishekYadav-p4v]

Bhai sach me kal exam h 😢

[@DJ58126]

hey, I have got the reason why its written - (not hindu, Muhammedan or Buddhist )

[@YGLAW]

Tou bata do bhai suspense kyu bana rahee ho 😅

[@aaryadandir4653]

great

[@Rabaika_here]

Thaaaankeww sirttt