Review | Canon RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM - even better than expected!

Alex heads to the Lake District with the new Canon RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM lens and the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, testing their performance across landscapes, portraits, macro shots, and more. Check out the full review to hear her final verdict!
3:00 - The Canon RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM lens does not come with a lens hood. The EW-73D lens hood will be sold seperately - see link below.
📷 Pre-order now:
Canon RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM: bit.ly/4gjBgy8
📷 Buy now:
Canon EOS R6 Mark II Body: bit.ly/3DtCAM3
ProMaster Variable ND Filter: bit.ly/3XDOoXt
*Canon EW-73D Lens Hood: bit.ly/3B8LuRG
📷 Equipment used to create this video:
Sony ZV-E1 Full-frame Mirrorless Vlog Camera: bit.ly/440q9DF
Sony FE 24-70 F2.8 GM II Lens: bit.ly/36N4er8
Rode Wireless Go II Microphone: bit.ly/42Z8gVp
ProMaster Professional Carbon Fibre Tripod & Head: bit.ly/3CYffBw
ProMaster Filter 82mm Variable ND - Digital HGX (1.3-8 stops): bit.ly/3LQ1IQ7
📷 MORE from Wilkinson Cameras:
Website: www.wilkinson....
TikTok: / wilkinsoncameras
Facebook: / wilkinsoncameras
Instagram: / wilkinsoncameras
Twitter: / wilkicameras
Blog at www.wilkinson....
#Canon #CanonLens #Photography

[@Jcwwolf]

Honestly, this lens just saved me from leaving Canon. I am tired of the lack of affordable lenses and also no third-party support for full-framelensess.

[@Aneliuse]

I just moved to photography recently. Got the eos R (the first full frame mirrorless), and frankly, I love the L lenses, but theyre darn expensive. Primes are OK but no weather sealing for the f/1.8 is just dood. Anyways, im thinking of getting this one vs 24-105. I have the 70-200 f4, which, while not as sharp(i tested this) as a consumer prime lens, is still really good with contrast. That lens “saved” me from changing. Whatever gives me the better IQ is the winner for me between 28-70 and 24-105 f4l imo I already know what i want to shoot, so my issue is absolutely getting the right lenses for it

[@Jcwwolf]

@@Aneliuse I have the EF 24-105 Mark 1 and it’s a phenomenal lens. My problem is I am jealous of what the other brands get because of the third party support. Like for example I would love to use the sigma 28-48 F1.8 or the Tamron 35-150 F2-2.8.

[@Aneliuse]

@@Jcwwolf ofc it might be annoying, but technically you could always adapt EF third party lenses. Ofc, its hardly an optimal solution. I would also love a good wide angle prime lens under f2, which is one of the biggest advantages that fullframe gives. But 16mm f2.8 is all theyve made.

[@Jcwwolf]

@@Aneliuse I have thought about it but the problem with EF lenses is they hold their value for so long damn 😭. I wanted to buy an EF 70-200 mark 2 and it was going for $1200. Mind you I know it's good but that lens is a decade old.

[@Aneliuse]

@@Jcwwolf naah man 1200bucks is crazy 🙏😓 maybe if its 2.8? Still pretty expensive though. i live in europe so prices are already extremely exorbitant, but even my 70-200 rf f4 is around 1500 usd. I can find good wide angle EF’s for around 600 bucks though

[@gautamphotogram]

It's an amazing lens for wedding photographers who wants brighter Aperture at low cost & decent image quality. Also it is a great choice for travel photography, also serves the purpose of day to day photography. I think it's a smart move by canon

[@momentphotos79]

Canon keeps miracles for their honest customers ❤

[@ukejem]

Great review. Really enjoyed seeing your range of photos

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thank you so much! Thanks for watching 😄

[@theycallmeglen]

Very impressed by your samples from this lens. This will be a one-and-done lens for my R8!

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thank you! Glad you liked them. It's the perfect lens for that... I literally just took it on a walk with my friends and took samples along the way and I think that's perfect for an every day all-round quality lens like this 😊

[@WondersofGuyana]

Thank you for mentioning the 24-105 f4 because I'm literally searching for comparisons between the two so i can decide on what to get. I'm still on the side of the 24-105.

[@RVarrun]

It'll be perfect with the R8

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Couldn't agree more!

[@emartens52]

After seeing multiple reviews I'm considering trading my 24-105 F/4 L for this lens.

[@MusikPiratCH]

@@emartens52 Don't do it! It's not worth it! Your RF 24-105 f4L is far more versatile! Yes, you lose 1 stop of light. However the prize on the RF 28-70mm f2.8 is more expensive than the RF 24-105 f4L and you will have to buy a lens hood separately! I think even for the R8 the RF 24-105 f4L is the better choice (even if it's hevier)!

[@goldfries]

@@MusikPiratCH I like that RF 24-105 F4L has dedicated control ring and focus ring.

[@mareksykora3891]

I hate controls of R8 as same as every plastic STM lens... so not for myself, photo must be fun for me, not hate... but I envy everybody who can live with this output perfect combo...

[@h.o.j2375]

I totally agree with you on how annoying the extra turning to start shooting position. I hated it on the RFS 18-45mm, it’s the sole reason I wouldn’t buy this lens, otherwise it would have been a winner.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

I' glad it's not just me 😅 The RF-S 18-45mm is much more annoying than this one. It's do easy to knock into the "non-shooting" position as well. Very frustrating. Fortunately, the RF 28-70mm isn't *as* annoying and makes up for it by being a great lens.

[@ArifKhan.]

That sounds hella annoying! Getting my copy in a few days, lets see if the compact nature and IQ is enough for me to look past the 'starting turn' problem.

[@henrysteadman963]

I can see that having to extend the barrel to 28mm point before you can start shooting will feel like a bit of a nuisance.... But looking at what we gain in return for this characteristic, to have the lens ready immediately at that 28mm focal length, the barrel length would be permanently as long as that slightly zoomed starting point... looks about 30mm longer. So in exchange for the chore of having to extend to 28mm position to begin shooting, one gets a shorter length lens for storage. Maybe not a perfect solution, but in most design decisions there are trade-offs as is the case in this instance. 🙌

[@goodtimezproductionz]

I was close to buying the Rf24-105 f4 but I think I'll get this instead !!!!

[@dksl9899]

YES I'm thinking of selling my 24-105! it's just not enough of everything (reach, light) and is too heavy

[@cosmonaut1961]

Thank you for the review! Was stabilisation ON at 03:25? It looked a little bit too shaky... 🤔

[@Pixelpeeps-69]

Great video 👍 24-105 f4 lens is more versatile as an an outdoor travel lens for me

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thanks for watching! While the F4 lens offers more versatility in terms of focal length, this lens still delivers excellent performance and works well for a wide range of photography styles.

[@superstringsbro]

I agree. 28mm is not wide enough for me.

[@pencilauyeung4863]

​@@WilkinsonCamerasf4L is heavier, not suitable for r8

[@MusikPiratCH]

@@pencilauyeung4863 Why not? Who owns the R8 and an RF 24-105mm f4L can be called very lucky. And there's no need for an RF 28-70mm f2.8 IS STM lens! I had chosen the RF 24-105mm f4L over the RF 24-70mm f2.8L lens when I bought it together with my R6! I'd chose it again because it's a fantastic lens very versatile and it's the cheapest L-glass at the moment!

[@goldfries]

@@pencilauyeung4863 so "suitable" or not depends on weight? Nah, I have the RF 24-105 F4 and it works great with the R8.

[@basilbcf]

If I had a burning need for 2.8 I might consider this, but my 24-104 f4 serves my needs perfectly 99.9% of the time. I would much rather have the extra zoom range and L build quality. If I find I need brighter lens I can always pop on my EF 50 f1.4 with adapter or my RF 85 f2.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

@@basilbcf absolutely - if you’ve already got the more versatile 24-105 F4L and don’t really need the F2.8 aperture… certainly no reason to buy this! As an upgrade from a kit lens and a more affordable alternative to a 24-70 F2.8 lens though… definitely one to consider. I’d probably rather carry this around for long periods over the RF 24-70 F2.8L as well 😅

[@Thedivinevision.19]

Hey man am looking to get rf85 f2 would really love your honest review on that lens not going macro on that mostly to be used for streets and portraits

[@simonmaduxx6777]

@@Thedivinevision.19 thats an old lens with lots of reviews. google is your friend, and also check the digital picture site. That barrel extension focusing is bizzare and not great...supposed to be a prime lens but functions like a zoom.

[@H4GRlD]

Thanks for the review. It's 1550$ here in Budapest where I live. At this price it's a hard pass for now. It needs to drop at least 30% from this price IMO with all these flaws it has compared to L lenses. Thanks for being honest about this aspect in your video. Best wishes from Hungary.

[@bokehbeauty]

Gorgeous real-life images. Best pre-view I saw so far. You are an ambassador to be nominated. I thought of the price being ridiculous, but after having seen the bokeh, humm, maybe it’ll give it a home.

[@Maximilan20]

I wonder where does the 24-70 L fits in now. I would like to see the performance and quality test

[@aNumberOne]

Canon wasn’t selling enough of them so they had to drop a stm version to satisfy their customers because the l lens is way too expensive.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

The L series are a step above this lens. This lens offers very impressive image quality whilst combing size and weight advantages… but L series are a whole other animals with faster and often even quieter AF and better optical features leading to even better image quality. They’re also built to professional standards. This lens has weather sealing, but it still doesn’t have the L series overall build quality. Those lenses are designed to withstand professional use.

[@aNumberOne]

@@WilkinsonCameras I was actually deciding between this and the 24-105 L as my first lens. I might go with the L because the image quality is almost identical to the 50mm 1.2 L of course it being a f4.

[@kenneth6102]

@@aNumberOne The chromatic aberration and the lack of sharpness of the RF24-105mm F4L is problematic towards the edges. Its weight at 600g is great for travel, but I now use my budget non-L primes for work portfolio. Perhaps I am just unlucky to have a bad copy of the lens, but I don't think it improved much from the EF24-105mm F4L ii. Its image quality is inferior to the budget primes and the Sigma EF 24-70mm f2.8 DG OS HSM Art (1.2kg with the EF-RF control ring mount adapter, too heavy for travel). A used RF24-70mm f2.8L is probably worth considering if your main concern is image quality.

[@joakimskurk]

I regretted upgrading from M50 to R8 because of the lens pricing. This lens changes everything for a broke amateur like me. 😊

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Glad to hear this lens is making a difference for you! The R8 paired with the right glass can be a great setup. Have you had a chance to shoot with it yet? Would love to know how you're finding it!

[@joakimskurk]

@WilkinsonCameras I haven't bought this lens yet. I only have the kit lens. I mainly use M42 adapter and retro manual vintage lenses from the 60s and 70s. Love the R8 tho, but miss a goid allround zoom lens when shooting the kids.

[@Artistresearcher]

I was on the brink of buying a control ring and a second hand EF zoom lens for my RP and then saw the announcement. I am so pleased and will definitely purchasing. Size & weight is a big issue for me as I find it really puts me off taking my camera out for the day. Buying a mirrorless full frame was meant to solve that issue. Im hoping to get my mojo back with this lens as got out of the habit of regularly using my camera. Fingers crossed.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Ahh yes it will be a great lens for the RP 😊 I hope that it helps to get your mojo back too - it’s easy to get into a habit of not taking a camera out with you - having a camera and lens combo you enjoy using makes such a difference. But also things like a strap that’s quick and easy to adjust so you can go from carrying comfortably to shooting in seconds can also be massively beneficial and help you want to take your camera out as well. I like the Peak Design Leash on smaller kit combos for this very reason. Or the Peak Design Slide Lite if you prefer wider straps.

[@cashino]

Best review so far, Thanks

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thank you, so glad you liked it and thanks for watching!

[@mhmaclean]

Great review Alex, thanks!

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thank you, so glad you liked it 😊 Thanks for watching!

[@CoolBreeze031_Photography]

Very nice review! Thanks

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thanks for watching!

[@mrphoenixasmr]

Quick question. Is the auto focus noise (for video) on this lens as quite as the stock (non L series) 24-105 or is it closer to the 50mm stm prime etc? I also own the L series (24-105) and it's "clicking" drives me crazy haha. I love how insanely quite the stock 24-105 is but i would love a silent f/2.8 zoom in my collection too. many thanks for the video!

[@glenschneider5978]

I really love the 28-70 f/2 . And I’d be ok with the cost; But I’m not ok with the weight. I just can’t carry that around as an everyday lens, so I’ve been renting it for events. This might be the answer I was looking for.

[@craigcarlson4022]

Have the 24-105 f/4 but would love something lighter and more compact. If it’s even a hair sharper than that, i’m all in.

[@RishishPandey]

I’m currently deciding between the 28-70mm f/2.8 and the 24-70mm f/2.8 L for travel and portrait photography. Up until now, I’ve been using the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II EF and have been really happy with it, but it’s a bit cumbersome for travel. I used to rely on my nifty fifty while traveling, but unfortunately, it broke, and Canon can’t repair it. In a way, it’s a blessing because I’ve always wanted a mid-range zoom lens with superior image quality. I’ve seen plenty of reviews for the 24-70mm, but I can’t seem to find any detailed comparisons between the new 28-70mm f/2.8 and the 24-70mm. I know the 24-70mm L series lens has an edge in terms of build and quality, but I’m curious if it’s worth the extra price and weight. Would love your thoughts on this!

[@raserex]

Thanks for the real world photos. I'm saving up for a 2.8 for indoor sports/family events. My only thing I wonder about is, is the 70mm long enough to grab closer compositions like with basket ball and volleyball (from the bleachers)? I just got the R10. Thanks for the great video!

[@IanSAbraham]

How does this compare with 24-70 F2.8 USM lens?

[@fonzeee1979]

I like the sound of this lens. I'll consider selling my RF35mm, RF50mm and RF24-50 to replace with this one... it's just that there's still a budgetary chasm to fill there - better start saving :)

[@Vlay76]

You'll still come up short 🏧

[@blakberi]

Great looking lens, price needs to drop by a couple of hundred dollars though so I will wait 6 months before buying

[@MarcinTyla]

This lens for R10. Good everyday deal for universal shooting? Hope for answer

[@TimeTraveller969]

It's a great introduction of lens. Thank you for sharing this update. Notice a lot of "expert comments" from people who don't own the lens yet but have something to knock it down. From what I see, this lens will work for most photographers who are not doing professional work ( I bet some pro will have it in there bags though). So that's about 80-90% of people watching camera reviews by YT influencer who are not doing professional work, but talk about professional equipment they test for different brands. Most people that complain about cameras and lenses expecting the equipment to do the work and fix their inability to take great images, are just whiners/wankers that like to buy lots of camera equipment they don't use, or don't know how to use... lol

[@unloadedone]

I'm not noticing much a difference in AF speed between this and my 24-105 f4L which surprised me. They are pretty even in what Ive seen so far in my shooting. The f4L seems a tad sharper but I really have to look hard to see it.

[@kattmedpistol]

Oooooo im lost. Should I get this or tamaron 24-70 or sigma art 24-70 (with adapter) 😫 anyone?

[@camacho265]

I wanna know this also 👆🏼

[@juhaaavalaakso455]

Thank you for this video. Is focusing silent or will it make sound like Canon Primes do? I have RF 24 mm 1.8 IS which I will change to this lens and that does hit AF actually pretty aggressively just like all Canon Primes do. Canons RF-S Zoom lenses are dead silent in every way. So is this lens silent? I will order it in 2 months. I got R8 my first FF and I love it. Gonna pair that new Zoom with it. This is also great in size. I dont like heavy staff and this is just a hobby and family camera.

[@shafhussain929]

Looks great! Which variable nd filter did you use?

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thanks! We used a ProMaster HGX - they’re not cheap, but… they’re not cheap! No colour cast and multicoated to ensure there’s no image quality loss. In the UK: www.wilkinson.co.uk/promaster-variable-nd-hgx/ In the USA you can get them from good independent photo dealers: promaster.com/Dealers/Find More info: www.filters.promaster.com/vnd-hgx-prime

[@SwapnilSolanki-ue9rb]

Which Camera you shoot this Video? Please tell.❤

[@quintennn]

Glad I found this review! The zoom to use it is not a huge deal, but it shouldn't be a thing at this price point. In euros it's over 1300. They should've either made the body bigger or given us the 24mm that looks to be hidden between the stored mode and 28mm 😂 After seeing this I'm certain that I'll be going for a sigma 24-70 ef lens.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thanks for watching! Just bear in mind that the Sigma with an adapter will be over 1kg in weight and 132mm long versus 490g and 92mm for the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM.

[@francescogianniconsentino9301]

the 24-105 f4 at the same pricepoint is the much better alternative!

[@ccming]

Why is RF24-105f4 is a L lens because Air Sphere Coating (ASC) helps significantly reduce lens ghosting and flare. RF28-70f2.8 don't has ASC

[@atselykovskiy]

Hope this lens will be discounted

[@BruceLeroyUK]

😂😂😂

[@WilkinsonCameras]

We'd not expect a brand new lens to be discounted any time soon, but we'd like to see it as a bundled option with certain bodies and this usually brings the price down a touch.

[@Fremen02]

I really want to know how this lens compares to the EF 24-70 II and the Sigma 24-70 etc.

[@twisted_myk]

Yes! Very similar prices.

[@Fremen02]

@@twisted_myk Well I want to know if the image quality is similar, not the price :)

[@twisted_myk]

We share a similar curiosity@@Fremen02 I was only saying that you're right to ask for that comparison. Their prices mean they'll be on the same table when people are making purchase decisions.

[@1RetroMetro1]

Sold my EF ii for this 28-70, my priority is weight and compact though. That was one reason why I replaced it

[@thanoskaza]

@@1RetroMetro1how is the sharpness so far?? Is the 28-70 noisy? Especially in video??

[@kudlabartosz]

Please help. Which one is better for indoor filming.... RF 24-105 L F4 or the one from your review?

[@WilkinsonCameras]

I'd personally recommend the 28-70mm F2.8 for its wider aperture, which is ideal for indoor filming. However, it’s worth considering how much you might value the extended focal length of the 24-105mm. As a videographer, I find the F2.8 aperture invaluable, especially in lower-light situations, but ultimately, the choice comes down to your specific needs. Hope this helps! Thanks, Olivia 😊

[@kudlabartosz]

@@WilkinsonCameras Thanks a lot for so quick reply !!! I've just ordered F2.8. I will let you know if it meets my expectations 🙂

[@christiangallant3197]

It would be perfect with my R8, but it feels like I was left out, I bought the 24-105 F4 L almost a year ago 😀 So it's nor affordable if you already own the 24-105 F4 L version lol I do get the sensation, that other photographers almost give me waves because I have a red ring on the Lens, that I must know what I'm doing? lol It would help to keep a lower profile and not look like you have Pro camera where they restrict Pro cameras

[@ColoradoMk4]

How does this compare to an EF 24-70 f2.8 II L series? They say it is equal to an L series but for such a cheaper price I’m skeptical

[@ColoradoMk4]

(Assuming the EF lens is used with the adapter to RF of course)

[@WilkinsonCameras]

The RF 28-70mm F2.8 is solving size and weight issues in a F2.8 zoom lens. An EF 24-70mm F2.8L USM II with an EF-RF adapter weighs 905g and is 137mm longer versus 490g and 92mm in the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM. The EF lens also doesn’t have IS. L series lenses are different animals - both physically and optically built to different standards. This RF lens is weather sealed to L standards, but it is not an L series lens beyond this - different AF motor, different lens coatings and lens element design, and not built to the same “workhorse” standards as an L series lens. So whilst it is a very good lens and it is impressively sharp and I do feel the price point is justified, it isn’t an L. Comparison of this RF 28-70 with an EL 24-70 F2.8L USM II… honestly I couldn’t tell you as I haven’t tested it and it’s been so long since I’ve used the EF lens - and I’ve not actually used it with and of the recent mirrorless cameras. But no IS, being much heavier and bulkier and I also suspect that the AF actually wouldn’t be on a par with this RF 28-70mm - purely because what was fast 12 years ago isn’t what’s considered fast now! It wasn’t designed to keep up with the speed and complexity of modern AF systems because they didn’t exist! Those point above would put me off *buying* an EF 24-70mm F2.8L over this RF 28-70 or the RF 24-105mm F4L. If I already had one, I’d try it out. So personally I wouldn’t want the bulky combination of adapting an EF lens - if I wanted that L glass look and build quality, within this budget, then I’d choose the RF 24-105mm F4 L and sacrifice the F2.8…. And gain the extra 35mm of reach! But everyone has different requirements and budgets to balance and what I prioritise might not be what you prioritise. Hope the above helps (sorry it’s so long, but it’s not always a clear-cut answer!) and thanks for watching 😊

[@bryanboeykens]

I have a Canon R50 and would like to upgrade my kitlenses. What is the better option? Canon RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM (price 1319€) or the Canon RF 24-105mm F/4L IS USM (price 1325€). Thank you!

[@WilkinsonCameras]

This is all covered in the video, so give it a watch 😊 But, you may be better off considering a lens designed for crop-sensor cameras, rather than full-frame cameras... so also check out our Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 RF lens video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnvVcqqMebp1gdU

[@raghavsinghraghu]

Can I get this lens for Canon R50? Please reply 😢

[@WilkinsonCameras]

You can use this lens on your EOS R50, but the equivalent focal length would be 45-112mm. Watch our video where we explain what "crop factor" is (kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWrMY4yngreDgM0) if you don't know what we mean by "equivalent focal length". You'd be better off considering the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN lens in RF mount. We've reviewed that lens here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnvVcqqMebp1gdU

[@raghavsinghraghu]

@@WilkinsonCameras okay 👍

[@PjlphotographyNet]

does it come with a lens hood ?

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Unfortunately, the lens hood isn't included, which was surprising to us as well. However, if you need one, you can purchase the Canon EW-73D lens hood. You can find it here: bit.ly/3B8LuRG.

[@michelecintramika8482]

@@WilkinsonCameras Acho que vem sim com pára-sol.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

@@michelecintramika8482 Infelizmente, descobrimos que um não está incluído! Espero que o Google Tradutor tenha respondido corretamente! Obrigado por assistir 😊

[@ionutfechete6328]

It does not. All non L lenses does not have lens hood included.

[@jamesmgreen15]

Nice job. It does seem to tick several of the key boxes.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

It does! Thanks for watching 😊

[@Hamyhamster24]

this is simimlar price as a used EF 24-70mm 2.8 mark ii. why not just get the EF?

[@WilkinsonCameras]

The RF 28-70mm F2.8 is solving size and weight issues in a F2.8 zoom lens. An EF 24-70mm F2.8LUSM II with an EF-RF adapter weighs 905g and is 137mm longer versus 490g and 92mm in the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM. I’m sure there are people who already do this and it makes perfect sense if you’d already invested so much money into an L series lens and want to carry on using it. But the size, weight and other RF lens mount advantages wouldn’t make an EF alternative a first choice for me.

[@erkkocak]

@@WilkinsonCameras Plus EF 24-70 does not have IS. IS is a must in my opinion for many people both for photo and video work.

[@JamalPhoenix]

Fantastic review but that price is nuts.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thanks 😊 It's a bit eye-watering at first, but I was really taken aback by the quality of it. I think it needs to be considered as a mid-high end lens, not an entry level. In Sony there's standard lenses, G lenses and G Master lenses. Canon don't have a defined middle ground... but in Sony this would be a G series for example. I'd hope to see it bundled with a body or on a when bought with saving of some sort to make the price more... tolerable, but I think when an RF 24-70mm F2.8L lens is currently £2499 RRP... we may have to consider that lens prices these days are generally just a bit nuts!

[@magnoliarailproductions7264]

How? The Canon 17-55 2.8 which was non-L and not full frame was $1200 in 2006 that’s like $1800 with inflation. Seems reasonably priced to this longtime Canon photographer.

[@maxkrde]

I´ve had the 24-70 F2.8 L ... but that one got Stolen :( no i will get this as a replacement.

[@usuallyroamingrob7731]

I wonder if I should sell my RF 24-70 f/2.8 L now haha. Love that compact form factor.

[@MusikPiratCH]

Haha! You'd regret it! 😛

[@usuallyroamingrob7731]

@@MusikPiratCH I know. I love everything about that lens.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

If you're desperate to shed weight from your system, then you could consider it, but the reality is that the 24-70 F2.8L is a superior and superb lens and you'd miss the image quality it gives you. If Canon could make a lighter mark II version of the F2.8L though... that would be nice! (don't get excited, it's not something that we are expecting any time soon!)

[@Originalevo1813]

I think ill be trading my ef 24-70 for this 🙌

[@stephenbarlow2493]

The Canon RF 200-800mm is a non-L weather sealed lens, so this is not the first.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

The RF 200-800mm is described by Canon as being "weather resistant" and "sealed in several locations" whereas the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM is claimed to be the first non-L series lens with the same level of weather sealing as an L series lens.

[@stephenbarlow2493]

@@WilkinsonCameras - I'm not trying to be pedantic here, but there is no formal L standard of weather-proofing, and there never has been. This is not like say, OM system lenses, or Leica, which have IP ratings. Not all EF L lenses have had weather sealing gaskets, even if all the newer RF L lenses do. After the 200-800mm was released, there was much discussion about this in comparison to the 100-500mm. If you look at the Canon diagrams of weather sealing, the 200-800mm, is shown as having full weather sealing gaskets on every area the 100-500mm does. So it is not clear what this means, aside from being marketing speak. If the 28-70mm, has the same weather sealing as an L lens, then what is the weather sealing standard of an L lens? This is not to be found in any Canon literature, and it has never been formally defined. In fact, aside from a red ring, there is no standard of what makes an L lens. Prior to the RF 100-500mm, it was confidently stated, that no L lens, had a smaller aperture than f5.6. This illustrates how Canon L lens standards, are assumed, rather than defined.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

@@stephenbarlow2493 We can only tell you what Canon's product team have told us directly and using readily available facts about this and the 200-800mm - and that's that this is the first non-L series "weather sealed" lens 🙂

[@stephenbarlow2493]

@@WilkinsonCameras - I'm not blaming you, as all the other reviewers are saying this, and obviously this comes from Canon, as other reviewers are saying it. However, Canon themselves put out a diagram, showing the RF 200-800mm, with full weather sealing gaskets, marked in red at every point of ingress. Some lenses (not necessarily Canon), only have weather sealing gaskets on the lens mount. When Canon first described the weather sealing on the 200-800mm, it was assumed, it only had limited weather sealing gaskets. But then Canon released the diagram, showing full weather sealing.

[@wentan8978]

​@@stephenbarlow2493doesn't matter what Canon showed. If Canon didn't say they are fully weather sealed, no one should say that, or it would be misleading.

[@dmytrohryshyn]

I want switch back from mirrorless to DSLR. The new marketing strategy from canon is just ridiculous. If you shooting stills you don't need new fancy toys. Still cameras and lenses are good enough for a long time. I would rather buy two L primes for the price of new non prime RF lens. The video side of things is different.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Don't overlook the amazing autofocus advantages and continuous shooting options on mirrorless cameras and lenses. But if you're happy with your DSLR or prefer DSLRs then you can make the most of secondhand/pre-owned cameras and lenses and save in the process 🙂

[@murbal7679]

You can just adapt the existing EF L primes?

[@dmytrohryshyn]

@@murbal7679 yes, just need Ef to RF adapter

[@nextpicture]

I added to my „R“ an 5D4 and the holy Trinity in F4. All together under 2500€ used but nearly mint. I had 3 copies of the RF 24-105/4 and compared with my EF24-70/4 all performed different and my older EF was allways better on my „R“. I like the mirror viewfinder more and with the Perfect Marketing the Quality of the mirrored viewfinder ist higher then the EVF. Less Energy, more realistic and faster with best Resolution 😂

[@murbal7679]

@@nextpicture Yeah and you can't see the final image, which is the whole point of the EVF

[@simonmaduxx6777]

Is it me of does that bokeh look....rough (9:50) especially The character of it looks almost mushy. Otherwise I appreciate the candor of the opinion here. There are real caveats, including that unfortunate switch.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Hi, 9:50 is the very end of the video… did you mean another section? Happy to take a look, but not sure which image/video sample you are referring to. And thank you - we try to offer honest reviews from real user perspectives so it’s great to hear that this has come across 😊

[@simonmaduxx6777]

@@WilkinsonCameras Hi! Thanks for asking so nicely, I’m obliged to answer (+ new subscribe)

these screens stood out to me. I cant put my finger on it, but there is a gobble gook, liquidly character to the oof…needs more samples of course, but thats also quite a few examples already 2:22 - rock formations (could be just iq?) 3:20 distance of greenery 3:25 just ‘odd’ character 3:40 same odd bokeh 6:01 neither here nor there, this one a is a big test of overall bokeh quality as well
 It leaves me confused. It was already out there the the bokeh was compromised somewhat (camerlabs preview). Definitely have to get one in hand. We all want this to be as good as it can be, because it’s not like canon gives us a lot of options..and soemtimes no options at all (50 1.4cough) Cheers from NYC!

[@MosleydollMUA]

Do you think this is a better option than the RF sigma 18-50m f2.8 ? I have the r7 and I know the sigma is for my specific sensor but idc about the focal length. I’m talking build quality and optical quality . Thank you

[@CZOV]

Overpriced like hell in UK. But how much of this lens is real optics and how much software corrections? Nobody on youtube will tell us. Hmmm.

[@BruceLeroyUK]

3:00 as if 😂😂😂. Nope it doesn't.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

😅

[@ilichnguyen587]

I will buy it for 1000 USD

[@FeRoOOo71]

still expensive, i can add 400$ and buy rf lens

[@toddswindell7072]

I think a little much $$$

[@superstringsbro]

Not wide enough. 24mm to start and i would've bought this

[@okaro6595]

There is already 24-70 mm f/2.8. The whole point of this is that it is cheaper and lighter.

[@murbal7679]

Then buy the existing 24-70 f2.8 😂

[@superstringsbro]

@@murbal7679 I don’t want a brick 🧱

[@superstringsbro]

@@murbal7679 I don’t want to carry a brick 🧱

[@superstringsbro]

@@okaro6595 but not wide enough and the one you mention is too big and heavy

[@mareksykora3891]

what the fucking noise at background?!!

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Sorry… not sure what you’re talking about? Do you want to leave a time stamp so we can understand and also maybe not swear at us 😅

[@trainspoted]

Price is unacceptable, period

[@usuallyroamingrob7731]

Says who? It's actually quite competitive with the competition.

[@magnoliarailproductions7264]

How? The Canon 17-55 2.8 which was non-L and not full frame was $1200 in 2006 that’s like $1800 with inflation. Seems reasonably priced to this longtime Canon photographer.

[@goldenstasgs]

This is not L lens for 1300€ in Europe? It’s joke? STM lens are not sharp, have lot of flaring, chromatic aberration and lack of water resistance. It’s nonsense.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

@@goldenstasgs have you watched the video? The lens is whether sealed and optically very good with no concerning CA, flare and very sharp and detailed images.

[@driftlessgeardemos]

That hasn’t been my experience with the stm lenses. The 35 or 50 haven’t been my favorite, but the 85 outperformed my ef 85 f1.2 by a long shot, especially in terms of contrast, ca and flaring

[@goldenstasgs]

Yes I watched the video. You have no test in it for sharpness or chromatic aberration. You could post on KZbin photos from iPhone and it be the same. Watch review for rf 24-70 f2.8 of Christofer Frost. He has technique to test it correctly. You could see CA for 24-70 f2.8. And it’s normal for zoom lens. Just avoid demonstrations photos without testing and telling customers that 28-70 f2.8 has no CA because it’s impossible.

[@goldenstasgs]

@@driftlessgeardemosrf 85 mm f2.0 is amazing lens I agree my friend. Sharp from corner to corner wide open. I have rf 85mm f1.2 but it’s heavy 😅but I love it.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

@@goldenstasgs Last time I'll be replying to you on this because you don't seem to be understanding and you clearly haven't listened to the video properly or read my replies properly. One thing our channel doesn't do is post lens charts or pixel peep into the very smallest part of the corner of the image. We post real-life, real usage tests and examples and comment based on our experience... exactly what I've done here. Final reply from me, but do feel free to keep them coming because the engagement is great for our views 👍

[@goldenstasgs]

It’s not true. You removed chromatically aberration in all photos. Even 24-70 f2.8 has a lot of it. I don’t like when you lie to your customers. I have r5m2, r2 and 8 rf L lens. I’m canon customer. But don’t lie about your lens please.

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Wow - I don't like it when people say I'm lying to them. It wouldn't benefit our company or me to lie about a lens we're selling, and it would only result in unhappy customers.. so why would I do that? First off - the photos are mostly straight out of camera jpegs - a couple had exposure adjuments from the RAW files due to me underexposing in a couple of scenarios. You must be mad if you think I have the time or inclination to manually remove CA from so many image samples in post. Second... I actually said "no noticeable aberrations" and that Canon designed the lens to have minimal CA. Definitely one of the rudest comments I've ever had on this channel, so I think perhaps it's not the channel for you.

[@usuallyroamingrob7731]

Nonsense, the RF 24-70 f/2.8 L IS USM an amazing lens.

[@goldenstasgs]

You don’t need real comment from canon customers who already spent 50k for canon equipment? 24-105 f4, 24-105 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8 have significant chromatic aberration and blurred in close images wide open. But it doesn’t mean it’s bad lens. I have it all. And you telling me 28-70 f2.8 has no aberration at all? This is a lie. It has. And more than L lens I mentioned.

[@goldenstasgs]

@@usuallyroamingrob7731watch Christopher Frost review rf 24-70 f2.8for chromatic aberration in the end of the video. It’s amazing lens and I have it. But it had CA. I’m telling canon avoid disturbing information that is not true.

[@Zenutheduck-to4nr]

​@goldenstasgs This lens was literally announced not even 12 hours ago and you're an expert on it? You sound bitter and arrogant.

[@Dammy1998]

Great review. Really enjoyed seeing your range of photos

[@WilkinsonCameras]

Thank you! Lovely to hear that you enjoyed it - thanks for watching 😊