Learn some core concepts in RF Design with the team in our latest session! ►GET STARTED autode.sk/2DWUHgC FREE TRIAL | autode.sk/2T1920C SUBSCRIBE | autode.sk/2DWeb4W
Пікірлер: 27
@JamesKao3D5 жыл бұрын
I love the concept for this webcast where a subject matter expert explores designs via the tool live. It's extremely useful since the kinds of things that Joel does while altering the design (e.g. moving the polygons around, trying different trace widths) are things that real prototypers will do and can learn from, not only from the design principles but also from the Eagle usage tips that Jorge chimes in on. Awesome!
@ingmarm88583 жыл бұрын
Where's the subject matter expert? I see a dude who kind of sort of thinks maybe you don't need to worry about using a microstrip or CPWG if the track length is less than 1/4 wave!!! Then fumbles around saying that all you need to do is trim the IFA (inverted F antenna) a bit to get an appropriate impedance match to the transceiver without completely revisiting the matching network. "Oh well maybe you'll get a little attenuation but you can fudge it". The way to do this is to use a VNA or proper simulation tool followed by the VNA. The magic spectrum analyser will do nothing for you in this scenario except show you relative field strength. No doubt he can layout PCB but not RF and he shouldn't be presented as anything that resembles a design reference for RF. Caveat Emptor just because you saw it on the internet doesn't make it right!
@CodeJeffo2 жыл бұрын
Great content. More of these!!!
@simonndungu11965 жыл бұрын
Quite good, Thanks
@Leif_YT3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for publishing such videos - it was a very interesting and helpful content.
@zhitailiu38763 жыл бұрын
in 2-layer board, the transmission line should be coplanar setup.
@spsarolkar3 жыл бұрын
Nice video, I have question regarding ground plane , is it required to have ground plane on the bottom layer opposite to pcb trace antena? in some places its mentioned we need to have ground plane on opposite layer of antena trace, so it would be good if you clarify that
@wolfganglienbacher4 жыл бұрын
I agree with James Kao about how cool this format is. But I really have to admit that this also demonstrates to me once again how painful Eagle is to use. We are about to have 2020, and it is still as painful as it was when I used it in school in the very early 2000s. I really hope Autodesk is going to improve this significantly in the forseeable future, although I am afraid this is asking too much. Let me add I do not want to believe it actually is asking to much.
@3167282372 жыл бұрын
HOW DETERMINE ANTENNA WIDTH AND SHAPE OF TRACE?
@seshansesha76454 жыл бұрын
Very useful , Thank you.
@tejeshwvardhan11653 жыл бұрын
for 1.6 mm FR4, the width has to be around 3mm to match impedance. the result are still not satisfactory! the impedance matching is for path or antenna?
@timonsku5 жыл бұрын
What is the use of the via with the grounded PCB antenna? It just sits somwhere randomly close to the outgoing trace but seems like it could just as well be omitted?
@AutodeskEAGLE5 жыл бұрын
Hi Prof. Sparkles! May you please specify where you see this? Thanks
@akshayjoshi25384 жыл бұрын
Hello Prof. Sparkles, As frequency of signal flowing through circuit increases,Impedance becomes prime concern, And as we know current follows least impedance path, It must have to switch between the planes. Vias provides least impedance path to current. So it is better to put vias near high frequency traces.
@gharbisalem12545 жыл бұрын
I think it will be important if you put shielding vias around antenna traces too?
@AutodeskEAGLE5 жыл бұрын
Hi Gharbi! Thanks for your question. Shielding vias around antenna traces will in most cases hamper the antennas performance. In fact it's imperative that you avoid having any ground plane underneath the antenna. Cheers!
@gharbisalem12545 жыл бұрын
@@AutodeskEAGLE sorry i'm meant by that stitching the antenna output trace before even designing the antenna . thank you for your response
@ashaychugani49403 жыл бұрын
Whats the residence of the resistors that were added next to the ufl connector?
@darshanpithadiya82073 жыл бұрын
I think 0 ohm
@darshanpithadiya82073 жыл бұрын
For isolating UFL and PCB antenna
@gatlingword4 жыл бұрын
easy neck form ham ?
@SSnoWHand3 жыл бұрын
www.eznec.com - EZNec it seems.
@anneallison64023 жыл бұрын
hahaha I searched for the same hahahaha
@guilhermefarenzena70833 жыл бұрын
Can you send me the bill of material in excel file ?