Richard Lazarus on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife

[@self_wrought_thicket]

Awesome series, would love to see more.

[@Thelegalcommonsense1463]

I'm so appreciative for this platform.

[@rurikmckaiser543]

Dear Prof Lazarus. I would be awesome to have that very lecture you refer to as a KZbin episode or series. It would be GREAT to experience the fruits of your excellent primary research.

[@ruchpat1]

Thank you Harvard Law School for posting this video.

[@jvb5590]

Do more of these, please.

[@marelimiranda6713]

Would love to see more, very helpful

[@MilgrineGenio]

It is just that no one can fault Justice Scalia for interpreting the law strictly to the letter.

[@yuzhengwang6309]

But the faultiness IS interpreting the law strictly to the letter sometimes, because framers thought of a piece of law to be principles not strict rules in the common law tradition, not only talking about the Constitution, but also other statutes.

[@rktsnail]

How is this about Scalia?

[@mukutchetiatsk5415]

Very good