Is Your 5G Tower Safe? Ofcom 5G Audits

► Buy me a coffee: www.paypal.me/...
► Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @ringwaymanchester
► Email: [e-mail]
► Instagram: / m3hhyofficial
► Facebook: / m3hhy
► Twitter: / officialm3hhy
The Idiots Guide To 5G - I Received A Weird PSYOPS Letter!
• The Idiots Guide To 5G...
In this instalment we look at 5G safety and the audits the government take to ensure cell towers stay within safe limits.
They emit non-ionising radiation and are completely safe.

[@Shiver2002]

All those people burning down towers and such keep me employed!

[@JimAllen-Persona]

Every cloud does have a silver lining 😂😂

[@Vtarngpb]

That’s positive thinking 🤣

[@HogwartsBasement]

Why when I connect to 4g is it incapable of doing anything where before it was okay.

[@paulklasmann1218]

... but be careful, two cell antenna installers were shot dead somewhere in the US by these lunatics.

[@danielt.8573]

You're a fireman or do you sell matchboxes? :)

[@stevesmyth4982]

During the first wave of covid my neighbour told me that 5G spreads the disease, I had to try hard to not laugh and realised that it would be impossible for him to understand inverse sqaure law.

[@xbm41]

if ur near a 5g tower it will cause damages like cancer. maybe some autoimmune for the time being in the 5g, but not permament.

[@jessicamorgan3073]

​@@xbm41 Did you watch the video? 🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

[@stevesmyth4982]

@xbm41 The cancer research UK website states; Do mobile phones cause cancer? No. Using mobile phones does not increase the risk of cancer. And there aren't any good explanations for how mobile phones could cause cancer. You might have heard rumours that electromagnetic radiation or electromagnetic waves from phones are dangerous. But the radiation that mobile phones or phone masts transmit and receive is very weak. It does not have enough energy to damage DNA so is highly unlikely to be able to cause cancer. Research is continuing to make sure there aren’t any potential long-term effects on cancer risk, but none have been found so far.

[@allancopland1768]

@@xbm41 Which bit of the video didn't you understand?

[@Shiver2002]

@@xbm41 Maybe if you put the transmitters inside your bedroom.. Beyond the compound, you're fine..

[@terryjwood]

My dad was testing a new tri-band beam antenna that he was assembling. He forgot to turn the transmitter off before he touched the antenna to make an adjustment. As he got within inches of the antenna, I saw a white-blue arc zap him on his hand. He howled in pain. He'd received an RF burn. It didn't look bad at the time, but within 24 hours it was easy to see that he'd been burned. It took a few weeks to heal and he was OK. But I never forgot the lesson to ALWAYS power down the transmitter when working on ham radio antennas!

[@UnitSe7en]

That's not what an RF burn is. The hint is in the name: "Radio" A HF spark is not an RF burn. Your dad received a high-frequency electrical shock, not a radio burn. An RF burn is caused by emitted radiation in the radio frequency band. Example: Standing in front of a transmitting microwave dish.

[@terryjwood]

@@UnitSe7en I guess I should stop drying my hair by defeating the safety in the microwave oven and opening the door.

[@UnitSe7en]

@@terryjwood Probably. But it's your call.

[@paulklasmann1218]

How many Watts was going into it?

[@terryjwood]

@@paulklasmann1218 I've always thought he was testing with 100 watts. But his transmitter was a Viking Invader 2000, capable of full legal power. He had to replace his tri-band beam from the 1950s because it had been hit by lighting. So he was tuning the new Hy-Gain beam he had just put together. Looking back at that memory now, I can't understand why he was using so much power. Ten or twenty watts should have been enough to test with. But I'll never forget seeing it arc to his hand and him yelling in pain. I also clearly remember telling him that it looked OK -- that he just got shocked -- and him telling me that he'd been burned like this before and it was going to look terrible the next day. And sure enough, he showed me his black and blue hand with dark tissue where he's been burned. The experience has convinced me to always turn my rig off when I'm making a change to my antenna system.

[@jerrykardash9037]

Excellent job, Ringway! Very thorough, as always. I've been working for a major carrier from 2g thru 5g for the last 29 years and every time I think I have something you overlooked, you go on to cover it later in the vid. (This one and the last one on 5g) You really have a passion for radio that shows and it makes your vids great. The same people who think they are being harmed by rf are the same ones that complain about poor signal! No helping them...

[@stuwyatt]

I'd love to know if this story is true. It was told to me by my dad many years ago (who spent a few years putting up transmitters for Paknet) When the first analogue cell towers were being put up by Cellnet back in the day, we saw the same crazy conspiracy nonsense that we're currently seeing with 5G. In one instance, a tower had been built in the middle of a large housing estate, and very quickly people started reporting they were feeling unwell. After a public outcry (backed up by a tabloid if I remember right), Cellnet organised a public meeting, and it was packed. One by one, the residents took turns to explain how bad the headaches were, as well as other symptoms such as hearing noises, losing balance etc. The Cellnet representatives listened patiently to them all. When no more public wished to speak, the Cellnet site engineer stood up and briefly explained that only the infrastructure had been built, and that they were a month away from fitting the internal hardware. Nothing had actually been switched on yet. The equipment wasn't even on site. :)

[@RCAvhstape]

It's totally true, as far back as the 90s people were afraid of cell towers. And even today some people are afraid of radio towers of any type, as well as electric transmission lines.

[@stuwyatt]

@@RCAvhstape I know the conspiracy nonsense existed back then (I'm currently 52, so remember it all from my youth), but it's the Cellnet public meeting story that I'd love to verify as being true. It sounded as though Cellnet purposefully set up the conspiracy nuts and the tabloids, and let them create a massive hype about it. This would have all taken place sometime in the 80's. He was told the story by an engineer he worked with after Cellnet and Paknet merged, but trying to verify any of it has been impossible. Maybe someone reading the post has also heard the story and it can all be traced and verified as true? It would make for a great video if true :)

[@MiltonGrimshaw]

Yep, that is true

[@pomonabill220]

I bet the Cellnet reps were REALLY trying hard NOT to laugh! Would have been funny to see the looks on the faces of the residents!

[@RCAvhstape]

@@pomonabill220 I bet they weren't laughing. Scared people vote. And I don't think they're all stupid, some are just misinformed and they'd been lied to in the past about things like tobacco and leaded gasoline. The telecom companies don't get trust for free.

[@imnotgivingmyname_toamachine]

I got about halfway through the video before I realized I don't work on towers anymore and don't need my annual RFR awareness training. 😂

[@Vtarngpb]

😅

[@markiangooley]

Mobile phones distract people while they’re driving. Deadly!

[@WOFFY-qc9te]

Tru but not as much the flat screen used to control all the car functions through multi layered menus. But you do have a camera to record the crash.

[@UKsystems]

@@WOFFY-qc9te not really the car man use a design to be simplistic and you can often change settings to have different levels of simplicity. They’re designed that you can click things. They’re not designed to watch Netflix and be distracted.

[@UKsystems]

If someone is stupid enough to be using their phone when driving if they get killed, it’s simply their own decisions that have done that

[@ptonpc]

The number of people who walk around glued to their phone and completely oblivious to their surroundings, is something sane people should be worried about.

[@EgoChip]

The real danger with mobile phones is what people use them to access, like social media and the like. Not the technology itself. As usual, it's people.

[@Volfmech]

The problem with trying to reason with idiots, is that they'll beat you with experience.

[@dw7920]

Precisely THIS. 🤣

[@KarenLopez-in5ih]

Try reasonimg with a woman..she will destroy society with emotions.temper tantrums mood swings......

[@ashleystyles6888]

you mean concerned citizens? whats your skin in the game? isnt the internet fast enough for you? or are you a farmer with one of these on your land you are getting paid for?

[@Volfmech]

@@ashleystyles6888 Womp womp

[@UKsystems]

@@ashleystyles6888 the differences it’s okay to be concerned but when you are educated by a professional on the safety if you then say you’re more experienced because of a conspiracy theory then you become an idiot it’s fine to be concerned but the minute you watch a video like this educating you on the safety you no longer need to be concerned

[@charlesmurphy5644]

Mankind has evolved to hear what they want to hear, and disregard anything that might make them have to think… The idiots have taken over😿

[@greenockscatman]

Taking a bit of cash off of people who believe this nonsense might not be the worst thing the gov't has done. I say let them do it.

[@GamingKing545]

maybe it will bring them back to reality

[@binky_bun]

Cast some blocks of epoxy resin with some metal swarf in it sell them as "Orgone 5G tower busters" on eBay. The gullible idiots buy them and bury them at the bottom of towers or chuck them in the compound and stuff. Gets rid of the sweepings off the workshop floor and excess resin and turns it into beer money. A fool and his money are soon parted.

[@Tr3yM34]

An inspection should be necessary for such equipment, sounds like your so wrapped up with hating "conspiracy theorists" you forget about maintenance and safety in general and just hate anyone who has concern for anything. Very smart why would conspiracy theorists trust or even pay for a government inspection and why would they pay the government at all?

[@ashleystyles6888]

@@Tr3yM34 yup they sound like communists because, at this point, its looking like this is the only explanation

[@UKsystems]

@@Tr3yM34 the difference is genuine concern does not need the people to pay money for an inspection as if you believe there is a genuine issue. The company operating equipment will carry out a few tests however when he concerns our conspiracy theorist concerns and not real issues the real world concerns are generally just if there’s too much power there will be interference will be interference.

[@jomukuk1950]

Tell them to hold the radiation detector close to their microwave oven when it is being used - that'll flummox them!

[@MacGuffin1]

If your microwave oven is emitting RF, then it's broken and dangerous, those metal lines on the window are RF shielding (faraday cage). If you want to test 5G on the cheap with amazon RF field meter then learn how to wind a bandpass filter. It's the phones that are the danger(if at all) not the towers. We know it is very likely a very low level carcinogen at a minimum, beyond that we cant say much (thus far) but some frequencies and modulation types can break apart specific proteins , your body cleans up broken cells (cancer or otherwise) all the time, but keep your phones away from kids as the cells are most vulnerable during cell division(5G or any G)

[@RCAvhstape]

@@MacGuffin1 Well, then, just be sure your oven isn't leaky you might want to check it out.

[@jomukuk1950]

@@MacGuffin1 I know. All microwaves emit a small amount of microwave radiation.

[@UKsystems]

@@MacGuffin1 actually there is a safe exposure to microwave radiation and microwave just needs to admit less than that as the shielding can be slightly faulty, but still safe

[@Chainsaw-ASMR]

@@MacGuffin1 Microwaves ovens can interfere with WiFi @2.4ish ghz. How do they interfere without emitting something?

[@FAMUCHOLLY]

No matter how hard you try to explain basic physics and biochemistry to people, there will still be more than enough willing to believe absolute nonsense about health effects from 5G...

[@wulliest]

These are the same people who'll happily lie in a MRI scanner at the local hospital, under a coil, being pulsed with RF from a 35Kw amplifier.

[@750triton]

Big Clive put this to bed (for me) some years ago. I was told "I'm not taking advice from some old bloke in a shed" 😂

[@750triton]

@DaveLongcock 🤣 may well have been. It was a whie ago, memory fogs

[@Richardincancale]

0:57 Hope that tin-foil is SPF 50, not just the 30 of your cream!

[@MissFoxification]

Their little minds can't get around the fact that "hazardous up close" and "hazardous at a distance" are not the same thing. It's like fire, at a distance it's fine, the closer you get, the warmer it gets.. eventually you get burned. Wait until they learn about electricity and what that can do.

[@garethaethwy]

Cue Fr Ted explaining cows to Fr Dougal...

[@MeteorMark]

Very apt analogie!

[@nozhki-busha]

Scientific illiteracy is a scary thing...

[@handlesshouldntdefaulttonames]

I BLINKED as your subliminal message was popping on screen and nearly screamed.

[@Electronics-Rocks]

One main point I make is that 5g frequencies were used by other communications at a factor of 10 or 100 times more powerful over the last 40 years like analogue TV! So you might as well fear the power of teletubbies power levels being more than 5G!!! So death by 5G is like saying death caused by teletubbies!!!😂 So radiation has dropped with 5G power saving & beam forming!!!

[@StuffJason437]

Keep in mind, that " 5G " means 5th generation and has no relation to the frequency.

[@greatestytcommentator]

Apparently a group of "Heroes" just mobbed a team of transmitter installers from erecting a pole...

[@EgoChip]

People can be so ignorant, it's dangerous. They don't care about science or facts. They have their narrative and that's all that matters to them. I remember people saying the same thing about 3G and 4G, and even microwave ovens. People hear the word "Radiation" and don't understand it and the different types. Even visible light is radiation. I guess they should blind themselves and stay in a completely dark location to be safe.

[@ptonpc]

People are. UYrggh..

[@arthurbrotleibe1528]

I've debunked these 2 Op-amps and an LNA 30MHz - 6GHz current to voltage converter, crank meters the Conspiracy Theorists run round with 0.5 miles from a 5KW DTV transmitter but think it's the 5G mast. The manufacturers of these are absolute grifters. But you try to explain that UV is 6 million to 100 million times the electron volts of mobile communications, or that infrared photon energy at room temperature is 200,000x the wave magnitude (Watts) of a 5G mast, and they just hit you with the Telegram or Grifter Studies (Overload) over about 15 consecutive posts. Which obviously, as Einstein said; "If you can't explain it simply, you do not understand it well enough!"

[@MrSlipstreem]

I'm glad the government have eventually introduced a stupidity tax.

[@garethaethwy]

JUST TAX THE STUPID PEOPLE!

[@PaulTaylor1]

The people who hold to these conspiracy theories basically believe in magic. They don't understand radio so they think this stuff is a magic force that does to us whatever their thought-leaders say it does.

[@onurbespinar]

I dont believe to conspiracy theories (sometimes i do but not all) :) but as a engineer i can clearly say that any ghz frequency with enaugh power is dangerous. microwave ovens works on 2.45 ghz @ 1000W apprx. Cell towers puts out 30w or 50w (depends on location) and that means towers are not totally harmless.

[@Numbnuts-]

So you wouldn't turn it off when working on the tower, lol

[@chlo2820]

EMF is invisible, there are frequencies passing us every minute.

[@soundslike8454]

Your preamble was pure class lol

[@DeputatKaktus]

There was a case here in Germany where a group of people from an area where a new 5G base station was erected, wrote to the carrier running it. They expressed serious concerns about 5G and it harmful effects and how some people were already negatively affected by the radiation from the tower. They got a reply from the carrier that basically said that they were taking the concerns of the population very seriously and work closely with other authorities and would take every conceivable measure to prevent harm from coming to the population yaddah yaddah... And then the letter closed with a sentence that basically said "We will monitor all available health data very closely once the tower is taking up operations".

[@Allan_aka_RocKITEman]

Lewis, at about 00:44 in this video: *_"Summer has arrived in Britain."_* As I understand UK weather, THAT STATEMENT ALONE is quite significant...🤭 *EDIT→* I was born & raised in Saint Petersburg, Florida, USA. I also lived in Dade County, Florida, USA {not too far from Miami} from 1988 to 1995. The _HAZARDS_ of excessive Sun exposure are nothing new for me.

[@AdamSWL]

Excellent video as always Lewis! This is why it is a good idea when putting up antennas and you have neighbours. Leave the antenna unplugged with the cable clearly showing as disconnected. That way when Ethel next door starts complaining of headaches that mysteriously started when the antenna went up, just point to the unterminated cable and let her know it is not even connected! It's like when Smart Meters for electricity were introduced. Oh the headaches and nightmares they were causing 🤕

[@franklinwerren7684]

That is the same nuts that wants to limit power output on ham radios, I use 100 watts max on any number of HF bands even though 1500 watts is allowed. I have been exposed to em fields for 69 years and no problem here. In my area, the ones who die early are the smokers and drinkers. The biggest em exposers is 60 hz in the average household (50 hz in other parts of the world.).😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 DE N2JYG

[@jhonsiders6077]

I have my stuff as a teenager all tube Johnsons and a 2 KW amp id say my letters but now they can be looked up online They get more from walking under a powerline !!

[@mstrawn69]

When we first turned up the analog cellular network in San Diego in the 80's, the cell site transmitted at 100 watts ERP, mobiles and bag phones transmitted at 3 watts and the first handheld portables were a 1/4 Watt. Most of the NIMBY's (Not In My Back Yard) were in rich neighborhoods and they complained about cell sites affecting them but since they were the only once that could afford personal cell phones, they also bitched that they didn't have coverage in their house. With more sites, frequency reuse and output power was reduced to prevent co-channel interference. Now there is a site on every corner at much lower power, everyone is using smart phones which have lower power.

[@mstrawn69]

@@Ron_Leonard In 2001 there is a good chance they got on an analog site over on the horizon. Cell site antennas are down-tilted to improve building coverage. Anything intentionally pointed into the air is wasted RF energy. A site on the horizon would have had line of site.

[@allancopland1768]

I wonder if the tinfoil hat brigade realise that the aerials (I'm British!) on a cell tower direct almost all the RF outwards rather than downwards.

[@johnnorth9355]

I am naturally sceptical about claims that support or pooh pooh concerns and prefer to look at evidence especially any changes in the population that can seen seen over a period of time. In my mind there is a clear correlation between the use of mobile phones and the general increase in stupidity of the population as evidenced over the past two decades. I challenge anyone to dispute this. 73. M7BLC

[@GamingKing545]

the internet allowed the fast spread of misinfo

[@MacGuffin1]

Yes, the truth lies in between the out-there and the 'nothing to see here, buy more phones' TLDR is try to keep your phone a short distance from yourself when using it for extended periods and keep phones away from kids and areas of the body that have high rates of cell-division (ie; reproductive organs) This applies to 5 or any other G and dont worry about the towers

[@TheNewSchmoo]

Correllation is not the same thing as causation

[@GaryB007]

Evolution has gone into reverse.

[@RCAvhstape]

Television used to be the main transmitter of stupidity, but it's been surpassed by more recent tech.

[@southcalder]

Near where I grew up, some of the locals organised a protest and actually set fire to some of the equipment the contractors were using to install the foundation for a base station (pre 5G). Through the middle of the housing estate are two 400kV transmission lines leading to the massive substation adjacent, and part of the neighbouring industrial estate was found to be contaminated with Radium from a former clock manufacturer. Both of which are proven to be far more detrimental to your health than any RF base could ever be. But yeah, let’s all get bent out of shape about a radio mast.

[@SallySallySallySally]

Back before cell phones, I remember coming across an antenna on the top of a hill deep in the woods around a small suburban town outside my city. I learned that it was some kind of beacon used for aircraft navigation into my city's large international airport 50 miles away. I didn't get very close to it because, on weather-beaten signs surrounding it, it said, "WARNING: Do not approach closer than 100 feet." I heeded those warnings and I'm still healthy decades later.

[@WOFFY-qc9te]

Tin Foil Tuesday...... I expect you also believe the world is an oblate spheroid

[@bhoogvliet]

The world is a donut 😂

[@penrar]

Toroidal physics would agree with you.

[@KHoos]

Thanks for sharing this and having the patience to explain it again (and again..)

[@shanestephenon4262]

😂🤣😂Love the intro haha! Re emission levels- I work in masts fairly seldomly on the older kits the wattage is higher than it should be which would obviously increase the levels. this is usually human error. The newer systems you can't increase as easily or they're standard sets in my experience in my area.

[@johnorrells3797]

What makes me laugh is the same people that complain about the rf from masts are happy to stick a phone to the side of their head

[@markt.3454]

Nicely done!!

[@pqrstzxerty1296]

Please note all 3G 4G as LTE and ALTE 5G are all the same Its really called 3.95G technolgy not to be confused with Wifi. New 5.2G is called 3.97G and 3.99G 6G is here, on test by Samsung in Manchester. Also note even if your phone says you are connected to 5G you are proberly connected to 4G relabelled. It a consumer scam rippoff.

[@sealandersoundscapes6403]

The entire thing has been a rip off of, all of these supposed steps are just LTE(long Term Environment) each step we move further is just a reasonable excuse to charge the consumer for something that already existed other than parts of the wider infrastructure at switching sites being uprated or replaced something that would need to be sorted out anyway.

[@pqrstzxerty1296]

@@sealandersoundscapes6403 I Wish more people talk about this. EE as Tmobile kept it at 3.95G labeled as LTE so they did not have to pay for a Ofcom 4G licence. All 4G and 5G really is, is more phone line channels. The more you pay is the more channels you get. More nnñ channels more higher download rate. I think its 16 3.5G channels for LTE and 32 for 5G and 128 for 5.2G The more channel gives you more highter download rate. As there an no voice lines, these are now called data only lines as Channels and gives you internet and internet voip.

[@spiritusinfinitus]

If only the Earth was actually flat because then we wouldn't need as many of these new fangled contraptions! 😅

[@everlast2658]

It is,it is also stationary

[@spiritusinfinitus]

@@everlast2658 Cool story, bro. How do you explain how my satellite broadband works?

[@haraldclark6206]

Excellent and calm information, thank you!

[@MiddayDolomite]

From 8:13, it looks like a little robot from an alien planet is having a day out on Earth, investigating everything it can see.

[@mooncowtube]

A fine, careful, measured and informative video -- thank you so much. I particularly enjoyed the start 🙂

[@Doubleelforbes]

I had to drop the speed to .25 to see the hidden truth. Nice backdrop!

[@garethaethwy]

took me a few goes with pause, back a bit, damn, back a bit more, got it in the end. As you say, well worth the effort...

[@lewispommells234]

Any chance of a video on the Bilsdale transmitter fire and subsequent efforts to provide services?

[@irreverend_]

You said 19 million but showed 1.9 million twice there, just so you know

[@bingbong7316]

Is it possible to passively "milk" 5G RF to power an LED or similar? Probably not, but the idea amuses me.

[@oscodains]

I’ve seen it done with other similarly relatively low-power signals like wi-fi. a single LED. Makes you think Tesla wasn’t all that mad, and funny to think how ridiculous the power output would have to be to get useful power out of radio waves. If you have a spare LED and some spare wire to cut into an 5G antenna, should be easy to test out.

[@allancopland1768]

Please don't give the 'Facebook reel' Free Energy people any more silly ideas ... LOL!

[@jhonsiders6077]

you can walk under a hiline tower and light up a 8 foot fluorescent tube dont touch the ends !!! we take small ones tape to out mobile antennas key the mic it glows back during the CB craze I used to pull under a gas station with my 10 meter rig and light up the tubes all around the island !! same with a 250 watt amp on the CB LOL great fun in the day .

[@ProfSimonHolland]

we live is a cell phone desert...only phone signal is from a distant 3g antenna 5 km away...why? our council has blocked cell tower construction in our village on aesthetic and health grounds....the irony is... the council are promoting us as 'the technological village of tomorrow ' ... or maybe ... life in the stone age!

[@ynot6473]

as a licensed amateur radio operator, i am much more concerned about the quality of the power supplies used. how well are they filtered? ie, how much rf noise will they produce?

[@UKsystems]

For professional mobile phone infrastructure, they generally use the highest end gear they possibly can

[@oldengineer464]

Sense at last, thank you.

[@jmr]

We'll know he's trolling trolls if the next video is him demonstrating the inverse square law with a fart. 😂 /teasing

[@RingwayManchester]

😂😂👍🏻

[@itechflagstaff]

Might need the ideal gas law for this scenario 😲

[@jmr]

@@itechflagstaff I wouldn't call that gas "ideal". 😅

[@itechflagstaff]

@@jmr 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@atlanticx100]

At first, I thought I was in a time slip and it was the 1st of April 2024 LOL

[@itechflagstaff]

Thanks again, another great video.

[@RingwayManchester]

Thank you so much!

[@mickgatz214]

I enjoy and respect your vidz 10/4 good buddy...👍

[@wisteela]

I love your style. I saw it coming, but it was still brilliant. I'm planning to get a cheap EMF meter just for curiosity.

[@brettjames8821]

Awesome video, Do you know much info about the radio site/nuclear bunker in sussex called king standing. I heard it was the worlds strongest transmitter in ww2. Apparently BBC still have an emergency studio there

[@ianflint4610]

Probably best to suggest to the conspiracy theorists that they needn't be worried about 5G, but, if they are, they should switch off their WiFi - similar technology working in a similar way at similar frequencies but deployed right at their side in their own home. Would be a good idea to move as far away from tv and radio transmission towers as possible and turn their tv and radios off. They all use the same radio encoding but at much much higher powers. Maybe too they should hide under a lead lined umbrella to stop satellite transmissions. Also not a good idea to have a microwave either. All that microwave energy creeping through those little holes in the door.

[@mrtwinky2007]

8:39 the tests are done in 2011 before the rollout of mmWave 30-100GHz signals compared to 800MHz to 3GHz the tests should be done again on mmWave stations because saying 5G to anyone they haven't a clue what it really means which is 5th gen and part of the new agreed upon spec is the inclusion of mmWave frequences being rolled out around the world in countries that choose to support that part of the spec, which mmWave test areas are where people complained.

[@RingwayManchester]

They’re still done this year and the results are the same….

[@NeneExists]

I still have a numb patch on my finger from an RF burn 25 years ago. It was not fun.

[@Counsellingtutor1]

Lewis, I’m not sure I agree with your point. Just last Sunday, I took a raw chicken, stuck it in a bag, and left it on top of a 5G tower. Half an hour later, the chicken was cooked! Mind you, by Monday, the whole family ended up in A+E with salmonella poisoning.

[@colintinker7778]

It always surprises me that drones can go up close to transmitter masts and don't show any issues despite being directly in the path of high levels of RF energy.

[@Vtarngpb]

0:25 bro you forgot about Mom’s spaghetti… guessing you also forgot about..

[@tonystone9367]

Baz Luhrmann Wear Sunscreen !

[@kevinjbakertribe]

Track measurement train - nice 😊

[@TouYubeTom]

can you also do a video on the potential hazards of radar surveillance systems for airborne and maritime traffic? regards

[@TheBigdog868]

I would finish the video but the radiation from my smart meter is cooking me alive in my bed. So I'm going to go smoke a few cigarettes and drink some whiskey and try again later.

[@oldshep2695]

Well done on this subject.... I was needing more tin foil !!! you saved me...LMFAO

[@ardeladimwit]

I think you forgot the most basic danger that climbing or being on a tower can in itself be dangerous simply because of height and human misjudgement of personal prowess. Being either a steeplejack or lineman is inherently hazardous work. Being an idiot with a telephone is always a hazard whether on ground, in a car, on a plane or in the water.

[@jack_2000]

Were the images and video at the start taken around Mam Tor, Peak District, by any chance? I was there recently, I'm sure I saw a tower there, which looked like that actually.

[@RingwayManchester]

Yes! Sharon edge! Well spotted

[@circattle]

There’s little danger from Layer 1. It’s Layer 7 we should really be wary of.

[@MacGuffin1]

The Application layer? lol... 4 can be bad too (if you know, you know)

[@deltech1]

Something to do with sausage pizza and not throwing it away, right 😂

[@PaulFisher]

Don’t let your guard down-layer 1 isn’t risk-free (tripping over Ethernet cable)

[@MacGuffin1]

@@PaulFisher touché!

[@toddmccarter45]

So the actual phone is more dangerious then the tower. Serious question here, I'm a trucker and talk on the phone a whole lot, also listen to podcasts and such when not. What I'm getting at is I use a bluetooth headset nearly constantly, how bad is that?

[@JimAllen-Persona]

I think it’s a valid question. I don’t know if anyone has done any studies on the long term effect of low level radiation. But I think a lot of men’s testicles would be blackened by now from all the phones carried in their front pocket if there was a danger from long term exposure.

[@jhonsiders6077]

your CB with the mirror antennas gives you more in a day than that headset would in months . Old ham guy here .

[@toddmccarter45]

@@jhonsiders6077 its usually off, also its on the towel rack in the back so 90% of it is above the roof on my truck. I'm just curious, its not gonna chamge anything for me.

[@UKsystems]

It’s probably not an issue. The only thing is if anything was to create an issue it would be things like Bluetooth headphones that’s directly against your head however it’s very safe and you get more from the Sun they are the most likely thing to be dangerous in terms of the level given off but it is still way below the safe limit

[@itnahtapohcysp]

Secret Military Advanced Residential Technology

[@pqrstzxerty1296]

Could we have a video on Tetra and cancer please.

[@RingwayManchester]

Why? There’s no link whatsoever…

[@pqrstzxerty1296]

@@RingwayManchester Some police officers have got shoulder and hip tumor cancers from the tx antenna placement. I have no proof but it said on the rounds and hop they moving from 6Ghz to near 60GHz

[@eugenedarvell8470]

If these people are so concerned about telecommunication antennas. they should wear foil hats 😂

[@MeteorMark]

Especially on Tuesdays! 😂 For SciManDan 😉

[@MM0IMC]

1:29 Also used by woo woo groups, to find 'ghosts'. 🙄

[@GluteMaximuz]

Using the terms Emit and Emissions is much preferred than Radiate and Radiation. You know it makes sense, know what I mean?

[@darrengreen7906]

14:13 2nd box from the right... LUL

[@almightyEsquilax]

Totally got me with that intro. Well done!

[@pourquoiunidentifiant]

im here mainly to read the comments 🤣😂 at least they make audience numbers higher

[@vr6swp]

She blinded me with SCIENCE #thomasdolby

[@Baggins228]

Gotta call it. At 8:52 your "lowest" and "highest" readings are the wrong way round. 1/731 is a larger number than 1/1,907,515 by several orders of magnitude.

[@petersmith5199]

My only concern is the way people in the street look at me because I'm wearing my foil helmet.....

[@ceebarr40]

So, is it safe to take off my tinfoil hat??

[@RuinInScotland]

Yes but the government are in on the conspiracies man on moon, round earth, the man down the drain and grassy knoll, Shegar and Elvis 😂

[@k7iq]

VERY good Mr. Ringway !

[@Coombsly]

You say about 5g bad when close to the antennas, what about 5g, 2.5g from a home router for WiFi?

[@RingwayManchester]

Harmless. They’re much lower powered

[@ardeladimwit]

the QE2 entered Portsmouth yesterday, so hate to think of how much deadly radiation she could spread with her Artisan radar. Why bother getting excited with 5G towers which are neither mobile or intelligent when there is a Queen about with a mobile range of 200km.

[@THEED123]

0:01 sounds like Diabetes 😝

[@UKsystems]

There is important to know that radio frequency can be dangerous but you have to deliberately make it dangerous and basically build the worlds largest microwave which is going to cost billions and billions and it would not work for phone technology

[@peterpetropoulos9607]

who remembers “Currents of Death” from the mid ‘80s ???

[@irreverend_]

I like that intro there, nice misdirect :)

[@mumfnah]

At 8:48 I think you missed a "9" in your graphic for highest reading, going by what the voiceover said. And at 7:42 you can clearly see the effects of 5G near these masts, literally birds falling from the skies 😉

[@feelincrispy7053]

You had me in the first min not gonna lie

[@jess648]

i figured but the bait and switch was great lmao

[@malcolmyoung7866]

‘Yeah.. But….’🤔😂

[@daniturn]

People focus on 5g becausr its a newer technology forgetting that there have been other things out way before the knowledge of 5g was a thing

[@BonkedByAScout]

you got the lowest and highest values swapped on that one page

[@arcticradio]

If anything at all I would be more concerned about how easy it will be to pinpoint anybody’s mobile phone in the future! The sheer amount of cells is staggering……. Here we don’t have that many cells and they are high on hills but then we don’t have the capacity need as there’s less people.

[@UKsystems]

The phones can already be tracked as part of the system that switches between masts the GPS location is sent to the cellular companies but the thing is it’s easy enough to track people using other method now but if you wanted to be targeted to be tracked that would be theleast easy way

[@abandoninplace2751]

Sounds like too much downtilt. But maybe not in the antennae.

[@mattmill30]

The plethora of anecdotes shouldn't be dismissed, just because the current science can't explain people's experiences. If children are complaining of headaches following a mast installation, which wasn't predicted using the current models, the models are at fault.