Volkswagen - Volkswagen Safety - Volkswagen Safety Research (1984)

The video illustrates the active and passive safety features built into all Volkswagen Transporter, Caravelle and LT models. The tests geographically illustrate the effects of crashes with stationery objects and other vehicles, and in roll over situations. The importance of wearing seatbelts is also clearly illustrated.
1984
1st generation LT (Typ 28/Typ 21)

[@nikola93kb]

Awesome video and channel.

[@punker4Real]

I would like to see a modern over lap test on this i'm sure it would preform quite well based on the design

[@geraldhalliday2230]

Once had a lady do a u turn in front of me while driving my orange 1984 T3 camper. I was doing about 50kmph. I braked, turned the van into her back door so the driver’s corner took the full force, closed my eyes, swore, and held on as her Merc wrapped around the front and we pushed her across the road onto the other side. My wife and I in the front, had seat belts and were fine. The two in the back didn’t and flew forward into our seats, but luckily apart from bad bruising were okay. Anything not tied down flew into the front, my wife was hit in the head by a torch, but the fittings in the van were fine. We lost both headlights and some body damage along the front. The Merc however was written off as it was twisted, but the lady got out with a cut finger from her shattered windows. A week later, the van was back on the road, all nice and shiny and we carried on our trip through Germany. The only change, the two in the back always wore there seat belts and I would go into a cold sweat when ever I had to pass a silver Merc parked on the side of a road. Lessons we learnt as shown in this video. Wear seatbelts, don’t leave stuff lying around and the VW could T-bone a Merc and still come away smiling. 😄

[@keeledover4218]

amazing story man i was t boned in a scirocco IM ALIVE hahah

[@vannigiovannigio8861]

Good story. Good to know everyone was ok.

[@iuopunderstandyourjokes9914]

And they say that mercs are indestructible...

[@daigosaito888]

Cool STORY bro 😂

[@augenbutter]

@iuopunderstandyourjokes9914 Actually they're designed to protect the passengers, which it did in this case. You'd prefer it go the other way around? Btw, nobody says that mercs are indestructible in accidents! If the rolls were switched, I'm sure the VW wouldn't be on the road and the people inside might have more than a cut finger.

[@mastermindd]

If ads were like this today, I wouldn't use any sort of adblocker...

[@b5zerker636]

Thats right

[@fujifrontier]

RIGHT??? Omg

[@bishopworks3203]

I drove a 1983 VW Vanagon Westfalia with the 1.8 Water cooled engine and a 4 speed... I can assure you, on modern roads, that vehicle was anything but safe. and I loved every minute of it

[@nikolanikola8543]

It was safe when it came out, today not so much.

[@assininecomment1630]

Compared to the previous (T2 Kombi), this generation is a revelation in safety - much less how it compares to the _original_ Type 2 (T1 generation Kombi) from the 50s! I don't think today's roads present a greater safety risk to vehicles from this era. In fact, modern roads are better. Modern vehicles sharing the road, are also less of a risk factor. Increasingly, they have collision avoidance and other safety systems which all help to make driving an old car on contemporary roads, less of a problem than ever. 🙂 Unless of course we consider the stress and cost of repairs and pets after a collision in one of these old units. 😬

[@CarRambler1]

Love how profesional and purly informative these old videos were.

[@VideoDotGoogleDotCom]

A breath of fresh air for sure! They don't underestimate the viewer by overexplaining or by adding any gimmicks to "keep the viewer interested". You watch this because you're interested in the subject, so a no-nonsense approach works the best. Nowadays many videos are like someone was telling you a story, but interrupted it time and time again to guarantee that it's an awesome yarn.

[@jears]

Just imagine, you were intended to CRUSH the steering wheel with your body. Airbags really are amazing.

[@P00katube]

Hear The Crushing Steel Feel The Steering Wheel

[@A_Really_Nice_Guy]

Grace, Jones.

[@P00katube]

@@A_Really_Nice_Guy Actually, it was The Normal, a one man band project of Daniel Miller.

[@fidelcatsro6948]

they couldve at least added some shin guard on the steering wheel

[@hdofu]

The music in this video is sick.... I mean it literally is making me nauseous, got to love there early 80s UK informational videos

[@Georg1979]

Remarkable how that van keeps it's original form, even after rolling down a steep hill. But I'm sure that the driver in it would still be dead from hitting the cabin several times with his head.

[@brucehart4627]

It's his head that stopped the roof caving in

[@bonkeydollocks1879]

@@brucehart4627 looooooool

[@brucehart4627]

@@bonkeydollocks1879 cool name donkey

[@Snufkin812]

Love the simple design of 80's Volkswagen! She has a better crumple zone than many cheap vans and small trucks sold in Asian countries in 2022. The scene of slamming Dummy's body against the steering wheel looks really painful. :(

[@fidelcatsro6948]

Suzuki Every 660 left the chat..

[@punker4Real]

china car the whole car is a crumple zone

[@herobrain8889]

Very accurate, ive experienced it myself last year in june, when i was to overtaking somone in the middle lane from the autobahn, ive crashed in a T5 Van that was standing in the left lane from the autobahn, 1/3 on the left side 50kmh i did a perfect field crash test with my T3 Doka and survived with little to no harm physicaly, but 100% damage mentaly to my beloved bulli

[@scuffediceposeidon9178]

Ze germans

[@TheHuskyGT]

The sounds and visual effects are the most 80's thing ever. Pretty cool doc though!

[@VkRmotorsport]

why there are no more documentals like this today?

[@brianmbara3663]

Cause Peaple that had made those documentaries are died on a ww van hahaha hahaha XD

[@louis2211]

@@brianmbara3663 no it's because no one that makes ads gives a shit. VW paid a lot of money for this documentary but today they don't want to pay money, they want to earn money

[@lucasono9948]

Because today there are less people that wants to know about cars.

[@TobiasLeininger]

Because today it's more important if the newest iPhone can connect to your car or its pseudo environmental friendly ... not how it drives or behaves in a crash ...

[@R4T4T4T]

@@lucasono9948 sad

[@HaroldHeidendom]

The analog Synth Sound effects make the footage so insanely dramatic, its hilarious!

[@piro9384]

lovely de-interlacing, well done and smooth!

[@scratch8141]

You'll probably wind up dead from G forces. . . But at least you won't be crushed by the car itself. Classic rock solid cars.

[@outhdare]

It is like a sci-fi documentary. The music, the tone of the speaker, the technology, everything speaks sci-fi.

[@fujifrontier]

Yes!!!!!

[@VideoDotGoogleDotCom]

At 10:00 you get real spaceship vibes. The eerie, "futuristic" music, the aluminium foil all over the place...

[@Porsche996driver]

Blade Runner. Replicant test dummies.

[@Porsche996driver]

That American Monte Carlo collapsed like aluminum foil yikes!

[@Motocicleiros]

From the 80s.

[@Frederisx]

Reading the comments and seeing all the people sharing their T3 crash stories I feel like I have to tell mine too; well not 100% mine as I was only a couple years old and in the passenger seat but my mom was driving her VW T3 bus up the road and was blinded by the sun, she drove into another more modern car of which I don't remember the model and made it roll over its side into a ditch, the other car was completely twisted and totaled but lucky the airbags inflated and all the people involved where fine, where as to the VW T3 it was LITTERALY COMPLETELY and I say it again COMPLETLY unharmed, as I recall not even the front bumper had even a scratch on it and we drive our beloved bulli to this day

[@mattdavis9601]

10:00 -- The passenger seat breaks loose from its mountings on the left side and is only held in place by the right side. I can only imagine what would've happened at a much higher speed, or if they'd hit something that's not as soft as a Buick's trunk. If the seat fully broke off would the dummy have been sliced in half by the seatbelt?

[@dandare1001]

Or if there were two passengers on the seat, which it was designed for. Why weren't they testing that, I wonder?

[@ibilki]

All these crash tests are done from the front for front shocks, something which unfortunately happens very rarely but rather on the front left or right side, and there the protection must be light! They never show that.

[@richardbrabbs8283]

The rollover test was impressive on the kamper especially with what looked like a pop top roof

[@TobiasLeininger]

Well ... they rolled it in a way so that the roof barely even touches the ground ...

[@WhiteSlift]

I wonder why the windshield got loose and flew away. Was it really attached that poorly?

[@Timico1000]

Psychomusic. :D

[@ziutagil8809]

Exactly XD

[@jeppepedersen7006]

stfu it is fuckin good

[@executive1946]

@@jeppepedersen7006 nobody said it wasn't

[@Turbo_TechnoLogic]

Is it only me or these old videos really are more professional than current ones? They just feel more...well made? No BS? Something like that

[@xPentag0n]

Not really safety now is way higher especially for small overlap which never got tested since somewhere in 2000s

[@Turbo_TechnoLogic]

@@xPentag0n Yeah well I was talking about the quality of the video itself, the journalist and cameraman work and so on

[@xPentag0n]

​@@Turbo_TechnoLogicOh yeah never mind I can't read 😅

[@Turbo_TechnoLogic]

@@xPentag0n Lol okay. Yeah the safety standards are ofc way higher now. Also the weight of the cars on the other hand

[@Billydevito]

Those crash test dummies are a lot bigger now to model the ‘average’ person today. 😎

[@AversaS2]

Damn. The Transporter was on the leading edge of safety. I wonder how it would fare on today's tests and standards.

[@sytricka3318]

AversaS it would get 1 star or maybe 0 stars

[@no1DdC]

About as well as any vehicle from the '80s. A modern supermini - even a supermini from ten, fifteen years ago - would tear right through this thing.

[@no1DdC]

It would not. Strong by the standards of the 1980s is extremely weak by today's standards. High strength, cold formed steel just didn't exist back then, not to mention the advances in the engineering department. Case in point, take a look at this video of an old Volvo crashing into a modern supermini: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m57XfX-sjdelfNU

[@no1DdC]

It's not been debunked. The video was earnest, many commenters on the other hand are a bunch of paranoid Volvo fans who can not and never will accept that old cars are worse than new ones in virtually every respect (but especially in regards to safety, reliability and economy), especially not old cars they like. The car did not have rust on structural parts, the engine was present (see the red engine block, which is clearly visible in multiple shots) and the overall misunderstanding car engineering on display is staggering. Do they, do you honestly believe that engineers have been twiddling their thumbs since then? Do you think are car with such an abysmal structural integrity would be even legal to sell today? The same kind of nonsensical conspiratorial thinking was present with the famous crash test video of an old Chevrolet against a new one, by the way.

[@funkolog]

no1DdC that car has no engine in it. case closed.. T3 wins! :-D

[@rafaelmoreira3396]

From the time when Volkswagen served and had public recognition and respect. Now...

[@maciejszumny6919]

Poor K70. My parents drove one when I was a child. What a wonderful car it was!

[@Runeakb]

NSU being taken over by VW saved VW. Before NSU, VW made old fashioned outdated cars.

[@jonasthemovie]

K70 is THE car.

[@smhorse]

Yes, I had one in right-hand-drive. For a conventional car it had a few quirks.

[@nygelmiller5293]

Unexpectedly good designs!

[@fiatconcesionariooficial4267]

Que lindo ver los autos de esa época

[@ThorneyedWT]

I wonder why those examples of crashed cars at the start of this video are mostly Audi?

[@johnrroberts7900]

1:43 - NO WAY could that driver stop normally in that short distance. In this case it's okay though: by the time the girl crosses in front of him it's gone from early afternoon to late afternoon - they must have both been going super slow!

[@fidelcatsro6948]

yes i agree, unless it was a vw 🐱👍🏿

[@Quasihamster]

"The deformation of the interior did not endanger the passengers" The instant deceleration from 50 to 0 however... forget it, just buy Volkswagen already!

[@Papasanchez440]

old tests were performed with "only" 36km/h so....fuck it, buy the damn thing

[@whattheheck1000]

A T3 is a death trap by today's standards, but when this was made in 1984, the T3 was the safest van on the market. October 8, 2018 12:50 am

[@michaelvandenberg1126]

after the accident you are able t to see the entire frame of the american vehicle

[@zoker501]

@@whattheheck1000 It's still one of the best.

[@brucehart4627]

@@Papasanchez440 if you can get the f****** s*** box up to 36 km per

[@rylinyt]

*excellent protection* also steering wheel: *ooh the inside of this test dummy chest looks like a good spot to rest!*

[@Blagotebi1]

Love the interlaced PAL 25i !

[@keithammleter3824]

Good to see VW built some safety into their Kombis in 1984, well after they were pretty much driven out of the market by Japanese vans e.g., Toyota.

[@mosesmanaka8109]

Excellent pronounciation of Volkswagen.🙂👌👊👍👏

[@عليخماش-و1ل]

Old Vw is perfect 😘😘

[@miguelangelvalderrama1808]

Most of the cars on a highway travel 100 or 120 Km/h. 50 or 75 km/h is not enough to make a crash test.

[@ryanthejackalkuhn7]

Physics set limits for crash safety. You can't run into something at 120 kmh and expect the manufacfurer to make you survive.

[@celeron55]

You obviously haven't driven a European van of that era. 100km/h is uncomfortable, 120km/h is unreachable. Still awesome though.

[@kennysboat4432]

@@celeron55 I would add 10 kilometers to your guess but yes.

[@Ismalith]

@@kennysboat4432 Depends on the version but our old T3 Diesel with 50HP had a Topspeed of 105km/h. So 100km/h is pretty much a good speed.

[@andynixon2820]

I've seen a few of these german road safety films from the 70s and 80s and I've discovered - 1 . The Germans are really weird people. 2 . They love smashing thing up . 3 . But they make excellent motor vehicles - that's why I drive a golf . A previous golf I had got written of by an errant land cruiser and the crumple zones were amazingly good .

[@P00katube]

4. They love their 80's synthesizer music groups. The last musical piece sounds like Depeche Mode.

[@frankgarrett242]

I rented a Golf GTI and drove through the Netherlands and Germany. Putting on the radio in Germany they do love their 80’s synth/techno. Even today.

[@ferdorski]

GREAT INFORMATIVE VIDEO PRESENTATION!. Thanks for posting!

[@INNO222]

@:24 I love that green Dasher!🏁

[@bencrosbie]

The amount of damage vw has done to other cars 😂 jesus like a tank

[@ziutagil8809]

deutsche gut gemacht! :D

[@ThrottleNation247]

Ben Crosbie lolzz

[@semiretired86]

well the last LT's a pillar snapped and the roof was destroyed bad one to end with but otherwisw great video

[@Tigrou7777]

Love the frightening, weird music going along with crashes...

[@DasPolarlichtlein]

these clips are awesome. no doubt. but i have to admit that i find the background music unspeakably annoying 🤣 (but that was the synthy 80s)

[@PIasmaZombie]

how about the side pole crash on the drivers door and a small overlap crash on the drivers side ?

[@patrickpowers4533]

Overlap crash tests weren’t really done back in the 1980s, most crash tests of that era used full frontal crash tests like the ones seen here. The IIHS who conducts crash tests in the US didn’t add small overlap tests to their battery of tests until 2012

[@bonkeydollocks1879]

They should have done the test a few years later on to see how all those rusty floors performed ☺️

[@antonioederlopezlopez7341]

Same with todays cars hehe

[@bonkeydollocks1879]

@@antonioederlopezlopez7341 err no hehe

[@ElectronicInspiration]

how did they get the soundtrack from a literal nightmare?

[@gonzalofelipe2328]

Aún hoy, el Volkswagen Up! , El más chico, tiene 5 estrellas en seguridad.

[@nonyadamnbusiness9887]

I'm looking at the cab deformation in the crash test at 50 kph. That's a total fail in modern NHTSA tests.

[@RayEttler]

7:03 1984 als der RO80 einfach nur ein altes Auto war [edit: das ist ja ein K70 ... hoppla!]

[@alexfoli9906]

oh no, the k 7 0 , it's a tank but ugly, i prefer the R0 80

[@frankgarrett242]

An ‘American limousine’ at 8:47. A Buick Regal.

[@snakeplissken2148]

5 years ago i had an accident at 70km/h. i crashed into a car in front of me and took about 4 cars in the rear. all of the others disappeared halfpart into dust, my 1988 vw is still running. i just had to replace the whole front and the rear bumper. yes i know that if the wohle accident would have happened with vw transporters only, we all would be dead, because the transporter is litterally constructed like a brick.

[@gabriel.954]

That van completely drove over the bumper... of course it's going to crush the trunk...

[@edgarbeat275]

Gabriel A. Seperate chassis is the reason the VW rode up. Its scary. 5th gear did a test crashing a Renault MPV v Discovery. The Renault rode up the seperate chassis. Bigger Land Rover came of worse. It's on youtube.

[@mattiasjohansson1727]

On the other hand, that's what it would do in the real world so it's completely realistic.

[@johnrroberts7900]

Still, it's bloody scary that piece of tin crumpling just the same. Looks like the car's fuel tank was empty to avoid a Pinto-like fireball!

[@wbcars]

Piękne - trochę nauki i historii. Pozdrawiamy WBcars Gdańsk -:) ps. zapinajcie Pasy. JEDNAK

[@paulebademeister1492]

3:10 so the El Caminos have been ex- crashtest-cars?

[@cidercik]

Oh stop! Stop crashing those lovely buses!

[@Walkercolt1]

My parents owned TWO T-3 Vanagons (Campmobile conversions) and like all VW vans, they were suicide in a front-end collision scenario. My current T-4 transverse I-5 engined Weekender isn't much better, the engine/transaxle will rollup under the seats with your legs and they'll call you "Stubby" after they cut you out. The floorpan of Vee-Dubs has always been a weakness in a crash, you just accept if you buy a VW van/transporter/wagon from the beginning of production. Sprinters and Ram Vans and Nissans have the below-the floor engine and a real frame and nearly triple the mass of steel in them. Funny how the US won't allow VW to import the T-5, ain't it???

[@patrickpowers4533]

Its not that the US doesn’t allow them to import the T-5, its that the T-4 had poor sales in the US market and VW didn’t want to take the financial risk of selling a car that the public didn’t want. That’s starting to change now though with VW offering their new electric van in the US.

[@zzoinks]

6:39 the crash test of the same speed looks less safe , I bet that because they removed the door and the strut inside the door is missing, it made a big difference in the rigidity of the van.

[@CycolacFan]

They learned a lot from the fragility of the Type 1 Splits and Bays…

[@greyslump2124]

i love how the windows always fall out

[@Morzsaszar]

And cause serious injury

[@Nitramrec]

@@Morzsaszar No, they didn't. Because of their desintegration in very small pieces.

[@keeledover4218]

i have been t boned in a old audi and in old sciroccos living proof vws safety was effective even without airbags

[@NarfBLAST]

Are they crashing used cars? The undercarriages look filthy and I think I even saw some rust around the door frames?

[@cemalettinucbacak8071]

wow 60fps video, i love this channel

[@allenmoore7735]

Nice! Like a tank, I feel that way in my classic bug.

[@rexjolles]

except my uncle was a firefighter and pretty much every front crash with a vw bug the passengers died and he had to use hydralic pliers to free them

[@allenmoore7735]

Rex Jolles man that’s grim, but i guess the roof and posts are weak as hell

[@fidelcatsro6948]

Im convinced to buy a 1984 model VW van now, where do i get one???

[@Pamlicojdjdj1487]

At your nearest self serve junk yard

[@PumpUptheJam81]

God I miss the eighties.

[@kavaianimu4631]

Thanks Volkswagen

[@gabriel.954]

A '78 Buick Regal is an American Limousine? WTF.... lol

[@madmax2069]

Gabriel A. That baffled me as well

[@shoknifeman2mikado135]

In Britain, they use Limousine to mean a large sedan

[@DTD110865]

But that's a coupe, and a mid-sized one at that!

[@dot7107]

DTD110865 That was a pice of shit like todays us made cars

[@DTD110865]

Salil Sawarim Be that as it may, it was still a mid-sized coupe.

[@Mabeylater293]

What about the forces on the dummy?

[@mrflamewars]

If they wanted to make it safe why didn't they give them better brakes, I had an 84 Vanagon and it had solid front rotors, non vented and the most woefully pitiful drum brakes on the back.

[@alexeggler7135]

Had one for a little while. Stopped fucking fan ass tastic.

[@Burkie-Batsbak]

I have an LT 31 with a bull bar, had an accident at 80 km. Nothing wrong with the LT. The other car was flat.

[@RoadCone411]

Something doesn’t add up here. I think VW may have altered some of their vehicles for these tests. The VW Vanagon/Bus/Transporters were not that good in crashes. These vehicles are made to look like tanks.

[@ianmoore322]

They are tanks though with the steel frame

[@harrycallahan9733]

2:10 I thought "crumple zone" means there is a "zone" that "crumples" and absorbs the collision energy so the people in the car don't have to. When a flat-nosed VW collides with other things, it doesn't have much of a zone in front to crumple, if the front end doesn't crumple much so the cabin can hold its shape, that makes the declaration extremely fast; if it crumples a lot it cause the cabin to deform and crushes the human, neither is good for survival. Yet they tell us "this feeling is not justified" :)

[@johnrroberts7900]

Simple. Write to the manufacturers telling them to ban forward-control vans.

[@AntimatePcCustom]

wonder how my old opel/vauxhall corsa from 1984 would have made it in a crash :P

[@felsner1]

Crazy how it has all evolved. This lorry would've been burned on EuroNCAP's stakes today... :-)

[@greasemonkey7221]

Ppl still drive thease in Bosnia

[@nolibtard6023]

This Synth Music is mesmerizing…

[@captmcneil]

"in most cases the speed is reduced to 50 to 80 kph by braking" ... yeah, but the other car won't be stationary. Framing this 70kph crash test that way is misleading af. It suggests country road or motorway speeds, but simulates more like a 35kph head-on collision in town.

[@phoenixman8569]

in the first crash the crumple zone did indeed absorb most of the impact, but with the lack of air bags the dummies head hit the steering wheel so hard, the driver would have still been killed, and the so called limo is really an early 80s buick skylark...

[@Pamlicojdjdj1487]

Wrong RWD Buick Regal (G-Body) produced from 1978-1987.

[@madjimms]

All of these comments on how safe the van is.... holy crap 50kph isn't very fast and the thing is crushing the passenger space..... That isn't safe at all.

[@Jeremyrockjock]

Sometimes I get into my car using an eyebolt screwed in my head.

[@rahulvinalnarayan9743]

Danger in those days meant instant death

[@SimmiJungz]

Deutsche Qualität 🍺🇩🇪🍺

[@yagibolillos96]

I can't deny that

[@jasoncarpp7742]

I would think that it would depend on the severity of the crash.

[@dariusznowak405]

I love this car !

[@bluesharp59]

Very nice and a Thumbs Up.

5:50 was a Toyota or a Mazda. they were were very alike.

[@MirkoC407]

These manufacturers were not even present with vans in Germany back then. The first ones they brought to Germany were actually with no bonnet either. It's a Bedford Blitz, a left hand steering version of the Bedford CF. You can actually see it as runaway catcher in the background when they bust that Buick.

[@scootergeorge9576]

Saying the VW van provides adequate protection in a frontal crash is laughable.

[@ticanito74]

Back in the day, this was considered adequate.

[@GodRam1988]

Go head on with a car and I guarantee the van will bend the car in half! The front of that van is extremely ridged. Did you see what that thing did to other vehicles?

[@kaptinkeiff]

Do you understand what G forces are?

[@Spyker8921]

Ram Runner Bullshit.

[@randymarsh5088]

For a forward control style chassis this is very good impact protection . Do some research come back and we can have an informed conversation about it . Until then...

[@geoffreylee5199]

Hey, where are those vans available? These still made?

[@HustleMuscleGhias]

"Average size and weight." I'm assuming they are talking about average size and weight by 1984 standards.

[@Fransenn]

No shit

[@angelsepulveda8393]

Duh...

[@Arsenic71]

6:40 Anyone who sees that and doesn't wear a seat belt... well let's just say the Darwin awards are there for a reason.

[@misterbuklau4053]

Built like a tank

[@zaf2774]

high fps old camera recording i see

[@rexjolles]

its slow motion, dumbass

[@martingerhard4562]

Das WAR einmal!

[@datasilouk1995]

Unless I missed it, who did the voiceover?

[@fydstar]

Fronterly?

[@johnnyq1233]

I got to say... that is pretty impressive! I doubt a caravan, venture or odyssey would do as well or any other van! I'll take 2 please one with the camper options and the other a cargo version! Thankyou!

[@rabbiebascomb1072]

johnnyq1233 I’d rather take my chances in an odyssey than a tin can. These are 1984 tests in the video, and I’d rather go for the car with an abs and airbags

[@NSoupFog]

video is good but the commentary is at times dangerously suggestive in favor of the safety, but I guess it is a small chance someone try this with intention.

[@田崎正彦-b6q]

ドイツ車の丈夫さが良く分かる

[@blubayou2551]

No Trabants were used in the test crashes,someone said,they were being rented to Russian Tourists,lol,that transporter was running slow,like 20mph,,,,,,,Put on the transporter with a rear end of 18 wheeler

[@Royale-ir6bn]

60 Frame?