"The steering wheel rim impacted the chest very unfavourably" otherwise known as "Aaaargh!"
@williscurry65576 жыл бұрын
The germans put "death" soo elegantly. Those were only 28mph tests. The IIHS would have a field day.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
According to IIHS the t3 is impressively better than the initial estimations after the NHTSA's approval tests for import. To be be more accurate, I can say that IIHS recognizes the t3 as the safest, with the lower death rate, car of it's era! And all these for the 2wd edition. The 4wd, (Syncro), edition is even much more better because of structural reinforcements and much better active safety. Some links to check the previously mentioned: Passive safety: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html Active safety: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_2.html 4wd cars are safer: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/article-excerpt.html This is the Syncro Heresy: vwsyncro.eu
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
this is what most of the cars before mid-1990s did. Drivers were shis kebaped.
@carlospuchiperez98155 жыл бұрын
@@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy you are spamming us PD now a 2007 daihatsu mira, a 2004 hyundai atos & even a 2000 renault twingo are obviously safer
@carlospuchiperez98155 жыл бұрын
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
@RememberTheSlapFilms4 жыл бұрын
I used to own a Hiace. Loved that van. So much fun to drive, very reliable, but scary.
@J7Haip2 жыл бұрын
i have a school trip tmrw and the van they use is a hiace and yep they are scary and love to almost roll.
@newrider42015 жыл бұрын
AND IT WAS ONLY AT 36 KM/HR!!! I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT COULD HAPPENED AT 60 OR 100 KM/HR 😱
@lastp69054 жыл бұрын
I don’t think many L200 vans have ever reached 60kmh, never mind 100
@kaidenbrennfoerder43043 жыл бұрын
8:29
@kuntakinte4333 Жыл бұрын
NO Mitsubishi was ever serious damaged by a crash with over 200 kph...😊
@mattiasjohansson172711 ай бұрын
TBH, 100 km/h into a wall is unsurviveable even in the safest vehicles of today.
@cccetomacrogol6 жыл бұрын
Luckely no parcels were harmed during the tests.
@rolandocrisostomo20035 жыл бұрын
None of the dummies where holding onto the steering wheel..., It's no wonder they crash.
@mals44005 жыл бұрын
So...remember to hold the wheel to avoid crashes
@loktom40685 жыл бұрын
The real dummies would be texting with both hands.
@mattiasjohansson17275 жыл бұрын
No, texting with one and smoking with the other........
@regular_being3 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Loading screens be like: *Steering can help avoiding car crashes*
@ChoppedAndRevamped2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@sdry5 жыл бұрын
I used to be adventurer like you untill master break cylinder hit on my knee.
@marten787 жыл бұрын
I like their four-striped knock-off Adidas suits
@pugsareawsome52026 жыл бұрын
marten you know they were kinda going to get destroyed anyway
@mxferro5 жыл бұрын
Thats the kind of idiot that gets in those accidents...ones that wear Adidas outfits
5 жыл бұрын
Gopniks having a tough day.
@ilham73453 жыл бұрын
@@mxferro no no, authentic three stripes will protect you from anything including Chernobyl nuclear radiation. but not the knockoff 4 stripes
@hirzanabqary2 жыл бұрын
allianz brand
@burtvhulberthyhbn75836 жыл бұрын
VW's van here shows basically no deformation . I was an investigating officer at a crash of this van into the side of a city bus where the driver died. The van showed very little deformation and stood up very well except..... the door came open and the stupid driver wasn't using the seatbelt. He fell outside and the bus ran over his head. These Germans don't lie. I've done many collision investigations and german cars come out on top. Mercedes-Benz cars crash like Tiger tanks.
@lunsmann6 жыл бұрын
They crush the opposition?
@burtvhulberthyhbn75836 жыл бұрын
lunsmann the only van I investigated in a crash struck the side of a moving city bus at 90 degrees. As a general rule Japanese vehicles do not crash as well as German vehicles.
@jamesbehrje42796 жыл бұрын
Burt Hulbert its because they put more into there design then the Japanese models did, even some of the American models of the era. Volkswagen and Volvos were seen as the standard of what automakers strived to be in terms of safety. However with that safety there was a cost factor, and many car manufactures just chose to make a cheaper inferior product instead. Also the price of safety in the end is paid for by the consumer. If the consumer isnt as worried about their personal safety then they aren't going to be paying for it. They'll buy the cheaper vehicle, every time! ! ! Safety in the industry is largely determined on supply and demand. Still is. Gocernment regulatory agency's can try to promote safety but it will always fall back on the consumer in the end.
@mamuwaldevoudoupractitione35186 жыл бұрын
James Behrje retards buying vehicle solely on the basis of looks are just retards. They get what they pay for...death! 💀 #GermanAutoLover4Life
@mamuwaldevoudoupractitione35186 жыл бұрын
Burt Hulbert #GermanAutoLover4Life German cars are all I own and will ever purchase.
@herrgolf7 жыл бұрын
These VWs really proved their worth in Lebanon during the '80s conflicts, as well as Palestinian territories. Always interesting to watch them at work as ambulances, heaving over debris in the street, independent rear axle articulating every which way. Would be fun to have one of these with an EJ22 swap.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy7 жыл бұрын
For the passive safety of the vw t3, you can have a look at here: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html
@boriskarloff99925 жыл бұрын
herrgolf i own one with an EJ25. Fabulous vehicle. Their bodywork is very good.
@zzoinks6 ай бұрын
Tough
@DolleHengst6 жыл бұрын
@ 4:20 i love how the Vanette automatically opens the rear sliding door, because the front door is jammed as fuck
@Alex4620477 жыл бұрын
Back in the bad old days when Japanese cars crumpled up like Coke cans.
@douglas12398n7 жыл бұрын
Cars are supposed to crumple... that’s their goal. Just not to the extent where the cabin is intruded.
@Alex4620477 жыл бұрын
Douglas Nunn - Nooooo! Really?
@42luke936 жыл бұрын
Alex462047 Im glad I am not the only person who does that.
@ottopalosaari86856 жыл бұрын
Alex462047 yes they are. if they didnt, the impact would be higher
@randymarsh50885 жыл бұрын
Alex462047 they still do this
@iananderson4897 Жыл бұрын
What's even more disturbing is of the Japanese vans, the Mitsubishi was one of the oldest models tested and was even then thought to be not as safe as it's Japanese rivals. It's also interesting to see how many vans did not have laminated windscreens, apart from the VW I don't think any of the others did.
@whattheheck1000 Жыл бұрын
The VW definitely did the best here, but it had one major flaw: it had a windshield designed to fly out. No cars on the market in 1984 still had this feature; yes it happened from time to time in crash tests where the occupant compartment was severely compromised, but not where it had no or minor damage. In the USA, Federal standard required windshields to stay in place on passenger cars starting on January 1, 1970. Vans got an exemption to about 1991 I think. In Europe, pop-out windshields generally disappeared before 1980. Other than that, it would have performed about like an average 1980s car in a frontal crash, while the rest of the vans would have done far worse. VW definitely did a great job on the structural design for a van with very little front crush space. However, the next generation Japanese vans that started coming out around 1986 beat even the VW T3 on safety. The T3 failed a NHTSA full-front crash test (other full-size van designs from its era did much worse, though). The Mitsubishi Van and Nissan Vanette passed this test in 1988-1989. June 18, 2023 12:52 am
@phonecollectoryt32837 жыл бұрын
Vw t3 vs all 1980s japan cargo van, very interesting!
@wheelinglakeerierailfan73556 жыл бұрын
1:03 smiley face!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@P00katube5 жыл бұрын
Hear The Crushing Steel Feel The Steering Wheel Hear The Crushing Steel Feel The Steering Wheel
@justinvasko35776 жыл бұрын
Green Nissan, the door opened cause you arrived at your destination
@antonioederlopezlopez73415 жыл бұрын
Destination: death
@mattdavis96014 жыл бұрын
Your final destination.
@antiangelofmusic6 жыл бұрын
A Volkswagen that can be fixed for a reasonable cost? Where?
@FLJAMESFL5 жыл бұрын
Anti Angelofmusic So true.
@frankgarrett2424 жыл бұрын
In 1984.
@DieGamerAG4 жыл бұрын
Everything before 2003
@AndresGarcia-yo5qt7 жыл бұрын
To this day people still getting killed by those minivans everyday in my country.besides they drive them suicide mode.
@pugsareawsome52026 жыл бұрын
Andres Garcia REEEEEEEE *drives off bridge*
@mindujiman7 жыл бұрын
No wonder why everyone stopped making this kind of vans
@Juha_Virtanen5 жыл бұрын
The middle engine Hiace is still in production :/
@mattdavis96014 жыл бұрын
Some of the vans crash-tested in this video are still available brand new in Southeast Asia and Africa.
@HandIeThese3 жыл бұрын
the L300 is still new here in Indonesia. yes that one in the Video with a different headlight and fake grille
@mals44005 жыл бұрын
I wonder if VW were gaming the tests back then as well?
@TheTatraplan5 жыл бұрын
Very thanks for upload
@SuperKafooo5 жыл бұрын
I wonder how much did that heartbeat soundtrack help lure customers into buying the VW. Also my dad was in a l300 crash, narrowly escaped losing his dick, of course I wouldn't be here otherwise.
@chrisfreemesser57076 жыл бұрын
Tests only done at 22mph? Seems like VW cherry-picked the speed to maximize the Vanagon's "better" performance. I wonder what a crash test of the VW at the more realistic 40mph commonly used for crash tests would look like.
@MaartenvanHeek6 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same. Also note how the speeds are not exactly identical. They also made the mistake equating a 35 kph frontal offset to a stationary block with a 50-55 kph full frontal crash. Still scary how poorly the Japanese performed at this low speed.
@davidhollenshead48925 жыл бұрын
The Vanagon didn't need to have a cherry-picked test, as they are that safe. I own a 91 Vanagon and a 1978 Ford Econoline, and the Vanagon is safer, but the Ford is a better work van. Note that American Econolines from 1975 to 1991 crash about the same, as they have the same frame and body...
@sportshatch5 жыл бұрын
Chris Freemesser VW would never cheat to make their car look good? O .....Yes.....actually that's exactly what VW do. 22mph test is totally meaningless and VW knew that but also knew it would not pass at any greater speed. Once a cheat always a cheat. The other vans however are just criminal .
@whattheheck10004 жыл бұрын
This was 1984, no vehicles could pass a 40 mph offset crash test then. I believe Mercedes was designing for offset crashes at 50 kph (31 mph) then, they were ahead of the curve. Volkswagen was able to make a flat nose van perform as well as a typical car of the era (with a front end). In a 40 mph offset, the dummy in any of the vans, including the Vanagon, would be fatally injured, as would the vast majority of the dummies in cars of the era. The standard crash test carmakers tried to pass in 1984 was a 35 mph full frontal, offset crash tests weren’t done yet. November 6, 2019 5:18 am
@mattdavis96014 жыл бұрын
I'm inclined to give VW a pass on the speed thing. The beginning of the video stated, paraphrasing, that the speed and set-up used here was applicable to about 90% of the wrecks these types of vans were involved in. That seems reasonable to me considering that the life of one of these vans would likely consist of deliveries, hauling tradies' tools, shuttles, etc in an urban environment. Anecdotally, I don't drive that much faster downtown either.
@nigelgoodwin6954Ай бұрын
That track suit is sooo Sir James Savile OBE. He did own a T3 camper so perhaps this was him, without the wig, doing a try- before-you-buy. Shame the injuries weren’t worse.
@Mr.Looooong5 жыл бұрын
Why does every crash sound the same?
@AhmedAlBoraie6 жыл бұрын
Very interesting... I wonder how results are 30 years later.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
Perfectly as you can see here: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html
@AhmedAlBoraie6 жыл бұрын
I mean if these tests were done nowadays with current 2018 vans, will the results be the same???
@whattheheck10006 жыл бұрын
No they would be a lot better. In a lot of 2018 vans you could walk away from this type of crash at 64 kph. March 5, 2018 2:08 am
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
In theory, yes. Now you can see a real life crash test of a 2wd Vanagon, (inferior to a Syncro), at 40 miles per hour: www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=419961&start=0 And here you can find the photo: 3.bp.blogspot.com/-lPXIi8b46Ig/WExVBsZB8tI/AAAAAAAAAsE/wD-r_ZLvdF08f597-hRux2FLWwh2DgoEgCLcB/s1600/P1030508.jpg
@davidhollenshead48925 жыл бұрын
@@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy, wrong the 2WD is safer. as they are much harder to roll over. Besides the Syncro has twice the repair costs...
@zzoinks7 жыл бұрын
How awful. Crashes a little above 25 MPH could not possibly be so bad, but these vans prove that anything is possible.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
Vanagon, at this 40% overlap difficult test, has a perfect behavior. For more aggressive cases, please have a look: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html
@whattheheck10006 жыл бұрын
A little below 25 mph - to be specific, 23-24 mph. Proves how far car safety has come that if I were in this type of crash in my 2011 Honda Accord sedan I probably would literally be unhurt. March 5, 2018 2:09 am
@zzoinks6 ай бұрын
@@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresythanks! Also this is a throwback to when KZbin used to allow links in comments. Not anymore though
@RaulDragomirYT5 ай бұрын
1:13 Mitsubishi L300 2:52 Isuzu Cargo Van 4:20 Nissan Vanette 5:47 Nissan Urvan 7:13 Toyota Hiace 8:33 Toyota Liteace 9:55 Volkswagen Transporter
@VDPEFi Жыл бұрын
These are accidents averaging about 23mph.... terrifying
@bgoth14356 жыл бұрын
Those VWs were tough little vans in their day, if you were going to drive a van they were one of the best ones but time has moved on and I suspect the same test on a modern van would make the T3 look somewhat weak.
@SeveryBoy8 ай бұрын
Has the "collision" sound already been "identified" during installation?
@Van-Hammer7 жыл бұрын
Let's face it; this is simply poor vehicle design. There is no crumple zone or added protection for the unfortunate persons occupying the front seats. That's a fail.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
With the exception of the vw t3.(t25)
@jockwood23986 жыл бұрын
Most passenger cars from this era were just as bad
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
The t3, (according to the IIHS), was the safest car of the era. Please have a look: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html And one of the safest cars today.
@kz1000ps6 жыл бұрын
Yup, there's only so much you can do with a fatal design flaw like this
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
Having no reason to support the Vanagon, Caravelle, Transporter, but that I was a proud owner/driver about 13 years for the 2wd and 10, consecutive, years for the Syncro, I can tell you one think: the car is a tank. It is much better than the 90% of the nowadays cars in terms of active and passive safety. For the active: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_2.html For the passive: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html The Syncro Heresy: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_35.html
@ginocole7 жыл бұрын
The L300 is still alive here in the Philippines
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
What about their drivers?
@ginocole6 жыл бұрын
Some... I saw one that crashed.
@ginocole6 жыл бұрын
And it still has the same design... Except the van version.
@FrancisLitanofficialJAPINOY6 жыл бұрын
Gino Sangalang Also Indonesia as Isuzu Bison and Mitsubishi Colt L300 (truck and minibus).
@supermasterPIK5 жыл бұрын
@@ginocole no bigger changes. Bigger bumper ... shift lever moved from wheel to floor... Headlights now plastic.
@limawhisky5 жыл бұрын
No doubts the transporter is the best of all. Love VW. Vans.
@zzoinksАй бұрын
It seems like the windshield adhesive used at this time isn't strong enough to keep the windshield attached
@laurencecope66777 жыл бұрын
Now try the same test with a Transit.
@pugsareawsome52026 жыл бұрын
Laurence Cope which one?
@FrancisLitanofficialJAPINOY6 жыл бұрын
pugs are awsome Ford Transit.
@mattdavis96014 жыл бұрын
A Transit from this era at least had a nose. It's probably markedly less unsafe, as opposed to safe, than any of the vans tested. I would think. I would hope...
@greengold7236 жыл бұрын
This video is from the 1984. As for VW. They have to deal with all issues of the first Beatles so they try to make a safe products.
@AversaS26 жыл бұрын
I would love to see the transporter against today's safety standards and tests.
@lee22174 жыл бұрын
Strangely No Mercedes TN in the tests? That would be the transporters main competitor
@DetriotSteel7 жыл бұрын
The blow to the body is high because there is no crumple zone... In fact, the VW gives the driver the fastest deceleration what could result in more internal damage to vital parts...
@colin51967 жыл бұрын
Nonsense. Take your pick, broken femurs and a major hit to the via steering wheel, or rapid deceleration. None of these 36 kph crashes were anywhere near causing deceleration-based injuries.
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
NCAP: "the VW VANAGON has the best chest deceleration score", it is tough and soft.
@davidhollenshead48925 жыл бұрын
The Vanagon has a crumple zone, just not as big of one as a front-engined van or car...
@ARuralVermonterQqjmcb1826 жыл бұрын
they used the same audio clip for every crash
@kevinrafisugiharto53805 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. Haha.. Heartbeat sounds
@laplacesdemon93715 жыл бұрын
This is 36km/h ... how will be the 64 km/h ? Sorry, my English is the worst )))
@ronaldderooij17747 жыл бұрын
I would like to see what they said about the deceleration force on the internal organs.
@akronymus7 жыл бұрын
We are talking about 36 km/h or 22 mph - bicycle speed in fact
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
NCAP: "the Vanagon has the best chest deceleration rate". Notorius Vanagon vs Volvo 745 crash test: HIC (Head Injury Criterion) for driver, Volvo: 3,868, VW: 155 Head Impact, Volvo: 200 G, VW: 42 G Chest impact, Volvo: 65 G, VW: 30 G The Volvo "driver" is killed. The Vanagon driver with brushes. All these here: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html
@williscurry65576 жыл бұрын
Im sure it was "less than favorable" with the wheel crushed in the dummys chect.
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
@ Willis Curry it wouldn't have been such a great invest to construct a softer steering-wheel. The old VW beetle (the series with the flat front screen) was severely worse in this regard - the steering axle was one solid piece without links and invaded passenger room even at a minor crash.
@davidhollenshead48925 жыл бұрын
@@akronymus If by old VW beetle you are referring to a 1938 thru 1950s model...
@savvasmakrygianakis7513 Жыл бұрын
Αυτό ήταν απλά εκείνη την εποχή για να κατηγορηθούν ως επικυνδινα τα ιαπωνικά αυτοκίνητα θυμάμαι με το nissan vanette που είχε ο πατέρας μου μας τράκαραν μετωπική και δεν πάθαμε μικροτραυματισμούς
@CarWash811 Жыл бұрын
These old Vw vans are very unsafe compared to the much newer one. Search from youtube: Camper im Crashtest: VW Transporter T3 gegen VW T6
@Riverolf7 жыл бұрын
Did they miss all the other Vans at that time? Mercedes? Ford Transit? Bedford? US Vans? and so on...
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
@ Terje Larssen this is a test of VW T3 against top-selling Japanese competitor forward-control vans, as VW claimed superior safety
@lee22174 жыл бұрын
akronymus why no Mercedes TN van?
@田崎正彦-b6q5 жыл бұрын
デリカとファーゴはそこそこ丈夫だな。
@williamla5252 Жыл бұрын
Dans le cas de l'étude de l'accidentologie des véhicules à cabine avancé tel le Volkswagen Transporter 3 ça nous donne une vue des recherches de la part des ingénieurs de l'époque. C'est tellement intéressant 😄😃😃😃🤙🤙
@felixcat93183 жыл бұрын
It was horrific that such catastrophically weak commercial vehicles were allowed to be sold! The tests speak for themselves, and as a driver I would've wanted to have been in the VW. The Japanese micro trucks would come out even worse than any vehicle in this test.
@TheTatraplan4 жыл бұрын
Yes, yes, i have a VWINNER! :-)
@mcrazza5 жыл бұрын
No crash test dummies were harmed in making this video.
@markbrookes65575 ай бұрын
What do you expect from a vehicle with ZERO front end protection.
@nicholasagnew27922 жыл бұрын
After an offset frontal crash test the VW wasn't even totaled
@FrancisLitanofficialJAPINOY Жыл бұрын
Aka VW Eurovan in the US. It meets US standards.
@supermasterPIK5 жыл бұрын
In VW the rear view mirror falls down under impact??
@howardjonesjr73882 ай бұрын
No safety glass?
@j4dnn_1346 жыл бұрын
I didn't know old vans were safe!
@hendrikvanspankeren2514 ай бұрын
All of these tests happened in a second, or two, or two, or two, boom boom, boom boom, boom boom.😅
@UseitLoseit5 жыл бұрын
VW Crash Tests, excellent. Diesel Emissions, not so excellent..
@jamesbehrje42796 жыл бұрын
TOYOTA made sh#t vans back in the day. The Toyota vans tested faired worse then all of them including is rival Japanese models.
@nikolanikola85434 жыл бұрын
And now Toyota is the best
@saxongreen783 жыл бұрын
The LiteAce in the test was shameful...a tin box on wheels.
@chiboreache7 жыл бұрын
didn't even realised that van so strong
@stevenrivers25417 жыл бұрын
German Viktorovich only the VW
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
Much stronger than you can imagine. Please have a look: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html
@wopmf4345FxFDxdGaa206 жыл бұрын
+HELLENIC VANAGON That is totally normal strength for a van on that site. Japanese newly designed vans too from the 90's are very strong, like the mitsubishi delica L400. ;) But the T3 was clearly ahead in safety in 80's. But in mechanical strength it was then behind the Japanese, and I am afraid still is. If they could get Germans to design the safety and japanese the reliability & serviceability, italians the usability and you would get an ultimate van. :)
@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy6 жыл бұрын
You are right.
@CardboardSliver5 жыл бұрын
4:17 Ironhide's death wasn't this gruesome in the 1986 movie!
@enzoperruccio4 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah they totally didn't reinforce that one specific transporter.
@arjanvanraaij84406 жыл бұрын
Result is that today are no more vans with your feet in front of wheels and engine. I haven been in a 50km head on crash in a mercedes sprinter and walked away without a scratch. engine infront, legs and feet above the wheels engine seatbelt.
@lincolnpaul18147 жыл бұрын
How about showing crash tests today, then talk about German cars
@howtowithelizabeth75136 жыл бұрын
Those older cars look stronger then modern cars
@howtowithelizabeth75136 жыл бұрын
Ok I take it back just because they barely were smashed it caused a lot of harm to the dummy
@jasoncarpp77425 жыл бұрын
As much as I like forward control vans, I drove a Mitsubishi Delica van back in the 90s, neither the VW Transporter, nor the Mitsubishi look like it would provide much protection in a collision above 10 mph.
@potardo98513 жыл бұрын
8:32 sounded like a cartoon.
@timtim8468 Жыл бұрын
A Bukhanka would be interesting, in comparison.
@sportshatch5 жыл бұрын
So if you crash at 22mph you will be OK in the VW. OK I will only drive it in 30 mph limits. This is a case of a manufacturer designing a test that they know their van will pass. Good luck in a 50 mph collision. Of course VW have a track record of honest testing?
@waltinhounderground64687 жыл бұрын
Mesmo sendo um perigo esses carros vendem muito .
@nio_mind6 жыл бұрын
保険会社がクラッシュテストを行なっていたとは、知らなかった。
@adelaideautowashes5 жыл бұрын
how it feels to chew 5 gum
@baconcatsizzle6 жыл бұрын
At 0:19, could anyone tell me which model VW that is?
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
@ Bacon Cat this is a 1303 Cabrio (convertible) made by Karmann between 1972 and 1974 (at later models, 1975-1979, front indicators moved to the front), with European lights and bumpers (different from US version)
@baconcatsizzle6 жыл бұрын
akronymus Would you happen to know why it has a Mitsubishi badge?
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
@ Bacon Cat at 0:19 there is a Mitsubishi L300 in the picture and a green 1303 on the lane next to it ... the L300 by the way had engine and gear-box underneath the front seat row, and also existed in 4x4 version (very popular as a camper)
@jorgeb97153 жыл бұрын
It's expected for a cab over engine van,,at 60 mph you're dead,,now,why windows glass shatters in all vehicles,,put a Film to keep it from blowing out
@AverageAviationist122 жыл бұрын
8:32 wow
@AverageAviationist122 жыл бұрын
8:52
@nivaldoss2au7 жыл бұрын
Allianz is a french company.
@akronymus6 жыл бұрын
@ Nivaldo Santos Allianz is an originally German insurance company with branches in many countries
@PhaQ25 жыл бұрын
The Nissan Urflat was IMO the worst.
@kiinanomistaja24026 жыл бұрын
There are no crumble zones in the T3 so your brain will brobably exit tru your nostrils.
@triswonder12395 жыл бұрын
Still prefer japanese for reability
@guyjonson63645 жыл бұрын
Vans this shape have little room for crush zones
@RenaxTM915 жыл бұрын
Yea, but the Japanese found the solution: put the crumple zone between the driver seat and steering wheel... I prefer My T3 hard, strong and with my feet over other peoples hoods, some Swedes tested the T3 head on against a Volvo to prove that the Volvo was really safe. The Van hit and got up on the Volvo's hood and the bumper smashed trough the front windshield. So its relatively safe to crash into sedans and such small cars, just not other T3's or hard walls or something..
@AverageAviationist122 жыл бұрын
8:38 ow
@neilsg2001 Жыл бұрын
Hi VW, I'll take the affordable reliable option thanks
@edgarmartinez71557 жыл бұрын
put on an icy hot and you'll be fine
@sio34395 жыл бұрын
there basically death traps
@MrBastll5 жыл бұрын
„Nur für den internen Gebrauch“ ok xD
@ТарасБерезняк-д6ы7 жыл бұрын
А в реале про столкновении со Смартом с его 5 звёздами этот фургон ничего зе заметит. Масса решает.
@erkocyber5 жыл бұрын
Где смарт ты увидел
@Whatsthepoint66675 жыл бұрын
If only vw cars were like this today.......😂...nowadays with all the tech......You Die!..and its gruesome.
@greysonfr5 жыл бұрын
There crash site is so small
@kramrle5 жыл бұрын
Did VW already manipulate these tests 🤔
@halnwheels4 жыл бұрын
They wouldn't do that... would they?
@thisproduction76915 жыл бұрын
That ambulance in Indonesia
@AverageAviationist122 жыл бұрын
2:51
@DinukaD6 жыл бұрын
Yes, VW is stronger, but purpose of this video is nothing but defeating top selling Japanese vans at time ..! Especially Toyota hiace..
@nikolanikola85435 жыл бұрын
Toyotas were and still are, much better than VW
@davidhollenshead48925 жыл бұрын
Nope, the purpose was keeping the insurance costs down for VW Owners...
@FrancisLitanofficialJAPINOY5 жыл бұрын
Nikola Martinis European Toyota Hiace (CH10) are better than Cabover vans. Because it has hood at top of European Hiace van (CH10) sold in Europe, and Taiwan.
@linebacker795 жыл бұрын
Francis Litan The Higharse was a death trap. Especially if you were a passenger sitting on that hard fold down extra seat.
@forof4164 жыл бұрын
1:20 Mitsubishi
@blubayou25515 жыл бұрын
The dummy after performing the stunts asked for advil's and quit on the spot,,,VW left their transporter dead last,,so it can be reinforced,,,,,,Vans with no front would kill anyone with or without crumple zone,,that heartbeat sound was sounding like Grimmy was waiting patiently,what dummy angel of death,,it was a dummy driving,lol
@buubised7 жыл бұрын
i would still take the isuzu or liteace
@deutzd7 жыл бұрын
t3
5 жыл бұрын
VW little damage, cheap to repair? That's good. The drivers family can use the savings to bury him or her because they died from the excessive G-Forces generated by a lack of a energy absorption from having no crumple zone.
@AlexM281079 ай бұрын
Родственники буханки.
@alasdair41615 жыл бұрын
Vans with humans as structural components.. cadaver crumple zones.