冇反應冇意義的強者vs有意義的弱者,op op 設題弱者才需要信仰!以下討論是效果分柝,勾到什麼呢?勾起自認強者的不屑一顧!設題為強者不需要信仰嗎,又帶不能帶出S級無神論者哲學的大學生!S級太op了就處理掉這世界。若要神思典唔好太op,留得福音在那怕無永生,真碰巧定非偶然?有圖有真相。S級的英雄們是不用祈禱都有飯食!祈禱都系唔想太op!勾到什麼?勾到我注意S級的生命值!
因果 literally translates to “causality.” Causality illustrated by modern physics suggest the absence of “free will.” Furthermore, Causality is actually aligned with “Total Depravity” and ”Irresistible Grace” which both are derived from Calvinism (加爾文主義).
@st19523 жыл бұрын
@@迺哥BrotherNai that is incorrect... a present result is caused by past actions under the right conditions( that is if time stops). The following result will be the resultant of past and the present actions.... the past cannot be changed, present actions are free- willed.
@st19523 жыл бұрын
@@迺哥BrotherNai 因果is translated from the Pali word Kamma, translated to causality.. unfortunately word for word translation between languages sometimes do not convey the meaning completely... besides causality, kamma can also be translated to volition(意) or actions.
@迺哥BrotherNai3 жыл бұрын
I agree that the past cannot be changed. I agree that present actions are free-willed. I agree 因果 is very logical. I agree Buddhism is very logical. However, if we break down these concepts, things become complicated. How do you define "the past?" Different observers will disagree on that. How do you define "free will?" If human thoughts are just chemical and physical reactions, and there is no way to alter the laws that govern them, how do you argue that human actions are not just the outcome of these reactions, which we have no control over? Is human logic flawless? Human intuition is definitely flawed. Concepts that seem logical may not be true. On the contrary, scientific theories based on hardcore evidence are often counterintuitive. So I guess it makes sense when Christians claim Christianity to be true, even though it may seem counterintuitive and illogical sometimes.
@st19523 жыл бұрын
@@迺哥BrotherNai The past should be defined in layman terms for the discussion. Although we say that there is free will but it is not in the absolute sense, We are still bonded by conditions. But we have the capability to make a substantial change. Kamma is 1 of the 5 laws(niyama). there are other niyama which is beyond our control. www.learnreligions.com/the-five-niyamas-449741 Agree that logic only make sense in terms of human logic.... In 1 particular sutta,(Kalama) the Buddha tells people not to simply believe because something sounds logical and encourages people to enquire. The idea of Buddhist liberation (or heaven if preferred) itself is not logical. Logic only covers up to the point where we can explain. Back to logic, the idea of Kamma does explain to the differences and inequalities of mankind, the root problem of suffering due to ignorance(not seeing clearly, completely). Why pple are born the way they are.... rich, poor, child prodigies, disabled, individual preferences and dislikes etc.