"Influencer Lawyer" Jeanette "Janet" Braun Smacked Down In Court Replies

Patreon: www.patreon.com/runkleofthebailey
Locals: runkleofthebailey.locals.com/
BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay
All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.

[@simnaibos6454]

"My million of followers say I am not in the public eye" 🤣🤣

[@willer3399]

I’m sure the irony of that statement wasn’t noticed.

[@sabregunner1]

yeah it does seem that this person got criticized for something they did and said, and did do publically and is mad about it and is now suing the person who provided the criticism. courty is saying, oh honey, no you cant do that. TLDR is mad about fair use laws and sues them

[@katielau]

My undergrad had a population of around 32,000 students across all grades. Imagine saying you have every single person at decently sized university watching your content and saying you're not in the public eye. And then, imagine 30 other similar-sized university campuses and every single student there also watching. Bffr.

[@jeffprice6421]

@@willer3399 literally her own filings from the start, show that her claim is invalid... How, pray tell, did either Janet or Benji pass the bar with logical skills this poor? Or is the bar exam really more about memorizing caselaw????

[@ashleymartin9590]

Not just mockery. Vicious mockery, Janet, Lauren, and Benji take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on their next argument

[@llareia]

Unfortunately disadvantage only applies once, and they already seem to have disadvantage on their arguments, though I can't decide whether it's due to the facts against them or the ineptitude of their counsel.

[@xoxoEllieECo]

* Astarion Approves *

[@notmethnx]

Booooo

[@katiekawaii]

1:10:20 But I think the biggest reason she questioned whether Janet was actually Lauren's lawyer was because the cease and desist letter was so poorly and unprofessionally written that it didn't seem like it came from an actual lawyer at all. When it first broke, I literally commented "there is no way a real lawyer wrote that." I was _stunned_ when I learned I was wrong.

[@justkiddin84]

Yes!

[@grayaj23]

It reminded me of the famous response letter the Cleveland Browns legal team once sent to an idiot lawyer. "I feel you should be made aware that some asshole is signing your name to stupid letters."

[@Crazypenmonkeyme]

No 😅 21:32 in😅😅

[@mikedsps]

​@@grayaj23that's hilarious!

[@Aalisrocklist]

yesss a Janet update in the middle of the KR pandemonium is just what we need. Some comedic relief with Jan Jan!!!

[@crybabyitis]

Jan Jan 😂😂😂😂

[@noodlesmom01]

Yes! 😂 much needed

[@nhokonhokopuala]

Just reading that dude name gives me nausea

[@FlareStorms]

kr?

[@tomd9132]

@@FlareStormsKaren Reid. Or it might be Reed. She’s the one in Mass who is charged with k*lling her BF.

[@Voodoofairy88]

I think Benji was trying to help someone he thought was friend & now seriously wishes he hadn't. I have a sneaking suspicion he was mislead by his "friend"

[@catela5552]

Having in mind Benji quickly took down/adjusted claims of his "awesomeness" and his alleged clients from his own website after Runkle pointed out they were inappropriate and legaly sensitive to be on a lawyer's resume. I think Benji and Janette are more likely a case of "takes one to find one"...

[@larrywest42]

"When brains are too expensive, get Braun - Braun IP Law, LLC." Janet: feel free to use this as a Service Mark. No charge.

[@mdrdprtcl]

😂😂😂

[@YinYangAngel55]

1:20:31 "yeah, he's apparently mentioned me in court." Runkle is out here with multiple houses, seeing as he is living rent free in Benji's head.

[@talkstosocks2]

NEVER apologise for an extro long Janet episode.

[@ros8986]

Or, IMNHO, any Runkle video.

[@ladyflappington]

I love the level of detail he usually gives, long videos yes please!

[@kittyninja9571]

Yep don't mind at all how long Janet Jeanette videos are they're hilarious and we probably learn more than Janet and Benji combined along the way.

[@LordHonkInc]

"When the enemy is making a false movement we must take good care not to interrupt him.” - Napoleon Bonaparte during the Battle of Austerlitz, 1805

[@jm_mort]

"Long on pages and short on substance" @ 4:21 I love that!

[@sanctuary_polaris]

I laughed way too hard at that honestly, desperately needed that laugh

[@victoria139]

In Benji’s defense he might be getting paid by the word in which case I say get that bread

[@kathyflorcruz552]

I think of all lawsuits that way.

[@davidpriestley1650]

If Benjy drops a superchat - can that count as a billable item to the client?

[@justkiddin84]

Oooh, good point! 😂

[@belemnona]

I would bill it if I realised what I was brought into 😂

[@Khahtt13]

If it is billable, what would the line item be? Research? Proofreading tutorial? Educational assistance?

[@CynnamonSpyder]

@@Khahtt13 Sanity check as he failed the roll for initiative

[@davidpriestley1650]

@@Khahtt13 "pre-lawyer lawyering 101"

[@matityahubermanfalk3127]

Janet's interpretation of the phrase "false copyright claim" differs from most people's in parsing rather than substance. She reads it as "false-copyright claim" while normal people read it as "false copyright-claim"

[@MrKdux007]

Janet's class would have to be Cleric Lawyer. She seems to count on faith for facts. "the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen"

[@justkiddin84]

Lawful evil.

[@IOJFJM]

@@justkiddin84it souns more chaotic evil to me 🤪

[@nicolewolfcry7408]

@@justkiddin84 lawful evil requires her to follow some form of logic based on the laws they follow... i fail to see her logic or any framework of law she is following. Sooo chaotic fits better lol

[@LordHonkInc]

Trickery domain Cleric maybe? I mean, it's definitely not Knowledge xD

[@justkiddin84]

@@nicolewolfcry7408 hm, good point!

[@jamie5227]

This series is my favorite thing to listen to while crocheting, please never apologies for the long videos - I will watch it ALL

[@savannamm]

Lmao I'm going through the karen read series while I crochet 😂

[@Julia-543]

@@savannammI was flipping through channels with Karen Read on live the other day, and one of them pulled up a chat where somebody was calling a meeting of the Rage Crochet club 😂

[@jamiecoull7081]

I'm over here painting Ikea furniture and knitting in between coats 😊 I love long vids for this kind of thing.

[@dameazize]

"Things shouldn't happen in Illinois" end of sentence - Brought to you by a person happily living in Illinois, where things shouldn't happen

[@Julia-543]

Hi fellow person living in Illinois! My line throughout has been Janet is an embarrassment to Illinois, and you and I both know thats saying something

[@Debbyjobin]

The thumbnails for these updates. 👌👌👌 🤣

[@jeffcarey3045]

Brains v Brauns

[@PiaPancakes]

Oooooh! 😎

[@lidiaf9598]

That's a good one

[@jenniekoellergarcia280]

I can't believe this is still going!

[@ros8986]

When the Court says "asserting....is nonsensical" it is not a good thing.

[@kanrakucheese]

I looked up the The Amaretto Ranch case. It’s actually a really boring copyright dispute regarding some digital pet files in Second Life.

[@anniealexander9911]

All because KC didn't want LTM's protected speech being mistaken for KC's protected speech

[@mhfuzzball]

Upon information and belief, 'millions' is a larger number than 13,000. Perhaps Witkop will request judicial notice of that, so Janet can't claim it's a fact under dispute.

[@ErinToblerJohnsen]

Runkle should copyright, trademark, and sell merch with "upon information and belief"

[@transsnack]

​@@ErinToblerJohnsen I'd buy a "upon information and belief" hoody!

[@jamie5227]

Not the "upon information and belief" 😂😂😂💀💀💀💀

[@mhfuzzball]

@@jamie5227 At least it wasn't the "what if any."

[@IanBPPK]

A very welcome intersession to the KR trial. Very interested in the KR trial, but a little burnt out on the bs and quite happy to see other pigeon business updates.

[@SewFloSewing]

The burn out really hit me last week and that’s being able to stop, fast forward or just watch a recap by the awesome Runkle. I can’t imagine how the jury is feeling.

[@The_Modeling_Underdog]

Troopah Paul drained me off of what if any last bits of humanity and stuff I had left in me, to be fair. Today was a welcome break from CW's lunacy, and listening to real, competent and agreeable experts was a change for good, at last.

[@ebouwman034]

​@@SewFloSewingHoly... is this actually a jury trial? I cant see a jury taking kindly to any of this BS.

[@genericname8727]

@@ebouwman034 I believe they’re referring to a separate case than the one covered in this video, which is a long way off from a trial if it should even make it that far.

[@Julia-543]

@@ebouwman034we’re talking about the burnout from an entirely different case, a criminal case where the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (aka CW) is prosecuting Karen Read for the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Day 27 (or 28?) of trial is Thursday. Thanks to the schedule of the court, this is the 8th calendar week or something like that. There’s more pigeon business by law enforcement than pigeon business Janet has done, but with a woman facing life in prison, and a police officer dead (and he was the guardian of his niece and nephew, their mom and dad previously died). Today was a day without the jury for questioning of several expert witnesses the defense wants to admit. The CW wanted to question the education & experience of 2 PhDs in engineering who are directors of their areas of their regions at a firm specializing in accident reconstruction. They were hired by the Department of Justice because the FBI is investigating the investigation. Yes, the judge had the case proceed to trial despite the Feds investigating the investigation, and both parties wanting a continuance. Yesterday and Friday, the CW’s expert in accident reconstruction, Massachusetts State Trooper Joe Paul, who was called to the scene the day the victim died and did the accident reconstruction, testified. Despite 8 years in the division for crash reconstruction, and his 3 training courses totaling 120 hours, he struggled to explain what happened, especially when evidence his coworkers never told him about, was told to him by the defense. What he was told at the scene happened, sounded reasonable to him, and he didn’t have models to account for something else, so that’s what he did in his diagram and that’s what he put in his report. He’s been a state trooper for 10 years and has heard the term confirmation bias but had no idea what it meant. He kept talking about how he didn’t know because he didn’t have a model for this. He kept saying it was a sideswipe and his models would underestimate (he meant overestimate) the forces on the body, so he didn’t know. I finally realized he was trying to say the scenario for this accident wasn’t in the computer program or spreadsheet or whatever he usually uses. He didn’t have the knowledge and training to do it without that or have somebody else make a model of it. He testified on direct, that scratches on the SUV (like the kind from shopping carts or little scrapes in parking lots between 2 cars) were likely from the victim’s hands (I think like fingernails), because he had no evidence the SUV had scratches before the (alleged) accident. There’s no evidence paint from the SUV was under the victim’s fingernails or anything. He decided how fast Karen Read was allegedly going when she allegedly hit the victim by identifying a 0.5mph decrease in speed while the accelerator was pushed a consistent amount, on a drive in the vehicle’s recorder. Except, it wasn’t even the right drive because his colleagues didn’t tell him the tow truck driver drove the car onto a flatbed tow truck and then off of the tow truck (he had to count times the car turned on combined with likely mileage for known drives because the records include odometer but not date/time). It’s so ridiculous and infuriating because nobody’s death should be this poorly investigated, and nobody’s freedom should be on the line with this level of just … incompetence at every level of several agencies. Evidence (his blood in the snow) was collected in red solo cups. A leaf blower was used to try to carefully and precisely move snow to reveal taillight pieces. Both of those were things the local police did before the case was transferred from the local police to the state police, once he was fully warmed at the hospital and pronounced dead, because where the body was found was the lawn of a cop.

[@keikoscorner4176]

Okay, before I even watch. I saw the video on my feed and I literally shouted out "Oh! Uncle Runkle has something!" I then froze realizing what I said. Welp! You are Uncle Runkle to me now! lol

[@justkiddin84]

😂😂

[@rebelks88]

I doubt he minds 😂😂😂

[@belemnona]

I prefer elf but used unckleRunkle too 😂

[@gratuitousumlaut1944]

The amount of shade in some of these responses is making my month

[@misselthwaite8230]

Love the Terry Pratchett shoutout ❤

[@justkiddin84]

GNU!

[@Lurksmore]

Roommate has just binge read 3 Pratchett stories.

[@valerie362]

I also gave up after the first season of Survivor. My mom said she'd puke if she heard "alliance" again 😂😂

[@gingy2746]

19:54 "A special little place in my shriveled, little heart" 😂😂 ME too, Runkle, Me too!!!

[@rjaustin1888]

"Hi, Benji!" I was on the floor

[@marysmith3057]

The copyright/dmca thing, I think she was thinking of that guy who pretended he owned the copyright for a bunch of unmonetized songs and received money from KZbin fraudulently. He received $23 million in royalties, but it was more than him just claiming he owned the audio; he forged letters claiming he was the copyright owner. It was beyond just falsely claiming ownership.

[@valerielevasseur8674]

You're right about ostriches. The lies must cease! 😂

[@anniealexander9911]

I think ostriches are angry enough to handle this Scary

[@ChimeraTruely]

Has the judge addressed the discovery issue they will face when it comes to their communications no longer being protected??

[@shewearsfunnyhat]

I hope that Janet and Lauren loose all attorney client privilege. That would be a fitting consequence for this lawsuit.

[@Eeveelyn]

There was for example a situation where many KZbinrs who made videos on a certain videogame got copyright strikes by the games publisher. In some cases this would have resulted in people losing their KZbin account as they got multiple strikes at once. The internet got incredibly mad at that big company. Later it turned out that this wasn't them at all, it was a player with a grudge that impersonated them. Things like this happen and being wrongly accused of making false copyright strikes can harm your reputation and possibly result in an attack by an angry internet mob. So someone making sure that they don't accuse the wrong person should be a good thing and in your clients best interest, not something you sue over.

[@AC-nv9uu]

I cackle at your janet thumbnails every single time 😂

[@meatofmink]

“which dnd class is janet” none the dm booted her for trying to godmode

[@lobdubs]

Janet is an attempted DM PC

[@TeaLoverlne]

Accurate 😂🤣😂

[@MarieBSleepin]

I literally fist pumped in joy when I saw how long the video was. I will watch a video about how stupid Janet and Benji are to any length.

[@PersonWhoIsMe]

It always cracks me up when KZbinrs apologize for long videos... Are you kidding?!? I love long juicy videos keeping me company while I do other things... Thanks for the free entertainment!

[@pristinepastel]

'a very merry sense of regret' would be both an incredibly clever ugly holiday sweater, but also a funny tattoo lollo

[@SomeoneSunshine]

The way my mouth dropped open when you read the part about the pool fence!! What a jab at Lauren!!!

[@divencemoore7111]

Bit of humor: if you've seen the Michael Keaton "BATMAN" movie, Joker's right hand man was Bob the Goon. Bob is really into crime. LOL

[@net-42]

Chocolate Salmon is my new favorite phrase.

[@anniealexander9911]

Waiting for the merch drop

[@Christine__D]

Perfect timing, I didn't know what to do with myself this afternoon 😂

[@greenbeagle13]

😂😂🤣🤣

[@SewFloSewing]

Sameee 😂

[@SewFloSewing]

Do they not get to mention the crazy af cease and desist that Janet and Lauren sent Kitty?

[@MinkxiTes]

It could be they don't since these are replies to what the plaintiffs wrote prior aka debunking. Hopefully they brought it up somewhere else together with the fake wellness check.

[@finallyforfeited]

I'd say no, it's outside of Janet's initial complaint.

[@gratuitousumlaut1944]

They could potentially bring it up as supporting evidence of their claims, but it's not really needed here.

[@BindleBelle]

Outside of the girlie’s themselves, you’re literally the ONLY account I watch for updates and trust them with that!!! Can’t wait to get into this video! Thanks for all you do !!!!

[@matityahubermanfalk3127]

The Mad Catster is also good, but you kinda need to watch Runkle first because TMC seems to base his content on Runkle's videos and often touches on different points, while not going into everything Runkle does.

[@Naedlus]

@@matityahubermanfalk3127 The moment "Deets and reciepts" were mentioned, Mad Catster immediately jumped to mind, and I started to ask myself "Just how out of touch am I that the frequency illusion for that phrase is just hitting me _now_"

[@Kitiarax2000]

Am I the only one who gets Rocky Horror vibes every time Runkle says “Janet.” It makes me smile every time. Xxx

[@Khahtt13]

No, no you aren’t and I love that someone else has mentioned it 😺

[@kittyninja9571]

Me too cracks me up every time

[@CH1M4R4]

Damn it Janet And now the connection is made it's going to live in my head for ev er

[@Kitiarax2000]

@@CH1M4R4 That’s exactly what I had in my head. 💜🖤💜. X

[@Kitiarax2000]

@@CH1M4R4 🤣🤣🤣💜🖤💜

[@MutantAlchemist450]

maybe Janet is an Oathbreaker Paladin attorney?

[@beansquee2383]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Marndarrr]

Apologizing for doing extra work is about as Canadian as it gets. ;) Lol, thanks for the long ones though, fr. Helps eat through my time at work. 👍

[@JennyEliz_IstheShiz]

I love that this steam is 2 hours. Thanks for doing long form!

[@awilly217]

Runkle, you need to start billing Benji for all the “legal advice” you’ve provided to him so far via videos. We might have to crowdsource his tab at this point😂

[@AbbeyHNormal]

Math major here can confirm your math was accurate. 😂

[@Julia-543]

Are you following the Karen Read trial? If not, if you want to torture your brain, I highly recommend Ian’s recaps from Saturday and Monday, where a key witness who should understand some mathematical or physics concepts, just doesn’t

[@AbbeyHNormal]

@@Julia-543 I am and it’s driving me insane. I fully admit that science isn’t my thing, but common sense tells me that what they’re saying doesn’t add up. The display of true experts on Tuesday have me excited for the days ahead though to maybe make some sense out of all of this.

[@LithiumJay]

I'll be honest, the Janet and Illuminaughti cases are starting to get jumbled in my head because it's the same tone in both court docs.

[@owlbyovrprepared1128]

Unhinged and desperate? I need to know where illuminaughtii found her lawyer.

[@anniealexander9911]

Except iilluminaughtii's judge deemed she was not a public figure for the issues of that case. Judge thinks it is based on private life squabbles. Unfortunately Oz got a judge who doesn't really understand what this you tubes thing is that all the young 'uns are watching. The judge us still watching LA Law reruns

[@LithiumJay]

@@anniealexander9911 Yeah, the latest turn in that case is disappointing for all of the defendants - hoping it goes better for the ones here.

[@beck.jan02]

“You’ve got a right to be mean” 😂

[@ros8986]

Dear Elf - we LOVE hearing you fillet lawsuits. Please don't worry about how long it goes on. We can always come back later or skip forward to other items.

[@Steve-YT383]

Janet & Laurens end game doesn't look good. I don't see the upside. Their reputations are shot.

[@Andrew-qw1kq]

Ostriches will put their head down close to the ground as a way to silhouette potential predators against the sky that they couldn't see while standing straight. This behaviour was misinterpreted as then putting their head in the ground when scared.

[@DrLoovely]

I’m living for the ”chocolate-salmon problem”, I’m going to use it as often as I possibly can 😂

[@pbm5903]

I have laughed out loud so nany times throughout this! One thing about Janet: she never fails to amyse me. 😂

[@ademoss80]

I don't know how I missed this.😳 In my defense I have been watching the dumpster fire that is the Karen Read trial. Its totally unhinged and I can't look away. 😂😂

[@larrywest42]

I remember being concerned that your initial commentary could benefit Benji and Janet by helping them cure the glaring defects in their complaint. I now see that they are either unaware of this channel - unlikely, considering Janet's purported specialty - or incapable of learning.

[@isawarenshi]

"I don't want to say it"... The word is competent.

[@mirandajane62]

Love how I wouldn’t have found your channel if it weren’t for Janet and the girlies 😂 & finding out you’re from Edmonton was a trip! I’m from Calgary hahah. Love your channel! ♡

[@jben6335]

"We have a chocolate salmon problem" 🤣🤣🤣

[@tiffanybernier476]

The way I ran to this update

[@ebouwman034]

I'm way too excited for this

[@eloisepharmacist]

Love the Terry Pratchett foot notes 😂😂

[@cassmacdonald-perfectlyimp2486]

Oh this is JUICY! I’ll admit: I DEFINITELY saw Janet getting…ahem…criticised in the courts. Oh GOODY Obviously in my opinion, just my view point etc etc

[@jennifermiller1042]

"You don't put the chocolate with the salmon." 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@marmar.s]

Runkle has white hair except when he uses the purple shampoo 🤭

[@AndrewJohnH]

The second Alzheimer's foundation couldn't remember the first one already existed... for some reason...

[@jenc5898]

Bob Bobson sounds like he might be a friend of Janet's.

[@justkiddin84]

He’s just some dopey dude.😂 Sooo, yep!

[@thesussexbunion]

I expect her to hire Bob Loblaw next.

[@dsn385]

Thanks!

[@AmblingSoulCC]

But was Janet meeting with her team at a high-top bar in the middle of a snowstorm? We need to know!

[@belemnona]

Witnesses say so but she didn't have her GPS on so...

[@evespbj]

Are you sure it was snowing?

[@Julia-543]

I don’t have to pick a lane if the lanes are chocolate and peanut butter? That may be the best news all week!

[@zovjraar]

Idk why "free cake" tickled me so, but I laughed about for a while.

[@jenkatt]

The thumbnail image is PRICELESS

[@goodolearkygal5746]

Im loving runkles imaginary jobs.... last night kitten kickers and today puppy kickers. 😅

[@justkiddin84]

I think Kitty kicker fit better here, tho😂

[@wyldrayne5501]

​@justkiddin84 attempted kitty kicker 😂😂😂😂

[@larrywest42]

A pair of attorneys willfully & repeatedly misconstruing a hypothetical statement ("if you were not retained to represent Propson...") as an assertion is palpably incompetent ... in the most generous possible interpretation.

[@nicolewolfcry7408]

I adore the fact Terry Pratchett gets brought up on so many youtube channels due to his word artistry. And I'm with you on that, Flavorful foot notes are awesome.

[@pastafarians]

I just want to say I have thoroughly enjoyed this entire case so far, and your commentary on top has been the icing on the cake.

[@rickybuhl3176]

'things so obvious that they can not possibly be argued..' - hah! allow me to introduce you to a Trooper and his ideas of physics lol

[@Khahtt13]

😹😹😹 “and stuff”.

[@rickybuhl3176]

@@Khahtt13 Makes me think of Fallout New Vegas and Mr. Fantastic - 'they asked if I had a degree in theoretical physics - I said I had a theoretical degree in physics - they said welcome aboard..'

[@Jessica_O_Bell]

Don't follow the road to Ridiculousness.

[@bratbard]

You explain everything clearly and are quite enjoyable to watch. I love getting notifications when you have a new video uploaded. Thanks

[@SusieSideEye]

That thumbnail is hysterical.

[@beakt]

DEETS AND RECEIPTS!

[@_C_N_]

I think the vast majority of us are fine with, and even welcome, long videos on topics we're interested in. No need to apologize, we're tuning in for your opinions and explanations and those take time to deliver. 🙂

[@chrisbaker8533]

Yes, we are as weird as you are, and we are here for the ride.

[@ahettinger525]

I feel like you should probably scare-quote the word lawyer for Braun, too. Is something wrong with me that I would be much more likely to recognize Ian in my grocery store then Mr Beast?

[@justkiddin84]

Nope! The Beast would not be noticed by me, either, but I would buy Ian a good beer immediately!

[@nathanglasser6845]

I wouldn't even remotely care if I saw Mr Beast. Ian would get a nod. Wouldn't want to bother him. That likely has a lot to do with my constant anxiety, though.

[@belemnona]

Same

[@BinarySecond]

Can't believe I've been watching this thinking you were Mr Beast, what a betrayal.

[@BinarySecond]

There's grabbing the bull by the horns and ignoring the bull and hoping no one notices until the bull gores you

[@croach2194]

It is hard to express how much I enjoy your videos. You are very good at educating lay people in the laws of various jurisdictions, the meaning of legal arguments and other judicial issues. I am proud that we have a lawyer like you keeping an eye on justice systems for us.

[@GenuineUntelligence]

The very fact that some people only eat meat from animals kept in "free range" or "enriched" environments for ethical reasons where other people refuse to eat any meat at all for ethical reasons means that what is ethical could never be properly defined.

[@krab1791]

Ian you got recognized on a plane 😂

[@campinglady81]

Thanks, Ian! 💙

[@jamiekuryla3940]

Truthfully Runkle i stopped caring about this case i just like the way you explain the case, thanks for keeping up with it.

[@SilverAlaunt]

50:48 Cue "I fought the law and the law won"

[@CarlaHowatt]

Listening to Ian say - at 2x the speed - ‘puppy kicker’ over and over made me laugh out loud.

[@talkstosocks2]

The girlies lawyer might not be watching you, but Runkle, you got a call out on DWKT in a recent episode. A legal topic came up and they were like "We need Runkle!"

[@coyoteartist]

Ostriches who can't escape sensed danger flop to the ground and lay their head as low as possible to appear as part of the terrain. Another reason for the myth is they dig nests as deep as two feet and about 3 feet wide. These nests may hold up to 50 eggs from an number of mothers and they use their beaks to turn the eggs several times a day to keep them all evenly heated.

[@Poppytastic101]

Benjy appears to be following the advice of Rumpole of the Bailey -"when the law is against you argue the facts, when the facts are against you argue the law, when the law and the facts are against you give the opposing counselling hell." Only he is unable to do so...

[@leerowley70]

Pack a lunch, snacks and dinner! 😊

[@gneissnicebaby]

I think Janet's DnD character class would be a bard-rogue multi-class starting at level 2 with a -1 to charisma, wisdom, and intelligence. They're that player at the table who rolled bad stats for the character they had in mind and instead of coming up with an alternative they decided to just really struggle for the entire campaign just for the fun of it, essentially handicapping the rest of the party to the point where they have to actively strategize around the fact that they got a party member who's a crap bard and a dumb, unobservant, rogue.

[@TeaLoverlne]

🤣😂🤣

[@timothybayliss6680]

Lol... "Legally Hilarious " merch