Russia and China vs USA and NATO | Military Comparison 2022 | Data First

Hello KZbin from this video you can watch a military power comparison between Russia and China vs USA and NATO. Russia, China, and the USA are the world's major leading countries in military power and NATO is a military organization formed by a combination of 30 nations including the United States. NATO is mainly considered as the opposition of Russia and China. So let's compare the military power of each nation in a side-by-side comparison video.
Please Note: All the images in this video belong to their respectful owners.
Watch More
NATO Vs China Military Power Comparison 2022
• NATO Vs China Military...
India vs china military comparison 2022
• India vs china militar...
Ukraine Vs Russia Military Power 2022
• Ukraine Vs Russia Mili...
Spain vs Germany country comparison (2022)
• Spain vs Germany count...
Subscribe Us
kzbin.info/door/UnN...
Music Credits
The Great Battle by Alexander Nakarada | www.serpentsoundstudios.com
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Music promoted by www.chosic.com/free-music/all/
Hostiles Inbound by Miguel Johnson | / migueljohnsonm. .
Music promoted by www.chosic.com/free-music/all/
Creative Commons CC BY 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Thank you for watching, Subscribe and stary with Data First.

[@tyrannatom9802]

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks it was a dumb idea to do us and nato and not just nato

[@jkjkman8565]

Hahahaha so true

[@BOSS_KOTLETKA]

Nah its interesting to see how much of the NATO military is us

[@johndoe35717]

Us and Europe are the same thing

[@Moonfitz69]

@@johndoe35717they ain’t lol

[@johndoe35717]

@@Moonfitz69 if we get into a war we are.

[@slovac6533]

It is easy to understand who the aggressor is if you look at the number of offensive and defensive systems. Someone just wants to protect their country.

[@reyne6420]

The aggression of the country is regarded not by the number of weapons, but by a violation of the UN Charter

[@samjack8300]

US and Russia both Attack countrys and Not Just protect themselves

[@user-rj9vk9lw8v]

​@@reyne6420联合国是谁家的？你是来搞笑的

[@reyne6420]

@@user-rj9vk9lw8v Read my answer again.....

[@amidala1789]

​@@reyne6420read his again

[@user-qj7om7vo1i]

Иметь технику в арсенале и уметь ей владеть, это разные вещи😉

[@brianmck7363]

Thank you for being honest..🤟

[@BLNH_C_MACLoM]

У нас ни то ни другое

[@AntonGermanReal]

Russia learned that the hard way

[@skritmanoriginal7426]

Почему то нацистом владение не помогло от сша и ссср, как и нам не поможет сейчас.

[@armyan_mafia]

@@skritmanoriginal7426 да, вам, хохлонацистам никакая техника НАТО не поможет)

[@user-hv8cc2nl9f]

May I translate and reprint your video on Bilibili?

[@boahey38]

USA and NATO? Like Europe and France? Or India and Mumbai? NATO and QUAD would be more realistic I think.

[@totalnerd5674]

There are talks of Vietnam joining QSD/QUAD, which would be pretty funny because NATO would be allied with a communist country in that scenario

[@aheat3036]

😂 India & Mumbai? No!

[@10birdss]

“Any country becomes a wealthy country if it is friendly with the United States and Japan, and a beggar country if it is friendly with the Soviet Union and China.” This phrase became a Korea proverb in the 20th century.

[@gjovalinmhilli325]

No

[@voidwalker9223]

@@totalnerd5674 communism? do you even know what communism is? Vietnam is a socialist republic. Far from communism.

[@Ungovernable_Schizo]

Love how you used the Russian Assault Class from BATTLEFIELD4 for the thumbnail on US/NATO side

[@methcooker6402]

Very western yes

[@denixgg]

Ура что-то про батлфилд4

[@NCRtrooper558]

Lol yeah

[@miscalidoss8467]

Increible Solo 2 Paises Son Muy Superiores a Los Mas De 30 Paises De La Otan, Sin Contar Otros Aliados A Rusia Como India, Iran, Corea Del Norte

[@bobjunior1121]

dumb comment india not russia allies and yeah luxembourg is comparable to china of course and where did you see russia and china superior ? otan is obviously more superior the quantity of soliders dont make an army stronger

[@AntiFurry927]

Most nato countries are just small states like Lithuania. It’s really France and Britian + USA/Germany vs China and Russia

[@fabiopalumbo2788]

Because the union make the force. India will never go with Russia an china, also Brazil. Last year Sweden and Finland joined NATO, next will be ukraine

[@user-pi5tz7or9n]

​@@fabiopalumbo2788hasn’t the realization come yet that either Ukraine will be a non-aligned state, or there will be no state of Ukraine itself?

[@fabiopalumbo2788]

@@user-pi5tz7or9n It will be an indipendent state. Nato is just a defensive alliance . If one member is attacked every member join to help. Brazil and India and also china will never be against NATO members for one important reason. They earn a lot of money with the commercial routes for Europe and USA . And also a lot of them are living in our countries. In the case of Brazil, a lot of them are descendants of Europeans.

[@cesarcesped4348]

You should make a Nato vs BRICS comparison

[@Naixel1]

Comparing Nato to BRICS is like comparing an apple to meat, BRICS is not a military alliance

[@underground5033]

You either count USA in NATO or you don’t but you can’t exactly count NATO & the US as separate unless you’re excluding all the recourses the US brings in.

[@whatsallintheinternet4281]

He counts both but seperates the USA just for fun. For exxample Nato has 20 000 armored vehicle and USA 10 000. He does not mean that it is 30 000. Did you look everytime the Total number??? haha

[@ghostwarrior9569]

@@whatsallintheinternet4281 3:24 armored vehicles Usa 45193 , Nato (including USA)115855 . Total 161048 3:37 mrap USA 25700 . Nato including USA 27192 .total 52892. 4:46 total aircrafts Russia 4174 . China 3284 . Total 5458 So finde the mistakes And there I stopped to watch this video

[@weiningding3166]

Need go back to elementary school for maths! Such a dummy, waste lots of natural resources.

[@underground5033]

@@weiningding3166 can’t even type a correct sentence, seems like you needa go back to school 😂

[@DarlintonDilichi]

We don't pray war

[@aliknoname3478]

Все говорит о том что в РФ и Китае оборонительное оружия больше чем наступательного, в отличие от США и блока НАТО.

[@andromeda8013]

Да, но толку от этого не много

[@alekseyeroshenko8335]

Потому что мы никогда не на подали в отличии от других стран,СВО исключение рано или поздно не мы так соседи напали.Не зря сейчас многие бывшие президенты хвалятся что Минские соглашения нужны были для укрепления и накачки оружия Украине!

[@andromeda8013]

@@alekseyeroshenko8335 ну так по итогу Россия на Украину напала

[@alekseyeroshenko8335]

@@andromeda8013 а выбора не было,8 лет утюжили Донецк!Мирными соглашениями и не пахло,дураку ясно было что на этом запад и Украина не остановилась бы,любой человек знающий историю понимает что сша и запад хочет видит Россию слабой но этого не будет!

[@andromeda8013]

@@alekseyeroshenko8335 ты в Донецке был то? Ты хотя бы знаешь где этот Донецк находится? Если бы на Россию хотели бы напасть, это произошло бы ещё 90-х, она тогда бы сдалась без единого выстрела. ВС РФ бомбят Херсон, а ВСУ по Донецку хуярят так, как не было за все 8 лет. Ахуенно помогли 👍

[@user-dn2sd1ck3i]

Русский самолёт стоит 10 миллионов долларов, а американский 100 миллионов долларов. Американская техника стоит в 10 раз дороже русской. Поэтому сравнивать военные бюджеты тут не корректно. Если 154 миллиарда умножить на 10, то бюджет российской армии 1,54 триллиона долларов)) 20% российской армии воюет против 51 одной страны НАТО на Украине. Которые туда поставили техники на 500 миллиардов долларов. Это 3 бюджета российской армии. Плюс 1 миллион смелых украинских солдат. Солдаты НАТО и США давно бы в памперсы наложили. Украинские солдаты, кто бы что не говорил, тоже русские. Жаль что стравили оба народа.

[@Mc.Drive14]

The Russian army has not advanced since 2014 just against the Ukrainian army without mobilizing the people, not like the Russians 😂Having to buy weapons from North Korea 😂 it's really embarrassing.. Russia is already completely surrounded on all sides 😅Without navies or boats, the Ukrainians wiped out a large part of the Russian fleet. You don't want to see the US Navy + NATO on top of that 😂 That would be too easy ✌️ let’s hope that Poutine isn’t so suicidal

[@user-jl8xj4pc6h]

Хотелось бы узнать соотношение гиперзвукового оружия. И количество вооружения Ирана и Северной Кореи.

[@488ALEX]

А какое соотношение вы хотите увидеть? У России "Кинжал" и "Циркон" - максимально приближенные к полноценному гиперзвуку, у остальных пока в процессе разработки.

[@rdxedf5923]

@@488ALEX Кстати, Кинжал это аэробаллистическая ракета, но способная развивать скорость гиперзвука и таковой считается, ибо ее невозможно сбить. А вот Циркон абсолютно полностью гиперзвуковая ракета

[@user-xx7dq9gt4t]

​@@rdxedf5923клоун в рашке не могут создать автомобиль не смеши

[@rdxedf5923]

@@user-xx7dq9gt4t да что ты говоришь, тот же КАМАЗ, Урал и куча других российских марок вполне успешно делается и потребляется. Идут на экспорт и внутренний рынок. Побольше злись, рагуль, у самого страна в заднице, но главное что там в рашке да?

[@brokenfingerz3481]

@@user-xx7dq9gt4t ты наверное оттуда, раз тебе есть что сказать(хотя я по профилю уже понял, что ты именно оттуда). Интересно посмотреть, как автомобиль принесёт такой же импакт, как ракета. Есть слово такое, "приоритет". Работает в оба конца, да, не отрицаю. А ещё в рашке не могут создать эксклюзивы Apple, да-да, прикинь

[@sebapiotr6736]

You counted USA twice in many charts. NATO figure already included US.

[@Wizack_Twizack]

Nah. Rather USA then nato then total

[@Zeraya86]

@@Wizack_Twizack but Usa is part of nato, i don't get why the figures are separate.

[@carlazar1233]

@@Zeraya86 THAT'S HOW THEY CALCULATING THEIR GDP ,PAPERS ARE HARDEST THING IN THE WORLD IT HOLDING A LOTS IF SHIT

[@Wizack_Twizack]

@@Zeraya86 but they calculating separately first then adding nato without usa. Usa is obviously the biggest part of nato. But nato without usa is also huge.

[@eipi5173]

Just showing NATO who their Daddy is.

[@makingmoney8405]

Very cool videos . I’ll subscribe and like . You make nice comparisons and have great data and put effort into what you do .

[@habe2833]

The data is really really bad....

[@mnpipi3329]

How do you know if it is good data when you don't know the source?

[@xilijetgames]

Interesting video

[@Quartusdecimus]

It's easy to see who is preparing for war, and who is simply ready to defend his country.

[@TheLastCrumb.]

That’s ridiculous. X amount for usa. X amount for rest of NATO including the USA and proceeds to adding them together 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@pebe1900]

we dont need alot we have the skills what the dont have

[@MV-tf7ev]

@@pebe1900 what u on anout

[@jmcglinchey2589]

I believe its USA excluded from the nato numbers

[@jmcglinchey2589]

I stand corrected u r rite

[@BlooDstorm-um4rj]

Its united states and nato . Should be only nato but he doesnt add them . Nato is nato with usa included in the stats given

[@Matt-sg4bm]

Think some of the adding up is wrong and things like frigates and submarines is wrong too...still an interesting video

[@TheWarriorsFromHell]

apperently the US coast guard didn't get counted in this, as well as the navy ship numbers are a bit off, they do have patrol boats in the navy and though they have no frigates they have alot of cruisers and destroyers

[@jimmyv1753]

The thing is. This isn’t really how war works. Not since the old days of lining up and firing at each other. Todays wars are far more complex. China holds the production cards and that will be significant. But they also rely on the us for a huge chunk of their revenue. More than they are willing to step away from id bet which is why they’ve never made a legit step against the us or nato. They tip toe around the edges. The best option for everyone is to stop allowing 2 dozen assholes decide for the entire world that we will all kill each other

[@hit47n]

Also the US has many machines etc that are not “in service.” Many of these machines still operate, including but not limited to some aircraft carriers.

[@honestjohn6222]

I think it’s not how much you have it’s the quality and how you use it !

[@derterex6966]

speaking as it is at the moment, unfortunately Russian weapons are superior to all analogues in the world, they cope with everyone in the war with Ukraine, although more than 30 countries are fighting there, they all provide assistance in the form of heavy and light weapons, from machine guns to tank planes . NATO and other countries spent more money than Russia, in this war Russia is the clear winner (

[@zlonczekk7088]

@@derterex6966 and now you can start to laugh

[@dreambim2446]

@@derterex6966 Superior my ass.

[@thatonelocalauthority2809]

@@derterex6966 cope and seethe.

[@luftim]

Nope.... Its about the economy... US with NATO countries hold 60% of all wealth on planet earth... Money wins wars. Erwin Rommel was a genious field marshel for nazi germany, but it did him little with out any equipment.

[@stevie6621]

Bear + Dragon vs 30 barking dogs.

[@nathanielbradford8974]

No bear+dragon vs 29 barking and 1 eagle

[@Ohlalatay13]

@@nathanielbradford8974 the way france and britain remained strong during history and even today says otherwise

[@user-vn7wb9nm6d]

NATO dogs 🐕 😅

[@maxtaylor9237]

Bear vs 1 barking dog doesn't seem to be going too well for you atm haha 😅

[@ajas41]

russia is beyond joke these days. They cant take fcking ukraine. Imagine Nato vs Russia warfare, withouse nukes cause in that way there will be no russia as well. Russia would get wrecked.

[@00leonl]

兩個國家足以對抗整個北約

[@LovemoreMatanda]

Madness

[@Leokul]

such a character . It's just not fair to Russia and China. Putin said that he wanted to resolve everything peacefully, but did someone from Europe And the United States listen to him?​@@LovemoreMatanda

[@ricardosamalot6058]

Nobody knows who has who or what cause it’s the experience and combat training you need and I hope it doesn’t go this far cause they need to resolve this. Well that’s my opinion each his own!

[@justinlewis9626]

... so much wrong with this, half of the time they add the US and NATO together when it already says including the US and for the Tankers they put the A-10 Warthog for the US...

[@Qoutlanders]

05:11 United States counts 783. Nato (including United States) counts 1200 Total: 1983 i thought it was including ???

[@pok1mon999]

maths problem😁😁

[@luftim]

@@user-ut2qu8ji9z Support your self for ones... Stop migrating and help your own country up.

[@jmjm1920]

No need to count that US airforce alone ahead both combined😅 the biggest killer tanks is nothing 😊

[@sadianadeem9667]

@5:42 you wrote 2,822 Trainer Aircraft for NATO including USA's 2,661, yet you add them again in total, kindly correct it.

[@jotliner]

what about the Destroyers and Cruisers?

[@juliocesarmorenocruz9329]

it is difficult to know exactly the number of war vehicles and aircraft and warships. etc. all countries keep that information secret

[@przemyslawrozycki946]

I was waiting for that video! Great subject!

[@stevevon6159]

Counting looks a bit skewed but should be a good scrap anyway

[@danielballard3364]

Seems Finland needs to be included as well from today on, maybe provide an updated video soon?

[@EcoZen24]

+10 soldiers

[@user-et7ll4ce8x]

If this war was based on such statistics, China would not have to fight the United States in the Korean War 70 years ago. At that time, China had neither air force nor Navy. It actually pushed the United States to the south of line 38. As Chinese, we have more say because we are fighting the United Nations. During the Korean War, the US military carried out the best cooperation on sea, air and land. Türkiye's army is the bravest. , they sacrificed themselves and delayed the attack of the 39th army of China. The second American division will be wiped out. The British are also very brave. In the second stage of the battle on the western front of North Korea, the British army was responsible for covering the withdrawal of US troops after rest, while the South Korean soldiers were the least efficient. At that time, the main tactic of our army was to defeat the North Korea army and surround the US Army from the side. A major problem of the US military is its weak will to fight. As long as their logistics are cut off, this is the surrender of the whole system. The strength of Canadian and Australian troops on the Korean battlefield is relatively weak and can be basically ignored.

[@user-lo6ei8ys3i]

лухта гэты ваш кітай.. як там уйгуры сябе адчуваюць?

[@tom_king390]

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i Have you been there?

[@tom_king390]

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i your usa father say alway right😃

[@siberianresort5722]

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i If you don't know, it is enough to show that your information is closed and false freedom of speech

[@StrategicFooyouAgency-dg8yh]

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i I am Uyghur, we live very well, the only bad thing is that affected by the epidemic, the income is not high, last year my family only earned about 200,000 US dollars

[@user-up9ou9bt4h]

Love your mathematical abilities..

[@artmoney2135]

Military forces are not enough to defend the country, while a country defended by the people is invincible.🐻

[@GeoGamingNation]

One time England sent military to a place in Russia can’t remember the place but the people beat the soldiers of which there were more

[@steviewonder7495]

Invincible against 50 hypersonic intercontinental nukes travelling through the edge of space at 16000mph, or 50 nukes travelling 100 feet over the north pole ice from russia to usa under radar at 7000mph. The only thing the invincible people can do is bend over and kiss their ass goodbye.

[@artmoney2135]

@@GeoGamingNation I don’t remember, it’s a cool trick🤣🤣🤣, remember how 200 football fans from Russia piled on your 1000 at the World Cup, then your journalists and congressmen complained that it was not cultural to fuck all British fans on their own soil and that was 200 against the whole of Britain

[@elrojo4379]

@@GeoGamingNation 1918 in the artic circle, the USA and England invaded Russia to try and stop the "spread " of communism. The war the USA and England try to hide from history because they got their as kicked LoL.

[@GeoGamingNation]

@@elrojo4379 ikr

[@GerManDique]

Better compare relatively also, based on GDP (economic power).

[@joaopaulovinhote3691]

Rússia não é o Iraque, a Rússia não está lutando somente com a Ucrânia,ela está enfrentando sozinha a Otan.

[@westleighivaan6753]

all in all,i hope the world will be peace

[@XFr4ctor]

Infos in the video are chaotic... in some type of weapons usa and nato numbers are combined in others not. NATO and USA nuclear weapons are over 5900 for example... only USA have over 6000 by itself

[@HawkyIO]

yeah unfortunately he did many mistakes

[@I_am_cyka]

НАКОНЕЦТО ЧЕСТНОЕ сравнение, 2 страны против 31

[@nathanlee9386]

What about destroyers and battleships?

[@stefyt7308]

Total submarines for NATO seemed fishy, I checked it, the figure you posted is not the correct one, as USA have 68 and only adding Turkey's 12 submarines that makes 80, ignoring the ones from other countries.

[@vladimirvojak3982]

😂

[@lee9000]

I think some of your numbers are off, for instance submarines. Your figures suggest the rest of NATO has only 10 subs, but the UK has 10 active attack and missile boats, so do the other 28 members have no subs? Also for some of your data, you counted the US twice in the totals!

[@artyom3171]

he didn't you could read it there buddy :)

[@blademaster2390]

@@artyom3171 i think he meant the sections in NATO reading “(in all 30 countries including the US).” Which to be fair, is true, but also makes complete sense, as the US is a founding member of NATO.

[@TheLastCrumb.]

@@blademaster2390 along with a number of other founding members

[@tomasrazo1815]

A lot these numbers are off sadly, just for example he has 12k tanks for Russia in both this video and Russia vs. NATO video. But has 7.5k for this video and 20k+ for the other video? Even if it's just negligence on CC part, misinformation is misinformation....

[@_jenkins_7775]

Even four Borey-class submarines will be enough for Russia

[@ljubisarepac1596]

SERBIA RUSIJA FULL VICTO.....

[@matabisnis]

where is the data source?

[@SUPERLEGENDPUBGMOBILE]

Bottom line: let's live together 🤝

[@bloodpimpgangster]

As you name suggests; Absolute Legend.

[@itsleksa8230]

the fact finland has more reverses than nato they have 900000 reverses

[@CagedMuscle1]

a good chunk of those reservists do not live in Finland, in order to keep their citizenship they have to do 6 months training as reservists and be called to war if it ever happens

[@johnowl6070]

@@CagedMuscle1 Do not live in Finland? Damn... Please tell me the source. I suppose some flat earthers or E.T.s told you that?

[@CagedMuscle1]

@@johnowl6070 my source is a Finland reservist who completed basic training and is an active soldier, Finland goes to war he gets called back. Have a nice day, bud

[@johnowl6070]

@@CagedMuscle1 Also, many of the reservists have 8, 9, 11 or 12 months of training plus review exercises to top that.

[@CagedMuscle1]

@@johnowl6070 agreed, I was just stating the basic training

[@wholeworld1215]

Dear video creator , please consider , you've included US twice when you calculate total numbers of military equipments

[@johnmoyer9719]

Sorry but the picture of an A-10 under "Tankers" kinda made me questions the credibility.

[@derluftpenner7018]

6:10 Why is there a A-10?

[@bc.epicadventures9567]

doesn't matter what number each country really has. Its WHO has the most experience in real live combat and training.

[@lucasschepp6284]

It’s who’s bombs hit harder these day sadly

[@529frank6]

Its WHO has the lowest moral level and act like a shit stirrer in the world.

[@adelnogol6499]

​@@lucasschepp6284 bcoz of who's keep spreading and building military base everywhere on other people's land.

[@noncekilla8848]

Russia

[@mnpipi3329]

Dream on

[@rodperkins1]

I dont get it. If we have it like that so why is a Proxy war being fought then? just curious

[@SESEZA23]

потому что ядрён-батон

[@pavlodarhimeraz]

It's not money that wins, but smart military and high-quality equipment, weapons, etc., but judging by the amount of money that affects NATO, they were clearly founded not for protection but for attack! 💪🏻🇷🇺

[@suckyourdeadnan4805]

Your delusional mate 😂

[@poppysquarepants]

are you brain dead?

[@RESPECT35483]

Russia num 1 no Doubt 😮😮

[@suckyourdeadnan4805]

@@RESPECT35483 💀💀💀

[@PresidentsPlayhouse]

​@@RESPECT35483no way you said that brother

[@CodiakLBJfan]

the music at 3:16 is the same music that is used in some animated dragon ball super manga's, and it was always an awesome battle theme....definitely an awesome battle theme here too!

[@jbqu3142]

The music and voice are annoying and hyper boring!

[@CodiakLBJfan]

@@jbqu3142 so was your mom

[@jbqu3142]

@@CodiakLBJfan ask your mom why your dad finish making you while urinating, she knows.

[@CodiakLBJfan]

@@jbqu3142 umad?

[@kevinzaswd5867]

1:32 Dont combine all countries together.. you probably dont know what military rank index is. The lower the score the better. You should have just done the "mean" of all the countries

[@johnsolis4171]

Do it yourself

[@kevinzaswd5867]

​@@johnsolis4171 Why? Isnt this video supposed to be informing us of military power? They gave us false information so why should I be doing something they supposed to do be doing for me

[@user-wy7iw8fh7i]

In Russia 22.000 tanks

[@user-wy7iw8fh7i]

В России 22.000 танков

[@user-di8th5dc8u]

Russia prooved, quantity doesnt mean quality

[@user-zf3ov8sv6w]

Hahhahahahahahhah news sayd?

[@EE-dm9uv]

You mean the unit of loss?

[@user-ws1mr9en3n]

Russian using URSS miltary riserve, dont update technology in ukreine

[@ich_bin_Pavel]

​@@user-ws1mr9en3nСмешно! Русские производят, и производят новую военную тенхнику!

[@Trailbuilders_ru]

​@@user-ws1mr9en3nalso as Ukrainian forces, who had a lot of old soviet tanks, artillery and aircrafts. Much more than they had got from western countries. But not old USSR reserves nor new western supplies didn't help them.

[@whicker59]

Regardless of who pairs up with whom, the next global war will b fought with strategic bombers, fighters, missiles of all types, and aircraft carriers. Troop numbers, tanks, etc not so important as previous wars.

[@Hayabusa-lo6bc]

Short-range ballistic missiles, ICBMs, strategic bombers and elite military units that are incredibly trained are in the 21st century.

[@aheat3036]

That’s exactly where the USA & NATO have the advantage!

[@gunterodim1535]

@@aheat3036 China will soon be able to simply buy NATO. Or blackmail with sanctions. No one will even fight ...

[@whicker59]

@@aheat3036 let's just pray Bundling Biden doesn't hurt us too badly until real american first leadership returns.

[@steviewonder7495]

Not so important, just 8 billion peoples lives at stake when tempers flare and 20,000 worldwide nukes come out to play from 16 nuclear countries.

[@kidshelleen51]

Frigates and Corvettes, give me a break. How about missile launching Destroyers or guided missile Cruisers?

[@TheOhlavrac]

Inventario esta correto????

[@PsevdNN]

Россия и Китай сильная держава!

[@hju6326]

false

[@PsevdNN]

@@hju6326 true

[@some2189]

Rev 13:2-3: "And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast."

[@Devoni_RU]

Всё идёт к этому.

[@Tazawar24]

Do you know what this means?

[@Hehe_girl447]

its the quality that counts...

[@48lanlan]

Homie i am kinda lost watching this. 4:45 4173 from russia and 3285 from china adds up to 5458? what?

[@lessyk2414]

Where is hypersonic weapon ? lol 😂

[@_jenkins_7775]

Так оно только у России есть

[@digitalbusiness8108]

The total reserve personnel @2:55 for US/NATO is 610 000 Million. 😂

[@Akiskycat]

The population of NATO and America IS 990Million how they have an army of 610million?

[@AndreyPalpatine]

С пенсионерами и новорожденным детьми?

[@instrolane2205]

The new battlefield game should be based on this

[@jesusmichaelpenaramirez1343]

Ufff si se enfrentan esas potencias el mundo colapsa

[@lszujo73]

the quality of the equipment and the highly trained service men can't be enumerated yet it would be decisive in a conflict

[@CAB11204]

Man, NATO is GOAT

[@Quartusdecimus]

Without the U.S. of course they are not so)

[@CAB11204]

@@Quartusdecimus Still, the British, the French, the Italians, and the Germans have some of the best gdp’s and militaries in the world. So yeah, without the US, it’s a big loss to NATO, but it would still be quite powerful

[@thatonelocalauthority2809]

@@Quartusdecimus Even without the US factored in, NATO would still outperform Russia and China in every way.

[@amidala1789]

@@CAB11204 🤣

[@_jenkins_7775]

Сармат, авангард и ярс так не думают)

[@jumbo4gz960]

What if asia vs Nato+Usa?

[@dalestrawn8361]

I didn't know an A-10 Warthog was a tanker

[@user-so2ri2px8w]

As an Italian and so as a member of the Atlantic alliance, I have enormous respect for China and Russia.

[@hanryhenry6612]

We both know that you are russian 😂

[@maximus822]

😂😂😂

[@user-so2ri2px8w]

@@maximus822 why u laghin

[@hanryhenry6612]

@@user-so2ri2px8w we are laugh because we see a lot of russians like you pretending to be other nationality to manipulate others 😂

[@italian_person]

im italian too, and 1. ciao :D 2. same but not with the governments.

[@davidchin1008]

Air- USA Land - Russia Sea - China

[@mdZomi]

Land - India Everything - Russia Propaganda - Usa Fake - China

[@chitmyataung732]

Sea - USA

[@mdZomi]

@@chitmyataung732 USA is strong in all if they want oil🙄

[@LawrenceJohn-rc5zr]

bullshit@@mdZomi

[@Alone-fx6uh]

​@@mdZomiyah that's why they're scared to send F-16 to Ukraine.

[@iweryyy]

You should do: USA,Nato,Australia,Japan,Philippines,South Korea,Taiwan,Canada Arabia Vs Russia, China, India, North Korea, Iran, Belarus, Yemen, Serbia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Algeria.

[@iweryyy]

Indonesia, South Africa, the Taliban, are with Russia. And Ukraine is with America. Let there be a video made with all the US allies and the Russian Federation!

[@Floppanotofficial]

Kazakhstan is neutral, but as a kazakh I support Russia

[@user-is6tu3rb7p]

Аргентина против России, Казахстан, Индия, Бразилия нейтральны

[@Ohwfull]

@Data first, which data? Why do NATO allies such as Japan and Australia are not represented? And why there is no data on transport instrastructure, like roads, telecommunication, ports or airports? How do you win a war in 21st century without massive global hegemony on those parameters? Where is the economic data?

[@DangerClose0608]

That would have been a fantastic video had it not had quite a bit of bad info. Carriers for one. How is Russia ranked that high with one out of commission carrier that may never be sea worthy again?

[@brianforrester9670]

Not only that, but it's diesel powered. US carriers can operate off our shores, in theory, for decades.

[@superplaya8]

@@brianforrester9670и что будет делать твой авианосец против ракет типа Ярс и Сармат?

[@corbanavar4700]

Авианосцы это баржи для уничтожения Россией. Если война то кто даст возможность приблизиться на расстояние эффективности истребителей? Эти корыта только для войны с банановыми республиками. Россия один большой непотопляемый авианосец. Россия не собирается идти на США с кораблями. Для США у России есть Авангарды со скоростью 30000 км/ч. И бюджеты неправильно сравнивать в долларах. Россия за 1 миллион доллар создает оружия столько же, сколько США за 10 миллионов долларов.

[@cgmaster]

@@superplaya8 быстро идти на дно!)

[@user-dy6qf5yd5q]

А что авианосец реально может. Он страшен только для банановых республик и ножен только морским державам. Россия сухопутная держава, поэтому авианосцы не в приоритете. А сравнивать мощь России и США бессмысленно. Слишком разные доктрины и подход к вооруженным силам. Те операции, на которые способны США, Россия ни когда проводить не будет и наоборот. Прямое столкновение тоже невозможно. Хотя я могу написать сценарий. Год первый, США уверенно побеждают. Армия России находится в руинах. Огромные потери. Год второй. США захватывают значительную часть территории России. Победа близка. Год третий. До окончания войны остаются считанные дни. Российская армия разбита. Год четвертый США подписывают договор о капитуляции и отдают половину всех территорий, а на против Капитолия стоит памятник русскому солдату. Откуда я это знаю? Да по такому сценарию проходили примерно все войны России. Всегда Россия проигрывала, потом приростала территориями. Вот и сейчас сценарий повторяется. СССР развалился, у нас было поражение за поражением на Украине, а к 30 году новая Россия будет по территории больше СССР.

[@wk9041]

You left out cruisers and destroyers a significant part of the US fleet.

[@pranavgandhar4604]

China and Russia have advance in hypersonic missile, Russia 1 hypersonic missile in enough to destroy whole aircraft carrier .. That what Us lags..

[@CodiakLBJfan]

@@pranavgandhar4604 you really think there aren't systems in place to deal with those things? Look up an organization called DARPA, then get back to me. Not to mention, the more important fight that nobody is talking about....space.

[@pernellmckay306]

Hypersonic missiles are not really all that hyped up to be nor are they a new technology the US had secret government hypersonic missile department under research during the 1960’s but shut them down also ballistic missiles aren’t that different, all missiles share that same hypersonic speed when they first launch, Elon musks rockets probably have the fastest but the US is always developing secret researchers without letting the public know but all in all I think tactics, strategy and luck are the biggest game changers in a war.

[@technoartfest8708]

@@pranavgandhar4604 and if armed with a nuke.. the hypersonic not even need to hit directly. it can explode 5,000 altitude , in the center of an entire fleet. with hundreds of warships ,and destroy all of them.

[@technoartfest8708]

@@CodiakLBJfan Not thinking is a fact.. USA can't intercept hypersonic missiles.. They can't intercept misisles they don't have. lol and they themselves told they have no defense against Russia hypersonic missiles.. this is why they w orking in their own tech , to catchup russia in next years.. that's the hope. AND Money alone don't create advanced weapons. you need really good scientist and experience for that.

[@Lucarellii]

Dude, can u calculate right? Total Aircraft Russia+ China 4173+3285=5458???? I found couple mistakes...

[@lancelotdulac6076]

A. any stats should take into account Russia's heavy losses in their war in Ukraine, B. also how outdated most of their remaining equip is (Soviet era tanks from even 1950s and whatnot)

[@akorneev1321]

Как можно сравнивать эти боевые державы? Если НАТО начнёт войну с Россией, то не будет победителей, что тут вам непонятно? Какая разница сколько у вас кораблей и вертолётов?

[@aveskie_phgaming]

NATO and US is an alliance you combined in one NATO vs China/Russia

[@iln0id228]

please make Russia and China vs USA pls pls pls pls

[@daddicatyo7170]

China..Russia and North Korea VS nato ..USA.. Japan.. South Korea and many more countries..this would be tuff

[@linusfeustel9537]

Did ya Saw the AT-10 as Tanker 😂

[@Megamanhurhur]

Dont forget people, this is a Nato that has been spending very little on military over the last 30 years. This has all changed now so expect those Nato numbers to increase rather sharply. Also not counted in those numbers is countries in the Quad.

[@Xyz-jb2uf]

North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation. SLAVA RUSSIA!!! BRICS!!!

[@GigiRiveraLanuza]

Don't Forget That The ASEAN Alliance could tip that scale if they feel compelled. Because it's about What Economy can do for their countries since that is their Region so they may Ally with Who will support their trade. Asia can be its own World they have already establish what they need they don't need the west to sustain considering Russias partnership. So the west would be secluded to their own. If Africa felt compelled to ally With the East Then It Would start How it was in The Ancient Times Africa And Asia Trade. 🙏🏽😅😂I'm done seeing Both of Those Countries Oppressed, let my People Go all of my orphaned children from force poverty🙏🏽

[@eduardshlichko3866]

Да да, возрастут А деньги из воздуха возьмут Печатать бесконечно не получится рано или поздно что доллар что евро обвалятся как и экономики западных стран Хотя кому я рассказываю, запад уже на пороге аппокалипсиса

[@subz6739]

America with NATO are filled with the most deadliest and most evil people on the planet. America saw how powerful Russia was when Europe was still intact so America came into talks with Russian president Gorbachev to collapse The Soviet Union… America gained access to Europe and came into talks with other countries for instance, England and together create they created NATO. Ukraine became an independent country so America took full advantage of that, giving them false information and leading them to believe that were a horrible country. They began training, and preparing the Ukrainian troops to invade Russia and take what’s left of it on March 6th of 2022. America wants all their land and resources. They want to split Russia into small pieces and distribute the land to every country. Maybe leave Moscow alone and that’s it. Their goal is to advance their nato group, use propaganda, stir things up in people’s ears, and turn the world against us. This way, Everyone supports the NATO and Together take down Russia and wipe us all from the face of the earth. Don’t y’all forget what happened with the Indians, Soon to be American’s were advanced settlers. They had convinced the world that the Indians are murders and terrorists who sever people’s limbs and decapitate poor innocent folks, Together They destroyed India along with thousands of years of Indian history. What used to be India is now called The United States of America. The same exact issue is now happening today. Accusing Russia of countless of wrongful acts like Terrorism, Genocide, Election fraud, and so much more. Accusing the Russian troops of raping and torturing innocent people and dismemberment. In all actuality, Ukraine is the real enemy. All the accusations they have piled up on us is something that they did themselves. Ukraine is killing their own civilians and blowing up occupied houses to then point the finger and say that the Russians did it. Russia is trying to save the civilization from Ukraine’s horrible government.

[@thatonelocalauthority2809]

@@GigiRiveraLanuza are you suggesting the east has done more for Africa? Search up Chinese debt traps.

[@user-ki3ks4fd6i]

"data first" thumbnail shows russian soldier from the batttlefield 4 game under US/Nato flag

[@chrisq2838]

@Data first could you please mention your sources because there were several mistakes i spotted at least about NATO: Total reserve personnel: 1.1 million Tanks: roughly 14,000 Self propelled artillery: 5,040 Towed artillry: 5,495 Fighters: 3,527 Transport: 1,540 Total helicopters: 8,485 Frigates: 135 Corvettes: 56 Submarines: 144 Patrol Vessels: 298 Mine Warfare: 153 There are also several "total" that sum US and NATO( including US) together

[@mnpipi3329]

It is so frustrating when people do not state their source. I think a lot of people just pull numbers out of their ass

[@chrisq2838]

@@mnpipi3329 My source was statista, along with Global firepower

[@Cryptos222]

И складывал, в Excel :))), сколько будет 2+2*2?

[@danielballard3364]

And one more thing.. a comparison of battle ready drones is missing.. drones are key in future war scenarios, even in today's as can be seen in the Russia vs. Ukraine war already.. and then it's not just about the number but about the quality of such drones as well.. this is a hidden factor in which the US is leaps and bounds above everyone, just too little is officially known about the real numbers of the models used and their capabilities..

[@Barrawitzkaa]

what data is that?? Same channel shows complete different "datas" in comparison Russia / Nato. Also a matter of interest, that 12k Tanks is rank 4, 5k, too, and 6k is rank 2. Seems to be reliable. BTW: It all means nothing in the end.

[@codyrileywilliams6342]

Need to count everyone that is or would be on Russia and china side like north Korea Iran and then same thing for the USA and Europe count south Korea Japan Canada I wouldn't count NATO I would count individual countries and spilt it like allies axis

[@Bigboymafaka]

fr 2 vs 32 countrys

[@factssaid3308]

Damn... Russia has a really powerful military, even though its economy is not as good as USA. Really great job. USA power is only in the air. Comparing with land and sea, Russia and China has more advantage. Not to mention that you're measuring the economy of two countries against multiple countries. The results are actually great for Russia. They say Russia is exhausting its power in Ukraine, but seeing those numbers tells another story. Also, NATO and USA are also paying a lot of money and resources for Ukraine, so it's actually both sides are facing the same conditions.

[@user-xx7dq9gt4t]

Армия россии это остатки старого хлама от ссср, которого 80% просто не работает

[@abel_underwater]

“Land” *looks at war in Ukraine* rightttt…🤭😂 I’m Swiss and don’t pick any side, but even I know the US would smoke both Russia/China in Air, Navy, and Army and it’s not even close. Especially the first two….those two separate branches of American military can only beat each other and alone are stronger than entire militaries around the world. Navy would starve out Russia and China, while AF would send both back to the Stone Age in conventional war, then Army/Marines would clean out both Moscow and Beijing. The amount of tech each branch of US military has is mind-boggling, the supplies they’re sending to Ukraine is grinding Russia to a halt, can you imagine if they faced them for real? The stuff they show is so advanced, I can’t even imagine the alien technology they’re hiding.

[@otbcmurda7716]

Are you crazy? USA navy fleet is bigger than Russia’s. Russia only has 1 carrier and it’s out dated asf. China compares better tbh

[@voidwalker9223]

Uh the US has the most powerful and largest navy in the world. Jesus you are not educated in modern warfare are you? US has 11 super carriers and largest and most modern destroyer and cruisers and best subs in the world.

[@technoartfest8708]

@@abel_underwater You mean the NATO armies that lost in Afghanistan and in Syria .. the ones that IRAN bombed US bases in IRAQ? and wounded hundred of soldiers? The one that IRAN stole their best stealth plane and destroyed their most expensive Global hawk drone.. lol that will "smoke China and RUSSIA" in Ukraine? I don't think so.. NATO not only could not win in Syria , they not winning in Ukraine either ,even with all the weapons and intelligence and artillery and training they gave. NATO is already in Ukraine , giving them help with nearly everything NATO have ,including 20,000 nato veterans volunteers and still is losing. There is no way NATO can win a direct full scale war versus Russia , even less China.. Russia have more nukes than All NATO combined.. enough to send to the stone age NATO. and NATO can't intercept hypersonic missiles . lol So none of that tech is going to help you defeat Russia missile forces , superior submarine force and superior hypersonic missiles and more powerful nukes too. . Just one hypersonic missile ,armed with a nuke , would send 100 to 200 warships ,and entire fleet , of NATO to the button of the sea. So NATO will never dare to fight directly ,a fight they know they cant win. Russia and CHina are too strong for even NATO capabilities.

[@kiv8103]

What is the outcome of the confrontation? Did you think about analyzing? Just ashes and solid radiation.

[@minos121]

19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to do battle with the one who rode the horse and with his army.

[@adrianpopescu6837]

i tell only that: china how old is she? usa? how old is she like country? , whats mean usa? peoples from africa, europe, asia? whats mean china? they have history? america has history? thats why america will fall. god bless all peoples not america.end

[@ivanstefko2724]

If its including US", then you shouldnt count it together again lol.

[@SharonKerenTLV]

Did you not include USA numbers in the total on purpose? In many items you put only NATO’s numbers on the total

[@ronanafonso6171]

Ue gente por que nai esta fazendo a soma de alguns quisto do EUA e OTAN ??

[@chiarnustiucenumesaaleg1136]

Why "USA and Nato" if USA is already part of Nato? You mean 2× USAs and the rest of Nato or what?

[@Leeedy_1]

He means USA and *the rest of* Nato

[@chiarnustiucenumesaaleg1136]

@@Leeedy_1 Wasn't enough to say just Nato?