Russia-Ukraine War: Winter Battlefield Poses New Challenges for Ukraine’s Army | WION Fineprint

[@aburakadabura2]

If Chinese troops invaded Indian territory, claimed that this was their historical territory, and remained in the occupied territory, would the Indian media say, "That makes sense!" and approve of China's claim?

[@johnfrancisco1851]

Exactly 💯

[@Blöœdǐêď]

You are babbling non-sense. What you just said is the equivalent of comparing a fact to an opinion.

[@BetterWorld-d4v]

Yes - if the adjacent territory people were ethnic Chinese and the territory had been taken during a period with an asymmetric power configuration... like Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan...?

[@aburakadabura2]

@@BetterWorld-d4v What if that area had been recognized by China 20 years ago as a result of bilateral discussions that “the area is Indian territory”?

[@WangMingGe]

No, because they are hypocrites. They still whine about China giving them a whipping in 1962.

[@robhaythorne4464]

Danny Davis is not famous for truth telling.

[@davidbray2500]

Funny how other independent sources tell the exact opposite.

[@vaskodimoski5690]

Kursk offensive has failed

[@johnfrancisco1851]

You have failed clean your rivers

[@thinkerly1]

Ukrainians are still in Kursk, after five months. Or do you want to lie about that, too?

[@walterbrunswick]

​@johnfrancisco1851 why are you so angry?😢

[@ValimorPutin]

Ukraine can’t win Russia I don’t even know why trying smh

[@walterbrunswick]

They had to convince themselves

[@johnfrancisco1851]

You know nothing alright

[@thinkerly1]

Explain why you said this 2 years and 11 months ago, and why you are saying it after 1047 days.

[@johnfrancisco1851]

Slava Ukraini ❤

[@walterbrunswick]

Where is Slava?

[@garysuplee5092]

Lies.

[@vaskodimoski5690]

No its not Ukraine's 2nd offensive in Kursk has been crushed it was a bigger mistake then the first

[@garysuplee5092]

@vaskodimoski5690 🤡

[@robendert7617]

The whole idea to have worthless agrarian territory to exchange it for something else is a BS story concocted afterwards. The strategic goal of the offensive was to take the Kursk nuclear power plant and a storage facility for tactical nukes. This failed miserably, as the Uki's not even got half way. So they had to come up with an alternative explanation for this miserably failed expedition.

[@hymns4ever197]

Worthless agrarian territory? How much food do you think would be at your grocery store if it were not for agrarian territory?

[@robendert7617]

@@hymns4ever197 Tat's not the point. The point is that a few fields of potatoes and sunflowers has no intrinsic value for the largest country in the world that is a net food exporter. There are no cities, arms factories or whatever of strategic value that the Uki's occupy. That's the point. It is a useless undertaking where they scarified their last reserves for strictly nothing other than Zelenky's pride.

[@thinkerly1]

Your lies do not create reality. Show us some proof of Ukrainian troops "fleeing", not just talk. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[@robendert7617]

According to the Ukraine itself, over 100'000 soldiers went AWOL. The reality is probably worse.

[@amgeneralbuilding]

Run forest run 😂😂

[@Alexander-m1v6q]

This site and all who work on it,,, I bet your families are so ashamed of you.

[@FinetTwo]

A very wrong approach is the issue of decisions from an ideological perspective. And human emotions do not always go hand in hand with reason, most often they do not. Usually it is so that too many civilians die and the benefits are not always adequate to the intended ones. There are many more to mention... Current wars show this. The current war in Israel with the Hamsa, civilian deaths are definitely above the norm and on both sides. USA - Afghanistan in 2001, Stalin murdered his command and then was unable to effectively fight German soldiers. Or of course the current Russian-Ukrainian war. The effect will be the same as always, losses in many dimensions will be above the norm. To be more precise, if this war had not happened, they would have come out better. But often people are like that, first a seemingly reasonable decision and when push comes to shove, it would be better if this war had not happened at all. The Kremlin has made a decision about this war, but the effect will be different from the intended one, after this war, as it is estimated, the crises in the Russian Federation will be as big as several times harder than 1991 in Russia. A021

[@venkatsantoshd]

😂😂😂😂

[@GeraldWillier-u5z]

Haaaa haaaaa that's funny

[@zoranmrdjenovic8127]

Ukrajina⚰🤣

[@solomontesfaye4876]

IEEE’s really

[@Thewhippedhippie]

Message from Texas! 31 degrees Napkin note: true freedom is being thankful for what’s right in front of you. Dictators can’t pull the soul freedom from within each of us. Our environment is our own responsibility. Note: men tend to marry and move to privacy. Environmental mental responsibility has to be used by each man. If not: below follows. Zelenskyy and NATO, both use each other. Zelenskyy cries for freedom that doesn’t exist anymore. NATO comes in with back pats. Defense sector gains. 💰 society is still living the social lie of betterment. 👁️ Zelenskyy where is the betterment and accomplishments. Women and children are terrified as a result of you listening to your friends NATO. NATO the peace keepers or defense sector leader? By killing your youth, your society will have a gap. What comfort could have come from that gap, we have lost due to the mega educated?

[@gary-im1ov]

Ukraine stoped wanting to be part of NATO in 2010 that do not change until after Russia invaded and took Crimea so Ukraine realized that staying neutral did not stop Russia from invading Ukraine Amnesty international investigated places where Russia said there were mass graves and found none.

[@thinkerly1]

Ivan, you invaded Ukraine "in self defence", yet you had (and have) 6000 nukes. Explain how anyone could threaten you.

[@alfredneuman6911]

Yes. Irredentism

[@FinetDeux]

A very wrong approach is the issue of decisions from an ideological perspective. And human emotions do not always go hand in hand with reason, most often they do not. Usually it is so that too many civilians die and the benefits are not always adequate to the intended ones. There are many more to list... Current wars show this. The current war between Israel and Hamas, civilian deaths are definitely above the norm and on both sides. USA - Afghanistan in 2001, Stalin murdered his command and then was unable to effectively fight German soldiers. Or of course the current Russian-Ukrainian war. The effect will be the same as always, losses in many dimensions will be above the norm. To be more precise, if this war had not happened, they would have come out better. But often people are like that, at first it seems like a reasonable decision and when push comes to shove, it would be better if this war had not happened at all. The Kremlin has made a decision about this war, but the effect will be different from the intended one, after this war, as it is estimated, the crises in the Russian Federation will be as big as several times harder than 1991 in Russia. AB020