Russia VS NATO

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

Hello Everyone, I'd like to announce that now it is possible to subscribe to this channel for a small ammount, supporting the DBS statistics mission to cover all the possible combinations between economic country comparisons and hopefully much more that in the future. As the earnings of this channel are less than 50$ a month, your contribution can really make a difference. By clicking on any video and then on the subscribe button, you will see all the advantages of such subscribtion. I wish everyone a wonderful day, Thank you for the attention :)

[@syedahmed6338]

Have you even looked at your like and dislike and comments section on this video?

[@duxd1452]

Right, the NATO Alliance falls apart and Russia suddenly gets support from half the planet. Not a vey realistic scenario...

[@ComradeRussia777]

Very realistic

[@duxd1452]

@@ComradeRussia777 You probably don't realize this because of all the propaganda you've been fed by your government, but Russia is actually one of the most despised countries in the world. That's why the only countries that ever side with Russia are states like Syria, Venezuela or Iran. Allmost all of Russia's former "allies"(read: vassal states) joined the NATO alliance as soon as they had the chance.

[@devinhigoy221]

@@duxd1452 I was very confused when everyone decided to join Russia, like what were they going to gain? I mean I understand China joining the war, but why the hell would NATO allies join Russia and China.

[@300spartan2222]

@@ComradeRussia777 xD how is the realism now ?

[@Slasshi]

@@ComradeRussia777 very realistic right :D ? hahah how is the war going in Ukraine ?

[@alnoso]

"France surrenders" as usual

[@gerryreggea]

😂😂

[@eddykhan6672]

hahah.. just good at kissing

[@lrballistics]

Hey, you gotta give them credit for not surrendering when a russian teen ran in their borders with a .22

[@gerryreggea]

Fabrice...vous étés Française..relax man..we know French people love peace.

[@cotefabrice1801]

and we like killing, and we are good at it. im a real psychopath so careful

[@that1worldcitizen152]

Yeah I have no idea how on earth Russia was able to advance through Ukraine this fast

[@RonanPangrazzi]

This is not NATO vs Russia, this is The US vs The Warsaw Pact

[@thefumyandthechev]

@@BMANeverDies revolt

[@moelester9770]

@@BMANeverDies lmao. Because Russia took those small countries?

[@boko1564]

Basically no one wins in the end cause everyone died from Nukes.

[@skl4189]

Romus no they weren't China and Russia barely had any troops left

[@skl4189]

And the us still had their and canvas military

[@breal36w]

An Invasion on US soil without a surprise Nuke attack first will not happen. they wont even get on shore even with Russia,china and India pushing the offensive.

[@Lomnjac007]

Oliver Adkinson Oh really, NORAD, and which AA system is that? You have that CRAP Patriot, for which your own experts say is CRAP, for which Israelis said it was CRAP as it downed 1 of the 42 SCUD's (and that is ancient compared to, say, Iskander M) and it would NOT stop more then 11% of nukes fired... You keep forgeting that it's RUSSIA that leads the world in rocket power, speed, manouverability and not to mention AA systems, they have the worlds ONLY dedicated anti-nuke system in existance, System A-135!!

[@Lomnjac007]

Oliver Adkinson Well MORON for one you are the one giving yourself thumbs up 20s after posting, two you're the one IDIOT claiming that this would stop their nuclear attack, and third FUCKTARD, if you lay your hopes on CANADA to help save you, which has a tiny professional useless army then good luck with that, they wouldn't last more then a month.

[@Aboleo80]

Russia declares war. Finland says "nyet, Ivan!" and Russia surrenders is more realistic scenario than this lunacy..

[@Lomnjac007]

Aboleo80 It is more realistic that you are writing from a mental institution than that bullshit you wrote...

[@gabrielm.942]

Lomj get your head out of your ass just because you hate America doesn't mean Russia would win. We could probably honestly take on every nation outside continental Americas and still stand a fair chance of winning.

[@tooold8549]

Life lesson: move to South America to avoid being nuked.

[@chaosXP3RT]

Entertaining, but this depends on a lot of countries joining Russia and a lot of countries leaving NATO. I feel like if a Russia vs USA war ever happened, almost no countries would join Russia and almost every country would leave NATO. No country wants to risk getting obliterated by Russia or the USA.

[@mcdresab]

yeep...

[@fedjadrndarski5606]

Agree!

[@LiterallyWho1917]

chaosXP3RT i doubt the uk would surrender so easily. What are they gonna do? Invade a country that hasn't been successfully conquered since the 9th century?

[@chaosXP3RT]

I'm saying that if the U.S. got attacked by Russia, every country would leave NATO instead of honoring their pact to defend the U.S. because nobody would want to get nuked by Russia. I never said anything about surrender

[@Balnazzardi]

the reason the war is not gonna happen in the first place are the nukes....neither Russia or any of the Nato countries are willing to take that risk....as long M.A.D. is assured, any kind of full military invasion would be like playing with fire, cause things could escalate very quickly. Its just a shame that we are still not away from Cold War politics, but are in fact returning back to it...and Russia, Putin and their supporters should also look into the mirror and ask themselves are they really the victims here, or are they just fueling the negative progress? Russia and Putin are so hypocrite saying "dont meddle with other nations" when they are doing exactly that in Ukraine and in Syria.

[@aristeidislykas7163]

Turkey remaining in NATO and fighting Russia is improbable. India sending troops to Hawaii? India could not fight along chinese troops. More likely to invade Israel through a devastated Saudi Arabia. You did not mention the role of Pakistan.

[@GameXTwo]

[Sarkasm: ON] Wow, france surrenders.Very big suprise

[@Tachicoma2010]

Guys as Russian, I assure you, you overestimate our army. Yes, it isn't weak by Europe standards, but in that kind of war, we have no chance. Defeat will take weeks, if we're lucky - months. Taking into consideration the poor state of our military-industrial complex, we can not even compete with the US 1 vs 1. Understand that Russia is not the Soviet Union, we are left with only a faint shadow of the former power we had in the 60s and 70s. If you remove the show-off parades on May 9 in Moscow and propoganda, you will see that the real strength approximately at level of India.

[@darnit1944]

Damn, its been 5 years and your comment is still spot on.

[@abbynguyen5923]

Wisest Russian seer

[@sirpagandetyptoft6793]

Luxembourg will have the final say in any war

[@Kouhiko9674]

I love how in every one of these simulations on youtube America just sits out until they are half taken over.

[@hellgates_javed6451]

America has a weird habit of sending weapons not joining only after evrything became worse

[@titanguy9992]

Texas would never surrender nor would any state we are the United States of America we would all fight to the end

[@UpstreamSwimmer]

titan guy99 Texas has done their part voting for the right person so that there won't be this war any time soon. And nobody would invade nobody, it's almost impossible and needless to do so.

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

I'm sorry. I had to reupload it. There were some mistakes

[@TheTrollAsshole]

make china vs vietnam, philipine and japan

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+Juju Bubu ok

[@TheTrollAsshole]

De Bellorum Simulationibus ty

[@TheTrollAsshole]

De Bellorum Simulationibus all the countries in south east asian that have border conflict with china

[@Kris-ne3ik]

Its true, India would never fight alongside China, this country is despised by most its neighboring countries, hell even some of its own citizens hate their government for its authoritarian regime. However, India would prefer to align with russia rather than USA ( Alliance with/help from Russia in the past) . Therefore, in my opinion it would be a non aligned country. Pakistan however would definitely be involved in this war and would support China. And, I am pretty sure it would attack Indian border cities going by its track record, in the process calling for Chinese help. India will then have to step into this bloody mess siding with USA .

[@austinbidi9621]

idk.... india is ok with us and dislikes china so i think they would be neutral, india would not support a war which would in the end help china. also usa dose nothing till the end and mexico would not side with Russia, us mexico relations are in a stable state. plus USA, Japan, south Korea and other countries can hold off china in naval combat which would happen and north korea is super behind in military. This war simulation is in heavy Russian favor. just my to sense.

[@okemosniper]

exactly what i was thinking. also, the only advantage russia really has is more tanks when it comes to the materialistic side. america has more planes, troops and allies. not to mention more powerful allies. also, america has set up a very powerful anti nuclear weapons array around all of europe, northamerica and south east asia. russia wouldnt really stand a chance in my opinion. i also think that china wouldnt help russia. as you said, america has a better navy and can take the south china sea like it were nothing. including south korean and Japanese support, china hasnt a chance

[@kylesugui]

I thought so too I think NATO and US was underestimated a little bit too much here, NATO is already surrounding Russia plus US have like 800+ military bases around the world. With China it's possible that they can invade south Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, and the Philippines, but at a very costly invasion. They know if SEA + Australia + Japan +SoKor + US navy (and possibly india too) worked together their navy could easily break from a single mistake. Russian navy would be too busy dealing with Europe and Alaska to really help. Probably one of the few reasons why they're so insistent on building and fortifying artificial islands near Philippines because it's such a strategic position.

[@fedjadrndarski5606]

I think that NATO will decay before some states get nuke. No one wants to be nuked. NATO doesn't surrounds Russia, it is only close to their European part, but never forget that the surface of Russia is bigger than surface of Pluto. It's very hard to be surrounded. On the other side, I doubt that anyone would be close to US borders with conventional troops. So, acquiring Hawaii is so funny. Before that, US should face new civil war.

[@karakas9905]

Black Jack but Russia is surrounded... Russia is right between Europe, Asia and America.

[@fedjadrndarski5606]

Karakas Surrounded by who ? Situation isn't so black-white.

[@kumaran4845]

I am big fan of you. I like this video. can you make one on European war ( every European nations fight with each other)?

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+SGT. JUSTIN ok

[@ivangeorgiev8787]

and in 2022 we have completely different scenario

[@shivammarkan5630]

Thanks for doing my idea bro!

[@MagnateOrator]

ok so this was the most unrealistic scenario ever lol.

[@TheOneRealTom]

That video didn't age well ;)

[@JohnDoe-zy6tm]

somewhere around 1 min into this senario every city on the planet is nuked and the fallout kills everyone else... game over.

[@JohnDoe-zy6tm]

Charles Curt no my friend. even if Russia didn't fire one missile back. Us nuking all of Russia would irradiate the whole northern hemisphere and kill us all... and our missile defence shield is only designed to stop a small attack from a low tech country like an Iran or n Korea. Russia China and the US use MERV missiles with decoys. No chance of stopping a mass attack of those. All three also use SBL missiles that attack from very low trajectory's right off the coast and have almost no chance of being intercepted... an all out nuclear war is the end for all of us... there is no winner.

[@Lomnjac007]

Charles Curt Hahahaaaa, MORON how did you calculate that 100% of old US nukes would pass thru Russian S-400, S-500, and System A-135, and that only few would pass your CRAP that you call Patriot antimissile shield??? Even your own experts say that your chances of stoping Topol M's are rated at 68% and Bulava's at 89% MISSED!!! That means at least 80% will go thru, and they have more then you do, and theirs are top notch tech!!

[@JohnDoe-zy6tm]

Lomnjac007 all moot points... no missile defence can stop a Merv attack. they can't stop a upper atmosphere blast that will blanket both country's in EMP. They can't stop the radioactive fallout that will spread across the northern hemisphere... we all die.

[@Lomnjac007]

John Doe You seriously need to learn what is the range of a nuclear blast, yealds, EMP radius, before embarasing yourself like this!!!

[@JohnDoe-zy6tm]

Lomnjac007 your a fool if you think for a moment that Russia would survive a nuclear war any more then the US would... spit out that RT coolaid... every population center every military base every bunker every airport every factory your farmlands your navy all get carpet nuked...

[@ventezcamilo]

Italy leaves nato? really?

[@singgiridhsaggelos2033]

christian ventez abadia even now they want to leave EU and NATO like Turkey want leave NATO

[@TheColombianSpartan]

christian ventez abadia Germany is neutral?? HOW?!

[@olluman123]

merkel. just merkel

[@nubitynub1757]

No one WANTS to leave NATO, NATO is literally keeping them protected and funded, stop making up these ridiculous claims

[@theenderexpress1298]

I know you said no politics involved, but what about the Economy?? China couldn't last more than a year (or less) before falling into massive depression if they were not exporting stuff to the USA. Germany and Italy wouldn't leave NATO without a fight. Indians HATE the chinese and would probably try to avoid fighting side by side with them. The west coast of the USA fell to the Russians way to fast, the middle of the country is more likely to fall before the coasts do. Also Japan was soooo helpful. We really needed those 3 islands they conquered! Anyways sorry for my ranting lol

[@Ruperdepuup]

Hahaha! Yeah right, practically all the NATO allies defect, and even TEXAS leaves the alliance. All the while the USA is doing NOTHING to prevent the Russian advance in Europe. While extremely unrealistic, the video was highly entertaining! :-)

[@danielegerlando8996]

Sweden VS Norway

[@edvin182]

sweden and norway vs denmark

[@nicojw314]

sweden ,norway and denmark vs refugees

[@maceproductions9587]

Norway and Denmark vs Sweden could be more fun

[@edvin182]

WDLC1911 Your plan has a problem. Everyone is brainwashed to love the immigrants so if you throw them out you would be seen as hitler.

[@Merecir]

Sweden wins by default. As it actually got a decent air force.

[@russianazista]

Italy leaves NATO due to good commerce with russia (1% of commerce with russia- half a billion with The West).

[@DaddyCaldwell]

It's a shame you have to add these disclaimers because people have soft skin

[@andrews3545]

Why would china risk losing its best consumer (US and the west)

[@mdidris4414]

Hamza ML522 Akhi I don't want to be in the middle of these kuffars WW111 as I would probably get conscripted into the British Army. Think I need to start making plans to move to Medina in shaa'Allah.

[@TheColombianSpartan]

Dan Idris Yeah,i am coming too

[@GamingWithAle]

Ahahahhaha if you think it XD

[@catm4403]

you're clueless.. and you're pseudo god's a fraud.

[@nubitynub1757]

They can't even fuel their army for more than half a year without America's oil

[@gobberz3228]

Iran would obviously side with Russia, Iraq is quite possible because of its own issues and to avoid open conflict with Iran. India might also side with Russia or, remain neutral because it has Pakistan on one side and China on the other. China is the country that might tip the balance - they may not get involved in direct conflict with the US however because of the resources is gains from Russia an alliance is likely (although China could equally invade and take the oil and gas fields in Siberia) however, they are likely to jump on Taiwan, and are likely to then enter into conflict with the US and, definitely Japan. As for Europe, I'm not sure Germany would drop out so easily, this would depend on Germany's economic situation at the time - it has a well funded military that whilst not as large as the Russian military, coupled with British, American (and yes, French) support, could possibly hold Russia and the German-Polish border. The Middle East and, Balkan states would then determine the way the war goes as I suspect most middle eastern states except Oman, Saudi Arabia possibly Jordan and Israel would side with NATO. North Africa would likely side with Russia but countries like Kenya and South Africa may side with NATO or, remain neutral. As for Australia, it will side with NATO but mostly, it would protect its borders and would stay away from Chinese waters (it could help block the Panama Canal and the area between South America and Antarctica). As for invasion of Alaska - it's a possibility but the US and Canada would be stupid not to atleast reinforce it with troops and air support. Finally, while many Scandinavian countries would remain as neutral as they could, Britain, along with the France, US and Germant could cut off Russian access to the North Sea and then the Atlantic and, Britain, France, Spain, Italy and Us could cut off its access to the Med. Plus, I think Argentina may try to seize the Faulkland Islands while Britain is distracted (however I wonder how likely other South American countries would side with NATO and attack Argentina or, a joint attacking force from the US the UK, and possibly maybe some Canadian forces to regain the Islands). As for Mexico and Cuba, well Mexico may try to take some of its former lands back - Texas is doubtful (as it has an independence streak that goes way back to 1846 if not before, which, I also think of Texas seceded and Russia etc invaded mainland US via Alaska then, I could see Russia et al winning and, Mexico gaining territory such as California and New Mexico). It's all purely theoretical - some smaller nations may not have a large effect overall though which way they go could make it easier for either side to fight more efficiently.

[@user-jk1gb7wm6z]

If uploader has given chance to scandinavia to be neutral then why he/she has not given chance to India to be as NEUTRAL ... India is in demand .....Both NATO and Russia want it to stay their side .... But India has no mood to choose anyone ... Just like India choose in 1947 to stay neutral ... We want peace bro ..... Plus, What is USA doing in this War scenario .... Watching TV only...??

[@wizdalmar7559]

when America sided with Pakistan Thatz the time u will join the war

[@0ji.a]

Wiz Dalmar Joining the Russians just because Pakistan joined the US has nothing to do with this... They wouldn't gain anything other than a war between them and Pakistan. Yes the two countries hate each other because of land disputes, but I seriously doubt that'd make them join the opposite side. So stop guessing random shit and instead guess random shit and back it up.

[@FLJBeliever1776]

Other problems in this simulation are... Well... For something not meant to be realistic, it definitely is the work of fancy. Both India and China lack the amphibious capability to reach Hawaii and invade it. Additionally, Russian paratroopers would not secure Alaska easily. There is a highway, purposely built, to move large numbers of US troops to Alaska. Canada would already be in the war, the same with Australia and large numbers of other Dominion members. Most notably, is your timeline. No war could be fought on such a scale with the available on hand forces. You also overpower the Russian and Chinese Communist Forces. Most of their equipment is quite dated and obsolete. Troop training is also far poorer than in the West. Additionally, with India actually on the side of NATO (all caps by the way), the rough estimates would favor NATO in terms of population. The USA alone has almost triple the population of Russia. NATO's large numbers also contribute another Billion people. NATO allies in Asia would also add an addition half billion to billion. India alone rivals China in population. That said, even with close allies and client states, the East would be badly outnumbered. At least a population ratio of 3:1 upwards of 4:1. The bulk of Western forces would be highly trained full time professional soldiers, well trained reservists, and a large pool of former soldiers that can be recalled. The US National Guard also adds to America's might with strength nearly that of the Regular Forces, plus the US Reserve should be factored in as well. Tech differences and supply also comes into play. The PLA and RGF both are vehicle heavy and more focused on firepower. The trade off is a weaker supply and logistical support. Additionally, the RGF alone is plagued by at least 30% of its troops being harden criminals pressed into military service as part of their punishment. Unfortunately for everyone, not just the RGF, this means they use their criminal skills to steal and sell on the black market. These criminals are also bold enough, that they are known to kill conscripts and volunteers, including officers, who try and get in their way or restore discipline among the ranks. PLA soldiers are more oriented towards party doctrine and have less training than even RFF. Additionally, the RFF can at least enjoy some capable commanders, promoted on merit. The PLA senior staff is largely Party Officials in uniform and promotion at lower ranks includes how well a prospective officer for promotion recalls his Communist Education. Overall, the West may be a mix bag, but comparatively speaking, the East is a wet bag with a hole in the bottom of it.

[@EvoSwatch]

1:51 "Scandinavia sings a peace treatment", you got me right there

[@cristianoancea8959]

please make romania vs hungary or romania vs bulgary!!!!

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+Oancea Cristian da , dar prima pune like la asta :)

[@cristianoancea8959]

+De Bellorum Simulationibus esti roman? pe cuvant de stiam asta :)))

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+Oancea Cristian da

[@cristianoancea8959]

+De Bellorum Simulationibus bravo tie ma baiatule, nu am stiut ca esti roman. Sa faci te rog macar un videoclip cu romania. Chiar daca e vai de ea si isi ia bataie, dar macar sa fie acolo. Oricum simulatorul asta chiar simuleaza o lupta adevarata, intre tancuri sau avioane sau doar asa intre tari?

[@UpstreamSwimmer]

Oancea Cristian You should have stayed out of nato and the eu, the didn't bring anything to Romania. Anyways, I'm sure you will be welcome in some future Slavic alliance.

[@goodchild2215]

Name of the music please? 😀

[@kratos952]

This video is literally : Russia + China + India vs The world

[@somerandomguy7458]

You severely underestimate the USA and overestimate Russian power.

[@darnit1944]

Now that the real war has started, you are very correct. Russia is very very overestimated.

[@изяшниперсон-у5й]

Napoleon (first EU) 1812 -- russian in Paris Hitler (second EU) 1945 -- russian in Berlin Obammy (third EU) 2017..? -- Ready to die?

[@Ryysight]

UK: THERE IS A MISSILE HEADING FOR PRIMARK, WE MUST STOP THIS WAR

[@3migsu]

So Siberia is better protected than Moscow?? lol

[@singgiridhsaggelos2033]

MigSu pue ram the most of Anti nucklear systems & missiles are in Siberia

[@singgiridhsaggelos2033]

MigSu pue ram and all of those is Russian systems cuz we all Russians know the first target for nuclear hit will go in Moscow-Kremlin

[@3migsu]

Singgiridhs Aggelos exactly, so Moscow have to be the most protected city in the eh country, is the main one. come on.

[@singgiridhsaggelos2033]

MigSu pue ram it's true but the enemy systems from NATO - USA is on the Moscow and Kremlin like I said so the other 2 very good defence systems is on the Voronezh - Siberia Moscow is just 40% it's protected but we are carefully cuz it's not so easy to protect yourself from so many nucklear heads just with full of power defence in one city like Moscow

[@3migsu]

Singgiridhs Aggelos ok, i understand you, and i also think will be very proteted lol and more now with those new systems S300,400,500 you know regards

[@rishabh719]

what is the name of music 🤗

[@christophergonzales534]

Egypt would never take the side of Russia its a major non NATO ally

[@lucgonzo]

Andorra vs France XD ( or Andorra-spain vs France :p )

[@josephstalin8975]

Andorra could beat france judging by WW2

[@ksby4013]

yep unless andorra wouldn't make a silly mistake they would beat france absolutly.

[@TheCubeman12]

...

[@milanmancic3932]

VERY REAL SIMULATION!!!!

[@donovanmancle8283]

Noo us would do something about it if russia invaded them like that they are allies of nata

[@donovanmancle8283]

And us would crush down russia so it's unrealistic

[@НовакМорача]

How you play this scenario in atWar?

[@kenllacer]

Iceland shall inherit the Earth!

[@matthewwaddington2777]

Here's the thing guys. A conventional war cannot be fought today in the same way as it was during WW2, weapons, personnel, & logistic facilities are far to expensive to deploy on that level again (no country in europe has the money or industrial capacity to do this). You cannot take a graduate out of college & conscript him into a modern airforce with 6 weeks basic training, and than expect him to operate a modern military combat aircraft (they are too complex), & the same applies to 90% of modern conventional weapons. If WW3 broke out tomorrow it would be nuclear, & no-one would win. The above plays out like a Michael Bay wet-dream of a Red Dawn remake.

[@paulastles3116]

My main problem with this is it has China and India allied, in real life they are actually hostile with occasional border skirmishes. One must also account for the Pakistan-India tensions which would either keep both out or cause nuclear war between them.

[@henry2245]

India would most likely stay out of the war or side with NATO and what was the USA dewing up till mid April

[@assafgoldlust140]

same with israel i dubt they have any true join the war. they got enough problem as it is

[@duxd1452]

Nato was build for this very purpose, so I highly doubt that. NATO forces are so integrated that it would leave leaving armies weakened at the most crucial time. Turkey for example would lose over 40% of their radar data just when the missiles start flying. Completely unrealistic. You also underestimate inter-alliance and European-Atlantic loyalty.

[@ferdinandcrespo6012]

Texas and Germany declare neutrality? Hahahaha great joke!

[@riphaven]

show of hands, who here was surprised france surrendered?

[@yahiko8098]

No one. Isn't that what they're known for?

[@guillermozepeda9967]

Actually, no; and without them there would be no U.S.A.. But don't worry, we'll soon be catapulted together back to Mexico over Trump's wall.

[@EvoSwatch]

from the video you could tell there are only 3 Countries who launch the nuke, Israel, US, Iran, pretty realistic but Iran doesn't have any nuclear weapons

[@Faddaaa]

World War 3, or just plain war with Russia doesn't seem likely, many of us understand that nuclear war wouldn't just destroy the enemy, but humanity, and Earth It's self.

[@anilsener2688]

More than 700 years old Turkey surrenders to Persia on 17th of December and Saudi Arabia stays up until. So unrealistic.

[@jackmark3471]

I am egyption and i dont think my country will work like that becouse egypt wont help in war with russia nether us we are not up for the losses we have terriost going against us

[@radoslav7814]

Any conclusions? Go to New Zeland, the safest place in the world when 3WW starts xd

[@WeSRT4]

The US is far more powerful than the Chinese and Russians. It's really no contest to be quite honest. The advantage in naval power alone makes this scenario impossible.

[@perfectlybalancedasallthin9319]

+Vote for Mr Cat Moron, the statistics itself prove that US is better than Russia and China in terms of military. Of course USA wouldn't be able to invade Russia or China and "conquer" them, but they could certainly keep on the pressure/offensive and force their enemy to always be on the defensive. If either Russia or China (Or even combined) tries to attack the US mainland, they'd get destroyed since their navy isn't really that powerful, and they wouldn't be able to keep up the pressure/offensive since they lack the sufficient assets to do so (Like aircraft carriers).

[@perfectlybalancedasallthin9319]

+Vote for Mr Cat Aww, little kid can't find a good retort to my reply so he gives up, how sweet :)

[@WeSRT4]

Vote for Mr Cat You're a moron. The US is unrivaled in air and naval power. It's not even remotely close. The US Navy has more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world combined.

[@gabrielm.942]

Claims that in reality America would die but has no evidence to support the factor. Mm mm well you know nothing of how modern war works if you can control the sea and the sky than controlling the land isn't going to help specially when most your cities are coastal ones

[@perfectlybalancedasallthin9319]

***** Yet, you actually are. In almost any battlefield, US would beat Russia, not only because it has better equipment/weapons etc... but also because it has FAR superior logistics, of which is an extremely important factor of any battle/war. Now, shush, shush, you fat sack of rotten potatoes.

[@christopherhenderson1123]

The U.S. would order an Alaskan evacuation as the state is VERY sparsely populated. The U.S. would then deploy all 19 aircraft carriers in the Pacific, launching the largest airstrike in history, obliterating the Alaskan landscape as well as the advancing troops. If Russia and China's troops manage to somehow survive and make it to mainland U.S., it would result in a stalemate. Also, I'm not sure if the Germany or the U.K. would surrender that easily. Also, China would go broke because it has declared war on its only market, Russia would go broke because it's already broke, but the U.S. would not because we don't rely on exports and could simply bump up the taxes to 90%. Doing this would cover our debt and pay for the war at the same time. We have some of the lowest taxes (only 39% for the top 1%), yet we have the largest military by far, so imagine if we increase the taxes from 39% to 90%. Our military would over double in power.

[@TheBalvonas]

You got me at "Ukraine invade Dnepropetrovsk" :D It's like NATO invade USA :D By the way, if you wish to simulate anything, do it on facts and numbers

[@danialrajabpour380]

+ De Bellorum Simulationibus Iran and Russia are allies, why has Russia federation occupied Iran as it shows on the map I find it strange, could you please explain it? or is it just different colors that shows the "good & bad guys" ?

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+Danial Rajabpour red stays for russian allies; blue for american ones and light blue for ukraine

[@danialrajabpour380]

De Bellorum Simulationibus ohh now I get it thx bruv !

[@goodchild2215]

De Bellorum Simulationibus what the name of music, its very interesting

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

look in the description

[@stranger0152]

Man. Can you do Turkey and Russia vs Europe. If you say why is Turkey side With Russia, I will say Turkey dont like Nato anymore. Turkey hate USA because of the coup.

[@Akillesursinne]

You love Turkey because of their corrupt leader? Because their laws are getting less free? Is there anything about the turkish government to really love?

[@Akillesursinne]

Nick Savin What does that have to do with anything? Since it is the official Turkey that the rest of the world have to deal with to a greater extent than the individuals I think it is a worrying trend that Turkey is becoming more religiously ruled and less secular and is moving towards the state of regime than a state of freedome for it's people. The futurue looks dark for Turkey.

[@stranger0152]

Future is great for Turkey. I believe it. I dont like Erdogan and his party but I believe good days will come. Nato will be crushed. When 2010 I used to believe one thing will be happen and Turkey won't want to stay with Nato anymore. Other peoples said "You are idiot. How can Turkey leave Nato ?" Today this coup defeated and Turkey dislike the USA. And in the future Turkey will be Russia's ally. Good days will be come in Turkey.

[@Akillesursinne]

Rey Mysterio How does it usually go for Russias friends? And without free speech, and with Erdagon throwing people in jail, how will Turkey evey become a good country?

[@JurzGarz]

The U.S. had nothing to do with the coup.

[@XDplayerDX]

Why does Russia use nukes, and nobody else does? The US has nukes, the U.K. has nukes, France has nukes, Turkey has nukes, and India has nukes. Doesn't seem fully accurate in my opinion.

[@vaskopopstojanov]

this is the end ! my only friend ...the end

[@incompetence10881]

Their were a lot that I didn't really agree with but I don't think Russia would ever be that dumb to attack NATO

[@tedlancaster9233]

Opens up with a tactical nuke right off the bat I call hax

[@maximusinvictus8802]

I think it would be somewhat more difficult to get Turkey to surrender..... as it has one fo the strongest military forces in the world.

[@НиколаЛопичић]

if there were no nukes this would be intresting

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+jhonnyx13gaming going to remake without nukes

[@jasons8276]

There's always these scenarios that attribute too much magic to explain how something happens. Movies are guilty of this so much. I don't think theater capabilities every seriously enter someone's mind when writing up a scenario, whether it's NATO invading Russia or Russia invading NATO.

[@Narstak]

Even if Russia successfully wages a war this way, the casualities would be heavy as f***. But I almost felt like Germany and italian neutrality look kind of strategic: a buffer zone.

[@spartanleinadp01]

Mexico be like "what the fuck did just happen!"

[@anavultus1142]

I think that such a war is much more likely to rise from conflicting interests in the Middle East rather than Ukraine.

[@darnit1944]

How about now?

[@anavultus1142]

@@darnit1944 While the USA is giving large amounts of aid to Ukraine, it also has made it very clear that it is not interested in actually joining the fight. The situation has changed significantly in the last five years, but Ukraine is still not important enough for the United States and NATO to expand the conflict. While Putin likes to apply pressure with threats, he actually does not want to fight NATO because he knows that he would not win; therefore, an increase in provocations would have to depend on NATO's initiative. The problem with this is that such a war would be extremely unpopular in some NATO countries, especially the United States in which there is a strong push for American (and, by extension, NATO) neutrality from the base of the Republican Party premised on the exhaustion from recent unproductive foreign wars, an unwillingness toward escalation, a reaction against Neoliberal interventionism, and the lack of a security treaty between the USA and Ukraine; therefore, if the Republicans take power in the upcoming election (which is highly likely), they will likely promote de-escalation if they are inclined to the popular base of their party, and NATO is unlikely to commit to a fight without American involvement. A much more likely cause for Americans going to war is Taiwan which is actually strategically important to the USA, unlike Ukraine. Current escalation from a conflict in the Middle East is less likely for the same reasons. Of course, all of this can change quite easily. If a country really wants to go to war with another country, it's not hard to find excuses to do so.

[@300spartan2222]

Ahahahahaaha simulation failed... Real workd kick in and russia cant beat ukraine ^^

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

Luckily

[@tubeseek41]

A 2-4 weeks timeline would be more realistic ! (we talk about nukes, not waterguns!)

[@FLJBeliever1776]

I can already see one problem with your theory here: India. India and the People's Republic of China are at odds with each other. They have a major long running border dispute. Supposedly, PLA troops 'invade' India every so often, entering one Indian territory and then leaving shortly thereafter. Plus, India blames the PRC for backing and supplying Indian Communists that are waging a long running guerrilla conflict in India that has caused hundreds of deaths. In addition, Pakistan is a major receiver of PRC weapons and a primary antagonist against India. Second problem: Egypt. Egypt is now heavily backed by the West and sees Iran as a potential rival. Recently, the two French Assault Ships that were to go to Russia were bought by Egypt and will likely improve the nation's amphibious capabilities, to say nothing of giving the nation what amounts to two Light Carriers. Most of the Egyptian Military's weapons are European or America now, so any parts and resupply would have to come from the West. Additionally ties between Russia and Egypt have been hit or miss since the of the October War.

[@orhblin]

When we made a prediction for ww1.... we summed it up in one phrase (it will end by christmas) to even try and predict an outcome such as this? It's frankly impossible. Out understanding of modern warfare is not up to date with the technology we posses. Drones, tactical missiles, advanced armor and much more is untested in a scenario of total war. like in world war 2, the economy would change drastically. changing the political landscape. Who the aggressor is and how that affect the neutral parties is also a huge factor. Does this drag out? is nuclear weapons used or sanctioned? Does it drag out, is it short? we can know none of this for certain. That is why many people are DESPERATE for peace.

[@ashleyradwell709]

I just hope this war can be prevented this world has seen enough war, if this goes on humanity will not survive..

[@jerrodvolkov5894]

the US government would do that in real life.

[@lenini056]

If Russia wins, the world is enslaved for good. You guys are not good role models for human rights.

[@jerrodvolkov5894]

you obviously don't know what you are talking about. proof of point the country Georgia and south Ossetia.

[@jerrodvolkov5894]

Georgians started it, massacring women and children in their homes. They got a quarter of what they deserve. You know nothing.

[@lenini056]

Krukov Volkov know nothing? Well Russia in the history of their country even as the "Soviet Union" never bothered to participate in UN peacekeeping missions. Where were they Bosnia, Africa, Middle East or elsewhere?

[@jerrodvolkov5894]

Lenin Luna exactly you know nothing. Russia and the USSR are two different beings. it's like comparing a old man to a new born child. Second Russian peacekeepers where defending South Ossetia from Georgian Nazis before Russia was forced to take action. They where and are present in Syria. And these are only a few examples. So again do your research.

[@zypzcoocie]

You forget that the american military-budget is like 3 times larger the size of the chineese and the russian combined. Not even counting the rest of nato.

[@zypzcoocie]

+Hamza ML522 Problem is, the US does what they want, If they don't want to pay their depts, none can force them to. And the war-industry that would kick off in the United states in the event of world war 3, would really raise their economy. Kind of how it happened during ww2 when so many Jobs where created leading to an economic boom, despite fighting the largest war that has ever been fought. But the outcome of ww3 is not that easy to answer, It depends on so many factors, like in what extrents nukes would be used for example. And you can forget that i become religios, if youre even serious about that. Its just mindcontrol and for weakly minded people.

[@Zydia]

11/10 So acurate that it predicted clinton to be president.

[@activistcalel4633]

There whould be like no war just nukes

[@rubeapplemac6130]

If wars were won on treaties and promises alone, this might hold some truth. However victory lies in experience (The USA has been at war in the middle East for the past few decades), budget (USA spends less on defense budget than Russia according to percents and manages to have 10x the defense budget), technology (The US alone has more air craft carriers, with better, more advanced aircraft, than any of the nations that would ally with Russia in this video COMBINED), and economy (We could easily cut off trade with China and leave them to wilt and die). So if you don't want to consider any of the above factors, then this might be realistic. However in the real world Russia would have absolutely no way of defeating the USA.

[@dustinwagner2453]

Just one Ford class super carrier battle group could take on the combined might of the entire world and we have 10 Ford class super carriers.

[@alecjacobs8971]

decent ,but honestly it didn't seem like America entered the war till the end. Also, India is the largest democracy in the world why are they joining Russia and it's allies?? plus America and it's allies navy and air force are much larger. is it nukes that decided the battle?? NATO also has anti nuclear missiles in eastern Europe. I'm not complaining, some things I didn't make sense to me.

[@wijakeak47]

lol germany left the game, so realistic

[@dankerlordx2884]

North America, South America, and Europe VS Russia and China.

[@befa5322]

"Germany leaves NATO and becomes neutral" I hope so 👍😃

[@LiterallyWho1917]

Isaac from New Town germany learned the hard way that war is overrated

[@WDLC1911]

Interesting.

[@enigma2541]

I see this simulation going somewhat differently. To start Russia like every other country in the world is codependent on international trade and not Economically stable enough to follow through with military action of this scale Furthermore Russia needs Europe to buy its oil and natural gas otherwise their economy tanks. I believe Russia would more than likely end their campaign at the Baltic sea after taking control of most of its neighboring countries; Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania along with parts of Belarus and Ukraine At that point it would become harder to mobilize and supply its troops. Here's Where I see things going very differently because by now Russia Isn't only fighting NATO they are also fighting the UN and furthermore Russia's military is stalled, it takes time to capture a country its not as simple as rolling through with tanks and calling it yours. On top of that Russia's economy is stressed (I suppose they hadn't learned from WW2, The Cold War and the fall of the Soviet Union) The U.S. what remains of NATO as well as UN forces are effectively mobilized and on the ground in Europe and Turkey and The push back begins. Eventually everything grinds to a halt hard to say where the borders fall but by now both sides have seen casualties either equivalent or double that of WW2. Russia's Economy is on the brink of collapse probably supporting itself with Loans from China. At this point Russia has a Choice does it fight until the end possibly even using its nuclear arsenal ensuring destruction for all or do they reach out for peace and maintain control of a little of what they had conquered? A few other points.I don't foresee India taking part in this war unless its against Afghanistan or China. Japan doesn't have a standing army navy or air force its constitution only allows them to have a national defense force. Northern Africa has enough on its plate there's no way they would do anything against Europe. And like I said all countries rely on International trade to survive so this kind of scenario is just not very plausible. I know that was just created for fun, I apologize for the long winded comment but a little bit of real world knowledge goes a long way.

[@DxvinderSingh1699]

So this is ww3 john price we need you...

[@Jamesdead01988]

you earned a like!

[@AirPanda22]

make another one with no nukes and one where the nato countries work together. You absolutely left out the US until the invasion of alaska

[@ldznuts]

As inaccurate as this seems, this is the most accurate simulation that I've found so far.

[@JurzGarz]

I honestly don't see how. China doesn't have the naval strength to challenge the US in the Pacific. Italy wouldn't leave NATO because of commercial relationship with Russia, as that would quickly become irrelevant in a war, which would cut Italy-Russia trade. India would not be on the same side as China, Bulgaria has no reason to switch sides, and Israel would stay neutral.

[@apolloprime3676]

This guy's an idiot. Why would India side against the uk? makes no sense on top of all his other retarded claims.

[@JurzGarz]

***** "their new generation anti ship smart missiles can't be countered by anything the U.S. " Source needed. "the US fleet and carriers would all be sunk in the first few days, then the U.S. Would only be able to operate subs." Don't make me laugh. If land based, all the US has to do is keep the ships out of range and destroy them with airstrikes. If naval based, then the Chinese are just as vulnerable.

[@aleksandarrudic3694]

It's just a loose economic union at this point, whose goal is to undermine American grip on world economy (read: create alternative to almighty dollar). In a military conflict, it is quite likely that all of these will stay neutral. It is unclear why even China which is perhaps Russian strongest ally, would intervene in Europe, they just don't have any interest to do so because that would ruin Chinese economy (you don't attack ones you do business with, and China is doing its business with the West, and earning thousands of billions from it each year. They do quite fine in peace, why would they seek war?).

[@roryharris4798]

Their troops are so badly trained it's unbelievable and don't get me started on the equipment they use

[@kriskata174]

Game name

[@sidchandran5057]

India is not with Russia. India has good relations with the U.S and other NATO members. We would be neutral and try our best to stop the conflict to arise.

[@SCHMULBACH22]

Goddamn it Texas

[@Haukadulur]

Awesome

[@moelio20]

italia leave nato you just want the russian to win thats crazy even if russia win in the battlefild they loose in propaganda and can hold allies or land maybe in the balcas but only guerrilla

[@DeBellorumSimulationibus]

+moelio20 in my opinion the western countries would leave because they have good relationships with Russia, there's no sense attacking it because they know that if NATO increases the troops near Russian borders, Russia will do this too, and they know how much they would loose attacking it. They would win, probably, but countries would be run by anarchy. Europe wouldnt be motivated in such war. The US recently increased American troops in Europe. Europe disliked because had fear of the consequeces. Putin said: "if they think that we will increase our military expenditure for conventional war, they're wrong. Modern war doesn't need them". The Russian strategy is pretty easy: De-escalation. De escalation means that if foreign troops enter in russian territory or they see a fleet in the Middle of the ocean approaching to them, they will fire tactical nukes.

[@rokloknita9494]

your forgetting eu if one country in eu gets attaked. well you know the base premis. but germany is the leader of eu and wouldnt just leave eu.