The F22 has been in service since 2005. Old Technology. The Chinese and Russians have only just caught up to that dinosaur. The US has the B21 and a new sixth-gen fighter already test flown and in development.
@romanberkutov25922 жыл бұрын
Настолько же надежный как ф117 ?
@jeffreyexposito38032 жыл бұрын
The F22 is still far superior to the SU57 and J20. Very few people dispute that. The F22 is a true 5th generation fighter. The SU 57 and J20 are not.
@xkeyscore11202 жыл бұрын
@@romanberkutov2592 Wow you shot down the f117. It was built in the 70s. Lucky shot. Eight F117s were out that night. You got one. It went out without any E6 prowler support that's why it was hit. Next 🤣
@MattttG32 жыл бұрын
@@romanberkutov2592 you're all on borrowed time 🤭🤤😋 thank chinese military scientist for our upcoming hypersonic glide vehicles also 😏😉🥳
@e.s.55292 жыл бұрын
@@xkeyscore1120 a new Harvard study proved Vodka cause dementia in European males 🤣
@deanpatterson90362 жыл бұрын
Only one production SU-57 the other one crashed!
@19JEFFRO672 жыл бұрын
I think they have 12 but 6 are just for spare parts 😂😂😂😂😂
@deanpatterson90362 жыл бұрын
@@19JEFFRO67 ALL prototypes, except 2 production SU-57, because the other one crashed. Why the delay? What happened to the big contract with India? It has been over a decade... where are the squadrons of SU-57s??? ................ Putin's gas station doesn't make enough money.
@blazinchalice2 жыл бұрын
@@deanpatterson9036 India backed out of the deal, hence no serial production in numbers that would matter.
@lovinradios64952 жыл бұрын
Come on, russia takes old jets that were huge dinosaurs and mount strategic missles on em...thats all you need is to be wrapped around a nuke in a non stealth airframe
@jo03rsxs2 жыл бұрын
The SU-57 only flies at air shows! Does it even have any actual combat flight use at all???? The Russian trolls always want to sat it’s so superior but it never gets sent close to any combat zones that I’m aware of. Same for the Chinese flying garbage can J-20
@joefuselier23292 жыл бұрын
The F22 Raptor is awesome. The Su57 and J20 from Russia/China does not even come close in any department. If five F15 aircraft can't take out a F22 flown by F22 Raptor pilots; its a darn good sure bet these two enemy aircraft won't be able to do it as well! The proof is the fact that actual dogfighting took place at Nellis AFB. Good luck trying to beat that!
@rjb11152 жыл бұрын
Yeah, all the Red Flag data is cool too look at
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith 🤣😂🤣😂
@MrFlatage2 жыл бұрын
Yes a JEDI Master pilot can fly through a Star Wars canyon and wipe out an entire squadron of F22s undetected. No one can beat that.
@t74guard782 жыл бұрын
@@MrFlatage Really, wowwwwwww and here we all thought we were all adults here.
@MrFlatage2 жыл бұрын
@@t74guard78 Yes the kiddo's behind fake names wouldn't survive the JEDI Transition course flying from Edwards Airforce base. To fly through Death Valley's Rainbow canyon you need to be old enough child. Sorry. Listen to the adults!
@sgt.grinch32992 жыл бұрын
As much as I love these types of videos, we do not need to publish our equipment upgrades.
@greytwolf50952 жыл бұрын
This, holy crap, thank you for being the only commenter with a functional brain.
@jydeoz6592 жыл бұрын
Your adversories probably knows about this weapon even at the early stages of its development. Therefore publishing it or leaking the information might actually help you guys control what they think they know, either hype it or underreport its capabilities.
@greytwolf50952 жыл бұрын
@@jydeoz659 shhh you dont say that shit There’s multiple faces to every Cold War
@mikehenderson70062 жыл бұрын
If you see it , it's already obsolete.
@michaelm89732 жыл бұрын
If we are publishing an upgrade that means they already have a better system 9 times out of 10. Like when we admitted we had the f117 we were already developing the b2. We show some of our cards which isn’t smart but we still have plenty in our deck.
@Dr_Augustus_MD2 жыл бұрын
IRST technology has also been under development for use with tracking hypersonic glide weapons. It would appear the Sino-Russian hypersonic weapon inventory now may also be at risk as the result of superior American technology.
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith Rachael Madcow🤣😂🤣😂
@pds22732 жыл бұрын
@@MarineScoutSniper Exactly!
@hkfoo33332 жыл бұрын
so you think by those it is superior? Good luck .. to an old plane if it lasts fighting the Chinese or Russian stealth .
@bekeneel2 жыл бұрын
@@hkfoo3333 Lol it is well known russian & chinese planes are shit, and russia can't even get all parts anymore cuz of the sanctions lol. This 20 year old airplane is even still better than anything russia or china currently has!
@hkfoo33332 жыл бұрын
@@bekeneel well it is also well known that all the hypes about US equipments are more hype than real. e.g. the Patriots supposed to be so good but last after Chinese Hq9 and Russian S300. It is well known that countries prefer to face sanctions to buy S400 than the fake Patriots. In fact US quickly withdrew their Patriots from SA, when it failed to prtotect. So are your old F22 and F35. All not proven against another stealth much less the super powerful J20 with its super modern electronics. hahahahahaha .. good try mate. US equipments in those ships are all old Tomahawks subsonic vs supersonic and hypersonic Chniese missiles. Chinese bvr PL15 outranges anything us Has ... and so on. Ya ... Chinese and Russian planes are shit while yours is sooo good. Come on bring it on lad.
@pepperVenge2 жыл бұрын
Just days ago I was sitting in my car at a red light staring up at the light, and just over the light, in broad daylight, I saw what I could only identify as an F-22 (if not then an F-35), flying pretty low over my city. The Peculiar thing was, as close and as low to the ground the F-22 appear to be, and how fast it appeared to be going, I couldn't hear it. I rolled all my windows down to try and listen to it while I was still staring at it, and I could not hear a thing.
@pepperVenge2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith Dude, I couldn't hear it.
@pepperVenge2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith Stop what?
@spackle99992 жыл бұрын
@@pepperVenge I think it's a Chinese bot.
@pepperVenge2 жыл бұрын
@@spackle9999 The John Smith guy?
@spackle99992 жыл бұрын
@@pepperVenge Yeah
@Villain18742 жыл бұрын
F22 is such a beautiful aircraft - it’s the modern day Spitfire - it’s also deadly 🇺🇸🇬🇧
@spenserlimas68782 жыл бұрын
Hit em with them facts BOI🇺🇸🐐🍺🔌
@philswiftreligioussect96192 жыл бұрын
Hell yeeh 🇺🇸🔥🔥
@spenserlimas68782 жыл бұрын
@@philswiftreligioussect9619 Adapt and Overcoming is in Americas DNA🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🐐
Yes indeed. The F-22 Raptor is simply an awesome aircraft.
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith Rachael Madcow🤣😂🤣😂
@hkfoo33332 жыл бұрын
keep dreaming if it is any match for the J20 or Su57... We do not know yet... do we?
@philthai992 жыл бұрын
The F-22 and F-35 are simply better aircraft. The US has the better technology and numbers. The true fact is that the US is updating its fleet of A-10s, F-15EX, F-16s, F-22s and F-35s. The Russians and Chinese don't have the production numbers and at best will only be able to deploy a handful in the air. The US already has a 6th generating fighter as wel
@hkfoo33332 жыл бұрын
@@philthai99 I like to ask you ... how do you know the F35 or the F22 are both better than the Russian Su57 and J20 both using latest tech and in certain areas far far superior than anything the F35 or F22 has. How do you know the J20 or the su57 are inferior? Who said so? Americans ? Well of course you guys will trumpet until the cows come home its the best .. when facts showed many Amercian made weapons are just not up to the hype they presented to be. Case in point the Patriots ... no one wants . The F35 is still riddled with lots of unsolved problems but forced into service...etc Fact is that no stealth plane can claim superiority over the other as long as there is no battel between the two. As to the numbers, China did not mass produce their J20 because of the delays in their engines. Now that they have solved that rest be assure they are mass producing it and when China makes anything from subs , ships to carriers, they can out produce any country in the world by many folds. So now China is mass producing their J20s with latest tech and latest designs and will more than match US stealth planes in numbers and quality. That is China you are talking about .... I do qualify ... J20 too had not been proven to be able to take on the US stealth planes no matter how high tech they are as there had been no one to one fight so far.
@philthai992 жыл бұрын
The same reason why the US F-22 and F-35 have been flying for years while your so handful of SU-57 and J-20 are completely unproven aircraft. The Indians have already proven they can detect the J-20. The technology in the F-22 and F-35 is vastly superior as well and the US is upgrading its fleet now.
@ThatCarGuy2 жыл бұрын
Best fighter in the world by far. Can not wait to see what 6th gen brings us.
@blazinchalice2 жыл бұрын
Gen 6 will bring robots with autonomous kill capability. I'm not excited to see the dawn of supersonic kill bots.
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith Rachael Madcow🤣😂🤣😂. Yeah she is the expert on absolutely nothing 🤣😂🤣😂
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
@John Smith 🤣😂. USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸
@disgruntledenlisted84862 жыл бұрын
@@blazinchalice wingman robots. The formation leader will be human and have to authorize use of force by the drones
@blazinchalice2 жыл бұрын
@@disgruntledenlisted8486 Loyal Wingman is almost ready for service. We are talking about true 6th gen aircraft, which will be fully autonomous and will have the ability to engage targets without human input.
@jeffreyexposito38032 жыл бұрын
Adding an IRST is just icing on the cake. The F22 is still regardless far superior and totally outclasses the SU57 and J20
@milosmilictrob20462 жыл бұрын
No, J-20 maybe, or should i say u are right about that one, but F-22 isnt better than Su-57, since Su-57 has 5 radars 2 of which are L band radars used to detect 5th generation fighters. IRST used by US is behind of those used by Russia or even China.
@jeffreyexposito38032 жыл бұрын
@@milosmilictrob2046 Practically every objective analyses concludes that the F22 is far superior to the SU57 and that the SU57 is not even 5th generation. Stop drinking the Russian propaganda cool aid There's a reason that no country has shown interest in the SU57 other than Russia
@GVK-jm9sg2 жыл бұрын
@@milosmilictrob2046 deluded
@milosmilictrob20462 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyexposito3803 By what standards is Su-57 not a stealth aircraft? Stealth? Well using an argument of "It has no RAM" or "It has its bolts visible" is so flawed and funny since all of that was fixed on production models, prototype models arent going to be used for combat but for testing so those things arent important, u can even see that Russians have fixed that on their production versions. Also no, they dont, F-22 never saw combat, it has no combat record except maybe a few missions of protecting bombers over Afghanistan and Syria, Su-35 has a confirmed lock on F-22 in Syria, unlie F-22, Su-57 uses 5 radars, all AESA (3 are X band and 2 are L band), with L band being able to detect fighters, since its a long wave , you cannot get a confirmed lock with it since they are quite inaccurate but its enough to give Su-57 knowlage that something is close by, let alone Su-57s IRST sensors , and Russians are pioneers in that, another way of spotting F-22 before it knew Su-57 was even up (considering both had their radars off). kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKmaY5yNqqt9eZo this channel disagrees with you. I really like how u assume i believe everything that Russia says but also deny the fact that you believe in US propaganda. Yes countries have showed interest in Su-57, Algeria, Turkey, Vietnam and even UAE,
@milosmilictrob20462 жыл бұрын
@@GVK-jm9sg No evidence that im deluded, also just because it dosent suit your views dosent mean im wrong and ur right especially when you havent provided a single peace of evidence.
@lando12962 жыл бұрын
I thought they were stealth pods for additional missiles or stealth ECM pods.
@jzk39192 жыл бұрын
These look very different from being IRST and why would advanced IRST need TWO EXTERNAL pods 50 years after the MiG-29`s single, internal, small IRST?
@stevem23232 жыл бұрын
@@jzk3919 If they are not for IRST, Raptor will still get ti.
@5777Whatup2 жыл бұрын
You see the white “dots” on the jet? I speculate that it is how they are tracking the jet and determining how well those pods combine with the jet…. Thoughts? I think they are Infrared reflective.
@lovinaklife3322 жыл бұрын
They are used for measuring and reference points when reviewing video of jet for evaluation and scrutinizing after post testing
@5777Whatup2 жыл бұрын
@@lovinaklife332 I said that. 2nd sentence. I’m asking about other than in the visual spectrum. They could be IR reflective etc. to examine if all kinds of camera views. Cameras that are used for terminal impact etc.
@Nitrous-ej5zy2 жыл бұрын
It seems like they are on all the missile hatches. Prolly to see how visible those are open.
@5777Whatup2 жыл бұрын
@@Nitrous-ej5zy yesssssssssssssssssssss, but for VISUAL SPECTRUM ONLY OR NAHHH. Damn I must not have typed this right.
@peterbrooks99842 жыл бұрын
It looks a bit like the Sniper targeting pod that has been in use for years.
@BENKYism2 жыл бұрын
Is it IRST though?
@fbi8052 жыл бұрын
LMFAO they never had an advantage in the first place. The F-22 is the only fighter in world that can sustain speeds over mach 1.5 without using afterburners, both the J-20 and SU57 have to use afterburners to even catch the F-22
@jimmay19882 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was thinking. Knockoffs will always be stragglers.
@Cartoonman1542 жыл бұрын
Supercruise
@rageknight23402 жыл бұрын
What you mean bro? J20 comes with usb c and Bluetooth and SU-57 comes with an Adidas track suit plenty to kill the raptor!!
@justinlance41742 жыл бұрын
@@rageknight2340 right. Lol. Russia can't even build a reliable asea radar. Even African and Indonesian militarys are choosing western over russian aircraft. For good reason
@oat_muffin29012 жыл бұрын
It's also the only one of those planes with all-aspect stealth: designed to be equally stealthy from all vectors. It has an even smaller RCS than F35.
@teddy.d1742 жыл бұрын
The F-22 was supposed to be manufactured with IRST. They had trouble finding room for it on the airframe.
@padjo84302 жыл бұрын
F22 what a plane and only getting better
@emilatik85812 жыл бұрын
We just need more of them in a restarted mass production scale (or have they already,due to the ever-escalating intensity of a situation with Xi-china and Putin-russia? Hmm?Anybody who knows that for sure then tell us that or confirm immediately with any kinds of link here, pls?) to really make them super ideal and 100 or 110 % capable and overall superior towards its near-peering adversarial ones, hopefully before when the best US defense contractors are officially about to develop the next F-22 Raptor 0.2-like 6. gen or two 6. gen jets.Yeah 💎🌈👌✌👍
@Hemlockdelta2 жыл бұрын
@@emilatik8581 Congress has limited the active F-22 fleet to 187 operational aircraft. The General of the Air Force requested more to combat Russian and Chinese 5th generation fighter developments, but this request was denied.
@tilakranjithgunasekara80892 жыл бұрын
WE ARE PROUD OF U.S.A AND IT'S SMART PEOPLE AND THE TECHNOLOGY.
@thomasridenour2772 жыл бұрын
It's also a numbers game. The Chinese have less than 50 J20 and we have no idea how air worthy they are. How many SU57's have the Russian built...not many. The US has 122 , F-22's. Too many videos like yours compares technical data and ignores numbers....Interesting video but incomplete .
@dkoz83212 жыл бұрын
It maybe a low RCS weapon pod to hold additional AIM-9X and AIM-120C/D, A/G weapon like Stormbreaker, SDBIII, or fuel. It could be enclosure for SniperXR or another pod. It could be enclosure for reconnaissance, It could for new kind of electronic warfare. It could be a tactical high energy LASER, one pod houses beam emitter, and other pod holds lasing medium. Or the external pod may be configurable all the above. Its job is to serve as low RCS shell for whatever equipment USAF decided to put there. Could also be a scale prototype for full size low RCS pod.
@kelvinkudirical14382 жыл бұрын
I think it's both electronic warfare and irst pod because a aircraft never uses more than 1 irst and it also looks like traditional electronic warfare pod
@spackle99992 жыл бұрын
Or it could be a "waveform translator", allowing communication between old Link 16 and MADL.
@kelvinkudirical14382 жыл бұрын
@@spackle9999 its first time I have heard something about wave form translator I don't know what it is 😅😅
@ericbrammer22452 жыл бұрын
That last 'Raptor', is a 'Black Stealth One', as noted by Dean Ing...
@williamdawson37922 жыл бұрын
China has approximately 20 J-20’s, Russia 2dozen SU-57. The Us has well over 1000 F-22 Raptors. Let that sink in.
@Jp-kc8ko2 жыл бұрын
over 100*
@Archer892012 жыл бұрын
Only 187 Raptors were made and a couple have crashed
@shadowrealm80142 жыл бұрын
A sexy bird the raptor
@NinjaKiller10222 жыл бұрын
The only jet that can come close to the F22 Raptor is the F35. For anyone that thinks that the Su57 and J20 can come close, you are sadly mistaken and delusional at best. The RCS of the jet should be a clear indication of this.
@abysmith90832 жыл бұрын
unfortunately God has abandoned America. The F-22 cannot compensate for that....
@dr.j56422 жыл бұрын
@@abysmith9083 America has abandoned God in many ways. Few even know their faith, and many others are happy to divide the body of believers and fight amongst themselves, instead of uniting against the evils of the world: the tyranny of communism, the violence and extremism of Islam, and the immorality of atheism, as well as all their lies. Its up to us to keep the faith, may God bless you.
@dagger64672 жыл бұрын
@@abysmith9083 fuq god. Fake sky fairy.
@calvinringo38862 жыл бұрын
F-23 was better then the f-22
@neilstern71082 жыл бұрын
@@dr.j5642 the world is a stumbling block, for those without faith. Time is now to wear the armor of the lord. Blessed is his son who came to save us from ourselves.
@apocraphontripp47282 жыл бұрын
Like the tiles. Its looks like a space craft now.
@nighttow87802 жыл бұрын
It's light bending technology. We've all seen this before. The Invisible Man? Remember the invisible tank? These incidents were some years ago
@MarineScoutSniper2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely the Best Fighter in the World
@llamudos98092 жыл бұрын
We have heard rumours of a new technology that will be fitted within the skin of the new 6th gen jets that allows several functions including Infrared detection and absorbtion/muffling this is just two of the new skins the latest 6th gen jets will have in USA and maybe UK. I have also heard that the jet wings (skins) will also self repair when damage and reconfigure connectivity if fibre optic cables become damaged. This is crazy tech and its appears that its becoming a reality. We have even started to see skins that reduce visibility literally turning the jet invisible. Add the fact that the next jets will use fluidic thrust vectoring these new fighter jets will also have literally no RCS for RADAR to pick up on as the jets do not use tail fins. The tests already seen from fluidic thrust vectoring will see the new jets make maneuvers which will defy all known flight manuevers and create unbelievable AOAs
@rjb11152 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info
@glennfrick79752 жыл бұрын
The Air Force is being TIGHT LIPPED about the developed Drone Fighter Technology. PILOTS significantly limit the Potential capabilities overall. A pilot has to stay CONSCIOUS and this is quickly giving attack DRONES an Advantage over Humans 🧨🧨🧨
@t74guard782 жыл бұрын
Actually that stuff isn't new to the USAF, just us. People have seen them flying in the skies for a long time now. They call them UFO's. The USAF doesn't, they have identified them since they started flying them.
@llamudos98092 жыл бұрын
@@t74guard78 When you consider that the original conceptual drawing for the f-22 was created in the 60s you start to understand how far advanced they are in reality.
@kevf5002 жыл бұрын
Good addition to f 22 should help out
@mikeharvey91842 жыл бұрын
I've seen a couple of comments to the effect that we shouldn't be broadcasting this type of thing. Some of the best advice my old kenpo instructor was this... the most effective way to not lose a fight is to not get in one. Reminding Russia and China of how badly they're at a disadvantage is a good way to never need to actually prove it.
@greytwolf50952 жыл бұрын
But, silently accepting your advantage can leave an enemy unprepared and defenseless.
@fredeb672 жыл бұрын
I don't think that is IRST due to it being optical. I think it is either a jammer pod or side looking radar antenna used to lock targets of bore and to the sides of the aircraft.
@SuperArturski2 жыл бұрын
Nice, those features are badly needed for continued deterrence.
@georgechristoforou9912 жыл бұрын
F22 is quite visible to Russian aircraft tracking systems. F22&f35 avoid s400 missile defence systems.
@SvenJT2 жыл бұрын
Any proof to go along with your statement? The Israel Air Force reports little tactical operation changes even with the S400 system in the area. 'shrug'
@georgechristoforou9912 жыл бұрын
@@SvenJT What do you mean "little tactical operation changes". Like not flying near Syrian airspace but instead using surface to surface missiles to hit targets near Damascus, following a mysterious Syrian missile shooting apparently nothing. I mean if nothing was hit by the Syrian missile then why the retaliation?
@georgechristoforou9912 жыл бұрын
@@SvenJT kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHWyeXZoZrFrgc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2rPqpabodOIsLs kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppC0Z4lmgpKCpNE at 31.30
@MrFlatage2 жыл бұрын
@@SvenJT Cool so ... post the report? Then we can all proof read and fact check.
@Shinobubu2 жыл бұрын
Also those pods are experimental lab units. they will be integrated with the wing when their study is completed.
@czts47782 жыл бұрын
Irst should be internal, not exposed under the wings.
@mikeharvey91842 жыл бұрын
Yes, but it's pointed out that there isn't room inside the aircraft for something like the F-35's setup to fit.
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
The F-14 had it under the chin, the F/18C/D/E/F, and F-16 uses a pod.
@donaldjonesgonzalez27612 жыл бұрын
ALL APPROVED.
@g.g.hochstetler22862 жыл бұрын
Now they just need to get high off bore sight capabilities and to start producing a modern variant.
@ochat20102 жыл бұрын
Bring on the Russian fan boys!!!
@jaromor88082 жыл бұрын
you remind me of Demonrats - fighting racism where there's none... look at the fkin comment section, 99of the comments are screeching US fangirls (no, i am absolutely not suggesting F-22 is not superior)
@carlosandleon2 жыл бұрын
ngl su 57 is sexy af
@ochat20102 жыл бұрын
@@carlosandleon yea its not bad looking
@ochat20102 жыл бұрын
@@jaromor8808 ...huh? You ok bro?
@SSPENGUIN12 жыл бұрын
Is the new coating have anything to do with attempt to reduce the damage enemy lasers can inflict on the aircraft?
@auro19862 жыл бұрын
isn't there any space for irst pod inside nose cone?
@johnsilver93382 жыл бұрын
The F-22 should have the same if not better avionics compared to F-35 like the EOTS. It makes no sense for F-22 carrying pods that minimizes its greatest advantage which is its stealth chracteristics.
@paradiddlesixix75302 жыл бұрын
stealth doesnt matter if you are flying around unable to find the enemies stealth planes. especially if your enemy CAN find you with THEIR ir trackers. the last to see their enemy is the the first to die in most cases. the f35 is more advanced than the f22 in almost every way. its just not as fast or manueverable. with those pods, its still probably just as stealthy as an f35.
@liberty4all8852 жыл бұрын
That’s freaking awesome
@bluepicasso96752 жыл бұрын
excellent
@jusjetz2 жыл бұрын
An Old Dog can learn new tricks.
@-JA-2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@dbs5552 жыл бұрын
A variant F-22 with the IRST unit and extra cannon could sneak up on most any other aircraft and destroy it with guns, without opening the bay doors for a missile launch.
@qarmatianwarhorse60282 жыл бұрын
Doesn't have more than a 50 nm range and that too depends on weather. Moving on...
@wilhelmheinzerling53412 жыл бұрын
there go the stealth...
@MisteriosGloriosos9222 жыл бұрын
*Great video! Thanks for sharing!!*
@chrisoaten2912 жыл бұрын
Na ...Thats not IRST looks like jamming pods .
@Realcjs2 жыл бұрын
Checkmate
@lemmingt62072 жыл бұрын
check six
@theodorekell2 жыл бұрын
Is this the attachment that will give away the plane?
@ma61king2 жыл бұрын
Seems unlikely that the US would be making major developments to the F22, if anything it would make more sense that they'd be using it as a testbed for systems for a future fighter
@hkfoo33332 жыл бұрын
they cant because the old plane does not have enough room to new tech ... so a new plane is needed
@ma61king2 жыл бұрын
That's why the pods are mounted to the wings. And as it's a test bed, they can remove stuff they aren't using to test other stuff
@Shinobubu2 жыл бұрын
They had zero advantages now they have even less.
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
They have 150+ advantages, The F-22 is in active service the SU-57 is not
@Cartoonman1542 жыл бұрын
The F-22 is only just getting an IR sensor?
@43Magicman2 жыл бұрын
And the Russian Su57 & Chinese J20 are not....😂🤣😂
@Cartoonman1542 жыл бұрын
@@43Magicman They already have an IRST sensor. It just seems a strange oversight considering it has been on American aircraft before.
@milosmilictrob20462 жыл бұрын
@@43Magicman All Russian jets have IRST, 3rd generation IRST, they have been using is since they found out that was possible.
@ThatCarGuy2 жыл бұрын
Yes it was to expensive at the time along with everything else so it was cut as it was the only stealth fighter at the time, so no real need.
@Cartoonman1542 жыл бұрын
@@ThatCarGuy Found a good article on this from "Pilot's world. The title is 'The F-22 Raptor could get both an IRST Sensor and a Helmet-Mounted Display and Targeting System'
@zagrepcanin822 жыл бұрын
Who buys that numbers of rcs? When and where measurment took place? And who performed scan?Are you crazy!??? It is top secret info Nobody knows
@maxd50382 жыл бұрын
We spend close the 800B a year on defense and have for a long time… how is it that we do not yet have an aircraft more advanced than the F22… this was built to counter the Soviet Union which collapsed a long time ago. Enough time has passed to which we should have fully operational 6th gen fighters, or even more advanced
@raymondhernandez83372 жыл бұрын
Luck our enemy doesn't know this, until now.
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
You know that the Chinese government built a Chinese temple near the L/M plant in Palmdale with cameras right?
@myplane1502 жыл бұрын
So, you need to get the F22 to within 50 miles (some even say 30 miles) or so to see it via IRST. If that happens, the Raptor pilot f*cked up really bad. The SU57 and J20 would be very dead well before the Raptor is in range. Also, the AA-11 (R73) Russian Infrared missile has a range of less than 20 miles. The IRST was never an advantage.
@riddhijitsen80702 жыл бұрын
Yes you are right but what if they simply make a better irst sensor and a missile., It's very much possible, making a better irst and a missile is way more easier than modifying an aircraft
@rodrozil65442 жыл бұрын
@@riddhijitsen8070 I bet there are brilliance in both Russia and China as in USA.
@M16_Akula-III2 жыл бұрын
First thing, the Russians don't use the R73 for medium range engagement, they use the R-27.
@publius_scipio2 жыл бұрын
@@bigfish1676 Russia adopts a surface-to-air missile doctrine instead of air superiority doctrine if im correct, dont they?
@MrFlatage2 жыл бұрын
@@bigfish1676 We all know trolls spread disinformation hiding behind fake names. But it's just stories and lies. You and Putino cannot provide evidence to anything can you? English Cambridge dictionary on Stealth:'An aircraft that cannot be seen by radar'? Yes that does not exist. So just like your Adolph before you made up some 'Wonderweapons'? Your propaganda also fails. Facts always win.
@mikekopack64412 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but I call BS on those pylons being an IRST setup. First off, why would you need 2 of them? Second, there's no window visible for the IR sensor to see through...
@777Outrigger2 жыл бұрын
The F-22 is not more stealthy than the F-35!!! In 2005, the USAF said the F-35 would be about twice as stealthy as the F-117, and slightly more stealthy than the B-2. But a few years ago General Hostage of ACC said the F-35 was actually more stealthy than the F-22. That left a lot of people scratching their heads, since the F-22 has more disciplined shaping. It’s probably due to fiber-mat which Lockheed Martin announced in 2010, as a breakthrough stealth material. Not only did it make stealth easy and cheaper to maintain, (Full stealth for 40 years) it was probably excellent at absorbing radar waves at all frequencies…... This means the F-35 has an RCS of at least .0001M2.
@mikekopack64412 жыл бұрын
Not true at all... F-22 is def more stealthy. The f-35's 3rd gen stealth coatings are easier to apply and maintain than the F-22's (which are crazy expensive). But the F-22 is still a more stealthy design overall.
@777Outrigger2 жыл бұрын
@@mikekopack6441 Both General Bogdan, former F-35 program director, and General Hostage, former ACC commander, have said the F-35 is more stealthy than the F-22. General Bogdan did so in Senate testimony. "Hostage caused a stir in late spring when, in press interviews, he said the F-35 would be stealthier than the F-22, its larger USAF stablemate. Conventional wisdom had pegged the F-22, with its angled, vectored-thrust engines, as a stealthier machine than the F-35. Hostage also said the F-35 would be unbeatable when employed in numbers, which is why the full buy of aircraft is “so critical.” “I would say that General Hostage … is accurate in his statement about the simple stealthiness of the F-35 [with regard] to other airplanes,” Bogdan said in the interview. The statement was accurate for radar cross section, as measured in decibels, and range of detectability, he said, and he scoffed at the notion that anyone can tell how stealthy an aircraft is just by looking at it." www.airforcemag.com/article/The-F-35-on-Final-Approach/
@mikekopack64412 жыл бұрын
@@777Outrigger Believe whatever you want... I work for LM and have been to both the F-22 (when it was running) and F-35 assembly lines...
@777Outrigger2 жыл бұрын
@@mikekopack6441 Believe what you want. Program director and ACC commander say otherwise.. "Hostage caused a stir in late spring when, in press interviews, he said the F-35 would be stealthier than the F-22, its larger USAF stablemate. Conventional wisdom had pegged the F-22, with its angled, vectored-thrust engines, as a stealthier machine than the F-35. Hostage also said the F-35 would be unbeatable when employed in numbers, which is why the full buy of aircraft is “so critical.” “I would say that General Hostage … is accurate in his statement about the simple stealthiness of the F-35 [with regard] to other airplanes,” Bogdan said in the interview. The statement was accurate for radar cross section, as measured in decibels, and range of detectability, he said, and he scoffed at the notion that anyone can tell how stealthy an aircraft is just by looking at it." www.airforcemag.com/article/The-F-35-on-Final-Approach/
@Xenomorphine2 жыл бұрын
it's nothing of the sort. They're for weapon flight and detachment tests. That's what the marks are for while filming.
@paulbarrett99512 жыл бұрын
You missed the one inbetweens the engineers
@SOUTHL.A.2 жыл бұрын
🇺🇸COME GET SUM!🇺🇲
@beaches2mountains2302 жыл бұрын
Man I was realĺlllllly hoping for LASER CANNONS!!!
@pruephillip13382 жыл бұрын
Bet the Chinese and Russians have subscribed to this video.
@semco720572 жыл бұрын
The J-20 Chinese jet isn't stealthy as we know and the SU-57 from Russia is probably only partially stealthy.
@GM-fh5jp2 жыл бұрын
Clearly they are the new cloaking device pods. Any Klingon worth his salt would recognise one.
@mephistopheles82202 жыл бұрын
whats up with the song? I'm like watching a cryptic urban legend video XD
@2CabrasLocas2 жыл бұрын
Are you saying the F22 is actually capable of flying now? After how many times being grounded for service bulletins...
@t74guard782 жыл бұрын
You must of just woke up from a seriously long coma. hahahhahahahahah wow talk about living under a rock.
@governmentcheese77262 жыл бұрын
LMAO! as id either EVER had an advantage over the F-22, lol...
@patricelauverjon31772 жыл бұрын
Positive Psychology tells us that pain and negativity often contain a message and that by not ignoring negativity the answers we get and the light at the end of the tunnel are the best, just as well as the money we enjoy the most is the result of honest and often hard work. Globally and locally the obvious painful errors of the authoritative left are bringing tremendous values to a lot of what has been taken as granted, mainly freedom and the matching politics. We can say that factual experiences have opened some doors to many, but the time has come to have things back to a normality which hopefully will not be taken for granted this time and that on going actions and narratives will follow.
@ConvexRook2 жыл бұрын
imagine trying to find a bee in the sky!!!
@watermirror2 жыл бұрын
IRST is put on a plane as counter to a super low RCS plane. So it's either USAF is being proactive if ever Russia or China managed to do that or Russia already did But a huge problem still remains esp if US will dance against China whether or not their J-20 & J-31 are knockoffs. Afaik, F-22 hugely depends on a proper airbase & long well prepared runways to operate. China will simply rain down their very low-cost strike missiles to target airbases (or even just damage runways) on Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Guam, etc to neutralize F-22. Same goes to all US planes except the F-35B
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
It looks like China v US will be a mostly US 7th and 3rd Fleet thing. The bulk of the US Navy's Carrier Strike Groups are assigned to those to the 3rd fleets and USN and USMC active F-35 squadrons are assigned to the 3rd Fleet. The 7th Fleet has Marine and amphibious assault and ASW units and F-35B's assigned to the USS America. The USAF will be playing a support and defensive role in Japan and Korea
@nazukeoya2 жыл бұрын
The Russian Su57 & Chinese J20 never had an advantage over the F-22 Raptor.
@fubarmofo69692 жыл бұрын
Lol what’s sad is our jet made in the 90’s as it is can kick the crap outta the best Russia and China has today without upgrades! Every upgrade just puts the f22 further ahead keeping Russia and China unable to catch up
@montevallomustang2 жыл бұрын
They are actually the power supply for the reflective panel projector. They are trying to make the f22 really vanish. 🤣
@Covert12 жыл бұрын
The f22, su57, an j20 will never fight each other
@spackle99992 жыл бұрын
It could happen next week, unfortunately.
@josephahner30312 жыл бұрын
The Su-57 definitely has no advantage over the Raptor given that the only prototype crashed and serial production was cancelled before it even began. A plane that doesn't exist can't beat one that does.
@bobbybrown.42572 жыл бұрын
My name is bobby. Thank You for this video
@Jim-mn7yq2 жыл бұрын
Hey, I understand people’s enthusiasm and a desire to know about technology. But the guy who took that first pic - if he worked for the Palmdale plant - should have his security clearance yanked and fired.
@kwaleanderson8162 жыл бұрын
Nothing matters but actual combat. I like this page but I’m all reality combat is all that matters everything else is speculation. A machine is only as good as it’s operator.
@willwozniak28262 жыл бұрын
Yeah, people sure love to thrash talk the F-35A. The plane everybody HATES...LOL
@lovinradios64952 жыл бұрын
mostly russian conventional equipment can't hold a candle to our nice shiny stealths, but then again, they just polish there nukes and warn us not to shoot their crap planes down , or they will nuke us...
@codyspencer97982 жыл бұрын
@@lovinradios6495 yeah but we can nuke back and no one wants to rule parking lots
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
Well, in that case, the US starts with a lead in training.
@samuelmcbride2 жыл бұрын
I am down with upgrading the F-22. Not sure why this is such a controversy. Who doesn't want to see an F-18 or F-22 kick ass on a mission?
@jeffstrom1642 жыл бұрын
The su57 and j20s never had an advantage. Neither are stealth fighters, just stealthier than previous plane designs.
@generalrendar72902 жыл бұрын
Still no way for it to carry fuel tanks in it's weapons bays though.
@haitianrefugee84542 жыл бұрын
Those are stealth fuel tanks
@84rb2 жыл бұрын
They seem to be too small for that. They are rather a jamming pods or other electronic equipment - I guess.
@jackholman50082 жыл бұрын
Who wins in a 1v1 f22 or f35
@imamanofculturepleasegivem54402 жыл бұрын
It depends on the pilot
@kenfelix87032 жыл бұрын
One problem the the j20 and the su57 are not meant for dog fights!
@Ram-12312 жыл бұрын
Actually, the SU-57 has many advantages over BOTH the F-22 AND F-35. The SU-57 is multi role and both planes in one essentially. SU-57 outperforms both American.F fighters. SU-57 also has L-band radar to DETECT ALL low observable platforms and can track 30 targets simultaneously and can fully operate missions without gps or data link. The 57 designation was no coincidence F(22) + F(35) 22+35=57. The F-35 was primarily designed to be sub par from F-22 and is more targeted towards NATO for sales and control. J-20 I'm pretty sure also has the American F family pet much dominated as well. The J-20 also is designed and built to take on both the roles the F Family share but in one plane and better. The more I learn about and see this plane the more I like it. They will have 200 by years end with and most all will have at least one new W-15 indigenous engine and ONE old W-10 until W-15 gets proven. Likely the next 100 before both switch to W-15 by 2023. J-20 also uses 6G data link while F is still 5G. At least as far as I know. J-20 will have 500 by 2024-2025. J-35 is starting production and even less is known about that but in thinking no less than 800. I think the J-35 will be export to counter F-35 and future Russian "Checkmate" sales. So when I say I think 800 I think that's what the Chinese will keep at the least. But this will be the future carrier based fighter for China although in not sure if it'll be the front line fighter. Only time will tell.
@garrisonsmith7532 жыл бұрын
Yeahhhh so I will agree with a bit of what you said except when it comes to the numbers…. Neither China or especially Russia has the means capable to produce fighters in that numbers in that short of time unless it’s an emergency situation. The Russian federation has 14 su-57s and 10 operating. Look the j-20 and su-57 are cool planes and have lots of cool tech. But (and this goes for the f-35 as well) they haven’t been around long enough to show their real time use. The f-22 has been tested in numerous countries in numerous affairs and situations. Either way the U.S. Air Force builds their platforms on the ability to update as well and the f-22 has so many abilities to update its hardware and software and the same can not be confirmed or said for much Russian and Chinese military equipment. Also Training of pilots when it comes to the U.S. is of a higher level and higher number. At the end of the day their is a reason that the f-35 didn’t replace the f-22 all together. That’s because the u.s. gov knew that it’s overkill and not practical to make an entire new platform 6th gen fighter when the f-22 is still the biggest competition out there. It’s not just as simple as it seems when it comes down to technology in the plane and number claims by the government. Remember that russia has a gdp equivalent to that of a couple US states and even if china is doing well with the trade war, if anything serious should happen and real american industry opened up despite having a totally incompetent leader, the United States economic power is beyond both countries combined and that is the truth. I’m not even American and I know this. America spends 900billion dollars per year on military Russia and China both together spend about 4-500billon. It’s not close.
@seanm73492 жыл бұрын
And if you believe all of that bullsh*t, I have a bridge to sell you.
@ketelin42852 жыл бұрын
@@seanm7349 Dont be so sure , the wheel cannot be kept as a state secret forever . Marginal advantages can be held , i still bet on US supremacy but the old age in which analog russian tech was beaten to death by early digital is kind of over . Everything is stealthy enough that small decoys would make the fight more like loto draw .
@paradiddlesixix75302 жыл бұрын
@@garrisonsmith753 900 billion doesnt include "black projects" that are not up for senate approval. its hard to estimate how much of that is in the militaries hands.
@speedracer23362 жыл бұрын
I think we have better pilots and tactics!
@i-love-space3902 жыл бұрын
Finally, when America is forced to economize rather than throwing unlimited funds at defence, we will start doing what Russia has done for years --- upgrade the capabilities of existing aircraft. I also think that in 10 years the capabilities of the F35 will constantly get better too. It was designed to be even MORE upgradeable than the F22 in software and interoperability with other weapon systems. Also the F15 and F18 will continue to build capability. Combined with the latest long range stealthy missiles and eventually hypersonic weapons we will be unbeatable in the air.
@ElkArrow2 жыл бұрын
At most there are only about 80 Raptors that are operational
@fbi8052 жыл бұрын
Lmao the U.S. has over 100 fully operational F-22s
@ElkArrow2 жыл бұрын
@@fbi805 Maybe we have over 100 Raptors but I've heard that at any given time only about 80 are operational. The rest are undergoing repairs or maintenance
@fbi8052 жыл бұрын
@@ElkArrow unlike the F-35 which requires twice the time in maintenance because of issues with electronic systems, the F-22s only maintenance concerns is keeping it's stealth coating at peek operation. In other words all F-22 raptors are fully operational
@miraphycs73772 жыл бұрын
@@fbi805 why would F-35 have problems with electronic systems and not F-22?
@fbi8052 жыл бұрын
@@miraphycs7377 while no aircraft (civilian or military) is problem free, the F-35 has had more accidents than the F-22. Nearly 95% of the problems that the F-22 has have been fixed while the F-35 continues to have major issues On 23 June 2014, an F-35A's engine caught fire at Eglin AFB. The pilot escaped unharmed, while the aircraft sustained an estimated US$50 million in damage. The accident caused all flights to be halted on 3 July. The fleet returned to flight on 15 July with flight envelope restrictions. In June 2015, the USAF AETC issued its official report, which blamed the failure on the third stage rotor of the engine's fan module, pieces of which cut through the fan case and upper fuselage. Pratt & Whitney applied an extended "rub-in" to increase the gap between the second stator and the third rotor integral arm seal, as well as design alterations to pre-trench the stator by early 2016. The first crash occurred on 28 September 2018 involving a USMC F-35B near, the pilot ejected safely. The crash was attributed to a faulty fuel tube; all F-35s were grounded on 11 October pending a fleet-wide inspection of the tubes. The next day, most USAF and USN F-35s returned to flight status following the inspection. On 9 April 2019, a JASDF F-35A attached to disappeared from radar about 84 miles (135 km) east of the during a training mission over the Pacific Ocean. The pilot, Major Akinori Hosomi, had radioed his intention to abort the drill before disappearing. The US and Japanese navies searched for the missing aircraft and pilot, finding debris on the water that confirmed its crash; Hosomi's remains were recovered in June. In response, Japan grounded its 12 F-35As. There was speculation that China or Russia might attempt to salvage it; the JDP announced there had been no "reported activities" from either country. The F-35 reportedly did not send a distress signal nor did the pilot attempt any recovery maneuvers as it descended at a rapid rate. The accident report attributed the cause to the pilot's spatial disorientatio. On 19 May 2020, a USAF F-35A from the 58th Fighter Squadron crashed while landing at Eglin AFB. The pilot ejected and was in stable condition.The accident was attributed to a combination of pilot error induced by fatigue, an design issue with the oxygen system and the aircraft's more complex nature being distracting, as well as a malfunctioning heads up display and an unresponsive flight control system. On 29 September 2020, a USMC F-35B crashed in California, after colliding with a Marine Corps KC-130 during air to air refueling. The F-35B pilot was injured in the ejection, and the KC-130 crash-landed gear up in a field. On 17 November 2021, a Royal Air Force F-35B crashed during routine operations in the Mediterranean. The pilot was safely recovered to HMS Qween Elizabeth. Early reports suggested some of "the covers and engine blanks" had not been removed before takeoff. The wreckage, including all security sensitive equipment, was largely recovered with the assistance of U.S. and Italian forces.[ On 4 January 2022, a South Korean Air Force F-35A made a belly landing after all systems failed except the flight controls and the engine. The pilot heard a series of bangs during low altitude flight, and various systems stopped working. The control tower suggested that the pilot eject, but he managed to land the plane without deploying the landing gear, walking away uninjured. 24 January 2022, a USN F-35C with crashed while landing aboard an aircraft carrier during training excersises in the South China Seas injuring seven crew members. The pilot ejected safely and was recovered from the water, while the wreck was lost overboard. Plans to recover the fighter are underway.
@jacksonteller13372 жыл бұрын
Su 57 never had any advantage, it has crappy engines, virtually no stealth and it's avionics are dated. They don't need help to burn on the ground, or crash and burn. The J-20 is detectable by early generation of PESA radars and from certain angles even by Pulse Doppler radar. They have Chinese avionics and the engines are lacking electronic power production.
@BenVaserlan2 жыл бұрын
ONLY advantage over the F-22? ONLY? So the F-22 has near 360 degree RADAR coverage, IRCM, L-band counter stealth RADARS, and ventral weapons bays that can contain missiles as large at the Su-57 can contain?
@Carlos-cy4uc2 жыл бұрын
F22 is totally superior. No doubt about that. Has better, and proven technologies. Su57 keep being only a demostrator
@jg30002 жыл бұрын
@@Carlos-cy4uc Nope. SU 57 has entered serial production. There is not a lot of them though.
@JordanSantana.2 жыл бұрын
@@jg3000 Serial production? They plan to have 50 by 2027, equip with old Su-27 engines isn’t helping.
@jg30002 жыл бұрын
@@JordanSantana. Is what it is. They will have active squadrons soon.
@garkmr62002 жыл бұрын
I wish they’d do subtitles, so I didn’t have to listen to it.
@charleyarchuleta49322 жыл бұрын
Lasers
@jeffbaxter87702 жыл бұрын
Why do all the fighters look identical? US, Russia, China
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
same rules
@SigaSigaJohn2 жыл бұрын
Really now? the 'most advanced' aircraft gets an 'edge' because of a pod? come on....