S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl - GTX 1660 - GTX 1650 - GTX 1050 Ti - GT 1030 i5 3470

[@stephendippenaar9986]

Very suprised the i5 3470 and gtx 1660 combo plays game well as i'm looking to get the gtx 1660 super or Ti model

[@LithiumDeuteride-6]

I hope the RT 6500 XT 4 GB will be able to provide 40-50 FPS at minimum settings, it is better to reduce the graphic settings, but increase the FPS. I'm no stranger to it, in 2008 I also played in the Shadow of Chernobyl on a weak PC, Radeon 9550 128 MB will not let you lie.

[@eljefe9106]

what makes you think its gonna work when you see the gameplay that this guy recorded

[@PredaToROffiCialll]

Will the game run on i5 2500k?

[@PredaToROffiCialll]

I checked that the i5 2500k works works perfectly

[@8YourWorstNightmare.]

The i5 works, nice. I'll try with an i7 4770 gtx 1650 to see if it runs the game on low.👍👍👍

[@finn7399]

Какой фпс?

[@kxtroll]

What about and i5 8400? Thanks for the vid

[@od1ez]

lol, when you play with framegen so you should divide fps by twice, 30fps = 15fps - its impossible to play

[@pretzelboi64]

50% of frames don't even contain any new information in practice so framegen is fine. A racing game would suffer but Stalker is kinda slow gameplay-wise

[@od1ez]

Nope, when you see 30fps on your screen, your input lag is only 15 fps, control is very weak, like in slow mo. Its 15fps lol

[@pretzelboi64]

@@od1ez So GoldenEye 64? Saying it's uncomfortable is whatever but unplayable? That's a skill issue because old games were all slow af like that

[@od1ez]

@@pretzelboi64 smth like psone times, if its no discomfort to someone to play like this, its great, no problem)

[@8YourWorstNightmare.]

I tried with gtx 1650 i7 4770 16gb ram it runs very slowly, it has many bugs🥺🥺

[@KinToxic9]

1660 gtx ti and Ryzen 5 2600 ( medium config to play?