Salomon v Salomon (1897)

[@sidthrh]

Thank you for the video! Love from Ireland

[@littlerascal9292]

Due to the vast nature of the case, there were some omissions regarding Aron Salomon's treatment. It is true that the prevailing attitude was that a businessman should pay his debts. However, the fact that it was a prevailing attitude does not mean to exclude the other attitudes of the London community at the time. It's really a very interesting case and if you are intrigued regarding the anti-semetic treatment of Salomon, I recommend reading- Adams John, Essays for Clive Schmittoff (1983).

[@blairstevenson3455]

I love the Salomon case. Great video

[@sparkaleshish]

love? why? Im hating law school :'(

[@dilchahatahai9875]

nice explaination of this case

[@BenskiEm]

thanks shafik

[@madhushikabawanthi7170]

👍 good

[@laurenstehr6740]

Does anyone know where I can get an actual copy of the case to read? I've been looking for a while now and can't seem to find one anywhere...

[@yavishaum]

on westlaw uk.. you should be able to find the whole case + judgement , as i did ;)

[@a.nahari380]

Guys, I still dont get this case well due to my poor english, at the end, Did Salomon get away with his debts ??

[@lakshyasangtani5485]

Yes he did, as at the conclusion of the case house of lords pronounced that after registeration co. Gets a seperate legal entity which is distinct from the members constituting it.

[@WhollyMowly]

Bit of a stretch to say that the portrayal of Salomon as a miser or 'grasping merchant' is therefore evidence of 'an anti-antisemitic London', isn't it? Particularly after you quite clearly recognised that the prevailing attitude was that a businessman should pay his debts.