Samyang AF 45mm F1.8 FE Definitive Review | 4K

[@lamontgilliland9664]

Dustin, you are one of my most trusted reviewers and share not only excellent technical and practical reviews, but are very pleasant to watch. Thank you for what you contribute to the photography community. :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's very kind. Thank you!

[@anbar5675]

Agreed totally.

[@jeffreygibbs]

"It's not perfect, but maybe it's better for it." That's such an insightful and beautifully articulated statement. Dustin Abbott, you really understand that intangible artistic component of photography that is so often overlooked by other lens reviewers. Thank you for adding so much value to the photography community.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you. Not everyone gets what I'm talking about.

[@DAVCOHGRAPH]

@@DustinAbbottTWI i certainly do and i am glad there is somebody else out there sharing the same views and appreciating the points that really matter in contrast to the "technicians". thank you very much!

[@dmisha5437]

Who puts these dislikes, why? Thank you Dustin for your work, every video is complete and perfect!

[@anthonyc1883]

I’ve often wondered the same, and perhaps people sometimes vote down because of the product and not because of the presentation. Even though the product here seems highly regarded by Dustin, perhaps some people don’t care for it, the manufacturer, or whatever.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There are a couple of people that always visit to downvote. Some might have some personal animus towards me, and there are a few people who know that I am a pastor and hate Christianity. I think it has more to do with their dislike for me personally and little to do with the product or presentation.

[@torbenlysholm1]

​@@DustinAbbottTWI I'm, an atheist and I must say that apart from the occasional appearance of the bible/other literature in a book case, a cross or whatever in shots here and there, you really don't make very much out of that aspect of your life here. So for someone actively working in the field of "spreading the good word", you're certainly not pushing anything on anyone here. And as someone who usually picks up on such things, I'll say that anyone with a grudge against you would have to be kind of anti-christianity as you say, or anti-all religion in all aspects to feel provoked by anything on this channel. All the rest of us are totally with you here and just love your approach to these things unbiased by brands or prices. In fact, I can't believe you "only" have 70k followers. We gotta do something about that.😁

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks, Torben. There's a big difference between someone who holds different views and someone who actively seeks to destroy those with opposing views. Most people fall into the former category, fortunately. And yes, I'm not trying to use this channel to promote my faith. I would hope that it flows naturally through my life rather than being forced into people's faces.

[@Ava-wu4qp]

@@DustinAbbottTWI "... Know that I am a pastor and hate Christianity." I read that completely backwards and was momentarily really curious how you made that work. Haha.... I am not religious/spiritual, myself but to each their own. I can definitely appreciate your ability to separate 'church from state,' as some would put it.

[@Blumis2000]

Dustin, I have to say you have become my favorite lens reviewer on KZbin. I find your videos to be the perfect blend of professionalism and a feeling of a down to earth nice guy. I always get a cup of coffee and sit down and enjoy your content. Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That’s such wonderful feedback. Thank you!

[@RzaNaziri]

"Its not perfect but maybe better its for it" well said!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@JackieSemple]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I too appreciate that comment.

[@paton156]

Beautifully made review Dustin; framing, lighting, audio quality and vocal prowess is superb; you are becoming an absolute master of the KZbin kit review genre. 🙂

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's very kind. Thank you

[@Drool.]

As usual, the top reviews on KZbin. Thanks you, this is going to be my 2nd Samyang lens, right after the 85mm f/1.4 - which I absolutely love.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

They are a great pairing. I really like utilizing them together for portraits

[@Skandalista_fotograf]

I spend way too much time on YT watching reviews. When ever I need info about photo gear i just type "gear name + Dustin Abbot" its always my 1st search! Then i watch Tony & Chelsea & the rest. Jared, Kay.. Bla bla bla. Dustin reviews ARE SIMPLY THE BEST!! he covers all technical info like Tony Northup but add many other useful information, talk about artistic performance compare with other lenses. The way Dustin structure his reviews is also very convenient. Sir, you might not have 1m. followers but simply what & how you do it is second to none is the best! Thank you very much. I bought this lens 3 days ago.

[@JokiW]

@@Skandalista_fotograf Spot on, I totally agree.

[@mattreyes79]

Wow! I was checking out this lens online and decided to check out some reviews. This review by far is the best. I want to thank you for such an in depth review of the lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's my goal. I want to give people all the information to make an informed decision.

[@petecolly4036]

Dustin Abbott coming in with another heater. I'm surprised why nobody was talking about this lens. Thank you for getting after it kind sir!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@osvaldomedina173]

i bought the lens based on this review, completely happy!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's what I wanted to hear.

[@anbar5675]

Me too.

[@j16m02]

Really nice summary Dustin! We can always count on your detailed technical analysis of a lens but I really appreciate your more subjective, artistic opinion maybe even more. It's easy to get all hung up in absolute corner performance (for example) and forget what a lens is ultimately for.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Exactly. Reviews get stuck on the technical and sometimes miss the artistic.

[@ПітерАндрійХенфілдКолісник]

Hello from Kyiv Ukraine. I bought this lens after watching your review and it is true that the images have a real beauty to them that is difficult to describe. I revisited this review because it came up again on my recommended list and watched it again with great pleasure. I noted your comment about a little water passing between the lens mount. I found a way to overcome this a while back by accident on another lens. I did a photo shoot with a model with long hair and while we travelled between locations she would use a wide rubber band to keep her hair tidy. When we arrived at a location she would give to me the rubber band and so not to loose this I placed it over my lens at the mount. In Ukraine we have sudden storms that can last a few minutes and one such came. We packed up and sat in the car. I was worried that the lens without a weather seal at the mount may have leaked a little water. I removed the rubber band and found that where the rubber band was sitting left a dry ring all round the lens mount. From that day I bought wide black rubber bands of different sizes just in case I bought other lenses without a weather proof gasket at the mount. You need to be sure there is some tightness of course but it is almost not seen when on the camera and it works for me. I leave the correct size band with the lens so it is always there. Hope that helps you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Interesting feedback. I can see what you describe working.

[@Clemme]

I love the composition and lightning in your interview shots.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you.

[@afgh1408]

FYI this video is still helping people like me, thanks for how thorough it is.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@delpierro0815]

Thanks for the review and I absolutely agree - this lens has character. I was really surprised by the unique photos that came out of this tiny full frame lens. I might use it as the only lens I bring to my next trip. One of the best channels I discovered this year by the way, always high quality analysis.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a really surprising lens.

[@ReelLightPictures]

What a fantastically thorough and unbiased review! You hit upon a lot of the aspects of what I look for in a review when I'm researching a product, without hyperbole. Thanks for taking the time. {Subscribed!}

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's great to hear. That's what I strive for.

[@Sunrazor]

I love that you bring the rendering up. Thinking about getting this lens but was put off a bit by another review regarding edge sharpness. But there is more to it. The images you show really brings out some form of soft 3D feel. Much like some of my old Takumar lenses. So you got me. I am getting it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful! This is actually a very sharp lens, so I'm not sure why someone knocked it.

[@vladepast4936]

I do not subscribe to your channel but have to tell you that your review is very professional, just right and up to the point details, no junk information. Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to hear the positive feedback...so go ahead and subscribe!

[@gtxSeries]

Thanks for the review, Dustin! I've been looking for THE standard (AF) lens for my camera and I found your review the most convincing. This undefinable character is just what I'm after.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It has continued to be a favorite for me.

[@icegeeable]

The sample photos are all amazingly taken. Thanks very much for the review :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@araiso8672]

I had this lens and it really is a wonderful gems.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is.

[@dennischapin]

Thanks Dustin for the thorough review. I have been a Nikon shooter since 1982 and I recently made the switch to Sony. Because of your review and B&H having the Rokinon version on sale for $299 I am going to give it a try. Thanks again, I enjoy your reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You'll enjoy the little lens. That's amazing value for money for this.

[@Vizzy285]

Purchase one yesterday for that price, should be here soon

[@johnlee669]

Thank you for your thoughtful, helpful, and most kind review of Samyang 45mm. :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@darkarnaz5708]

i'm bought it yesterday , i'm using it with my a7 , i've one thing to say , i'm impressed by the bokeh and the solid performance of sharpness , and great review thank you !!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Great to hear!

[@MJAdams-js7np]

Thanks! You’re my first stop for all comprehensive lens and gear reviews. Cheers!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to hear it!

[@f2.0]

I agree with you wholeheartedly. This little gem has a permanent place in my travel kit along with the Samyang 18mm FE.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm looking at the 18mm shortly.

[@f2.0]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I look forward to that. I will be very interested in how you feel it compares to the only other 18mm offering in FE.

[@belgiboing]

Thanks for the review. I'm very pleased in general that 3rd party lens manufacturers are now coming up with compact lenses for full frame mirrorless. This Samyang seems great! I've recently switched to L-mount (Leica SL) from Sony. While Samyang doesn't support that mount (yet), there is the Sigma 45mm f/2.8 for both the E-mount and L-mount and it's a wonderfully useful lens. With today's high ISO performances, I'm not bothered at all with the 2.8 max aperture. I think you will like how small it is, how close it focuses and that it is weather sealed. The ideal everyday lens for me.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm starting my review of that lens at the moment.

[@adamthirtle3051]

Great review, exactly the information I was looking for. Just bought this lens to replace my Sony 50mm 1.8 straight after watching.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think it is a great replacement.

[@vladoh2011]

I bought it as a replacement for Sony 50/1.8 as soon as it was released. My only reason was to save the travel bulk. Performance is wholly unexpected bonus. Did not expect much from Samyang. Now I will look at their other lenses.

[@justinphillips3]

Without a doubt my favourite camera/ lens reviewer! Amazing videos, thanks so much!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure! Thank you for the nice feedback.

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

Was 10:28 shot wide open? If yes, I think the sharpness is sufficient for most applications.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes it was, and I agree.

[@instantesnet]

Maybe my question is silly but, how does it compare to the Sony 50mm 1.8? Thanks for your great reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Much better AF, much nicer rendering and feel to images. Probably only mildly sharper.

[@thscful]

@@DustinAbbottTWI How does it compare to the 55 1.8 wrt sharpness? You stated that AF is similar, but wide open, is the sharpness similar, or significantly different? I expect the 55 is probably better, but how big of a margin is it? Your images and tests look great at 1.8, but some other tests I've seen at 1.8 are unimpressive. I wonder if there's huge copy variation.

[@ktk0358]

Trust me, you are happier with Samyang... Faster and more accurate focus and way less noisy!

[@OccultDemonCassette]

I've been going back and forth on whether I want to purchase the Tamron 28-75mm zoom lens, or if I want to go for 3 Compact Samyang AF lenses (The 24mm, 45mm and 75mm). I'm thinking I might go with buying the 3 used Samyang primes for less than 700 all together. I have tons of vintage lenses that I use currently, but I'm want to get something modern with AF.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The good news is that there is no bad choice there. I own all these lenses save the Samyang 24mm, and I like all of them.

[@skyrunr]

Thank you for this review, this lens is exactly what I'm looking for, and it is currently on sale at Samyang's website 02/2023. It balances out what the major manufacturers seem to be missing. They only want to make small/light/cheap compromised lenses or large/heavy/expensive lenses.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I agree. This one is a little gem.

[@karographixphotography7811]

Excellent commentary, These slightly compromised lenses in creative hands brings back the ansel adams in all of us. I also use a lot of zeiss, but for creative work these budget lenses are great. I also use a lot of y/c lenses via adapters for exactly for the reasons you mentioned. Great review! Keep it up!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the feedback.

[@JessDemant]

I also love this lens (and also the Samyang FE 24mm.f.2.8), and thanks for a great review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@AJCoReTV]

I just snagged the 24mm 2.8 for $189!

[@ktk0358]

This is the Harry Potter of lenses, truly. For the 300 bucks it pulls the tricks x2 x3 lenses can do... And it has character which many of these 35-50mm actually lack. This lens grows on you, I got as the "doesn't really matter" travel/holiday lens and now it's kind of my favorite for the compact versatility it brings in at VERY light weight anywhere. Most folks don't believe I didn't use my 40mm Batis instead. Nice review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I agree. I really love this lens, and it seems even better on my 50MP Alpha 1.

[@ktk0358]

@@DustinAbbottTWI the 75mm is also very nice lens. Samyang is putting very convincing casual tech out now and raising the bar every quarter. A1... surely nice to carry such a body around!! :-) I'm on the 7IV train... and waiting what seems to be forever!

[@gitithadani]

As of ever a very differentiated & accurate review. I have a collection of vintage lenses - particularly in the50-58mm range & never felt the need for paying a huge amount of money & weight for a modern lens just for corner to corner sharpness which anyway is not an issue if one wants subject isolation - then it is much more important the rendering at different f stops & the kinds of gradations one gets. Lens drawing was conceptualized on very different parameters combining both artistic & optical preciseness. During the slr film days the 50/1.8 was one of the cheapest lenses & nikon even made a very lightweight pancake style lens. MFD was around 45-50mm & I think that has not changed much. The zeiss planar if I am not mistaken is also around 45mm. The sonnar which was traditionally their more artistic design has an mfd at about - 0.9 so much more. The exceptions that I know of is the meyeroptik/pentacon at33mm&the later zeiss 2.8 version. The samyang lens - as you have so aptly illustrated combines the artistic&fine precision + gives a great balance of classic & modern in a small form factor thatreally suits the mirrorless. I too have fallen in love with this lens!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's nice when a modern lensmaker hits the fine balance that some of us love about some vintage lenses.

[@gitithadani]

@@DustinAbbottTWI - exactly and that the modern internalizes and thereby evolves its classical traditions into a fine minimal design.

[@jaimejrking]

I'm sold my sigma art 50 1.4 after trying the 45 1.8, the only thing I'm missing is the minimum focus distance but the less is faster and ultra ligther! Love it!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Nice. Yes, the MFD isn't great on the 45mm, but otherwise it's pretty much a delight to use.

[@dannyklesh]

Funny you say this because I loved my Tamron 45 and the 50 is little to tight for weddings for me and have been looking for something a little closer to 35

[@davidburton2294]

Looks like a nice lens with a unique character. Samyang are really ahead of the curve with their lens designs and ease of use. Carrying less weight around really makes photography fun!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed all around.

[@nckfy]

Some absolutely beautiful visuals on this review, very impressed.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@AnirbanBanerjee]

Thanks to Dustin for the review. Have been using this for the last couple of months, my copy is very sharp from f2-f2.2. Bokeh is wonderfully creamy at closer distances. Only con is the slower than Sony native af speed, but the lens is not entirely unusable at shooting action. Love the fact that it is much lighter and smaller than my sigma 35mm dg dn 1.4 and the resolution is surprising for an optic of this size, would highly recommend.

[@marknathan7744]

Great little lens this Dustin , I would love to see a MK2 version of this with more features IE focus hold button and mf/af switch also a 58mm filter thread to match there 24&35mm offerings . Great review as always

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Good news: check out this page: www.samyanglens.com/en/product/v-af.php

[@michaelweichhardt]

Gaussian lens design is desirable for creative shooting :) - the edges of this build are always softer - physical limitation - or call it feature :) - make the aperture smaller to cut off the soft edges to some extend if you need to.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do like the rendering from this lens. It's nice.

[@michaelweichhardt]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I had the lens for a while but then preferred the SLR Magic Micro Prime 50mm T1.2 - I am aware that's a whole different beast - but if I go for a retro look that's my go-to lens. I wanted to like the 45mm - the minimal focus distance was really limiting for my use.

[@styx85]

Thanks for the excellent review! I think I just found my next walkaround lens :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is a sweet little one.

[@RogerOThornhill]

Follow up: Bought the lens through your link (and the 85mm Samyang too, also thanks to your review) , lenses arrive on Monday! Thanks again:)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks all around. Enjoy!

[@dannyjang9952]

I’m sold. Thanks for the great review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out!

[@surrogatemarker]

I come to your channel for excellent technical (approaching the point of clinical) reviews.. but when you describe a lens as having a soul and image character that is often absent in modern lenses and supports the most modern autofocus technology from Sony available today.. it’s clear this is a very special little lens

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think it is. And frankly a lot of modern lenses are fairly clinical.

[@MrJAM-np7go]

I like the approach of lesser lenses of Samyang. They're relatively slow, not bitingly sharp, but they're handy, light and inexpensive. These are rare virtues nowadays. Samyang released their new 18mm F2.8 and I want to know how good that would be. UWA primes are harder to make, so it will show how mature Samyang is as a lens manufacterer.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do have hopes for the 18mm since Samyang have shown themselves capable of making good wide angle lenses.

[@The_CGA]

The look of this (the "magic rendering")...reminds me a lot of my rokkor-X. which is also easy to pocket.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There's something about certain lenses.

[@GilbertTV]

thank you Dustin for another fine review ... Im with you ..i love this lens ...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

For sure!

[@michalm9199]

As day to day lens and travel lens would you go with Samyang 45mm or tamron 28-75? Currently I have Tamron for home demo and seems that these lens are adding weight if I am shooting full body portraits and these lens have a lot of distortion which I am not sure I will be ok with ...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The zoom is more versatile, obviously, but I do like the 45mm focal length for a lot of things. If small and light is what you want, this is probably a high priority option for you.

[@dannyklesh]

Dustin. I loved the Tamron 45 as it could do everything. Also rendered well. Now I shoot with the 50 art and with weddings sometimes I find it a little too contricting. How would you compare the 2. You seem like you love this lens

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like this lens for a lot of the same reasons (other than close focus).

[@dannyklesh]

Dustin Abbott I’ve really been stuck lately with wondering if I should keep my 50 art e mount as I only have 3 more days till my return period runs out. Between 35 and s 50 because I plan on getting the 105 for long range stuff I need something relatively short

[@morrieglick4137]

Thank you for another enjoyable, impartial review. If money is not a factor which lens would you choose between this Samyang & the Battis 55 (Assuming you don’t have either) & why? Thank you in advance for your response.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There isn't a Batis 55mm, so I presume you're talking about the Sony/Zeiss 55mm F1.8. I personally would choose the Samyang because I prefer the "look" of images from it and see no reason to spend more than twice as much for the 55mm

[@morrieglick4137]

Thanks for clarification & such a quick response. Keep up your excellent work.

[@DoubleB13]

Great review Dustin. How would you say this compare to the Sony 50mm 2.5? Tossing between the two. 🙏

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a tough call. The Sony is much nicer in terms of build, but the Samyang has the wider maximum aperture and really nice image quality. I'd probably lean Sony overall, particularly if you didn't have a huge difference in price.

[@johnjacquard863]

i got this and the 75mm 1.8 because of your excellent reviews

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm glad you are enjoying them.

[@johnjacquard863]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I really appreciate what you are doing. i love the 45mm and 75mm samyang. i was wondering if you could make a recommendation for a wider lens that somewhat similar to the 45mm samyang in that character but decent sharpness aspect? i did get the tamron 20mm 2.8 based on your video, i just feel like i need something else wide for vlog and landscape. i cant make up my mind. ive thjought about the samyang 14mm i thought about the sony 24mm 1.4 (although that price is difficult for me) ive looked at many lens between 15mm to 24mm but not sure.

[@johnjacquard863]

i almost feel like i value microcontrast more than anything .

[@Bernard-ux2eb]

This and the 24mm and 75mm. I have the 45, just trying to decide whether to sell the Carl Zeiss Distagon 2.8/21, the Distagon 2/35, Planar 1.4/85 and Tomioka Cosina 1.2/55 (all adapted to A7RIII) and just have the Samyangs instead. If I do, I'll have gone from around 50 kilos of kit down to around 5 kilos. Less is more.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's pretty amazing, isn't it

[@Bernard-ux2eb]

@@DustinAbbottTWI It's cheap. That, right now, is amazing. Sold all the Pentax and other gear, £9,000 in resale, all gone. This left enough to, A. Slim the kit down to super lightweight (A7RIII and a few lenses); and B. Pay a tax bill, maybe. Not sure I'm willing to fund tyranny anymore. 🤔

[@Ni5ei]

Thanks for the great review. It's actually weird I still haven't bought a "standard" lens for my A7RII yet. I would've bought the Sony 55mm 1.8 Zeiss if it was 50mm but I find its fov is a tad too tight for me. The Sony 50mm 1.8 turns me off because of its loud AF motor and not so great overall AF performance. So Dustin, if you had to choose between the 55mm 1.8 Zeiss or the 45mm 1.8 Samyang, which one would you choose?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would choose the Samyang, actually. I like the focal length and feel like the images have more "character" to them. It's also a much more reasonable price relative to performance.

[@Stasiek_Zabojca]

I heard that Sony 50 f/1.8 got firmware update to V.03, which improves AF by A LOT. There are few reviews. But still, Samyang seem to be far better, but a little bit more expensive(which is understandable).

[@AlfonsoSalgueiroLora]

Thanks so much for your great review, I always trust them as impartial and detailed

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's my goal

[@AlfonsoSalgueiroLora]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Unfortunately I don't live in the US so I couldn't use your affiliate links to buy this lens. Looking forward to using this Samyang lens, thanks again.

[@SuperBuickregal]

Thanks again for the info and honest facts.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome, Thomas

[@rcpanorama]

Dustin, if money is not an issue, which would you recommend? This Samyang 45mm F1.8 or the Sony 40mm F2.5, I will get only one!!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I personally would go for the Samyang (love the rendering and the faster aperture), but the Sony is nicer in terms of build.

[@JokiW]

Hi Dustin! How would you say the bokeh compares to Zeiss 55mm f1.8 in a full body portrait?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I actually like the character of the bokeh from this Samyang.

[@JokiW]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you for your reply. I have not seen any side by side comparisons of the bokeh, but I share your impression.

[@MotoTrotter]

Dear Mr Abbott, thank you for the review. You highlighted a very important point: modern lenses are too big and too anonymous. I spent months to find the right 35mm for my A7III . I wanted an f1.4 but they are all too big and even the 1.8 are quite big. I bought a Voigtlander for 40mm f1.2 (Leica mount), it has character and it’s small! But to use it on the A7 with autofocus I bought the Techart adapter while I prefer non-adapted lens. Did you ever think to try them? There is also a manual version FE mount (but it’s different).

[@Ava-wu4qp]

While still no AF, I'm surprised you didn't take a look at Voightlander's native Sony 35/40mm options. I guess you need that adapter if AF is one of your higher priorities.

[@MotoTrotter]

@@Ava-wu4qp Exactly. During street photography sometimes i quickly look to the display for the composition or even i don't look at all. Regarding the 40mm f/1.2, the FE version is also bigger and mechanically different.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've tested a number of Voigtlander lenses, but they are pretty niche. I try to cover at least one a year, but not much more than that.

[@mblapsiwala]

How is the rendering and overall look of Samyang 45 1.8 as compared to Sony Zeiss 50 1.4? Which one do you personally prefer for personal and professional use? I take your verdict as final as you have so much detailed experience with so many glasses... Thanks in advance and appreciate your time behind research and work!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Both lenses have different strengths. I love the punch of the Zony 1.4/50, but the Samyang has beautifully unique rendering, is inexpensive, and so compact. I currently own them both, so I didn't really choose between them.

[@davecurtis8833]

Great review Dustin. Will you be adding it to your kit.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I am, actually. I find the size very handy and I love lenses that can give me images that "spark joy" for me.

[@NinhNguyen2]

sold. I ordered one on black friday from adorama

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy

[@officialtiimo]

Does f2 fix a lot of the sharp cat eye effect? Obviously highlights won't be completely round by then but I'm hoping it will take away some of the bite of the sharp edges of the cat eyes.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It helps, but F2.8 is going to be a better aperture if that is a priority.

[@officialtiimo]

@@DustinAbbottTWI hmm that makes sense but at that point I might just be better off buying the Sigma 45.

[@powerlurker]

consider the price and the weight， it might be the best all arounder standard lens on FE mount

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's definitely a contender. It's just fun to use, period.

[@ronp4529]

Just became interested in this lens and browsed through the comments, lots of folks wanting to know how it stacks against the Zeiss 55 and the Sony 50, but I’m curious how you think it compares to another low element design known for its rendering - the Loxia 50. You’ve captured some beautiful images with both lenses and the secondhand price of the Loxia has really come down; is the Samyang absolutely outclassed, or can it hang with a used Zeiss at half the price?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Good question. The Zeiss has a much nicer build quality, but I'm not sure the Samyang gives up anything optically save perhaps color fidelity (Samyang glass tends to be a little warm)

[@wickedninja8599]

Really in depth review. I decided to buy this. Also I like your name LOL.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmmm, I wonder why? :)

[@wickedninja8599]

@@DustinAbbottTWI LOL

[@officialtiimo]

What are your thoughts about this lens vs the 55mm f1.8 Sony Zeiss? Seems like in some ways they share a lot of qualities.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I actually like this lens a bit better (particularly for the price). I like the overall rendering better.

[@officialtiimo]

@@DustinAbbottTWI good to know, thanks!

[@stacey7406]

Does this lens come sharp right out the box? Or do you have to order the dock also.? I have the sony A73.Also I'm a food photographer. Is this not good because of the minimum focus distancing and the 1.12 ? Very the tamron 45mm ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

With mirrorless there is no need for microadjusting focus, so they are sharp and accurate right out of the box. But no, this lens does not have a great level of magnification for food photography.

[@stacey7406]

@@DustinAbbottTWI hey Dustin can I ask you do you know of a adapter that can be used with this lens to get autofocus and exif meta data.

[@rustamhaydarov5403]

Best Review, Thank you very much!!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@rohankhode6228]

Nice review 👍 can you please compare to zeiss 40mm f2 & sigma 45 f2.8

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've already thoroughly reviewed the Zeiss (search on my channel) and just started the Sigma review.

[@AaronBarbosa]

Ordered mine 🙌🏾

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You'll enjoy it.

[@olegvorkunov5400]

As of now on firmware version 2 I do not have a good experience with this lens under continuous autofocus. Awaiting lens station to update the firmware to version 6. Also disappointed with the motor noise. It is pretty noticeable and at first, I thought that lens was broken.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My copy of this lens is very quiet in focusing and is extremely reliable.

[@olegvorkunov5400]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Here is a test video with motor noise: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZPIdJhmmMuZl6c. I wonder if you have lesser noise, then I would have to replace my lens.

[@GregorMima]

Sounds like a good lens, even for crop / a6000 series. Wonder how good it compares to the Sigma 56mm on crop ... From your pictures i like Samyangs bookeh compared to Sigma.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Sigma would be sharper, and the Samyang will have the nicer bokeh/rendering.

[@Old_Man_Jay]

Thanks to this review and a few others I've watched, I will soon buy this lens. I'm a huge fan of samyang lenses

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@johnniebao6163]

Nice review, very useful. I've got a question here, I've ready own a tamron 35 2.8 and really love it's image quality especially its macro capability although the autofocus is kinda terrible. Would u still get this samyang 45 1.8 only because of its bigger aperture? Many thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do own both 35mm and 45mm lenses, so I do think they have a different application, though I would suggest starting with greater separation between your focal lengths and adding the closer focal lengths like this if necessary.

[@johnniebao6163]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks very much for your reply. I think I know what to do now. Great work.

[@aloi]

Initial reports mentioned some issues with failing to focus at infinity; Samyang did issue a firmware update afterwards that supposedly fixed the issue. I take that you haven't experienced the above issue?

[@aloi]

Nice review as always, by the way.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I didn't, but my review copy was updated to the latest firmware.

[@KrzysPalacz]

i would buy 45mm and 85 for weddings but what wide angle should i get? i love 35mms but with 45mm it seems useless to have 2 lenses that close :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you want to stick with Samyang, their 18mm F2.8 is a nice companion to this lens.

[@enriquebuil3064]

Dustin, after your evaluation, did you add this lens to your bag?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did. I'm a fan of the little guy.

[@joshblank1]

Dustin, looking at Samyang 45 vs 50 1.4 AF. Never shot 45 before, but I love tight 50. Looking for color rendering, dreamy style, buttery bokeh, solid AF for toddler. Which do you recommend?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like the 45mm much better than the 50mm Samyang. The 1.4/50 has much poorer AF, less contrast and sharpness, but does have nice bokeh.

[@joshblank1]

Will be ordering the 45 asap! The 50 is tempting though because it’s on sale for $399, that dreamy bokeh, and not sure if the firmware updates have helped with AF. Thanks Dustin

[@Director414]

What autofocus speed are you using in this clip? Fast or normal? Thanks. Amazing review btw :) Are the sony lenses even smoother in continous auto focus mode? I´m looking to use it for video work

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Eric. This is just normal. As for Sony lenses - it depends on the lens. Some are a tiny bit smoother (barely); some are worse.

[@Director414]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks

[@JackieSemple]

Excellent review that tells us what we need to know. Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@LarissaPassos]

Dustin, if you had to choose between the samyang 35mm 1.4 AF vs the samyang 45mm 1.8 AF as a general purpose budget lens, which one would be your choice? Or neither? Have any suggestions?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would probably go with the 45mm. It's a lot smaller, has faster, smoother AF, and I think the images have a special quality to them.

[@ianbrown704]

Brilliant review, my A7R IV arrives tomorrow and so (just ordered this lens via your link below) looking fwd to pairing them up, thanks again for all your your reviews. Honest and Comprehensive and you set the bar high. Regards Ian

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the nice feedback. Enjoy your camera...and your new lens.

[@cynhinfaheinz]

Is there a built in profile of samyang lenses incase I want to shoot in jpg and want to have correction directly from the camera?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

JPEGs are corrected; RAWs don't have any embedded profiling.

[@danncorbit3623]

A very interesting review I agree that the images are very pleasant. This sort of thing is every bit as important as clinical dxomark analysis, and perhaps a little bit more..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I completely agree. We don't take pictures in a lab; we photograph real things!

[@maheshg212]

Hi Dustin, will you be reviewing the new Sony 35/1.8 FE as well? That would be really great, especially comparing (by memory or directly) with either loxia 35 and/or thisn samyang lens, though the angle of view is slightly different.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do plan to review it, though I'm kind of at the whim of Sony as to when they will get me a loaner.

[@maheshg212]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks Dustin. I am receiving this tomorrow in fact. But without your review (as you have reviewed Loxia), I will be wondering if I made the right decision. However Loxia gets better only from f2.8 from the contrast comparison picture on your site. Then there is that small Sony 35/2.8

[@ChiaraBizzarraGiovanelli]

Dear Dustin, do you think these little samyang lenses could be used for professional stuff? (like portraits, weddings, ecc?) Thank you! :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't see why not. I've seen photographers at weddings using nifty-fifties, and this lens is better than any of those that I've tested.

[@ChiaraBizzarraGiovanelli]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you very much, I think I'll grab it! :)

[@vincecraig8367]

I really want to buy this lens but the fact that I need a docking station to update the firmware makes it more than 100 dollars more than the sony 50mm. Did you have to update the firmware? I just purchased a Sony a7iii camera.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Vince, at this point most of the firmware updates have probably been applied to lenses currently at retail, so you probably could get away without one.

[@nsbhagwat]

Nice review, question - will this lens work without a hitch on A6300?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes it will

[@senthilrajac8596]

Dustin I tested 45mm 1.8 with a week, I felt it's not sharp @1.8 like my Sony 85mm 1.8, from f 2.2 samyang getting sharpness, Should I keep this or return it and buy the sony FE 35mm 1.8? Or samyang 35mm 1.8

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My experience is that 50mm(ish) lenses are rarely as absolutely sharp as 85mm lenses. Do you like the overall look of images from it? I quite like the 45mm

[@alessandro.corradini]

Hi Dustin, Can you make some videos on mc11 with canon telephoto lenses such as 70-200LII/III, 300 2.8LII and so on? Into the web/youtube there are few resources about that and the most ones are old and outdated because there have been several updates on MC11. I''m interested about the tracking capabilities in afc. Thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Alessandro, well I don’t have time to do more such MC 11 reviews, I will tell you that I don’t think adapted telephoto lenses are adequate replacements for native glass on Sony

[@SamirJabarov]

Hi Dustin, is there huge differences compared samyang 45mm to sony 50mm f1.4 planar in terms of sharpness, focus accuracy and bokeh quality?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would not say huge differences, no. The Planar is sharper (particularly in the corners) and has nicer bokeh (and definitely higher microcontrast), but the AF is actually faster and quieter on the little Samyang. It's a lot of bang for the buck even it isn't as exceptional in every optical category.

[@amitkrupal1234]

2nd time i have heard the word "clinical" . Sir i appreciate your views. They are exactly what comes to our mind while watching the result of this testing of lenses. I really like the rendering of this 45 f/1.8 & Samyang's AF 85 f/1.4 FE. Currently are this 2 lenses available only for Sony?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

No, Samyang has a bunch of FE lenses now. Other standouts include the 75mm F1.8, the 18mm F2.8, and 35mm F1.8 in this series.

[@serxfreerun2417]

Awesome video Sir!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks!

[@micr75i]

hi, if money was no object and weight was not a concern would you buy this lens or the 50/1.4? Would you say that the 50/1.4 also suffers from over correction of optical defects and thus lacks character or not? I have a Zeiss 40/2.0 but I don’t think the eye af works well and I want to sell it :) thanks for the fantastic work you do!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Michele - I actually think the Planar renders quite well, though it is a little more punchy. It's probably the best balanced 50mm option I've used thus far.

[@pedromendonca2963]

Have you updated the firmware of the Batis 40mm? Do you think this Samyang is better than the Batis?

[@micr75i]

@@pedromendonca2963 yes I have updated the firmware. If you google "philip reeve batis 40" you will find a review with the updated firmware. In short, with aperture larger than 2.8 and distance less than 65cm, the Eye AF still fails on this lens, even with the updated firmware. Might not be a problem for most people as all you have to do is to close it to 2.8 but then really you have to consider it a 2.8 lens, which isn't great.

[@Soundwave857]

how does it compare to the sony 50mm 1.8 for half the price of the samyang 45 1.8?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Samyang is much more refined and produces much better images.

[@Aurilash]

Hi Dustin, first of all thank you very much for all your great reviews. I wanted to ask you, what are your thoughts on comparing this 45mm 1.8 vs the samyang 50mm 1.4? I'm cross-buying these lenses, as I'm looking for a 50ish lens that's not as expensive Thank you in advance!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like this one a lot better. The 50mm has nice bokeh, but is soft and higher CA.

[@Aurilash]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you so much for the reply! If I may bother you again, how would you rate the current lineup of Samyang AF lenses for Sony e-mount? I now know you would put the 45mm above the 50mm, how does the 85 stack up to these? Have you tried the 35mm? I do not remember if you have already done a review on those. Thanks in advance!