Sarva Dharma Sambhav (Are all Religions the Same ?) - Dr. David Frawley - India Inspires Talks

[@JagbirSingh]

Simply wonderful

[@kianchristoffern]

Amazing talk! This series of talks by allround amazing being, Guruji & Dr Frawley - is a prime example of the kind of clarity that can only bring understanding and wellbeing among people More Frawley for the Wörld, surely needed

[@mahendraprajapati1493]

We need more of this kind of lectures. To reignite the confidence and pround of being Hindus. and above let's not fall for anti-nationals who are bent on destroying India.

[@DHARMYOGCOM]

All religions are not same. However we should agree to have mutual respect for each other. This is what Hinduism teaches.

[@supriyasharma8538]

just like people even religion can become a better version of themselves without harming others

[@5eek3r0fknowl3dg3]

At the same time accept the majority of you are mushrikeen/polythiests and totally in the wrong! It's culture not faith for most Hindus n even the copycat ft. Sikhs

[@sureshpolali4616]

This is divine. Young mind should be exposed to this. All ills will vanish. Great work. Thanks sir

[@arishsahani]

Let all understand all religions are not same. Only Hinduism teaches all human how to live like Human .

[@halaayudha]

two cows. one indian ,one a foreign breed. one says amba, the other says moo , though both give milk the former gives less in quantity and yet can be called amrit ( now they call it A2 milk). the later gives good quantity of milk which is of inferior quality ( A1 milk). one is revered . other was killed in their lands for meat. later , just as they claim that all religions are one and the same, they said all cows are same but promoted their cows because they gave more quantity of milk and killed our cows for meat. quality was not important but quantity was. now after arrival of heart diseases ,diabetes and other diseases due to intake of such milk one understood the importance of the indian cow. now they know that it is now just milk , but its urine and dung are also very useful ( rediscovered what our elders have been telling us since ages). Indians must therefore watchout when a foreigner says ' all religions are same' because he might be doing it to promote his own religion on the sly.

[@shubhammeena5177]

You are not a Hindu if you say this.

[@amannoobs]

Arish Sahani hindu dharma, jain sikh and buddhist all teach the same

[@vishnuacharya6352]

Excellent as ever! I have yet to hear a hear clearer exposition of correct syntax, depth of historical understanding and words coming from experience! The Shakti behind this rather unorthodox Shiva (in silvery hair). Thank you sir for your becoming!

[@Mahesh-rb8xf]

Sanatana Dharma and its branches empowers and teaches what great privilege being human is. Others just fear god and lacks intellectual concepts/teachings. Most people think Hinduism is illogical but in reality it's the other way around..

[@Deepa0309]

I bow down to you master...I am overwhelmed..I don't know why I am filled with emotion.

[@porchelviramr4404]

Great satsang! Understandable simple language of Frawley Iyya is commendable. The true Dharmic soul. Bow to your Impeccable Gnana Iyya! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@IamrajTheIndian-eg2jt]

Details of Dharma told with Amazing clarity Hats off to you Guruji🙏🙏🙏🙏 I am ashamed of knowing the greatness of own heritage and tradition so late in life amd also from an expert coming outside from my own motherland Thank you again for reminding our great roots again 🙏🙏🙏

[@lajwantishahani1225]

This video needs to be seen by far more people across India and globally 🙏

[@ganesanr5398]

Guruji,by your wonderful lecture you have shown like in the tradition of Hindu Dharma the necessity of unity of making all the people realised about self.As an Indian I feel proud of your explanatory lecture.I fall on your feet for making me understanding enlightenment which is beyond your temporal living.Like uncertainty principle the more you bind yourself to limitation,the less you understand limitlessness though limitation is required to a certain degree to reach the threshold of understanding limitlessness.Thank you.A wonderful lecture indeed.

[@aryanyadav3690]

In Hinduism it's already said "All are One" 😘 Finally you explained beautiful sir 🙏🏻

[@rajatchauhan8802]

Beautifully dissected the concept of religion and Dharma.

[@venkataramamuthuswami]

Commendable effort to understand the ancient wisdom of Rishis.This effort has to continue as long as the last human intelligence exists, even than we will be in awe!So, the seeking should continue to unravel truth from ......

[@atlantivi]

Mr Frawley, thanks for a wonderful explanation.

[@yavdhesh]

It is great honour for us to have you listened.

[@johnwilly467]

great sir, u understood universal truth and making other understand.

[@elgringo81]

In the beginning process of feeling unity, this is a great lecture that shines clarity on what is going on. This video is a fantastic part of technology, when electronics and binary is capable of expansion and deeper understanding of higher self. We keep on searching.

[@revolutionist2468]

Wonderful explanation Guruji... Pronam🙏 from 🇧🇩

[@MrWarriorspirit]

It can be explained better. Dharma in the Indian context refers to Dharmic religions Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism. They are all Moksha-marga, that is they all accept as their core belief that the aim of life is liberation from the cycle of birth and rebirth. This presupposes beliefs in other Dharmic doctrines too like law of karma, reincarnation, the existence of a transmigrating spirit form. The differ only on interpretations on ultimate reality, but when it comes to practices they largely agree with one another and all prescribe some form of Yoga as a means to liberation. Of course none of these are accepted doctrine and practices of Abrahamic religion, in fact they are the total opposite, thus from the perspective of Dharmic religions, they are adharmic.

[@indianmilitary]

Jan Martin Ulvåg ????

[@jamesstevenson7725]

You explained this well MrWarriorspirit

[@jamesstevenson7725]

@@dharmashekhar1047 Good point

[@jamesstevenson7725]

@@dharmashekhar1047 Very interesting. The Dharmic teachings are so much better than the Adharmic ( Abrahamic) ones. It is frustrating when western academics distort the teachings and history of the Dharmic traditions.

[@santanukumaracharya3467]

The difference between Dharma and Religion is perfectly explained that is usually obliterated by the intellectuals and vested interests like the politicians and the missionaries. We are thankful to the speaker for his intellectual honesty and integrity.

[@Hallo-c1s]

Great sir

[@drege8510]

Namaste Pranaam dhanyavaad ereshva

[@ugc1784]

One doesn't necessarily have to be an indian preacher for that Dharmik, Adhyatmik and related spiritual discourse. One by birth not an indian can deliver it comprehensively. Thanks for expressing your thoughts Sir. Dr. Frawley.

[@Hiimanshushekhaarnayak]

oh wow ... great job... Thank You Group

[@jagubarot]

Sarva Dharma Sambhav. Agree, excluding Sarva cults.

[@sochbadlodeshbadlo4639]

True yogi. Very true knowledge.

[@premprakashjauhari2751]

Very good and informative talk on the subject. Very good analysis of Sanatan Vedic Dharma.

[@johnwilly467]

Sir, require your preaching to all Christian and come to vedichindu

[@dayanand8919]

Very very nice & Divine. Thank you Vamdev Shashtri. Once there was only one Faith of Humanity, " Omnipresent Eternal Faith of Arya Vedic Sanatan Dharma ", others are manufactured and one is an Invaders cult. Hare Krishna, Hare Rama. SHIVOHUM SHIVOHAM.

[@anandbm7715]

PROFOUND EXPLANATION. THANKYOU SIR!

[@gora876]

Sarva Dharman Parityajya Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja Sri Krishna - Bhagavad Gita. Chapter 18, verse 66.

[@indianmilitary]

but dharma is NOT religion. The closest culture to dharma or laws of nature is sanathana dharma culture or hindu (ism??). But Jainism, Buddhism and Sikkhism are just distortions of sanathana dharma culture because some power hungry fellows wanted to form their own cult within India,. All this happened after kaliyuga started (4000 BC). Abrahamic religions which came much later (outside india) in the kaliyuga are the worst distortions of sanathana dharma culture. Communism and hedonism are even worse. So called modern hindus love their hedonistic lifestyle. We have to live comfortably even if we have to take a personal loan. So called charvaka philosophy was a fake philosophy added to the long list of hindu philosophies by East India company thugs who own most banks in the world. Now you see the connection. !! India is suffering from five ugly sisters - Judaism (In the form of greedy corporates and banks), Christianity, Islam, Communism and Hedonism.

[@jaiku99]

Very clear thoughts , very well articulated.

[@jeevakannadarajah5868]

Thank you and very nice topic

[@halaayudha]

two cows. one indian ,one a foreign breed. one says amba, the other says moo , though both give milk the former gives less in quantity and yet can be called amrit ( now they call it A2 milk). the later gives good quantity of milk which is of inferior quality ( A1 milk). one is revered . other was killed in their lands for meat. later , just as they claim that all religions are one and the same ,they said all cows are same but promoted their cows because they gave more quantity of milk and killed our cows for meat. quality was not important but quantity was. now after arrival of heart diseases ,diabetes and other diseases due to intake of such milk one understood the importance of the indian cow. now they know that it is now just milk , but even its urine and dung are also very useful ( rediscovered what our elders have been telling us since ages). Indians must therefore watchout when a foreigner says ' all religions are same' because he might be doing it to promote his own religion on the sly.

[@porchelviramr4404]

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@americandesi5703]

No, all religions are not the same, and one of the chief Hindu architects of the belief that they are all "different attempts to grasp the same Absolute Truth" was none other than the infamous Swami Vivekananda, who also declared that "if one religion is true, then all the religions are true. Therefore the Hindu religion is yours as much as mine." These kinds of attitudes are sentimental and anti-intellectual, but millions of Hindus adore Swami Vivekananda, which poses a problem if you want Hindus to think clearly on this subject.

[@MrWarriorspirit]

This is a rather unfair assessment of Swami Vivekananda. Swami Vivekananda actually considered Hinduism a superior scientific religion to other religions and had many critical things to say about Islam and Christianity and also about some practices within Hinduism. What he meant was that in all religions people have had religious/spiritual experiences or God realisations, such as Christian mystics, Islamic Sufis, Jewish mystics to Native Americans, but none other than Hindus had tried to scientifically understand and interpret these experiences. He gives an analogy all cultures have experienced rain, but not every culture understood what is the real cause of rain and explain it. Hinduism is the only religion that has scientifically explained all religious experiences and because Hinduism was universal and scientific, it was alone sanatana dharma. Other religions were driven by the same desire of man to understand the universe and their place and purpose in the universe and how they relate to it, and this is why he said all religions were paths to the absolute, but he definitely made a distinction between more primitive and advanced religions. Hinduism for him was the most advanced religion, that had offered the most scientific explanations for the universe, our place and purpose in the universe and how we relate(Atman = Brahman) He made a case for Hinduism becoming the basis for a new universal religion of the new-age, and it based on this that the new-age movement took off and ideas that are in vogue today in new age thought like a one-world religion or a global spirituality. Many mainstream writers, authors and academics have been inspired by these ideas like Aldus Huxley(Perennial philosophy) to Joseph Cambell, Alan Watts, ,Ken Wilber, George Lucas. Hinduism has indeed become the basis of new-age religion and Swami Vivekananda played a major part in this process. The idea is not to reject the experiences of other religions, but to understand them and situate them in the wider framework of Hinduism. You can explain for example an experience of oneness by a Christian or Muslim in terms of Hinduism, but not in Christian or Muslim terms. You can explain a Muslim remembering a past life in terms of Hinduism, but not in Muslim terms. But a Christian experiencing a vision of Jesus can also be explained in terms of Hinduism. Thus Hinduism is able to explain all religions.

[@americandesi5703]

MrWarriorspirit OK, well, let me just say thank you to that. Thanks for not straying from the typical neo-Hinduism script about Hinduism being the one universal religion while other religions are different paths to the same Absolute, but more primitive. The reality is that other religions are not different paths to understanding Brahman. The god of the Bible is a jealous and vicious being who has ordered his followers to commit acts of genocide against non-believers and to feel free to raid neighboring non-believers anytime they wanted slaves. The god of the Koran is a jealous and vicious being who tells his followers to lie in ambush and attack polytheists wherever they are to be found, and to keep attackig them until they submit and feel themselves subdued. You have to be out of your mind to say that these "religions" are paths to the same truth described in the Vedas. The fact of the matter is that these are man-made religions borne out of the same sectarian tribalism which mankind has been accustomed to for centuries It's contradictory to desribe Hinduism as the one scientifically oriented religion and then on the other hand to criticize Hinduism. And if you see no problem with Swami Vivekananda criticizing some practicing within Hinduism, then you should see no problem with me criticizing some beliefs within Hinduism, such as those of Swami Vivekananda and his radical universalism which has no place in the Vedas and is even contradicted by several shlokas in the purANa/itihAsa which describe non-Vedic religions in less-than-glowing terms. Swami Vivekananda is not a Vedantist and his ideas are contradicted b Vedanta. It is incorrect to see Swami Vivekananda as the spokesperson for Hinduism when his ideas are basically his own and not Vedic in origin.

[@MrWarriorspirit]

American Desi Sure, I accept that this is a Neo-Hindu interpretation by Swami Vivekananda in the light of modern thought, however it is not completely without basis in traditional Vedanta and Hindu thought either. If you may allow me, I would like to explain this to you, however to explain this I need to briefly outline Vedanta philosophy for you of Shankara(I have formally studied it under the Chinmaya Mission) and then show you how Vivekananda applies this understanding to the phenomena of world religions. Hinduism is unique in that it it attempts to understand explain the desire of living beings, with of course a focus on human beings. It recognises four main type of things humans wants in life(purusharthas): pleasure(kama) wealth(artha) career, purpose or meaning(dharma)) and finally liberation (moksha) The modern adaptation of this is Maslow's triangle(he was aware of Hindu thought) where you have physical survival the bottom of the pyramid and self-actualization at the top. This is a univeralist model to understand the desire of all humans, not just the desire of Indians, or Europeas. We can see in life that one who has plenty of pleasure, plenty of wealth, power, influence and and their dream job still feels the lack of something in their life ---- we have all heard stories of those big time CEO's of huge companies who go give it up to go off to India in search of spirituality. This what Shankara identified as the quality of "Mumkshutva" meaning a yearning for liberation of a seeker. This yearning can be weak, middling to intense. However, a seeker is unconscious of what they are seeking liberation from or indeed what is it that they are ultimately seeking, it manifests as a dispassion or distaste(vairagya) for things in the world and it awakens in one the faculty of discrimination(viveka) This discrimination itself undergoes an evolution from weak, middling to intense across various stages of intellectual development. It starts of as discrimination between what is pleasurable and what is good(priya-shreya-viveka) i.e., you realise that what is often feels pleasure for you, is not what is good for you(e.g. drugs, alcohol, sex) what is good for you is often not all that pleasure(e.g. living a simple moral virtuous life). If you pass that stage, you move to the next stage of discrimination at a more abstract level where you discriminate between that which is permanent and that which is impermanent(nitya-anitya-viveka) noting the transient nature of things in life, how things come and go stirs the intellect to inquire into the causes of things. This is the level wen you come to realise that there is something that is Absolute, the first cause, the substratum, the eternal and infinite. You may give it a name: Brahman, Shiva, Vishnu, Allah, Pemba or ONE. This is the first stage of Vedanta or Dvatia Vedanta, where you form a relationship with this Absolute. It can be a relationship of servitude, love, fatherhood, motherhood, child, friendship even enemy(see Narada Bhakti sutras). At this stage you may pray to this absolute, ask for favours or constantly talk with it . If you pass that stage, you move to the second stage of Vedanta or Visheshadvaita, where you realise that you(Atman) and that(Brahman) are intimately related, connected, part and parcel of one another. If you pass this stage you move onto you move onto the third and final(according to Vedanta) stage of discrimination between the Self and not Self(atman-anatman-viveka) That is you start to ask yourself "Who am I, where I have come from, where am I going, and what is my relationship with the absolute" The final realisation(according to Shankara) is "Tat Tvam Asi" meaning you are that or Atman = Brahman. As you may note, Shankara has thought very deeply about this and has logically delineated all stages of personal religious and spiritual evolution from the first emergence of rational thought to the final self-realization or enlightenment. This does not happen in a single lifetime. In one of the cornerstone texts of Vedanta, the Vivekachudamani(attributed to Shankara), it says this in the very opening verse: Rare is it to be born a human being, rare still is to develop a rational mind, still rarer is to develop a religious yearning. Still rare, is is find the the path of Vedic dharma and remaining on it. After that, even rare are those who understand the knowledge of scripture. Having then embarked on a path of self knowledge, discriminating between the real and unreal and then having achieved self-realization, one becomes established in identity with Brahman while living, culminates in liberation. Such liberation does not take place until after millions of lifetimes of good deeds. You will find very similar thoughts in Buddhist and Jain thought. Basically the message is that of spiritual evolution over millions and millions of lifetimes before you become a Buddha or a Mahavira. Now, let us see how Swami Vivekananda applies this philosophy to understand world religions. Now, clearly Vedanta philosophy being universalist applies to every human being(in fact every living being in the universe) and thus wherever a human is born they will have the same purusharthas and the same stages of religious and spiritual evolution will take place. This takes place at a personal level but also at a mass level. Some cultures maybe at more primitive stages, some middling, some advanced. Acccording to Swami Vivekananda, India is the most advanced culture. Many non-Indian academics, scholars and philosophers agree that India is the most advanced, and this is why Hinduism has been adopted as the framework to understand comparative mythology, comparative religion, comparative philosophy and comparative psychology. The problem starts though when Hindus like you and me become chauvinistic and conceited because of the supremacy of Hinduism and start to look down all other religions as worthless, useless, not even worthy of consideration. This is a very unfortunate attitude and clearly Swami Vivekananda did not agree. He was able to recognise the good and bad in every religion, including in some versions of his own. You mention how the Jewish God is a jealous, barbaric God that murders and smites tribes down left right and centre and demands animal sacrifices. I agree, it is certainly primitive and barbaric. However, do you not note that in the same part of the world a few centuries later the Christian God emerges, who is not as jealous and barbaric, but more loving and forgiving? Do you not see the change in ethics of "eye for an eye" to "love thy neighbour, turn the other cheek"? Surely you can. Thus you can note there has been an evolution in thought and culture. Still, a few centuries later emerges a Christian Gnostic tradition who seem to have moved to the second stage of Vedanta, that they are one with God and that it is through knowledge that one must seek God. We can explain this evolution of religious and spiritual thought using Vedanta philosophy of Shankara. Rather than using a binary either/or barbaric or enlightened flippant judgement, see it in terms of a sliding scale. I can think of something even more barbaric than the Jewish God --- the Aztec God, the Aztec God demands periodic mass human sacrifice. Even the Islamic God is not as bad that. So we could say the Aztec God is more barbaric than the Jewish God, the Islamic God more barbaric than the Christian God etc. Some later offshoots of Islam like Sufism or the syncretic Bahai are definitely less barbaric. So, what we can note that over time religions do indeed evolve. You can say the very same thing about Hinduism. Hinduism was not always a religion of Yoga, meditation and ahimsa. In early Hinduism animal sacrificial rituals and Brahmanical elitism were the order of the day --- many who criticise Hinduism often attack this. The Jains and the Buddhists did NOT like this part of Hinduism, so they diverged from Vedic religion. However, later Hinduism(Uttara-Mimamsa) mostly expunged this practice(it still goes on in the Tantric tradition of Shaivism and Shaktism though) Today, to most Hindus animal sacrifices is an abhorrent practice. Swami Vivekananda had the maturity to be able to criticise his own religion as much as he would criticise other religions too. There is a lot still happening in Hinduism today which is at some stage of barbarism, and we need to be mature and introspective enough to acknowledge it, to ultimately right it. The great thing about Indians is they do have this ability to self-criticise, self correct and evolve. However, there are also a lot of Indians who are too haughty and proud, who blindly adhere to traditions that no longer serve them, that they will never change. I have spoken to many like this. In conclusion, the main point I want you to recognise is the common thread of humanity that ties us together and the common goals and yearning for truth, divine, beauty etc. There are differences indeed, and I am not saying ignore the differences, but acknowledge the similarities and realize we are all one large human fraternity(vasudaiva kutumbukum) and evolution is not just an individual thing, but a collective thing and we need to progress as a species together into the future. This is is what destiny wants as well, Hinduism has indeed been globalized into this global spirituality, which may not be often called Hinduism, but anybody who knows can see it is indeed Hinduism. India and Indians, like you and me, have a part to play in globalizing Hinduism, just as our ancestors wanted to do, when they said "Make the whole world Aryan" and this is what these Neo-Hindus Swami Vivekananda, Swami Yogananda, Sri Aurobindo, Ramana Maharishi et al were attempting to do. Help them along rather than criticise and condemn them. I also want to say this a wiser and enlightened person never hates or condemns those less wiser and enlightened, because they recognise at time they were at the same level and made the same mistakes, so rather they take the role of a guru to help them along the path that they have already trodden. On the other hand, when you do hate or condemn those you think who are less wise and enlightened than you, in actual fact you see them as rivals and threats and thus are not really anymore wiser and enlightened than they are. Hence, I say to you as you do indeed belong to a more advanced religion, you should be a bit more understanding and accommodating of those belonging to less advanced religions.

[@americandesi5703]

MrWarriorspirit Oh dear, do I really need to read all of this? Let me restate: Religions like Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, in which tribalism, racism, genocide, and slavery are looked upon as not immoral, are simply not compatible with Hinduism, whose philosophy describes a reality that transcends bodily identification based on the trai-guṇya paradigm. It is because Hindu Vedantists can understand the difference between Brahman, the jīva, and the guṇas (the latter constituting the universe as we know it and everything within it), that a Hindu can properly understand what other religions saturated in rājo-guṇa and tamo-guna are, and differentiate one's self and one's beliefs from them. What you have to understand about people like Swami Vivekananda and his uninformed followers is that all of them have a deep-seated inferiority complex about (what they understand to be) Hinduism vis-a-vis Christianity and feel compelled to rewrite it in a manner that makes it more "modern" or more palatable to a Christian-educated audience. This is nonsense. There is nothing wrong with the religion of Vedānta or the practices which are based on it. The flaw is only in the minds of those Western-educated Hindus who are unable to let go of their misconceptions. Swami Vivekananda famously said that India should become Hindu in philosophy and Muslim in action. Islam is a religion whose prophet, according to its own sacred texts, killed men, took their women as slaves, made some of those women slaves into his "wives" and raped them at ages as young as 9 years. We don't need these so-called "religions" to tell us what to believe in. We already know of a character in Hindu literature whose behavior equals that of Mohammed. Maybe you've heard of him. His name was Rāvaṇa. As far as Christianity is concerned, its Bible, which they claim to be the "word of God" describes a petty god who ordered his followers to kill rival tribes all the way down to their children. This occurred not once, but multiple times in the Old Testament. No, that religion isn't worthy of study by any barely-intellectual individual. But yes, I agree with you that we shouldn't disturb the tamāsic minds of people who are attached to these so-called "religions."

[@MrWarriorspirit]

You have a superiority complex

[@binoyshill4001]

5:25 the example is great A poetry translation

[@dimasgomez]

"No one is born in any religion. (...) We are born as human beings. We have an underlying unity as human beings. (...) If religion divides human beings into warring communities, that religion should be rejected. Or this particular idea [of that someone belongs to a specific religion] should be rejected."

[@entheoexplorations9199]

Thank you

[@karunkumar7107]

very nice perspectives. Unfortunately people consider dharma and spirituality as Abstract Ideas.

[@Sanjayrana63]

Truly a Pandit of Vedic literature!!!

[@amiraarora3363]

🙏🏻

[@casiandsouza7031]

There should be a fudimental principal in state constitutions restraining religions from judging people. Religious freedom should be to promote understanding and not to impose ones will.

[@vaibhavbobo]

wow....:o ... going through comments down people need to be teach and reach

[@RealEstateWithAjayShukla]

Dharma is only one... Accept this all is organise by someone. Dharma means " Dharan karne yogya"

[@reikiease]

Clear and true

[@ganesanr5398]

Guruji,though we could understand that the brought up method and life of the non vegetarian people we or strictly speaking our find it difficult to reconcile with the non vegetarian methods of living in our inner mind.Is there anyway to come out from that mindset?

[@arishsahani]

If we talk more about Karama and Reincarnation we can make human live like a human being.

[@vikrambmw007]

Be united Hindus....... Jai Hindu eekta .... Jai ommkaar parivaar eekta..... Jai sri ram

[@chandrashekarputhran2407]

Religion's are not Dharma. Dharma is not religions. Way of living is Hindu. Dharma is sanaatana (very old). Chirantana (ever lasting or permanent). And nitya nootana (ever green or ever new). There is only one God. He is eternal as nature. Love God and nature and thy love you. There is peace in the world. Last for human being is Mukti. That's being with God.

[@Deepa0309]

Even now dharma is downtroden...by a different kind of resistence...like shame, bullying...

[@jaiprem7413]

......the biblical ideology of original sin, and that Jesus is the only begotten son of god, born of a virgin, and died for the sins of the world, resurrected and ascended into heaven in his physical body, IS THE GREATEST FICTION EVER TOLD !!!

[@bisuray9056]

Or rather greatest copy right violation in history?Watch the series "Excavating the empty tomb" in truth surge's channel and another documentry on youtube "Jesus never existed".

[@jakyc.wangsaham1414]

Greatest fiction is Mahabharata n Ramayana......it is mythological epic story it is not based on true historical ....among Hindu itself they consider itself as mythological story, hope u know b welll what is mythology???but Bible n Jesus born virgin is fact even world major religion belief that pagan,Judaism n Even Islam too😂😁😀

[@firetree2007]

with such wonderful religion, or philosophy, or way of life, from ancient times, Hinduism cannot answer why in India history the nation(s) was conquered by waves of waves of intruders, these intruders established their respective reins in this non-resistant and non-changed land, gradually submerged themselves into this complete life style, or wonderful way of life under Hinduism, which answers everything from past to future, from previous to next life, until conquered by another intruder, this was kept going for over 3000 yrs. until British, which had its own not so wonderful philosophy, not so wonderful way of life, not so wonderful religion, not even with noble purpose, ruled India. therefore, seems, Hinduism is so complete and wonderful, it just did not teach people how to deal with intruders, and people in reality have no need to create new things, develop new technologies, to discover new areas, just enjoy the current life, and dream for next life, there will always be next life.

[@hinduhistory1407]

Thats distorted History which you read on wikipedia...even the moghuls couldnot conquer India..not even the whole north India was conquered by Moghuls...they did conquer all the muslim saltanats of India.. So brother dont believe everything you read about Indian history from wikipedia ...half of it is just pure lies

[@hinduhistory1407]

@Sunil Bhardwaj Shut up

[@RAIRADIO]

@@hinduhistory1407 what do you mean they couldnt conquer. We were attacked over and over, looted over and over again. Because we refuse to face the truth about the agenda of other religions.

[@vaibhavbobo]

i think sambhav means possibilities, or as we say "sub kuch sambhav hai"(every thing is possible), but how this tile says sambhav=same???????...sarva dharma sambhav= every dharma is possible

[@mrsatishpurohit]

Sama is equal. Bhava is attitude. Sama-bhav is exhibit the same attitude towards different objects/ideas. In this case it is different to have the same attitude towards all religions/ dharma.

[@philanthropo]

It is mis written. Sambhav is being born..sambhavaami..urge. It ought to be Sama bhaava.

[@1973sainisushil]

Good

[@mahadev108]

What is oppinion of DR David Frawley about racism in some Indian temples? About situation in some major Hindu temples which are not alow to enter Hindu of non-Indian origin? Jagannath temple in Puri, Lingeswar in Orissa, Shiva and Vishnu temples in Trichi, Vishnu temple in Trivandrum, Shiva temple in Trissur, Mahabaleshwar temple in Gokarna (Karnataka), Krishna temple in Guruvayur DOES NOT ALLOW white skin/western origin HINDU to enter temple. Not just western tourists but persons who followed Hinduism and got diksha in Hindu sampradaya. If you explaine temple guards that you are Hindu by your diksha and your belief, they simply answer "you are foreigner, foreigners not allowed". This is not misinformation, this is my own experience and experience of many my white skin friends. Even if you have traditional Indian dress, tilaka on your forehed (according your sampradaya) and explain temple guards that you initiated in Hinduism , you are NOT ALLOWED to enter temple and guards show you sign "Foreigners not allowed". And dont want to listern that you are Hindu. Sanatana Dharma should be open for people from all over the World who want to accept its wisdom.

[@bisuray9056]

In odissa state they are very secretive in nature.When Islamic invasion happened almost whole of north India gave up but Odissa couldn't be conquered.It is because of this they never trust any foreign people let alone letting them into temples which might give them an idea about the riches stored in the temple .For this they had trained elephants to identify foreigners to crush them under feet right at the entrance .They don't even trust other non odia people .Because of their territorial nature they still stand strong in modern times.

[@clearvoiceful]

Ritual is not spirituality. Ritual is tradition based.

[@SammyNarayan]

Ilya Zhuravlev, Indeed Temples should be opened to foreigners until the 7th Century. But what has prompted the Temple Priests and local rulers to close doors of Temples making them off-limits to foreign who were white-skin or fairer than the natives? Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in 1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered and Temples were looted and plundered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million. By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims. Animal sacrifices were forcefully introduced. As a result, many Temples were closed to foreigners.

[@SammyNarayan]

Danny. B Please visit this link. m.rediff.com/news/2003/oct/21franc.htm

[@linaraay]

Yes few temples like jagannath temple puri dont allow hindu's of foreign origin who got diksha. Simply bcoz it is difficult to differentiate among the ones who got diksha n others who are not. They are visitors who lie so that they can enter into temple. Not all visits temples with devotion. Bcoz temple guards believe foreigners eat beef so they put everyone in same category. For hindu's slaughter of cow is equal to brahma hatya ( few exceptions are there who eat beef)

[@Sam-uo6ps]

Dharma is mentioned dozens of times and 'dharmic tradtions" but is never defined. all that is said is it has many meanings.

[@indianmilitary]

Dharmic culture is nothing but a culture in sync with laws of nature. It is also called as sanathana (eternal) dharma (laws of nature) culture or hindu (ism).

[@SJWojak]

Wow

[@ajaysharma6348]

Only HINDUISM, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism reach to nothing.(infinity) Everything is coming from nothing and going back to nothing. AUM

[@lindamckenzie1537]

"In dharmic traditions there is no salvation by proxy." Yes, generally true but not strictly true if we consider Pure Land Buddhism and the salvific role of Amitabha Buddha. This is seen most strongly in Japanese Jodo Shinsu in which salvation if dependent on faith alone. Pure Land Buddhism has by far more adherents than any other Buddhist sect in the world.

[@ketutdonder4198]

Namaskar, From one side we can say that each religion is different, but from the others side we can say that all religions are same. What I means, if we say "religion", yes it is same. And then if we say the complete name of each religion, e.i., Hindu religion, Buddha religion, Christian religion, Islam religion, and other religion, those are true different. All of them very depend to each few of their theology and philosophy to understanding of The Ultimate Reality, who Him no any form and no any name. Bhagavadgita XII.2 and X.2 say that very difficult for one to pray to The Ultimate Reality (God) without form and without name. That is cause, every saint in different place then construct his views of God. Without my claim, the Hindu has special goal that very different among all of religions, that is moksha or liberation and united with God. This teaching no there in any religion. My respect to His Holiness Pandit Vamadeva Shastri I KETUT DONDER

[@RAIRADIO]

Dharma karma moksha is there in all dharmic traditions. The key difference between Hindu dharma and others is that, Hinduism believes in many paths and doesnt cancel anyone. Islam, xtianity calls others as false. Islam goes one step forward and makes blasphemy apostacy and leaving islam punishable.

[@shoonnya]

Please spell Sanskrit words in English properly. Sambhav (संभव) is a completely differnt word in Sanskrit which means genesis as in Kumaara-sambhavam (कुमारसंभवम्). I think you meant samabhaav here (समभाव) which means "being equal"

[@njzupdates]

shoonnya thankgod!

[@philanthropo]

He recited properly. Only title is wrong.

[@dharmayogaashram979]

Naive to assume that innumerable Hindus do not adhere to unprovable faith in claims about some Hindu Devas/Devis.

[@penlight5289]

Moksha is to attain Mukti and Mukunda is the one who gives Mukti..... There is only one person who can be called Mukunda

[@pushkarjayanth]

Jai sriram

[@dharakalyan]

I don't agree the term militant mysticism, it was always been based on 100% love to God ,and no hate and violence .also hindu tantric theory is quietly misunderstood here. Tantra can not be directly justified as black magic or hypnotizing .tantric principal was introduced by lord Shiva to show the path to divinity starting from our biological natural instinct.

[@kalaiselvi1754]

the term militant mysticism suits Islam in some parts of middle east.

[@buxwaha500kvi]

बहुसमीचीनम् महोदय

[@joseluisgomezsoler7601]

“"Each religion has helped [hu]mankind. Paganism increased in [hu]man the light of beauty, the largeness and height of his life, his aim at a many-sided perfection; Christianity gave him some vision of divine love and charity; Buddhism has shown him a noble way to be wiser, gentler, purer, Judaism and Islam how to be religiously faithful in action and zealously devoted to God; Hinduism has opened to him the largest and profoundest spiritual possibilities. A great thing would be done if all these God-visions could embrace and cast themselves into each other; but intellectual dogma and cult egoism stand in the way." "All fanaticism is false, because it is a contradiction of the very nature of God and of Truth. Truth cannot be shut up in a single book, Bible or Veda or Koran, or in a single religion. The Divine Being is eternal and universal and infinite and cannot be the sole property of the Mussulmans or of the Semitic religions only, - those that happened to be in a line from the Bible and to have Jewish or Arabian prophets for their founders. Hindus and Confucians and Taoists and all others have as much right to enter into relation with God and find the Truth in their own way. All religions have some truth in them, but none has the whole truth; all are created in time and finally decline and perish…. God and Truth outlast these religions and manifest themselves anew in whatever way or form the Divine Wisdom chooses." Sri Aurobindo "When I read her letter and learned the whole story, as always I did like this (gesture of still offering upward), and then the TRUE thing came (not at all what she thinks or what the Pope thinks, but the TRUE thing): an essential unity that will manifest on earth, but not just for this particular religion - for ALL religions, all the religions that were manifestations of a ... to understand each other clearly, let us say of an Avatar, that is, something that was sent down from above, that came to earth to bring a message, and a religion came out of it (I am not talking about all the forms of superstition and ignorance). Those religions are destined to go back to their Origin and form a complex unity, complete, total, that is to say, the essence of all human aspirations for ... the unknown Divine. And that has not only been sanctioned: it EXISTS. In other words, it's ready to descend." The Mother (Mirra Alfassa), Agenda (September 16, 1967)

[@nirmalan5590]

How can they be the same? Even the potato that we grow in different parts of the world tastes different. Point to note is HUMANS are the same every where ,with the same nature, like the potato, which has certain qualities inherent to it. This inherent quality remains the same world over.

[@arielrojaslizana8114]

so you really believe that crimea war was for religious reasons? religions reasons have been always a facade, the real causes of wars are always economic conveniences, religion is just a justification.

[@dixonmicucci9271]

1. Believing that karma (or reincarnation, etc) all occur certainly strikes me as something that takes "faith." These are no more *_empirically_* observable than Western theological tenets. *2. You also try to draw a contrast* at 17:00, but at 17:40 and especially 18:18, it sure sounds like you can replace Jesus's "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you" with "ahimsa". ;-) *3. You include Judaism with the "faith based," but then you go on to lump together (falsely) all the faith-based in terms of:* - SALVATION. Judaism rejects the concept of salvation inherent in the later faith-based religions. - PROSELYTIZATION. Jews aren't allowed to ask or provoke a foreigner to convert, in his own homeland. - HEAVEN/HELL. Jews accept that all "righteous" people of any religion go to heaven. (or "The World To Come" which is the Judaic equivalent of heaven. It would have been nice to see *Judaism contrasted* against the later (Dark Age) religions who claim to be replacing Judaism, e.g. at 21:17 and the discussion of jihad just before 21:17, and at 21:42. Indus Valley Civilization shares many artifacts & other shared-cultural cues with the Canaanite-Paganism of the pre-Israelite (Abrahamic, etc) era of the Torah _(as Professors John N Tubb and Mark Smith led the Scientific Consensus that Israelites are a tribe or sub-sect of Canaanites, with geneticists al-Zaheri 2003 and others then concurring)_... including that the Mesopotamians inbeween the Vedic/Indus cultures and the Canaano-Israelite cultures also share many artifacts wih both Canaan and Indus Valley, and the Mesopotamians this practice. ...Those who believe in the Torah but not the New Testament -- and all other Eurasian and North African religions *of the Neolithic/Bronze Ages* -- have all, always (even today's Jews), rejected proselytization of a foreigner in his own homeland, until the Greco-Romans who broke this pact of mutual respect (when they were still yet Pagan Europeans... but of course the LATER Roman - _Christians_ continued this Euro-Pagan tradition of proselytizing, often violently of course), and as subsequent (Later Medieval) Christians and Muslims gained even more influence in Asia (extending even to colonialist-India and Gunboat Diplomacy, rather than the Roman's era, as these early-Medieval Europeans (Romans) only were able to control & influence Hasmonean/Hellenic-and-later Judea, Coptic Egypt, northward to Armenia, etc, and Caliphs also needed until several centuries after Rome to extend influence to today's Pakistan, all the way to Morocco/Spain). But overall, a good & accurate talk, except those 3 points.

[@dixonmicucci9271]

My last point is that Judaism most frequently follows the same principles as the other Neolithic-Bronze Age religions, when it comes to how Jews interact with non-Western religions. What you should be contrasting isn't Western/"faith based" but rather the 2 DARK AGE (Roman-Catholic & later Christianity, plus Islam) versus the religions of Antiquity. I agree that Judaism is faith-based, but some parts of some Eastern religions (such as my 1st disagreement pointed out) also require SOME faith.

[@MrWarriorspirit]

(1) I agree with you, saying that there is no faith in Dharmic religions, is overstating it. You can meet as many Dharmic adherents who simply believe in Buddhist beliefs like realms of hungry ghosts as you do adherents of Abrahamic religions who believe in heaven and hell. However, what I think he is meaning to say that Dharmic religions do not just make statements without rational justification, and this is when it becomes philosophy rather than faith. Karma, reincarnation, Self, to even atoms none of which are empirically observable, are all postulated based on arguments. Dharmic religions also give you the freedom to challenge these beliefs and will try to reason these beliefs with you by rational argument e.g. argument for atoms in Dharmic texts state "If you could divide a grain of rice and a mountain infinitely forever, then you could start with dividing a grain of rice forever and then divide and then put them together and end up with a mountain, which is absurd, therefore there must be a point which is indivisible and that is an atom" In Dharmic epistemology, it is accepted that those things which cannot be empirically observable, can be established through logical inference. If you accept inference as a valid means of knowledge, then you would accept karma, reincarnation etc(based on strength of arguments) However, Dharmic religions do not accept inference as "true" knowing, because it is only conceptual knowing. Until it does not become self-knowledge through direct experience, it is not real knowledge. Even atoms are just mere concepts, till they become direct experience. What you do need to accept though that the means the Dharmic religion prescribes(like Yoga, meditation etc) will in fact lead to a direct experience of atoms etc. This again either requires faith or acceptance of the metaphysical theories that justify that these means are in fact valid means of knowing. This is why there a lot of philosophical debate on epistemology in Dharmic philosophy. So the professor is right in saying that mere acceptance of belief is not enough in Dharmic religion, it must be realised through a long and sustained practice. Even here the Dharmic religions do not just rely on faith, but delineate and signpost stage by stage what happens during practice, what are the obstacles in the practice, how to overcome those obstacles and how do you know how far you have got. All of these are testable statements. Basically the aim is to gradually purify and still the mind so that other states of consciousness can be experienced. It is during these states that people claim to directly experienced atoms etc. In modern consciousness studies it has indeed been proven that these practices do lead to different states of consciousness and the phenomenological features of these experiences do indeed match the descriptions in the Dharmic texts. Not only is that not belief, it is not philosophy either, it becomes science. The Dharmic religions thus clearly have a scientific character, which is not present in Abrahamic religions. (2) Indeed, what is being described here is the golden rule which is present in most religions, treat others as you want to be treated yourself. This is a common sense rule of ethics. However, in Dharmic religion it is taken to a more logical extreme, treat not just other humans, but all living beings as you would want to be treated yourself, by recognising a more scientific principle that all living things are sentient beings that experience pain and pleasure, and that just like we do not want to be subject to pain, nor do they. It is thus not just an ethical theory, but almost a scientific theory of ethics. However, the professor does not explain the real epistemology behind the 5 major ethics of Dharmic religions non-stealing, non-lying, non-violence, non-coveting, non-lusting which is actually scientific, violating these actions either in thought, speech or action lead to negative emotional states like anger, greed, violence, pride and addiction which disturb peace of mind. As the aim of spiritual practice is to purify and still the mind over time, they are counter-productive. There is also a metaphysical theory based on law of karma(again based on inference) that because the universe is interconnected, whatever action we put out, actually loops back to us. If I hurt somebody, that same hurt I caused will come back to me eventually. This is somewhat observable if I give to charity, later I get the same amount I gave to charity back from some other means, maybe a surprise bonus at work. Again, there is a lot of argumentation on karma in Dharmic literature and in Jainism hair-splitting analysis of types of karma into hundreds of sub-types. In Jainism karma is not just some abstract principle, but real physical particles that attach to the soul whenever it performs an action via thought, speech or action and they travel many times the speed of light forwards and backwards in time creating instant results for the action. (3) I don't know a lot about Judaism to offer comment, but I do know that in the Torah the Jewish God is a jealous God who demands no other Gods be worshipped, hence I find it hard to accept your claim that Judaism accepts that righteous people of other religions can also go to heaven. You mention that the people of the Indus Valley may have been the Canaanites-Pagans described in the Torah. If this is true, then the Torah clearly describes that the Jewish God hated them and commanded genocide of them. The Jewish God is constantly smiting down through plagues, earthquakes and genocides all non-Israelite tribes. This is not at all consistent with your claim that Judaism says other religions can go to heaven. I agree with your point that Judaism does not practice proselytising, but that is because they believe that you only be born as a Jew, as an Israelite and then are by default a chosen person of God. I am interested in what shared cultural similarities you are talking about between the Indus Valley people and Mesopotamia or the Vedic people and Canaanites. I know that Indus Valley and Mesopotamia traded, as Indus seals and Indian commodities have been found in Mesopotamia(like Indian Muslin) However, beyond that I don't see any similarity. The Mesopotamia was a highly centralized society with the priest-kings ruling over slaves from their Ziggagurts(sp) and Indus culture was a rather middle class, egalitarian society with no palaces and also far more scientifically advanced(cities were better planned, underground sewage system, multi-story homes and toilets and better irrigation) The script was also different, Mesopotamia was cuniform and Indus script was hieroglyphic/pictographic. The system of numbers was also different, the Indus used a ten-based number system and the Mesopotamians used a 60 based number system. I think they clearly were very different civilisations with very different philosophical systems and ideologies. I am curious, however, are the Sumerians the same as the "Asuras" in Vedic thought, which are considered to be a fallen demonic people.

[@animax1034]

@@MrWarriorspirit and mayan civilization is connectd to mayasur in our texts and many such history is filled in our texts which is yet to be discovered

[@Digital-Dental-Designing-Tech]

Practicing purity of the mind is real dharma(religion) or universal law of nature. All others are organised religions not universal religion. Common sense the fire will burn all and water will cool all this is the nature(dharm) of fire and water. So dharm(nature) is one and universal. All so called religions are called sectors or sectarian and not true universal dharm or nature's laws which apply to all human beings irrespective of what they call them, Hindu, or Muslim, or Jain, or Buddhist, or Christian and so on. Why the so called spiritual teachers and so called experts on explaining religion, are confusing the masses by their never ending ending talks and not teaching the practical laws of nature which governs the human beings. That is how to practice purity of mind. In simple words to develop wisdom to liberate(mox, मोक्ष, मुक्त) in hindi , free the mind from the defilements that is ill will, hatred, animosity, anger, jealousy and so on. There is no other liberation, salvation or nirvana for a living human being, and all other ideas of nirvana, moksha and so on are mere distraction, misleading from the reality in the name of religion, dharma, spirituality, enlightenment and all those misleading big words, which does not explain how to purify mind and develop the universal qualities that is friendship, equanimity, sympathetic love, and compassion. Which will bring peace and happiness, harmony and good will to the human being's mind. This common sense is the essence of real dharm, true religion and this is the foundation of all organised religions, and it is same for all human beings of this earth, no matter what he/she calls or believes him/herself, as a Hindi, or a Muslim, or Jain, Buddhist, Christian, Parsi, Sikh and so on. So the fundamentals are 1. Live a moral life. 2. Become master of the mind. 3. Develop wisdom with own experience not borrowed wisdom, to develop wholesome qualities mentioned in the beginning which brings peace and love, happiness and harmony in individual mind by removing defilements from the mind. May all be happy and at ease, by practicing purity of mind and free themselves, liberate themselves from the ignorance of generating ego. And be free from dis-ease. 🙏🙏🙏 ॐ शांति शांति शांति May there be peace May there be peace May there be peace everywhere.

[@RAIRADIO]

There no concept of purity. It is a concept of responsibility depending on nature and situation.

[@mareden4089]

Funny how he just mentions Christianity and Islam, but nothing about Judaism. 🤔

[@natokandfunnyvideo6917]

GOOD BUT EVERYTHING IS NOT RIGHT ,,,KRISHNA CAN GIVE YOU MOKHKHSA,,KNOW IN DETAILS ABOUT KRISHNA

[@KortovElphame]

No

[@drege8510]

Nope.

[@sahdevpatil9284]

Simpli dharma means not riligian.it is natchural flow Human, and all creachar and all bramhand swabhav.donetion mins dharm.moral harmless activity for human.and all juvas dharma is difarant prakrutis pravruti mins dharma its min low aktivity natcher and witchsnes pospiurity.

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

Sanatana vedic religion is barbaric anf inhumane ..VEDIC HINDUISM IS BARBARIC AND INHUMANE.. Read STUPID SANATANA VEDIC MORONISM AND injustices before talking. SHAME AND CRUEL. 1. "sathi" girls will be burnt alive when husbands dies..horrible culture. 2. "Baliya vivagh" a girl get married at 8 or 10 and if the BOY husband dies at 12 age, the girl will be tonsured and humiliated as widow and her life doomed..sometime such girls were donated to temples.. devapirar or dasi for abuses...shame culture 3. " Gangapirava" new born babies thrown into River Ganges or ganga river as religious ritual..no where such cruel infanticide other than SANTANA vedic cruelty adharma 4. "KANYA VADHA " KILLING FEMALE CHILDREN..EVEN ANIMALS WONT DO IT BUT VEDIC SANATANIST PRACTISED IT. 5. "NARA VADHA" HUMAN SACRIFICE! KILLING PREGNANT LADIES OR CHILDREN TO PLEASE GODS...NO SANE PERSON WILL DO SUCH VEDIC SANTANA barbaric PRACTICE 6.in Kerala Sambandham was a concubinage system primarily followed by the Nairs and Ambalavasi with Namboothiri in what is the present-day Indian state of Kerala. The honey moon of newly wed girls must be with nambudri brahmin priests not with husbands..vedic Santana prostitution.. 7. Untouchability..hard working low income people are low castes and they shoud not enter temples, even PRESIDENT of INDIA a well respected hindu was not permitted to enter a temple in north India. Some castes were not allowed to comeout during daytime because they are not be seen by highcastes..others cannot walk in agraharam brahmin street..only british and social reformist like Periyar changed that barbaric sanatana practices.. 8.In 19th century Travancore lower-caste women were not allowed to wear clothes that covered their breasts. They had to pay a tax called breast tax to the travancore officials if they wished to cover their breasts. SANTANA ADHARMA AND VEDIC STUPIDTIES ARE MORE AND MORE CANNOT BE POSTED HERE..

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

@Amit Mathur HINDUISM is poluted ( theetu) by politicism and morality is missing from Sanctum Sanctorum to everywhere. If you strongly believe in GOD and not religions, then reform Hinduism to make it all inclusive and equality for all Hindus and not brahmin centric and disriminatory. With so many invasions Hindusim survived and will survive for ever ..eternal!...the worst enemy of Hindusim is Braminism and not Islam or Christianity. Make Hindu religion a more inclusive (make all castes as Jeeyars and priests) more caring for all Hindus (not a monopoly of Brahmins or Hindutva, I do agree that there are honest and good Brahmins also among us)...that way you can prevent religious conversion. Even the converts will return Hinduism if you guys keep reforming Hindus religion and keep telling only the goodness of Hindusim than ruthelessly attacking other religions. Our strength our Religion not the weakness of other religions. Sarvam Krishnarpanam!

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

@Amit Mathur people like you are hereditory and pathological liars. Why recycle the puranic lies ? 🤣🤣🤣 I know you are one of those educated illiterates.. suffering with incurable illusory truth disease! You believe lies when you feel too vulnerable to allow the truth and its consequences to manifest in your life. When truth does emerge, you often feel terribly betrayed and you can lose faith in your own ability to make good judgments. To protect against this pain, you sometimes continue lying to yourselves long after reality seems unavoidable. If you read Thirukural (Tamil.moral texts written in 2150 years back even before sanskrit was created and translated into 83 global languages) and practice it you may be cure from the disease. The only pathyam (condition) YOU should never wear a poonool to rub your itches..

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

@Amit Mathur Amazing ! Your writing exposed how stupid you are...growup kid you remind me the Lamarkism! According to Lamarkism if some one not use their brain and logical thinking for long time, then their brain become defunct like you the sanatana sattans!

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

VEDAS ARE NOT HINDU MORALS OR RELIGION. BY CALLING VEDIC RELIGION WE INSULT HINDUISM BECAUSE NONE OF THE HINDU GODS WERE MENTIONED IN VEDAS. WHY WE ARE CHEATING OURSELVES AND OTHERS? .VEDAS PRAISE INDRA AGNI AND OTHER IRANIAN AND ANATOLIAN GODS. EVEN RAM ABD LAXMAN ARE IN ANATOLIAN PROTOINDOEUROPEAN AND SANSKRUT IS A DERIVATIVE OF ANATOLIAN LANGUAGE PERFECTED AFTER HEAVILY. BORROWING FROM DRAVIDIAN AND NAGARI SCRIPT of Nagars IN400AD. PLEASE read atleast once the four vedas..rig veda is cruel fight with native brown skinned Indians (Dravidian) by invader Aryan, sama veda the same in musical version , yajur the same theme with rituals and atharva full of vengeance.. Anatolian oral language that was perfected in India. The Mittani Kings (SYRIAN) List ( Sumerians chronicling their Kings read history ) includes not only Rama and Bharata, but the names of other Hindu Puranic figures find a place in the Kings List. The Names found are Indra, Pururavas , Dasaratha, Parashurama, Satyavrata, Iksvahu, Kakusha, Janaka, Vasishta, Janamejaya, Dushyanta(Father of Bharata after whom India is named as Bharatavarsha), Rishis Gautama, Dundhu,, Muchukunda, Drupada, Harischandra, Sagara,Bhagiratha, Lava, Kusha(Rama’s sons), Aja and Raghu (Rama’s ancestors), Pundarika, Subandu and so on. These are names brought from Syria ..even today the names " Kannan, subhandu, Modhy(Modi?), Adwani (Lk?)..are common names in arabic world including Syria

[@KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq]

@Amit Mathur Avvai a lady poet wrilote 2000years back வெண்பா : 9 தீயாரைக் காண்பதுவும் தீதே; திரு அற்ற தீயார் சொல் கேட்பதுவும் தீதே - தீயார் குணங்கள் உரைப்பதுவும் தீதே; அவரோடு இணங்கி இருப்பதுவும் தீது English meaning...It is harmful to see the wicked, It is harmful to listen to their words, It is harmful to talk about their character and It is harmful to have them as friends

[@emilythomas6269]

There is caste system in Hinduism. That's bad

[@animax1034]

there was no caste cystems until british era the whole society was equal and even a sudra if have qualities of brahmin can become one british and other invaders currupted our systems because they were not able to understand such a complex culture caste system were forced upon us by invaders and they did lot of damage and spread lot of hate towards hindus they did whatever they can to make us inferior but truth is revealing little by little

[@animax1034]

@Resurrected jesus exactly caste systems didnt existed before 1700, there was system of raja and praja, only one ruler rest all equal

[@Sunny-rh6ik]

Der ul Islam Der ul herbkzbin.info/www/bejne/r3mpeauarNWhm7M Der ul sulah

[@pharehapoh3673]

this is a very vague speech. waste of my time

[@animax1034]

lol some people cant get the point

[@animax1034]

@Resurrected jesus exactly they don't understand religion is nothing but separation of humanity, it's corruption in humanity, it's a plan to take the world under churches control, mosque control, etc. Ask any tribal people what is your religion or ask any animal what is your religion, if you ask a Hindu he will say Hinduism is not a religion it's way of life and it's works on all humanity and animals as well