Рет қаралды 1,517
Talk delivered at the online SAT members gathering 23rd April 2022
The lecture examines and tests claims by John Casson, William D. Rubinstein, and Ken Feinstein, that the annotator of a copy of Dionysius of Halicarnasus’s Roman Antiquities (1546) and Appian of Alexandria’s An Ancient History and Exquisite Chronicle (1551) now at Audley End in Essex are in the handwriting of Henry Neville. The annotations are of interest to literary historians as they follow many elements of the Antony and Cleopatra story that appear prominently in the Shakespearean play. According to Stuart Gillespie’s Athlone Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Books Appian was a significant source for both Antony and Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. The lecture follows a standard protocol for forensic linguistic examination, showing both similarities and differences between the questioned document annotations and the established samples of Neville’s handwriting and concluding that it is virtually impossible to identify Sir Henry Neville as the annotator and that, instead, other hypotheses about the genesis of the annotations and history of the books should be considered.