SAT 2022 Members' Event: Roger Stritmatter on Neville's Handwriting

  Рет қаралды 1,517

ShakespeareanAuthorshipTrust

ShakespeareanAuthorshipTrust

2 жыл бұрын

Talk delivered at the online SAT members gathering 23rd April 2022
The lecture examines and tests claims by John Casson, William D. Rubinstein, and Ken Feinstein, that the annotator of a copy of Dionysius of Halicarnasus’s Roman Antiquities (1546) and Appian of Alexandria’s An Ancient History and Exquisite Chronicle (1551) now at Audley End in Essex are in the handwriting of Henry Neville. The annotations are of interest to literary historians as they follow many elements of the Antony and Cleopatra story that appear prominently in the Shakespearean play. According to Stuart Gillespie’s Athlone Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Books Appian was a significant source for both Antony and Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. The lecture follows a standard protocol for forensic linguistic examination, showing both similarities and differences between the questioned document annotations and the established samples of Neville’s handwriting and concluding that it is virtually impossible to identify Sir Henry Neville as the annotator and that, instead, other hypotheses about the genesis of the annotations and history of the books should be considered.

Пікірлер: 7
@rooruffneck
@rooruffneck Жыл бұрын
Roger, great job!
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter Жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@avlasting3507
@avlasting3507 7 ай бұрын
Well done. Any thoughts Roger on who the writer may have been?
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 6 ай бұрын
It should be clarified for the record that the annotations formerly identified as appearing in Appian (first by Casson and Rubinstein in their book and then by me in this talk) are actually in a copy of Cassius Dio that is bound up with a copy of Appian (which, however contains annotations entirely or mostly by Sir Henry Savile and none, apparently by the "Audley End Unknown" annotator). This matters because although both Appian and Dio include materials relevant to *Julius Caesar,* the wording and emphases of the two accounts differ. Dio, however, also includes an account of Antony and Cleopatra that is absent in Appian, which ends c. 43 BCE around the time of assassination of Caesar Augustus.
@floatingholmes
@floatingholmes 6 ай бұрын
I wish such rigor was standard across the board in Authorship study.
Roger Stritmatter: From Literary Encryptions to Handwriting, a Work in Progress
43:16
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Рет қаралды 2,9 М.
Roger Stritmatter talks Shakespeare and the Law
36:08
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Рет қаралды 2,3 М.
路飞被小孩吓到了#海贼王#路飞
00:41
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 82 МЛН
How Many Balloons Does It Take To Fly?
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 177 МЛН
Cool Items! New Gadgets, Smart Appliances 🌟 By 123 GO! House
00:18
123 GO! HOUSE
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Master English Idioms Part 2: Colourful Expressions You Need to Know
9:20
The World Language School
Рет қаралды 2
Shakespeare's Notes in Oxford's Hand? Roger Stritmatter at the Blue Boar Tavern
58:37
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Рет қаралды 5 М.
SAT Conference 2020 - 5 - Alexander Waugh - Shakespeare the Outcast
28:12
ShakespeareanAuthorshipTrust
Рет қаралды 9 М.
SAT 2022 Members' Event: Robin Williams on Shakespeare's Language
23:21
ShakespeareanAuthorshipTrust
Рет қаралды 1,1 М.
Roger Stritmatter - Poetic Form As Code in the First Folio
27:59
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
SAT Conference 2021 - 3 - Ros Barber - Problems with the Thomas North Attribution
27:24
ShakespeareanAuthorshipTrust
Рет қаралды 2,5 М.
路飞被小孩吓到了#海贼王#路飞
00:41
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 82 МЛН