ArmA 3 - Laws of War - Campaign Gameplay #2

Join me in the second part of the ArmA 3 Laws of War campaign!
Explore a different perspective on the battlefield with the addition of a humanitarian faction, van, drone, mini-campaign, and much more, in the Arma 3 Laws of War DLC.
Half of Bohemia Interactive's net revenue from direct sales (not as part of bundles) of the Arma 3 Laws of War DLC in 2017 will be donated to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The total amount raised will be announced on www.bistudio.com in
2018.
Support SaucyNetwork on Patreon: / saucynetwork
Social Networks;
- Facebook: tinyurl.com/zp5qlbb
- Twitter: / saucynetwork
- Steam Group: steamcommunity.com/groups/sauc...
- Join my teamspeak!: steamcommunity.com/groups/sauc...
Want to be partnered with Curse?
- www.unionforgamers.com/apply?r... Get in touch with me here;
► Twitch: / boltsauce
► Twitter: / saucynetwork
► Instagram: / snyoutube
► Discord: / discord
PC specs ► bit.ly/2wu7XUN Get in touch with me here;
► Twitter: / saucynetwork
► Instagram: / snyoutube
► Twitch: / boltsauce
► Discord: / discord
PC specs ► bit.ly/2wu7XUN

[@wolfe9173]

You've actually missed an important end to this, where he talks about the fact it could have been NATO who called the strike as it flicks between CSAT and Millers squad.

[@SaucyNetworkEntertainment]

Yea that part was really buggy on my end for some reason

[@albernard8751]

It could’ve also been CSAT playing ten dimensional chess and framed NATO for this to decrease local trust in them and they were also using the Eastwind Device in the region found out from the Arma 3 Apex expansion those tremors? They weren’t natural... and they were also trying to install local CSAT friendly governments as part of their APEX Protocol and this would’ve probably been CSAT due to the fact that it would decrease local trust in NATO and make the local populous more friendly to another side say CSAT for example so they could’ve been playing ten dimensional chess this ENTIRE time.

[@albernard8751]

I can see NATO WANTING to do this but not doing so due to well a soldier going to the press about it due to guilt or some reporter finding out about it NATO is a BIG organization well known they do something like this someone will probably find out about this, CSAT on the other hand is more secretive and less information is known about them and it took a NATO I’m pretty sure special forces team to even FIND OUT ABOUT THEIR EASTWIND DEVICE! And CSAT would have the most to gain in my opinion by making this play and leaving shell casings their if they wanted to they would’ve policed their brass and leave no trace behind but they didn’t likely to frame NATO intentionally leaving evidence behind to do so. So either NATO being well dumb asses or CSAT which would have more to gain and playing ten dimensional chess.

[@michaelmaryn5718]

I personally think its a 4D chess play here, AAF dropped the bomb no doubt as you can physically see its an AAF plane doing so. However, the bomb itself is an csat cluster bomb, makes some sense as csat would probably be more lose with weapons sales to the aaf. However the big one, NATO definitely did not guide in the bombs, it was CTRG for sure, even more so if you do the part completely stealthy. Lets also consider this, if it was CSAT who guided the bomb in, then the dead FIA soldiers would have drastically different bullet wounds, seeing as how 6.5 hits like a truck in comparison to 5.56 nato. But thats my take on it, my last point is the designator, if it was CSAT why would they not use their camouflage variant?

[@hunormagyar1843]

@@michaelmaryn5718 NATO also uses 6.5 in the Arma universe, so I don't see what you mean with the bullet wounds part.

yep dont look for "bouncing betty injuries"

[@dridri78630]

thanks for this replay cant afford the dlc right now. Also great job on keeping the conversations whilst moving the video ahead to not make it too long.

[@brumizso]

by the way, plastic mines are illegal and considered a war crime.

[@pg955203]

You know you could use T to target each of the targets and there'll be unique dialog explaining what each of those targets are. The one you are aiming at is actually the IDAP doctor. If you waited a while he'll leave and you can spare his life.

[@SaucyNetworkEntertainment]

He looked like he was up to something. Didnt know you could check out each target. THey shoudve made that more clear

[@iNakmj]

if you press H, there are some hint.(press t), and i thinks he was doing CPR for save life.

[@ongjunhong]

Arma: Paint the town with the Laser Designator, or you won't finish the mission Also Arma: GREAT JOB GENIUS! YOU'VE JUST COMMITTED WAR CRIMES!

[@SaucyNetworkEntertainment]

hehe i know right

[@felixaplin7958]

You can avoid the war crime if you just wait for the doctor to move back to the church.

[@OceanTheFreak]

Intresting 'lets play' only seen the first part of this and then this. Had to leave a comment about what i think. Unlike most youtubers, i really like your style of commentary. Its at a minimum, To the point and other obvious observations that are worth a mention. Lets see if i keep watching this and only get 2 hours of sleep before work. Then im pretty sure you got a new subscriber XD... Cheers!

[@gameninja0399]

These videos are nice. You don't talk too much, which is good for listening

[@anonviewerciv]

Getting memories of Vice City here...

[@g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314]

Instantly looks up bouncing betty injuries...

[@pepastrunecky2476]

could you tell me something about your video settings ?

[@lucavondelfin889]

I'm watching this my first time exactly one year after the upload of the video😂

[@TS-je3cl]

why does bohemia interactive always include sneaky mentions about my county: the netherlands?

[@mangored209]

where?

[@kidsebas]

One episode a day?

[@SaucyNetworkEntertainment]

Pretty much yea. Part 3 will most likely be released tomorrow. Its the finale

[@kidsebas]

alright, awesome

[@holz2564]

Teamspeak? Get a discord server

[@SaucyNetworkEntertainment]

both have pros and cons. You are free to join anytime