Science behind Sexuality | Deepak Modi | TEDxKCCEMSR

[@chitrathakur889]

After long time, i heard a flowy, flawless scientific presentation that common man can understand. Thank you Dr. Deepak Modi

[@beena3353]

Very informative talk. It should be circulated widely to improve our concept of homosexuality

[@kieth900]

Wow finally the answers about homosexuality are coming to light. Excellent information thank you

[@quantumfieldsforever]

THANK YOU SO, SO MUCH FOR YOUR INTEREST, YOUR RESEARCH, YOUR INTELLECTUAL CURIOSITY, YOUR DISCOVERY AND YOUR ELOQUENT DELIVERY OF THE SCIENTIFIC FACTS ABOUT WHO "I am". I'M FREE, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY, I'M FREE AT LAST! MUCH LOVE TO YOU DEEPAK MODI, ❤😂. MUCH LOVE, INCLUSIVENESS AND COMPASSION TO ALL OF HUMANITY. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@KiranKumar-uc4zd]

The same talk should also be in Hindi so that Indian parents may understand it in a better manner.

[@johngillespie3994]

What about bisexuals? Is there a study about bisexuality that ties in with this study.

[@davesinspiration]

At 18:15 he mentions it slightly

[@boyimp9778]

I’ve always had a theory where we are evolving to where our brains are developing from their animal brain to a modern brain, in which we don’t rely as much on reproduction, survival and natural instincts. Reproduction and survival is quite normal of course, and us as a species will live on regardless. Natural instincts, so being attracted to opposite gender exclusively too, we are slowly letting go of because we don’t benefit from them anymore. It’s probably a silly thought tho, I’m no specialist whatsoever.

[@khushimehar878]

@@boyimp9778 No..it's not silly. This makes a lot of sense. Of course I haven't learn too much about evolution, just what the school taught us. But really what you said might be true. This is how everything was invented. Everything was just a silly thought and then it developed into a beautiful discovery. I hope scientists see this and give this idea a thought. Good job fellow being 😊✌️

[@Shutyourmouth20]

You do know bisexuality is homosexuality as well as heterosexuality right? It’s generally the same psychologically.

[@dr.rodolfolopez7007]

very beautiful explanation, thank you.

[@greynoodles6784]

this video is underrated

[@Joy-mw8gz]

Thank you for giving us this piece of information. Clearly well explained.

[@lorenzoplaserrano8734]

I would love to read the studies. So interesting

[@ZarrysLux]

learned so much

[@phillipharris7285]

And while I thankyou for a much needed explanation of this matter the average person will never hear or understand this talk. I started to think we accept.physical differences why is it such a leap to understand differences in the the way people's brains develop?

[@Mallutripscooks]

Great talk Sir

[@viveksingh-sf6ye]

If yes then where can these test be performed?

[@littlejellyfish7]

what would be the pattern of amydgala in bisexuals?

[@payelmanna8258]

Wow

[@lindaeissa3669]

But... How come I used to be just into men and now I'm more into women..? Which brain do I have in this case? Lol

[@travfeed8694]

That's because of the phenotype- interweaving of genome and the environment. Essentiallising just one factor won't give answers to these mysterious questions.

[@vardets1032]

thats how bisexuality works

[@herweirdoo0904]

A broken brain

[@vikasbavdane7140]

Very nice

[@vardets1032]

yeah how is 90% of this related to the topic

[@iamthevengeance4766]

Not science

[@kittycake1294]

How is it not science exactly?

[@jesusiskingofkingslordoflo6727]

1 Timothy 6:20 “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:” Homosexuality Ephesians 5:11-12 11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. 12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. Romans 1:26-27 “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:” “And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.” Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. 1 Corinthians 6:9-13 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. 12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.

[@kittycake1294]

This man is Indian, pretty sure he’s not Christian. And even if he was, Science doesn’t care about your God’s feeling, it cares about finding facts and this is the facts.

[@rararawr658]

You must have hated to here the actual truth from this man

[@realdavebob]

just… no.

[@mmj9395]

Keep speaking the truth in love, sister Darlene.

[@ghostagent3552]

@@mmj9395 so much love, definitely no hate here

[@mmj9395]

I've heard of poor science, but this is next level poor science.

[@kittycake1294]

How is this poor science exactly?

[@malayamigo]

@@kittycake1294 probably because it lacks miracles and giant leaps of faith. They're not used to content like this so they think it's wrong. Add a few unicorns, resurrections and an invisible man on the moon stalking us all....then they'll probably agree it's good science. Probably. Ever tried explaining the concept of time to a kid? They'll say you're wrong and walk away. It's not because they're arrogant, they're just not able to understand the content.

[@nashxz5581]

You call this science 😂😂😂😂

[@ghostagent3552]

Better than arguing with so-called "woke" people I guess.

[@kittycake1294]

How is this not science? You’re saying you, a random commenter whose knowledge of science probably comes from high school, knows more than an actual researcher?

[@user-ml5tn3en1y]

Yes.

[@matthewsteele5229]

Yeah man. This is science. Probably best left to the experts, not internet edge lords.