Really helpful. Couldn't understand moles at all but now I can happily battle through them. Great light hearted video and love the layout too.
@exooppa7696 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH LIKE YOU'VE SAVED MY LIFE FOR TOMORROW
@originalsoundtracks52635 жыл бұрын
omgg same
@thatoom18923 жыл бұрын
@TempoRyZe same.😂😭
@Midhuns_World.. Жыл бұрын
Well same , after 4 years
@73624. Жыл бұрын
Well same after 5 years
@MariadzLopez5 жыл бұрын
Why haven’t I discovered this video sooner! God bless youuuuu I literally understood everything 😂
@laibakhan38435 жыл бұрын
I FINALLY UNDERSTAND!!! THANK YOU!!!
@louisehunt37895 жыл бұрын
oh my gosh where has this been my whole life?!
@SuperMarine-uk2wp Жыл бұрын
got my gcse chem mock tomorrow, this explained it better in 12 minutes than many hours of lessons dedicated to moles. thanks!
@FloralhattieX5 жыл бұрын
Revision=done for my chemistry GcSE tommorow- never understood this In class thank you ❤️❤️
@claraishungry5013 жыл бұрын
how did it gooo
@lichh646 жыл бұрын
I wish you were my teacher!
@Jak-ub3ds5 жыл бұрын
Surprised this only has 10k views, very helpful
@sx4fa2 жыл бұрын
i'm going to cry. thank you so much. i've never understood this even though ive gotten all my teachers to explain it - but you've just helped me so much. you're amazing. thank you!!!!
@jawatu63262 жыл бұрын
Good luck for tommorow
@sx4fa2 жыл бұрын
@@jawatu6326 thank you! you too. :)
@jawatu63262 жыл бұрын
@@sx4fa are you ready?
@katiemcmanus58425 жыл бұрын
Best science videos ever ! Free science lessons has nothing on this
@ionamacmillan23475 жыл бұрын
After being taught for years and not understanding one 12min video has got me sorted. Life saver for my exam!!!
@Yurmum55 Жыл бұрын
Got the exam tomorrow., thank you !!
@nevermind42785 жыл бұрын
OMG thanx u saved my life for my chemistry test tomorrow. 😊😊😊
@allisony.87182 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video for me, as a self study student. Although the guys is like story telling and his presentation isn't like textbook, this video just helps me remember by understanding and I don't have to just cram the calculation methods into my head
@woosy47665 жыл бұрын
Im doing my double award chemistry gcse tomorrow and Im absolutely sh*tting myself and Im so thankful for your videos!
@woosy47662 жыл бұрын
@@ramez_357 C* bud
@aurignyfrench97802 жыл бұрын
This video is amazing! Now I feel much more confident going into my test tomorrow!!! Would reccomend to anyone struggling with moles and mass etc!
@secretcoffeeaddict94375 жыл бұрын
this video made this topic so much easier to understand!!
@softandsticky8438 Жыл бұрын
i have my chemistry gcse in 2 hours and your videos have helped me so much the last few days, thank you so much
@sasasasa-3 жыл бұрын
THANK YOUUU MY TEACHER TAUGHT IT TOO FAST AND I GOT CONFUSED WATCHING THIS MADE IT CLEARER
@whoskiloo5 жыл бұрын
Better Than KZbinr primrose kitten by far
@ScienceShorts5 жыл бұрын
High praise! 😊
@murugesusivakumar25064 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, this was so helpful for my revision. I will definitely remember the formula for moles because of the grams rams thing.
@happypants61505 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!! you are so much better than my teacher!
@ronthebear66565 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a clear explanation. Finally I get this
@upasnakarthik57785 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooo much for this video. A real LIFE SAVER.. sending love 💕💕
@kaydincathey3 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, sir! And your accent is awesome!👍😄
@NM148253 жыл бұрын
thankyou reall y helped with my understanding of this i watched other videos but they were really complicated :)
@radiyahhh5 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH explained it so so so well!!
@nikazain64985 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much🙏❤️
@orlawatson69165 жыл бұрын
This was great thank you sooo much!
@user-rx6kg3yl9v Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, I have a mock tomorrow and this has really helped me out!
@YES-nn1rg2 жыл бұрын
Truly YOU are the besttttttttt❤❤❤❤❤
@aldanyiu43525 жыл бұрын
Thank you.... really bad at doing moles before
@transgrl5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I understand it now, actually feels easy aswell now!
@azkieran30306 жыл бұрын
this is hard bur you expladed it well
@itsalex10105 жыл бұрын
yh he "expladed" it rllly well
@Unknown-wi8yv5 жыл бұрын
r/ihadastroke
@nesrinahmed20694 жыл бұрын
Wowwww better than my teacher Can you cover igcse grade 9 chemistry
@iamthebystander1937 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this,got a test tomorrow and I forgot how to do quantitative chemistry
@muzammilshiraazi53634 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for helping me out
@fishmcfish38505 жыл бұрын
Thank Jeebus someone can explain it in English. My chemistry teacher has been off for 4 months and supply teachers aren't very good at teaching.
@AmayaW36 жыл бұрын
Very helpful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@JD-nl7mf3 жыл бұрын
3:18 I thought relative formula mass was for ionic compounds?
@amandanorman3244 жыл бұрын
This really made sense to me thank you and a great way to remember the calculations. I used the method for an AQA GCSE practice question but it seems they didn't use the balanced equation given in the question but the unbalanced equation. I'm confused now.....is it different for different courses?
@noelle41453 жыл бұрын
I think you need to balance the equation yourself, in some situations they won’t give it to you balanced.
@musicchannel35253 жыл бұрын
@@noelle4145 thank you
@pantherplayz83902 жыл бұрын
I know
@archiehickling73115 жыл бұрын
This really helped, thank you so much
@vanila69232 жыл бұрын
im so glad i found your youtube channel because you have helped me out so much!!! thank you!!
@rudythorns84115 жыл бұрын
i was really thankful for ths vid thanks ! :)
@tiarnanmckeever79454 жыл бұрын
thank you man i didn’t understand this
@avarose7556 Жыл бұрын
I learnt more from this than my actual chemistry lessons in school
@orlawatson69165 жыл бұрын
Please can you do Titration calc Neutralisation calc Gases and solutions calc Atom economy % yield
@ScienceShorts5 жыл бұрын
Definitely!
@aizanadeem9635 жыл бұрын
Yes please real quick no time
@anthoniamills4 жыл бұрын
New subscribers honestly I didn’t understand it and I hv Test Tomo but now I do thanks so much 💞🎉
@ScienceShorts4 жыл бұрын
All the best for it!
@maxwellman71922 жыл бұрын
really good video, helped me understand moles and the whole idea pretty clearly
@ayethirah5 жыл бұрын
your videos are so helpful❤️
@aoifesalamone93022 жыл бұрын
i love this BUT HE WROTE IN BLACK SHARPIE ON A WHITEBOARD??? THAT DOESNT RUB OFF apart from that very helpful
@ScienceShorts2 жыл бұрын
It's paper, dude.
@ShadowX_4913 жыл бұрын
I unfortunately didn’t understand the last bit Like the 2nd worked ex after the part where you got moles of the reactant Could you somehow make the explanation a bit simpler
@coolfred90835 жыл бұрын
#protons
@oliviak80815 жыл бұрын
i think you rounded moles of iron (iii) oxide form 1.875 to 1.88 and that changed the result because i didn't and in the end i got 210 tonnes not 211
@originalsoundtracks52635 жыл бұрын
there will be a range
@_._7902 жыл бұрын
Hello, can you explain the non-directional of ionic bonds and directional of covalent bonds please? I don't understand this logic, thanks a lot!
@hardyultra323 жыл бұрын
You are simply amazing!!!
@Bumbleboobeee Жыл бұрын
life savior ong
@Lyricfact0ry2.02 жыл бұрын
My exam i tmmrw and u hv saved me
@HeisenburgJehangiri Жыл бұрын
Helped me a lot. Thanks!!!
@jensonstretch971 Жыл бұрын
S tier content
@Ebonyrose1401 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much this was so helpful!!!
@iconichisoka76423 жыл бұрын
this tutorial ate 👁
@oliviahyde4765 жыл бұрын
more examples of moles at the end plz
@datonebro6132 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@shariksh2293 жыл бұрын
You are a Great teacher
@advaybandaram40272 жыл бұрын
bro ur the best
@oyehoyesyaapa5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, thank you ever so much
@niliniri18355 жыл бұрын
but seriously,thank you
@frogtears2 жыл бұрын
watching on the bus on the way to my chemistry gcse 😭😭
@tanishka74703 жыл бұрын
hey, can you plsssss make a video on stoichiometry as soon as you can since my exams are near and i dont know anything
@ScienceShorts3 жыл бұрын
Stoichiometry is just the ratio of one reactant/product to another 😊
@tanishka74703 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceShorts oohhh. Thanks
@sforstunner4 жыл бұрын
this was great!
@jc-15543 жыл бұрын
GRAMS OVER RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Hypermuseic-vr3zk2 жыл бұрын
Thanks you for this!!
@sansamman46196 жыл бұрын
10:58 , we had ( Fe2 ) in the reactant then, we had ( 2Fe ) in the product, doesn't that make a difference? { I didn't even know what computational chemistry was, this is my introduction to it. So, forgive me if this is a silly question... )
@sourmango47605 жыл бұрын
in the case of balancing equations it does not make a difference as the no. of Fe going in is the same as the number of Fe going out. Also dont ever ask for an apology if you want to know something everyone had to start somewhere
@itsalex10105 жыл бұрын
@@sourmango4760 u seem like a nice guy
@Unknown-wi8yv5 жыл бұрын
San Samman there is no such thing as a stupid question
@haileighcurtis79135 жыл бұрын
very clarifying
@ashfaqunnaharnila48453 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!
@johnmccabe57615 жыл бұрын
I thought 2Fe and Fe2 both mean that there are 2 atoms of iron present? If so, your ‘ratio’ step wasn’t necessary.
@logandowie21293 жыл бұрын
Very good vid mate c
@ExertGames6 жыл бұрын
Can u do medical physics a2 aqa?
@ScienceShorts6 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry mate, not until at least next year.
@nbsgamer69175 жыл бұрын
isn't there a simpler way. I just did iron relative mass times 2 and divided it by the relative atomic mass of the Iron oxide and times it by 300 and I got 210 g
@ScienceShorts5 жыл бұрын
Congrats - you found the speedrun strat. Not everybody can deal.
@ayethirah5 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU i hope this will help me pass my chem exam tmr
@aequaria5 жыл бұрын
Good luck for chem
@yxuzii52884 жыл бұрын
ty professor
@slix5953 Жыл бұрын
at 3:39, why did you do oxygen twice? isn't it diatomic or is that not related to it?
@na_148 Жыл бұрын
Thanks❤️
@bushra.a6653 жыл бұрын
8:56 why don't we need to know the carbon?
@danielmuzani74662 жыл бұрын
do u already know the reason?i want to know too :(
@enochcore4 ай бұрын
@@danielmuzani7466 late reply but its because the question does not involve carbon in it so its pointless
@danielmuzani12354 ай бұрын
@@enochcoreblud im in college now
@kirollosromany8422 Жыл бұрын
thanks man
@jamesthejoker74152 жыл бұрын
Just a small query, for the last bit when we calculate the mass of Iron using the mole ratio, would the RAM not be 112 instead of 56 because on the formula it says “2Fe” so would you not multiply 56 by 2?
@hellobroskiwhatsgood Жыл бұрын
sorry this is so late BUT noooo! as basically you would only multiply by 2 if it is the subscript (e.g Fe2) hope that helps :) the reasoning is that some elements are di-atomic meaning they come in pairs of two for (as the prefix 'di' suggests) for example O2, and this is their original form as they do not have a full outer shell by nature and therefore form covalent bonds with another atom of themselves to get to one - oxygen is in group 6 meaning 6 outer shell electrons which makes sense as they would form one covalent bond meaning they share a pair of electrons, this in turn gives them 8. However other elements may not be di-atomic by nature so you are changing their properties by multiplying them by 2. You can however use the multiple in front to determine how many moles you have of each substance for instance if you have the equation 2Fe + 3O you would have a molar ratio of 2:3 you can use this to later discover the limiting reactant, so the one that is consumed first in the reaction, and limits the reaction when it is consumed. Once again hope this helped! sorry it is so long and late!!
@arfanrahman80403 жыл бұрын
Great!
@tanishka74703 жыл бұрын
also i want to share your vids withEVERYONE I KNOW
@PianoScenesMoviesandSeries5 жыл бұрын
1:15 Why did you use a dot for the first multiplication but an X for the second? Shouldn't it always be a dot in chemistry and physics?
@randomguy44885 жыл бұрын
its a decimal place, dots are never used as a multiplication symbol in the UK
@niliniri18355 жыл бұрын
Thank you,next
@najmzmohamed6684 жыл бұрын
thanks
@ScienceShorts4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@nessysamp20945 жыл бұрын
Legend I
@lichh646 жыл бұрын
To be honest I don't have a problem studying this topic, but thank you because lots of my friends are struggling with it!.
@ZhDKarma5 жыл бұрын
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
@lollos3468 Жыл бұрын
@@ZhDKarma his search history would say otherwise
@josh3476 Жыл бұрын
@@lollos3468 it’s been 4 years bro
@lollos3468 Жыл бұрын
@@josh3476 ik lmfao just thought it wld be funny
@miam.g4 жыл бұрын
8:09
@jelinsalin8154 жыл бұрын
2020 students where u at??
@bushra.a6653 жыл бұрын
2021
@Ben.A-Mella5 жыл бұрын
How is sodium 23?? And oxygen 16???
@chaosbeam60315 жыл бұрын
What do you mean? If you go to any periodic table of elements you can find that oxygen ( "O" in group 7) has an atomic mass of 16 and sodium ("Na" in group 1) has an atomic mass of 23!