Brian Cox - What's The Biggest Mystery in The Universe?

Brian Cox - What's The Biggest Mystery in The Universe?
SUBSCRIBE to "Science Time": / sciencetime24
English physicist and professor of particle physics Brian Cox explains some of the biggest mysteries in the universe.
Modern physics has given us a glimpse of what the true nature of the universe is. But there is still so much more to explore. One big mystery in science today is the The matter-antimatter asymmetry problem. But to better understand this complex issue we have grasp the nature of antimatter.
Brian Cox explains what antimatter is and how it's made at the LHC.
The Big Bang should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the early universe. But today, everything we see from the smallest life forms on Earth to the largest stellar objects, is made almost entirely of matter. Comparatively, there is not much antimatter to be found. Something must have happened to tip the balance. One of the greatest challenges in physics is to figure out what happened to the antimatter, or why we see an asymmetry between matter and antimatter.
Our universe is a beautiful, elegant and strange, mysterious place at the same time. It has baffled curious minds since the very first humans gazed into the night sky and wondered what's out there.
While physicists can confidently say what happened a billionth of a second after the big bang, the vast majority of the universe remains unknown. In fact, we only understand about 5% of the total composition of the universe, which is ordinary matter. The other 95% which consists of dark matter and dark energy, remains in the realm of unexplained cosmic phenomenon.
#universe #ProfBrianCox #science
Sources: • Brian Cox on Dark Matt...
• Brian Cox Lecture - GC...
• Brian Cox Neil deGrass...
"MIPIM 2013: Day one pic round up - Professor Brian Cox" by EG Focus is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

[@jeffhgv]

It’s also the engineering that goes behind all of these discoveries, that amazes me.

[@anthropocene-]

The moment one thinks he understood something, the things become even more compelling. That's the ever investigative nature of science that's fascinates me. And accepting we don't know some things yet is a first step towards greatness.

[@michaelbariso3192]

Newsflash...The light and images from the sun, stars, planets and galaxies have already reached earth, to say their light and images take time to reach earth or are in a past dimension of Einstein space-time is delusional :-) The Hubble and James Webb space telescopes do not have exposure times of 13.8 billion years, neither do our eyes. Objects in space move from their cordinates in real-time, images from the past cannot magically morph into the future as still images. Earthlings are stupid :-). If time light, images and mass are expanding-stretching with the universe at an increasingly faster rate, explain how you can measure distance or time if the speed of light is constant and limited to 186,000 mi./s. Explain how gravity can travel into the future from the past :-). More potential source energy would be needed for time light, images and mass to constantly travel at increased distances into the future, violating both the law of conservation of energy and basic common sense :-). The image of the molecule illustrates how the gravity of the ether is both a pulling and repelling force creating the phenomenon of red shift, wrongly theorized as an expanding universe. If the images you see in the universe were really in Earth's past, you wouldn't be able to see them because the past no longer exists. If an alien space telescope viewed Earth they'd have the common sense to know it's a planet that moves in real time orbiting it's sun, not an image from the past, as the past no longer exists. Conclusion, Earthlings are stupid :-). Delusion is characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs that contradict reality. If time light, images and mass are expanding-stretching with the universe at an increasingly faster rate, explain how you can measure distance or time if the speed of light is constant and limited to 186,000 mi./s. More potential source energy would be needed for time light, images and mass to constantly travel at increased distances into the future, violating both the law of conservation of energy and basic common sense 🙂. If the images you see in the universe were really in Earth's past, you wouldn't be able to see them because the past no longer exists. Delusion is characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs that contradict reality. Magnetron. You can follow the misadventures of the Space Cat on Twitter & Facebook. Ack ACK, End of transmission.

[@abhorrentheathen]

I could listen to Brian Cox all day. He's so knowledgeable and his voice is as soothing as a Bob Ross video 😌

[@stevekoehn1675]

Consciousness, the physics of consciousness is the greatest mystery that humbles all others

[@bg1616]

I sometimes wonder whether the names we give to things presupposes what it is and holds us back from the truth about it.

[@astro-blaster4190]

@@bg1616you mean constructs? Absolutely. There is no such things as time, calendars, math, days, years, colors..you could go all day. This is all made up constructs to live and run our lives by. Nature and the universe is far more complicated than anything we can grasp or think of. The constructs hold us back.

[@rishavkumar1263]

​@@bg1616Me too, but I think we must name it, because it won't change what it is. It's just we are unaware of it's true nature, which won't be affected by naming it.

[@bretta3]

It's mind blowing how complex the LHC is.

[@aenima1]

I was just thinking that. All those little wires and pieces, for thousands of feet. its insane

[@keekwai2]

It's not complex at all.

[@garypriestley3886]

There's a quote from the book "A Short History of Nearly Everything" by Bill Bryson that I love, "Two-thirds of the universe is missing from the balance sheet, we might as well call them DUNNOS - Dark Unknown Nonreflective Nondetectable Objects Somewhere" 😂

[@jeremyreid9582]

Great read.

[@ShankarAravind-tx1me]

One of the most entertaining books I have read.

[@likable72]

THANK YOU Brian Cox .

[@teddyrwilliam1428]

Allways enjoy Brian videos very interesting more please

[@shadowoffire4307]

We are at the very beginning of time for the human race. It is not unreasonable that we grapple with problems. But there are tens of thousands of years in the future. Our responsibility is to do what we can, learn what we can, improve the solutions, and pass them on. It is our responsibility to leave the people of the future a free hand. In the impetuous youth of humanity, we can make grave errors that can stunt our growth for a long time. This we will do if we say we have the answers now, so young and ignorant as we are. If we suppress all discussion, all criticism, proclaiming “This is the answer, my friends; man is saved!” we will doom humanity for a long time to the chains of authority, confined to the limits of our present imagination. It has been done so many times before. It is our responsibility as scientists, knowing the great progress which comes from a satisfactory philosophy of ignorance, the great progress which is the fruit of freedom of thought, to proclaim the value of this freedom; to teach how doubt is not to be feared but welcomed and discussed; and to demand this freedom as our duty to all coming generations. -richard p. Feynman

[@timfahey7127]

👍

[@shadowoffire4307]

@@timfahey7127 i always wonder What is this mysterious existence,this mysterious reality. And most mysterious of all this unique consiousness which like fingerprint only i can feel? And not others? Why it exits? Why only mine one in 8 Billion exits? Why not other consiousness in my brain?

[@johngregory8103]

What an enlightening philosophy from Richard Feynman. If we all lived by those ideas we can still have real hope for the future of knowledge and human development. I'll sign up to Feynman World view without question

[@shadowoffire4307]

@@johngregory8103 i always wonder What is this mysterious existence,this mysterious reality. And most mysterious of all this unique consiousness which like fingerprint only i can feel? And not others? Why it exits? Why only mine one in 8 Billion exits? Why not other consiousness in my brain? can you shed some me light and express your opinion on this.

[@tomward2688]

@@shadowoffire4307 In a nutshell, the answer to your question is simply that all creatures on this planet have been designed by Nature as self-contained entities that are each and every one caught up in a universal struggle for survival and adaptation in a Darwinian process of natural selection; and that is how things stand, like it or lump it. Hope that has to some degree answered your question.

[@steeleye2112]

Our best theory atm is QFT which is based on a fabric of the universe having multiple values at every point in space and interacting. What is this fabric and what allows it to have values. And if you answered that, what would that thing be made of. So the biggest mystery is that nothing is fundamental and components are made of other things for infinity. As well as going on for infinity in space and time as well. My head hurts, I'm gonna watch Love Island and have a nap.

[@STOICZZZ]

But if infinity is comprised of infinite variations and/or derivatives of components where these components themselves have infinite compositions when defining just one portion of a very specific point of the fabric of space and time of an infinite number of galaxies spanning across the 1 universe we reside in that is forever expanding and science states the possibility of multiple if not an infinite number of universes existing...add a dash of quantum physics and time, effectively cancelling out any notions of understanding origins and endings....wouldn't everything be nothing and nothing is infinity, all matter is nothing...the perpetual and incalculable nothingness of everything ......Or maybe.....hows this Love Island u speak of? I brokadid my brain things 🤯😵🤔😏🛌💤 naptime sounds good lol (this run on sentence is infinite 🤦💪 screw you grammar lol "comment" section not "comma" section)

[@steeleye2112]

@@STOICZZZ Yeah and as we are finite, finite divided by infinity is nothing so we don't exist. That's why I'm sticking to Love Island, it's real, it's made of shit so I know what it smells like and what it should look like and frankly that will do till I can get pissed again.

[@STOICZZZ]

@@steeleye2112 but now...the real mystery...is the shit real or just another nonexistent part of the infinite void...the shit is technically a product/part of us 💩...and if we don't exist....fuhhhhhhh when's the boat departing lol

[@STOICZZZ]

@@steeleye2112 hurry this shit along JWST lol all these do-dads and ur just doin Hubble 2.0, stop playin lol (I was thinking the other day, yea I know I shouldn't lol but if since when we look further out we are seeing images of the past hypothetically if Voyager could still relay back to Earth an image of Earths position way the F out there, wouldn't it be seeing an older image of Earth? And if so, wouldn't that mean at the edge of the observable universe, which has clearly been deduced, there wouldn't be...us...? But how can that be if we can "see" back and forth..GDI!! LOL how can something be constant and static "Time" is so effed logically lol)

[@ANDROLOMA]

Fabric is composed of quantum foam. So they say.

[@jasoncox7783]

I love watching anything about the universe with professor Brian Cox.ive watch of his space programs like wonders of the solar system and wonders if the universe the planets then universe worth watching

[@alex79suited]

Great video

[@graceygrumble]

My brain hurts when trying to understand this, yet I still find the bits I can understand fascinating.

[@philharmer198]

Keep on trying to understand ! What you do understand will grow .

[@mirekslechta7161]

Your brain hurts, because professor is talking like he knew most of it, In reality he knows just a bit more than any of us...means , almost nothing compare to all of universe´s secrets

[@graceygrumble]

@@mirekslechta7161 I feel as though he's the kind of bloke who would *love* to be proven wrong. It would excite him. He would be the first to say, "The more you know, the more you know you don't know", but he knows a hell of a lot more than me! Granted, that's not hard, because I dropped studying physics when I was 14! I might not have done so, if Brian Cox had been my teacher.

[@mirekslechta7161]

@@graceygrumble Someone who did not proof vast number of his own statements would never prove those statements to be correct by a simple fact, that nobody proved those statements to be wrong. That is my opinion.

[@graceygrumble]

@@mirekslechta7161 It's mine, too. I understand that 'proofs' only exist in mathematics and logic, not science. Scientific theories can be tested and *proven* to be wrong, though. Newton's laws of motion, combined with his law of gravity, have allowed us to predict how the solar system works. They seem to be correct, which is why we have been able to go to the moon, put satellites in orbit and see further into the universe - which are no mean feats, even with an incomplete understanding.

[@jakemoeller7850]

Particle Fever is one of my favorite documentaries! I am hoping that the LHC and future machines will unlock and showcase more of this beautiful universe.

[@jamescaley9942]

I fear "particle fever" in physics is more about unlocking more research grants.

[@classicalphysic]

@@jamescaley9942 Exactly James. I’m surprised Brian’s acolytes didn’t remove your reply!! What CERN fails to accept is that ALL the observed so called “particle” paths in colliders can also be very accurately modeled by waves of emr emitted by the proton magnetic fields during proton collisions. And intersecting with other waves from adjacent protons. In fact computer simulations show that 3 overlapping expanding wavefronts ( expanding as “bubbles” in 3Dimensions) can model,all know “particle” paths. Including pos/neg ‘neutrino’ paths , spiral paths, curved and straight paths. Proof that mathematically at least one doesn’t need to assume particle paths were made only by imaginary particles. But rather by waves of emr being emitted during proton-proton collisions.

[@gww5385]

@@classicalphysic CERN are intent on discovering (opening?) other dimensions by manipulating the Higgs field. The whole operation is a massive waste of intellectual talent, benefiting a select few whose goals remain hidden.

[@philharmer198]

While they are doing this , in another department of physics , they will find quantum propulsion .

[@pritamde12]

Awesome graphics

[@Connections87]

Just finished watching INTERSTELLAR now watching this! ABSOLUTELY MIND BLOWING! 🤯🤯

[@keekwai2]

You'll never be enlightened.

[@SchroderCat]

Brian Cox reminds me of Carl Sagan - they both have a gift for explaining science to non-scientists.

[@faizanrana2998]

Brain is like 7 eleven. Sagan was like whole food

[@johngregory8103]

Unfair. Different styles and different times. Brian Cox does a brilliant job of it as did Carl Sagan. Why always an obsession with comparisons and who is better?his name is Brian by the way... Not Brain

[@mathmandrsam]

Perhaps Cox is the solution to addressing the questions of the Flat Earth community

[@henrikduende]

Something that bothers me a lot the older i get is the fact that like 99,9 of us will never SEE What the universe looks like being IN the actuall universe. We see all these pics but we might not realise that we are like a grain of sand in size compared to the stuff in the pictures

[@norfolknchance.500]

Are we? ..... You state yourself that we cannot see this for ourselves, so you are basing everything on dogma!?

[@TheScentofmusic]

I have the similar view. Because we are so tiny in the universe much smaller than an ant 🐜 so we will never be able to understand fully what is this universe or universes around us.

[@timothyxosullivan]

Probably less than a grain of sand.

[@rahatahmed6188]

@@timothyxosullivana lot less than that

[@grahamf695]

When I was at school, we talked about “the fudge factor”. This was the number by which you had to multiply your answer, so that it matched the correct answer at the back of the text book. How do we know that dark matter and dark energy are not simply fudge factors, because our equations are slightly incorrect?

[@keithnicholas]

we don't. Some physicists are looking for dark matter in terms of particles, and some are looking at it from new physics, better equations that describe gravity to account for it. It's just, at the moment particles look more likely, as the equation based approach has to take a lot of leaps that are hard to justify. But it's an open question. As for Dark Energy, it's no that our equations are incorrect, its the observation of phenomena and we don't know why, ie, the universe is accelerating in its expansion, driven by some unknown process ( dark energy )

[@grahamf695]

@@keithnicholas that’s very interesting. Thanks for taking the trouble to answer my question.

[@keekwai2]

FFS! SO DUMB. LOL

[@stevesheroan4131]

If I could have the DEEP THOUGHT computer answer one single question (and NOT get an answer of 42) it would be: "Is there, or has there ever been, life anywhere in the Universe with which I could have or can communicate in some reasonably tangible way?" Perhaps semantically that qualifies as more than one question, but I'd throw it out there anyway.

[@jeremyreid9582]

I really appreciate Mr. Brian Cox’s down-to-earth casual manner with which he explains the subject. Sadly, a lot of ‘intelligent’ persons tend to talk down to us ‘normal’ people (Neil de Gras Tyson comes to mind, amongst others)

[@2002daverj]

Professor Cox has a way of delivering this stuff in an interesting way.

[@Heart2HeartBooks]

He is very much in love with the sound of his own voice.

[@AVIARYCOURT]

@@Heart2HeartBooks And BBC cheques!

[@tomward2688]

Yes, I'm reliably informed that he performs these KZbin voice-overs in the nude!

[@tomward2688]

@@Heart2HeartBooks Fortunately for him, he doesn't appear to have been saddled with the Oldham accent! (As a point of minor interest to readers of this, his family home is about a couple of hundred yards as the crow flies from my sister's house in Chadderton, Oldham.)

[@kevinmurray5606]

I'm going to see him tonight in Dublin can't wait

[@childfreesingleandatheist8899]

How did it go?

[@kevinmurray5606]

@@childfreesingleandatheist8899 it was awesome

[@markberman6708]

What if, in certain specific situations and places within the universe a spacecraft could scoop antimatter to recharge its engines and ride a wave path to the next scoop pathway like a gas station to get to a given far, far destination. This would imply that antimatter exist and performs in some ways not yet understood, but is not unconquerable but can be used as fuel once we can find those place where it concentrates and build engines and craft the go beyond our current paradigms of understanding.

[@frankjohnson8750]

B4 I start watching this one from Dr. Cox, I'm not sure which ONE is the biggest mystery but my top 3 are, what is dark matter? What is dark energy? And what exactly is gravity? ... I'm thinking that if we ever learn exactly what gravity is, the other 2 will fall into place also 🤔. I feel like Einstein's gravity may be as incomplete as Newton's was, compared to Einstein's. I'm no theoretical physist though.😐 2 cents worth... If I HAD to pick one most mysterious mystery ofall, it would have to be, what exactly is gravity. 🙋My vote cast. And I think that once we figure that out, we would, very soon thereafter, have our way of getting around the universe VERY quickly, if not instantaneously...? 🤷 Navigation will be the challenge, certainly through space, maybe even time.

[@1SpudderR]

Two great unknowns....Gravity....And?......Consciousness!? “Linked?”- Two great mysteries.....96% Known unknowns.....4% Known Of Which we know 0.0001%!? Still someway to go then? But I will keep watching, for Einstein Two’s appearances.

[@LouDeeCruz]

@@1SpudderR Don’t listen to Brian. He and the people at CERN fantasise about a Big Bang universe where the entire observable ipuniverseuniverse of trillions and trillions of galaxies...used to be compressed into a space smaller than the head of a pin!! And they did this because Edwin Hubble proved in 1929 thst light did lose frequency over distance. Contrary to,Einsteins photon model. But because the Brian Cox’s of the day had already pinned their reputations onto Alberts naff theory of photons...they invented the Big Bang religion.

[@itsjustme8554]

Consciousness is the top mystery to me

[@21MWTF]

For me there are 2 questions: 1) Is consciousness fundamental? 2) Is our universe a simulation?

[@oldtimer2192]

Our consciousness is a result of the “potential” simulation?

[@dereklyons1533]

The Matrix

[@stewiesaidthat]

If the universe is a simulation, what universe is the simulation in?

[@AtSzalkai]

Consciousness is a physical process, our type of it requires special computing nodes like neurons, and special recurring connections among them. Similarly, as a star is also a very special process with special components and structure.

[@craigthescott5074]

There would be no reason to make the universe this massive if we were in a simulation and we can’t get too 99.9 % of it.

[@MustyX]

Who is the speaker? Humble voice, huge knowledge.

[@oubliette862]

do the numbers change with distance and duration? if the universe were half its current size further back in time and we were there to observe things would it still be 4 percent known 96 unknown?

[@nmarbletoe8210]

actually it would be different! By density, there would be 8x less dark energy, 8x more matter, and ... 16x (?) more energy in the cmb photons. So that would result in a higher % known, if i'm not out to lunch.

[@oubliette862]

@@nmarbletoe8210 whatever it is that there's more of currently should account for what missing then. the only thing I know of is space time itself. so, the rest is basically the expanding spacetime that all the matter exists within. I wish I were smarter lol.

[@keekwai2]

That Shift key just requires too much mental energy, ay? lol

[@sinebar]

Dark matter is locked up in spacetime itself. Kind of the way photons are locked up in electromagnetism. Dark matter can't be observe directly. The only way to observe it is to create gravitational waves with enough energy, that it radiates dark matter in the form of gravitons or some other kind of particle. Anyway that's my theory on dark matter.

[@scotlanddaytrips6397]

My theory is that there's no such thing. It was invented to explain galactic acceleration, which souldn't be happening in the Big Bang model.

[@lange71krakapoi9]

Finally ! what a relief !

[@fruitsandveges2892]

@@scotlanddaytrips6397 explain

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

Hello Christine, I have just posted a coment back to ' Brian ', that may interest you as follows. Hello Brian, I have tried to contact you in the past, but have never had a reply. I have been working on an hypothesis for an alternative to the standard model, which could explain the ' Dark Matter ', ' Dark Energy ', and gravity, amongst other things. I believe that the reasson you are unable to find the particles you are looking for is because you are looking for the wrong type of particle. I believe that all of the so called particles making up the table of particles in the standard model, are man-made, or really just pieces of atomic matter broken off of the atom. In my hypothesis, I propose a model that is simple and logical, where everything in the universe is composed of just two incredibly small particles. One is a negatively charged monopole particle called a ' Harveytron ', which fills every available empty space between the nucleus and the outer boundary of the atom, and every available empty space throughout the universe in a cloud. This is the missing mass of the universe, and is 'Dark Matter '. It is the only field or medium filling space, and provides a medium through which electromagnetic radiation and shock waves ( gravitational waves ) can trave through space. It will be seen that these negatively charged particles will be trying to push each other apart in every direction, and as such there exists a negative force of repulsion throughout the universe. This force of repulsion is the 'Dark Energy ', is a possible reason for the explantion of the universe and is one of the two forces of gravity, which I believe consists of a force of both attraction and repulsion. The second particle is a corresponding positively charged monopole particle called a ' Dannytron ', which in combination forms all of the nuclei making up all of the nuclear physical matter in the universe. The possitvely charged particles contained in this physical matter, provideds the second attractive force of gravity. Together or alone , they make up everything that exists in the universe. In my hypothesis, I explain how these particles interact in a more logical alternative model to that of the standard model, which will also unify all fields of physics and could answer many of the oustanding questions in physics today. I am happy to send a copy of my hypothesis to you, if you were interested. I do believe you would find it of some interest to you. If not, it may give you the satifaction of proving me wrong. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

[@rozzgrey801]

@@tonymarshharveytron1970 "I believe that all of the so called particles making up the table of particles in the standard model, are man-made, or really just pieces of atomic matter broken off of the atom" I expect Brian got that far and fell off his chair laughing. Your type (Dunning_Kruger effecters) have such an absurdly arrogant sense of entitlement, expecting a busy scientist to wade through all your half-baked bullshit ideas.

[@aliceinwonderland887]

The biggest of all mysteries is consciousness. Inarguably, it is primary. "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." -Max Planck "We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter. -Max Planck." ""The world is a construct of our sensations, perceptions, memories. It is convenient to regard it as existing objectively on its own. But it certainly does not become manifest by its mere existence." -Erwin Schrodinger

[@ANDROLOMA]

So far, there is no evidence that there is one site for consciousness, which leads experts to believe that it is truly a collective neural effort. *"The central requirement for conscious experience is a perception of self that can be integrated with information from the physical and social environment and information from past experience. The basis for a perception of self derives from the huge amount of somatosensory and visceral information that comes from all parts of the body. In the CNS of all vertebrates, this information is used for motor control, and for homeostatic regulation. This afferent information goes to appropriate control and and regulatory systems in the brainstem and forebrain."* -Life (The Science of Biology) Ninth Edition, Sadava, Hillis, Heller, Berenbaum

[@aliceinwonderland887]

@@ANDROLOMA Everything we call matter is made of empty space held together by vibrating fields of energy. "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." - Nikola Tesla

[@havenbastion]

Mind is a metaphor for the patterns in the brain. The conscious mind is a subset of mind that can be intentionally accessed. Awareness is the momentary pattern of the conscious mind, and consciousness is the continuity of that awareness over time.

[@sahttr_5097]

Thanks, there are all beautiful

[@aliceinwonderland887]

@Kisa Vorobianinov I really feel stupid after trying to figure what that nonsense means. I am not interested in explanation save it.

[@epicon6]

6:20 It's cool that the Millenium Falcon is used for science 🎉

[@ricardopelc-wesoly3483]

Understanding our place and purpose in the Universe.

[@steelersgoingfor7706]

Do black holes transform ordinary matter and energy into another form that we can't perceive directly but can measure the affects of? Not likely, but something like, "whatever falls into black holes is what causes the expansion of the universe." We don't know why space itself expands, so maybe once energy/matter goes through the process of being devoured becomes another form in a higher or lower dimension and somehow inflates space itself?

[@markyoung9497]

-Blackholes are made of Neutrons compacted so tightly that it strips Nuetrons Electrons from the Atom. No name for this matter has yet been officially delared bu most in the know call it Quantum Neutronium. The expansion of the Universe is we now believe called the Vacume Effect. Matter will fall/be sucked into a vacume at exponential rates governed by the vacumes size and strength. This is why we see the expansion speeding up the further we observe.

[@AllknowingUnknown]

"...like... blowing up a balloon with too much air!"

[@janelleharmer7828]

Maybe once Matter enters a black hole it becomes spacetime

[@jcole1679]

We know why space is expanding. We don't know why it's accelerating.

[@stellarwind1946]

Black holes are what happens when an unstoppable force (gravity) meets an immovable object (matter)

[@Myviewoftheworldful]

That’s great Mr. Cox and thank you for that detailed answer but my question was would you like eat in or take away?

[@Charles-zd9mj]

Huh?

[@mallrat77]

Leave the comedy to the pros ya melt

[@lionroar26]

Drivel, he didn't explain anything

[@thewren01]

People say stuff like that about Néill gé Grasse Tyson, Not Brian Cox. Good try though. Bet you thought your were a STAR

[@jimmycrosby]

Lester, do you have letters after your name...DIV ?

[@Deepak-lc4gw]

Keep going

[@davidcasagrande267]

The biggest mystery in the universe is why do hotdog makers put 10 dogs in a package while hot dog roll makers put 8 rolls in a package.

[@dogwithwigwamz.7320]

I suppose the biggest mystery in the universe depends upon whom one asks the question to or whom is asking the question.

[@keekwai2]

No, dummy. It depends on the number of people asking the same question. duh.

[@user-rl5nd3ys8p]

Curious as to when our Earth eventually obtained all it’s current elements, and in which order. Presumably at some point some elements must have been absent

[@STOICZZZ]

.....what do you mean by "our Earth".....? Sneaking around the cosmos, having existence with some sleezy other Earth? Or...you're an alien...trying to speak human...which if that's the case...WELCOME TO EARTH!! 👍😄 (...leave while you can...take me with you please...this place is insane... ) 😏😅

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@STOICZZZ alien: "Please Take us to your Lithium"

[@STOICZZZ]

@@nmarbletoe8210 StoicZ: not until u give me ur technology. U only gave me the ability to speak with u apparently. Lame. And Nirvana broke up awhile ago anyway....hopefully u aliens get that reference, cuz I'm sure lots of earthlings right now wouldn't....what's that aliens? Hell yea, take me with u!!! Btw aliens....N Marbletoe has all the Lithium...just sayin..

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@STOICZZZ Aliens invited the hot springs, open to the public 6am to 10pm. The upstream set of three pools have the most lithium, they say... Like the ocean, hot spring minerals are tonic to carbon-based nerves

[@sipplix]

I wonder if in the collision of matter and anti matter, a third neutral type of matter was created and as it built up it had a slight effect on the reaction between matter and antimatter causing an imbalance and leaving only a small amount of matter no antimatter and a large amount of this neutral matter?

[@lukasbaumgartner2240]

Matter and antimatter do cause annihilation upon collision.

[@Norpan506]

@@lukasbaumgartner2240 Is antimatter even a real thing?

[@sipplix]

@@Norpan506 yes it is.

[@starfishsystems]

@@Norpan506 When we were kids it was like super trippy, but it's nothing more than particle pairs which carry an opposite electrical charge but have otherwise identical properties. Nowadays it's just a slice through the Standard Model, barely remarkable except for the residual and of course interesting question of why we don't find approximately equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe as we would expect.

[@keekwai2]

No. We can see "what is created". A massive explosion of thermal energy. duh.

[@ryantrimble6551]

so extremely large that we can not even imagine it and with so many parts we are without the ability to consider the smallest number of them.

[@keekwai2]

We? lol

[@John_259]

"I am both terrified and reassured to know that there are still wonders in the universe, that we have not yet explained everything." - G'Kar, Babylon 5

[@AVIARYCOURT]

"And so it begins..." Loved Babylon 5 ,those Shadows.Phew !

[@promax1001]

All of the wonders of the universe can be found in the Bible. If you read it they will be revealed.

[@modestdaddy2000]

Babylon 5 is more real than god. Don’t come here and spread falsehoods when many people come here to learn. You’ll confuse them, just as you are.

[@antie4ie]

For me.. Most Mystery is what is it like BEFORE the Universe.

[@TaylorWeston]

But what if the universe is eternal and has always been?

[@edk484]

John 1 In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.....simple

[@childfreesingleandatheist8899]

@Ed K: Yeah, that must be true, because the Bible says so, smh.

[@54spatula]

@@edk484Ah right. Because you said that it must be true, right, got ya.

[@edk484]

@@54spatula no, not because I said something.....it is the Word of God....God speaks. The first time God says something in the bible is in Genesis... Genesis 1:3 and God SAID :" let there be light " and there was light...You see ? Simple

[@philholman8520]

Wonderful video. Thanks for sharing! 👍✌️🇬🇧

[@ScienceTime24]

Thanks for watching

[@tyamada21]

A segment from 'Saved by the Light of the Buddha Within'... My new understandings of what many call 'God -The Holy Spirit' - resulting from some of the extraordinary ongoing awakenings since my NDE... Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the three-part 'Great Universal Mystic Law' and the identity of what some scientists are now referring to as the unified field of consciousnesses. In other words, it’s the essence of all existence and non-existence - the ultimate creative force behind planets, stars, nebulae, people, animals, trees, fish, birds, and all phenomena, manifest or latent. All matter and intelligence are simply waves or ripples manifesting to and from this core source. Consciousness (enlightenment) is itself the actual creator of everything that exists now, ever existed in the past, or will exist in the future - right down to the minutest particles of dust - each being an individual ripple or wave. The big difference between chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo and most other conventional prayers is that instead of depending on a ‘middleman’ to connect us to our state of inner enlightenment, we’re able to do it ourselves. That’s because chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo allows us to tap directly into our enlightened state by way of this self-produced sound vibration. ‘Who or What Is God?’ If we compare the concept of God being a separate entity that is forever watching down on us, to the teachings of Nichiren, it makes more sense to me that the true omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of what most people perceive to be God, is the fantastic state of enlightenment that exists within each of us. Some say that God is an entity that’s beyond physical matter - I think that the vast amount of information continuously being conveyed via electromagnetic waves in today’s world gives us proof of how an invisible state of God could indeed exist. For example, it’s now widely known that specific data relayed by way of electromagnetic waves has the potential to help bring about extraordinary and powerful effects - including an instant global awareness of something or a mass emotional reaction. It’s also common knowledge that these invisible waves can easily be used to detonate a bomb or to enable NASA to control the movements of a robot as far away as the Moon or Mars - none of which is possible without a receiver to decode the information that’s being transmitted. Without the receiver, the data would remain impotent. In a very similar way, we need to have our own ‘receiver’ switched on so that we can activate a clear and precise understanding of our own life, all other life and what everything else in existence is. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day helps us to achieve this because it allows us to reach the core of our enlightenment and keep it switched on. That’s because Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what scientists now refer to as the unified field of consciousnesses. To break it down - Myoho represents the Law of manifestation and latency (Nature) and consists of two alternating states. For example, the state of Myo is where everything in life that’s not obvious to us exists - including our stored memories when we’re not thinking about them - our hidden potential and inner emotions whenever they’re dormant - our desires, our fears, our wisdom, happiness, karma - and more importantly, our enlightenment. The other state, ho, is where everything in Life exists whenever it becomes evident to us, such as when a thought pops up from within our memory - whenever we experience or express our emotions - or whenever a good or bad cause manifests as an effect from our karma. When anything becomes apparent, it merely means that it’s come out of the state of Myo (dormancy/latency) and into a state of ho (manifestation). It’s the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, being awake or asleep, or knowing and not knowing. The second law - Renge - Ren meaning cause and ge meaning effect, governs and controls the functions of Myoho - these two laws of Myoho and Renge, not only function together simultaneously but also underlies all spiritual and physical existence. The final and third part of the tri-combination - Kyo, is the Law that allows Myoho to integrate with Renge - or vice versa. It’s the great, invisible thread of energy that fuses and connects all Life and matter - as well as the past, present and future. It’s also sometimes termed the Universal Law of Communication - perhaps it could even be compared with the string theory that many scientists now suspect exists. Just as the cells in our body, our thoughts, feelings and everything else is continually fluctuating within us - all that exists in the world around us and beyond is also in a constant state of flux - constantly controlled by these three fundamental laws. In fact, more things are going back and forth between the two states of Myo and ho in a single moment than it would ever be possible to calculate or describe. And it doesn’t matter how big or small, famous or trivial anything or anyone may appear to be, everything that’s ever existed in the past, exists now or will exist in the future, exists only because of the workings of the Laws ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ - the basis of the four fundamental forces, and if they didn’t function, neither we nor anything else could go on existing. That’s because all forms of existence, including the seasons, day, night, birth, death and so on, are moving forward in an ongoing flow of continuation - rhythmically reverting back and forth between the two fundamental states of Myo and ho in absolute accordance with Renge - and by way of Kyo. Even stars are dying and being reborn under the workings of what the combination ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ represents. Nam, or Namu - which mean the same thing, are vibrational passwords or keys that allow us to reach deep into our life and fuse with or become one with ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’. On a more personal level, nothing ever happens by chance or coincidence, it’s the causes that we’ve made in our past, or are presently making, that determine how these laws function uniquely in each of our lives - as well as the environment from moment to moment. By facing east, in harmony with the direction that the Earth is spinning, and chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for a minimum of, let’s say, ten minutes daily to start with, any of us can experience actual proof of its positive effects in our lives - even if it only makes us feel good on the inside, there will be a definite positive effect. That’s because we’re able to pierce through the thickest layers of our karma and activate our inherent Buddha Nature (our enlightened state). By so doing, we’re then able to bring forth the wisdom and good fortune that we need to challenge, overcome and change our adverse circumstances - turn them into positive ones - or manifest and gain even greater fulfilment in our daily lives from our accumulated good karma. This also allows us to bring forth the wisdom that can free us from the ignorance and stupidity that’s preventing us from accepting and being proud of the person that we indeed are - regardless of our race, colour, gender or sexuality. We’re also able to see and understand our circumstances and the environment far more clearly, as well as attract and connect with any needed external beneficial forces and situations. As I’ve already mentioned, everything is subject to the law of Cause and Effect - the ‘actual-proof-strength’ resulting from chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo always depends on our determination, sincerity and dedication. For example, the levels of difference could be compared to making a sound on a piano, creating a melody, producing a great song, and so on. Something else that’s very important to always respect and acknowledge is that the Law (or if you prefer God) is in everyone and everything. NB: There are frightening and disturbing sounds, and there are tranquil and relaxing sounds. It’s the emotional result of any noise or sound that can trigger off a mood or even instantly change one. When chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day, we are producing a sound vibration that’s the password to our true inner-self - this soon becomes apparent when you start reassessing your views on various things - such as your fears and desires etc. The best way to get the desired result when chanting is not to view things conventionally - rather than reaching out to an external source, we need to reach into our own lives and bring our needs and desires to fruition from within - including the good fortune and strength to achieve any help that we may need. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo also reaches out externally and draws us towards, or draws towards us, what we need to make us happy from our environment. For example, it helps us to be in the right place at the right time - to make better choices and decisions and so forth. We need to think of it as a seed within us that we’re watering and bringing sunshine to for it to grow, blossom and bring forth fruit or flowers. It’s also important to understand that everything we need in life, including the answer to every question and the potential to achieve every dream, already exists within us.

[@dandiesel9966]

I have a slight feeling that technology anywhere in the universe has a plateau meaning it cant push the boundaries we want it to and is limited in its capability. If life was supposed to find each other then either no other world has made it possible because of the constraints or we are just ignored by other life forms, which to be honest, I don't blame them.

[@pixieloco]

spot on!

[@BongGoesPop]

We’re going back to the moon soon so you won’t have long to wait If you look at the secret nasa photos there was a lot of spaceships there with us last time :)

[@BongGoesPop]

@Daniel go check out secureteam10 dude it’s not nice to laugh at others didn’t your mum teach you that

[@philholman8520]

Terrific! 👍✌️🇬🇧

[@defeatSpace]

huehuehuehuehue very deep

[@terrywbreedlove]

The most mysterious question is Gravity. What is Gravity. We can measure it’s effects but we have no idea what it is.

[@deltalima6703]

I have a decent idea of what gravity is, maybe its just you that does not understand it?

[@terrywbreedlove]

@@deltalima6703 Nobody understands what it is. Not you not anybody else.

[@launchphysics]

That is true of pretty much any physical phenomena. A map isn't the same thing as the landscape, its a tool that allows us to navigate. Physics models aren't reality they are tools that allow us to understand what we see as best we are able and make predictions. Einstein's theory of General Relativity gives us a good model of Gravity as Prof Cox explains in the clip. It's not perfect but no scientific model ever is including the Standard Model.

[@norfolknchance.500]

Love to know myself, I know one gas (helium) that can defy gravity, yet another gas cannot (carbon dioxide), is that due to the weight of said gas!? If so then density is in play, which then infers that denser bodies fall through less dense bodies! Sounds like density to me, ....... and applies in all realms! I often wonder why helium balloons do not fall to the ground in the southern hemisphere, as it is still less dense, but it has no concept of "up or down", surely up is up, or so the helium would demonstrate this, yet "gravity" is so mystical that non of that applies! Come on you boffins, please explain without dogma!?

[@launchphysics]

@@norfolknchance.500 Helium does not defy gravity. Gravity is only one force acting on the helium balloon. Whether or not it sinks or not depends on various factors and applies equally in either hemisphere of the earth. No dogma involved, those forces can be measured, you could do it yourself if you have sufficient scientific knowledge and are able to travel to the different hemispheres. Gravity, is not up or down, gravity is towards the centre of mass of the object, in this case the earth.

[@tomalmow3814]

Is material the clock that keeps changing forms or exists in different medium???

[@deemo8578]

whenever i watch anything like this it makes me think, "Who will be proven right in 50 years time"

[@keekwai2]

50 years? lol. Such limited thinking.

[@Bustakonye]

That question itself, and the fact that we as conscience beings have the ability to raise such a question, is the most mysterious phenomena.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can expand and time can vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could vary in actual reality?

[@jamestaylor5231]

Hey folks the greatest discovery is within your Essence to See All The Wonderment and Pureness that is in the SPACE WE sway in.WHEN THEY UPGRADE YOU OR YOU EVOLVE LIKE I HAVE,THEN YOU ARE CHOSEN TO SEE ALL THAT MATTERS.

[@nielsbrusgaard8448]

The biggest mystery is not what is in the Universe , but what is outside the Universe.

[@laieauxdaims]

Is it possible that Dark Energy is just our universe being attracted by the other universes around it ? Assuming our universe is just a drop in a see of other universes.

[@rajeevgangal542]

Yeah I also wonder if that's the case when people talk about a multiverse due to inflation...

[@nmarbletoe8210]

I think Braneworld may be such a scenario... Lisa Randall...

[@classicalphysic]

No. Unfortunately dark energy doesn’t exist.It was invented to save the Big Bang model when it failed to correctly predict recent observations. And it’s worth noting the Big Bang theory has consistently failed in ALL of its predictions. Starting with Georg Gamow in 50s who thought the CMBR was 20K. When in fact it was only 2.7 K. Much closer to Andrew Mckellars prediction in late 1949 that a non expanding universe predicted the CMBR would be about 2.3 K. Odd isnt it? Brian prefers a theory that always fails to predict any future observations. That is he doesn’t like the non expanding universe. Because it’s predictions are far more accurate!

[@LouDeeCruz]

@@rajeevgangal542 Oh no, they only talk about multiverse because they can’t accept that the Big Bang theory always fails to predict observations. Notice the James Webb Space Telescope recently proved that thousands of galaxies too old for the Big Bang theory were being observed. In just one tiny fraction of the sky! Yet Brian and his Big Bang theorists said in last few weeks that it wasn’t the failure of Big Bang theory that their predictions of no mature galaxies would be observed by JWST. They said it was someone else’s fault that The BBT predictions failed! Talk about a bad worker blaming his tools!

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@classicalphysic Did he predict the temperature, or did he measure it?

[@richardsylvanus2717]

I cant smoke enough weed to understand what they mean

[@lastsaiyan3530]

that is why no one will remember your name

[@thomascotton2834]

I like the, Dark Matter could be Anti Matter but it must be something else theory

[@janellehoney-badger6525]

I don’t understand how the massive star that’s absorbing its neighbouring star then explodes in a supernova due to excessive pressure/gravitational force, so couldn’t a supermassive object keep absorbing energy from other nearby objects until the point of another “big bang”? Q - space is infinite in every single direction so when gravitational orbits are explained as a group of planets on a single rubber-like disk around their star, wouldn’t there be an equal plane-disk above as well? It has to “bend space” at both poles as it orbits, right? It’s over my head but geez it’s mind blowing!

[@NickCager]

I remember a funny cartoon of a mathematics professor solving a proof. In the long series of equations, there's a step in the middle called... "(And then a miracle happens)" I have a suspicion this is similar to the dark matter explanation. It's just a crutch to connect the gaps in our (mis)understandings of the universe.

[@arrowrod]

Yahtzee!

[@geigerscalemodeler]

Hmmmmmm....when a star burns it's fuel (energy), how does it "explode" into a Supernova? What is the "trigger"?

[@cps_Zen_Run]

Billy, an equilibrium exists in stars between nuclear fusion and gravity. After exhausting hydrogen and helium, it continues through the periodic table to iron, Fe. That’s the end of the line. LOL. Supernova allows for creation of the heavier elements. Our solar system was the result of a local supernova.

[@geigerscalemodeler]

@@cps_Zen_Run Hmmmmmmm....Alas, I'll never be a cosmologist....hehehe....

[@mbrackeva]

Usually there's a Deathstar involved.

[@geigerscalemodeler]

@@mbrackeva 😂

[@shawns0762]

There is no dark matter. We have all heard the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light" this phenomenon is illustrated in a common relativity graph with velocity (from stationary to the speed of light) on the horizontal line and dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) on the vertical line. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. If these norms are true for galaxies than we can infer that there is 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. There is no way to know this through observation, there is far too much interference, dilation and gravitational lensing. If we attribute a radius to these numbers than we can calculate that relativistic velocities exist in these regions. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein spoke about dilation occuring in regions that would have less mass than that which would exist at the center of our own galaxy. This means that according to Einstein's math that mass is dilated. This means that in some sublime way that mass is all around us because as the graph shows we are still connected to it. The missing mass is dilated mass.

[@benamadhila4974]

What is dilated mass

[@shawns0762]

@@benamadhila4974 It's the phenomenon you see on the right side of a 2 axis relativity graph. It is a squared phenomenon. The rate of dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote "the essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not appear in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive for this reason. A fundamental question is "why can't we see light from the galactic center?". The modern answer is because gravitational forces there are so strong that not even light can escape (even though the mass of the photon is 0). Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is partially or completely dilated relative to an Earth bound observer. Black holes were popularized mostly by television in the 1960's and belief in them gradually came to be despite the fact that Einstein said they cannot exist and there was no evidence.

[@rozzgrey801]

Interesting idea, but it fails because most of the mass in the galaxy is not in the central region. The supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* is 4 million solar masses, but the mass of the whole galaxy is about 200 billion solar masses. It's funny how you superficially seem to know a lot about astronomy, but you somehow missed that big point, or are willfully ignoring it, or pretending, for the purposes of your theory, that it's somehow wrong..

[@rozzgrey801]

@@shawns0762 The rate of dilation doesn't increase exponentially, it increases asymptotically. You claim there is no evidence for black holes, so you are either delusional or simply lying, but you are not being scientific at all, you sound more like a preacher intoning his dogma.

[@shawns0762]

@@rozzgrey801 There is no way to quantify how much mass is at the center of our own galaxy. The interference alone, dilation alone or the gravitational lensing alone would make that virtually impossible. We all learned that mass will dilate when it approaches the speed of light in high school. This is why Einstein said that singularities are not possible in a nutshell. The greatest mystery in science is the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter). It was recently discovered that low mass galaxies (like NGC 1052-DF2) have predictable star rotation rates. This is what relativity would predict because there is an insufficient quantity of mass at the center to achieve relativistic velocities. This is virtual proof that dilation is the governing phenomenon in galactic centers. There can be no other realistic explanation for this fact.

[@nemo6686]

The biggest mystery to me is why KZbin suggests so many Brian Cox videos. It's like a bad dream.

[@RobCLynch]

Everything we comprehend has a limit on it. Our house has walls that surround us. Our towns and cities have a border and so do our countries. Our planet is of limited size. Our galaxy is one of billions of galaxies and each is of a limited size. If this finite size is a universal law, it throws up the problem of our universe being of a limited size and therefore, what is beyond the edge of our universe? If the universe is of an infinite size, it throws up many new problems for us to contemplate.

[@stevewiles7132]

The biggest mystery is " How can anyone call life on this planet intelligent."

[@rjung_ch]

Agree to a huge extent. Is it hubris?

[@kellydalstok8900]

Especially since quite a few still believe that the sun and moon are small(ish) lights that rotate inside a dome above a flat earth.

[@rjung_ch]

@@kellydalstok8900 or the flat earthers, evangelicals who believe that the earth is 6000 years old, those nut jobs are the worst.

[@markware85]

A rather aggressive hairless ape is top of the food chain. Has managed to split the atom, then used the technology to threaten other tribes of its own species. Unlikely to survive long enough to leave this star system.

[@MeetJarred]

@@kellydalstok8900 Flat Earth is Pure Truth! Don't tell me otherwise!!

[@peterdjeric5369]

Answer is 42

[@beatricetourot2146]

I like prof Cox " there must be something else"...To.me it seems there will ALWAYS be *something else* for our consciousness are - still - merely little human beings' though aspiring...Thanking B Cox and the likes who are challenging our restricted power of conscient intelligence.

[@weximan1]

I like Brian Cox,he's nice

[@shadygamererfan377]

What if universe instead of expanding it is decreasing in point with mass.

[@frankfowlkes7872]

When a Type 1-A supernova explodes what happens to the companion star it was drawing matter from?

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

Hello Brian, Following on from my comment yesterday, I have been thinking about this video today, and just watched it again. You say you are looking for a particle 750 times the mass of the proton? Surely this would make it larger than any atom that we know to exist anb be detectable without using a collider. How would it be possible to detect a particle that is 750 times larger than the particles you are colliding, to me it does not make sense. Please could you explain. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

[@wombatcitystudios]

you're going to be waiting 750 years for a reply from Brian

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

@@wombatcitystudios Hello UNM, thank you for your reply. We live in hopes!!!. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

[@faizanrana2998]

Brain does not respond to Noops.

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

@@faizanrana2998 Hello Faizan, I am sorry but I don't understand the point you are making, what are Noops. If you are disagreeing with anything I have said, I would be interested to know what and why. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

[@lisalove6327]

He swear he gonna swindle his way back into my graces ..... He swear I give AF

[@jbbeiser983]

The universe is expanding, and that is the exact opposite what we once thought( and you made us believe it )

[@tokajileo5928]

the biggest mysteries are those whose we do not know the questions of yet.

[@danielschmidt2186]

It's possible that all black holes share the same center. A singularity collapses space and time. The structure of space time is formed after this singular dimension. It's like a sphere with the center being the zero point of the rate that time passes. That zero point is approached by all gravitational lensing but at a singularity the center is the same for all points on the surface of the sphere

[@nmarbletoe8210]

cool. makes me think of Lenny Susskind's talks on entangled black holes connected by a wormhole

[@stefanandersen7726]

Highly doubt it

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@stefanandersen7726 In the ER = EPR conjecture, all entangled black holes would have some sort of Einstein-Rosen Bridge connecting them. The bridges would not be visible from outside, and they would be non-traversable.

[@danielschmidt2186]

@@stefanandersen7726 why?

[@sadiatuba4406]

I think the biggest mystery is why the universe is there(here)?

[@penguinista]

Maybe dark matter is deformations in space time from where there are large concentrations of normal matter, or maybe where matter is for a long time. Like a weakening in the proverbial rubber sheet that causes clumping matter to clump even more.

[@kevinbrooks9074]

I think the biggest mystery for Humanity today is how to decide what bathroom to use at a public Elementary school.

[@davidwalker5054]

There is more than 1 biggest mystery. We have just scratched the surface. There will be things out there we don,t know about. And when we do know about them we won't understand them

[@JewandGreek]

Adam Sandler's career in comedy is the biggest mystery to me.

[@dereklyons1533]

The problem with physics is that the more you know means the more you don't know

[@stewiesaidthat]

You don't know what you don't know until you know what you don't know.

[@keekwai2]

bullshit

[@LWJCarroll]

Accelerating expansion of our universe sounds like gravity in reverse….like a yin/yang relationship? Thanks Laurie NZ.

[@mikemiller5254]

The real problem is why didn't my tomatoes turn red this summer? And doesn't dark energy and dark matter sound something like phlogeston and ether?

[@sattyre6892]

What occurs to me when scientists discuss matter and the 95% of unknown material in the universe, is that matter as we know it, travels at less then the speed of light. Could we perceive particles that only travel faster then light? And is there a light type barrier on the slow side of particle movement? And if so, could we perceive it? It seems to me, that if there is a barrier of some type, then there must be something on the other side of that barrier or barriers. Just because we can't measure it or see it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Which brings us back to what makes up the other 95% of the universe. Clearly, it is made up of things we can't see or measure or perceive at this point.

[@NeilBouwman]

The Universe is like our brain. We don't fully understand it and there's a myth we only use 10% of it. There's only 5% of ordinary matter in the Universe which we can account for. The rest we don't understand yet.

[@andrehughes1]

If there is 5 times more dark matter than regular matter, and it behaves gravitationally the same as regular matter, why doesn't it attract and condense into round objects like matter does? It seems to always remain diffuse, so it cannot behave the same gravitationally.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

If it interacts weakly with itself, it might not be able to stick together to form solid objects.

[@clientesinformacoes6364]

That is a good point.

[@clientesinformacoes6364]

I believe dark matter is another type of space time, a different structure. Space time is an elastic structure, and that is what I think gravity is coming from. If we think that space time in a quantum scale works like tiny magnets as "particles", we can say space time is solid and elastic, this elasticity is what gives gravity by squeezing particles. Diferente structure, means different density and will interact with gravity anyways, the same way there are different materials with different masses and they attract to each other. Maybe it diffuses because is less dense then space time itself. If space time have "tiny magnets", those magnetis can be splitted into two and still have same properties in large scale, but diferente densities.

[@proteslapower6754]

This time what went on in Vegas will not stay in Vegas!! I met both Britney Spears and Elon Musk in 2000 at Bellagio. Britney just stared at me as she was singing on stage and I was standing in an archway above and nearby. I'm not sure if I was supposed to be standing up there by myself but I did have her undivided attention. A few days later Elon came up to me and started asking me questions about what I was doing there, in Las Vegas and Hawaii during that time. If I would I be fine answering a few questions. And if I was a gambling man? I stated, "I was on vacation and I only like to bet on things that are worth betting on!" I had earned these trips by qualifying reward points at my work. He asked, "What kind of work is it that you do?" I said, "Commercial energy saving promotions but I had been schooled in Automotive Marketing Business Administration and worked in that field for several years as well." He asked me, "If I had millions of dollars to spend what would be the most innovative businesses that could help humanity?" We talked about electric cars, we talked about solar energy and so many other subjects for over an hour. Even commercial space exploration for the consideration of colonization. That way all of humanity's eggs are not in one basket in case of another world war, asteroid strike, major climate change, etc. These we're very expensive and ambitious businesses to become successful at. Therefore we had to talk about ways of keeping a low overhead in advertising, distribution and the manufacturing. He said, "They were all very good ideas and that they should be done!" He said he had already made hundreds of millions off of a couple internet companies he started. "One of them was PayPal," he stated. Not that I had really done a lot of online banking or e-transfers at that time I didn't think much of it, until I noticed online about a year later that I could buy something off the computer with my PayPal card! Unfortunately I had just received a promotion as regional manager with the company I was working with. This made me let Elon know that I had to wait for a few years before I could assist further. I keep on sending out messages, hoping that he will get one and reply back. I will probably have to keep on trying, he gets more messages in a day then I would in five years! It is very inspiring to me to have a conversation with someone and they dedicate the next 20 years to making our conversation reality! We also talked about becoming your own best supplier and starting businesses that help your existing business. A type of slingshot effect that he has incorporated very well. It is so ambitious and amazing that he was willing to put pretty much all of his money where his mouth is and just make it happen with a consistent dedication. Congratulations Elon and I am looking forward to working with you again, one day in the near future! I still come up with innovative business ideas on a daily basis. Of course Britney I always wish her well and would enjoy meeting her again as well. Let's shoot for the Moon then Mars and then we will end up amongst the Stars! If you would like to learn more of these topics let me know. People with integrity expect to be believed otherwise they let time prove them right! [e-mail]

[@himynameis3664]

I think there is a very real chance that there is no possible way a faster than light speed engine can be created. Even if there is a civilization out there a hundred thousand years beyond us technologically, there just might not exist a way to travel those speeds. And really for true galactic exploration and colonization we need these speeds...I mean even at that impossible speed it still would take years to reach our nearest star system..Space is so unimaginably huge. Some paper was researched a while back that basically said you could pick a random direction and travel in a straight line to the "edge" of the universe without running into any form of matter (not including atomic particles) that you could do this a multitude of times with the same result. We're so used to marvelling at the amount of suns and planets and galaxies, but I'm always blown away by the size of the emptiness between these things. One of my favourite facts is that you could fit every single planet in the solar system between Earth and the moon.( when the moon is at its furthest point away from us in its orbit, it's "apogee")

[@bg1616]

You are probably right but there might be a way to cheat the distance though

[@himynameis3664]

@@bg1616 yeah hopefully. There are some designs working on the theory of expanding and contracting space itself so that the ship would travel relativistic speeds without breaking physics. We'd still need to create adequate shielding but anything is possible

[@bg1616]

@@himynameis3664 Yeah I saw mention of that. Maybe one for our great great great great grandkids assuming life survives the 21st century

[@himynameis3664]

@@bg1616 It's definetly a long ways off alright. My original comment was pretty pessimistic but if we survive long enough like you said I think we will figure it out. I mean we went from zero aircraft with scientists in the 1890's - 1900 saying manned flight is impossible, to landing on the moon 60 years later. That is some rapid development. With the right scientific breakthrough we could achieve FTL travel quite quickly

[@bg1616]

@@himynameis3664 True story! Mankind is quite something, lucky we have a sub-population of super brains to work on this stuff.

[@doublebass1985]

I just realized this and I believe that the reason outer space is in a vacuum is because of blackholes. That actually makes sense doesn't it? They suck the volume of space therefore creating a negative pressure out in interstellar space.

[@iDeondrae]

The sound explosions in a vacuum ?

[@abrahammulder]

We are the biggest mysterie!!!

[@christinearmington]

So exciting and intriguing. Yet, all our rushing and discovering serves to degrade and heat the ecosystem we’d like to understand.

[@chrismagee333]

The biggest mystery is why there's something instead of nothing. This video is about some of the possible mechanics of some aspects of some questions.

[@MuscleBandit]

I think there is a chance that we are in a simulation whereby our creators are observing us progress slowly toward breaking out of their experiment and into their realm which will remain abstract to us until then. It could be a technological creator such as AI like The Matrix or it could be a spiritual / supernatural entity but either way is it really good enough to be defeatist and take the black pill nihilistic route when the chances are just as good that we have purpose that requires work to become tangible....

[@bigimskiweisenheimer8325]

If we are, rest assured so are they, and so we will be (and almost are)

[@MuscleBandit]

@@bigimskiweisenheimer8325 Interesting! So, in terms of purpose and meaning where could you see that going? An endless feedback loop must just be a glitch surely...

[@lenandov]

chicken goat basket

[@Norpan506]

Do you think our creators knew anything about tacos before programming this simulation?

[@MuscleBandit]

@@Norpan506 They were missing out if they didn't.

[@davidissel7980]

There are LOTS of science questions that can never be answered, for example: 1. Is the universe truly infinite? 2. What happens beyond the event horizon of a black hole? 3. Since you can't make "something" from "nothing"... where did all the matter in our universe come from? Once you answer #3... well, where did THAT stuff come from? /repeat forever

[@ooglyga6100]

Definitely not a god.

[@norfolknchance.500]

Dogma!

[@lionroar26]

@@ooglyga6100 Why not? The real question is why all human beings have the intelligence to come to the conclusion that something intelligent that has design has to be created, but when it comes to our existence you openly deny this fact. Look at the eco system of our own planet, it has design, look into your own selves, it has design, if we can look at a smartphone and come to the conclusion that it was created why can't we do the same for the universe? The real question you should be asking is if their is a Creator what is the true purpose for our existence.

[@kellydalstok8900]

@@lionroar26 The idea for a god creating things is thousands of years old. At that time people didn’t know anything, but were afraid to say “I don’t know”, so they made up explanations, just like a four year old would do. For every scientific discovery that was made since, the answer was NEVER “god dunnit”, so I’m confident that isn’t ever going to be the answer in the future either. There is nothing wrong with saying you don’t know when you don’t have an answer (yet).

[@lionroar26]

@@kellydalstok8900 You don't know the iPhone was created without visiting the factory it was produced in? Without meeting its inventor? Majority of human beings have the ability to come to the conclusion that it is designed and created without going to the factory and meeting its creator. The life on earth is so complex and the things we need to survive on is so majestic it is saying the same thing but you athiests will never admit it. The real question is what is the purpose for our existence, right?

[@stevecashman_]

“We think” and “exactly opposite of what we thought” among other overlooked utterances. They don’t know folks. Like many other “sciences” the expectation is you’re supposed to forget the previous absolute when they’ve “learned” something new.

[@CastleKnight7]

Thought is, as everything else stems from that.

[@andrewramage5850]

Could dark energy be caused by the meeting of anti-matter and matter ?

[@terraneko8999]

nope

[@fins59]

Nah

[@NicleT]

Is this a 2013 source of Brian Cox revamped in a 2022 editing envelope?

[@edwardjoliniii3948]

I know the answers that everyone is looking for in this subject. I have spent my life pushing myself on how to express the truth about the reality of this world and beyond. When watching scientists lost in most of these subjects, I always have the answers using what I call common sense. Unfortunately that is not the case because most people can't even grasp the answers right in front of them. I'm working on my book to hopefully push humanity in the right direction. I just hope that I don't have the same results as Tesla and Einstein.

[@michellet268]

Solar systems are atoms?

[@Razmatazuk]

Interested in your book. I too think that the answers sometimes come in the simplist forms, and can be condensed down using logic. Some scientists are too deeply into their research and go down rabbit holes looking for an answer, and end up creating whole fictions of realities that lead them to dead ends. Whilst it's interesting and perhaps essential to postulate all possibilities, sometimes too much time is wasted chasing false ideas. I like Einsteins approach to postulating, because it leads to fundamental truths.

[@damianminchin]

So is the universe is expanding does this mean dark energy increases ?

[@realitykicksin8755]

Its size is a mystery.

[@philharmer198]

At 10:00 minutes into the video , the Universe is expanding . But 32% of the Universe is blue shifted , meaning those galaxies are moving towards us . So it seems the Whole of the Universe is not expanding .

[@childfreesingleandatheist8899]

I think it’s been said in different videos that the space of the universe is expanding such as the space between galaxies. Nothing to do with where galaxies are moving.

[@PeterParker-gt3xl]

Someday we'll be able to prove (or disprove) that something can come out of absolute nothingness, recycle of "anything" (pre-existed atoms, elements, etc. on earth or in the outer space) is very plausible and rational.