"Is Tunneling the Best Killer Strategy?" - Dead by Daylight

[@wheystedmusic]

Can we talk about how the devs literally made Demo a tunneling killer

[@goagulant9503]

How so?

[@ScottJund]

@@goagulant9503he goes in tunnels

[@wheystedmusic]

@@goagulant9503 his power is to make a tunnel and teleport through them 😂 (bum dum tis)

[@goagulant9503]

@@ScottJund ohhhhhh haha thats clever lol that went right over my head

[@MightyJabroni]

Xenomorph is an even greater tunneler, though.

[@MrJeff-jd1jv]

This bubble you speak of sounds almost like some sort of radius that causes survivors to feel some form of terror when inside of it

[@skopsi7539]

Like a spooky circle, or maybe a scary zone? Idk I feel like there should be a term for it.

[@lapizcata6930]

Fear area?

[@Muciatneh]

The fun zone

[@TrueMiz]

Terror.... Territory...

[@liptonpipton4135]

terror radius!!... ah

[@Ben_of_Milam_Music]

Tunneling is a hyper-aggressive strategy based on pure offensive play. The opposite strategy would be three genning, a slow, methodical pure defensive strategy. In a lot of games, pure aggression tends to decimate casual players (Zerg rushing in RTS games, burn aggro in MTG, king's gambit in chess, spamming in fighting games, ect). Against experienced players that are familiar with the strategy and are prepared to play against it, hyper aggression tends to cause the aggressive player to just burn out all their gas super early and then get wiped. It's not too different in DbD at all, the tunneler is playing super aggressive and hedging all of their bets on blitzing one player out. However, the strategy fails super hard if the team is prepared to deal with it by bringing altruistic perks and having good gen efficiency. It's a high risk, high reward strategy that is disproportionately rewarding due to how casual the playerbase is and the lack of a ranked ladder.

[@rootobia]

I've never seen someone put it this way, I think that's actually the perfect way to describe it.

[@Ben_of_Milam_Music]

@@rootobia I've read a lot of game design books lol, got plenty of useless knowledge on how to dissect and discuss games

[@ttwosoap6679]

i hope to one day be able to articulate my thoughts like this

[@Ben_of_Milam_Music]

@@ttwosoap6679 writing a lot helps. as you write, you can spot issues or flaws in your line of thinking and correct them. later when the subject comes up, all your thinking is already completed so you basically just reiterate your logic and conclusion instead of being forced to think of everything on the spot. it's all about preparation and conscious improvement, essentially

[@samuellinn]

This actually makes so much sense

[@bubblewrap8823]

my big thing about tunneling is that when im hangin out with friends, tunneling just results in the most casual / less experienced players dying really quickly and just being bored or frustrated (or even just sad) waiting for us to move on -just for it to happen again. i never mind losing or getting 4k’d, even for hours at a time (it sucks but w/e as long as we get to play and have fun), it just creates really unpleasant situations and only *really* hurts casual players

[@banan6216]

This exactly. It's just not fun to go up against, even if we disregard the player getting tunneled, the rest of the team are basically stuck on gens for the whole game, which isn't fun. And they might be able to get chased, but most of the time that is only after the game is unwinnable.

[@atomic3968]

Hide

[@michealprice8372]

"I'm God's greatest soldier" -Scott Jund

[@PistolSlinginMothMan]

Scott Jund needs me to lead the revolution, I’m J-man’s top guy

[@keltonschleyer6367]

Can confirm, he definitely said those words in that order.

[@Upsetkiller456]

His name isn't Rick.

[@KatyaAbc575]

Rock, Soldier of God.

[@aMissingPerson_]

Where are these just "ok" survivors running the killer for 3-4 minutes, cause I don't see them in soloq.

[@bmo7259]

*when they have the whole map open* when there isn't a gen they don't want to interupt, when there has been 0 pallets used an alright player can just predrop everything and last a long time, sure the a map will be empty but just predropping with distance can buy your 3-4 minutes. But most people don't just throw down everything as soon as they reach it, since most games go on longer than 4 minutes after that 1 chase everyone else is screwed

[@aMissingPerson_]

@@bmo7259 predropping doesn't work in soloq because gens aren't done efficiently.

[@edward222100]

theres a huge skill difference gap in survivors because of how casual the community is. A lot of players just play to lose and theyre fine with that. If you want to actually progress in dbd you need friends

[@yomama2376]

I think im “ok” and probably most i have lasted recently is 90-100 seconds in chase (i know because my off the record ran out). i have like 400-ish hrs.

[@edward222100]

@@yomama2376 youre above average

[@satirical_snake]

I've heard people call the "tunneling two people" strat "Ping-Ponging"

[@swatson5699]

Killers don’t realize how much time they waste dealing with Off The Record and DS. Ping Ponging in public matches is insanely strong.

[@Steezus315]

scoot judn,

[@Irondragon1945]

Judge Jundy is my favourite nickname so far

[@PistolSlinginMothMan]

Scrotum Jaundice

[@Jefrejtor]

He scootim

[@missbelled6700]

@@Jefrejtor I'M SCOOTIN

[@artimus4198]

@@PistolSlinginMothManlmao jaundice is a wild nickname 😂

[@boltogen5416]

I’ve never played this game to be “optimal” and honestly quit it when that’s all I saw people doing. I played killer with some respect to survivors because, they’re also players. They’re people who likely also just got off work and wanna have some fun before going to bed. Yeah I lose a ton of matches because of this, but I often feel worse if I win by being a jackass. If I only find the same person who just got unhooked, I either walk away or down them if they get in my way purposely. I always try to go after more than one player the match, and do try and take it easy on one who I notice is sufficiently less skilled than me in the game. And yeah I know the running joke, “Nobody plays DBD to have fun”. But it’s simply not true, and to me I can’t have fun if I don’t respect my opponent. Cause I’m always seeing that it’s another person playing behind that character, and they probably don’t want to be getting tunneled or camped, much like how I wouldn’t want to be.

[@krypto8881]

its kinda a shame but yea people want to play as optimal as possible which tbf its kinda human nature to do things as efficient as possible its causes ppl to lose sight of why theyre playing the game in the first place which is to have fun and unwind from a long day at work or just a stressful day in general

[@sherif7491]

This mindset will get u to lose and get tea bagged at the exit gate

[@kitanat9944]

That’s a great mindset and I think similarly

[@MrVIrginiaLUV]

People who just got off work, blowing off steam, shouldnt care about losing in DBD. It's weird for someone who is playing casually, to expect wins against folks who are actually playing to win. If I get on as Killer to casually play and get blood points for a specific character, I'm not concerned with winning. I'm chillin. Casual players shouldn't expect wins if they play casual.

[@MrVIrginiaLUV]

​@@krypto8881On the other hand, some folks have fun when they actually win. Ever heard of organized sports. You think all of those folks are there JUST for fun? 😂😂😂

[@Coulroperation]

There are so many killers that will just ignore you doing gens within 16~ meters of them to tunnel someone, then complain about genrushing in post game chat, it is actual insanity behavior. Like if they just took 2 seconds to pressure you off that gen, you might miss a skill check, you might call out that the killer has gone on you, making the guy who was being tunneled stop and heal in an unsafe area where they can be interrupted, etc., basically what you were trying to say with the killer having a "bubble" of influence.

[@6ToesHeACreature]

This is why I love Artist so much, I can pressure survivors while still tunneling the weak link hell in some cases I can proc the bt far away and come in for the m1.

[@sherif7491]

The strategy u mentioned ain't as effective as tunneling since someone can just fix the gen again after the killer leave and the anti 3 gen thing that for some reason work all match blocking the gen from u

[@gamerboy218]

Alright, but let's look at this same scenario from the other POV. The killer leaves the person they're tunneling to chase you. You leave the gen and call out the killer is now on you. So what? Your friend hops back on the gen you were just chased off. Now not only is the gen being done at the same rate, but the killer is losing the pressure of getting someone out. And who's to say the person being tunneled doesn't just hop onto the gen themself soon as they drop chase? Since they know they're now safe. Or maybe they're running Resil so they can actually get the gen done faster Tunneling sucks for everyone and feels bad for both sides. As a killer main, sure I've had to tunnel sometimes and hate very minute of it. But it is a viable strategy, getting one person out the absolute fastest does tip the match in your favor. And sometimes is the only thing a killer can do if they want to perform well, outside of completely throwing the game. Otz has said this and many other DBD youtubers have said this, and there's never going to really be a good way to address it. But there is a difference between choosing the best available strategy to play well in your current situation, and then being completely toxic and tunneling right at the start of the game. Killers need to be incentivized to roam and engage with chase but sometimes it feels like you're being punished for doing exactly that. A lot of killer tunneling is from necessity not exactly malice IE: 4 man survivor squad plays survivor strong map offering against a low tier meme build killer. Unless you throw you may have to play dirty. That's not malice to spite a 4 stack, that's adapting to a team well above your power level in that situation. Granted, this doesn't cover the killers that do engage in this to be toxic but the majority do just wanna run around and have fun like the survivors. The toxic base is always going to be the louder but smaller majority of players

[@evan5102]

​@@gamerboy218this every single bit of this is facts tunneling sucks but it's a viable strat sadly I've gotten tunneled out of the game many times but I don't get upset yea it sucks that I barely got to play the game but from the killers pov you gotta get rid of the weakest link to add pressure

[@mckookie2967]

​same with Unknown lol, especially with vanishing box

[@CakeDayZ]

I hate when my bad teammates insta-unhook me, and the killer decides to punish me by tunneling.

[@muysli.y1855]

Or Distortion runner

[@LuckyKat89TV]

Nah. I then hard tunnel THEM bc they gotta pay. Like hello if you just give me a fucking chance, I damn near jog away from the hook. The one thing that will turn me toxic fast as fuck as killer. Are people screwing their teammates.

[@WutTheDeuceGaming]

bit of advice, not saying you do it or not, but DO NOT bodyblock off of hook. This will all but guarantee killers will go after you because you're preventing them from chasing the unhooker.

[@Sprachitektur]

@@WutTheDeuceGaming often the speedboost from hit might make it harder than he just walking behind you and waiting for endurance to run out

[@TheGoldenBoo]

Nah, you see, I'm punishing *them* by tunneling you. That's just evil 101, kid; you wanna hurt somebody, indirect targeting is more effective than direct targeting. Hurt the people they love. That's where their real tender spots are. I'm half-joking. Sometimes I feel like survivors don't understand how bad their unhook timing is, and maybe they'll feel worse knowing they farmed their friend than sacrificing themselves. There are also times where I'll purposefully not tunnel because I feel bad for the survivor. Very rarely, there are even matches where I let survivors go because I feel bad for them. Really just kinda depends on the mood I'm in. Same goes for whether I give hatch or not.

[@Chaosrain112]

Spreading pressure seems like such a fundamental simple concept in a 1v4 game. I suck at this game and rarely play it, but even while stoned I'll still have the thought "oh, I should check on other shit and stab other people".

[@jphelps884]

Tunneling is really killer dependent. Someone like a Nurse, Spirit, Blight can tunnel all they want and face little repercussion because their time to down is so quick. Yet someone like Myers, Ghostface, or Legion have no tools to down quickly and have more drawbacks to tunneling.

[@JH-dr4xo]

Myers and Ghostface do have tools to down quickly though

[@derrian6969]

​@@JH-dr4xo In a dead zones, every killers have tools to down people. OP is speaking about deadzones.

[@JakeobE]

@@derrian6969 Stealth killers with one shots definitely can down anywhere, not just deadzones. OP is actually saying their powers don't mean anything to tunneling, where the survivor is already injured and likely aware of them coming back.

[@connork9745]

@@JH-dr4xo Myers and Ghostface have nothing on Blight or Nurse Blight can catch survivors and force resource wastage like pallets in the same time it takes Ghostface or Myers force a pallet optionally get stunned and lead to the next loop When you play Blight or Nurse your not fighting the survivors your fighting yourself

[@GG-kn2se]

“No tools to down quickly” brother they are 1 hit off hook

[@siennas254]

I really try not to intentionally tunnel but bad players that are easy to down also tend to make bad decisions and be easy to down consecutively. If someone with zero deadhard gets unhooked then just works on a gen in front of me like...obviously they're just gonna die and gens will be 25% slower from then on

[@flyingdutchman8399]

while this is true it only leads towards mediocre skill on your part, true it is fun to win matches and the most effective thing on a public match is to tunnel out the noob with 50 hrs in the game and easily win by that point, you are not only getting a false reality of "im good at this game" , you are also idiotizing your brain more and more expecting dumb strategies to work because you are executing them on dumb players, so when you actually face the one team thats doesnt have 4 monkeys the completely stomp you and you start ranting about game balance and blabla.. because you are not used , take a look for example tru3ta1ent he is so decieved by his own mind that he is good that when he loses he refuses to acknowledge that they played better than him, he will always find and excuse or something to blame above his lack of skill and macro. Its sad

[@siennas254]

@@flyingdutchman8399Yeah but I'm not trying to be the best dbd player ever so who cares, first find is first find at that point

[@paradiseyt4275]

@@flyingdutchman8399 they're talking about situations like if someone who just got unhooked for some reason decides to bodyblock for the unhooker (i know it sounds insane but it happens) where they're putting themselves in harms way for no real purpose. not even otzdarva would ignore a survivor just standing in front of him, we're at least gonna give em a little whack to let them know they're not supposed to do that

[@usedhalfcart]

@@flyingdutchman8399but its their fault for fucking up in the first place. its always the smartest to punish a survivors mistake as it can lead to snowballs. giving them chances is totally up to you but i rarely do it unless a survivor killed themselves early.

[@matthenley3886]

@@siennas254If someone gets unhooked and you happen to find them on a gen after I don’t really think that’s tunneling. A tunnelling killer won’t be checking gens to find you, they’ll be coming for you straight after unhooking.

[@coletrainhetrick]

I honestly feel like people saying no are just trying to trick killers into not doing it when it genuinely is the best thing you can do

[@atrozzorta9602]

OMG someone else that noticed this!!!! Thank you so much for existing and commenting this, was starting to feel alone. Copy paste from another comment: "I'd say it's more likely that survivor mains said no because that would invalidate all the whining they have done for years, and would incentivize and encourage more killers to tunnel if they admitted tunneling was the best strategy for killers. PLUS a lot of survivor mains have never touched killer and the couple times they have they have been against babies which anyone with the ability to move their killer and attack will automatically win."

[@dodang_9147]

Agree, Tunneling is strongest strategy in the game for killer by far. full stop.

[@arsoul3591]

Tell us you're garbage at killer without telling us you're garbage at killer lol, I had like 1500 hours in Billy alone before he was buffed and was able to win at least 80% of my games without tunneling, even actively avoiding it. Get better.

[@atrozzorta9602]

@@arsoul3591 Tell us you're garbage at killer without telling us you're garbage at killer lol, I had like 127389719283700 hours in Billy alone before he was buffed and was able to win at least 120% of my games without tunneling, even actively avoiding it. Get better.

[@arsoul3591]

@@atrozzorta9602 good bot

[@reimsvargas2470]

The thing about tunneling is that idk why I often get paired with semi good players and what will happen is that the killer will tunnel them out of the game because they are not that good at looping which then leads to an un winnable match because even if we stick the gens it just isn’t enough time. It’s just not fun playing a game that you know for a fact you won’t be able to win.

[@1q2w3e4r5t6yx]

Survivor: "Thank you for not tunneling me" Billy killer: "You're welcome". Survivor: "What was your build btw?" Billy killer: "Perkless with cracked bulb primer & Lery's offering" Survivor: "You beautiful bastard!"

[@sorin_markov]

TL;DW: It depends, but it usually isn't in regular matches and it's unfun either way

[@LuvShiramine]

being tunneled is fun?? its your opportunity to single handily carry the whole match

[@syn4621]

​@@LuvShiramine i know right. people say holding m1 on gens is boring and then complain when they get tunneled. it's so weird

[@sorin_markov]

@@LuvShiramine Idk man, most people don't like dying 3 minutes into the match and never getting to do the objective

[@zello4075]

@@sorin_markova good player can capitalize on being tunneled and make time for the rest of the time

[@GG-kn2se]

Regular matches is killers aggressively tunnelling one person then acting all friendly afterwards because the win is guaranteed at that point

[@JKash7411]

I also find it funny when a killer brings Pain Res, Grim Embrace, etc. but then proceeds to tunnel 1 person out of the game immediately. Like, they're working against their perks and diminishing the value they get from them lol. Great talking points, Scott!

[@inmate92]

Yeah because some people in this game just tunnel - no matter what perks they bring. It often seems like they've googled "strongest killer perks dbd" and just went by it.

[@zello4075]

if you tunnel with these perks and it goes well, lets say with 2 gens then you get huge value with strong pressure with the remaining 3 survivors having their stacks intact

[@JKash7411]

@@zello4075 totally fair! I've definitely seen it go both ways (1k only from wasted perks or a 4k from huge value). I think it just goes back to Scott's point about not going in with that being your automatic strategy and to be more thoughtful/adjust based on what's going on in the game

[@WutTheDeuceGaming]

this scenario isn't entirely true if the killer continuously hooks the tunneled player on a Pain Res hook. This is one of those perks that works extremely well with a tunneling playstyle.

[@garasb660]

@@WutTheDeuceGamingYou do know pain res only works once per person right? So hooking the same guy on it does not work well. But if you get them out efficiently, you'll still have 3 more stacks of it if you put the other 3 on one

[@chacehorsman2615]

TL;DR - Unless you're playing for money, beating people who are better than you because you tunnel one person out does nothing more than make your future games more difficult and proportionally less fun. I think tunnelling is the most "efficient" strategy in terms of optimally setup comp gameplay. But casually-speaking, its wildly varying. Now, in this you have to ask what is the definition of "best"? Like, best for winning the game or best for having enjoyable, dynamic gameplay where players feel like they have agency? I'm glad scott mentions at 8:00 that the reason why tunneling is so prolific in comp is because of restrictions in what's allowed in order to balance the game. When you're talking random dbd lobbies where you just: click ready and hope the people you're against are bringing fun and interesting builds, bp offerings, playing solo, doing archives.... and NOT repeated 4 second chance perks, a clock-based comms, and a map offering.... its INCREDIBLY imbalanced. I stopped taking dbd seriously a long time ago and I recognized that I liked chases more than kicking gens and camping. And tryharding meant literally nothing more than my future games being harder against better players. So I started maining Clown and running fun builds to the point where I play for hooks and average 2.8 kills, 7.5 hooks, and generally enjoy most of my games. That being said, the gentleman's agreement turns off for things like map offerings, clear and obvious bm, or saboing my first hook lol. But in that case I just turn the tryhard mode on and play like that for a game because its justified that the other players are playing to win. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but I just move on and don't emotionally bring it into the next game because you have absolutely no idea about the mindset, builds, items, offerings, or skill level of your opponents.

[@reimsvargas2470]

I get tunneled very often and it’s one of the main reasons I run this build: DS, DH, MFT and resilience. After looping the killer for 5 gens because I was getting tunneled they always have the audacity to say that my build is the only reason I looped them all game as if it wasn’t them giving my build value and getting punished for trying to tunnel. Killers now days are way too dependent on tunneling and camping it’s basically what 90% of my matches look like. And then they get mad when they get punished for tunneling and camping as if that was the way the devs intended the game to be played like.

[@VileVamp]

It kinda depends. Just hooked a surv, looked around for a bit, and realized none of them went for a save? Going back to confirm a hook state isn't a bad option, they have to take some hits or a down, or one of their guys is dying.

[@jonathanbelcourt1208]

I kind of disagree. If no one is going for save within 15-20 seconds, gens are flying. By looking around do you mean proxying the hook? If so, its just counterproductive to wait for unhook. People will be on gens regardless. It'd be more worthwhile to apply pressure elsewhere. The scenario I see this working is mid game, and there are multiple injured survivors. They would be forced to use time to heal, THEN have to go for unhook. By then its almost guaranteed you will get a trade from it

[@flyingdutchman8399]

thats why camping is so effective on public matches, if you take a look around and dont see anybody at comp or not even comp... just vs decent players and you turn back to confirm the 2nd stage not only you are getting 2+ gens done, the guy is going to sit on that hook for other 60s and they are going to trade at the last second of his hook time so they finish all gens and leave.... while in public matches same scenario you take a look around see no one because they are doing archives, hiding, afk, being stupid, being noobs etc.. and then suddenly some random meg will appear in your face and trade you a hook while no one was doing anything.. so yeah, it works only vs monkeys you see

[@zxzolfo]

Per se this is not tunneling, it is tunneling only when the guy IS saved and you ignore everyone to chase him again.

[@Dekmakinson9]

@@jonathanbelcourt1208it’s far too much of a generalization, whether or not this is the correct play depends on killer perks and add ons, which all drastically change decisions, imo if you have better mobility then you can go back to ensure a 2nd hook state/kill the unhooker. However It’s most likely that you just finish finding a new survivor since youve gathered info and likely can find one in less time than walking back to the hook.

[@jonathanbelcourt1208]

@@Dekmakinson9 If you are playing a high mobility killer, there is no reason to stay near hook or go back to hook unless: you see someone close, you cant find anyone else to chase, or they insta save. If there is a high progress gen close, then I understand that. Otherwise its kind of a waste of time

[@derrickhegeman3205]

I love running Reassurance and OTR. They’re amazing perks that only punish the killer if the camp or tunnel. If they go off and chase someone else, they get no value and everyone gets a chance to play a full match

[@Gavalicious81]

I think it depends on what kinda tunneling is being done, personally I only tunnel in certain situations. For example, if I try to go after the person that is unhooking and the unhooked surv is trying to take a hit, I'm gonna go for you cause you're throwing yourself at me. Another example, if it's endgame and I've got 1 surv hooked, I'm obviously gonna tunnel the unhooked surv cause I want the kill. The only tunneling I actually disagree with is tunneling from the start of the game or tunneling someone straight off hook, I find those the most aggravating/annoying forms of tunneling personally.

[@middox239]

i have found out that with the amount of people running distortion i am sometimes forced to tunnel because i just straight up cant fucking find anyone else but the one guy without distortion and then they just die at 3-4 gens

[@LieutenantSkittles]

Your bubble explanation is why I love the Unknown so much. With his teleport, he can be everywhere. He can drop a chase to interrupt gen progress somewhere else within a matter of seconds.

[@Saronite]

Am willing to bet that most people who voted no meant "It is the optimal strategy for killers that can end chases quickly such as nurse blight and whisker, but not optimal for late game killers such as oni nemesis and onryo"

[@tmidge]

tunneling is like the room of requirement in harry potter. " If you have to ask, you'll never know. If you know, you only need to ask."

[@chasehudson26]

I wish the game rewarded killers for the number of unique hooks instead of out right kills. Maybe make it so you get passive slowdown as you hook more and more unique survivors. You get heavily punished as killer if you hook 3-4 survivors twice rather than focusing on killing 1-2 survivors.

[@yeetmcskeet9533]

I always liked the idea that survivors should get a very small debuff after 1 and more after 2 hooks bc it makes sense that someone whose been thrown on a meat hook is gonna be mangled and physically weaker even if they magically heal.

[@sagexalcen4708]

That was a huge discussion some years ago. You can kind of blame the playerbase, both killer AND survivor, for it being kills over hooks. This is one of the few times I can't blame BHVR. They in this case just listened to their playerbase.

[@cs1645]

@@yeetmcskeet9533 just want tunelling to be even easier lmao

[@thedoomslayer5863]

​@@cs1645 spoken like a true nemesis main

[@yeetmcskeet9533]

@@cs1645 I know you're butthurt bc you got tunneled today.

[@arcarc2663]

People aren't going to answer that question honestly. Of course people are going to say that SOMETIMES tunneling isn't always optimal. It's like asking if you should eat fast food. Obviously people are going to say no, and yet, a hojillion people do it anyway, because it's the cheapest, most brainless, and easiest thing to do. A free, easy way to win with no good counterplay is served right up, invalidates the whole suite of altruism perks for both people, as well as all non-chase info perks, with tons of killer perks now that slow down the game passively, encourage hanging around the hook, and most work even better once someone's out. I'm of the opinion that tunneling is a symptom, and the real problem is camping, even proxy camping. If a killer isn't camping, the opportunity to tunnel and the cost and risk to do so (for non-mobility killers) is much more severe. Actually address camping in some way, and the opportunity to tunnel goes way down. This is also why old DS was such a good deterrent. It didn't actually really stop tunneling, but it felt AWFUL to be hit with, so people naturally tried to avoid that feeling, and I can't wait for it to come back, even though I think it's going to take a while because Reddit/Twitter/Forum killers are stubborn bastards and will keep trying to do the same shit, but now out of spite.

[@kutoro4497]

If I’m playing bubba and the survivor unhooks the immediate second I hook the person, I’m not tunneling, they just simply are brain dead and now I’m insidious camping them in basement until they can no longer have a will to live.

[@zachxy3108]

Survivor's optimal play is to split 3 gens at the same time, assuming Killer is occupied chasing the 4th Survivor. That's 90 seconds to pop 3 gens. Another 90 seconds for 4th 5th & 6th gens. Killer no way can defend 2 gens with high progress when 4/5 gen done til exit powered. The sooner a survivor is out of the game, survivor gen efficiency is down drastically. Tunnelling the weakeast link is the best strat. Survivors dont need to be decent in chase to hold m1.

[@ryanlutes9833]

"best" is sort of a dodgy question. Most fun? strongest? Tunneling can be detrimental when done at bad times. If you know when to focus on a single survivor, it can make your matches much more consistent overall. It's just one tool in a killer's toolbox.

[@xenwinsanityexe9811]

~ tunneling is not subject of hatred or toxicity, is just a strategy in a videogame ~ we talking about tunneling, so is a great strategy if generators are 2 left or 3 you killing 1 survivor quick to comeback, and also you can get rid of decisive strike on survivors is not quite tunneling ( but it is value this way ) after this, you can chase another survivor ( if that survivor who used decisive strike it's on safe tiles is not worth, even he's not hooked yet, he's wasting your time ) on generator to keep pressuring them at beginning of game you don't need to tunnel, cuz you waste time with that survivor and then generators are done in meantime, you need to pressure generators and survivor's orientation, tunneling, slugging, camping are made when you're in good position to doing them

[@VATIISTA]

When tunnelling u don’t have any pressure in general imo. Having a survivor on hook while chasing another and getting them hooked puts way more pressure on survivors

[@cryptidwife_]

From my experience (as a survivor main) the tunneling is truly an issue because i'd say at least 50% (tbh this is almost EVERY game for me lately thus i've stopped playing) of the time 1 survivor spawn VERY close to the killer or the killer has Lethal Pursuer, and said survivor goes down almost instantly in the match, then someone will go unhook and even try to protect the person but get ignored and the person goes down again. At this point the other 2 players may have been smart and working on gens but in a case of random team mates it's a toss up, but after the 2nd down of the same player usually a 3rd or even 4th team mate will show up and try to help the tunneling. USUALLY this still fails and while still at 5 or by some miracle 4 gens someones already dead. Then the game is pretty much over because it's a 3v1 about 1 to 2 mins in.

[@notcaboose4415]

scott black red green mana

[@psychabscond]

12:40 - Yeah, almost like a radius of terror...

[@darkarchon1103]

what you say its true, it's not effective, and lately it seems like people like otz and others think off the record is too strong a perk, because they rely so much on tunneling to win against certain people. even a recent 1947 blight win streak lost because 3 people brought anti tunnel perks, too many people rely on it, instead of map pressure

[@Matt-ci1yl]

MMR absolutely does not separate babies. I watch them get tunneled out of the game every single game and then the killer wins.

[@antwan3212]

Bro is a baby

[@Matt-ci1yl]

@@antwan3212 all the more reason i am correct albeit correct and a baby

[@ecclecticsayonce5131]

If this was the ow devs they’d argue consistency is worth equalizing skill

[@0xEF666]

I discovered tunneling as a strategy in 2017 and even after all these years it is the best and most reliable way to win. I only play on the Nurse and Spirit, purely mathematically, even not very fast 3 downs will make a game 3v1, which makes a huge difference. If you look at Momo's recent losses in winstreak at Oni and Blight, he lost in part because he lost the target that he was tunneling. If you want to win - tunnel and play the wake you like.

[@adas2090]

yep

[@slavajuri]

He was actively throwing in order to tunnel those players, though. They were kind of rookie mistakes, tbh. That just plays into the point of the video, though. If you tunnel like no tomorrow and do it poorly, you lose. That's it. Nurse, Spirit, Blight, Oni - these aren't average killers, either. Killers with high mobility and high lethality only get punished for tunneling if the player really messes it up. The same just isn't true for many others.

[@scottsurvival6960]

11:50 "if you don't tunnel, you ignore half of people's builds sometimes". Yes, but few players use DS and OTR, especially together. I am high MMR at Xenomorph and I rarely see an anti tunneling build unless it's a strong SWF and I can usually beat them anyway because Xeno is pretty darn strong and I play him pretty well. I definitely am more likely to tunnel if I sense it's a strong team, and even if they have anti tunneling perks it's still easier to beat than if I don't tunnel. If I don't tunnel a good swf then I will often get 0k with 8 hooks.

[@ScottJund]

Its only rare because they nerfed DS. Once they buff it again you'll see it come back in full force, i guarantee it

[@scottsurvival6960]

@@ScottJund I agree, but that's not the environment yet.

[@syn4621]

i have doubts about everything you said in ur post

[@scottsurvival6960]

@@syn4621 Thanks.

[@ScottJund]

@@scottsurvival6960fair

[@ThePhantomSquee]

I encountered my first Tunnel-Brain Nemesis yesterday, so this is pretty timely. For whatever reason, guy picked me to be his target, but my teammates were smart about coordinating and I was able to keep him busy for about 3 gens, so everyone else escaped. I'm not normally a fan of teabagging at the exit gates, but that killer earned every mashed Shift key they gave him.

[@MAC_HAMMER]

I completely agree, the smoothest tunnels present themselves when you're chasing others. Chef's kiss*

[@giantsweet1472]

Tunneling a survivor is the most efficient strategy if you have a build for it and there are many builds that allow you to tunnel and not lose half the gens. Also, that aurvivor may theoretically have the entite map to use in chase, but if you keep hooking them in deadzones or other disadvantageous spots for the survivor, it's really easy to get them out quickly.

[@mcr00kes]

I like this take a lot, and as a player who likes spreading the pain and unease in my games, I find those matches give me much more time than those if I get caught in a tough chase. It's more enjoyable, more creative and just feels like I use my brain more.

[@mayuwu4408]

When I play killer I'm just mindlessly wandering. I do tunnel on occasion except it's by complete accident because I can't ever remember who I've already hooked. My gameplay loop is stab a bunch of people, down someone, hook, wander away sometimes near gens until I find someone else, go for the unhooker unless I found someone else, repeat. I usually just go for the first person I see lmao

[@norne9]

Same, i'm too dumb to keep track of hooks

[@tanez778]

So basically the enitre part of macro management being lost if you tunnel does not exist even for your base gameplay. Woops. Head empty no thoughts

[@scottsurvival6960]

9:18 "If you think about it this way, someone with a full anti tunneling build takes more hits to hook than a healthy survivor." Yes, but it takes fewer hits to KILL them than a survivor that you have not hooked before. There is a reason that survivors will desperately try to body block and take hits for and protect a survivor that has been hooked twice. Getting a survivor out of the game as soon as possible is the strongest thing a killer can do, full stop.

[@mattavenson7542]

It depends. Can tunneling be really useful? In lower to mid MMR for sure works wonderfully. Higher MMR it might not go as planned. Usually whoever comes off the hook has 1. Experienced what kind of chaser the killer is. 2. Knows their tiles nearby to run to after taking the endurance hit. 3. Has an innate desire to not get immediately thrown back on the hook and will put their best chase on to slow the tunnel down. So essentially at an upper MMR it really doesn't work all the time to tunnel. Even if you get a quick down on the tunnel, there's the fair chance that there's an anti-tunnel perk to help them or a teammate with a plan to get them out of the killer's grasp. So go ahead and tunnel. Just don't complain that you're getting steamrolled by "comp squads" or "bully squads" because you're the one that cheesed your way to the big leagues and now you're realizing that strategy is only effective if you have your macro game sense in order.

[@Philscooper]

TL:DR yes if the survivor is the weakest link and has no anti-tunnel no if the survivor knows how to loop and possibly even anti-tunneling perks still unfun for both sides IMO

[@Philscooper]

then theres also just equiping a tunneling build : STBFL, rapid brutality,

[@auzell1449]

I never tunnel (intentionally) but considering literally every comp killer does it I'm pretty sure that's just an automatic "yes"

[@bread7144]

I've been watching your videos for years and you're always spot on in almost every regard in all discussions

[@Joeysworldtour315]

5:25 MMR is far from strict. They raised the cap but that’s it. The fact that Otz can do winstreaks again proves that SBMM is dead and we are back to rank based matchmaking again.

[@sevendaystocry2546]

the player base is not big enough for SBMM, otherwise the stronger players would never get a game.

[@NamekianPOSTBOY]

The one thing that I want to add is that when it comes to tunneling in lower skill games is that the learning curve between survivor and killer are completely different. Factoring that in, I feel that tunneling is a bigger problem there. Tunneling is an easy to understand strategy that any killer can do (some better than others). It also easily lines up with the main objective for killers. One of the biggest cons it feels is that 'rolling the dice' on tunneling one surv is that you leave the other survs to their own devices. Problem is, surv killers dont always (my personal experience when I was starting out, rarely) fix gens, progressing the game. I feel that beginner survivors are very much so focused on hiding because they dont fully know how to interact with the killer and the purpose of getting chased. They'll hide when the killer is halfway across the map because 'they are listening to their instincts and trying to not die.' That of course will actually hurt their chances of surviving. Boiled down, DBD is an asymmetrical objective racing game but I think that is lost on the survivor side more so at the start. Typically from what I found, a beginner game with tunneling goes: Killer finds one person and hooks them, tunnels / camps them because they want a kill and thats the most straightforward way of getting one, other survivors hide because they are 'surviving,' barely any gen progress is made and that one player dies, making a comeback near impossible.

[@triggeredcripple8668]

Tunneling is a tool that killers have at their disposal. In certain situations, it's the best tool for the job, whereas in others it's like trying to use a screwdriver to drive in a nail. It might work, but its way less effective and you also might lose a lot in the process. There's other times where it's a viable strategy, but not required, and it's up to the killer to decide to tunnel or not. Imo its not a question of whether or not its effective, because each game is different and it's up to the killer to decide if it's the best strategy. If i had to say "is it the best strategy or not", id say no, because in most situations its not the best strategy

[@dezignatedkiller1359]

Also in this same vein I've heard multiple people complain about not being able to gain pips playing as killer. I've also noticed when these same people who complain about not getting pips are playing killer that they always tunnel the same survivor until death. If you look at the breakdown of how pips are gained hitting a survivor directly off hook loses you "points" towards that emblem. If you never kick gens or use gens perks you lose the points that go towards that emblem. If the survivors finish the gens while you are concentrating on that one person and open the door you lose points towards that emblem. The emblem systems is comprised of many small "micro-transactions" that win and lose you points depending on how you play so getting that one kill actually doesn't help you at all.

[@davidodonohoe1773]

Focusing out a player early is a good idea but in certain instances it can be more beneficial than others. Focusing our a player can also force altruism which can tilt a team into doing things they shouldn’t. Opposite of this is doing what the survivors want to help them win.

[@GammaGreed]

As someone who tends to play killer probably 20ish%more survivor I tend to ramp up or down how I play as I go and how the match progresses. Typically after an unhook if i go to contest it ill hit the saver if it the option is there, splitting pressure. If the unhooker dips and the poor hooked is there or runs to me im not gunna ingore them if the match is even or going in their favor. If the game is goin heavely in my favor, high hooks low gens i split up the hooks intentionally to give them and me a more time and less frustration.The few times ive gone out of my way to hard tunnel them, the survivors have me against the wall and 8 times out of 10 they all still get out. I think more often than not if there is a survivor that wants to be chased and I can tell they know what theyre doing Ill ignore them and focus on the other 3. Being tunneled fuckin sucks so unless the survivors are really pushing me to the brink. I do my best not to hard tunnel, i play solo q a lot so i dont have back up when the killer choose to do it to me. But I will casually tunnel if things align and they end up in my sights on more even footed games.

[@xlarisenroselx]

As someone who plays both sides equally, and doesn't really care how the other side feels about my choices in a video game (my objective isn't to entertain them, it's to either kill them or escape them)... The only real reason I say that tunneling someone out usually is detrimental and I tend to avoid it if possible nowadays, is strictly becuz Borrowed Time is base kit. If that change was never made, my opinion would be a resounding yes, becuz it's absurdly easy to do so at that point, and a 3v1 is easier than a 4v1. However, due to base kit BT, you first have to either hit them at hook to force the Endurance out (thus, giving them several seconds and a speed boost to boot, making them harder to tunnel), or you have to not hit anyone, chase the unhooked person for around 5-10 seconds without swinging (and heaven forbid they have Off the Record), then finally hit them - and in that time, you could have likely downed the unhooker, rather than the unhookee. *Especially* if you run Make Your Choice (which, in my opinion, is a pretty slept-on perk). Combine this with the perks people already like to run just to counter tunneling (Decisive Strike, Unbreakable in case you can't pick them up, other Survivors having Flashlights and/or Background Player+Breakout to make sure you can't tunnel them out)... It's just not worth it. Not to mention the various perks that *want* you to hook multiple people, not just one till death.... Grim Embrace, Friends Till The End, No Way Out... Hell, even killer powers like Legion's want all 4 survivors to be alive for as long as possible, to make their gameplan easier to achieve!

[@cryguy0000]

I think tunneling is the best strategy if incorporated well enough in gameplay. After you hook a person, go get the other survivors off gens, damage them and whatnot and shortly after the unhook go back and get them again. Of course a big part of it is how fast you can down them, but if done well it really can be devastating. One less survivor can really slow down the progress of a match. There are obviously some inconsistent factors like how good survivors are in chase, how often they're doing gens, your perks, the survivor's perks. Obviously purely tunneling without acknowledging other survivors is a bad idea, it's when you properly space it out with gen pressure when it's at its most deadly

[@dearcastiel4667]

If your results are 50% "Yes tunneling is the best strategy" that means tunneling is the best strategy, because the other 50% will not agree on a single other best strategy, tunneling having 50% makes it the best strategy in the game, all the other strategies are in the remaining 50% of votes.

[@Braden1617]

I stated in my video when I talked about the game last year that gen rushing is just gonna be a thing. There’s nothing you can do about it on killer side other than trying to get around to all survivors cause if you only focus one and their decent, gens will always fly and ppl called me an asshole for saying that.

[@maximo88able]

The problem with your logic is that even if they have the entire map my teammates are still gonna go down in 30 seconds for that reason tunneling is the best strategy also i am the only idiot that uses off the record so most killers dont have a problem with antitunneling perk

[@thalosas]

Most of the time I find when a killer is tunneling, the guy who does the first unhook will follow the killer around trying to get them to chase them instead so now you're pressuring 2 people with one chase and after the second unhook all 3 other survivors will start following you so now you're pressuring the whole team with a single chase and once it's over it's a 1v3 from there so you've pretty much won. If all 4 survivors play correctly and the person you're tunneling is half decent you'll lose, but 90% of the time in soloQ things just progressively fall apart after the first unhook happens and if you can get to that point with 2 or 3 gens left you've basically already won from getting a single hook state.

[@JakeobE]

3:43 Scott is the Equalizer, confirmed

[@SebuTK]

“Scott” “Jund” is secretly god’s eepiest soldier

[@killak2971]

Not the best but this is the only way to destroy the SWF.

[@hexlupo]

"Brainless Unga Bunga Tunneling" is the type that's been going on for almost 8 months now. And it's taking the fun out of DBD. I have a build of: Off the Record, Decisive Strike, Dead Hard and Made for This. The build can be fun, and I felt it necessary at times to run. But it shouldn't have to be like this CONSISTENTLY for almost a year straight.

[@sherif7491]

If that many people feel the need to tunnel maybe the real problem ain't tunneling

[@syn4621]

​@@sherif7491 nah you don't get it every killer is a scumbag that goes out of their way to make survivors miserable, that's the only explanation!

[@mckookie2967]

U only need otr and to be good in chase, i get tunneled, 2-3 gens pop and half the time I'll escape and if I don't everyone else does which is a W for me

[@TauuFps]

The thing is, with everything you said, the assumption is that the other survivors are playing optimally. In reality, the other survivors often come to try and save their teammate and get off of gens themselves. This is true when I play usually, both while i’m playing survivor and killer

[@wjrg7180]

It's an interesting discussion. As someone who has played the game over 2k hours about equally on both sides, it like most things comes down to the situation. Depending on how the mid-game is going I might feel the need to tunnel a person out by 5th, maybe even 4th hook, but otherwise I try to mix up targets for many of the reasons you mentioned.

[@Doctor_Perry]

Scott Spund

[@demonslayer8451]

Quinton

[@dimitricandeiracistaro4543]

Scott, altough your analysis is vsry convincing, it highly disregards the unpredictable nature of survivor play (not perk choise or chase effectiveness) i've seen UNBELIEVABLE situations frequently in solo Q where tunelling won the killer the game because of the survivors macro game. I think for solo queue tunelling is the best for killer (maybe its because of the brazilian player base here idk).

[@dimitricandeiracistaro4543]

I had a game on the artist's map once where i got chased by a blight for MINUTES but the game was extremely hard even after all the time tunelling cuz of my team. I constantly saw a sable that would crouch around the map and wander instead of doing gens, i also saw mikaelas doing that, i also say my 3 teams commit to the middle gen REFUSING to reset or heal, just get unhooked by me and run to the gen and die... I also got tunneled on the plague map, my team didnt take hits for me, but once i was being taken to the hook, 2 of them piled up to take hits, the killer had save the best for last and he downed both and hooked me🙃. So yeah, solo Q is hell and tunnelling will be the best strat more often than not.

[@dimitricandeiracistaro4543]

Maybe I am seeing a static scenario by being a solo Q player too... Idk man, i just cant take it anymofe

[@atrozzorta9602]

His analysis isn't very convincing though, he said a lot of shit without actually saying anything. He mentioned macro gameplay knowledge is better than his definition of that was "knowing where things are at the right time" which doesn't make any sense. He is one of MANY people that said getting into high MMR is insanely easy and everyone can do it, but now all of a sudden a casual player is completely incapable of making it to high MMR so they want "both sides of the argument". He talked about nothing while acting like he was talking about something. And if you want proof of that ask him if the game is survivor or killer sided because I guarantee you will get the same response, a whole lot of nothing explaining nothing, but in this video he said the game is massively survivor sided. 8:15 he says the comp players said killers would lose way more if there weren't all these restrictions to limit what survivors can do, but he will also tell you the game is balanced or slightly killer sided.

[@fullnelson4986]

This Scott dude is a survivor shill and it shows @atrozzorta9602

[@sevendaystocry2546]

he is virtue signalling to his survivor sided viewers@@atrozzorta9602

[@Xili84]

Before I watch this video any further to where Scott tells his opinion on why its so 50/50... I'm calling it on the difference between the MMR's. 50% said yes: At high MMR you really need 1 person out asap unless you want to get gen rushed (5mins or less)... the other 50% says no cause they are at low MMR.

[@mckookie2967]

This.

[@atrozzorta9602]

I'd say it's more likely that survivor mains said no because that would invalidate all the whining they have done for years, and would incentivize and encourage more killers to tunnel if they admitted tunneling was the best strategy for killers. PLUS a lot of survivor mains have never touched killer and the couple times they have they have been against babies which anyone with the ability to move their killer and attack will automatically win. But I do agree that MMR plays a big role in the discussion as well.

[@Leaf__22]

Yeah no

[@muysli.y1855]

It is not harder to tunnel at high mmr ? I think its the opposite its more effective against low surv So nope you are wrong if tunneling works then you are playing against decent Surv and not pro player

[@LuckyKat89TV]

You get rushed bc you ignore gens

[@goblinking1349]

If you play a low mobility killer like Clown or Nemesis, tunneling is almost required to win against great SWFs. The main issue is that if you switch targets and choose not to tunnel, great survivors will communicate and pre-run away from you. Even if your macro sense (or information perks) tells you exactly where to go, by the time you arrive the survivor that was there will be far away, and holding W toward a safe tile. So, when you finally catch up with the other survivor, you have spent 30-45 seconds getting there and you still have to deal with a safe tile, except the survivor you are against is healthy and hasn't been hooked yet. You effectively ended up wasting tons of time for a worse target. I've notice you tend to favor killers with good mobility (Wraith, Billy, Demogorgon, Wesker, etc), so pre-running is not as big of a deal to you. But if you stick to say, playing Clown for a while, I strongly suspect you'd change your point of view about tunnelling.

[@KozmoPoly]

To me tunneling is a tool. Strategy is more of how you use your tools (killer power, perk loadout, etc). Tunneling is a great tool to build pressure when used correctly, and unfortunately a shortcut to "victory" by bad killers when versing unaware survivors

[@ThePotchili]

it's one of those arguments where despite the point being clear and present, people will still disagree for the sake of argument

[@garbagegarage4525]

Sometimes it just occurs that I catch a survivor off guard who has already been hooked but then accusing of tunneling is a bit ridiculous as they had time to heal. Then I think they maybe would need to be more careful and stealthy rather than literally giving me a free sacrifice.

[@4zir856]

i played 1,5 year ago bubba with facecamping strategy, and if you get your first down quite early, it was a 4 k guarantee. If the survivor played safe and i needed like 2 minutes after the start, it resulted in 2-3 kills. The 1 minute hook timer is really short if survivor dont bring perks to prolong it.

[@royalripper7453]

5:30 i believe people like that are mistaking MMR for Prestige- Recently (legit week or two ago) i was told by a friend that their matches are horrible when they just started, so i tried it out on a completely fresh account- meaning i was in the lowest possible MMR , and in the SECOND match i already had 2 survivors with Prestige 100 characters.

[@CakeDayZ]

I remember when every survivor would just jump in a locker after hook, and killer would giga-respect the DS.

[@countergoose5313]

It think it mostly depends on the strength of the tunneling killer. If your playing blight or nurse then it’s pretty much always the strongest choice.

[@danowen79]

Tunnelling is the best strategy because when people say the other three players will just get gens done… that is rarely true in practice. People either don’t help and the tunnelling is successful too quickly, or they try and help and gens don’t get done. And often the person getting tunnelled knows it’s happening and give up, or dc. Most people aren’t gifted survivors players able to run killers to make the tunnel not worth the effort.

[@Default_Claudette_Morrel]

This. I’ve seen ppl drop within 10-15 secs after

[@kaib6998]

which makes the whole "I need to tunnel to have a chance against all these comp squads" even more absurd

[@blabla1706]

The killers tunnel in most of my surv matches. When they tunnel the random without OTR, DH or DS its usually very effective and the random is dead on 4 gens. Its a combination of the surv getting tunneled not lasting long and rest of team are not effecient enough on gens. But sometimes the tunnel victim is a decent looper with OTR and the killer gets 1 or 2 kills max and the rest of the survs run out the door.

[@captainpancakes1893]

Hard tunneling has its strengths, mainly against people who aren't prepared for it and babies. But soft tunneling absolutely works wonders, but its also the worst thing to deal with if you aren't prepared for it as well or just don't like getting chased, which i have a personal feeling that alot if people don't like the chase.

[@scriptures7025]

I appreciate the thoughts on this. I think you had some good points. But I would argue that all of your map and game knowledge isn’t wasted in a tunnel situation, if anything it helps. The better you get at the game, the easier it is to tunnel people. But I can appreciate the ending and how you put it, good stuff. You got a sub

[@1800mexicano]

The only way I've ever tunneled someone is if one person keeps coming to me cause they want the chase. So I end up running in to them until they are the first one out

[@catehunter5246]

Personally, I used to play killer and survivor equally, now I play mainly survivor. When I used to play killer I wouldn't tunnel, but I would ignore survivors baiting me into chases (flashlight clicking/teabagging/moonwalking in front of me) as they most likely had chaser builds so I'd waste my time with a survivor that would most likely play at top level with minimal mistakes. I would get into chase and mentally keep count on if I needed to drop chase or a survivor was in too safe of loops/time wasters. I would target easier downs--like if I downed a Feng within 20 seconds of a chase if I saw the Feng again while I was in chase with another survivor I'd peel off and go for them. Getting rid of the weak links cause more pressure when you get rid of numbers in play. I think a big issue in DbD is psuedo-tunneling (false tunneling) as you mentioned Scott in a previous video. The unhooker re-immerses themselves and leaves the freshly unhooked person to deal with the killer again. I've literally seen killers pause and look around for the unhooker as in saying "give me something else to chase", they don't want to tunnel, but sometimes killers are forced to chase what they see. I've run in front of a freshly unhooked person when the unhooker goes back to immersion mode to take a hit and killers usually go onto me. Yeah, it sucks that the killer gets a free hit but at the same time, it keeps another survivor in play. Tunneling is situational, but when I see killers tunnel immediately off hook when the game just has begun (as in 4 gens still up and the first down happened

[@telvanniis]

it objectively is and anyone who says its not are coping. if you can tunnel the weak link out at 5 gens you will basically always win. the only defense against tunneling is to not have a weak link in chase, whereas there are many defenses against the other killer strategies.

[@unholydbd]

200iq move to get killers to stop tunneling. Well done Scott

[@AlsoMeowskivich]

tunneling is as viable a strat as any other: a great idea when appropriate. I think I only force tunnels when I'm trying to do a mori daily or something (and even then, I tend to try to let rancor do its thing passively). Otherwise, I tend to think of tunneling as "the obvious option"™ when you stumble upon two survivors and one you've hooked twice and is still injured vs the fresh one you've just now seen for the first time in the game. Like, of course I'm going to choose the easy target. There's all sorts of factors, but at this point we're just preachin' to the choir.

[@SiBORG.]

Reverend Lovejoy said it best; Short answer yes with an if, long answer no with a but

[@manuserg1082]

Tunneling has always and will always be the best strategy to use against people that aren't exclusively comp level survivors specifically in a 4 man. Comp survivor 4 man > anything killer can do. Anything below that < tunneling killers will win, especially if running slowdown ontop of it.

[@muysli.y1855]

Its a very effective against decent Surv, the better the Surv the harder to tunnel

[@johnwarner4178]

The problem is while that 1 person is being tunneled the other 3 aren’t on gens. Maybe one is, but one is crouching in a bush somewhere and the third is chasing the killer with a flashlight they don’t actually know how to use. Against those teams tunneling is super effective but probably unnecessary

[@ЛеонидКлименко-о1б]

The argument isn't really valid considering just how bad the MMR system is. I have 200 hours in this game, and after two matches of killer, I immediately get thrown into lobbies with survivors who have 2.5k-5k hours. They might not be extremely good at the game, yes, but that huge difference in hours and game knowledge obviously shows.

[@Camohflage]

tunneling is the best thing you can do when it makes sense. there are situations where you really need to reduce the amount of enemies and if you know you can down someone quick then tunneling is the best thing to do. but if you just tunnel the first person you see then you will lose unless you play against bad players

[@DrDoryBlox]

Scottomon Grundy

[@aceofnade]

Very well said homie The only thing, I don't think what you said was subjective. There is truth to killers missing out on macro skills when they tunnel.

[@SgtTankDempsey]

Depends on the situation. If there are still 5 gens, then no, but if it is towards the endgame and no one is dead, I can see it.

[@Epitafffio]

hardtunnelling where you go through all layers of antitunnelling perks is really detrimental unless you play comp where such things are strictly limited. best strategy is simply being conscious of your hooks and not spreading them. pingponging people (switching between 2-3 targets, trying to target a particular person after every other chase, etc) is probably the best strategy overall. you dont overcommit, but you set your priorities right.