Sec 123 to 129 evidence act

  Рет қаралды 10,955

Harpreet Singh Kahlon

Harpreet Singh Kahlon

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 75
@iqbalhothi4575
@iqbalhothi4575 4 жыл бұрын
Hello sir ,🙏,all videos are too much good , it's very helpful ,more and more thank you sir,
@chavinarang2835
@chavinarang2835 2 жыл бұрын
V nice teaching👍🏻
@marvelous_pk4133
@marvelous_pk4133 3 жыл бұрын
Sir the way you teach is marvellous. Whole lectures are worth watching thanks a bunch sir
@sohailsetia2235
@sohailsetia2235 4 жыл бұрын
Very good sir
@advsukhisidhu1321
@advsukhisidhu1321 4 жыл бұрын
Good lecture sir thanks
@vishusinghal2256
@vishusinghal2256 2 жыл бұрын
You are great, very helpful sir. Thank you.
@parthmahajan7457
@parthmahajan7457 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir Really Helpful 🙏
@tanweeransari3661
@tanweeransari3661 4 жыл бұрын
Overall excellent sir😍
@My_lyf99
@My_lyf99 Жыл бұрын
Amazing lecture
@asifhussain5989
@asifhussain5989 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you ❤️❤️❤️
@Rakesh-in8zk
@Rakesh-in8zk 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir ji 🙂
@imaramalik7690
@imaramalik7690 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Paji 😌😌😌😌
@kumargaurav1385
@kumargaurav1385 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 🙏
@nikitafromuttarakhand6800
@nikitafromuttarakhand6800 2 жыл бұрын
Thnq
@muskaanverma8459
@muskaanverma8459 2 жыл бұрын
Thanku sir☺
@nikitafromuttarakhand6800
@nikitafromuttarakhand6800 2 жыл бұрын
Sir section 130 , 131 and 132 bhi cover kar dijiyr please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@mandeepkaurmahi0762
@mandeepkaurmahi0762 2 жыл бұрын
👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻💯
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj 4 жыл бұрын
Thku sir😊🙏🏻
@rameshsarwan6052
@rameshsarwan6052 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@himansh98
@himansh98 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks u so much sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@simrankaurheer9419
@simrankaurheer9419 5 ай бұрын
Thankyou sir❤❤
@nitesh148
@nitesh148 5 жыл бұрын
simple and best
@Ankit123zinking
@Ankit123zinking 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir
@sachhidanandupadhyay2576
@sachhidanandupadhyay2576 4 жыл бұрын
Which book do you refer while making evidence law videos?
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
I make my notes after reading 10 books, so then I prepared my notes accordingly
@surajpandey6240
@surajpandey6240 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, i have a doubt, as to what if a person had committed murder and he communicates all the details to his advocate. Then the advocate calls the police and says everything that had been communicated to him by the person. The police takes immediate action and discover a knife on which there are blood stains of victim and fingerprint of the murderer. In this case what will happen???
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
Advocate gives it's information to police and to court, moreover it's not evidence against the accused what the advocate said to police as its totally hearsay evidence, moreover if without any statement of accused to police, police discover weapon independently then no evidence be used against accused
@surajpandey6240
@surajpandey6240 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, even if the evidence discovered is so relevant then also it cannot be used against him??
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
Relevant if it is discovered on the basis of accused's statment
@surajpandey6240
@surajpandey6240 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, that means the court "will" not admit the evidence??
@anandshekhar6348
@anandshekhar6348 3 жыл бұрын
@@surajpandey6240 yes
@Sehrawat_legal002
@Sehrawat_legal002 4 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 sir
@article32ubijusibiremedium96
@article32ubijusibiremedium96 4 жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir
@GurdeepSingh-bh4zw
@GurdeepSingh-bh4zw 3 жыл бұрын
sir, section 162 ke mutabik document inspect karne ke baad hi pta chalega, ke vo state affair se related hai ya nahi, court kaise inspect kregi..
@rituchhoker6363
@rituchhoker6363 4 жыл бұрын
Nice 👍
@ShubhamKumar-ji7yf
@ShubhamKumar-ji7yf 4 жыл бұрын
Can Rafale deal comes under Section 123?
@gurvindersinghtaneja8727
@gurvindersinghtaneja8727 3 жыл бұрын
sir incase police kisi person ka naam ya identity disclose krti hai and govt se rewards dilvaati hai to kya section 125 or 124 me nhi aata
@sanjeevverma9789
@sanjeevverma9789 4 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌
@ProPakistani-r4t
@ProPakistani-r4t 4 жыл бұрын
Good lecture, better to read the whole section of every statute
@rohit11120
@rohit11120 5 жыл бұрын
thnks to u😊
@chandraprabhaupadhyay3272
@chandraprabhaupadhyay3272 2 жыл бұрын
sir in the last part you were saying something about the guidelines but it is not complete. can we get this from google by reading the case?
@himansh98
@himansh98 4 жыл бұрын
Sir ek query hai agar person legal advisor se advice le rha hai or agar kisi third person ne hear kar liya to kya wo bared hai ya nhi
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
No
@himansh98
@himansh98 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@harshgupta1914
@harshgupta1914 4 жыл бұрын
Sir agar client ko proceeding ke samay advocate se koi problem a rahi hai to vo apni file vapis le kar koi or advocate kar leta hai to purane wala advocate dusri party ke advocate ko apni clients ki kamia bata sakta hai taki vo case har jae.
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
Then tere is no solution , but client may file a suit to restrain him to disclose anything to any person, moreover the same fall under 126
@omparkashchhabra6874
@omparkashchhabra6874 4 жыл бұрын
Good morning sir, Pl. let me know about the planing to deliver lecture on CPC.
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
It's a art, if comes with knowledge and confidence, if u have both u can easily deliver the lecture
@rachitagrawal8922
@rachitagrawal8922 4 жыл бұрын
Sir today I watched your this video first time. Your videos is really helpful for us. Thanks for this video. Sir privilege communication and professional communication same ही है क्या??
@OnLexWay
@OnLexWay 2 жыл бұрын
No
@sports__shorts.
@sports__shorts. 3 жыл бұрын
Sir sec 125 includes judicial and executive majistrates both?
@sohailsetia2235
@sohailsetia2235 4 жыл бұрын
Sir evidence act starting sections the with case laws honu chaye the
@chandankushwaha4214
@chandankushwaha4214 4 жыл бұрын
Sir section 130 and 131 ni mil rha h
@Msaheb9740
@Msaheb9740 2 жыл бұрын
section 129 ulta bata diya sir apne privilige client ko mili hai ki vo disclose na kare naki legal advisor ko.
@rudrakshawasthi188
@rudrakshawasthi188 4 жыл бұрын
sir I want you to make a video regarding case laws under evidence act section wise from sectio 1 to section 167 pls sir
@TheLawSession
@TheLawSession 4 жыл бұрын
Respected sir With due respect i dont agree sec 129 u explained. This sec says that client may b complelled to disclose confidential communication if he offers himself as a witness. Usman abid
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
Sections 126, 127 and 128 deal with the situation where legal practioners are prohibited to disclose confidential communication whereas Section 129 imposes obligations upon the client not to disclose any confidential communication before the court given by his legal adviser. The disclosure of communication under section 129 should be enforced when it is strictly necessary. “To enable a counsel or solicitor to nip litigation in the bud by timely warning or suggestion, an expert knowledge of the fact is necessary; but if professional communications be embarrassed by any fear of disclosure, advice would have to be given on maimed or distorted statements.” The principle laid down in this section is basically formulated “on exigencies of human affairs.” The effect of the section is that a person cannot be compelled to disclose any confidential communication which has taken place between him and legal professional adviser. Confidential communications between client and advocate have protection from compulsory disclosure. Neither the advocate nor the client is any obligation to spell it to a third person. Hope u get the ponit
@TheLawSession
@TheLawSession 4 жыл бұрын
Thanx sir thats what i mean too. This is usman abid advocate from pakistan preparing for judicial exam. Getting help from ur lectures coz evidence Act and qanoon e shahad are almost same. God bless u sir
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
@@TheLawSession welcome brother and I wish you best of luck
@simerjeetsingh9994
@simerjeetsingh9994 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, if accused calls his advocate to disclose his communication for his benefit only some part of their communication , can his advocate be cross examined on the question to expalin what he said or their whole communication Under sec 128 and 129 ?
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
No, without the consent of his client he can't disclose
@kajaldhiman2230
@kajaldhiman2230 5 жыл бұрын
guru Ji.🙏 As per sec 126 the communication between Advocate and his client is barred from disclosure.if supposing the case is between Advocate and his client as aforesaid can Advocate disclose the confidential communication made in course or for the purpose of employment ??
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 5 жыл бұрын
Not at all, but with the consent of client he can do so
@kajaldhiman2230
@kajaldhiman2230 5 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot guru Ji.🙏 one more question under sec 129 the expression provided unless he offers himself as a witness.guruJi.🙏 here party per se becoming a witness or calling a legal advisor as a witness ?
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 5 жыл бұрын
Court can ask any question for the end of justice, if the person himself appeared as a witness than court can compel him to answer the question but not to those question answers of which criminate him for some penalty.
@harshgupta1914
@harshgupta1914 4 жыл бұрын
Sir jo apne communication during marriage wali example di thi sir usme judge ke samne husband consent de sakta hai ki bata do agar nahi to judge ko kese pata chalega ki husband ne consent di hai ki tum yeh baat bata do
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
He has to give his consent which is to be proved by wife
@harshgupta1914
@harshgupta1914 4 жыл бұрын
Sir apka matlab hai ki wife prove karegi court me ki mere husband ne consent di hai ki tum bata do
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 4 жыл бұрын
Obviously
@harshgupta1914
@harshgupta1914 4 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thnku sir
@lawcraze1021
@lawcraze1021 5 жыл бұрын
Good morning sir g Section 128 and section 129 mein same confusion hai wo ye ke agar A ny B ko as an advocate engage nai kiya and bas apny case k facts btaye and bad mein C ko as an advocate engage kar liya .To court mein A as witness B and C dono ko bula sakta hai ya sirf C ko jisy us nay as an advocate engage kiya tha. and B jisy facts btaye thay as an advocate engage nai kiya tha ?Matlab ye k jisy engage kiya wo advocate a sakta hai as witness ya phir jisy engage nai kiya bas case k facts btaye thay wo b a sakta hai ?
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 5 жыл бұрын
He can cl to his advocate only
@gayatrijoshi3314
@gayatrijoshi3314 3 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@tanweeransari3661
@tanweeransari3661 4 жыл бұрын
Sir sorry to say but the illistrations nd explanation which u have used in sec 124 ,was incorrect. That will apply to 125 124 deals with official communications .means the communication wich happens between officials persons..not the information recieved by others... Eg. If the police persons communicate between them how to raid in perticular place..then the shall not be compelled to disclose the planing communication.... Kindly reply if i am wrong.thnk u
@ravindarsingh8175
@ravindarsingh8175 4 жыл бұрын
130 1 31
Sec 133 accomplice
39:13
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Sec 135 to 143 examination of witness
33:23
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Support each other🤝
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 75 МЛН
She made herself an ear of corn from his marmalade candies🌽🌽🌽
00:38
Valja & Maxim Family
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Estoppel sec 115 evidence act
1:03:34
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Oral evidence  sec 59 to 61
47:01
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Opinion of third person (sec 45 to 51)
53:45
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Sections 144-150 of India Evidence Act 1872
16:34
Theory of Abrogation
Рет қаралды 154 М.
Sec 145 to 152 evidence act
41:11
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Burden of proof 101 to 111
1:09:33
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Need Achievement And Spiritual Intelligence
31:32
Developing Soft Skills and Personality
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Presumption sec 113 to 114 evidence act
43:47
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Expert evidence introduction sec 45
58:11
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Dying declaration sec 32(1)
1:06:55
Harpreet Singh Kahlon
Рет қаралды 13 М.