Your classes is helping me to clarify some concepts
@bevinmaultsby21 күн бұрын
I'm glad to hear that!
@maxrybold15317 ай бұрын
I used this tutorial to brush up my understanding of characteristic equations that describe the behavior of a spring mass damper system to confirm simulation results, via Desmos, of essentially the same system outlined in a SolidWorks tutorial textbook. Great explanations, thanks!
@bevinmaultsby7 ай бұрын
You're very welcome!
@JulianKimbleUWАй бұрын
What a life saver. Best video I've seen on the topic!
@bevinmaultsbyАй бұрын
Great to hear! Thanks for watching
@samblake995310 ай бұрын
Awesome stuff! Super clear and I love the fade outs and ins!!
@bevinmaultsby10 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
@thomashowe1920 Жыл бұрын
Clear and concise. I wish I had access to this when I took this class.
@bevinmaultsby Жыл бұрын
Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
@NamelessProducts7 ай бұрын
Im trying to learn qualitative analysis of nonlinear 2nd order differential equations and all the examples so far have been in springs. This helped a lot. Thank you.
@bevinmaultsby7 ай бұрын
Excellent! The reason is that spring-mass systems are nice harmonic oscillators (when a system experiences a restoring force proportional to its displacement).
@Ivan-mp6ff6 ай бұрын
so pleasurable to watch, informative and detailed. Pretty in all aspects. Thank you
@bevinmaultsby6 ай бұрын
You’re welcome! Glad you enjoyed it
@rachelb7500Ай бұрын
This was so clear and helpful! Thank you so much for sharing
@bevinmaultsbyАй бұрын
You're welcome!
@ShakilAhmedBhuiyan Жыл бұрын
Very precise lecture. Very easy to understand.
@bevinmaultsby Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@tusharnath24089 ай бұрын
Excellent Video. Thank you for it.
@bevinmaultsby9 ай бұрын
You're very welcome, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
@nowardchaselenkana85967 ай бұрын
clear and straight forward... cheers Doc
@bevinmaultsby7 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Ivan-mp6ff6 ай бұрын
At about 23:23, critical damping, what would be the corresponding units of C1 and C2 in order to be consistent with the dimension of LHS of the equation, i.e.distance? I am trying to do a dimensional analysis on it. Thank you.
@bevinmaultsby6 ай бұрын
Great question! Assuming we are working standard units, C1 would be meters, and C2 would be meters/second. Exponential functions are dimensionless, so we don't associated any units to the first term. Then it would need to be m + (m/s)s. Hope that helps!
@Ivan-mp6ff6 ай бұрын
Thank you for the prompt reply. I was interested in the units because it may shed light on where could they have come from. I am a medical doctor interested in linking engineering science to medical science and your quality uploads help tremendously. Now that I have confirmed by your helped that they are of different units, when I model vibration and natural frequency to living tissues, I know these seemingly arbitrary constants actually come from different sources. Thank you once again for being my virtual tutor Hope your generosity will continue to grace me with more knowledge that will benefit my patients in the near future.
@bevinmaultsby6 ай бұрын
@@Ivan-mp6ff What interesting concepts you must be studying. I'm glad my videos are helpful!
@Jacoblikesyoutube9 ай бұрын
I'm a little lost on the step at 16:45, the last step of the first example. x(t) = cos(2t) because it's the only value at the initial condition that equals 0? So in another situation if both trig functions provided a non-zero output, we might end up with x(t) = c_1 * cos(2t) + c_2 * sin(2t)? Is it effectively always x(t) = c_1 * cos(2t) + c_2 * sin(2t) but the result in the first example simplifies to x(t) = cos(2t)?
@bevinmaultsby9 ай бұрын
Yes--you're understanding this correctly. The general form of the solution is x(t) = c_1* cos(2t) + c_2*sin(2t), where the coefficients c_1 and c_2 are determined by initial conditions. In this particular scenario, with x(0)=1 and x'(0)=0, it turns out that c_1=1 and c_2=0. Here's a different scenario you can work through: if x(0)=2 and x'(0)=1, then c_1 = 2 and c_2 = 1/2. Then the solution would be x(t) = 2*cos(2t) + 1/2 * sin(2t). Does that help?
@Jacoblikesyoutube9 ай бұрын
@@bevinmaultsby Yeah that makes sense! In this scenario you would need to also handling it like the second example that was underdamped?
@bevinmaultsby9 ай бұрын
@@Jacoblikesyoutube Maybe, what do you mean by handling? I want to make sure you're making the right connection between the examples.
@Jacoblikesyoutube9 ай бұрын
@@bevinmaultsby My understanding is that the key difference between the 4 examples is the damping coefficient. In the scenario of your earlier reply where c_1 = 2 and c_2 = 1/2 then the damping effect would be underdamped and thus we would have to find the complex roots values and proceed in a method similar to the 2nd example.
@navanithnavanith7736 ай бұрын
Very clear and precise explanation , helped me understand the concept very quickly. You saved my semester marks 😀😀😀
@bevinmaultsby6 ай бұрын
Glad it helped! Springs are fun :)
@Durr-E-Shehwar-lf3ln2 ай бұрын
Thanks for such explanation ❤️
@bevinmaultsby2 ай бұрын
You are very welcome!
@padraiggluck298018 күн бұрын
Nice presentation. I don’t understand where the t comes from in ex.3 in (c1 + c2*t).
@bevinmaultsby17 күн бұрын
Does this help? kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpqZgKlsoa96b7c
@padraiggluck298017 күн бұрын
@ Yes, thank you.
@reaganjusticeАй бұрын
why cant you be my teacher for diff equ? thank you so much
@bevinmaultsbyАй бұрын
You're very welcome!
@kaartikvij93286 ай бұрын
thanks a lot mam, u really did grt
@bevinmaultsby6 ай бұрын
Thank you! Glad you liked it
@enigmath06308 ай бұрын
Excellent!
@bevinmaultsby8 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@neeb9 ай бұрын
Thank you
@bevinmaultsby9 ай бұрын
You’re welcome!
@mattbabik841711 ай бұрын
I get 12/35 and 2/35 for the last problem when I put it into wolfram alpha to solve
@bevinmaultsby11 ай бұрын
Hmm, I just checked f[t_] := (12/37) Cos[t] + (2/37) Sin[t] f''[t] + .5 f'[t] + 4 f[t] // FullSimplify and got cos(t). How did you evaluate it?
@mattbabik841711 ай бұрын
@@bevinmaultsby oops i missed a minus sign. Sorry for doubting 🙏. Amazing video though. I am trying to understand the math behind MR elastography calculations and this helped a lot on the differential side.
@bevinmaultsby11 ай бұрын
No worries... I'm glad this was helpful, what an interesting subject to study! Good luck.