Madam, you are imparting high quality information on abstruse subject.
@AdvSantoshCZalteSillodDistAura Жыл бұрын
Honourable Madamji Thanks Thanks Thanks for your Best information about the section 65 b of Indian Evidence Act No words to appreciate you and your Talent and Study by Heart I Salute you and your skilful Study with lots of Blessings to you and your family With warm and Great regards Happy New year 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@shrirangagp2856 Жыл бұрын
Some teachers take more time to tell small informations. But you teach large informations in less time. It's really saves students time. Very Usefull. Thank you
@nasreenmulla2951 Жыл бұрын
I too agree with this
@arashadansari13014 жыл бұрын
Itna simplify karke koi nai samjha sakta,, Bravo
@SakshiSingh-rh9uo4 жыл бұрын
Nice very nice ... with example it really BCM easy to understand..may god bless u
@KiranPrajapat-yt6sp4 жыл бұрын
Very well explained ma'am.......mujhe ye video pichhle 2 din se mil nhi rhi thi.....thanku☺️
@narayansingh90893 жыл бұрын
Simple with crux of each clause ,,,Time saving and concept clearing video ,,,well dn Mam
@rozifarooqui28074 жыл бұрын
Amazing vedio in simple language ..👍👍
@harishchaudhry15582 жыл бұрын
Nice and very clear explanation of said sections 🙏🏻
@assameselawchannel89913 жыл бұрын
I was looking for a lecture for this provision , n you helped me .. thanx a ton for making this video :) Stay blessed always .
@NarendraSingh-ol5mx3 жыл бұрын
Explained in its best way possible. Thank you for the video.
@drturaabsuhail4853 жыл бұрын
Very informative video maam. Keep this passion continue maam
@akashbhatia-js3kr Жыл бұрын
A very Much useful video mam.....
@AkshayaCyberCop3 жыл бұрын
Nice one. Please explain the aspect of "responsible official position " with various case scenarios.
@Devrawat00035 ай бұрын
Thank you mem bohut simple form m smja diya samj hi ni aara tha😊
@shekhartalashilkar70634 жыл бұрын
Marvellous lecture.
@siddhantsaraswat668811 ай бұрын
Well crafted lecture ✨
@akshataggarwal86714 жыл бұрын
very informative lecture
@MahakalSena_4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic👌 You explain so well. Thank you so much. God bless you! Request to please upload videos on IPR act
@shwethaa57973 жыл бұрын
Thank you dear for this wonderful lecture.....
@DhanunjayaSrisailamTTT2 жыл бұрын
This is the best video on Section 65. Thank you so much and please let us know what to do if a person uploaded a video on youtube to defame me. Thank you again.
@mukta.manwar.2 жыл бұрын
Superb ma'am........
@paritoshsingh14973 жыл бұрын
Best explanation on youtube
@deeptitamta12172 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, thank you so much
@kanwarsingh29764 жыл бұрын
very very very nice ji
@rohitagrawal84662 жыл бұрын
Very good lecture
@rakshitrawat76132 жыл бұрын
Does bank statements comes under electronic records??
@navneetgupta99744 жыл бұрын
Weather pendrive, cd, dvd and mobile itself are secondary or primary evidence u/s 65B
@SakshiSingh-rh9uo4 жыл бұрын
Great 👍
@DrogoXerxesGaming3 жыл бұрын
It helped a lot Mam, Thank You So Much!! PS:- You Gained A Sub... Keep Up The Good Work.
@megavane2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
@potdareklavya4 жыл бұрын
Nice video, please explain with latest sc judgment on S. 65 B clause 4.
@ganieiqra77514 жыл бұрын
Great
@sarabhjeet0334 жыл бұрын
Well explained 👍
@giridhargoud24502 жыл бұрын
good explanation
@advocateanilpandey76254 жыл бұрын
WELL EXPLAINED!
@nasreenmulla2951 Жыл бұрын
Love you mam❤ you explained very well
@GOLEGAL Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot 😊
@shivrajsalunke52913 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture mam
@kapilachowdary86524 жыл бұрын
ThAnku mam for ur efforts.
@karanll.b35863 жыл бұрын
Very nice mam
@tonyjohn9204 Жыл бұрын
Mam how about screenshot as evidence
@karanyadav80122 жыл бұрын
Thanks ma'am cctv with wrong date is admissible or not
@atulgoyal56513 жыл бұрын
It was superb ma'am !
@priyanka22223 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@karanyadav80122 жыл бұрын
Maam in court can copy of electronic device is admissible like cctv footage copy in pen drive admissible in court without giving dvr and hardisk or not
@mithileshkumarsingh60613 жыл бұрын
Gm mam Any passbook statement under RTI act, and not certificate under 65b can be read in evidence?
@rajatjain93644 жыл бұрын
Text transcript of any audio is called as 65b of evidence act? Or these 2 are different things?
@RajKumar-ie6fp2 жыл бұрын
good infarmaction
@malatheshbarikar755 Жыл бұрын
Hello madam... Lets say a CCTV footage only from the day of alleged assault is recorded and presented and otherwise thr was no recoring from the CCTV on any other day (so not matching with 65B (2) (b) ) Is this admissible??
@projeshbasu891114 күн бұрын
Thanks
@paragshinde70684 жыл бұрын
Is there any duration or days limit for police to ask for 65b for cctv footage.
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
No, but at the time of recording of evidence one has to put a certificate of 65B with their electronic evidence. If they are not filling on that time court MAY create an adverse inference against him.
@paragshinde70684 жыл бұрын
@@GOLEGAL FIR is still not filled but a statement is taken from us by plice and its been 1month they are saying "waiting for 65b for cctv footage from hospital
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
The person who gives electronic evidence has to file the certificate of 65B. In your case if the electronic evidence is filled by Hospital, the person / department who make the copy of that electronic evidence has to file the certificate of 65B. If it is a personal case I don't recommend to share your personal issues in comment section, If you want you can mail us on contactgolegal@gmail.com
@karanyadav80122 жыл бұрын
Thanks ma'am can we detect cctv footage is orignal Or edited
@chandansharma32403 жыл бұрын
Mam Your lecture on this section is outstanding. Thank you so much Mam But I have a doubt mam... Which kind of Evidence it will be taken Primary or Secondary ...?
@fununlimited39942 жыл бұрын
Sir, Maine RTI, Se information maangi thi CPIO ne mujhe response mail bheji under section 8 (I) J he can't share third party information because he is its personal information. I revert him please share response letter by second party for deny to give this information.. So he can share a e - mail to me receive from second party. And print that mail on white paper( hard copy) and share it through courier. Now I demand 65 ( b) certificate from CPIO but he not responded what can I do?
@drealjackjohnson2 жыл бұрын
Hi Ma'am Just had this question If party A had filed a case versus party B.And, Party B has filed a case versus party C. Party B in his cases versus party C has finished his cross examination in chief and oral examination but party C has not. Can party A use the depositions in the case of B vs C in Court case of A Vs B as evidence.l.e his oral deposition and AIE in of B in Case B Vs C by submitting certified copies of the same from the respective court of B Vs C? Thank you Ma'am
@ashutoshagarwal76993 жыл бұрын
In case of an email , who can certify it ?
@saikrishna82074 жыл бұрын
madam namasthe, how long recorded voice document will be valid to file a complaint? what if after 5yrs of the incident
@jyotsnatiwari75522 жыл бұрын
Mam, agar cctv footage chalakar kisi mobile se record kiya gya ho to.. kya ise court me submit kiya ja sakta hai...🙏
@navisingh20533 жыл бұрын
mam kya whatsapp chat k screen shorts proof k tor pe maane jayege? jis phn se screen shorts maine liye vo mere paas nahi hai. 🙏 na hi jiske msg k screen shorts liye thy uske paas bhi ok phn nahi hai....
@RajKumar-ie6fp3 жыл бұрын
Very good infarmation madam ji thanks but Lower courts ke judge sahib Bohet kam follow karte he
@karanshah7804 жыл бұрын
Can a BscIT graduate issue a certificate for Section 65b
@No_MaTteR_wHaT20254 жыл бұрын
Thnkew mam
@artbysunny89504 жыл бұрын
You saved us ❤️
@lavanyalaw6854 жыл бұрын
Kindly make English subtitles available
@kvcookingrecipes7963 Жыл бұрын
I want 65 B form any can give information
@karmaongchuk13243 жыл бұрын
Can you please attach the format of the 'certificate'? Is print out of watsapp conversation admissible under section 65(b)??
@AkshayaCyberCop3 жыл бұрын
There is no prescribed format for Sec. 65B(4). We have to adhere the spirit of law as prescribed under this provision. WhatsApp conversation is admissible in Court of Law, but the mobile phone handset has to be seized and send to SFSL/CFSL for Forensic examination.
@seshu89604 жыл бұрын
Hi madem good morning , please clarify my doubt. I have attached the Mobile Call recording to Gmail 2 years back, it has time and date also in gmail along with attachment . Same day I gave money to someone based on promissory note, Mobile is demaged and I throwed it, Gmail attached call recording can I submit as evidence to the court? If yes, please tel me does it need any certificate, Please reply
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
You can put this on record with certificate.
@seshu89604 жыл бұрын
@@GOLEGAL thanks for the reply, who will provide that certificate?
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
Party through his lawyer has to file this before court when they are going to produce electronic evidence before court.
@hasmukh6222 жыл бұрын
Mail mai stor pada hai to chlega
@shanupandey1700 Жыл бұрын
Mam u r best...can u please 🙏 help me...mujhe 8ko date hai
@knowledgethepower4764 жыл бұрын
Hello mam, last comment sayad Maine Kuch wrong likh diya tha, so now I wants to know your opinion- 1.kya 2017 me bhi under IT act 2000, of section 66A and others IPC me case file ho sakta hai? 2.kisi bhi FB/WhatsApp chat/call detail etc. Lagbhag kitni salo purani Nikal Sakti hai police Apne level pr? 3.yadi victim ne FIR k baqt 65B Ka certificate nhi diya ho aur to aur court ne without reason printed documents ko admissible bhi kr liya ho, kya tab bhi aise case me cross examination un printout pr ho sakta hai ? Please reply in sequence mam!!
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
Answer to your questions 1. Yes, 2017 mein case file ho sakta hai. 2. As per my information jitne salo ki chat pr police ko doubt ho utne salo tak. Pr sirf FIR lodge ho jane k bad, during investigation kr sakti hai. 3. Agr victim ne electronic evidence pesh kie hai or 65b ka certificate nai dia to ye Evidence admissible Nahi hai or jaisa apne kaha k agr admissible kr lia to yes ab app cross examine kr sakte hai
@knowledgethepower4764 жыл бұрын
@@GOLEGAL 2017 me 66A IT act me case kaise darj ho sakta hai jab es section k liye 2014 me shirya बघेल k case me es section ko SC k dwara struck down Kiya Ka chuka hai... 2. Kya yadi koi case 2014 me darj hua hai lekin police ne tab call detail nhi Di court ko, to kya 2020 me trail k baqt de Sakti hai telecom company se lekar. 3.65B Ka certificate na diya ho aur electronic evidence admit kr liye gye ho lekin vo sb manipulate kiye hue ho, kya tab bhi un pr cross ho sakta hai.
@himanschoudhary54723 жыл бұрын
Madam, r u provide judiciary preparation courses???
@kapilnigam66844 жыл бұрын
Mam, क्या मोबाइल पर करी गई रिकॉर्डिंग को evidence treat kiya jayega???
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
Sirf tabhi kia jayega, Jab apne 65b k provision ko follow kia ho
@kapilnigam66844 жыл бұрын
@@GOLEGAL 65B ke provisions kya hai sir??
@navisingh20533 жыл бұрын
@@kapilnigam6684 😂😂😂 are bhai maaro mujhy 😂😂 vahi ton smajhya video mein 😂
@anjum55282 жыл бұрын
Thankuu
@ankushmagji70922 жыл бұрын
Digital evidence deneke bad FIR police station de sakte he
@maqsoodahmad95493 жыл бұрын
is call recording and screenshots consider valid for it?
@GOLEGAL3 жыл бұрын
Only if you have original device with you by which you create those call recording and screenshots.
@livingkingsize80523 жыл бұрын
@@GOLEGAL Madam, what if someone don't have original device but copy of audio evidence in pendrive. Will that be acceptable in court?
@FurryFalcon-xt7ee2 жыл бұрын
Sir mera relationship mere gf ke saath tha aur humne shaadi ka socha bhi tha aur maine uska kafi help kiya but ab uska behavior itna kharab hai ki mai ab marriage nahi kar sakta aur maine apne parents se bhi milaya jabki usne kabhi nahi milaya. Ab vo mujhe force kar rahi hai marriage ke liye. I think vo case karegi whatsapp chat ke binah pe Please suggest
@joyalfreddy32842 жыл бұрын
Good after noon sir! My question is Destroyed original mobile inside memory card voices recorded admissible in court
@advocateanilpandey76254 жыл бұрын
BUT CERTIFICATE IS NOT THERE?
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
I forgot to attach Now please check
@akg_k4 жыл бұрын
Hi Mam, Incase we have a recording in pendrive but don't have the original recorded device. Will it be eligible in the court. Please advise.
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
It is admissible but if the court finds any tampering then it is not reliable.
@AkshayaCyberCop3 жыл бұрын
Please refer Sec. 7 of Information Technology Act.
@bhupendrasolanki96003 жыл бұрын
Sir, यदि कंप्यूटर से किसी साक्ष्य का पेपर प्रिंट आउट लिया गया है और पुलिस के द्वारा उसको कोर्ट में चालान के साथ पेश भी किया जा चुका है परंतु पुलिस ने 65 बी साक्ष्य अधिनियम का प्रमाण पत्र नहीं लगाया है तो इस स्थिति में कोर्ट एविडेंस मान्य करेगी या नहीं please reply 🙏
@stayfit65762 жыл бұрын
👍
@shashank-ny5ih4 жыл бұрын
Is mobile camera footage is valid in court , . If some crime is happening, and is recorded on phone . ?
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is valid only if the person who wants to produce it follows provision of section 65B
@vakeelammai8147 Жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@SUNILKUMAR-fz5mg4 жыл бұрын
Very typical bro, make it easy and funny
@GOLEGAL4 жыл бұрын
Will try 👍🏻
@manyata_sharma12694 жыл бұрын
🤣😂😅.. sorry I am not laughing on you... I am laughing on me... because I am a Illiterate..😂🤣😅
@suniltoppo8348 Жыл бұрын
जितने भी तकनीकी शब्द है सभी English में ही बोलते तो फिर क्लास हिंदी में लेने का क्या मतलब हुआ। हिंदी भाषी छात्रों के लिए आपकी क्लास की कोई उपयोगिता नही है। बेहतर होगा अपनी सारी लेक्चर English में दे हिंदी का उपयोग न करे।