1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1 2. Follow us on: Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530 4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
@lupinsaini20086 жыл бұрын
Section 91 and 92 understood,but under section A to Z,Rule Law Lecture and according to youtube judicial video Act,2018-Theory of abrogation is best judiciary channel in KZbin.Thanks to Najeeb khan,KZbinr(Founder-Theory of abrogation)😉
@rishu96073 жыл бұрын
We students are blessed to have such a wonderful teacher.
@aishafareed32204 жыл бұрын
Bhai, tum jeyou 1000 rou saal,,, god bless u bro,,, u r gem,,,,lots of respect bhai ,,,jazakallah
@PoojaRani-nq6mq6 жыл бұрын
Sir ur way of Teaching and Presentations... Is wonderful... 👌 😊
@amberap28274 жыл бұрын
Your concepts are so clear its really remarkabke...kudus to you. And thank you for sharing your knowledge and helping us students! ❤
@dr.kantarajtavaneadvocate19064 жыл бұрын
The illustration of 91 (d) implies that oral evidence is not excluded from a verbal contract, which was not required by law to be reduced in writing. All contracts need not be in writing. For example, wedding catering contract & such other.
@dummarodumwaliparty96446 жыл бұрын
U just amazing sir just amazing...... Ur lectures easily understandable by any person I belong to Pakistan and follow ur lecture to get success in exam
@atharvapurohit33122 жыл бұрын
How can you be so intelligent, hat's off to you, ur explanation is like 🙏❤
@anirudhverma17404 жыл бұрын
Pahli bar samjh aaya chapter 6 ....Very nice and helpful
@danishmansoor16045 жыл бұрын
Assalamualaikum bhai. Bahut shukriya aap ka itne useful videos banane ke liye.
@ssshorts20104 жыл бұрын
Thanks..after watching sec92 one can able to understand 91section ...thank u
@raoshahbazali33316 жыл бұрын
Asslamualaikum bhai Aap bahut acche se smjhate ho Bahut bahut Sukriya bhai Apne mujhe bahut kuch sikhaya
@advnaseerbaber43176 жыл бұрын
Bhai aslamaualekum you are superb.... Continue making your vedio.... I am loving it
@TheoryofAbrogation6 жыл бұрын
Walaikumassalam wrwb
@arshjadon87435 жыл бұрын
Sir aap kabhi kuch galat bata hi nahi sakte... Thanku for explaining illustrations...😍😍
@spiiriitual_ninja4 жыл бұрын
Sir Sec 91 bhi bahot achhe se samjh aayi thi.... Thanks...
@taniyabali54394 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir..concept cleared.I luv your videos..its to the point and comprehensive.
@satyendrashrivastava465 жыл бұрын
bahut achha samjhate ho mere dost ..wah maza aa gaya
@alkarsinghrajpoot14806 жыл бұрын
Very nice lecture and thank you very much sir ji
@garg_paras5 жыл бұрын
Bhai lajawab expanation.....mja aarha hai padnai mai
@rajnandanisingh32254 жыл бұрын
Anurag and Ravinder started a business for that they did a contract. All the terms and conditions of contract were written down between the parties. Both the parties were agreeing that if any dispute between them will be decided by arbitrator. Later on a dispute was arises between the parties. Anurag gave the written contract as an evidence that dispute will be decided by the arbitrator only not by the court. Ravinder wants to give the oral evidence that they are not intended that such types of disputes would be decided by arbitrators. Can Ravinder give that oral evidence as per the provision of sec 92 of Indian Evidence Act?
@vijendernehraadvocate10656 жыл бұрын
Great work sir
@pinkisharma19126 жыл бұрын
Sir pls make more videos on sections of evidence act. There are number of important sections that need good explanations.
@adoortolegalknowledge11934 жыл бұрын
Sir my question is the parties or the representativea are bared from giving oral evidence but there is also exceptions....my question is in the exceptions the party will give the oral evidence or only the other parties will give the oral evidence???
@siddharthsingh87135 жыл бұрын
Lotsss of love and respect brotherr
@krisyadav69275 жыл бұрын
Great teaching methods
@azrakhan47356 жыл бұрын
assalam alaikum ......sir bahut clear smjhate ho thnx
@TheoryofAbrogation6 жыл бұрын
Walaikumassalam wrwb
@prithvirajborhade27236 жыл бұрын
very helpful ..thank you sir
@ritsrajsingh44075 жыл бұрын
So can we relate section 99 with section 92- in the order to give the evidence of third party????
@ssshorts20104 жыл бұрын
Aap 91 section me jo illustration d Nd e bole wo section 92ka proviso hai...
@shahidrahman78314 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for helping
@ajeetkrsingh40545 жыл бұрын
You are best lecturer
@somyajain43705 жыл бұрын
Section 92 sirf Esse documents par apply hota hai jo by force of Law written ho toh Esse case mein proviso 4 kaise relevant hoga.. mtlb jab saare hi document proviso 4 ke exception mein fall kar rhe toh oral evidence kab de sakte?
@nirjatidebnath3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this lecture
@govindpandey95506 жыл бұрын
Sir who is third person how they r admissible by oral evidence under sec 92 of evidence act..
@sritidey24635 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation
@deenaarya12694 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir....Nice lecture
@naveennagar43963 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Brother
@ravindarsingh81754 жыл бұрын
Agreement 100 stamp per noterzed ho tab bhi orally cancel kiya ja saktahai
@Pardeepmaan19986 жыл бұрын
which book u prefer sir
@poonamtiwari68903 жыл бұрын
Sir isme illustration kaun kaun se important hai
@theunholyladka67055 жыл бұрын
Arent 91 and 92 a bit different? Like 91 is a bit wider as it includes contract,grant and disposition as well anything reduced into writing whereas s 92 just includes contract,grant and disposition.
@AbhishekThakur-uo6il5 жыл бұрын
Section 91 donot includes anything reduced in writing. For eg. A deed of adoption will not come under section 91.
@theunholyladka67055 жыл бұрын
@@AbhishekThakur-uo6il sorry my bad ! It is any matter required by law to be reduced into writing. And 92 is about contract,grant and disposition.
@theunholyladka67055 жыл бұрын
So s.91 includes unilateral agreement as well whereas s 92 is about just bilateral.
@gauravsharma96835 жыл бұрын
भाई तू कमाल का है इसी तरह हिंदी। मे पढ़ाया कर
@Thakursaahiba095 жыл бұрын
Easy to understand 😊😊
@honeysingh-jd8mp6 жыл бұрын
Bhai ek cheej puchni thi order 11 cpc ka repeal ho gya h kya ?
@missroy73285 жыл бұрын
1 question.."Can evidence of the intention of the parties to a document be given to contradict the express terms of that document?" Pls ans
@TheoryofAbrogation5 жыл бұрын
No
@mudasirfazal6 жыл бұрын
Kindly sort the videos in different playlists in a sequential manner.
@reemagupta23975 жыл бұрын
Very helpful
@mistimondal94953 жыл бұрын
Sir ky ap notes bhi provide karte ho?
@sandipsinhjadav77826 жыл бұрын
good explanation...
@counsel4you4 жыл бұрын
Understood section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act fully.
@oldandnewsongs38054 жыл бұрын
Sir Please upload section 56 and 57
@adv.poojasharma45144 жыл бұрын
Smjh a gya thanku so much sir
@mnabeellatif90145 жыл бұрын
Kindly explain illustration D of 91
@poojaverma52706 жыл бұрын
One scnd guru ji.. 92 m ye bat kehain kehi gyi ki koi 3rd party oral evidence de skti h.. act m to ye by h hi nh... Plz rply
@benazeershaikh66815 жыл бұрын
It's similar to sec 99 dear 3rd party could give oral Evidence