Sedition in India | Sedition Law Explained | Section 124A IPC

[@sushmitadey763]

I'm a student of literature, but your channel is capable of engaging a wide spectrum of audience. 👌

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thanks!

[@swastiksingh3103]

Irony ye hai padhna mujhe Literature tha padh main Law Raha hu 😒

[@ZeenatsCreations]

@@swastiksingh3103 😂😂 no problem law sbko pdha cahiye

[@Deepender99]

@@swastiksingh3103 😅😅

[@lost_in_self4214]

​@@swastiksingh3103what about koi literature karke phir law kre toh👽

[@xoxohehehe9335]

I've my clat paper in 2 hours and here I am learning sedition for the first time 😭😂

[@divyanshisrivastava855]

Kaisa gaya bro😂😂

[@Ishmeetarora1991]

Kaisa hua fir exam?😂

[@roastingkillerpro4638]

Same here bro 😅😅😂😂

[@bablukumar-vk5th]

Clear Hua k nhi be chutiya 😂😂

[@tanujjain7838]

What was ur score

[@rabindranathpal3681]

No. of sedition charges has increased nowadays. It is being misused. Hence it should go for ever like England. Good presentation. Thanks.

[@aditya5371]

No genius. We need to follow the rule set by Kedarnath Judgement in letter and spirit.

[@misbaur8771]

Exactly

[@07mdibaadurrahman6]

@@aditya5371 we already have 21 such provisions and UAPA and arms act apart from 124A and the recent conviction rate is 3.3%, so don't you think it has become obsolete now

[@abhishekshukla7507]

Don't forget that in constitution of india, there is Article 19(2)Reasonable Grounds of Restrictions.Every person is free to Express its views, opinions, beliefs by writing, printing, lithography and by any other means but you cannot do the following: •Don't hurt the sovereignty, security, unity and integrity of India. •don't hurt public order &public peace. •don't do defamation. •don't do incitement of offence. •don't do contempt of court.

[@TheOpposition]

These circumstances are in spirit very loose and open for interpretation, therefore this clause needs a review.

[@abhishekshukla7507]

@@TheOpposition Mentality of a person needed to be modified, not the clause.I hope you able to understand it well.

[@p.bhaskar9933]

@@abhishekshukla7507 I do agree with you

[@babayada2015]

I don't agree with you because these exceptions are open to interpretation and will change meaning as the governments change. Right wing will exploit in their own way and left wing will exploit in their own way.

[@abhishekshukla7507]

@@babayada2015 i wish that the era of this government continues life long forever.

[@rajpatil3835]

I see this video because I read this type of Editorial today. Very great explanation Mam. Thanku Mam

[@sonusabne6632]

Missing priya mam. Aap ne bot aacha explain kiya mam

[@petergeorge2450]

Please add subtitles, so that non hindi people can also get benefited from your amazing content.

[@Youhearditright331]

Inspite of abolishing the law it must be reviewed by a properly set up committee that which sections are to be retained and which may be abolished, abolishing the entire law will create the chances of threat to the integrity and sovereignty of the state; the concept of criticising the ruling party and any political institutions must be removed instantly

[@taniyabali5439]

Very helpful videos ...short and crisp. Keep it up.

[@sujitkumardas5859]

Thank you so much for your valuable support.

[@_FinologyLegal]

You are welcome!

[@ashutoshkumarraja88]

thank you maam for making such complicated topic to understand is very simple manner. 🙏🙏

[@PUNKxPLAYZZ]

BHT ACHE WAY H AAPKA MAM PDANE KA GUD WORK MAM 😍❤

[@________9734]

Thankyou so मच दीदू 🙏🤗🤗

[@areebjamal2261]

Understandable but nobody’s better then Priya Jain Mam in Finology legal🤗

[@MdAman-yn7wt]

Thanks for your service 🙏

[@kushgarg2402]

I am a medical student but still love to learn from you

[@subhmaypatra5562]

Same 😂

[@jatindersingh75042]

Well explained 🙌👍👌👌.... everything clear !! 🔥

[@abhishekshukla7507]

Very well explained.Great step to encourage new talents.

[@msdhoni31]

Very good law for Today time....100% needed this in india

[@009diyarani9]

She is brilliant Explainer 👌👌👌👌🌺🌺🌺🌺

[@rohitsingh-dp3iy]

East or west our mam is the best❣

[@anamikachaturvedi4252]

I am a student of 11 class but still love to listen you... Thanks for your lecture Are they helpful for clat preparation mam??

[@_FinologyLegal]

Yes, it is

[@swatpam]

Wow another matchless video👍

[@kunald5538]

Excellent topic 👍

[@shumailasaifi6466]

Exactly this sec is terribly missusing by gvt any one who is showing disagreement with govt is charging for sediation Or NSA n thankyou for this lecture its really helpful mam

[@animeshpandey7017]

Sedition Law should be more applicable for those political leaders and news media anchors who are able to influence people at large. If an individual common man is saying anything against the government, no public is getting incited, there is no violence, but when same thing is said by any influential political leader or by news channel anchors, it spreads hatred, it spreads violence. So there voice should be controlled.

[@deltastones6702]

💯

[@yagnaprabhakararao9435]

Excellent explanation.

[@ram-oe6zr]

Great going mam 👍 your channel is the best 👍 PLES MAKE VEDIO ON WORLD GEOGRAPHY PHYSICAL FEATURES 🙏🙏🙏 REQUEST

[@ram-oe6zr]

Mam PLES make that vedio

[@dhirajpatel647]

Awesome ,well explained.

[@AdhiyogaSystem]

Very good presentation by this new presenter. Keep it up.

[@gitanjalijena730]

Thanks a lot Mam 🙏 and also thanks your Finology team for nice editting 👍

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thankyou!

[@sakshamdangi9410]

I agree with you. In my opinion, Sedition should become a part of Article 19(2) which aims at imposing reasonable restrictions at the freedom of speech.

[@krishansinghnegi3183]

Very informative. Great video. Keep posting!

[@drpramachoudhary664]

With due respect to this excellent video,Chapter 6 is offences against state , chapter 4 is general exceptions

[@sameer_rajan]

thanku so much mam. 💓 easily samjh me aagya

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you!

[@nehagosavi6980]

Thanks a lot for explaining this one ....👍👏

[@RanjitMallik]

Sec 124A of IPC is not inconsistent with Article 19.1.(a) as it clearly mentioned that mere advocacy or discussion is not subjected to sedition but provoking public to take action against govt of India or public order is subjected to sedition.

[@learner632]

Exactly

[@ojaswiishani372]

But who is going to draw lines between mere advocacy and inciting speech? If anybody who doesn't fall within the line of government is booked for sedition. I am sorry but sec 124 A do curtails freedom of speech and expression.

[@areenbhalekar949]

@@ojaswiishani372 hmm sound sensible

[@amardeep6005]

@@ojaswiishani372 exactly

[@चराग़]

Article 19(2) itself says that freedom of speech and expression is not an absolute freedom and it is subjected to public order...hence problem is not the law problem is its arbitrariness nature in which government used this...hence need is to make a proper guidelines and explicitly put it in words so much that neither integrity of nation is compromise nor the freedom of speech and expression..

[@nishitdeep6419]

good explanation

[@kevalchaudhary4931]

Thank you for your gadiance ❤️

[@David-sq2os]

Very impressive ma'am 👍

[@ঔৣHÐÐŁঔৣ-g6d]

I'm just passing llb.... though I'm watching your videos.its very interesting and also informative video.nd easy to get it.thnk you so much for your efforts and request you to make more videos about CPC.

[@chainsuperstar]

Loved the explanation, minor feedback- "understanding sedition law" can come at the beginning immediately after naming all those people charged with sedition at the start of the video. Flows better that way

[@deepsengupta3619]

Thank u mam....thank u so much. I really appreciate the way every one of you teachers, gurus of law in finolgy making the subject much easy. Thank u mam.

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thanks a lot

[@suvigyadwivedi5071]

We sure need it ,for unity and integrity

[@anjaliaryan2274]

You are doing great mam..keep it up

[@anilsinghchauhan584]

Thanks mam , your videos are very useful. I generally watch your video ,,,,. But Sec 124A ko 1870 me ipc me chap IV me nhi blki chap VI me shamil kiya gya

[@khadar1173]

Well Explained; Oftenly using this Section Now-a-days

[@zeenatulkubra1039]

Great work guys, Keep it up❤️

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thankyou!

[@surajmanikumar3476]

Great work mam ......

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thanks a lot

[@heyitsPrakhar]

Great going 👏 👍

[@ritikakewalramani8770]

Offences against the state provided under chaper VI (6) not under chaper lV (4), chaper IV provide General exceptions

[@SuperMan-eq1pg]

Absolutely it is misused if speaking against the govt is a crime then where goes the fundamental rights? Right to speech!

[@shivanisrivastava1567]

Thank you so much ❤

[@shivalikachauhan9456]

Great explanation can you provide notes for this topic

[@ankitpathak5126]

So why the opposition leaders r not get arrested on the behalf of this law even they criticising the government all the time...

[@aakashsharma7290]

Sedition law should be abolished it challenges the freedom of speech and criticism against government

[@akankshasinghparihar1918]

Sedition law is very must for our nation...but there must be some restrictions in using it...

[@Rajudas-th7si]

Sedition law absolutely needed in india for national security security of the country and national interest

[@sohgaurababhan]

I think sedition law is very important for a country which is so diverse in every aspect.

[@NarenHYD]

May be there is no need to remove 124A, but definitely this law needs few changes so to avoid govt. from misusing it.

[@shreyashsingh9552]

I think it should be banned... Mam nice explanation 👍👍👍

[@Loadingbeauty1209]

Well described.....👍🏻

[@zahreennaaz6677]

Very well done

[@harshdixit3830]

Both achi video ha

[@unfilteredpodcast101]

Which software you guys use for editing may I know !?🤔

[@anjusood8945]

According to me, a middle path should be formed bcz we know that there is lot misuse of sedition law but also on other hand if we remove this section it would harm the national integrity and soverignity of the state...

[@aameyasharma3555]

you took a great topic I must say 😀

[@altamashkareem7990]

I am agree with you sedition hatna nahi chahiyye lekin usme changes aane chahiyye.. Ki koi bhi insaan lawfully protest.. Lawfully speech de sake chahe wo government ke against ho ya kisi or ke ... But agar usme physical activity hui tabhi sedition case lagaae har chiz me nahi...

[@yashjain75]

Definitely, Misuse of this law is more and we should abolish it

[@ayushtiwari5393]

Thanks a lot ma'am for the video...

[@tarifqrs]

Nice explain ma am

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thanks a lot

[@waytodestination5751]

Thanks a lot mam

[@aayushkesharwani5491]

Mam like every coin have two sides the same sedition also comes with a wider misuse. I think we need a law wherein we could grip over these people. You would might have observed that people by criticising the government raising the anti-national slogans or dialogue.

[@rajkumadpallakhe3604]

Mam you are just great

[@Arunkumar-ws6pm]

Please make video on lex loci and lex fori

[@laksh98]

Priya mam's videos were UNBIASED this one was 🧐

[@adv.k.t.chaware5876]

Very good..!

[@Shubhamforall]

Hey, Can we have something like a 2 min video or a blog on FOE: Recent Justice Chandrachud's judgement? Thanks!

[@adv_hitesh96]

Ma'am apka koi application hai play store per

[@hiteykataria8740]

Sedition is requirement in india no need to cancel that from ipc

[@maheshparshotamda3921]

Sedition law is necessary to control as the same time there should be law for counter balance if it is proved in court of justice that police or government has abused than they should pay compensation, so no one nor people nor govt will abuse ,but it is important and necessary no one has right to disorder public peace

[@Prashantcivil]

Please make detail video on 76to 102 ipc with details example

[@satyaswain8428]

Ur channel best in analysis basis. Keep uo ur consistency.

[@anandmithreja4140]

I strongly disagree that 124A should go. If a rule is being misused, the correct way forward is not to repeal the section, but to approach the court for justice and set such precedent that nobody misuses any rule.

[@prabhjotsingh2814]

this is a black law , this should've been scraped by now but this is disturbing to see that despite other country's scrapping of the law , we still have this one in our books & more in practicality . i , also agree that it might be right sometimes to use this law but history is testimony to the fact that govts. worldwide had used this law for their defense only . in my view an amendment should be made to this law adding more peculiar specifications with regard to the crimes

[@khushianu4709]

does any incitement against ruling political party be charged under sedition?

[@IlmiMulhid]

It's very important when we've people like sarjeel imam

[@motive_of_life_]

It should be abolished in India too

[@hrishikesh2817]

Excellent.

[@ManishaSingh-ll1qe]

Ma'am please more videos on IPC

[@lawaspirant4932]

Thanku mam🙏🙏

[@ashishgrm]

Sedition law should hold valid for SC only, because No one is above law. And the expression of common man, is more powerful than Central Government. . Charges of Sedition should only be applied by SC.

[@xxbgamerz1266]

Govt is misusing this law

[@tamilnadu3805]

not misusing this law ia made to miss use

[@VAISHNAVI_01]

The government is misusing this law because even knowing about the sedition law, the traitors are affecting the honor of the government leaders and hurting them through wrong words, quotes, pictures, poems. I Think You will know that there is no other law in our constitution which can punish the traitors.

[@richarana8954]

For the sake of the unity of our country sedition law is important.

[@jeevannews7022]

Hello Finology team I have Questions Need to discuss Let me how can I contact you team📞

[@asheeshbhateja07]

Mam sedition is under ipc chapter 6 not that chapter 4.But in this video taught sedition under chapter 4

[@shubhanshuverma5112]

Misuse to section 376 and 498A ka bhi ho rha h to unhe bhi scrap kar dein?

[@Kunal-jp3um]

Sedition law should be reformed and should be redefined to charge people who only ask for division of India. Not something related to governments

[@tolstoyeducation]

Must abolish

[@ethics444]

Well sedition law indirectly perhaps prohibiting fundamental right and indeed criticism is a fundamental right , Article 19(1)(a) grants freedom of speech but criticism must be within constitutional framework