What Would a Quantum Internet Look Like?

[@Seeker]

Hi Seekers, in our video, we incorrectly say that quantum communication could be faster than the speed of light. What we meant to say was that information about quantum states could be sent across vast distances, potentially faster than the speed of light. Faster than light speed communication is still prohibited. We apologize for this error and are working hard to do better in the future.

[@YouthAmphia]

it’s not that hard to understand, you can’t communicate with the states of entangled particles because they don’t contain information. They’re part of one wave function so they don’t communicate faster than c. Easy isn’t it. If it is for a 14 year old than try harder if it’s too difficult.

[@mrspook21]

Prohibited? Why??

[@Mhdirshadct]

That's fine.

[@andrewalmond9188]

This is why I like your videos, when you make a mistake you admit it and correct it . This is what makes you a reliable source of information to me. Thank you for making wonderful videos keep up the good work!

[@JuanMongeJ-3Dmo]

DarkMeans haven’t seen the video but I think they refer to laws of physic.

[@QuestionEverythingButWHY]

“I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something.” ― Richard P. Feynman

[@ag135i]

.

[@duvallroberts9926]

Knowing the difference between what something is and what something is like in my opinion.

[@fundemort]

@Darth Lame Let me try to understand you. You saying if you have a fat girlfriend, and you need her to be hot (so your pp would be happy), so in your mind you define fat girls as "hot girl". Did i get it right?

[@bravolegacy8673]

@@fundemort must of liked your own comment lol, no harm

[@fundemort]

@@bravolegacy8673 yes but i also got 1 liked did u do it lol

[@gajendrasonare]

Schrondiger: Yes and No Quantum internet: YesNo YesYes NoYes NoNo

[@PalCan]

No Schrodinger is yes and no and both So same

[@puttigandhireddy]

Lol

[@Nulley0]

Yesnt?

[@sushilchaudhary8145]

Maybe

[@15ngayielts47]

YNEOS

[@trey2325]

I feel like at&t would still throttle my speeds to 2 mbps

[@thomasbonse]

So you're saying you'd be on their upgraded plan. 😉

[@touqeermostofa5168]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@livehabesha4642]

😂😂😂

[@rustyshackleford2841]

WeLL ThE TEcHnOLgY....🙄

[@philipmoore449]

Cox will throttle it like that too. And TimeWarner. And all the other big names

[@suncworm]

all i want is 0 lag so i can 360 no scope with ease

[@gianni.santi.]

noob alert. always blaming lag lmao

[@qalbi-s_Ahnfy2095]

@@gianni.santi. Oof

[@ag135i]

.

[@Samantha-jv6xu]

@@gianni.santi. r/woooosh

[@buddyywilsonn]

@@gianni.santi. ping is real

[@ElizabethSwims]

I wonder if quantum entanglement can be used to communicate with submarines under water.

[@ChimpyChamp]

No, it can't, the results need to be compared to make sense.

[@angryjoshi165]

No... Actually, if you can keep the photons entangled you could communicate even (probably) to the inside of an black hole

[@Sol_Invictus_]

According to our current understanding of physics it should be possible

[@Omar-em7rl]

According to our current understanding of physics it shouldn't be possible

[@ChimpyChamp]

@@angryjoshi165 kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZqmsY6KEeshkidk

[@abhijiths5237]

1:49 you cannot send information faster than the speed of light. From what i have learnt entanglement doesn't allow meaningful information to be transferred FTL.

[@owiela]

But if you have a tangled particle, and change it's state, detecting that state change IS sending information. Even if you cannot detect it's state exactly, just knowing it changed can be cleverly converted into binary... or something (I don't really know what I'm talking about... just my 2 cents) :]

[@robingarvin-mack]

You are absolutely 100% correct. This is why I take issue with the term _'(Faster) Download Speeds'_ in relation to different sized Internet bandwidth packages. 'Faster' is a fallacy. *_R_* 😎

[@abhijiths5237]

@@owiela The thing is that we wouldn't know what the first particle's spin would be when we observe it and the second particle would have opposite spin of the first. So it is just random and no meaningful information could be transferred.

[@owiela]

@@abhijiths5237 Would observing the same particle twice give different results?... If so, if lets say the particle shows a "1", and you change the state, will the state be anything but "1", or will it be random, including the state you just observed? I have so many questions. Maybe I should just conduct some research myself :p

[@abhijiths5237]

@@owiela its completely random. An example is that a photon has a 50% chance to go through a polarizer so when you repeat the experiment it still has a 50% chance. For more information you would need to reserch by yourself :)

[@Kabodanki]

Will smith know a lot about "Entanglement"

[@TalkinKush]

This meme is in superposition

[@anandsuralkar2947]

Yuhhh dats hat dats haat

[@Baddawg_313]

@@anandsuralkar2947 have you ever used the word "superposition"? Am i dumb? Is that why my dad left me and my mom?

[@anatine_banana_69]

I simultaneously both understand and don't understand this joke

[@HongNguyen-pd5tl]

noliNagirlasia.link

[@LiquidSoapDrinker]

Who would win: The entirety of the internet via cables 1 snippy boi ✂️

[@Borderlands808]

Some hacker gonna make a program called “Detanglement” to brake this.

[@cataclysmicat9551]

what

[@touqeermostofa5168]

Exactly what I was thinking about. Like, dude there's literally masterminds out there who may invent anti-quantum decryption and then... You get the idea

[@puttigandhireddy]

Lol

[@Pixeleyes00]

Mfs really think hackers can do anything. Even if they were an astrophysicist quantum superposition isn't exactly gully understood, so unless you know God and he also has a sick ass rig I think it will be a long time before some basement dweller cracks the code to the universe and reverses entropy just to get access to some kid's mom's credit card.

[@Borderlands808]

@@Pixeleyes00 if it's man made it can be UN-made.

[@Chidulo]

Download: 0.99% or 99% until your download is complete Time: 20 years or 2 seconds remaining. Please be patient or not. Please open the file to find out.

[@winstonsmith430]

I theorized about using entangled pairs to make a communications array around 1999 after reading several books on quantum physics and books on entanglement. Since I'm a nobody and never went to college It was literally just an idea in my head until now. Pretty awesome somebody's actually working on it. It will be nice when manufacturers figure out how to embed these Quantum arrays into computer processors. Then all you would have to do is deploy matching entangled pairs of systems to whatever location we would like.

[@marleneamascual7728]

You sir have an interesting mind

[@flemlion13]

"Possibly faster than the speed of light " ??? Where did they get that from?? Scientific consensus is still that no information can be sent faster than the speed of light even with spooky action at a distance

[@tomarty2103]

I always get confused when reputable science sources get "FTL communication" out of quantum entanglement research. If you can't set the state of an entangled particle by observing it, you can't communicate faster than light. Two observers being guaranteed the same result isn't true "spooky action at a distance".

[@hjk3927]

Until otherwise proven, I will asume, that they do not understand themself, what they are talking about. Hope this is a one time blooper :{

[@evertchin]

i've lost all my respect for this channel when i know the hosts pretty much know less than i do... they pretty much just read off the scripts with zero understandings of what they are reading.

[@Nawmps]

The news that they report on is interesting, even if the conclusions they might draw are both unnecessary and even harmful to educating the layman.

[@winstonsmith430]

Maybe we should just ask that Tyson guy? I would try to explain it but nobody would believe me anyway oh, you know entanglement that thing and Einstein called spooky action at a distance. Which wasn't really spooky at all. Maybe we should call it magic and call it a night?

[@alexielouisl.8462]

"Quantum Internet" or in other words: "Chiral Network"

[@michaelazarov2065]

I'll be waiting for you.. on the beach

[@TheStRyder91]

@@michaelazarov2065 Beach... Please 🙄

[@consciouscode8150]

Funny enough, there's a good chance they're using spin/handedness/"chirality" as the entangled property, so literally a chiral network

[@ashekhar1]

I need chiral crystals

[@bakagomi9284]

seeker : metion Qubits me : ah shit here we go again

[@heyugys]

I could see digital currency exchanges being hosted on the quantum net to give a impenetrable layer of security to any transfers. This would give literally everyone a great use case for it.

[@potatomatop9326]

Imagine having a quantum internet just to play raid shadow legends and watch hub

[@ulysessoliverasponyman]

Is not with the hub

[@ag135i]

(Edited)

[@buddyywilsonn]

Or minecraft

[@liquidbraino]

You spelled Porn Hub wrong.

[@SirusStarTV]

Well, everyone has their own interests..

[@TrangleC]

Last time I heard a real scientist talk about this, he said you can not use Quantum Entanglement to transfer information faster than the speed of light. I don't remember the details why, but I remember he said that what we call "the Speed of Light" should actually rather be called "Maximum Speed of Information". It isn't actually a property of light to move specifically that fast, apparently, it is a limitation of Space-Time itself somehow and light just can't move faster because nothing can move faster, not even entangled information. It has something to do with how wave-form and particle-form collapse when you measure them, or something. edit: I found an article explaining it, but I think KZbin doesn't allow me to post links in comments, so if you are interested, you need to google it yourself. Sorry. It isn't hard to find though.

[@freerideziege6047]

I think I know what you mean with the definition of the speed of light. I heard of it as the "speed of causality". Transfering information FTL should result in receving the message in the past. There is so many YT-videos about this topk out there. Can you give me a hint or a link to find what you were talking about? I believe you can post links in here since i saw a spam-posts above with links.

[@mraaronhd]

Video: “Here’s what we know!” Me: “still ain’t coming to my area...”

[@theobserver9131]

I'm fascinated with quantum internet and all the other quantum possibilities, but the questions demanding my attention atm are; How do you entangle particles? How do you transport entangled particles to their useful destinations? How long are the entangled particles useful? What do you keep entangled particles in? What kind of particles are the most useful for this purpose?

[@kuuhakucs8316]

"Do you have WiFi here" "Yesn't"

[@browerkyle]

I've noticed being distracted by your teleprompter reading in a few episodes. If you have enough room, Julian, try moving the camera/prompter further away or using a small text/limit the screen width. Great content as always!

[@ianlong9283]

guys plz move further away from the camera. your script reading is so distracting xD love the vid tho

[@y0uCantHandle]

Damn it, now I can’t unsee this

[@ag135i]

.

[@phoule76]

he's surely using his home web cam, so we'll take what we can get.

[@Vlican]

That's the next step. I'm glad he's improved his audio quality. Some of his previous videos had horrendous vocal that would sound like every word was being cut out.

[@shufukillah6772]

Yeah, it's been bother me for a while now

[@OmegaWolf747]

When/If the quantum Internet gets fully set up, will it be used primarily for secure communication separate from the classical Internet, or would it be used to further secure the classical Internet?

[@NoosaHeads]

I have always thought about an electron entangled (or gravitational wave) method of communication. Instant (as opposed to very fast), 100% secure (in the case of electron entanglement but not gravitational waves) and unlimited (in the case of gravitational waves but not electron entanglement). However, I'm not sure whether our dysfunctional species is ready for such technology. We don't put sophisticated equipment in the hands of infants, therefore we shouldn't put unlimited computing and communication power in the hands of ordinary humans.

[@KanedaSyndrome]

Just a clarification - communication won't truly be faster than light, and then again, perhaps. If you can store the entangled pair, which was sent out previously, and then draw on that for critical Faster-Than-Light use to send data, then perhaps. But initially the entangled particles will have to travel from A to B at the max speed of light. How would you then communicate via entanglement? Let's imagine that someone on Earth wants to send data to someone on one of Jupiter's moons. Earth has photon A which is entangled with photon B, and photon B is at a Jupiter moon. To then send bits of information, we could do an experiment that sends photon B in two different directions in a light-circuit based on whether it's in a superposition or not. Once the person on Earth measures, and thus collapses the wave equation of photon A, immediately photon B's wave equation is collapsed as well, and it will switch from being in a superposition to a standard state. When this happens photon B will switch direction in the light-circuit and the person on the Jupiter's moon will be able to interpret this as a bit. Granted there's more to it, when is the resolved state a 0 or a 1? That's probably doable, and besides the core mechanics of this thought experiment. You could then kinda fill up the quantum communication gas, so to say, with a steady stream of entangled particles, which would arrive at light speed to the destination, so that's about 43 minutes from Earth to Jupiter. You then spend these entangled particles for instant communication, sorta like a mobile phone's data plan. Let me know if I'm completely off base here. This is how I am thinking this could become something practical. Communication at Faster-Than-Light speed, without really being it at all. Rather - pre-emptive communication.

[@quarkmarino]

I've imagined quantum internet in such a way that you purchase a container like those CO2 canisters, but with quantum entangled particles with particles in the data centers, and you comunicate instantly by changing the particles in your end, and sending messages FTL( I know you cant send actual information faster than light, but this is where the "Imaginary" part takes place), then you purchase a quota accordint to the amount of particles the canister contains(I know too, that the amount of particles would be huge, but imagen the type of and amount of information you might like to send, and that could be instant comunication among vast distances) pair it with warp tech, and SW instant hologram comunications doesnt look too far fetched

[@JolanRensen]

Hold up, while you can send entangled photons to create a super secure quantum Internet, it's not possible to send new information without a wire to another place instantaneously. That would mean faster than light information distribution which is impossible. So no faster than light internet, but a super secure one.

[@AndriiPovkh]

If two photons are entangled and you change the state of one, the second one changes its state too, but is the entanglement broken after that or every time you change one photon another one will change too and you can repeat it indefinitely?

[@CubbyTech]

As someone who builds the Internet, I'm curious which frequency quantum bits are entangled at? Most current fiber optic communication happens around 1310nm with longer-reach wavelengths around 1550nm.

[@JackSparrow-nq5wh]

Starlink is the backbone of the Quantum Internet. You'll realize soon

[@cristobalcardenas2418]

Faster than light communication it’s not possible with entanglement, this is because you still need to know the state of the system (eg; has the spin of the other particle changed as well?). This still requires information to be shared by means slower than light to be able to determine that a bit of information was send...

[@johnphantom]

I came up with a model for a new type of computer from playing a game, Counter-Strike (a Half-Life mod) when it was in its original beta phase. The system was very poorly designed, like the accuracy system for the weapons was designed that if you slow down to a walk, your guns were more accurate, but they set the parameters up so that it triggered this extra accuracy just going the slightest speed under a full run. Using +moveup which was meant for swimming in the scripting language, which is the only "language" I used, you could get half way between a run and a walk for movement speed and get the accuracy of a walk and the silence of it, with movement sound being another similar flaw they made in the game. That combined with scripting firing of the gun so it briefly made you do +moveup before actually firing the gun and turning it off immediately after firing the gun effectively gave you a more accurate gun at a running speed. There were many holes in the original CS system, I repeatedly told them about them on their message board, getting repeatedly banned. I remind you: I only used the extremely simplistic scripting language built into the game, so I was exploiting and not cheating, even though in effect it was cheating. CS 1.6 should have been CS 2.0 because they made major changes to the engine due to what I was spreading around. At least one of the hacks that I kept to myself and did not put into my script still exist in the current CS system as far as I know. It was basic to the Quakeworld original engine Half-Life is based on. The script that is part of my work, for CS 1.6, has a fully automated taunt system for giving people a hard time. I built a randomizer and relational database that sometimes spits out a taunt based on the weapon or weapon type you are using just before your gun is actually fired when you fire, only using the one command, alias. Alias just lets you create or reassign a command to an indicated string of commands, and nothing else. We are not digital and nothing in Nature is digital. Digital computers are an exact science with exact results. Nature is based on "good enough is good enough". Oxford quantum physics professor Andrew Steane wrote in his paper about quantum information systems titled "Quantum computing" at arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9708022.pdf : "The new version of the Church-Turing thesis (now called the ‘Church-Turing Principle’) does not refer to Turing machines. This is important because there are fundamental differences between the very nature of the Turing machine and the principles of quantum mechanics. One is described in terms of operations on classical bits, the other in terms of evolution of quantum states. Hence there is the possibility that the universal Turing machine, and hence all classical computers, might not be able to simulate some of the behavior to be found in Nature. Conversely, it may be physically possible (i.e. not ruled out by the laws of Nature) to realize a new type of computation essentially different from that of classical computer science. This is the central aim of quantum computing." From what I understand they are forcing current quantum computers to unnaturally apply a binary state to something that has an infinite evolution of states. Think of the electron and the circle it makes around a nucleus. That 360 degrees circle it makes is infinite in precision, and that movement certainly has an effect on its surroundings. Basically, practical math is the descriptive language of the universe, and not the actual universe because it uses measurements. I propose a "Dynamic Stateless Computer" that operates on "Logic Geometry" based only on connections, or links, or pointers - a much more simple computer than the three basic Boolean logic gates operating on mathematical binary bits that is every computer out there. The shape is the logic and the logic is the shape, sort of like a truth table that is dynamic where the "truths" change as it runs. Quantum mechanics is beyond me, but if this only needs connections, ie a quantum entanglement (short video on entanglement: kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGKqdKGvmMeAm6M ), can we build a computer that operates and does its entire run instantly? Like I said, all I need is connections to perform logic... no need for information... the shape is the logic. You are best off going to Github and seeing online without downloading the paper and models. When someone looked at my calculators, they accused me of: "You're not doing math! You're emulating math!" Look at the simple calculator first, it only does addition and subtraction. Then look at the complex calculator that does multiplication and division. As you well know, if I can do those things, I can do anything mathematically. In the main model I created if-thens, complex do-whiles, a randomizer and a relational database. github.com/johnphantom/Dynamic-Stateless-Computer Through the exercise of the most complex do-while I asked a question related to that, and the answer uses the ancient Chinese/Pascal's Triangle (which millions have looked at over thousands of years) in a new way: mathhelpforum.com/threads/combination-lock.17147/ I basically had to count nothing as something to count, as in you can have different items to count the permutations of but a default state of no item is possible for each, some or all to count in the permutations, and it doesn't seem anyone else in history was able to use the really basic mathematical concept of the Triangle in that way for the solution. It is similar to how hats can be arranged on pegs question of how many permutations you can have that is commonly associated with Pascal's Triangle, but they did not count the empty pegs as part of the permutations that they can have. The technique of the implementation is a little interesting, with it being able to reach any of the 209 possible permutations of 4 wheels with 4 numbers (don't know if I should count 0, it is special in this case - if you do count 0, it is 5 numbers) in 4 keystrokes or less - it's how it scales that is the curiosity, where if I had 18 slots and 18 items to form a permutation it would have almost 3x10 to the 18th power or 2,968,971,264,021,448,999 possible permutations, each reachable within 18 keystrokes or less. I don't have any idea as to how this would be physically built - none of the aspects of it, except for the dynamic logic that I also do not have any clue if it really is what I ask above. I just can do these things I demonstrate and in my extensive almost 50 years of digital computer experience I have not seen anything exactly like it. Maybe you wonder about my computer experience? I have always been fascinated by computers, starting in 1972 using a prototype Cogar 4 that my dad got his hands on, when I was 3. By the time I was 5, Singer wanted to use me in a commercial to sell the computer, because if a 5 yo could start it, load the OS and then load games, that proved anyone could. My first mentor helped develop Ethernet after working for my father, and allowed me to hold one of the first breadboard ethernet cards developed when I was 10. My first real program (programming since at least 5 if you count the Cogar ASM I had to type to get to the OS and games) was in BASIC when I was 11 that I learned from a manual without anything more than a small example for each command, written with pencil on paper; a rudimentary AI demonstration called "Animals". Second program I made I had another computer (we had moved and left the one at my dads company behind when he sold it) and was a dot bouncing around the screen. Third program, with a 12 year old's understanding of math, I attempted to do 3D. I first professionally programmed in 1982, started building computers and networks for a small computer company in 1986 owned by my second mentor, Peter De Blanc who lead ICANN for a period, was an official beta tester and developer for OS/2 2.0 and developed a device driver for it for the extremely complex Truevision Targa+ 64 video editing board (pic: imgur.com/a/hMe21Qe ) directly flipping bits on it in 1991. The code for the model for the dynamic stateless computer is about 640 lines and took me 6 months to complete, with the code for the Targa+ device driver being over 4200 lines and took me one 20 hour sitting that compiled and ran the first time that I have 3 witnesses for. That's almost 30 years ago. My experience has only gone up from there. This dynamic logic is something I found, that I have never seen anything like even searching for it on the Internet for the past 20 years. I think this is basic to everything and is a new science, as it only operates on one concept - connections. Lastly, I did not set out to do this, it just happened. I originally wanted a script to quickly buy weapons, and it developed from there. I have kept every beta and final released versions of the script from beginning to end, to show how it developed. I am looking for help explaining this and turning the old Counter-Strike 1.6 script into a package for Counter-Strike:Global Offensive, the latest version. I am not talking about converting the code, it works - I just need help with the current packaging for CS:GO. Any input would be great, thank you. [e-mail]

[@evertchin]

lol what did you smoke...

[@AnonymousFreakYT]

Minor quibble (no quantum joke intended) - merely using "quantum" internet doesn't inherently make eavesdropping significantly harder. Sure, it will take different technology than the regular internet, but by the time "quantum internet" is deployed, I'm sure the tools will be available. It just makes _detecting_ eavesdropping trivial. Quantum entangled pairs, on the other hand, make eavesdropping significantly harder, requiring a much more sophisticated attack involving "man in the middle" and impersonation. Again, not impossible - there are tools to do it with conventional internet right now, and being quantum doesn't inherently change the nature of the attack, just the tools necessary. It removes "passive" interception as a possibility, but active is still very much possible. (Although I imagine from my knowledge of cryptography and quantum mechanics that there are a few possible ways to secure against even active interception.)

[@livingcorpse5664]

The fact we have been working on something for a decade but still have a hard time defining it tells me we are currently at a point where our reach extends past our grasp. For now, at least.

[@neilruedlinger4851]

Or perhaps Applied Physicists/Engineers are too busy in making the Quantum Tech work reliably and when it does, meet with Patent Lawyers, for them to get together in a Symposium to select a panel that can define it? The patents are worth billion$.

[@kevinratay8285]

Seeker has to have the best graphics I've ever seen. I don't even listen to their hosts

[@jarrenm4760]

The internet started as a service just for military, schools, governments, and financial institutions. Now it has become what we all know and love today. we'll probably get mass quantum internet access like we do today within 20-30 years.

[@heretustay]

These are really well researched and presented videos, but does anyone else just watch his eyes dart back and forth as he's reading the script?

[@TheBaconVanMan]

You could just have a router that entangles photons, then blasts one of the pair where it needs to be (you know, x however many are needed to transmit large amounts of code), then once you've created that link, start sending instant data via the entanglement. Original connection could be made similar to how it is now with a few milliseconds of ping, then all following info would be instant. Finally! A way to play music with my friends over video chat without the debilitating lag that currently makes it impossible, even at the speed of light.

[@oplkfdhgk]

i never thought that 24 fps video could look laggy but you proved me wrong :D

[@chinmaykrishna6485]

Correction: Although entangled states are "collapsed" (if you will to follow the standard Copenhagen interpretation) instantaneously (faster than light), there is no way you can transmit information faster than light. Entangled particle have the same "wave-function," and so the state of one depends on the other. But by no way is FTL communication possible at this point.

[@srib818]

you guys should start a monthly publication called 'seeker's digest' .

[@jacobandrews2663]

Bro, what kinds question is that? "Are you excited for the quantum internet"... Like, Who wouldn't be? That's the coolest thing I've heard all week

[@benjaminlehman3221]

I’ve thought about this a few times. I’m glad there is a video about it.

[@tomharari3092]

How tf each video u upload better than the one before it

[@Rasorblades]

You have gotten reaaaallly good at reading the script to us lolololol

[@WWeronko]

I have heard for decades that you can’t make a copy of a quantum system without knowing the state of the quantum system. This is known as the no-cloning theorem and it means entangled systems can’t transmit messages faster than light. Has something changed?

[@meneeRubieko]

The fact that he says “ you’re probably gonna use light through fiber optic cables to watch your cat video’s” made me realize that explaining this sentence to somebody 100 years ago would be impossible and that we’re living in a magic age

[@DomyanAlhaj]

Quantum physicists in Zagreb help discover Quantum Internet network In addition to Croatian scientists, the international research team consisted of scientists from the University of Bristol (United Kingdom) and the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

[@jonasholzer4422]

What I still don't get about quantum computing is, how the possibility of being 1, 0 or both at the same time is useful. I just can't imagine how you can create useful information out of particles that switch back and forth between their states. Or am I completely misunderstanding this?

[@deathstalkr_]

Why isn't anybody talking about that cool Bugatti Chiron model in the background?

[@MylesDavid]

Brother, you’ve got to narrow your teleprompter image! It looks like you’re reading very wide left to right to left to right and so forth! As opposed to looking you’re looking at the viewer. It also feels like the prompter screen is too close to your face maybe? Otherwise great job!! 👍🏼

[@ThexBorg]

A report a couple of years ago stated that the NSA had a functioning quantum network for around 2 years at the time.

[@RRW359]

Could we use this to communicate with other planets? Say we sent someone to Mars with an entangled particle. I ask this not only because it would be helpful to us, but one of the flaws with the Fermi paradox is that it assumes aliens use radio to communicate with other planets. If quantum communication is possible than I 100% guarantee that it's more practical than radio when communicating over several lightyears, and it would be undetectable to us.

[@tendus2465]

Quantum mechanics obeys the no-signaling principle. Even though measurements performed on entangled states can lead to phenomenons like "Bell nonlocality" or "Steering" it can not be used to transfer information faster than what is allowed by relativity.

[@hans-henrikstrfeldt7854]

Your initial description of entanglement is likely to give rise to a lot of misunderstandings.

[@starcitizen-ulysses-31-25]

I always imagined an entangled network between earth and a remote-controlled device like a rover or UAV on Mars, or any other remote celestial body. Real-time video feed from Mars would be AMAZING!

[@xand2870]

They've called the president from the moon decades ago with instant connection

[@rayhaanbhikha9094]

Can see this new form of internet being used for interplanetary communication. Two entangled photons communicating.

[@davidrooks1846]

I’ll be more excited when I finally get to meet the terminator

[@garettmcafee6139]

Imagine having a huge quantum hub that acts as the with entangled photons that's are entangled with specific areas in a galactic that allowed galactic internet

[@jordanworm6923]

Wait, so question. I read an article that theorized about the ability to have two chips of quantum entangled qubits. One chip inside a device (like a laptop, phone, or whatever) and then a chip at some kind of server farm. These chips would be used to communicate between all services instead of wires in the future. The biggest vulnerability was the physical devices themselves. Is this just really far off?

[@Leandro_SWR]

Entanglement is so good, imagine being able to communicate in real-time with humans on Mars in the future.

[@liquidbraino]

Entanglement is so good all it needs is Spaghetti sauce.

[@evertchin]

except you cant pick what to store in the entangled protons.... which mean you cant use it as communication medium.

[@Leandro_SWR]

@@evertchin ? What does storing data have to do with transmitting it? You're using entanglement just to transmit the data as (1, 0, 1-0) not to store it.

[@evertchin]

@@Leandro_SWR what i meant by storing is you cant manipulate the spins artificially... hence you cant transmit/encode any spins/bits as you wished. hence you cant exploit the phenomenal to transmit information. search for faster than light communication in wikipedia for details.

[@gerbenrampaart8042]

Wait, you can't actually sent data faster than light using entanglement. Please don't imply it can.

[@CassandraPantaristi]

Nothing except space itself can travel faster than light.

[@plutopingvin454]

The Goth Indo-European Space isn’t nothing tho... It’s mostly dark matter and energy. So I’m pretty sure things can travel faster than the speed of light.

[@CassandraPantaristi]

@@plutopingvin454 Oh I know space isn't nothing. What I meant is that nothing within space can go faster than the speed of light.

[@plutopingvin454]

@@CassandraPantaristi Well if you would be able to ´´surf the waves´´ of the universe you would reach the same speed as the expansion.

[@CassandraPantaristi]

@@plutopingvin454 Yeah, that would be interesting.

[@qasaqlegendary]

There are so many planets in space, there are so many of them that immortal humanity seems destined for all this. I admit such a mind blowing thought

[@mafurock33]

I thought long distance communication through quantum entanglement has been show to be impossible/paradoxical.....?

[@johnadriandodge]

Shalom evening fellow seekers. This is deep and quite a sophisticated form of technological science, which certainly has matured by leaps and bounds!

[@bxdanny]

You cannot actually transmit intelligible information using quantum entanglement. It will always look like random noise until it is compared with other information sent by more normal (lightspeed or slower) methods.

[@bryand3576]

Nice video, but there is a gigantic mistake in it: It is physically impossible to propagate information faster than the speed of light, even if entanglement is involved. It is actually at the very basis of the special theory of relativity. Indeed, despite the instantaneous collapse of the entangled pairs, the measurement process in itself is random. Entanglement only means that if you measure the left state to be say 0, you know that the other state will be 1, and this knowledge cannot be used to convey information.

[@andreask.2675]

As far as I understand, it is not possible to transmit information via entangled particles. Hence, no faster than light communication.

[@jane-nessa24]

Non-technical person here... still unclear. What would change from what we have now? What are some examples?

[@jorge-lp2xi]

If two entangled particles are separated, one of them remains static on the surface of the earth, the other goes to space in a rocket that reaches 99% of the speed of light. How would relativity affect this entanglement if one were to intend to use it as a communication device?

[@rajeshchaudhary883]

It so satisfying to see the host's pupils moving left to right when he speaks.

[@manolingz]

spooky action at a distance is just in time for the halloween.

[@thundercaaat]

FASTER than the speed of light?! Does that mean every communication will go back in time? Will we have another "Paul is dead" situation on our hands??? Makes earballs hurt

[@Anton-cv2ti]

Nope, it'll just be instantaneous

[@EshanTahir]

bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/what-travels-faster-than-the-speed-of-light

[@firelow]

is that part saying that quantum entanglement can transmit data actually right? it goes against everything i heard from non fiction sources "when one changes the other changes too"

[@mishaerementchouk]

No. The whole video is full of fantasies. Quantum internet, in order to be of any benefit, is the internet for quantum information processing devices. For classical data, it cannot outperform classical internet in principle.

[@buggerlugz6753]

Why do you need to use any cables to transmit quantum data? You can have two "buckets" of linked entangled photons at different locations across the globe and transmit data between each site by "just" manipulating the photons at each site independently.

[@hr2079]

Very educational. Thank you for sharing

[@vicky7100]

@seeker Jus a small correction at 1:52 nothing in known /explored universe is faster than light 😁 or may be... jus may be u have uploaded this video using Quantum internet in parallel-intersected i.e superimposed- entangled universe !!

[@Scleavers]

This sounds exciting. IoT will have to adopt, even carry a new name

[@Revadike]

Would this quantum communication solve communication delays for space travel?

[@evertchin]

it wont... we still haven't discover any way to transmit information with no delay yet. you cant manipulate quantum entanglement to transmit data with no delay.

[@mixey01]

A Quantum Internet.. A Skynet 🥴

[@shivek1987]

THAT BROKEN BUGGATI CHIRON DISTRACTS

[@doyoumind7932]

So we're 50 to 100 years from something even remotely close to the regular internet. Gotcha.

[@maharlika9809]

Damn, future gamers would be lucky to experience this Quantum Era

[@CassandraPantaristi]

No, they have to experience the early days of when online gaming sucked to know how easy they're going to have it.

[@Jeevaji14]

Yes zero ping

[@kylebear5852]

What about decoherence? How can the photons travel through the fiber optics entangled?

[@pickin7654]

Man, the quantum internet videos would be simultaneously both adult and family friendly.

[@stefanmohammed45]

🤔

[@DavidWTube]

I wish every video on quantum computing didn't have to start with explaining how quantum computing works... its pretty much common knowledge at this point. Try "If you want to know how Quantum Computing works click the link in the description.".

[@deisisase]

This loop seems like the first E-mails in the 1970s. They could only send one letter at a time and the system was very prone to crashing.

[@an_old_tree8829]

Is there something like Quantum Gaming ? It would be much interesting

[@CassandraPantaristi]

Imagine video game consoles with quantum internet. "The PlayStation 10 with quantum internet capability, the ultimate cutting-edge of quantum computing technology!

[@sorairosetsuna0989]

Quantum Gamers would experience: being Lag and not lag at the same time having a High and low fps at the same time Winning and losing at the same time being a Pro and noob at the same time

[@tomarty2103]

Is there any evidence that "spooky action at a distance" can be manipulated for communication? If FTL communication was possible, what effect would relativity and time dilation have? Let's say I want to watch live earth TV while falling into a black hole.

[@gamingcreatesworlddd2425]

It shut my brain down well ftl time dilation is only good if you can leave your timeline go to the future if you want to be in present warp drive is the only way

[@ag135i]

Quantum computing is also prone to EMP.

[@afox5319]

Every electric device not shielded against em radiation is prone to emp. A solar flare will destroy almost all household devices and damage a large part of our infrastructure. Only military installations and power plants (in some cases) have any form of em shielding

[@nonyabiz9340]

Quantum computing is so sensitive it's prone to go down if a tech farts near the machine.

[@MrMarkTheBeastMemes99]

Once upon a time there was a theory, an explanation if you'd like to say, that said "To Be Or Not To Be" And now it's a bit different To Be Or Not To Be Be To Or Not Be To Be Be Or Not Be Be Not Not Or Not Not Not

[@renegarza9]

Could we potentially set up real time communication between earth and Mars with entanglement?

[@alexandercuozzo6048]

Quantum entanglement cannot be used to communicate faster than the speed of light. When you collapse the state of your qubit, my entangled qubit collapses as well, but I cannot KNOW that it has collapsed. Faster than light communication would violate causality. It's certainly action at a distance (which is very strange), but it is physically impossible to use entanglement to communicate faster than light.

[@phatkitkat6716]

nice video however i do not advise to explain such phenomena through descriptions which are only perceivable knowing the full EM spectrum, as for example you don't send billions of little photons through a wire...quantum is based on our "current understanding of light" in that case light it is a transverse EM coaxial circuit with pulse perturbations..i.e the photon

[@DaBlondDude]

How would eavesdropping be detected ? Normally that would take shared info at both ends, wouldn't it?

[@RossemaryBonifacio2028]

Question. So if the quantum internet would be faster than the speed of light. Can we sort of use that law to travel in time?

[@digvidguy]

Julian, you're my favorite Seeker host!

[@yaelschlichting9601]

It will look like many many errors and lots of focus on error correction, which will also be erroneous and it will look like we'll waste a lot of energy for that, because of the cooling issues we'll end up with .

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Bigger and better Cat videos for sure