Seerah of Prophet Muhammed 44 - Assassination of Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf - Yasir Qadhi | 12th Dec 2012

Shaykh Yasir Qadhi gives a detailed analysis of the life of Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him) from the original sources.
Title: Events between Battle of Badr & Battle of Uhud - Part 2
Study the biography of the single greatest human being that ever walked the surface of this earth, whom Allah sent as a Mercy to Mankind.
This lecture was recorded on 12th December, 2012

[@didagodana2541]

You are my genius! May Allah grant you Jannah.

[@sameerarahman1809]

ameen

[@amigerman1986]

He is not dead yet... pray for blessing of Allah on him.... ameen

[@notact4102]

@@amigerman1986 we can still ask for jannah for someone while they're alive because that's the ultimate goal for all of us. So may Allah grant Sheikh Yasir Qadhi jannatul firdaus. Ameen

[@Lula2020]

Mashaallah May Allah almighty make us among those ones who accompany our beloved prophet saw in Jannah❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@abubakr8232]

Episode 43 - Episode 45 Notes: (Ill Repost this on EP 45) Events between Battle of Badr and Battle of Uhud The Invasion & Expulsion of Banu Qaynuqa This occurred 3 weeks after the Battle of Badr, the largest Yahud tribe in Medina called the Banu Qaynuqa began expressing their anger at the Quraysh’s defeat at Badr. This led up to an exchange where a Muslim man was killed by the Yahud, for killing a Yaudi man, who disrespected the honour of a Muslim woman. The Prophet SAW then announced that the treaty of Medina had been broken and that the Banu Qaynuqa no longer has a treaty with the Muslims. After which, the Prophet SAW and the Muslims immediately began marching upon the Banu Qaynuqa. The Banu Qaynuqa lived in fortresses outside Medina and they planned to stay locked up in there. However, the Prophet SAW ordered the Muslims to surround the fortress and let the Banu Qaynuqa supplies run out and after 15 days they surrendered unconditionally. The Banu Qaynuqa were then taken prisoner and they asked Abdullah Ibn Ubayy ibn Salul, to help them out and the Prophet SAW exiled them after his insistence. But in doing so they left a lot of booty that the Muslims gained. After this, the Qaynuqa fled to Khaybar. The Invasion of Al Kudr Two months after Badr, an unhappy Arabian tribe, called the Banu Salim, planned to attack Medina but were confronted by the Muslims and fled. They wanted to attack because the Muslims winning the Battle of Badr meant that they lost out on business. The Sariyya of Sawiq Two months after Badr, Abu Sufyan gather 200 men and attempted to get revenge on the Muslims were winning at Badr. The Banu Nadir tribe helped Abu Sufyan get into Medina and he then attacked and killed two Muslim men. The Prophet SAW and the Muslims chased him but were unsuccessful in capturing him. The Sariyya of Al Qarada This occurred in the 3AH and was the precursor for the Battle of Uhud. The Quraysh attempted to send their usual caravan to Syria for trade and took a secret route. The Prophet SAW got intelligence of this and sent Zayd Ibn Haritha RA who along with other 99 other Muslims successfully captured the caravan. They brought it back to Medina and the loot was shared. The capture of this caravan hit the Quraysh hard. The Assassination of Ka’b Ibn Al-Ashraf Ka’b Ibn Al Ashraf was a wealthy handsome Jew of Medina who had allied with the Quraysh and was always mocking the Prophet SAW and Islam. He wrote poems that insulted the Prophet SAW and even wrote erotic poems about Muslim women by name. This led to the Prophet SAW ordering his assassination and he was killed by Muhammad Ibn Maslamah RA. After Ka’bs death the Jewish tribes complained, but the Prophet SAW ignored them due to their past transgressions. ========================================================== Disclaimer for my Notes of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi’s Seerah of the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Series: Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh, these are my notes on Sheikh Yasir Qadhi’s Seerah series. Please note: I HIGHLY recommend that you all watch YQ’s Seerah series, as I DON’T cover every single detail the Sheikh mentions. I made these notes primarily for myself but, decided my fellow brothers and sisters may benefit from them too. I no doubt will have made mistakes in my notes. All the good in these notes is from Allah SWT and all the mistakes are from myself. But, I was very meticulous and tried my best to make sure everything is accurate as the Sheikh mentions it. You also will see I have added “Fun Trivia facts” under each of my notes. These FTFs are information YQ said that was off topic or not necessary to include in my notes for the episode. But, they were still worth mentioning hence the inclusion as FTFs. FTFs aren’t always HAPPY pieces of information. Sometimes they are very sad trivia. I just want to say that FTF is the phrase I used for them all collectively when making the notes. One thing I wanted to do but am too lazy to do is, maybe someone could take the FTFs from under each “Episode” and make an Islamic reminder/information IG/TikTok account and post them daily or something. Could be a great form of Sadaqah Jaariyah. Please keep me in your Duas and ask Allah SWT to forgive all our sins during this blessed month and beyond! Ameen

[@mohammedmukthar5552]

Grear. Amazing

[@MuminahGamal]

Thank you so much for ur notes, I always read them. May Allah reward you

[@abubakr8232]

@@MuminahGamal Asalaamualaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatahu Ameen Jzakallah Khairan

[@hassank8472]

Love Allah SWT and Prophet Muhammad SAW ❤

[@messianic_scam]

You love a Vengeful murderer?!

[@sameerarahman1809]

i love allah and his messenger

[@maazabbasi495]

@@messianic_scam not a murderer, it was clearly explained if you actually watched this. Kaab committed blatant treason which was and still is considered one of the worst of crimes. There was a reason behind all of this not vengeance

[@saidodteech2102]

@@messianic_scam treason is basis for execution I’m sorry u have no values hopefully you’ll find dem

[@messianic_scam]

@@saidodteech2102 the treason was committed by mohammed they let him in their home he begu to plot and scheming them! he looted their gold it's written in the islam books he was a looter

[@NasirQazi1]

Thank you, May Allah Bless you long healthy happy life so that this torch of light reaches to more people. جزاکم اللہ خیرا

[@halimanoor4367]

Assalam alykum ma sha Allah seerah halaqa are the best Alhamdulillah of internet n you tube

[@zareentaj4440]

Mashallah.excellent..May Allah bless you and your family Mr Yasir qadhi

[@peacenow6618]

May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!

[@k.acharmy3826]

AlhamdulilLah my first lecture completed today Monday 20th September 2021. Jazakum-ul-Lahu Khairan 💝

[@hajihilarsonj.589]

mashaAllah. thanks Shaykh

[@attivamp6435]

Very well Explained !!

[@Perwaizwahab]

Jazak Allahu khyair for upload waiting for the next series

[@abdulid27]

perwaiz wahab I hope you finished all the series

[@peacenow6618]

Jazakallahu Khayran Ahsanul Jaza

[@alybudwani3011]

jazak Allah sheikh

[@ski8615]

respect and love for the greatest off gods creation ya rasulullah ya habiballah Muhammad s.a.w. 💚

[@zulqarnainhaider4739]

Love you shekh

[@azammahmood3951]

Allahu Akbar.

[@syedaamreen2699]

iam very happy Allahamdulliah, we r back ,may ALLAH protect u sheikh.

[@sameerarahman1809]

ameen

[@sabrinayounisaden6413]

jazaaka Allahu qyer

[@shahzad9706]

Almamdullilah its so good to no all about

[@abudujana13]

JAZAKALLAH KHAIR

[@danishbro3777]

Some people use the hadith where the prophet ordered the killing of Ka'b bin al-Ashraf to "prove" that anyone who insults the prophet, his punishment is capital punishment. Lets forget that the arabic word آذى can mean many different things, and that it says Ka'b made "athaa" of both the prophet and Allah آذَى اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ, and let's forget the other proofs brought by the proponents of capital punishment for this offense and lets focus on this hadith alone as it is one of their (in their opinion) strongest proofs for their claim. In his "Fath al-Bari" Ibn Hajar brings different narrations to show and support the fact that Ka'b did not merely insult the prophet, he actually made an alliace with the Quraysh to fight the prophet and all the muslims. Ibn Hajar mentions narrations that shows that Ka'b: 1. Made insulting poetry AND supported the mushrikeen/polytheists (against the prophet) 2. That Ka'b went to the mushrikeen of Quraysh and swoar to fight the muslims, including the prophet. 3. That he encouraged the Quraysh to fight the muslims, and that the prophet found out about this and said: He has showed his hostility towards us.. 4. That Ka'b and others invited the prophet to a gathering where they wanted to deceit him, but the prophet was told about their plans against him before they could hurt him, and then the prophet told his companions to go after Ka'b. (this narration is weak though according to Ibn Hajar himself). Ibn Hajar then mentions that it was the opinion of al-Bukhari that Ka'b was "Muhaarib", one who waged war against the muslims, and that this is evident from al-Bukharis tarjumas to this hadith (different places in his "Sahih", which was Bukharis style): Bukhari says: "Chapter: War is deceit / باب الْحَرْبُ خَدْعَةٌ" And then he brings this hadith: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called war deceit. حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَصْرَمَ، أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ، أَخْبَرَنَا مَعْمَرٌ، عَنْ هَمَّامِ بْنِ مُنَبِّهٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ سَمَّى النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم الْحَرْبَ خُدْعَةً‏.‏ (Sahih al-Bukhari 3029) Then Bukhari says: Chapter: Telling lies in war باب الْكَذِبِ فِي الْحَرْبِ And then he mentions the hadith where the prophet told his companions to go after Ka'b: Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Who is ready to kill Ka`b bin Al-Ashraf who has really hurt Allah and His Apostle?" Muhammad bin Maslama said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Do you like me to kill him?" He replied in the affirmative. So, Muhammad bin Maslama went to him (i.e. Ka`b) and said, "This person (i.e. the Prophet) has put us to task and asked us for charity." Ka`b replied, "By Allah, you will get tired of him." Muhammad said to him, "We have followed him, so we dislike to leave him till we see the end of his affair." Muhammad bin Maslama went on talking to him in this way till he got the chance to kill him. حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ دِينَارٍ، عَنْ جَابِرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏"‏ مَنْ لِكَعْبِ بْنِ الأَشْرَفِ، فَإِنَّهُ قَدْ آذَى اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ‏"‏‏.‏ قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مَسْلَمَةَ أَتُحِبُّ أَنْ أَقْتُلَهُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ قَالَ ‏"‏ نَعَمْ ‏"‏‏.‏ قَالَ فَأَتَاهُ فَقَالَ إِنَّ هَذَا ـ يَعْنِي النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَدْ عَنَّانَا وَسَأَلَنَا الصَّدَقَةَ، قَالَ وَأَيْضًا وَاللَّهِ قَالَ فَإِنَّا قَدِ اتَّبَعْنَاهُ فَنَكْرَهُ أَنْ نَدَعَهُ حَتَّى نَنْظُرَ إِلَى مَا يَصِيرُ أَمْرُهُ قَالَ فَلَمْ يَزَلْ يُكَلِّمُهُ حَتَّى اسْتَمْكَنَ مِنْهُ فَقَتَلَهُ‏.‏ Sahih al-Bukhari 3031 For the prophet Muhammad peace was always his first choice and war was his last choice, but when a man like Ka'b went behind his back and tried to get him and the muslims killed, by joining the very group of people who expelled the prophet and the muslims from Mecca and killed alot of muslims before this, the prophet was forced to defend himself and the muslims from being killed, tortured and expelled from their homes a second time. With all the evidences taking into consideration it is clear that Ka'b did not only insult the prophet verbally, he actually made and alliance with the Quraysh to fight and kill the prophet and the rest of the muslims and he made this very clear by stating this/his loyalty to Quraysh by holding on to the cloth of the Ka'bah (an old practice back then for showing how serious they were about "X") and swearing that he would fight the prophet and the muslims. He knew that the prophet and the muslims would be told about this: That he was now figting the prophet and the muslims alongside with the Quraysh tribe. This was a declaration of war, simple as that. To summarize: Ka'b openly stated that he had become an enemy of the prophet and the muslims and that he was going to fight them alongside the Quraysh tribe, and yes he did insult the prophet verbally and in poems, but that was not the only "harm" / آذى he caused the prophet, as is clear from these evidences. قَوْلُهُ : ( آذَى اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ) فِي رِوَايَةِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ مَحْمُودِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ مَسْلَمَةَ عَنْ جَابِرٍ عِنْدَ الْحَاكِمِ فِي الْإِكْلِيلِ " فَقَدْ آذَانَا بِشِعْرِهِ وَقَوَّى الْمُشْرِكِينَ " وَأَخْرَجَ ابْنُ عَائِذٍ مِنْ طَرِيقِ الْكَلْبِيِّ أَنَّ كَعْبَ بْنَ الْأَشْرَفِ قَدِمَ عَلَى مُشْرِكِي قُرَيْشٍ فَحَالَفَهُمْ عِنْدَ أَسْتَارِ الْكَعْبَةِ عَلَى قِتَالِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ . وَمِنْ طَرِيقِ أَبِي الْأَسْوَدِ عَنْ عُرْوَةَ أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَهْجُو النَّبِيَّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - وَالْمُسْلِمِينَ وَيُحَرِّضُ قُرَيْشًا عَلَيْهِمْ ، وَأَنَّهُ لَمَّا قَدِمَ عَلَى قُرَيْشٍ قَالُوا لَهُ : أَدِينُنَا أَهْدَى أَمْ دَيْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ ؟ قَالَ : دِينُكُمْ . فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - : مَنْ لَنَا بِابْنِ الْأَشْرَفِ فَإِنَّهُ قَدِ اسْتَعْلَنَ بِعَدَاوَتِنَا وَوَجَدْتُ فِي " فَوَائِدِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ الْخُرَاسَانِيِّ " مِنْ مُرْسَلِ عِكْرِمَةَ بِسَنَدٍ ضَعِيفٍ إِلَيْهِ لِقَتْلِ كَعْبٍ سَبَبًا آخَرَ ، وَهُوَ أَنَّهُ صَنَعَ طَعَامًا وَوَاطَأَ جَمَاعَةً مِنَ الْيَهُودِ أَنَّهُ يَدْعُو النَّبِيَّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - إِلَى الْوَلِيمَةِ فَإِذَا حَضَرَ فَتَكُوا بِهِ ، ثُمَّ دَعَاهُ فَجَاءَ وَمَعَهُ بَعْضُ أَصْحَابِهِ ، فَأَعْلَمَهُ جِبْرِيلُ بِمَا أَضْمَرُوهُ بَعْدَ أَنْ جَالَسَهُ ، فَقَامَ فَسَتَرَهُ جِبْرِيلُ بِجَنَاحِهِ فَخَرَجَ ، فَلَمَّا فَقَدُوهُ تَفَرَّقُوا ، فَقَالَ حِينَئِذٍ : مَنْ يَنْتَدِبُ لِقَتْلِ كَعْبٍ . وَيُمْكِنُ الْجَمْعُ بِتَعَدُّدِ الْأَسْبَابِ ... وَصَنِيعُ الْمُصَنِّفِ فِي الْجِهَادِ يُعْطِي أَنَّ كَعْبًا كَانَ مُحَارِبًا حَيْثُ تَرْجَمَ لِهَذَا الْحَدِيثِ " الْفَتْكُ بِأَهْلِ الْحَرْبِ " وَتَرْجَمَ لَهُ أَيْضًا " الْكَذِبُ فِي الْحَرْبِ فتح الباري لابن حجر

[@fathimashanaz4412]

Jazakallah khair Sheikh

[@mdtalhaansari1096]

25:18 The polytheists felt a sense of inferiority to the Yahood. Bro, the polytheists (hyndutva) still feel a sense of inferiority to the Yahood (Zayonizm).

[@user-xn6wo7yi3w]

Trueee

[@FoundationalThoughts]

Extrajudicial murder by nation states are almost a norm in todays world e.g drone attacks, rendition then torture then murder etc etc. So I dont see why anyone today can complain about this and why it needs defending specifically. I don't regard this incident as being extrajudicial anyway, but that's a side issue.

[@michalptacnik1]

Because Islam claims to be divine, so its standards should be far above what is "almost a norm" in todays world. Also, it is worth noting that if you analyse the matter of the infamous American drone attacks, you will see that most of them, and probably one hundred percent were in fact not aimed at civilians but at enemy combatants. Of course it is the bad of America that they entertained the possibility that they might miss, as they indeed had missed, and thereby kill civilians. Still, a mistake is a long way from deliberate acts of oppression.

[@mdarifuzzaman8073]

Michal Ptáčník So you are basically supporting the killing of Woman and Children-killed by the cowards as mistake!!

[@gray_gogy]

@@michalptacnik1 Going with what you said, that justifies this even more. The reason for trial and judgement is to determine whether or not the person is truly guilty. If Islam is divine, there would be no need to have trial as God and his messenger would know for a fact whether or not the person is guilty. However, American government cannot claim to be divine so their attacks are what are truly wrong if you posit such methods of attack to be wrong. But while discussing with those who don't accept Islam as divine, we say that in these circumstances the killing of Ka'b is not oppressive but it is a standard of war the same way America does not put its drone targets on trial. But American drones kill way more than just their intended targets. Its not simply that they miss, even if they hit, they kill many civilians along with the target which Islam would never allow.

[@pops1878]

abdurrahman nashit Brother that comment is from two years ago, I was also about to reply as Ka’ab and the Jewish Tribes commited treason but it is from two years ago. No use replying now.

[@Halaqa]

Yeah I was in the US army years ago. I had a SSG who murdered a child in Iraq. Don't preach here, you have not one iota of moral superiority here. Accept Islam like I did, it's the truth. Go read Bart Ehrman's books. Christianity is not the religion of Jesus ‎ﷺ‎ and Bible scholars all know this nowadays.

[@azammhmd]

MashaAllah.

[@w1zzk1dd]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@omarhassanobeid5722]

I think one other way this could be understood is in light of the verse revealed to our beloved Messenger (SAW) regarding the prisoners of war of Badr and the perfect verdict given to us and the Messenger (SAW) in the Qur'an by Allah (SWT) and what befits him (SAW) until he becomes more powerful. Allah (SWT) knows best and I'm only making an observation in light of the story of Badr.

[@shahidullah2218]

The quraish persecuted the Muslims out of Makkah and confiscated the Muslims lands and property. That is why Allah(SWT) DID SEND WAHI and permitted the Prophet and the Muslims in retribution(DEFENCE) fight back and take what belonged to them to start with.

[@amaanahmed7376]

Summary: Ka’ab Ibn al Ashraf- his father was pagan mother was Jewish from Banu Nadeer. His father committed murder outside of Medina so he fled to Madina and Banu nadeer adopted him. Kaab was one of main leaders, was handsome and was a great poet. His enimosoty towards Islam was since very beginning of Hijra (when Hijra was changed he said why did they change their qibla (Allah quotes him), told his Ansar friends not to give Zakat, (Allah quotes him in An Nisa:37 of those who are stingy). When Muslims came back from Badr and Zaid Ibn Harithah announced all those Quraysh who are dead Kaab said “if this is true it’s better to be dead” (pronounced verdict against himself). After Badr, he took Banu Nadeer to Mecca and formed alliance with Abu sufyan. Sufyan asks him who is more rightly guided (pagans or Muslims), Kaab says Pagans (Allah quotes this: Nisa:51) Allah told Muhammad saw about this alliance. Kaab used to write poetry against Islam, when he got back to Medina he wrote erotic poetry about Muslim women. (It was his idea to poison food which Muhammad saw would later eat) Muhammad Ibn Maslamah volunteered to kill Kaab (Maslamah was from Ous and Nadeer and Ous were good friends). Maslamah was scared he wouldn’t be able to do it so he didn’t eat for 3 days, Muhammad saw said just try. Maslamah called Kaab and started talking about how much hardships Muhammad saw put on us (he wasn’t serious) (Kaab got happy), Maslamah had to give something for mortgage to Kaab since Kaab was money lender (wouldn’t give his wife or son), so he said he’ll give weapons. At night, when Kaab was with his new young wife, Maslamah and Abu Naila (Kaabs foster brother), came to Kaab with weapons and Naila asked “I smell nicest perfume can I smell ur head”, Kaab lowered his head then they held his head and killed him. Muhammad saw had authority to kill him how he wanted since he was leader of Medina. (This secret targeted assasination is still protected today by west)

[@BKAYS]

Subhanallah

[@cara99]

Jutaan Terima Kasih.

[@deannaotero5675]

Greetings of peace.

[@MrDonzaka]

18:45 for those who want to know about ka'b ibn al ashraf

[@thegabutians5588]

May i translate it, and post it in my social media account?

[@ma_0288]

The video was posted 7 years ago your most likely not gonna get a reply it's best to email him

[@salman90818]

Jazakumullah for the channel but pls if its possible upload the lectures early

[@alybudwani3011]

are the books of these great scholars on seerah mentioned available in English to buy?

[@dalmar5567]

Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum

[@hamzakhairi4765]

This story is in Bukhari in between Badr and Uhud not in such detail, but a general idea the specifics are in historical texts

[@chinugee]

Very nice speech. I got a chance to visit the demolished fortress of Ka'ab bin Ashraf. It is a a big fortress. Ka'ab bin Ashraf was a first pornographic poetin this world. Ka'ab is indirectly advised the young jewish and other filthy people to attack the Muslim womens during the night in his poet. So Prophet sallallahu alaiwasallam did a great job to assasinate him the same action.

[@nomanvardag1]

Kaab ibn Ashraf was not the only criminal who was assassinated upon the orders of Prophet Muhammad SAW, instead quite a few similar criminals were assassinated.

[@deannaotero5675]

Just like the presidents and royalty and people in high places have lots of soldiers and security and protection i also have the same thing, in the unseen everywhere I go and intended to stay that way. So yes I also have that same kind of security protection soldiers NATO and its safe. Mrs. Sarah Deanna Palma Otero Medina. My signature is my request also all of our sources for you to document. Thank you! Have a beautiful and blessed day!

[@TheGloriousQuran6236]

How do we reconcile it with this Hadith of the Prophet? *”Faith has restrained assassination. A believer does not assassinate.”* - (Sunan Abī Dāwūd 2769)

[@errank284]

I dont know. I mean killing us forbidden unless they are spreading corruptions on the earth. Same goes i think i dont really know akhi. But its understandable on y he was assasinated

[@The_Voice_of_Reason748]

Who recorded the private conversation in the bedroom where the wife says you are a man at war? What is the source / reference?

[@narafcis7234]

People talk . The wife could have said this to someone and told them exactly who killed her husband

[@abdelbaasit1]

At 49:07, for the Arabic word غِيَرَة «Gheerah» (or ‘Ghayrat’), a possible English translation could be: a type of, “protective jealousy”. ?

[@zakianaznin8889]

Positive jealousy!!

[@stevenv6463]

Yes, that is the word. But I think it is usually used more for the women in your family and your wife.

[@dianaharif]

😊👍🏻😊

[@jane29jeng]

Brother in the class is still not over with the issue of ijtihad.

[@sheriefelsayad5578]

he always interrupts, kinda rude.

[@S3ven4]

He's very rude and doesn't seem to understand that the Prophet (SAW) is guided by Allah divinely and even if the Prophet (SAW) makes the least good decision then Allah will correct him. We have to accept the Prophet PBUH as the law giver in charge by Allah.

[@lubnaahmed8125]

🙏🙏🙏

[@monkmonk3042]

it's completely reasonable to me

[@mahmoodsayeed4]

is this part from december?

[@UNKNOWNB6]

yes

[@waqasabi]

Does anyone know how we know about the conversation that took place between Ka'b and his wife?

[@hanifali2566]

Probably from the wife

[@malikimadhabdeutsch9332]

Imam Anwar al Awlaki (shahid in sha Allah) has a very detailed lecture about it. Google: the dust will never settle down

[@stevenv6463]

Ironically he was extrajudicially killed by the US.

[@abdulazizfareh8927]

Who is that?

[@revivalist355]

@@abdulazizfareh8927 one of the best scholars in our era. May ALLAH grant him Jannah

[@prominecrafter8462]

44

[@m.maghawry4203]

How have we come to know what ka'b's newly wed wife was telling him? "you are a man at war" Did the prophet pbuh tell us that?

[@maryamhussein8834]

+M. Maghawry I don't know if this is the right answer but someone said in another comment that maybe it was his wife who said this. And I think it is possible. She wasn't killed. She could have said this to other people. And Allah (swt) knows best.

[@m.maghawry4203]

I think that could be very plausible. Thank you for taking the trouble and time to try and answer my question. Baraka Allah feeki

[@maryamhussein8834]

M. Maghawry wa iyyaak

[@Mehreensaed]

Where are notes of lectures?

[@zohaibulhassanshahsyed5610]

Adressed To those People who dont like his Explaination about this assassination. Please read the History books on your own. And if you guyz r still so lazy to read on your own, then atleast Listen to Imam Anwar Al Awlaki on this Assassination. Hope you will get some understanding of Islam. And for those in denial...I think you are suffering from Humility caused by Kuffar

[@HakunaMatata-pe6rc]

one confusion is permissing to lie. in bukhari its like the prophet (pbuh) allowed them to lie to kill kaab but in another hadeeth it says that a muslim can be anything but a lier so can you clarify this how one can be allowed to lie for killing some one?

[@maazabbasi495]

I think this is like a circumstantial thing because looking back, there were moments in the Meccan era where the Muslims were allowed to lie to stop being tortured. This must also be a circumstantial thing because it was very important, hence why he asked the prophet saw to lie in the first place. Allah knows best.

[@sabylinn4437]

The prophet said الحرب خدعة what is not understood war is deceiving

[@maganhassan2627]

@@sabylinn4437 what are you talking about

[@munsifahmed7740]

you can lie for killing someone. how cruel religion

[@sportsandgamesfun9017]

56:36 saddam hossain

[@muslimsofwest9380]

As for the narration of Kaab in Sahee Bukhari and Muslim, his words are not the exact words that are used while assassinating him. Muslima asked for lying and while kaab came outside, he and his friends had a plan to kill him ( not to fulfill the deed). And this group of friends, Kaab foster brother was also involved. This hadith is either fabricated or weak and if not, it raises a question what is truth then? Why common muslim who just thinks every hadith is like a word of Quran(God), not follow it and use it these days against others? Of course they would and that is why ISIS, Taliban and so many others are following these kinds of Hadith.

[@sheriefelsayad5578]

You dont have a clue what ur talking about . Ka'b was killed cuz he deserved it, end of story. The little details of how he was killed are not important. And no Jihadist movement has ever used this hadith, so stop dragging in ISIS and all that nonsense .. What ISIS is doing is not found in hadith. You're probably one of those 'Quran only' characters

[@SillyKoala]

I'm not trying to doubt the story. But who did narrate the conversation that happened between Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf and his wife? it's supposed to be private, isn't?

[@truthseeker4490]

his wife,herself may be

[@stevengrantofthegiftshop1549]

I've been wondering the same thing

[@ahmedharris7148]

If I recall correctly, it was preserved in their family history so probably from the wife herself and passed on to her children. I recall reading a Western academic paper that argued for it being preserved in the family.

[@amantubillahi9628]

Ka'b himself might have done in since he told the companions that he was newly wed. Right? Arabs love talking and getting into details. He could have boasted about it.

[@pops1878]

His newly wed

[@_ShahriarKabir]

How Mohammad ibn maslamah was allowed to tell lie when it is forbidden at any case. Any clarification would be appreciated.

[@junioredits25]

His telling a lie for a good cause and he seeks permission from the Prophet (saw) and the prophet gives him permission furthermore if it really was a sin. Probably the Prophet would have asked Allah to forgive him. So there wouldn’t a issue in any case.

[@_ShahriarKabir]

@@junioredits25 Tnx for the reply, but still there is an issue, if that is true then people will start to lie thinking it is a good cause for himself. Even Ibrahim as could not lie to save himself (that was a good cause) ,still he made a white lie...any provided knowledge would be appreciated

[@junioredits25]

@@_ShahriarKabir Ibrahim is a Prophet and it’s not appropriate for a Prophet to lie although the lies they might say will be really minor and would be overlooked and forgiven by Allah. In this case Muhammad (saw) didn’t actually tell him to lie. Also how is he going to kill him without saying some sort of a lie it’s pretty impossible to assassinate a person who’s a politician like Ka’ab plus it’s basically not a lie since he told the Prophet that he is going to say something about him so Rasullah knew that something would be said about him and he gave permission for it so technically we can count it as not being a lie.

[@_ShahriarKabir]

@@junioredits25 tnx for the answer, yeap i did see technical use of some things...

[@user-gs9gr3jb5k]

38:51

[@naimulmusfiqnaim8364]

Is Assassination permitted or supported in Islami? Assassination seems to be something unethical. If anyone went against treaty then why wasn't he judicially killed?

[@Snailryder]

Naimulmusfiq Naim There was no judiciary...these were different tribes who existed without being under the rule of one king...whatever the Prophet SAW did was under the guidance of Allah...he was a threat, he had to be taken care of, simple.

[@rastgo3231]

مسلمانان, سلفیها و غیره میگویند صحابه از پیامبر ص حدیث شنیدند و به تابعین و تابعین به مردم گفتند, حقایق آنطور نیست: ذهبی عالم مشهور اهل سنت، به نقل از عایشه می‌نویسد که او گفت: «پدرم تمام احادیثی که از پیامبر (صلی‌الله‌علیه‌وآله) موجود بود را جمع کرد که تعداد آن احادیث به پانصد حدیث می‌رسد. آن شب، پدرم تا صبح منقلب بود و خوابش نمی‌برد.» عایشه می‌گوید: «به پدرم گفتم از این حال تو محزون و غمگین شده‌ام. آیا درد و کسالتی داری که این‌ چنین در بستر خود غلت می‌زنی؟! هنگامیکه صبح فرا رسید، پدرم به من گفت، هر آنچه احادیث نزد خود داری، برای من بیاور.» عایشه در ادامه می‌گوید: «آن احادیث را برای پدرم آوردم و او تمامی آن احادیث را به آتش کشید.»[1] [1]. شمس الدین ذهبی، طبقات الحفاظ، دار الكتب العلمية بيروت- لبنان، چاپ اول 1419هـ، ج1، ص10؛ «قالت عائشة: جمع أبي الحديث ... فدعا بنا فحرقها.» 2. عبدالله بن العلاء گوید: «از قاسم خواستم تا احادیثی را بر من املا کند. گفت: احادیث در عصر عمر زیاد شد. پس، از مردم خواست که آن احادیث را بیاورند. وقتی آوردند، دستور داد آنها را بسوزانند».[20] 3. عمر به همه شهرها نوشت: «نزد هر کس حدیث هست، باید نابودش کند».[21] 4. محمد بن ابوبکر نقل کرده است: «در زمان عمر احادیث زیاد شد. وقتی آنها را به نزدش آوردند، دستور داد تمامشان را بسوزانند».[22] به قدری این مسئله شدّت یافت که راویان به خود جرئت و اجازه نقل احادیث را نمی دادند. به دو نمونه توجه کنید: شعبی می گوید: «یک سال با پسر عمر (عبدالله) همنشین بودم. از وی، حتی یک حدیث هم از پیامبر(ص) نشنیدم».[23] سائب بن یزید می گوید: «از مدینه تا مکه با سعد بن مالک همسفر بودم. در طول سفر، حتی یک حدیث از پیامبر(ص) نقل نکرد».[24] [20] . طبقات ابن سعد، ج5، ص187 و 237. [21] . کنزالعمال، ج5، ص237. [22] . طبقات ابن سعد، ج5، ص187. [23] . سنن ابن ماجه، بیروت، داراحیاء التراث العربی، ص11. [24] . همان، ص12.

[@TheBozz2005]

Who ever uploads all these seerahs without taking care of track and causing chaos in numbers clearly misunderstood islam, for what reason then do u upload? will you not consider?

[@EsoTarek]

What are you on about?

[@TheBozz2005]

@@EsoTarek the chaos that is dealt with by now dear Tarek

[@EsoTarek]

@@TheBozz2005 your comment doesn't make sense

[@TheBozz2005]

@@EsoTarek not anymore no. hope my reaction does

[@EsoTarek]

@@TheBozz2005 anymore? It didn't even make sense then lol.. nor do any of your following comments

[@imtiazmahmood4303]

0

[@Jehan99100]

Why is it that in so many narrations we find the Prophet to be extremely forgiving and merciful, but in a few narrations like this one with Kab bin Ashraff we find him to be angry and vengeful? Personally I think this narration goes against the noble and beautiful character of the Prophet. Why also would he sanction his companions to be deceitful and treacherous? Many scholars held the opinion that if a narration contradicts with others and with the overall character and message of the Prophet, one of mercy and love, then it can be rejected. So I see no problem in rejecting this entire story. Just because it is in Bukhari does not mean it has to be accepted blindly. Bukhari himself was a human being and all human beings make mistakes. Only the prophets are protected from sin just as they are protected from anger, hatred and vengeance. I pray I am not being an apologetic or an innovator, rather I am simply using my mind to properly understand the Deen rather than blindly following scholars and their narrations.

[@maganhassan2627]

That dude committed many crimes including treason which is a big crime ka'ab knew what he's doing lol even the wife knew he'll get killed by basically declaring war so he's dealt with how he should be dealt it's not surprising we hear prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ordering people to be executed. Remember he's the judge too apparently at that stage there weren't system of trials nor prison Allah knows best though what's the point of a trial when the prophet (peace be upon him) knew ka'ab was guilty of the many crimes he done so this is what appropriate in that time plus this isn't a personal vendetta it's crime against Allah & his messenger it affects the muslim community as they would be danger if abu sufiwan & his troops surprised attacked them. It's mentioned in other sources too not just bukhari & muslim this isn't about blindly following those scholars so how this inauthentic I don't get your point? You need to understand the situation why this happened. Allah knows best. Also understand the prophet (peace be upon him) was human he can be angry, hate something & do mistakes though not big 1s again this incident isn't some personal vendetta against ka'ab so this was justified from my understanding & the prophet (peace be upon him) never did personal vendetta like how he was grabbed by that leader of the Jewish tribe the hypocrite but didn't do anything & he let the Jewish tribe go the sheikh talked about it in the last episode. I think you're being apologetic by rejecting this story despite being proven it's authentic.

[@mohamedmo8128]

@@maganhassan2627 It's not just a matter of it being a crime. The Prophet’s mission was to spread the message of Islam across the entire world. Anyone who poses a threat to his ummah, had to be dealt with. How come you don't find this much outrage about Americans killing Osama Bin Laden inside his house?

[@maganhassan2627]

@@mohamedmo8128 interesting point I was thinking osama bin laden wasn't even put in trial lol they just raided his house (it was surprise attack lol) & killed him & many people were fine with this lol why is the assassination of ka'ab such a problem then??

[@mohamedmo8128]

@@maganhassan2627 Also the CIA has a long history of carrying out assassinations. They tried to assassinate Fidel Castro multiple times. Soleimani was literally bombed while attending a meeting in Iraq in 2020.

[@ArdoBlueMoon]

@@mohamedmo8128 Your point about OBL's assassination is spot on! Putting someone on trial in times of war when the evidence is apparent isn't always practical.

[@qaipak1]

This guy believes ibn ishaq like the word of God. This story has an incredible amount of loopholes and just goes totally against the character of the prophet PBUH.

[@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq]

So executing a traitor who was writing poems against Muslim women is wrong

[@qaipak1]

@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq not by tricking him to com out of his house. Prophet never did that. Some people would rather say bad stuff about our prophet then realize ibn ishaq could be wrong

[@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq]

@@qaipak1 deception is part of warfare so yes you can deceive the enemy. This man declared war so he got what he deserved

[@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq]

@@qaipak1 you have a very fairytale understanding of reality. If this man wasn’t executed he could have started a battle and leaked inside information that could have killed many people

[@qaipak1]

@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq learn to read - execution by tricking someone to come out is not how the prophet executed people

[@FariahH28]

This is certainly problematic. Either Muslims must admit that the Prophet (pbuh) killed people for simply speaking against him, or they must admit that some of the hadith which they believe are simply not true. There is a significant amount of contradictory evidence in these hadith... yet they are held in as high regard as the Quran itself by some people. It is no wonder that is so much confusion, discord and agreement in the Muslim community.

[@AhmadAdyarso]

it is hadits, muttafaqun alaih (agreed by both Bukhari and Muslim). Bukhari no. 4037 and Muslim no. 1801.

[@WacefChowdhury]

The video outlines: Nasty propoganda against muslims particularly women Treason Helping enemies of the state...the tribe already helped the attackers as mentioned and the man himself was plotting with abu sufian to assassinate the Prophet SAWS its not just for speaking out against him We must excercise caution and intellect in deriving conclusions :) Hypothetical example: Alfredia(majority Hindu tribes country) and Batmania(majority Christian tribes country) are at war. There is a area in Batmania where mostly Jewish communities live.... they hosted and refreshed the Alfredians before they go on to COVERTLY attack Batmanians and loot and kill a couple of them as well before fleeing. the Leader of this country, Batman still lets the Jewish tribes be... Then of Jewish leaders of that very community (supposedly a fellow countryman) start propoganda against the Virgin birth of Jesus, the trinity, against Batman and spreads sexual poetry about the nuns of Batmania...still alive btw....THEN this guy in full knowledge of his tribe that already hosted Alfredians as guests before they attack Batmania (treason) starts plotting with Alfred (leader) of the Alfredians to kill Batman all the while living within Batmania. What is the verdict against such a man? Also factor in that Batman maybe still has the Jewish tribe as a whole...so instead of Banning the whole Jewish community from Batmania..instead of starting civil war by formally executing this Jewish leader...he lets his special ops team go on a mission to deal with the treason...spy...enemy of state...helper of Alfredians during war...etc. it's not a perfect example but a parallel...soon as you take the word Muslim out of the story this somehow get easier to understand :/ Allah knows best what and how things happened...but I know this much...the rasool SAWS is perfect and as is the Justice of Allah...at difficult situations like this as in every case, I will place my trust on Him and His messenger when my logic and rationing fails...which is limited unlike the wisdom of Allah and His Rasool SAWS

[@Drigger95]

Abdullah Ibn Ubayy constantly undermined the Prophet to his face, yet he wasn't assassinated. It's more than speaking out against him. The Prophet(s) never took revenge for a personal matter. This dude committed treason, and he actually provided Abu Sufyan with supplies to attack and kill 2 muslims in a raid. Unless you think that's "free speech" I don't think anyone was shedding tears when this douchbag was killed.

[@stevengrantofthegiftshop1549]

Did you even watch the whole lecture?

[@ahmedharris7148]

As a political realist, it seems pretty unproblematic to me. In fact, it makes me happy that the Prophet too was at times a political realist. Any political state would have long executed an enemy of the state for treason during a time of war. The penalty of treason is death in most nation states today.

[@zcs7676]

Yasir is a khariji from what I can tell. Saying there is no Islamic govt. Is from their characteristics.

[@sheriefelsayad5578]

idiot. he is right , there is no islamic government

[@dxsaqibdy]

There is no islamic govt

[@suerayss]

what a mess mohammed't times were with intrigue, hate and backstabbing and connivance. I think these characteristics still exists in islam and islamic nations. How can this be callled religion if allah is also taking sides. disgusting.

[@abzbari5177]

You will lean the truth one day, which face will you show on the day allah swt questions you ?

[@najiahossain4765]

It does not matter what kind of political system it had on that time. How could assassination take place? If it was about hurting/harming Allah or eventually Muhammad (S:), Allah could punish him by taking his life. How prophet told muslema to lie!!! killing some one deceiving!!! i can't accept the explanation.

[@najiahossain4765]

What happening now a days you can't even compare....because we don't have prophesy. As it was about the time of the prophet Muhammad (S:) everyone is willing to know about his life, decision and thinking process. There are lots of history but our prophet is not a story. That is the reason we need to know the truth.

[@truthseeker4490]

if we had been present there it might have made sense to us....Allah could have taken his life without all this but still after his death the jews of madina got threatened...if he had died of any diseases they wouldn't have been threatened....and about telling lies,when judge says that someone is harmful for the country then govt try to execute the criminal by any means...if u want to kill a rat u entice him with poisoned food ..it's one kind of lie too

[@najiahossain4765]

So you want to say that my religion is about threatening anyone?!? Islam is all about peace as it means, not threatening anyone. You explanation is not accepted as it goes against the basic of my religion. Govt never executes anyone in the dark! Kaab was not a rat, a HUMAN. I have been taught all my life that at any situation I should not lie; even not to hide the truth. These explanation is not acceptable what I have been learnt about my religion.

[@truthseeker4490]

threatening them means keeping them away from plotting anything evil... they lived in a different time...they had to engage in battles...it was easy for us to become muslims because they conquered our land...otherwise we would have remained as our forefathers were many years ago...u can lie in the battlefield as far as i know...and yesterday i heard a beautiful hadith that prophet(sm) never punished someone just because he didn't like that person....rather he only punished someone when he thought it was good for the muslims...so don't think kaab was executed just because prophet(sm) was personally displeased with him...

[@truthseeker4490]

yes u might grow some sympathy for him when u hear how they killed him but still we need to realize that whatever Allah lets happen, there is "hiqma" behind it...i was also not fully satisfied watching this video...i was also thinking why he was killed that way..And Allah knew what was happening in my mind so he presented that hadith to me where i came to know that rasul(sm) only executed someone when he thought it was better for the ummah,not for his personal grudge against him...

[@amixofeverything]

The story of Ka'b ibn al Ashraf is yet one of many reasons why Islam must be scorned, mocked, ridiculed, and rejected.

[@WillScarlet1991]

Says the Islamophobe.

[@S3ven4]

How? You have a political leader that has someone who is essentially committing treason. Not only did Ka'b and the Banu Nadhir have a treaty with the Holy Prophet (SAW) and break it, but he was also causing discord within the ummah by making foul poetry about Islam and the women of Islam. Filthy behavior, and the treason alone would get anyone in any time and place executed. Even the manner in which the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) killed him was fine. The political leader asked his men to go and take care of him. Simple as that. It's barely a story. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) isn't just sent to sing kumbayah with everyone, he is a political leader as well as a religious leader that has to make these decisions.

[@amixofeverything]

@@S3ven4 Again, why theocracy should be mocked and scorned. It is an idiotic concept that creates second-class citizens.

[@S3ven4]

@@amixofeverything you haven’t had a rebuttal besides religion bad. Change the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ to the EU or the USA It’s the same principle: A company you have an agreement with violates it by plotting with an enemy country. There will be severe consequences to this, whether it is warfare, economic sanctions or anything.

[@ChristianPrinceTeaches]

Something to mention just to uncover the lies: "He (Muhammad) never kept any males Slaves, whenever slave that he got he freed that slave." "These are the names of Muhammad's male slaves: Yakan Abu Sharh, Aflah, 'Ubayd, Dhakwan, Tahman, Mirwan, Hunayn, Sanad, Fadala Yamamin, Anjasha al-Hadi, Mad'am, Karkara, Abu Rafi', Thawban, Ab Kabsha, Salih, Rabah, Yara Nubyan, Fadila, Waqid, Mabur, Abu Waqid, Kasam, Abu 'Ayb, Abu Muwayhiba, Zayd Ibn Haritha, and also a black slave called Mahran, who was re-named (by Muhammad) Safina (`ship')." Ibn Qayyim Zad al-Ma'ad, pp. 115 "Mohammed had many male and female slaves. He used to buy and sell them, but he purchased more slaves than he sold, especially after God empowered him by His message, as well as after his immigration from Mecca. He once sold one black slave for two. His name was Jacob al-Mudbir. His purchases of slaves were more than he sold. He was used to renting out and hiring many slaves, but he hired more slaves than he rented out." pp.160 and also: " ...So I went to the upper room where the Prophet was and requested to a black slave of his: "Will you get the permission of (Allah's Apostle) for Umar (to enter)? The slave went in, talked to the Prophet about it..." Sahih Bukhari Hadith 2468 there is also a balck slave called called Anjasha And he even enslaved a free slave again: A man decided that a slave of his would be manumitted after his death and later on he was in need of money, so the Prophet (ﷺ) took the slave and said, "Who will buy this slave from me?" Nu'aim bin `Abdullah bought him for such and such price and the Prophet (ﷺ) gave him the slave. Sahih Bukhari Hadith 2141

[@theilmlounge]

This is not a lie. How easily u misunderstood all the hadith. Prophet s.a.w never kept slaves, he frees all of them and they voluntarily stayed with Him because of His good character and manners. The last hadith h have referred, in it Prophet s.a.w was making a light heart joke with him and by slave he meant slave of Allah. We r all slaves of Allah. Please refine ur understanding about hadith better. Study with a teacher. Then reply.

[@ChristianPrinceTeaches]

@@theilmlounge wrong my friend. how does one free slaves when he is selling them? And argue with your scriptures or let it be

[@sumitwalia87]

And how come attacking a far away caravan was justified on moral reason. He was a prophet, shud have been happy in madina with his ppl, why was he sending his men to loot quraishs? How can this be justified? Your best defence would be “whatever he did is binding to us, Allah did not send any wahi, so he approved looting of Caravan”. Ohh sorry, ganimat as you said😲😲😲😲😲 strange that allah was happy seeing his followers looting others..

[@shahidullah2218]

The quraish persecuted the Muslims out of Makkah and confiscated the Muslims lands and property. That is why Allah(SWT) DID SEND WAHI and permitted the Prophet and the Muslims in retribution(DEFENCE) fight back and take what belonged to them to start with.

[@sumitwalia87]

@@shahidullah2218 yeah... thats a nice “divine” excuse to raid and loot caravans👍👍👍👍

[@saimtanweer5720]

@@sumitwalia87 so now muslim can't fight back to take there property being confiscated by quraish

[@sumitwalia87]

@@saimtanweer5720 dont try to play victim card. It does not matter if it was muslim ir Christian or jew or hindu, raiding a caravan by saying it was our property and God has asked us to raid and loot it, simply does not go well with the general defination of God. Unless you start putting ur own wish in “God”’s mouth. No one has any moral right to loot an innocent caravan- leace aside a divine right or order.

[@saimtanweer5720]

@@sumitwalia87 innocent carvan 😂😂 , they were selling muslim's property and there was no police to complain , so what to do ???

[@sumitwalia87]

So the man said “allow me to lie” and the prophet approved therequest to kill an enemy. Why r u trying to compare it with tge US drone atrikes to justify the immoral way to get rid of enemy. How does it suit the conduct of a prophet who came to enlighten the “jahalee” tribals. You r simply saying “it was right because the prophet did it”. That means nothing can be questioned on even moral basis. The guy has a blanket approval to do anything he likes. Your best ( and the ONLY) defence is “allah did not send down a wahi (that too would come to the man who authorised the killing), so allah was also OK with it.” How convenient!!

[@lubnaahmed1299]

🙏🙏🙏