Seiko SLA025 Hi-Beat Review

Seiko SLA025 Hi-Beat Review on the JustBlueFish KZbin channel, home of high quality wristwatch and horology related reviews and videos.
Special thanks to Exquisite Timepieces for loaning the watch:
www.exquisitetimepieces.com
5 Ways You Can Help JustBlueFish
Direct Donation:
www.paypal.me/...
Become a Patreon:
/ justbluefish
Shop on Amazon (my affiliate link):
amzn.to/2rIzw9K
Provide Watches for Review (contact me):
[e-mail]
My Social Media Accounts:
/ justbluefish
/ justbluefish007
/ justbluefish
#####################################
Up for review today, a Seiko SLA025 Hi-Beat, a tribute to the 1968 6159-7001 saturation dive watch.
#####################################
Thanks for watching!

[@jimmymack1079]

So many negative comments, mainly from people who have no appreciation of the Seiko brand or its history. This is the ultimate Seiko diver. GS offerings are too blingy and don’t adhere to the legacy of the original automatic Seiko divers. The SLA017 is too dainty for me, I have large wrists so can live with the dimensions of this piece. I’d take this over a Submariner any day of the week. As for all the comments preferring an Omega for the price - I’m about to sell two Seamasters to finance this beauty. What a watch.

[@JustBlueFish]

You do have a point. People are missing that this is nearly Grand Seiko quality, and is priced to match. But you have to appreciate the history of thenwatch to which it is based on, the 1968 Hi-Beat Diver, which is why this doesn’t wear a Grand Seiko logo.

[@jameshoward9700]

Nice review, man. Amazing watch and proof that great Seikos don't have to be Grand Seikos. So much nicer than current Prospex models with their unnecessary, tacky 'X' (P/S, I know). Shows us what divers were when they were true tool watches. Beauty follows function.

[@marioboglione]

the "daddy" of Seiko Divers - simply beautiful !

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@Trugoy1]

I just saw this watch in person and holy moly what a looker. I just came back from Tudor and I’m still considering buying this one!

[@wierzchos]

Really nice review man. One comment, that style of strap is usually referred to as "Waffle strap" in the Seiko community, and not pyramid. They put this watch on that strap as an homage to the vintage seiko divers that originally came in waffle straps like the refs. 6105 or 6217. Keep up the good work!

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for the info.

[@UptickWatchReviews]

What always stops me from buying this watch is the alternatives in the price range. You really have to love this design over anything else to accept paying over 4 grand (they can be found cheaper than 5k in Asia) for a movement that’s not guaranteed to be accurate, a silicon strap and that chunky profile. If it wasn’t limited, it’d likely be 3 grand after a year. It’s great for collectors let’s say.

[@1malikalik]

I agree with you 💯. This watch model is ideal for collectors for the stated reasons. The MM300 is a perfect alternative and ideal for daily wear.

[@WatchGeek]

Excellent video and excellent watch that will appreciate in price, that is certain. The increased size compared to the original is what turns me down from it.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah that’s a good point. If it’s anything like the 017 62Mas reissue it will go up in price.

[@kevinc1001]

Your so lucky to review this watch. I actually have this watch as my iPhone screen wallpaper.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching Kevin. Hope you enjoyed the review.

[@seikopurist4110]

Another excellent review, Guy!!! A beautiful watch but I'm in total agreement with you regarding its official accuracy rating. I don't fancy the prospect of bringing a $5K+ watch in for service; only to have the vendor tell me that it's not covered by warranty because performance is within specs :-/

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks buddy’s I appreciate it.

[@mikev3245]

Nice review as always. Given the concerns of its accuracy and your viewers curiosity, it would have been great if you had tested it on your timegrapher (I have a feeling you probably did) and included the results in your review.

[@JustBlueFish]

I did throw down the time Grapher. It ran well, but the reason I didn’t really talk about it on the video is because while this particular example might be keeping excellent time there’s no guarantee that one example to the next will be any better than -10 to +15. The results of the specific watch are largely irrelevant if the specifications and guarantee are much wider.

[@edwardblack7133]

@@JustBlueFish which result do you take from the timeographer? Average? Each position?

[@lucioledizerot196]

This is really an instance where you pay a large portion of the price for the history and the limited edition of the watch. Personally, at this price, I'd go for other options.

[@JustBlueFish]

Absolutely true.

[@lucioledizerot196]

"I'm not much of a guy" - Guy, 2018

[@JustBlueFish]

Lol

[@philipsdefreville6138]

Guy, thanks for doing this review. I really liked your comments and how you balanced them. I found it very objective and professional, even though you did give some personal opinions. I have seen this watch in the flesh, but was not aware of the movement accuracy specs. I think the hands and lume surrounds are gold because that is how the original was. I also think the 44.5mm size is the same as the original. Also, as you pointed out the original would also have had 19mm lugs, like all Seiko sports models at the time. As a tribute to the original, this is a very nice diver. I did however find it thick, but then again if you think about the historical context of the watch, a tool dive watch from 1968, that was designed for durability and able to withstand the pressure of deep dives, the size and design fits the purpose... a tough watch, for a tough guy who can handle a chunk of watch on his wrist.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah I think you're right about those aspects of the watch being true to the original. I guess I should have made it clear that I wouldn't have liked those aspects of the original watch either haha. It's all just personal taste on a lot of that though.

[@philipsdefreville6138]

@@JustBlueFish Guy, also worth noting is this Seiko won Best Sports watch last week at GPHG | © Fondation du Grand Prix d'Horlogerie de Genève in Geneva beating out Swiss watches.

[@TinBin-Craig]

nice watch but i would buy a grand seiko or omega for that price... cheers

[@JustBlueFish]

I suspect a lot of people are going to ageee with you. You probably need to be a big fan of the 1968 Seiko watch this is a reissue of to want to buy this.

[@airborneSGT]

You can get a new Grand Seiko for that price! I know I bought two new GS watches this year.

[@superfast30]

Far more special than a seamaster!

[@marcel9688]

As always a top review Guy. Please get back to doing this regularly. Your voice in the watch world is much appreciated 👍

[@johnnyguitar6697]

Good, balanced review. I am a big Seiko / Grand Seiko fan, but I am a bit perplexed with their direction over the past few years. As you point out, this is not to the same standard as a GS (at the very least the movement is not finished / regulated like one), but its price point is right up there. Likewise the SLA019J1, which is in excess of USD 3,500, or the SLA017 at USD 4,000. Not so long ago, Seiko was offering the SBDX001, also with a less finished / regulated GS movement, with both metal bracelet and rubber strap included, for around USD 1,800. It looks like they are milking the limited edition trend for all its worth. It's a dangerous path to walk, just ask Panerai or even Omega. As for the watch itself, it's far too big and thick for my taste. And the decision to bring the strap to 19mm is bizarre. On my ex-SBDX001, 20mm was already narrow compared to the case. It's even worse on this one.

[@JustBlueFish]

I did a video, "Has Seiko Jumped the Shark" or something like that, where I voice all of the things you're mentioning. Check it out if you haven't already.

[@johnnyguitar6697]

@@JustBlueFish Just checked out that video - mirrors my thoughts exactly. Also, am I the only one yearning for a diver that is not gigantic? I would love to see a GS diver under 42mm diameter and 13mm thick, possibly in titanium, at around USD 5,000. I'm sure it would sell like hot cakes.

[@carlosdelacadiz6658]

Beautiful and well made time piece and great tool watch. I don't see why so many people saying they wouldn't purchase it,just because doesn't say Grand on it?

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah I knew people would have a hard time wrapping their minds around thismwatch not being Grand Seiko. Thing is, it can’t be one. It’s a reissue ofma watch made in 1968, and that watch wasn’t a Grand Seiko.

[@carlosdelacadiz6658]

@@JustBlueFish Grand just a marketing device to denote a luxury line within Seiko,Credor haute horology,Seiko for the rest but this Seiko is extremely well finished when held.Id have no problem purchasing this if was in market for a tool watch with a hi-beat movement.

[@bullitt411]

Excellent review. Seiko made many missteps with this release which is very unfortunate. I know Seiko doesn't regulate their movements, owning a SBDX017 (also monoblock) I had to come to grips with whatever accuracy out of the box I'd be getting. For a watch at this price point though, especially taking into account the limited number of pieces, Seiko should have regulated all the movements. Additionally, what they were thinking making the lug width 19mm, I'm sure I don't know. 19mm greatly limits strap choices on a watch that already doesn't come with a steel bracelet. I realize this is a faithful representation to the original, but they could have made small changes to accommodate modern watch wearing practices.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah the lug width in particular is a little disappointing.

[@fire_watch7735]

Great video... The proportions of this watch and most Seiko's are proposterious😫 Come on Seiko.... the price is also ridculous🤔 Lastly, Seiko themselves have stated that this isn't a Grand Seiko movement although many people try to pass it along as that and the accuracy is unacceptable at this rice range...

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@jaewooklee5862]

Overall quality seems better than Omega Seamaster diver 300m (old version)

[@JustBlueFish]

I haven’t seen a new 2018 SMP, but this one seems up there with some of the older models. Except for the absence of a bracelet.

[@jaewooklee5862]

JustBlueFish Watch Reviews Do you know this model have got the GPHG prize for the best sports watch category a few days ago?

[@jaewooklee5862]

JustBlueFish Watch Reviews www.gphg.org/horlogerie/en/prize-list-18

[@TheWayofGrace89]

If this were 40-42mm and under $3k I’d be interested. Ridiculous pricing, although the monobloc case is sick.

[@JustBlueFish]

That and add a bracelet!

[@ridewith7480]

You want a totally diff watch hahahahahah

[@Hoppetakeyama]

Great review. Very informative and truthful review.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks

[@surfitli]

Very nice watch, but $5,000 is a lot. No bracelet, and an odd 19mm luge size. You would really need to like this watch the way it is to justify the purchase. I recently purchased a Seiko Transocean, which is about 1/5 of this watches price. While it’s using the lesser 6r15, yourgetting sapphire, Diashield, a Cermanic Bezel, and a Bracelet on a very uniquely Seiko diver.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching I appreciate it.

[@craig2100]

I wish there were a true midlevel offering between the GS and the SARY style watch, but at a lower price offering. They would steal the market. I love the movement of this watch, but it's too big.

[@JustBlueFish]

Agreed. Something around $2000 with this 8L55 movement and a little nicer finishing than the more affordable models.

[@chrisg-gg2iu]

I agree that this watch SLA025 at ~5k and the SLA017 at ~4k are polarizing. Many people wished that Seiko would have released these watches which are truer version of the watches they emulate and what are essentially Prospex watches at more accessible prices. Yes, these each have their own modern reissues, but are not the same. Additionally polarizing is the re-release of the MarineMaster with new model# SBDX023 at ~3k with the addition of sapphire crystal, ceramic bezel, gold tone second hand, & prospex tagging and removal of the Marinemaster text. Is all that worth an extra 1K for an SBDX023 vs SBDX017? I don’t know. At these prices, we’re approaching used or possibly new Swiss luxury watch range (e.g. Omega) and Grand Seiko prices.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching and sharing some great thoughts and perspective.

[@temujinadonijah6365]

Thankyou so much for an honest in depth review thanks makes a change for a channel 👋🏿👍🏾

[@petershallis2294]

I like this watch a great deal, even withstanding your accurate criticisms. It is quite a niche piece, mind and hardly represents value for money...I'm wondering what it's for though, 1500 is too high a production level for it to become a "safe queen" investment, and the salty price means only the very well heeled will wear this as its design dictates - casual sports watch.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching Peter.

[@ssvs0485]

So much better deal for the regular MM, you get the bracelet, same finishing, same movement just not tweaked to be a high beat. And you get a ceramic bezel insert.

[@JustBlueFish]

I haven’t ever seen the MM.

[@marcocastagnetti7086]

Hi Guy, I agree with your veiws totally for the price you should be getting a steel bracelet & regulation and a lowered price bracket it's just as well it's a limited production because I don't think it would sell well if it wasn't, it's a perfect example why the mm300 has done so well, better value I feel.

[@JustBlueFish]

I’ve never seen the Marine Master in person. I’d like to have had that as a basis for comparison.

[@marcocastagnetti7086]

Yes that would of been a great video, but like most Seiko's there is always some short fall with the watches and with the mm300 (in my opinion) that people don't seem to mention is the fine threaded crown tube which is heart in the mouth time when rethreading, the sumo has a better thread I just don't understand Seiko's thinking.??

[@malkinmalone]

I would really love to own a hi beat movement some day. Im glad to have watches that are only 3hz for everyday use but it would be great to have something like this that you only wind up and use a couple times a year. I have an omega planet ocean already in this price category so i dont feel the need to get that type of brand name for my money. I can certainly understand where someone buying their first luxury watch they might want a brand name with a little more cache than seiko. As far as the accuracy goes 10 seconds a day is fine with me. Im not sending a watch in for regulation over that. Most watches run better on the wrist then when they are in one position on a timegrapher anyway. Great review! Awesome watch.

[@65mree]

Best review i've seen of this watch. I happened to see this watch here in the Seiko store in NYC. I agree beautiful watch but too high a price point. At that level it competes w/the Omega Planet Ocean, soi don't know that the value is there.

[@JustBlueFish]

It’s a big premium for being limited edition.

[@iainrossiter758]

I’m still not sure why Seiko underquote their accuracy on the high end pieces. The 8L35/55 are generally +/-3 sec and stay that way for years. I have a beautiful SBDX017 on the way in the post. Certainly better value for money than the majority of the new SLA re-interpretation models, often with the same 8L35 movement. This SLA would have to be up there with Grand Seiko and true Seiko diver fans would fully appreciate it. Even though it’s less of an accurate re-interpretation I’d probably prefer the SLA039.

[@levedia]

OMG i wish i had this watch

[@mr_frapps]

yes, it's a clock that costs a lot and the only thing that distinguishes it is the high-frequency caliber. however, it is a piece of very high build quality, with a very balanced design like none of those of its time (and today). as an Italian and a designer who loves beauty, I can not congratulate those who created this piece, worthy of MoMa. 5000 euros? a detail ;)

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@danielmeier8321]

Damn, for that kind of money you could actually get a nice watch.

[@Ge0rGi.]

Like what?

[@JustBlueFish]

But would it be limited edition!?!

[@danielmeier8321]

@@Ge0rGi. Rolex OP, Omega Seamasters, Omega Speedmaster etc. When i look at those seiko divers, i always get the skx feeling which i can get for 150 bucks. Im most certainly wrong about that, since im pretty sure the quality is way better. BUT, i think the feeling that a watch gives you is the most important factor.

[@Ge0rGi.]

Daniel Meier Probably you have this feeling because you don’t have a clue about watches . Rolex? Yeah ,but what kind of Rolex with this money? A crap one! Omega ? A brand resurrected,owned and made by swatch group ! Seiko is independent like Rolex with real history in diving watches. Watch this video and learn something kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXeai4Suo9SVfpY

[@danielmeier8321]

@@Ge0rGi. I know the History of seiko. I actually doubt that there is a crappy rolex out there. Once again, i dont buy watches because of logical reasons. If this was the case, id buy a gshock for 80 bucks and would be done with it. I also doubt that this seiko is crappy watch, its probably a very good watch, but i dont get a nice feeling when i see it. Im not going to insult you like you did, i dont care if get hate for my opinion. And i do recognize that my statement was pretty provocative and a bit sarcastic.

[@derekshearer9049]

You do very well executed videos. This Seiko is a a big watch, with a price tag to match. Seiko has their fans, l am not one.

[@JustBlueFish]

It is indeed a big watch in size and price.

[@pibblesnbits]

I bought one of these six months ago and was vastly disappointed with it. The watch arrived with a bezel that was not aligned with the dial markers and the bezel had a finishing defect new out of the box. I regretfully decided to get it fixed under warranty and I am still waiting for the parts for the repair. This is not Grand Seiko level quality; I should of bough a Grand Seiko. What's worse is that it is treated as a regular Seiko and not a Grand Seiko when being warrantied/serviced.

[@thomastan1658]

Thats sucks

[@JustBlueFish]

That’s a shame sorry to hear it.

[@edwardblack7133]

thats terrible, for me unless its Grand Seiko I now never buy them online as I need to see it and check the QC myself

[@davec3651]

Having inspected one myself, and as owner of multiple GS plus a SLA017, I agree this is NOT near a Grand Seiko level finished watch. The reviewer is off base there. The dial finishing is so underwhelming. This is NOT a $5000 watch. And it comes only on a cheap silicone strap! Lint collector, and the 100% Exact same strap Seiko created for the (superior) SLA017. Yes a completely recycled part, a part that most people even replaced on their SLA017's because it was simply not up to quality of the watch head. The 017 did include a bracelet. But it was a subpar bracelet anyway.

[@Redonepunch]

I like how this watch looks more than their Grand Seiko dive watches but that price...I’d get a Sinn U2 and a marinemaster 300 for around that much. You can’t assume that it will be accurate because if it’s not then you’re out of luck. you have an inaccurate watch that’s within Seiko’s specs. I’ve had some lower end seiko watches that are very close to the limits of their accuracy tolerances.

[@JustBlueFish]

Two for the price of one!

[@d3xmeister]

A $5400 , Seiko, movement nowhere near COSC, no precious metals anywhere, no exotic specs (ok maybe 36000 is a bit). I wouldn’t buy this watch even if Seiko was my mother’s company

[@JustBlueFish]

Haha, hopefully mom would just give you one.

[@LostInIce4]

Better than COSC!

[@KRaikkonenSF]

Yeah compared to Tudor or the 2018 Omega Diver....that Seiko struggles to keep up.

[@mrpipps90]

It has a grand seiko movement in it...the hi-beat movements are absolutely incredible. Now I wont disagree that 5400 is a bit much. I'd love to see this watch being made in larger numbers and closer to 3000 grand.

[@grantbennett4654]

Just got mine yesterday. +1 on the timegrapher. Better than I had hoped. It is a lot of money but it was worth it for me.

[@blueshirtbuddah1665]

Another comprehensive and thorough review Guy. A very nice diver, but $5400 for a Seiko, I'll pass.

[@JustBlueFish]

Ya I knew most people would hate the price.

[@shenaneardly]

As much as I like how it looks. for that price I'd rather get the 2018 seamaster 300m instead. I could get some nice straps from the balance

[@JustBlueFish]

That’s true, they’re about the same price.

[@ridewith7480]

Id get this over omega... Bought sla039 recently...nprefer using that over my Tudors

[@strannostrannovasrr]

I would go for the SLA017. Although, in my opinion, also rather high priced.

[@JustBlueFish]

ThenSLA017 has risen in price significantly. They were $3500, and now you can’t find them for much under $6000.

[@strannostrannovasrr]

What a madness!

[@daletaylorjr.4786]

I really like this watch. If I were in the market at that price range, I’d pick it up. Also wondering if you placed it on the time grapher Guy?

[@JustBlueFish]

Ya I did, it seemed to be pretty good. Well within the -10 to +15 specifications.

[@daletaylorjr.4786]

JustBlueFish Watch Reviews I’m just a big fan of Seiko. This watch reminds me of the Marine Master 300.

[@BrianHartman]

I don't think $5,400 for that watch is reasonable. It's good that it's got a sapphire crystal, and having a monoblock case is a nice touch. But it's got nowhere near the style and sophistication of a Grand Seiko, and a rubber/silicone strap on a $5,400 watch is batshit insanity. For that kind of money, I'd expect higher-end materials. At least a bracelet. And the movement doesn't sound amazing to me, either. It's not chronometer-level, and as you noted, it's harder to regulate the movement, which would almost certainly translate into more expensive to service.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah good point I didn’t think about the service costs. I’m guessing you’re right.

[@todoroki]

A lot of haters in the comment section here due to the price point. That aside, this is in a league of its own if your are looking for a vintage style diver.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah, it is nearly Grand Seiko quality. I don't love the size/scale of the watch but it is very nicely constructed and finished.

[@todoroki]

@@JustBlueFish How's the weight? Looks like it might be on the heavy side.

[@JustBlueFish]

I don’t know the exact weight in ounces, but yeah it was kinda too heavy.

[@ahmedkambar4524]

My man, metal bracelet!!! No it’s a lot better with the silicone strap it’s signature is with silicone or rubber strap!! Overall informative video! Thank you!

[@raduruicu9037]

Nice presentation!

[@dozzie161]

It’s B/S. Company’s are calling everything limited edition, and then charging ridiculous prices. The watch looks good, but not at the tune of over 5k

[@JustBlueFish]

Pretty much true.

[@mot811]

very cool watch, but too thick, too overpriced.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@Romio666]

Was the first 200m made in 1965 a Hi-Beat too ?

[@그게-r7l]

what do you think if seiko made this watch with gold and ss bracelet so you can use it luxury or can use it like vintage with old leather strap

[@JustBlueFish]

Still too thick for me as a casual daily wear, but an interesting idea.

[@그게-r7l]

JustBlueFish Watch Reviews yeah that what i thought, should go little bit thinner.

[@Juanalcas]

it's a gorgeous watch but size, particularly the thickness, kills it for me.

[@waktosha7378]

It's a nice watch. Is just that being a Seiko, the beat of error would need to be zeroed out and reregulated, which would be a royal pain in the ass! Also the lug to lug is to big. At that price that watch needs to be at 0.0 beat of error and + or - 2 seconds a day.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah that is a concern for me too.

[@tomsterr1904]

Better choice to go with MM300 2018 model

[@JustBlueFish]

Haven’t seen that one yet.

[@Romio666]

@@JustBlueFish it is under the Prospex line. It doesn't say Marine Master on the dial.

[@Romio666]

This or the SLA039 55th anniversary, or a vintage one from 1968 ? 🤔😀

[@ed9564]

I saw this at my local AD and the case kills me, its just too chunky and weirdly proportioned to me, Im sure some people are going to love it but definitely not for me.

[@JustBlueFish]

Definitely it going to be for everyone.

[@gardehusar24]

It's gorgeous. But call me a watch nob. I will never buy a Seiko at that price point unless it's a Grand Seiko. I just can't get my head around that it's "just" a Seiko but at GS prices.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah it’s probably going to stop a lot of people because of that.

[@greenerick]

I definitely would if I could afford it doesn't draw attention to you in public nobody's going to Mug you

[@joexg50]

Thought you were from Ca. For some reason. Too big for me plus too much $ for me as well. Good review Guy.

[@JustBlueFish]

Nope not in California.

[@ripperx444]

I had the SLA017... it's came with both. The bracelet was trash. I used this strap and then once it collected dust non stop I got sick of it! Overall I wound up selling the watch and won't be buying a seiko over 1k again

[@bryce6290]

Grand seiko broke off from seiko not just because quality. They are different style. More dressy watches than sporty

[@superjfbm]

you got a new camera

[@JustBlueFish]

No same cameras.

[@superjfbm]

there's a certain glow about you

[@Romio666]

Where can I buy a vintage one from 1968 ?

[@jeffreybowden9835]

That’s a real clunk of a hockey puck. Seiko get’s something’s right but rarely the whole package.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching I appreciate it.

[@SJ-rp1pl]

Epic watch

[@kylestewart4444]

I love this watch but its way out of my price range.

[@mannysingh6618]

Go for a mm300 instead and save money!

[@JustBlueFish]

I’ve never seen a MM300 in person. They were discontinued right?

[@mannysingh6618]

@@JustBlueFish Think they are available now, albeit a bit more expensive..

[@jonnieinbangkok]

Out of the box, my $500 Seiko Prospex diver automatic is lossing less than a second a day...closer to half a second.

[@billcosgrave6232]

Beautiful watch. At the price point the movement should be chronometer grade.

[@JustBlueFish]

Agreed.

[@nicktrnka1480]

Not a bad watch, but seems over priced. Lots of more prestigious divers out there in that price range. (Oris, tudor.) The High beat is cool, but it should be accurate out of the box. It appears too much like an SKX or a turtle with upgrades than a $5000 watch. It seems closer to a 'dream option' skx, i.e. movement, sapphire crystal, etc.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@nicktrnka1480]

Also, thank you for the great content. Thoughtful comments and great production! @@JustBlueFish

[@berserkkw]

another downside, no applied Seiko logo.. while on a Tuna, you can get that..

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching.

[@berserkkw]

JustBlueFish Watch Reviews great review overall! Keep up the great work!

[@maurocardoselli6877]

This one or the new MM300 Sla021, which one is the best?

[@JustBlueFish]

Never seen the SLA021. I couldn’t say for sure.

[@Romio666]

Id rather an anniversary edition

[@zamSEG]

hello sir, nice video. i'm just curious about the monoblock case like that. are they screwfront bezel or how is it work? is it same like this watch like in this video? kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXi2gaSqrdasm5Y and one more question, what is the meaning of "polarizing" watch? thank you in the future. cheers. :)

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah I would imagine it works something like that. I’ve never taken one apart myself so I’m not totally sure. Regarding the polarizing comment. When something is polarizing that means that people generally really like it or really hate it. Like a magnet having a north and south pole, there are only two sides and no middle ground.

[@zamSEG]

@@JustBlueFish duly noted sir. thank you very much for your englightment... :)

[@WhatIsItReallyAbout]

Aaah.. the "Limited Edition". Or in other words... Artificial scarcity. Make less, bump up the price, and all your customers run like lemmings to the cliff and fall into the sea of buyers remorse.

[@JustBlueFish]

haha, funny.

[@therichardchannel]

Definitely would rather get something with spring drive

[@JustBlueFish]

Ya spring drive is very cool.

[@ridewith7480]

Will take this over submariner

[@nhayes927]

way too thick, take a few millimeters off that and a couple grand off the price and you have something

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching Charles.

[@amcluesent]

At $250 it would be expensive

[@JustBlueFish]

Nah

[@jimmymack1079]

No idea

[@peterbedrosian622]

i think the watch is to fat and the bezel is to high and there should not be any gold on a diving watch good video anyway keep up the good work you have very enjoyable videos

[@jeffreyfranco6411]

There are SO many better pieces at this price level. Just not worth the cash.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching I appreciate it.

[@thezzz8]

Just envy

[@privateinfo4820]

Good lord.. never EVER would I drop 5k on a Seiko ..

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching Jeff!

[@Sclavus]

Tooooo expensiiiiive

[@gmshadowtraders]

I tried this at my Seiko Boutique... so beautiful but felt like I was wearing a saucepan on my wrist. Could have been perfect... oh well, i'll just stick to my SLA017 :)

[@JustBlueFish]

You have an 017? That’s awesome I really like the look of that watch.

[@gmshadowtraders]

@@JustBlueFish I didn't even look at the near $5k price tag on the SLA017, soon as I saw it in the window I knew I had to have it. Will never sell it. Possibly bar an exceptional Rolex it's to me the best diver for the price ever. And Seiko won't make another quality sub-40mm watch of this sort again I feel. If you can get your hands on one I wouldn't hesitate.

[@Romio666]

@@gmshadowtradersIn 2020, they released the SLA037 Hi-Beat and the SLA043 55th anniversary of the 62MAS

[@gmshadowtraders]

@@Romio666 Yes bro, since I wrote that post Seiko have diluted the name of the 62MAS by releasing literally dozens of these re-interpretations lololol. I still think the original SLA017 was the best being the closest to the original. The 037 is fantastic being hi-beat, but it's even thicker at 14.7mm! And I also tried on the SLA043 but the damn thing was misaligned on the bezel. Typical Seiko....

[@Romio666]

@@gmshadowtraders I got the high beat SLA037 at 30% discount from the boutique and I am very happy with it. I highly prefer this amazing shade of blue over the Grey SLA017. May be because I also have a dolphin grey MM300 SLA045. I also like the 55th anniversary box. I think the vintage 62MAS was also Hi-Beat, isn't it ? I wear the SLA037 in office, it's not too thick.