The ChatGPT Scam

[@esotericvv1244]

i love how they always use the "it's for the kids" defense when they are making a power play move to violate your privacy

[@myce-liam]

Welcome to the managed decline of your rights and privacy.

[@h.e.pennypacker4728]

Its more than just privacy, they lean on that for many political motivations.

[@dertythegrower]

Always call that one out... the one side (joe's) loves to use that for the children thing... there is a famous meme from Nancy Pelosi always using that "for the children!" card. and its not even close to accurate...

[@dertythegrower]

Nancy Pelosi and Joe sure love using that excuse when it has little to do with that, they use it to get the soccer moms to repeat their bias.

[@dertythegrower]

Nancy Pelosi was famous for using that 'for the children' excuse card... do NOT let the elites use that on you for their auto-replies... always call them out on it.

[@gnif]

The exe padding isn't to make it "seem more legit", it's to make the file too large to submit to online scanning services like virus total.

[@Seytonic]

Quite right, though it definitely makes it look more legit in my books

[@sockraltiltemper5402]

​@ArticleSand2 no it's just repeating the same data over and over. Doesn't take a genius to do.

[@gnif]

@@sockraltiltemper5402 the idea/concept is smart and it takes advantage of the fact that a repeating sequence of bytes will compress extremely well keeping the download itself small, but the AV software will give up trying to scan the containing file because it's beyond it's default (or maximum in some cases) upper file size limit.

[@drlaserr]

VirusTotal's maximum file upload size is 650MB, that .exe file is 300MB.

[@gnif]

@@drlaserr But what is the maximum file size it will unzip in a compressed archive? Also note I stated "like virus total", there are other services that have lower limits on the upload file size, and even your locally installed AV software may have upper limits on the size of files it will background scan.

[@MyurrDurr]

Any time, anything proposes by politicians or government etc etc is claiming to "Protect the children", its just a shady excuse for more privacy breaking BS :/

[@sheogorathboon8256]

Thing is criminals will not use mainstream communication apps anyway so the new legislation is pointless, criminals get around the blockade and innocents get spied on

[@MyurrDurr]

@@sheogorathboon8256 Yep ://

[@Linkario86]

Yeah in Switzerland they actualy want you to identify yourself with an official ID for various kind of websites. Not just porn or online casinos and stuff like that. No ANYTHING that can play video, so youtube, vimeo and also other types of websites. Joke is it can be easily bypassed by a VPN. Guess the reason: "To protect our children and youth".

[@boslyporshy6553]

Why stop when everyone eats it up and wants more?

[@chara5]

"Protect the children" is always a lie they use when doing something which actively hurts the children (and everyone else too) I have no clue how anybody falls for it.

[@AshnSilvercorp]

_We need your information to protect the children. We've got it safe and secure._ _Uh, you're literally getting breached right now._

[@Sky4Jus]

Btw, we don't care

[@Dracula.25]

@@Sky4Jus speak for yourself

[@oblozs10]

@@Sky4Jus by we do you mean your self?

[@orangejuliaa]

is that profile picture a rain world reference??

[@boslyporshy6553]

Is it a breach if its for your defense?

[@powerdust015lastname4]

6:28 this is also being discussed in germany for the last couple of months. that "spy clause" is a really bad idea in my opinion, because that government backdoor would definitely be bombarded with attacks by mallicous actors making encryption entirely obsolete.

[@tonysolar284]

Strip, strip, strip your rights away, slowly but surly.

[@SuperPerry1000]

Tom Scott quite literally did a video on this years ago, laying out all the very, VERY bad things people could do. Not even hackers, just people with a grudge. The Bitter Ex Test, he called it.

[@itsTyrion]

you won't catch pedophiles except for the extra stupid ~~top~~ flop 5%. There are more than enough open source projects with sufficient security. Even if we ignore those, someone with a bit of programming knowledge can make their own basic chat app. Did that few years ago, in Java. 4096b RSA and 256b AES-CBC (or was it GCM?) over a span of 2-3 days, most of it being not coding but research about Java GUIs and encryption (algorithms, blockcipher modes, common pitfalls).

[@Tie509]

The government IS the 'bad actor'.

[@kenosabi]

Yep and considering how incompetent they are currently at maintaining their own systems I've got some serious reservations about them "securing" anything of mine. The a ssholes are supposed to secure my rights and they've yet to do that.

[@collectorguy3919]

Weaponizing the existence of CSAM to manipulate opinions about encryption is just sick. We can agree, CSAM is really bad! Law enforcement scanning every message from innocent people is only going to cause distrust, and for good reason. CSAM is a money-making enterprise. Pursue them!! Stop trying to infiltrate into ordinary people's lives. Sowing distrust has consequences, and then we're all worse off.

[@RichardHarlos]

Collector Guy wrote, _"Law enforcement scanning every message from innocent people is only going to cause distrust, and for good reason."_ True. I would add that a concern over 'causing distrust' is maybe too little of a consideration in the bigger picture. In the bigger picture, I think it makes sense to consider whether 'public distrust' matters at all. Two lines of thought here: 1. Psychology and sociology suggest that people -- _individually and collectively_ -- tend not to respond en masse to simply violations of ethics. This is generally true, but it's especially true when the violation doesn't confront them directly. A data breach to most non-tech people is just a factoid. It's almost guaranteed that non-techies don't pay attention to such things, and the ones who do end up hearing about it probably don't go out changing passwords right away. To them, it's too abstract and, in their opinion, not particularly relevant to their concerns. The heuristic seems to be something like, _"If I can get up tomorrow and mostly do what I expected to do, then nothing else matters."_ 2. History suggests that even when people do begin to take notice of an issue, there's often such a polarized view about that matter that rather than people uniting ini solidarity against the power, instution, government, etc., that's responsible for that issue... the people just end up bickering amongst themselves. It's the ages-old tactic of 'divide and rule', and it's ages-old for a reason: it's proven tot be both reliable and effective. All that said, I think it's more useful (for those of us who are actually paying attention) to recognize the illegitimacy of existing power structures. I think it was one of the Rothschilds who said, _"Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."_ That's a relevant insight to how power operates. So, if we who are paying attention are serious about safeguarding our liberty, privacy, etc., then it seems to me we need to go further back in the 'chain of events' to address the root-cause of such problems. Because unless we do that, the endless stream of 'current events' that catch our attention only serve to distract us from going back to the *ROOT* cause of society's ills. I think this characterization is correct. As to whether it's likely that the masses will every grow out of their obsession with -polarized bickering', I doubt that they will. And the conclusions we may draw from this premise are as disappointing as they are disheartening because, if I'm thinking about it correctly, then it seems inevitable that the ills of society will continue either until power succeeds in a full-scale tyranny, or until the society collapses under the weight of its own agenda to own and control everything and everyone. I suppose time will tell whether what I'm thinking is correct, and whether things will unfold as I suspect. This is one case where I hope I'm wrong but... right now, I don't think that's likely to be true.

[@CoasterMan13Official]

It's not going to happen, because in America, this is unconstitutional according to the 4th amendment.

[@RichardHarlos]

@@CoasterMan13Official wrote, _"...this is unconstitutional according to the 4th amendment."_ What specifically are you referring to as unconstitutional?

[@raymondeldred977]

​@@RichardHarlos do you know anything about this that you're talking about or do I not know anything about what I'm talking about??

[@RichardHarlos]

@@raymondeldred977 wrote, _"do you know anything about this that you're talking about or do I not know anything about what I'm talking about??"_ I'm not in the habit of talking about things unless I know something about them. Since I wrote several paragraphs in reply to others in this thread, I don't know what, specifically, you're referring to when you use the word _"this."_ Also, since I don't see any comments from you prior to you asking me this question, I have no idea what you're talking about. In light of these points, it appears that you've replied to me by mistake.

[@retinapeg1846]

Girlfriend? get back to the terminal.

[@teaboy9614]

lmao

[@Seytonic]

Plot twist, my girlfriend is Bing Chat.

[@retinapeg1846]

@@Seytonic Only five messages allowed a day now xoxo ;)

[@ij9375]

​@@Seytonic 😭

[@midimusicforever]

They don't care about children. It's all about control.

[@billklatsch5058]

Well it actually is since all the ppl they target are children of someone...

[@photlam9769]

​@@billklatsch5058That cna be solved with restriction the parent enforces, if you so much as weaken that privacy, everyone suffers

[@larrythehedgehog]

Its crazy how the fines are no longer slaps on the wrist when they want to spy on you.

[@AntonioNoack]

It's also awful how they have a lower limit for the fine. Oh, your company just has 50 workers? We'll bankrupt it.

[@anteshell]

@@AntonioNoack Except that there isn't. Or at least I couldn't find anything else than this: "A penalty must be of an amount that OFCOM consider to be appropriate, and proportionate to the failure (or failures) in respect of which it is imposed." On page 228 of the bill.

[@AntonioNoack]

@@anteshell oh yeah, I potentially misunderstood @8:09, where he reads it. But that's the maximum penalty, so the company might be luckier.

[@anteshell]

@@AntonioNoack Yeah, you misunderstood alright. But no worries. It happens to all of us sometimes.

[@FirestarWarriorCats1]

@@anteshell You are a good person for admitting that everyone makes a mistake, some kids just insult people for misunderstanding a tiny detail. Props to you.

[@Player_X_YT2]

Considering signal is 100% open source it would be near impossible to stop this from the app as anyone can recompile and redistribute it without the scanner

[@mysteryY2K]

Session is a good alternative

[@JustMe-ui9bv]

And what is your point? Session would have the same exact "problem".

[@jan_Sanku]

matrix. make your own client, join a trusted server or host your own, etc

[@schoepro]

Fun fact: apple didnt stop their image scanning project, the just rolled it out silently

[@pluto9000]

How do you know?

[@plixplux]

Got a source?

[@alarioderpp_control000aa9]

the sheer amount of apple d riders

[@dafoex]

I heard this, too. It boiled down to running some form of firewall snitch and finding that an interesting URL was being accessed by the system photos app

[@itsTyrion]

source

[@Ozzy4201]

I think youre the only youtuber i sub to, where I always instantly click on the notifications when i get them.

[@Seytonic]

Thanks :))

[@tonysolar284]

If only the hackers could have found out where the 6 trillion dollars lost by the pentagon went off to and why the pentagon keeps failing audits.

[@omegaduck2955]

“Lost”

[@John-ei8wq]

Huh yeah weird

[@kenosabi]

@@omegaduck2955 lost right into the pockets of the cabal

[@kenosabi]

Hey now. That sounds like a micro aggression by a dOmEsTic TerRoriSt . 🤦‍♂️

[@tonysolar284]

@@kenosabi I'm just pointing out the obvious. The truth scares the wicked.

[@Mightydoggo]

Just a little side note: We don´t need to guess how wrong the "save the children" approach can go in practice: Germany just got unhinged in prosecuting uh... possession of explicit material involving persons of not appropriate age, I guess, lately and they completely fell on the face. Their court system is getting flooded with automated requests from America and other countries rn and because they decided to turn the possession of such material from an offense into a crime, courts cannot legally decide against making a full public case out of it, *even if it´s entirely clear from the beginning that it is a false flag from an automated system.* The massive influx of cases stalled all the major actual cases (often including abuse as well) effectively stopping the prosecution while also turning people that tried to *stop* the distribution of such material (like teachers who took away a phone) into (suspected) criminals. This is what happens when you try to turn hollow phrases into actual law. This situation probably won´t change until highest court reevaluated the whole according paragraph, which is suspected to be against the constitution anyways. (As if authorities would actually care about the constitution. lol)

[@Muffboy1]

Agreed. It's essentially the equivalent of prohibition.

[@beepboop-o5s]

@@Muffboy1 right. prohibition doesnt work. hanging pedo's in the town square and making a cultural spectacle of letting kids stone the bodies. that would work.

[@garneet]

literally just clicked the home page to go to bed and i see this man

[@fusionsid270]

lmao same bro

[@whamer100]

this is how he gets us

[@Clip_It1]

Sameee

[@lezlienewlands1337]

Encryption backdoors are a nice idea on paper. Until the backdoor is abused by overreaching governments and then discovered by hackers and other countries as well. Tom Scott has done a video on the topic and I think the rewards just don't justify the risk.

[@boslyporshy6553]

To what extent do you want security in your hands?

[@AnarchoTak]

they aren't even a nice idea on paper. having a encryption backdoor always makes encryption broken

[@beepboop-o5s]

@@boslyporshy6553 completely. if you cant make it, you shouldnt. real life is about the law of nature. protection = decline

[@gnif]

It should be noted too that the Apple service you mentioned did see the light of day, and IIRC it's still in use today. During COVID lockdowns it became public because a parent was falsely flagged when they sent photos of their sick child to a doctor for a diagnosis. Some simple searching will turn this up.

[@josephs3973]

I think it was Google (Gmail), not Apple. So Google already does this also, and this has happened at least twice (publicly, at least). In both cases it was a false flag and in both cases users lost their access to their Google account forever, without recourse or an option to get their own stuff out.

[@gnif]

@@josephs3973 Yes but if you read the articles posted about it, especially the one by Verge, it states clearly that Apple just postponed the release.

[@OcteractSG]

@@gnif After Apple announced end-to-end encryption for iCloud, they said they are abandoning the CSAM scanning idea.

[@homuraakemi1017]

Kinda weird for a doctor to be asking for boy penis pictures to "diagnose"

[@TheColinputer]

I believe that was actually because Google photos had uploaded the photos in the background to the cloud without the person knowing.

[@Zacian2.0]

Signal: Gives absolute privacy Goverments: No, dont do that. We want to spy on our citizens

[@coronaphone710]

Signal promises a lot, but not the phone itself which runs in under Signal

[@beepboop-o5s]

signal is a scam, just liek protonmail, just like telegram all three have cooperated with zionist governments.

[@RTPTechTips]

The more covering these problems the better. Good video.

[@macjonte]

There are so many scams as Facebook ads. They seriously need to do something about that. It’s a new one every day.

[@ethisfreedom]

nah fb is busy selling personal data of his users

[@macjonte]

@@ethisfreedom Yep. While earning advertise money on scams. And why are we there again? 😄

[@inund8]

Legit, the only thing that can protect child safety is good parenting. Breaking encryption fixes nothing.

[@sammyjones8279]

Yeah. First thing that comes to mind to me as a *survivor* of CSA is how the anonymity of the internet was one of my only ways out of the situation I was in... Any amount of power to break privacy will put kids in *more* danger, not less

[@TheUnknownCatWarrior]

Note: Malware files are filled with zeros so people can't just upload it to a online file analyzer tool due to the 100 megabytes cap.

[@fizipcfx]

Best part is the downloaded "lisence" file. XD

[@TornTech1]

quite funny that the discussion about encrypted messaging apps is happening, while at the same time the media is swarming over leaked messages from the Ex Health Secretary lol

[@myce-liam]

It's always a colorful, dramatic week in the world of cyber-security/tech news. Thanks Seytonic 🤩

[@nixielee]

Apple are scanning their hearts out, they didn't stop with that plan, only tweaked it a little.

[@MajesticBlueFalcon]

I wish Seytonic would narrate the news, any type of news. He could never bore me.

[@river1711]

The uk: tries to ban signal Also the uk: increasing support for the Ukraine where they use signal for coms

[@blunderingfool]

UK gov is cheating on us with Ukraine so, you know... nothing new here.

[@junior_thomas]

Saw the ads 3weeks ago tried to report it but i kept on seeing the ad again(on facebook)

[@Trizzer89]

Putting a malware on CP will almost certainly eventually reach the FBI.

[@beepboop-o5s]

thats actually the best way to hack talmudic feds

[@petersuvara]

The funny thing is, neural networks can easily be fooled by getting things wrong when checking images.

[@youreyesarebleeding1368]

Correction: Apple brought back scanning of files, and now scans all files on your system EVEN if you don't have icloud enabled. They waited for the backlash to die down, then slipped it in.

[@Seytonic]

Can you link me to that? I'm not aware of them bringing it back.

[@PiniiXever]

​@@Seytonic it's true, don't have the link rn but definitely read about it

[@bensondentalassociates8690]

@@Seytonic it’s true.

[@StaceyAyodele]

@@PiniiXever If you don't have a source, it's just hearsay and cannot be trusted as fact.

[@fivr.]

@@bensondentalassociates8690 source: it was revealed to me in a dream

[@eliasdargham]

The people who usually say: “It’s for the kids” are the people who we must protect our kids from.

[@shadowdemonaer]

Say it louder.

[@a-s-greig]

"Oh, ok... But they better not laugh."

[@beepboop-o5s]

this is so obvious in the world right now. literally people saying that grooming kids is helping them. or that taking their parents guns away is protecting them. all demons

[@Valcuda]

Remember, the phrase "It's for the children" is code word for "Don't question this, else you'll look like an asshole"

[@benji_bon]

i am absolutely not surprised at the chat GPT scams.

[@pwntrackdev]

Girlfriend ? Nah get back on the terminal soldier

[@tonysolar284]

The white hat who found the open server, is now on the list and under surveillance due to him entering the server.

[@OramiIT]

It depends on how it was reported. Go through another entity to hide your identity or a lawyer.

[@tonysolar284]

@@OramiIT hmm, good point.

[@DerSolinski]

Here is a fun idea, let's publicize the contents of every bank vault. I wonder how many CP is stored there... or dirt on politicians. After all it's for the kids, isn't it?

[@ICircuit64]

I really hope that CP FBI server wasnt directly targeted and especially not for its contents.

[@mysteryY2K]

conveniently deleting Effery Jepsteins files

[@SECYBERSAFE]

Wow, many people would defintely fall for this and download this stuff

[@Flappy9]

If I have to hear "think of the children" from the people who flew to Epstein's island one more time...

[@boslyporshy6553]

Its something of a testament to how well they know the people if it keeps working. A heart warming tale from another end.

[@davidyoder5890]

Artificially inflating the file size has less to do with increasing legitimacy and has more to do with bypassing or postponing AV engines from scanning the file.

[@nate5701]

Thankfully tech companies actually standing up to the bill. For now at least

[@lephtovermeet]

Banning signal in the UK... Hahaha. Oi, you got loicence for that private communication mate? What a failed joke of a state. Orwell is truly rolling in his grave.

[@beautifulcrazy]

Omg why can software engineers not work out security systems that stop this

[@jokbeatz]

Question..How can credentials stored in browsers can be accessed by the malware? i mean, if i want to check the credentials in chrome i have to put in my password, and with safari i need to use the fingerprint to access keychain, or the settings..i always assumed that they where encrypted until you used your password to reveal it..if you are in windows you just click "yes" to give admin permission to the installer, but you are not using any pasword in most cases. can please someone with better understanding clarify this to me?

[@benni5541]

My guess is that inside the browser all credentials are protected from eachother by sandboxing and only beeing accessible by the set root domain. IF you install software under windows and do that with administrator priviliges like 90%+ of all personal computers, the installer has effectivly root access unless data is stored in some kind of trusted platform module.

[@chri-k]

My guess is, the malware waits for you to type the password in and just copies it from the browser’s memory. I am not familiar with Windows’s privilege system whatsoever, so i can’t say how they actually manage to get to monitor another process.

[@fss1704]

As the man said, they wait for you to type your password.

[@scottbanks4906]

It amazes me how quickly KZbin censors it's creator contents but allows scam adds to continue for extremely long time periods.

[@MajorBorris]

"They should have used chat GPT" 😅

[@gamereditor59ner22]

The first part of video something sound suspicious when bad actor make a webpage.

[@vedranb87]

Should probably add that artificially inflated files are not solely to appear more legit, but some antivirus solutions can't, or won't, scan files above a certain size. Though I think the most common limit nowadays is around 650-700MB

[@thenewaeon]

The FBI forgot to change the default login credentials for the wireless router admin page.

[@bradleyostmann9197]

Why isn't Facebook being held accountable for not removing the ads?

[@sonosus]

I get a lot of ads on KZbin for fake ChatGPT apps as well

[@Seytonic]

Wow, I didn't know it was that bad

[@deezeemb]

Telegram already started scanning regular "private" messages (not the end-to-end encrypted ones, altho not sure), because it now automatically restricts users for sharing certain links, despite those users not having been reported by the recipient who actually asked for the link.

[@fss1704]

No wonder seeing how many spambots try to contact you trough telegram

[@deezeemb]

@@fss1704 And we used to report those spammers. But now we can't even share links our friends ask us for without risk of getting restricted??? I would much rather receive more spam and manually report it like I used to, than have to wonder if or when Telegram's stupid monitoring AI will decide the link I shared was spam and punish me for it, even when I was literally asked for it. Besides, if they're doing that, how can they call Telegram a privacy chat app? It's true the spam problem has become severe on Telegram recently, but this is not the solution...

[@fss1704]

@@deezeemb Definetly, spam accounts always find ways to bypass the system while the users get penalized.

[@DC-Nigma]

virus over 300 mb cant be check with virus total thats why the file is so big

[@probablyhades]

If WhatsApp and iMessage (and any other major apps in the UK) both said they would walk as well it could probably be enough to stop the bill.

[@cherubin7th]

UK turns out to be a monarchy not a democracy.

[@logangraham2956]

XD they filled the file up with ascii '0' 30 = '0'

[@stavros222]

They couldn't write the number 0? There would be no change unless virus total knows how to ignore fake bytes. This is the most classic way to fill an app. You just put random s**t in the middle of the instructions.

[@gus1755]

Ah yes a “local version of chatgpt”, definitely wouldn’t explode my pc

[@mgames1710]

1:50 I spit my water laughing when I read "lisence" 😂

[@TheyLuvJokester]

2:55 rip bozo + ratio + imagine + l + pushing p + YB better

[@turbojuusto7153]

they make it over 300 megs because most of the online virus scanners do not scan files bigger than 300 megs. like googles for example :) nice vid btw

[@StirsMYCookiez]

The padding isn't to make it more "legit" - its so AntiVirus Scanners skip over such a large file.

[@frag0638]

Probably using google drive for hosting because they're cheap and it's free bandwidth so that too

[@samsoncooper1]

The online safety bill needs shelving

[@kukukachu]

If you ever want to get something passed, just bring up the "safety" of the children....it's a tried and true method that has been used time and again to get the desired result that politicians and such want.

[@beepboop-o5s]

only with women voting.

[@kukukachu]

@@beepboop-o5s any blinded empath really

[@ActualDarkness]

I literally got a fake chat gpt advertisement while clicking this video

[@BodybuildingNews]

You do realize Apple is still scanning devices, they just do it now on the hardware instead of the cloud… mental outlaw has a video on it

[@danbrit9848]

you dont get it thay want the wording to be slightly jankie ...if you dont catch it then your an easyer mark

[@deangreenhough3479]

Never place your trust in the Government. Nothing is done for our safety, ever.

[@henryfleischer404]

Ever hear of the FDA? They do SOME things for safety. That does not mean they are trustworthy though.

[@hedgehog3180]

The problem with everything relating to child abuse is never a lack of evidence but that police are incompetent and don't listen to victims. Like talk to literally any victim or go onto any forum for victims and you'll see endless stories about victims going to the police and being dismissed or even facing verbal abuse and even if an investigation does happen and it does go to court it's rare that anything comes from it regardless of the amount of victim testimonials or other evidence. Child protective services are often equally incompetent and will do nothing when there's clear evidence of abuse such as bruises or mental trauma and will often just protect the abuser. If you want to actually do something about it you should start with firstly making sure that police actually listen to victims and treat them with respect and actually try to fucking do something about it. Then updates laws around sexual assault to actually be based on consent rather than arbitrary measures like "use of force" which is literally impossible to prove unless you have video evidence. And finally start properly addressing rape culture by teaching consent in school and stop treating children as if they're the property of their parents. Like right now we're in a ridiculous situation where getting justice is usually a bigger risk for the victim than it is for the criminal. Victims have to go out of hiding and go through an incredibly stressful process and often reveal incredibly private information, spending months or years on the process, just for nothing to happen. Even though you can have multiple trained experts testify as to the reliability of the victim and that they also believe something happened. Someone is probably gonna make a bad faith argument accusing me of wanting to overturn "innocent until proven guilty" or something but literally the only thing I'm asking for is for the cases to be properly investigated and done so in a manner where the victim can be sure that they don't take a major risk by reporting what happened. You aren't going to catch anyone if the victims are too scared to come forward because reporting is massive and mostly pointless risk to take. On that note it'd also be a good idea if there was actual support for victims, like just the kind of basic healthcare we'd expect to exist in all other situations. Because right now unless your trauma came from being a veteran in most countries there is essentially no treatment of any kind available, and it's not even like veterans have an easy time here.

[@fujster]

6:48 I get the argument of this is threatening privacy, yeah sure, it is but its not setting precedent, lets be honest, signal is used basically (other than cybersec heads) solely for illegal of which a good portion are CP. theres huge proof and precedent for that btw not just a guess,

[@lfcbpro]

When a ransomware starts does it encrypt every hard drive connected to the comp, or does it just do the C: drive? Would it encrypt attached storage, such as USB drives?

[@takipsizad]

depends on the malware

[@julius4858]

I don’t know any ransomware specifics, but theoretically nothing is safe. I guess most of them will encrypt all drives.

[@fss1704]

They encrypt even SMB drives, a mass storage has no chance of not being encrypted.

[@MattMzansi]

Shows how wonderful the approval process with Facebook ads is.

[@mkDaniel]

300MB would be too low. This Is size of languages model made specially to enhance prompts fór image generator. Nothing more.

[@stage6fan475]

What does it mean that hackers and scammers are endlessly creative and energetic while governments are plodding clowns?

[@hugogonzalez1749]

It means nerds live to hack and bureaucrats just want to get paid and go home.

[@felicityc]

that's just real life

[@boslyporshy6553]

Light things are nimble.

[@lemaghribi]

Private companies versus public ones.

[@somekid8311]

its weird how unbiased this guy is

[@ame367]

This was a very good video, very informative!

[@AskieFox-i2b]

There’s even chat got ads here in youtube

[@traditur_]

Only some of the more simple things will be automated be A.I and likely only one A.I will be used for that position instead of AGI working all systems as A.I solve times are not linear, they are exponential, as with the limits of digital computing. Quantum computing may offer a temporary solution, however we’d likely run into the same issue of exponential solve times eventually. A.I such as ChatGPT will not remain free, and with their speed decreasing with complexity, I predict they will fall out of popularity, or perhaps it will inspire competition in the free market. Now that would be exciting!

[@henryfleischer404]

Why the hell was A government server with CP on it connected to the internet at all?

[@D.von.N]

I must be getting old, for not jumping on every new thing that appears on the market. I even noticed Tiktok with quite some delay and had no urge to download it. The more I learned about it, the more I got convinced, it was for my good. The same with Chat GPT, whtever it is, however it works, and all stuff related. I didn't need it until now, I can happily carry on without it for the future.

[@coronaphone710]

The whole 'art' making idea with a.i. is so stupid and lazy. And a lot of other stuff... But hey I'm getting old The generation who grew up with smart phone are a completely different breed of people, they all act like tv hosts.

[@crazyyt2099]

Everybody wants to get money, BUT.... everybody wants to scam to get money, which kids can get scammed too, that also gives a reason why kids don't see PC in their life

[@johetajava]

Just don't give phones to kids, it's that simple.

[@RonaldTrumpOfficial]

Thanks boris Johnson, here to protect our kids again.. from not having privacy

[@coolsonic8982]

I dont understand why apps like signal cant analyse the images sent in-app before encrypting them. And notify the government in case of a case of CP... I dont understand this trade of between end-to-end encryption and surveillance

[@dominiquedoeslife]

Oh god…end-to-end encryption is SO important. This is awful.

[@PakistanIcecream000]

Which country is the first scam you're talking about coming from: Romania, India, Germany or Norway?

[@Nerosii]

This info needs to spread rapidly

[@dashermorgan]

Being that this video is about security, I would have thought you would have advertised something like Norton instead of Linode. 😂

[@NithinJune]

6:40 What if all the CSAM scanning happens locally??

[@cate01a]

hella misleading. thought this might be a video critisising openai for saying theyre open but then becoming increasingly "closed" and shady

[@spiritualdownunder8274]

They also create scripts and figure out how to scam people, use it to make ads for them, alot more then anyone would think, this world is about to change.

[@3rd.Eye.Saw.Destruction]

Joe Biden loves you

[@NithinJune]

7:21 Yes absolutely you can be sure because software like signal is 100% open source

[@mrnice88x]

If it was truly about the children, why would the cover up a certain island and all the political people involved?

[@crispy-k]

Meanwhile we can't even get the list from Maxwell (epstein island customers).

[@vnc.t]

Linux users be like: I have no such weaknesses

[@michaelpontiac7467]

Remember what happened to Blackberry when they told the government ,"No". Where are they now?

[@andersonsystem2]

There is lots of fake chatGPT ads and apps