Just imagine Animal starts streaming on Netflix and Netflix calls Dhruv to review the Film.
@HarneetOberoi Жыл бұрын
Oops 🫢
@kapilsaini949 Жыл бұрын
Moi moi ho jayega
@punisherwarlord Жыл бұрын
he will promote it... he is such kind of shameless
@inderjitsidhu360111 ай бұрын
It is on Netflix now
@ChineseExperiment78610 ай бұрын
He'll reject it any of cost❤️🔥
@ZiqrbySha Жыл бұрын
I wish Dhruv could make a similar video about the toxicity in series and movies like 'Thank you for coming' and 'Four more shots' but we all know he won't since it doesn't fit on his political ideology
@UnDonnaiolo Жыл бұрын
Yes
@shivamgusain5185 Жыл бұрын
@@Let_me_cook31woh isliye hit nhi hui kyunki un series ki koi story hi nhi hai.
@smriti220 Жыл бұрын
@@Let_me_cook31 n there u went wrong. Boys knows the animal character where he is wrong or right. Jaise Neha dhupia ki baat me akalmand ladkiya agree nhi kra tha to yaha ladke galat ko promote nhi kr rhe they just enjoying the mass action, stylish movie n coolness that's it. I'm being a girl, a wife too ,loved this movie. Jahan galat laga wo galat laga jahan accha lga wo accha laga. That's it finished kuch nhi uske baad. Baat itna bhadhana kyu. Film dekh liya bs utna hi uspe itna sochna kyu. Ab jo jayda sochega wo insaan hi problematic hai. Usse har dusre teesre film me influence hona hoga.
@TechnoGin Жыл бұрын
@@Let_me_cook31log logically sahi aur galat me frk jaante h, sbko pta h murder, khoon khraaba glt h. To kyu gyaan chodna
@SJ...... Жыл бұрын
I don't think anybody even watches this shit shows n movies..
@mahirkhanpathan7583 Жыл бұрын
Since i saw dhruvs video, i knew his opinion was one sided and biased but the way u broke down his narrative and psychology behind is very detailed. Well done!
@Rrohit_tombbat33 Жыл бұрын
Same here
@ameykazo4194 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money. I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker. If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services. Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
@MakeBoY Жыл бұрын
Damn true!! Dhruv needs to watch this
@bullishboi Жыл бұрын
Not just movie reviews all the videos related politics also highly biased,
@mahirkhanpathan7583 Жыл бұрын
@@bullishboi u meant biased?
@tnisha12893aravinda5 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv Rathee clearly stated violence and evil characters should be shown in a particular way and not in a heroic way. There is no redemption in Animal movie or Kabir Singh, they remain hero till the end which is why it makes it toxic. Dirty picture is dirty too but Vidya balan is not shown in a good light. No body will be inspired by what she played on screen bcoz the grey lines was reflected subtly through the movie.So good and evil characters need to have it's own consequences. We should not glamorize toxic characters that's what Dhruv said.
@manasghosh54386 ай бұрын
have you even seen those 2 movies, if yes then i can't say anything coz you're dumb. and dont watch something which you cant digest
@Raj14-o9y6 ай бұрын
In gangs of wasseypur, sardar Khan and Faisal are shown in a heroic way. Thousands of reels copied from their dialogue
@Mkeyline_1126 ай бұрын
@@Raj14-o9y but by the end, they suffer due to this attitude and actions as well. Sardar Khan dies, Faizal Khan cried in a scene saying" I never wanted to get involved in this" and was killed by his own step brother. Nagma was killed, Durga betrayed Sardar. Ramadhir was killed by Faizal. They all suffered in the end
@Raj14-o9y6 ай бұрын
@@Mkeyline_112 I see reels on disgusting dialogues from mirzapur
@binodtharu49135 ай бұрын
@@Mkeyline_112 Didn't Ranvijay Singh suffer in the end? His whole body got damaged. His sense of taste/smell vanished. His sister is widow now. 2 of his brothers got killed by Aziz. His wife left him. His dad jiske liye vo itna pagal tha, pata chalta hai he is diagnosed with cancer and only few months are left until he is dead. His whole family has been destroyed. To add more to that, there is Aziz now who has cloned Ranvijay's face and now burning in fire of revenge and is ready to destory his whole lineage and wants to capture Swastik Enterprises. He used to feel bad about his father not giving enough time to him. But eventually vo bhi aisa hi baap ban gaya hai end me jo apni family ko zara sa bhi time nahi de raha hai. Itna suffer karna kaafi nahi hai tunhare liye.
@shudhanshurai5538 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv bhai is absolutrely right I watched Cars movie as a kid and now I'm a car vroom vroom !!!
@themboys304 Жыл бұрын
😂
@GamerFlicky Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@ankitdas2191 Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@abhishekthakur5823 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@randomdude13432 Жыл бұрын
I'm also influenced by Stuart little, now I'm a mouse😢
@slayingswordrxrr1377 Жыл бұрын
Coming from a Dhruv rathee subscriber, this is a well researched and unbaised reply... Well done Shan..
@PawanRao007 Жыл бұрын
Bow Bow gang !!
@vedjoshi260 Жыл бұрын
@@purpleblackberries6850 Not all films are made as reflection of society😂. Films take huggggge creative liberty thus making them fictious. Sabse ameer aadmi ko goli lage na toh Desh ki saree police udhar lg jaygi, aur poore film mein ek bhi police nhi hai, 1 of the many facts that prove this film is nowhere reflection of society
@chiraglakhani5385 Жыл бұрын
I have seen both videos , and both are biased. Both have done well researched and point out their Targeted portion. Dhruv Pick up Munnu and went through his oife time journey, he didn't say that munnu watch this film But he said munnu face some similar incidents in his child life then as a adult he watch this film , that create an impact on his mind. Yes some people don't influence but some people influence by elvish yadav as well. Shan can't guarantee that no one influenced by ANIMAL. Dhruv Rathi's narrative was more right because he also said that Some people only may influence but it create a big impact as a part of domino effect, If 10cr people will watch the movie and 0.0025% people influenced then the number is 2500 Out of them 10% will start crime then it's 250 criminals. So both are right in their opinion Shan is talking about remain 9.999 cr Dhruv is talking about that 2500
@junayedalam8463 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv should say something on Toxic feminism movies/series like 4 more shots Tnx for coming dear zindagi Made in haven jee karda lipstick under virgin vanupria bobby begum
@phoenixj1299 Жыл бұрын
You should be ashamed of your existence for subscribing to one of the delutarded youtubers. Shame...shame ....shame Edit: Add some value to your life by doing something useful
@erenjaeger1553 Жыл бұрын
-Wife and kid left him - Father is about to die - Almost half of bones in his body are broken - A psycho is after him to Butcher his family Without being sympathetic vanga is shown how every action has consequences. He didn't justify any of his act.
@SuperRomi1411 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely. Great points.
@shreyaranjan400 Жыл бұрын
Yes but there are people who r defending the character. They are soo ignorant about the fact that Ranbir character is problematic. It's the audience that are defending the characters and those who are pointing out the wrong things that shown in the movie are said that they are fake feminist. Seriously people need to grow up
@MrBlack-qb6ev Жыл бұрын
@@shreyaranjan400non of this feminist shows this point that bro share they actually called Sandeep vanga biggot mysoginy or woman abuser that's why they are feminist God just forgot to give brain to them 😂😂
@arundhati_de Жыл бұрын
But the character of Vijay didn't have any redemption arc despite suffering the consequences. That's why it's wrong. Because, the movie glorifies it.
@sujitparida2501 Жыл бұрын
Exactly....nd same was with kabir singh...reddy very cleverly shows that his charatrs have flaws nd because of these flaws his charactrs face terrible consequences...in kabir singh literally his license was revoked in the end...people just dont get this
@roazi233 Жыл бұрын
But I'm disagree with that point says films don't change society. These things happen gradually so you can't see but if you analysis you can see
@2kdwalapro25411 ай бұрын
Really film doesn't change the society, agr aisa hota to money heist dekhkr sb chori krne lgte , Spiderman dekhkr sab building se kudte.. pr logo ko reality pta hoti h kya Krna h ky nhi.m wo just entertainment ka jariya h
@Anmoluser10 ай бұрын
bhai agar society change ho jaati movies se then koi bhi student suicide nhi karta chhichore, 3 idiots dekhne ke baad
@iklokesh10 ай бұрын
@@2kdwalapro254 logo ne chori ki hai dude money heist se inspiration leke. Check your facts
@iklokesh10 ай бұрын
@@Anmoluserhow do you know ki kitne logo ne apna de decesion change kar diya. Will they come out and say ki I watched 3 idiots and it changed my decision of not taking my life? Dude these things happens on personal level
@Anmoluser10 ай бұрын
@@iklokesh bro mere kehne ka mtlb tha ki agar movies se inspire log hone lagte toh chhichore jaisi movies dekhne ke baad at least suicide rate kam toh hota but last year hi dekh lo aur ek baat batao koi bilkul seedha saadha insaan movie dekh ke gangster ban sakta hai kya??? nhi na sirf wahi log criminal ban sakte hai movies dekh ke jinki thought process hi criminals ki tarah hai jis insaan ki soch criminal ki tarah hai woh kisi bhi cheez se inspire hoke crime kar sakta hai tum jo chori ka bata rhe ho money heist se toh jin logon ne chori ki unke dimaag mei hi chori karne waali baatein ghumti rehti hongi uss series se toh unhe push mila tha aur aisa push kahin se bhi mil sakta hai newspapers se, articles se, novels se toh kya inn sab ko bhi band karwa de???
@nakularora2659 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely logical and a good reply to his hypocrite and one sided narrative
@yami6499 Жыл бұрын
lol from begining he always gives onesided narrative only...Dhruv rathi is like a 'baba' for todays kids living in gated societies. He dresses in modern clothing and gives an illusion to its listeners of being part of some 'factual crowd'.....and 'different than rest of population'.
@trilokyamohanchakra6351 Жыл бұрын
Bhai yeh bh0s@riwa@la bhi uski friendly gang mein hi hain😂😂, isko pro-hindu stance se jo popularity mili, usko encash karna chahta hain
@malehachowdhury5614 Жыл бұрын
as if Shan didn't make a one-sided biased review in the first place.
@yami6499 Жыл бұрын
@@malehachowdhury5614 difference is ppl who watch Shan's video arent like Dhruv's cult.....where they treat every word spoken by their 'messiah of facts'...as ultimate truth
@arundhati_de Жыл бұрын
Logical nhi Logical fallacy 😂
@Iam1nsane Жыл бұрын
Dhruv Rathee always does this "half truth" videos. Thank you for exposing him.
@The_coding111 Жыл бұрын
🤡🤡🤡🤡
@rohitdusane6159 Жыл бұрын
Correct
@ammygaming2817 Жыл бұрын
truth is nothing but perspective.
@gatocachorro7998 Жыл бұрын
@@The_coding111Aah look darbaari andhnamazis are seething here already 😂😂
@gatocachorro7998 Жыл бұрын
@@ammygaming2817nope. Truth is truth. Perspective changes the perception of the truth, but it remains what it is.
@prabhjot1889 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv Rathee is the same Guy who Loved BREAKING BAD. 🤡
@Womendeservebetter1 Жыл бұрын
He loves gangs of wasseypur too
@prabhjot1889 Жыл бұрын
@@suhaib5941 then comparing Animal to Toxicity is also a biggest Joke.
@atheist1586 Жыл бұрын
Breaking bad n gangs of wassepur movie is not glorifies lead character at all.
@tivky Жыл бұрын
@@atheist1586 LOL really dude ? The BGM was playing Jeeya ho bihar ke lala when Manoj bajpai character was dying in Part 1. Also in Breaking Bad, they turned skyler into a hated wife character to make the fans side with Walter and then they turned Jesse Pinkman into babyface to turn him into a villain. Full Glorification
@swarnaaa Жыл бұрын
@@atheist1586 Abe chutiye kuch toh sense bana le aapne baaton ki
@meeraramaswamy7468 Жыл бұрын
I am not a Dhruv Rathee supporter, but I feel Shan, it’s very important to point out here, that I’m gangs of Wasseypur or sacred games, there is no visual grammar of glorification, which is present in animal. I felt that the visual grammar of animal, be it background music or writing, it’s very important to note that there is no redemption arc, there is no morality, and I felt very uncomfortable when people in the theatre are whistling and shouting for the abusive scenes.
@rajsouth10111 ай бұрын
yes..but Anurag kashyap himself has praised Sandeep Vanga & Animal recently,even calling Sandeep a "mis-understood" director..🤣🤣😂
@rajsouth10110 ай бұрын
@soultune908 💯 😂
@somnathbanerjee_292210 ай бұрын
You need to become strong that's all I would say. People laugh on Men Abuse jokes too. That time did u think all those ?? It's a movie and people were supposed to react like that. Then according to you, Dark humour shouldn't exist.
@minseoksblacknailpolishinw56779 ай бұрын
I agree , they were doing something wrong , they were the anti hero , we do support them , but in our minds we know they made some bad decision, some terrible circumstances, thing go wrong But in case of animal , all of this is shown as giga chad behaviour
@meeraramaswamy74688 ай бұрын
@KratosMessi-eo1yl dude. I’m talking about glorifying domestic violence. He’s literally abusing his wife, and people in the theatre are clapping and cheering. Is this a representation of masculinity?!
@md19974 Жыл бұрын
Films don't influence a society; the society influences films. A film is a reflection of the society. One can choose to moan over the bad reflection or not even look at it. But the image remains whether you wish to accept it or not. Films can never change the moral values of a person as they depend on his/her upbringing and education. I've watched countless films with extremely problematic lead characters but I've never even thought of copying them. I see them as troubled individuals that need help. They serve as a reminder of what not to become in life. If someone becomes morally corrupt just by watching a few films, there is a serious issue with the individual's upbringing, social circle or education. If films had such a huge influence on people, why haven't most people embraced progressive agendas and revolutionary ideas? Critics shouldn't burden films with their own morality. A film can be whatever it's maker wants it to be.
@rawat7203 Жыл бұрын
Spoken like a True Nationalist Jai Siya Ram
@varunsrivastava858 Жыл бұрын
Most logical person here. Kudos to you man🙏
@shesparks64 Жыл бұрын
Its both ways...you must have heard ,criminals doing crime ..inspired by movie scene..
@chandanabose7264 Жыл бұрын
Just get a research on how many drisyam model crimes were reported in last few years😐
@abhishekchahar2743 Жыл бұрын
miya gaalib aapko milte hai 8/10 essay writing mai
@ishanipimpale Жыл бұрын
Sadly Dhruv's Video has 8 million views and this video will hardly get a few 100 thousand views.. we need to push such videos highlighting bias and hypocrisy of so called influencers like Dhruv Rathee
@Dipaace Жыл бұрын
so true share it on reels part wise it has wider reach every one
@drg598 Жыл бұрын
So true...pathan acchi nhi thi Bs usse itna support iss liye mila kyuki usme srk tha aur wo M u s... h If ajay,or akshay would hv been the lead in that movie phir yahi dhruv jaise uska mzak bnate
@ishanipimpale Жыл бұрын
I don't agree with Prateek Borade's views nor do I agree with Dhruv Rathee.. both are very polarizing.. Be on a neutral ground guys
@wolfxx1155 Жыл бұрын
I m sure most of his followers are just purchased bots lol
@amritananda6804 Жыл бұрын
Some mad guy made a stupid movie and i see people fighting between each other for that movie. This samosa youtuber made a video just as an answer to another fellow KZbinr. Shame on you. Dhruv rathe doesnot care, he doesn’t have time to answer to this cheap people
@atulyaarr Жыл бұрын
Bro destroyed German Shepherd single handedly😂
@johnnykillsbatman10 ай бұрын
Lol 😂
@kabbujiha20244 ай бұрын
Right
@shahanali5706Ай бұрын
Andhbhakt making their own happiness 😂😂😂
@kumar_sharma_9Ай бұрын
@@shahanali5706 And Andhnamazi (Pappu bhakt) are sad as always 😂😂😂😂
@Bilu196 ай бұрын
The biggest answer is Sandeep Reddy Vanga answered every single critic except Dhruv Rathee. He didn't even bother to answer him.
@unknown56833 Жыл бұрын
there is a study which shows how after Kabir Singh smoking habits increased in youth in India, yes movies change the way people behave in country like India where youth worship the hero,
@Saffron-p8g3 ай бұрын
Mention the study?
@Brianhacks4u Жыл бұрын
Very logical and sensible reply, my respect for Shan is 10x now for calling dhruv on such a gaslighting video
@ameykazo4194 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money. I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker. If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services. Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
@Indro57 Жыл бұрын
Well, 0*100 = 0
@justlovet.s88234 ай бұрын
Just say you love bjp we can clearly understand your emotions 😊
@Vishal-ny7el Жыл бұрын
This is the response i was expecting when i watched dhruv videos .....hats off man you did this very tastefully👑
@MndM365 Жыл бұрын
Same
@Saurabh-YT9 Жыл бұрын
Yes bro
@Matt_win Жыл бұрын
People who defending animal saying its just a movie should have kept their mouth shut while they were trying to boycott PK and padmawati movie. If you saying movie hei kuch bhi chalega then you should keep that mindset for all movie, not just selective movies 😂, isse 1000x accha hei sam bahadur.
@AshishPrasad-u6y Жыл бұрын
Kya hai Sam bahadur mein 😂😂😂... average and non toxic films are not masterpieces
@AshishPrasad-u6y Жыл бұрын
Animal is totally worth the ticket price and I go to multiplex to be entertained and engaged nd not learn social values😂😂
@vhpnow Жыл бұрын
Bhai ... You can't take manoj 's statement just for the sake of proving your point... Films do have impact on the society.. A single film called KANTARA changed the life of Daiva nartakas in Karanataka... Now Govt. Giving them financial aid the perishing art form got new life after Kantara hit.
@mithileshchakravarty3883 Жыл бұрын
Accha , tu mangalyaan movie dekhne ke baad sare log scientist kyu nahi ban gaye? Movies do not influence society, society influences movies
@vhpnow Жыл бұрын
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 if you are not inspired from Mangalyaan doesn't mean that nobody else has ..... Becoming scientist is not preparing 2 min. Maggie...
@vhpnow Жыл бұрын
At the same time, I am not denying that, films are a reflection of the society... Both visa versa is right only.
@mithileshchakravarty3883 Жыл бұрын
@@vhpnow likewise becoming a criminal is also not a task of 2 mins
@vhpnow Жыл бұрын
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 haha.. Becoming criminal is not good for society in the first place...
@imdib Жыл бұрын
Ab aayenge "that's why education is important" wale 🤣🤣
@justlovet.s88234 ай бұрын
That's why education is important 😌
@mandarbhogan7889 Жыл бұрын
wrong is wrong. No excuses. Can you expect such animal characters in your home. Movies are a mirror of society. So mirrors should be be clean.
@Hey_ItsSid Жыл бұрын
Clean the society, the mirror shows what's standing before it🤷
@Mmm-nj5dk Жыл бұрын
In the end, there is no cure for CRINGE........but some people don't understand that GOW is a well-made film and Animal is CRINGE!!!!
@SunilPatel-qf5fp3 ай бұрын
Does it matter, people don't go to movies to watch well-made films, they go to enjoy. Fight scene were cool, Tripti was looking sexy, songs were good. Acting performance were top norch, not all but many comedic punches were landed.
@PrakharTalksSports Жыл бұрын
I don't agree with the point that films don't change a society or don't have an impact on a society. If that would have been the case then govt. would not have been hellbent in censoring certain movies.
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Mene movie me ra*e scene dekh kar ek ladki ka ra*e kar Diya bhi ab movie ke diractor ko fanshi de do
@adrijaganguly858 Жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Films play a major role in shaping the society.
@madhu6462 Жыл бұрын
Especially the Indian society, we Indians are movie obsessed people, star obsessed people. Youngsters blindly follow their movie idols. We watch so many movies that they leave a subconscious effect on us, ppl r just too ignorant to accept it. They r talking about active and immediate effects which is a rare case of course, but not talking about the long run effect on psychology.
@adrijaganguly858 Жыл бұрын
@@madhu6462 yes, and Dhruv Rathee has explained the long term effects of such movies in his video.
@rajanrai468814 күн бұрын
@@adrijaganguly858 but promote other same kind of movies, what is logic here?
@ashishbehera1150 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv Rathee may be wrong but the movie Animal is utterly illogical and what’s more concerning than the movie is that the character of Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character.
@vishwasmeshram9241 Жыл бұрын
you have still not understood the movie and what it wants to show
@LoneWolf-tk9em Жыл бұрын
Yes, & gamers who play GTA becomes Salmon Khan on roads
@1596bin Жыл бұрын
"Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character" that may be true, but this does not make the film itself toxic. I can paint the most beautiful girl in the world, but if a guy jacks off to that painting its not my art that at fault, it's the perception of my art in the mind of a backwards audience. Animal is made for mature audiences, and it should be judged that way. If the general Indian audience watches 'taxi driver' and tries to kill people to fix the world, that is not the movies fault, it is the audience that lacks maturity. Anything illogical in this movie also exists in many other Bollywood movies, but specifically nit picking this movie for those points because you disagree with the impact it's making is deceptive. Instead of telling sensible people to not watch this movie, maybe there should be an effort to teach people what to actually conclude from this movie....Not to behave like an Animal, that is Ranbir Kapoor in this movie.
@ashishbehera1150 Жыл бұрын
@@1596bin I’m not nit picking Animal at all. Most of the recent Bollywood movies are subpar in terms of logic, Animal being the worst. And let’s not compare Taxi Driver, a cult classic, with this “cringe fest”. I respect your opinion- you liked Animal. But I didn’t. Let’s just leave it at that.
@1596bin Жыл бұрын
@@ashishbehera1150 That is true...you have as much right to dislike this movie as I have to like it Also just to clarify, I was not trying to compare Taxi driver as a film to Animal, but the idea of how it's about a frustrated man that resorts to violence. And in the eyes of a wrong audience this can also create a toxic response. But yes, agree to disagree about the movie 👍
@pawandeepsingh8478 Жыл бұрын
100 % logic video. Well done shan. Dhruv can't defend this logical video 😅
@thelonewarrior1849 Жыл бұрын
Isiliye uske "education is important" wale bots ni h yha😂
@suryasingh9121 Жыл бұрын
@@thelonewarrior1849 Bhai yahi mai kehne bale tha sale uske bots khud to gwaar hote hai orr Bolte hai education is important Chutiya
@Unknown-ps7yb Жыл бұрын
@@thelonewarrior1849 😂😂
@RahimWebDev Жыл бұрын
Animal movie Toxic hai q k violence glorified hai aur GOW is not glorifying violence on top climax mein yeh bhi bataya Jata hai violence k anjaan kia hai . But movies like Animal, KGF are giving rise to anti heroism On top Manoj sir has said that movies don't change society but changes your style.. you see jaab har bande ka style change hojayga then one day society will start accepting bad things as norm.. I am not saying all movies are bad but ek time ta jaab bade Kuch kehtete then we use to respect it but this days har Banda Apne mein ek hero hai.. from where they this attitude..
@slayer_142 Жыл бұрын
Isliye bolta hu world cinema dekha karo ye garbage Indian cinema dekhkar tumahri soch bhi bhut choti ho gayi h
@slayer_142 Жыл бұрын
Bollywood 70s se aurat ko bikni m dikha raha tumhre mulle dada log mast dekhte aa rhe the
@RahimWebDev Жыл бұрын
@@slayer_142 could you explain your POV..?
@_swapnilmishra_ Жыл бұрын
Art in its purest form will always be about the expressionist (expressing what the artist wants to say) rather than the communicator (focusing on the concerns of the viewer). Hope this settles pretty much every debate regarding this movie.
@abirvaabchatterjee6439 Жыл бұрын
That is so fucking on point!!
@ojaswidikshit Жыл бұрын
Very aptly said.
@sachin.hota1 Жыл бұрын
Acha
@peterparker9954 Жыл бұрын
Then why did Shan prasher do randi rona when thank you for coming, four more shots, gehraiyan released ? They are also art
@hopnews_jr Жыл бұрын
7 millions views hai.. Dekh k grow to kar rahe ho... But jo German shepherd ko expose karte hai.. Unko 100k viewers only... Why?? Share truth..
@amritmkr Жыл бұрын
What dhruv said is actually true and I support him because i watched power rangers and now i am red ranger❤😎
@mayankindian3750 Жыл бұрын
Ha ha 😅😂
@vivekkparashar Жыл бұрын
Why not white ranger , he was op
@amritmkr Жыл бұрын
@@vivekkparashar White ranger of dino thunder was my fav 😁
@KaushalyaPatil-wy3ff Жыл бұрын
ABE SALE😂
@somnathbanerjee_292210 ай бұрын
Good One😂
@saransh_naik Жыл бұрын
At the End, nowadays 18+ Indian viewers are smart enough to understand what to see and what to consume !! 🙂
@Shaktisingh84599 Жыл бұрын
Really😅😮😮😮
@MoinKhan-uf4pg Жыл бұрын
Not everyone but some are
@addytechie6948 Жыл бұрын
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgI think the general population is sane enough to know what's reality and what's fiction.
@kakun63 Жыл бұрын
Thats why dhruv tatti is viewd by so many
@vivekkparashar Жыл бұрын
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgyou might not be , but most of us are
@princeclassen Жыл бұрын
Dhruv was saying ki movies aesi banni chahiye ki jisne violence ko glamorise na Kiya jaaye , he meant ki Jo khoon karaba kar Raha hai use galat dikhana chahiye, jo women par control karta hai, use galat dikhana chahiye, but animal me aesa karne Wale ko hero dikhaya gya hai, tum logo ko samajh aana chahiye ki the message that he gave while criticising animal were all correct,
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
Agreed. He was sure to make this point. That movies can be violent but they shouldn't be glorified
@ShikharYadav-n9z3 ай бұрын
Bhai ambani tumhe car she udda me chala jayega to tumhe justice milega? Esha sochna bhi joke hai 😂 Logo ko false hope kiyu de?
@Pra.ds9 Жыл бұрын
I had exactly the same feeling while watching his video. I feel that, just like us, he has the right to express his opinion, but not at the cost of looking down on others. If you didn't like the movie, that's fine; you can come out and put your opinion, but when you are doing it with ill intentions, that's when your opinion turns into propaganda.
@criwery Жыл бұрын
He's just using his audience into believing ki Jo vo sochta h Jo uske opinions hain waise hi sbke hone chahiye!!! That's how he keeps manipulating each and every subscriber
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Money over openion
@Anonymous-pu8tr Жыл бұрын
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
@TheCatAndTheArt Жыл бұрын
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
@krisskross6074 Жыл бұрын
Most of his videos are propaganda.
@Narindersinghsidhuu Жыл бұрын
No, shan you didn't call out animal with equal intensity as you have called out thank you for coming and other films. You justified ranbir's character by saying that he was saving his sister . But you didn't realise he brought a gun in college and even fired it.
@mariapauline8732 Жыл бұрын
Right
@HimanshuRanjan-zb2rv4 ай бұрын
@@mariapauline8732 because acc to him only toxic feminism based movies affects society not toxic masculinity movies ? bro literally mai 18 19 saal ke bacho ko padhata bhi hoon unhone jab kaha ki achi film toh hai sir Ill tell them ask me same question after some years and as a teacher I admire professor vikas divyakirti sir who said "films like animal take our society 10 years back"
@mariapauline87324 ай бұрын
@@HimanshuRanjan-zb2rv very true, in the end if they showed that Ranbir is bad n he learnt lesson what he did he is not right then still I can accept but showing a man should be like this, it effects the boys mentality
@siddhimishra4708 Жыл бұрын
After watching Rathi ji ka video I was judging myself 😂😂 I was like something is wrong with me but thanks to you I feel relieved
@_RakeshGupta Жыл бұрын
Tu khud chutiye hai kyoki tu dusre par bharosa karta hai😅
@harshijain7834 Жыл бұрын
We are the same bro 😂
@kakun63 Жыл бұрын
Shame on u no wonder our india is filled with pappus and andbhakts use ur brain
@Hmm19872 Жыл бұрын
Andhbhakt hai kya tu jo Germany shepherd ka propaganda dekhta hai uska logic aur Gyan WhatsApp University se milta hai tu khud se research Kiya kr 😂🤣🤣
@flcco.2981 Жыл бұрын
We live in an era where Munnu can watch BDSM porn in 4K UHD resolution. This film is peanut compared to that. Needless to say Germany, The Netherlands was porn capital once upon a time.
@cjonyoutube3011 Жыл бұрын
If any sensible or logical person watches SRV movies, you know the main character is always the real villain of the story. I was more scared of RANVIJAY than ABRAR in ANIMAL
@heysmn Жыл бұрын
Exactly! Idk how were people not able to see this in the movie, Ranvijay was literally screaming through the screen that he's problematic.
@finsol9720 Жыл бұрын
That's why this movie name is "Animal"
@shiv87shukla Жыл бұрын
This is the bestest video of yours till date.. brilliantly explained.. That's like an educated boy, with no fake narrative and propoganda..full support to you shan brother..👍
@RevandReact_withMohit Жыл бұрын
Exactly bro...He has always surpassed himself ❤..
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@thegameking3931 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu usne kabhi nahi bola yeh movie good hai society keliye aur dusri baat tere jaise kamzor mindset wale itna hi influence ho jaate hai toh movies dekhna chod de tu phir jitne dhruv rathee ne acha review diya ganga of wasseypur sacred games jaisi woh konsa good hai society
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
@@thegameking3931 so are you a disrespectful person inherently or did you get influenced by these movies to be disrespectful? Neither should make you proud. Chomu it seems, speak for yourself bro.
@thegameking3931 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu sabko apne tarah samjha hai kya tune Jo koi bhi movies dekhe influence ho jaata hai itna bada gawar nahi hu shyad tere surrounding ke honge aur tu movies dekhna chod de Indian movies se influence hojayega toh Hollywood movies tujhe dekhne bhi nahi chahiye. Jaha baat influence ki toh meine Indian movies dekhi bhi nahi hai 2 3 saal se toh tere point invalid hai aur tujhe kyu lagta movie dekhna kuch proud jaisa hai gochu chomu tu hai aur rahega
@yashabkafeel9817 Жыл бұрын
This is the way to call out Dhruv’s personal biased opinion. And psychological terms are on point 👏🏼 I don’t think anyone else could have made a better video on replying Dhruv rathee 🔥🔥
@SilvioDante-qg7dc Жыл бұрын
This random KZbinr's views is less than 10% of dhruv rathee video liked.😂😂😂
@starshiperxy Жыл бұрын
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc yeah his audience can't even take truth ,they are just crybabies thinking that they are educated from that manipulator
@Slayup_13 Жыл бұрын
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc But that won't change the fact that Shan gave all logical explanations & exposed Dhruv's biased opinion lol 😂
@Dipaace Жыл бұрын
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc popularity he has is for knowledgable content about history science and politics.he is not a movie reviewer .dhruv said gangs of wasseypur as clut movie....and now he has algery with voilence and animal is cancer..he just made the vedio cuz Animal is the hot topic and everyone is watching it and he seek opportunity for more views and more subscriber. but he forget about his past vedios bullshit.
@sunilsabat-0483 Жыл бұрын
@@Dipaaceacha hua gow money heist sacred games ki video netflix pe padi hai warna german shepard apne purane kartut chupane me mahir hai
@Tat.Tvamm.Asi....... Жыл бұрын
"Thats why education is important" wale nahi dikh rahe 🤡
@kukhyatbabhan3105 Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@Sarthak_Joravar Жыл бұрын
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂 1: "ANdBhakT" 2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt" 3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you " 4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh" 5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
@Sarthak_Joravar11 ай бұрын
@@JaiJAGGANATH453 yes, only librandus can understand molana dhruv lathee
@NasifaYeasmin11 ай бұрын
That's why besides education before making a video against dhruv watching his full video is important 🤣
@ttttt666611 ай бұрын
@@Sarthak_Joravar and most sensible haters of dhruv rathee like u 🐵
@dopmonk Жыл бұрын
There is a difference between portrayal of violence in Anurag Kashyap films and Sandeep's films. Anurag depicts it while Sandeep celebrates it. There is crude violence and then there is sensational violence. I have childhood friends who never got the privilege of getting good education, when you hear their opinion and see how they idolize Ranbir's character, you'll get to know where the problem lies and why Dhruv's arguments are logical to a great extent.
@dopmonk Жыл бұрын
And you can only blame the director in this context because if not everyone, people are going to idolize a person who "Protects his family" at any cost, rides a private jet and fires machine guns. Not everyone has the intellectual ability to maturely understand problematic plots. They end up subscribing to a wrong ideology which will reflect in their actions at micro levels.
@mariapauline8732 Жыл бұрын
Rightly said. Animal is glorifying the crime.
@Garima2837 Жыл бұрын
@@Krishngaminglive I have, he is absolutely right. You are 'fools' for not understanding the difference between these movies. Anurag's movies show the reality and never promotes violence. As the writer of this comment rightly said violence isn't celebrated in his movies. Where as in animal violence has been glorified.
@marcosurvivalist7266 Жыл бұрын
animal ne kese violence ko celeberate kiya hai jara batayenge aap
@dopmonk Жыл бұрын
@@marcosurvivalist7266 Remember the machine gun scene background music? Remember the scene where Ranbir walks out naked? It celebrates violence the same way few punjabi songs promote gun violence. The difference is subtle yet polarizes viewers so much so that they start taking offence when something is said against the film.
@bigbull004 Жыл бұрын
When dhruv released that video, I truly self questioned my own choice of liking Animal movie. I was thinking, is my mentality going downwards? Do I like crime? Thanks to Shan bhai for making this video and making me believe that no matter what anyone says or want to force any narrative on me, I wouldn't get underneath next time of anyone. I'll honestly question everything and then make choice of own for liking or not. Shoutout to Shan bhai❤❤
@loveyourself-n6y Жыл бұрын
If manipulating is an art, then Dhruv is Picasso of it
@bigbull004 Жыл бұрын
@@loveyourself-n6y you correctly said.
@bigbull004 Жыл бұрын
@@suhaib5941 look we make our opinions based on our surroundings, childhood, and then what we see, what we read so if dhruv will counter all points of this video with the valid reasons, I'll accept it happily.
@screensafari17 Жыл бұрын
@@bigbull004dhruv to biased hai par animal hai to mediocre movie. Devesh Dixit k comedy roast dekhna animal ka.
@Misyognitic-king Жыл бұрын
@@bigbull004so no use of your brain , good .
@ankitm0333 Жыл бұрын
Manoj Sir once said that, we as people / audience can’t dictate whether such a film should be made or not. Censor board is there for that part. And if you don’t like “such” films, don’t go and watch it. Simple. An artist doesn’t owe anything to the society, to public. And it’s not an artist’s job to give “message” in his/ her work. Rajamouli sir once said that his job is to ENTERTAIN public, and not to PREACH them.
@philfact10M Жыл бұрын
What is the role movie critics, will you define it
@seasonaltheology8314 Жыл бұрын
@@philfact10MDhruv is not a movie critic. He keeps poking his nose everywhere and this time he put his foot on the wrong ground.
@Anonymous-pu8tr Жыл бұрын
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
@shishirtrivedi3668 Жыл бұрын
@@philfact10Mnothing, it's a made up profession for unemployed people watching movies all the time
@philfact10M Жыл бұрын
@@shishirtrivedi3668 If movie stories is nonsense ( nothing ) Why not critics will criticise. Critics or criticism writers are much more relavent than story less filmmakers.
@Sarma.k_123 Жыл бұрын
To all the men here, if u don't find animal movie toxic, then u r that Ranvijay. To all the women here, if u found Ranvijay isn't toxic, the sisters u actually deserve a partner like ranvijay. P.s. - showing a toxic character isn't bad. Showing violence in a movie isn't bad. Coz violence actually occurs in the society, nd there are so many toxic people in our society. But glorifying toxicity nd violence is dangerous. I watched a very violent movie once named Raman Raghav 2.0. so much violence were in that movie. But those toxic characters nd their mistakes were not glorified in tgat movie like Kabir Singh nd Animal. I'll support Dhruv Rathee in yhis case though I'm a big fan of both Shan nd Dhruv. Nd this is my personal opinion. Nd one more thing, I'm against the toxic feminist movies like thank you for coming.
@AshishPrasad-u6y Жыл бұрын
It has everything u expect from commercial A rated action film..not some sermon delivered by Sadhguru or any baba promoting toxicity
@Sarma.k_123 Жыл бұрын
@@AshishPrasad-u6y bro, commercial movies affects common people also. Do u remember, after releasing Kabir Singh some teen girls were like "I also want a bf like Kabir Singh.". A teen age boy/ girl doesn't have much knowledge about life like us. They have different fantasy. It's all about psychological thing. Some people are influenced by these types of movies bro. Plz try to understand this. Plz don't support the movies which glorify being toxic. No matter what gender that character is. Alia Character from gully boy was toxic. But still that character was glorified nd that's a toxic thing. Few girls might be influenced by that character. Who knows. Just imagine have gf like Alia Bhatt's character in gully boy. Ur life will be hell. I hope now u understand what I said. Vanga doesn't give a damn about how many people gonna influenced by his toxic movies like Kabir Singh nd animal as he's making a big amount of money by selling those so called alpha male Characters. But it's our duty not to glorify nd not to influenced by them. Goodnight bro .
@DuduBubuToxic8 ай бұрын
Kabir literally said at the end that he would give up all bad habits. He redeemed himself and hence deserved his happy ending. Ranvijay did not die but the most precious thing, his father, got taken away from him. Dying doesn't wash away your sins. There is no glorification here, unless you want the typical hero-giving-speech-at-the-end thing. That would be too boring and cliched.
@Sarma.k_1238 ай бұрын
@@DuduBubuToxic u r influenced. Congrats 👏🎉
@DuduBubuToxic8 ай бұрын
@@Sarma.k_123 Thanks, and as a return gift, you should be forced to watch A Serbian film. Best movie for the likes of you who don't have an ounce of understanding of cinema but call someone "influenced" while herself being influenced by German shepherd.
@Yashyadav-ib3he Жыл бұрын
For you all if you think movies doesn't effect our society so listen When I watched Padman I started to talk about periods and When I watched Mission Mangal I got motivated for space science and result Now I am here in IISC Bangalore to pursue my bachelor in Physics major.
@theKrishnaMale Жыл бұрын
Then ur easy to manipulate.
@tech_report_0868 Жыл бұрын
Wow , had no idea it was so easy to manipulate you. God forbid tomorrow a movie comes out on t€rrori$m...
@Yashyadav-ib3he Жыл бұрын
@@tech_report_0868 I don't know what I should write to you all . But sometimes I feel it's not your fault because your family never teach you how to control the content you watch. I think they never had any parental control on you. That's why you came to support such a toxic and violent movie
@tech_report_0868 Жыл бұрын
@@Yashyadav-ib3he Another BS comment when you can't refute the point. Haven't even watched Animal. Also , maybe your parents should've taught you self control and critical thinking capabilities , well , you could've developed these yourself if your parents would've provided some autonomy in your life , which definitely doesn't seem the case as you can be so easily manipulated. Classic case of controlling parents. Don't blame them though, it could be generational trauma too , who knows , maybe they got manipulated into doing something wrong too considering how easily manipulative you are. Oh , "Parents never controlled what you watch" , yes , unlike your parents when I reached a certain age , they decided to stop controlling the content that I watch , because my parents TRUST me. Maybe try instilling a sense of trust in your parents , they'd probably stop controlling you & your content too.
@Yashyadav-ib3he Жыл бұрын
@@tech_report_0868 It's possible but it depends on me if I am going to watch that or not . Because I really respect my mind, it is not dustbin to fill negative thoughts
@superheroandcinemawonder7001 Жыл бұрын
Thank you shan Bhai. It's needed he always gives byest reviews. Thank you for call out karne ke liye. Keep Doing good work.😊
@vipin7975 Жыл бұрын
Shan bhai nailed it❤.
@Neha-lb2ym Жыл бұрын
I watched animal and being a thriller,action and gore movies fan and being a woman Dhruv’s video made me feel bad… thank you Shan for calling this out
@vivekkparashar Жыл бұрын
Indeed, and Animal movie was not glorifying anything... Ranbir's character lost almost everything in his life and his actions led to the rise of his psychotic double
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
Shan Prasher ji. Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Lagatar dumb videos aa rahi hain from you. If I said, you keep posting these body building photos even though you would never qualify as a professional body builder. Does that help to negate your dumb argument? No. So however Dhruv has presented his video, his argument is that the movie is cancer. You’re attacking his presentation and past videos, but you haven’t been able to make any negating statement about his argument itself yet. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Even though Dhruv’s video is not perfect, you’ve got nothing on him. Screaming loud on the screen doesn’t make you smart sorry.
@ethanmanjhi4007 Жыл бұрын
The problem with dhruv is he is misinterpreting facts...he is comparing rapists and misogynistic people with the one who watch these cult classic films...one of dhruv rathee viewers was female and dhruv rathee made her believe that all people in that theatre who are wooing and cheering are the one who likes to rape Or like to do extreme misogyny
@RameshKumar-ng3nf Жыл бұрын
Sahi to kaha Dhruv on ANIMAL movie. Atleast there was someone who talked against the movie. Aap bhi support karo on this instead of finding unecessary faults and targeting him.
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@sankulpandey9388 Жыл бұрын
I am so happy that I follow this channel from a very long time. So proud of shan prasher to call out dhruv rathee's bias. Brilliant. 🙏🏻
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Paise mile he isko ye video banane ke liya
@ambikakar5609 Жыл бұрын
@@chandrabhansingh6778ha ha German Shephard ko har video keliye paisa milta hai
@TheCatAndTheArt Жыл бұрын
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
@avinfilms4044 Жыл бұрын
Nailed it, brother. This video demonstrates that criticism and disagreement can coexist with respect. Regards from Adelaide, Australia 🇦🇺
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
He may have called out Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot.
@aryagaonkar2161 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains problem is hypocrisy of druv rathee and his fans like you.On one side he promotes gow, breaking bad and sacred games and then he criticize animal,why different criteria according to movies?And yes this youtuber Shan Prasher also criticize negative aspects of animal and appreciate positive aspects also,but the way druv calls rapist to fans of gore, slasher,action genre movies is pure hypocrisy, it's everyone personal choice to see and love movies .You can't judge the character of person by choices of movie.And yes I also criticize negative aspects of animal but degrading the whole movie for your own judgement is definitely not acceptable,and yes if you have valid counter argument then reply me I will definitely reply you. 5:24 5:24
@Anonymous-px9wk Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtainswhy he should prove anything he is not calling animal great social changer movie Dhruv rathee should prove that just like animal gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad etc are not a cancer to society Whoever pays him money then that movie is great & when he is not paid for review that movie becomes cancer for the society You are so dumb you didnt get the gist of the whole video Its about hypocrisy
@animeambience8433 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains Least Retarded dhruv rathee fan
@erasernox2611 Жыл бұрын
@@aryagaonkar2161i agree to some of shans point but shan also misrepresented few of the things, when he tryna expose dhruv hypocrisy like misrepresentation of death note anime
@piyalighosh_7 Жыл бұрын
U are absolutely correct…Dont know how KZbinrs can take fat cheques and so blatantly lie to the audience who give them their livelihood.. he should be shown that audience have brains and cannot be manipulated..
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@Dover55 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains Animal is not cancer for society, you are accountable for what you do not the movie makers. It has been marketed in a way that alerts people to keep their children away from this movie. And stop spamming everywhere lil bro
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
@@Dover55 sure responsibility should be on an individual rather than a collective, because humans are not social beings. You are so right. Next to shock audience, if filmmakers start putting out snuff films, that would be okay too. Creative liberty and individual responsibility and all. You make such good points.
@AmazingSoham_047 Жыл бұрын
I love the payment portion the most. How mockingly he tells about Dhruv's payment 😂
@themboys304 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for calling out hypocrisy of Dr. Shepherd
@actorsheart3142 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for coming up and addressing this with an objective video. More power to you!
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@riddhimanbanerjee8806 Жыл бұрын
After watching the Dhruv Rathee video , I felt that KZbin shouldn't have removed the dislike button
@tuhinmridha422 Жыл бұрын
sure
@justlovet.s88234 ай бұрын
Do you love your mother?
@chinmayeepradhan277 Жыл бұрын
Films doesn’t change a humans moral conduct but when it glorifies such characters, people with similar though traits and behaviours, this validation makes them act on it.
@johnfaith9486 Жыл бұрын
Baazigar is most loved thriller by every one.Srk killed a girl in the film.Still it is considered best even by Critics.
@tech_report_0868 Жыл бұрын
I watched Oppenheimer some days back , on my way to get my hands on some U235
@Sid20-jd7mb Жыл бұрын
@@tech_report_0868😂 bro CIA will come after you.
@karanrathore8042 Жыл бұрын
Shan bhai ne german shepherd ko uski aukaat dikhadi 🙃
@Lavgupta-sb7wn10 ай бұрын
Ha dikh rha hai
@Wanheda1009411 ай бұрын
Cigarette peena..cancer ko promote karna hai. 🤡 This line is enough to know the level of Intellect Dhruv has about movies.
@meetukaur0909 Жыл бұрын
if you have heard dhruv rathee properly, he always says "usually" and not "always", your allegation that he is calling every viewer of that type of movie as toxic is completely unjustified.
@aman3232 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv is no saint ma'am , he has mastered the art of cherry picking
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. He never said that people who watch violent movies are toxic. He said that people who angrily defend these movies to the point of attacking others on social media are toxic
@RChatterjee_15 Жыл бұрын
This is an analysis in the true sense of the word. And kudos to you for doing this without any bias.
@ankitjain1612 Жыл бұрын
Finally someone logical and entertaining at the same time giving counter relpy to biased video of Dhruv which he is doing from long time Well done Shan bhai keep going 👏
@erwinsmith5796 Жыл бұрын
Abe gadhe tu mat dekha na to usse 😂😂😂
@raja-jl9os Жыл бұрын
Mujhe hamesa se lagta tha ki mumbai ki ladkiya khubsurat hoti h because of bollywood but aisa nhi h 😢
@hiteshkumar1314 Жыл бұрын
@@raja-jl9os Tu yaha pe bhi aagaya
@hiteshkumar1314 Жыл бұрын
@@raja-jl9os Tu konsa State se hai ?!
@raja-jl9os Жыл бұрын
@@hiteshkumar1314 mere kahne ka matlab h ki mumbai ki ladkiya bhi average hoti h
@Benarasiyaa.. Жыл бұрын
Dhruv Rathee didn't like violence and message used in Animal but for sure he definitely liked Game of Thrones and squid games kind of movies cuz those movies or series are in foreign languages and that is cool according to him...
@human6729 Жыл бұрын
He never said that.Those were reality of those times.this is created with plot.also this is celebrating anti heroism and this should only be watched by adults but here teenagers and kids watch
@sumanmajumdar7884 Жыл бұрын
@@human6729then it's the fault of parents ki wo apne bache ko nahi sambhal sakte
@Writing_freak Жыл бұрын
Tbh....Game of Thrones is way different (and way better) than animal....both have violence but one glorifies it and one doesn't....there ain't no regret in Ranveer Kapoor's character....to a certain point the violence was justifiable but then it crossed the limits.... especially with the womanizing part.... Game of Thrones is on a totally different arc
@sumanmajumdar7884 Жыл бұрын
explain how animal glorify violence and GOT not? jab ki waha l katne wala scene bhi tha @@Writing_freak
@Wanheda1009411 ай бұрын
@@Writing_freak Yes.. unnecessary nudity and having incestual relationship is totally normal and an integral part of Society as shown in GOT. 👍
@aryantoppo19510 ай бұрын
Bro, in animal, violence is highly glorified, but in gangs of wasseypur, the violence is subjective, and not glorified, thats what dhruv was saying
@sanyamtomar81819 ай бұрын
Do you seriously believe that these people will get that?
@vaibhav17S109 ай бұрын
He never said that neither trying to do this ,the video is criticising his hypocrisy how he promoted movies containing violence in past plus his analysis of movie isn't right he called fans toxic because they like animal.makes no sense
@vaibhav17S109 ай бұрын
@@sanyamtomar8181for sure these people will get that
@madts2439 ай бұрын
Then why He promoted Death note
@sanyamtomar81819 ай бұрын
@@madts243 Cause in the end Light gets what he deserved. But in Animal the animal gets away with everything and has a happy ending.
@SayantikaSarkar007 Жыл бұрын
People's capacity for independent thought seems obscured, as evidenced by the gathering of seemingly mindless followers around Dhruv Rathee. His videos, staunchly one-sided, meticulously disseminate a carefully curated agenda that is ingested without question by his devoted audience. Your valiance and courage is commendable Shan 🙌 Thank you for sharing a dissenting perspective I know this will inevitably draw the ire of his zealous followers, who, like a brigade, are poised to inundate the comments section with disparagement. It is a perplexing phenomenon, the sway one person can hold over others, guiding them down a path of unquestioning adherence, even when the narrative presented is heavily skewed.
@Womendeservebetter1 Жыл бұрын
Itna english merko bhi sikhna hai
@bu11ymaguire Жыл бұрын
Oi, if you are talking about braindead followers then you dont necessarily need to be writing tharoor-ish.
@saadiaahmed6617 Жыл бұрын
@@bu11ymaguire😂
@kartiksharma3122 Жыл бұрын
Couldn't agree more brother.. not just this video but most of dhruv rathee's videos are staunchly one sided and full of cherry picked facts which supports his agenda, on top of that he presents his videos in such a way that a regular viewer of his channel would say that dhruv is totally neutral and is just presenting facts but in reality it's the opposite.
@ajatshatru33BCE Жыл бұрын
His good thing which attracts millions is his well articulated presentation and easy way of breaking things down.. Is he biased? Yes ofcourse
@anees_2005 Жыл бұрын
Though I am fan of Dhruv, but yes you rightly pointed out his doglapan by showing his clips on Wasseypur and Sacred Games. Good call out Shan!
@k_t8042 Жыл бұрын
fan of duggal? have you seen his videos. propaganda at its best
@mayankumar1312 Жыл бұрын
Same
@gumdrop465 Жыл бұрын
Lol how can u be his fan. 🤣🤣 He is a pathetic person. If u hv brain stay away from his propaganda 😒
@anees_2005 Жыл бұрын
@k_t8042 sorry, but I disagree with you. Cos he is the one who calls out the propoangandas, and most of his videos are informational and educational. Here Shan rightly pointed out his dubious review. And I am just a fan of Dhruv as I am of Shan, but not a blind follower of anyone Anyways, we all are entitled to our opinions and I respect your's
@devanshsaxena8064 Жыл бұрын
Bss abb toh baat khatam ho gyi...
@kindofanmol Жыл бұрын
Watched the movie a couple of days ago and I just can't fathom why some people are bashing it for no reason. I loved it SO MUCH. Brilliantly written and executed story about an unhinged main character. It doesn't justify ANYTHING from Ranvijay's character and all of his negative actions have some ramifications or consequences. Geetanjali's brilliant monologue calling him out for his toxic behaviours and her slapping Ranvijay multiple times made it absolutely perfect and showed that the script is not glorifying any of his actions.
@SpaceCowboy5634 Жыл бұрын
massive taste issue
@mrvedartx4810 Жыл бұрын
Brilliantly written story??? to deem this narrative as brilliantly crafted and executed seems incredulous.
@nimraimroze Жыл бұрын
Let’s not forget that Gangs of Waseypur is real life based story and is about criminal whereas in animal they have shown a normal person doing this kind of stuff. He clearly mentioned that if ranbir has been declared mentally ill or something, it would have been justified.
@VishnuKaveti Жыл бұрын
What abt death note? Breaking bad? It is the fact that he didn't get money to promote it that's it. There are many genuine KZbinrs with less no. Of subscribers and have more ethics and morals than dhruv
@epedso4417 Жыл бұрын
ghutno per jorr dalo didi
@blackbeast9057 Жыл бұрын
@@VishnuKavetiDude , the point that dhruv made that senseless violence without any story or use is bad. And he also gave the whole context that when and for whom these movies are bad. Literally 99% of the people against him pick only one point. "Violence is bad in movies" without taking the context.
@kekhrievituomedom2353 Жыл бұрын
@@blackbeast9057choro bhai yeh sab logic nahi dudh rehe hai just want attention from us yeh sab intsa aur TikTok wale hai 😂😂
@wethepeople1296 Жыл бұрын
Follow ExMuslim Zafar Heretic to get out of this deadly cult
@sahelisaha1504 Жыл бұрын
I think you mixed Violence Action and Toxicity altogether.. portraying violence is not an issue, real issue is justifying or being ok about it. Gangs of Wasseypur or any other movies that Dhruv promoted never showed what the hero is doing as justified or normal. And Salman khan has done n number of meaningless action movies think hard why there is no objection for those ? There is a difference between Violence and Action which you clearly mixed.
@AI-thought Жыл бұрын
That dog 🐕 clearly a biased youtuber and his followers are uneducated enough to think beyond his propoganda.
@sivashisdutta8737 Жыл бұрын
I believe anyone can have an opinion. If you liked the Animal movie well and good; if you hated the movie then also well and good. But judging the persons that liked the film and calling them mentally unstable, misogynist, repressed is not correct. Who tf are you to judge anyone according to their taste in movies
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Money bhi to important he
@Anonymous-px9wk Жыл бұрын
@@chandrabhansingh6778next time animal part 2 will give him money to give positive reviews
@TheCatAndTheArt Жыл бұрын
There is nothing wrong with calling out a film for teaching something harmful to society, as it can validate criminals of that kind in real life. Given the existing levels of craziness, hate, and violence in the real world, it is crucial to be mindful of the impact media can have on shaping perceptions and behavior.
@Anonymous-px9wk Жыл бұрын
@@TheCatAndTheArt wrong is hypocrisy Calling animal cancer & promoting gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad because netflix pays him momey to give positive reviews?
@sivashisdutta8737 Жыл бұрын
@@TheCatAndTheArt Ok so according to you we should ban the entire action-thriller genre
@aspirant5410 Жыл бұрын
"Netflix se payment leke.."😂😂😂😂 i loved the way you called out that german shepherd... He is a propaganda master and everyone in india is aware of it by now.. its good that you called out that duffer. 👍
@AswajithSI Жыл бұрын
It’s called “giving a choice to the audience”. Gangs of Wasseypur was narrated such a way that all those killings and blood shed were not stylised but was shown as a reflection of their everyday life. The filmmaker gave a choice to the audience wherein they can choose right from wrong. Animal on the other hand glorifies the protagonist so much so that the killings adultery misogyny and regressiveness is blatantly justified. That is exactly where the problem really is. Portraying a character is different from worshiping a character. Animal worships, GoW portrays.
@felinemonstrosity Жыл бұрын
Itni baat fanboys ko thodi smjh aayegi, they're on blind defence mode, especially this shaan..idk if he is being paid by vanga himself the way he is defending animal with his life and blood lol
@adityaunde4134 Жыл бұрын
When did it glorify. Both Rashmika and Ranbir faced consequences of their actions. Have u even watched the film or just watched it in reels?
@SwapnilTete-y9e Жыл бұрын
@@adityaunde4134where did they faced consequences? Lmao he cheated on her and then kissed her to not go away.
@beastintheattic3992 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathee : -Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in politics -Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in movie Very chalakh bro very chalakh😂😂
@paranoidpatrick7736 Жыл бұрын
The video of Dhruvs on animal movie was the first time I disagreed. "Movies should be taken as a movie not reality". One sided perceptions is always wrong perspective.
@rudrapriyabasu5662 Жыл бұрын
Yes, absolutely bhi sab ne yeh logic hoga na hypocrisy hoga samaj ni paye
@paranoidpatrick7736 Жыл бұрын
@@sonalikain Haha bs yuhi rak diya atscha lga isliye:)
@Vegetasinghyadav Жыл бұрын
If u intelligent, u will understand, almost every video he make is paid to cater to a particular audience which is already biased and opinionated abt a certain topic. The rythemic way in which he speaks and everything that parashar pointed out. If anybody thinks its just abt animal movie review must be kidding himself
@R_t-99 Жыл бұрын
Same with four more shots please and veera di wedding. Films should be taken as Film
@ses7470 Жыл бұрын
Not sure, about this but it definitely left a worse impression on teenagers watching this movie. I won't advise people below 25 who are not mature enough to watch this movie. This might influence decision making and normalize this behaviour by actors as okay for our society
@invisiblemanwithfacts.8995 Жыл бұрын
Someone of Team Animal give some pedigree to the German shepherd. Only then the German shepherd will bark the positivity of Animal film 😅😅😅😅
@bharathikuruganti35568 ай бұрын
no wonder we always try to put personal comments on their personal life of the people who are in public life. let it be mr. pawan kalyan in AP or any one else we are habituated for a long time . dont worry the attempt to change has begun, manzil door nahi hai bhai
@parulyadav9235 Жыл бұрын
So accurate and so good. Thank you so much for creating such well researched video bcz it’s so sad tht people like dhruv just like to force their opinions on people.
@GAMINGBLAZE Жыл бұрын
Why people still watching his propaganda videos ? He has been exposed numerous time for giving biased facts from Leftist news articles. We Indians have a problem where we see Veed or "crowd" we go to that shop. German Shepard is just using that mindset of Indians. I always cross check information after watching something & i could not stand his Leftist biased videos stopped watching his videos for 4 years, moreover he claims he is unbiased , at least he should be honest with his audience
@nitinpratap3958 Жыл бұрын
What is bcz?
@GAMINGBLAZE Жыл бұрын
because@@nitinpratap3958
@KADAKSAMBALPURI Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathe is best explainer😊
@GAMINGBLAZE Жыл бұрын
@@KADAKSAMBALPURI a german shepard puppy detected
@ronnie_2910 Жыл бұрын
The thing is both 4 more Shots and Animal are toxic. However, the problem is when we just diss Thank you for coming and 4 more shots but celebrate Animal. Aur iss genre ko kya kehte hai Shan bhai, Sigma male genre.
@pritech8302 Жыл бұрын
4 more Shots are much much much toxic movie then animal
@lilrogue6869 Жыл бұрын
Kaise toxic hai animal? Isme cheating ko glorify kiya? Usne apni biwi pe hath uthaya? Disrespect kiya sabke samne? Kaise hai toxic?
@ronnie_2910 Жыл бұрын
@@pritech8302 Agreed. These people are shown as protagonist in the story which is quite problematic. If you look at Gangs of Wasseypur, none of the characters are protagonists and each died a horrible death in the story. That's not the case with movies like Thank you for coming or Animal. They glorify promiscuity and adultery.
@pritech8302 Жыл бұрын
@@lilrogue6869wahi toh bro.. Sabse jyda females hi danger ban chuka hain society ke liye
@5150Amrit Жыл бұрын
@@ronnie_2910 Not every anti-hero have to die at the end of the movie. That would make the genre too predictable which Animal isn't, instead it showed physical & relational consequences in the form of his body organs getting failed, wife leaving him, his dad dying which is far more consequential than the his own death, even Bobby's motive wasn't to kill him but to kill his father & every family members through his look-a-like that would've destroyed Ranvijay's character from the inside. The 2nd part might even have more of these consequences like Gangs of Wasseypur 2 had.
@TheAryanzzz Жыл бұрын
The Much Needed Video!!!! Finally someone is understanding how to tackle this Manipulator.
@Halwahaikya-l4v11 ай бұрын
Dhruv ratthe fans are so innocent thinking themself educated by watching his biased videos😂😂
@bharathikuruganti35568 ай бұрын
sorry bro/mam, i disagree with you. Mr. Rathee videos are only other side of the coin. Always Mr. Arnab Goswami cannot be right. only because he shouts louder , heis argumets are ONLY THE TRUTH. I have the basic right to keep my opinion , so mr Rathee has. Dissent is te basic right of Democracy , whic unfortunately has been in oblivion for some time .
@RakeshKumar-o8n6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 u must be proud of watching animal that glorifies extreme level of violence and cringe subject matter
@ArnabChowdhury-m1k12 күн бұрын
Jio janta dhruv rathee audience 🥱
@shramanasarkar6848 Жыл бұрын
It's glad to see someone finally saying film does not change society...
@bharathsingh5944 Жыл бұрын
Fun fact is Animal’s streaming partner is Netflix 😂
@sunilsabat-0483 Жыл бұрын
German shepard ko Is baar pedigree nahi mila netflix ki taraf se isliye gussa haii
@bharathsingh5944 Жыл бұрын
@@sunilsabat-0483 😂
@NoirOsain Жыл бұрын
Nobody responded to you or anyone about a movie review , but you proved him right that fans of these movies are toxic .
@mithileshchakravarty3883 Жыл бұрын
Tumhare logic se to dhruv rathee ko bhi animal ke against video nahi banani chahiye thi, animal ne kya German shepherd ko personally Target Kiya tha?😂 Flawed logic
@Swiftreaders4668 Жыл бұрын
@@mithileshchakravarty3883animal movie hai uspe koi bhi comment kar sakta hai...... But dhruv is just a you tuber. Shan made content about dhruv not on animal 😂😂😂😂
@Kj1895oj Жыл бұрын
Like you cherry picking and having bias in your review of Kho gaye hum kaha?
@harsh8499 Жыл бұрын
According to me, this video is more of a criticism of DHRUV RATHEE and not of his Analysis regarding ANIMAL MOVIE. You are making your point just on the basis of his past collaborative videos which might prove HIM (Dhruv) a hypocrite but does not make your point regarding the dhruv's analysis SENSELESS. After watching your video, we can only conclude that In addition to ANIMAL MOVIE, Gangs of Wasseypur, Death Note, etc are also CANCER. Suppose that review of animal movie was made by some other creator then you had no counter since you did not made any point about how the movies like ANIMAL are NOT cancer to our society. Just because Manoj Bajpayee told that it does not influence the youth's behaviour, it doesn't prove that it will not. He is just another fellow actor who himself makes such movies so how can he himself say the BITTER TRUTH. Also, your point regarding TARGET AUDIENCE is baseless because in today's generation, there is little-to-no difference between a 14 yr kid and a 25 yr boy who have very little control over their emotions and are tend to follow the SO-Called "Internet Trends."
@sahilshirsat3949 Жыл бұрын
Are you dumb; dude he said ki usne call out Kiya hai dusre video me ye video sirf counter hoga toh dhruv rathee 😵💫 incomplete video dekh ke mat pass Karo comments
@theKrishnaMale Жыл бұрын
Dhruv promoted more toxic movies than ANIMAL okk
@harsh8499 Жыл бұрын
@@theKrishnaMale Brother the topic is not DHRUV RATHEE, the topic is his analysis about Animal movie which is 100% correct. After seeing this video we MAY conclude that Dhruv is a hypocrite but his opinion on animal review IS NOT senseless at all. In fact i wonder what would have been the case if some other creator would pointed out the toxicity of animal movie
@theKrishnaMale Жыл бұрын
@@harsh8499 if he cares for society and people,, then why he promoted such films and called them classic cult movie,, he could have reject this promotion,, ask him why in DM
@harsh8499 Жыл бұрын
@@theKrishnaMale are you not understanding my point? The thing is even if he is hypocrite but his views regarding the animal movie is 100% correct acc to me. IT is not about dhruv rathee, it is about such violent movies with no msg at the end which promote nothing but toxicity at its best.
@UniversalLuv444 Жыл бұрын
Shan Is One Of The Intelligent KZbinrs I Have Seen, The Way He Puts Logic With Knowledge Is Mind Blowing 🙏🏻🔥
@rishavrai99999 Жыл бұрын
U do know that neil deGrasse is also on KZbin😅
@nishant54 Жыл бұрын
He is scientist fool not a youtuber@@rishavrai99999
@rafianatuni7694 Жыл бұрын
I felt the same way watching Druv's video because I clearly remembered him promoting these other such violent movies with Netflix. And yes, I agree with Manoj sir that movies just influence a hairstyle, not people's personality. Thank you for this well spoken video. ❤ People need to stop imaging children watching and thinking what will be the impact on their mind because this movie isnt for kids. 😂
@Sadworld-0711 Жыл бұрын
hey, are you sure films don't change people's mindset and thoughts 🤔 I think films change mindset if you like any movie and decided to change your hairstyle your mindset also will be change according to the movie... after watching wasepur people started repeating its dialog publicly and that was abusive words.. the 3rd class language that youth used on a daily basis comes from movies only !! larki pata lenge types of words they learn from movies.. love story type Bollywood movies directly change our society
@TheCatAndTheArt Жыл бұрын
People need to rewatch what Dhruv said and what this guy is saying line by line and you guys will find out this guy just opposed for the sake of it, not at all been able to prove Dhruv wrong. :P
@krisskross6074 Жыл бұрын
@@TheCatAndTheArt Stop spamming every comment. We get it, you are butt licker of that german shepherd.😆😆
@No_One1231 Жыл бұрын
Regarding change of mindset through movie/series, the best example is fake feminism promoted in the series like 4 more shots, made in heaven etc etc. and people are getting influenced by these movies/series.
@Sadworld-0711 Жыл бұрын
@@No_One1231 you are absolutely right, if you remember kerela story movie.. because of this movie people started arguing and even fighting for Hindu Muslim community and the movie was so popular that's why it dubbed in all languages.. The BJP party was promoting this movie like their own house movie .. each and every popular movie affects our society and mindsets very effectively it's 💯% sure
@RiteshKumarPanda Жыл бұрын
11:01 this is an L opinion if you think films do not change society if films do not change society why make films that challenges societal norms ? have good films ever affected you to be a better person ? have you watched a film about women struggles and made you respect them more ? have you watched Taare zameen Par and your views on children with disabilities changed ? have you watched border and your respect for the army increased ? if yes , if films can have positive impact on you why can't it have Negative impact on you ? you just do not realise it if no . I do not know what to tell you
@shivamgusain51859 ай бұрын
Impact and changing society are two very very different things dude ramayan bhi dus baar TV pe telecast ho chuki hai kaun ladka prabhu shri ram ban gya kaun ladki sita ban gyi ladkiya toh nange ghumne ko women empowerment se relate krti hai so shows and movies doesn't change society iron man dekh ke maine bhi socha tha ki billionaire bnunga aur apna suit bnaunga ise kehte hai impact but guess what mujhe pta hai main 100 saal me bhi nhi bna paunga 😂 impact krna aur logo ka woh cheez sachme kr dene me bhut farak hota hai.
@RiteshKumarPanda9 ай бұрын
@@shivamgusain5185 society is made up of individuals and it doesn't change in seconds . It takes generations we are living in a society which is influenced by cinema form the last decades and what cinema we support today will contribute to generations ahead. You may not have become iron man but I am pretty sure the film influenced 1000s of people to become actors , engineers etc etc. Ramayan is a story of people who we should aspire to be , it is impossible to meet that standard but we should implement small things and learnings to our life . It's the matter of what we are promoting And what are normalising Ramayan or Animal
@RiteshKumarPanda9 ай бұрын
@@shivamgusain5185 aur Iron man ne tumhe impact kiya but your Motivation was wrong that's why your resolution was weak and that's why you gave up . If you were inspired by Tony Starks character of Contestants improvement and confidence, to change yourself for greater good no matter how hard it is . you too can do great things . Films like Animal are also important to see what we shouldn't become , i don't have a problem with that . I believe the Mahabharata is filled with characters we should never be and actions we should never take . It's how we perceive them is what makes the difference . If Kabir Singh and Ranvijay is our modern day heroes whom we should celebrate then I am disappointed with society
@shivamgusain51859 ай бұрын
@@RiteshKumarPanda ramayan has been telecasting on TV for like 4 generations still no shri ram and when u say that it's impossible to become Lord rama why do u assume it's easy to become ranvijay? U have no logic in ur statements at all. Ram nhi ban skte lekin ranvijay jaise criminal ban skte hai wow aisa hai toh gangs of wasseypur dekh ke log ganster kyu nhi bne game of thrones dekh ke logo ne incest kyu nhi shuru kr diya after all game of thrones romanticizes incest yeh nhi hai kya ganda effect. Kisi ne incest shuru nhi kiya game of thrones ko dekh ke u know why bcz it's fiction and logo ko pta hai yeh galat hai. I also thought of being an engineer bro so that i can make a suit bcz I knew I had to do this to make a suit then I realized it's not that easy u can't just make urself as smart as tony Stark just by thinking movie se impact hota hai lekin movie dekh ke koi kuch nhi kr skta abhi maidaan aayi hai kya guarantee hai ki maidaan dekhne ke baad india fifa world Cup jeet jaega? Hai koi guarantee?
@shivamgusain51859 ай бұрын
@@RiteshKumarPanda man ur just so dumb that is my point ki main 100% iron man jaisa khud ko nhi bna skta just bcz I had a good impact of his character on me i used to find him badass and cool that's why I liked him and I thought me being like him would also make me cool this is what I thought but then again I'm not him he's just a fictional character I can never be like tony at all bcz I'm not him as simple as that and this is my statment just bcz u find some character badass and cool doesn't mean ur gonna become like them when u grow up its not that easy gosh people like u man bhains ke aage been bajana.
@tuheensharma2296 Жыл бұрын
Awesome bro.. A tight slap on hypocrisy.. Proud of you Shan..🤗❤️
@msredcurtains Жыл бұрын
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@tuheensharma2296 Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains At first only he said that he is not going to take any side or will he defame Dhruv.. And I also said "slap on hypocrisy not Dhruv.." So I hope you got the answer? It is nothing personal bro.. Take care
@NileshVithlani-yf6wq Жыл бұрын
@@msredcurtains You want a proof that animal is good for scoiety, Then read this 1) Even if Ranbir kapoor had e terrible relationship with his father in this film, As and when he came to know about the attempt to murder of his father, He left everything and came to him. 2) Ranbir slept with tripti dimri in this film and rashmika was not aware about it. Still he told her that thing, and left Tripti dimri with respect that she can go anywhere . 3) If you have seen ranbir with his child, He has treated him with all love and care that means he has not passed the same experience to his son which he has felt in his childhood. 4) And last, If you think Revenge taken by ranbir was wrong, then let me remind you how our judicial system is strong enough to punish the real criminals.
@abhishekdarjee7069 Жыл бұрын
Same it's like saying Violent game is bad for children. Then ban gta6. Grow up guys
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Shaan ki bhi payment ho gai
@soumyamallick80 Жыл бұрын
U r nowadays hitting out of the park by your awesome analysis!!!
@beingpras Жыл бұрын
I haven't watched the movie so don't have much to say about it. But from the information I've collected, the problem is with the director glorifying the violence in the film. And the audience in the theatres that are applauding the problematic scenes.
@liveanimelfy1516 Жыл бұрын
You have to watch the movie to know the full context. Take it as a movie where te character is grey instead of black and white.
@snowdropquotes1100 Жыл бұрын
Bro I'm a big fan of Dhruv but you left me speech less
@pointythecactus5469 Жыл бұрын
Bro try following unbiased creators He can make good content But he praise people who pay him From politicians to movies
@bpwinces Жыл бұрын
It was disappointing how you didn't tackle anything to what Dhruv said by RELATING it to the actual film! I was waiting only for that, but smh. All you did was call out on how he liked similar projects in the past and that's about it. I only watched Death Note from that list and THE REASON why that show is celebrated is not because of the so-called "kiddish" level violence BUT because of how CLEVERLY the story was written. Classic cop chasing robber but both were superbly at par with each other in the game. THAT'S what made the show memorable. I was waiting for you to point the same from ANIMAL but you didn't. So that only means it doesn't have much to offer. 🤷🏻♀️ Death Note wasn't "cool" with violence, it was smart and very REAL- what happens to Light at the end of Death Note? What happens to Joker at the end? Does the same happen in Animal? If its an anti-hero then TREAT the character like an anti-hero and NOT as a "hero".
@sahilshirsat3949 Жыл бұрын
Jokes on you death note's story is completed, animal just completed the first installment don't put your opinions without knowing facts
@bpwinces Жыл бұрын
@@sahilshirsat3949 I'm sorry, it's not on me :) The point is that Light is the villain of that story while L is the hero. If you can relate this to ANIMAL then we'll talk. And EVEN if the series "completes" with him being the villain (which I highly doubt), it certainly failed to do it in the first installment- and that's a fact.
@dharmeshparikh7837 Жыл бұрын
@@bpwinceswhat about Gangs of Vasseypur and all other movies which he promoted. Don't defend Rathee's one sided hypocritical views.
@bpwinces Жыл бұрын
@@dharmeshparikh7837 I defended ONLY for death note because that was a true 'non-violent' masterpiece! Besides, what druv argued is still true regardless of what he's promoting. So if you agree that he shouldn't have promoted those movies, then you are also indirectly AGREEING that ANIMAL is a film of the same category, so it shouldn't be promoted either. We're on the same page 👍🏼
@dharmeshparikh7837 Жыл бұрын
@@bpwinces if I would start arguing based on that, then sorry, I have to ban many of the oscar winning movies of Martin Scorsese and legendary directors. If you think that there should be no influence of adultery, violence, etc, then ban every freaking movie that has blood, adultery, etc. Because even if you are not specifically glorifying, that scene person can take inspiration from any scene of the movie. It's not necessarily a condition that a mentally challenged person will only be inspired if that scene was glorified. One girl in the West took inspiration from Joker ( Nolan movie) and committed a horrific crime. Even in movies, if a hero is murdering the assassination of bad character, the way the hero murders any criminal can take inspiration. So stop this morality argument. It's ridiculous. Maximum casualties that happened during the earlier half of the 20th century ( 150 millions) tell me how many violent, toxic movies were made during that time. If you have problems with violence,adultery, toxic behavior , racism then condemn every freaking movie, which consists of that. And if I want to be triggered, I can find any reason to be triggered . Ban every James bond movie, Terminator franchise, ban S.A.W, wrong turn, ban Fight club, ban Blood diamond etc. We might also have to ban Indian movies/series like Raman Raghav, Satya, Sacred Games, Mirzapur, etc, because they also not only showed violance but also glorified that. In short, ban the whole movie industry. Either take pure moral position and make movies like Chak de India, Tare Zameen par, A beautiful mind etc, all the time without any sort of bad influence with social messaging. Otherwise, allow all sorts of movies. I don't like this double standard hypocritical attitude of people. In the last 20-30 years middle east has faced millions of casualties due to their own infighting ,bombings, and many more sort of crimes, including sexual assaults. If you compare those casualties with reference to these movies influence on people, then it's not even a drop in the whole water tank. This same thing, on a far huge scale, was there when the world had no toxic movies at all or movie access at all in the 19th and 20th centuries. So don't argue for that, it's very narrow and weak argument.
@prod_yadhu Жыл бұрын
You can't get influenced by Gangs of Wasseypur because that movie shows the reality nothing more than life and people didn't get influenced by just watching real life raw action but people do get influenced by movie which shows a character, a story more than life. Don't compare the classics with just released movies.
@chandrabhansingh6778 Жыл бұрын
Iska matlab tu animal movie dekh kar influence ho gaya he
@adityashastri1035 Жыл бұрын
@@chandrabhansingh6778haa maine bhi animal dekhi Maine influence hoke murder nahi kiya 😂 chutiya😂
@deependerkadian5524 Жыл бұрын
Most illogical thing i ever read
@AnkushKumar-qr6hl Жыл бұрын
@@deependerkadian5524same here bro😅😅😅 yehi to hain jo WHATS APP UNIVERSITY de study krke Dhruv lohru k fudu Andhwaqt fans bnte hain 😅😅😅
@asmitashaw9156 Жыл бұрын
He may be biased, but on the Gangs of Wasseypur vs Animal comparison bit, how are we completely missing out on the fact that both movies have entirely different messages. The whole point of Gangs of Wasseypur was to convey that violence and criminal ways can never lead to a happy ending. Morever, nothing of this was glamorized in Gangs of Wasseypur. It's not wrong to portray a dark side but it's glamorization is.
@kSree7 Жыл бұрын
Not really. They glamorized a lot of things in Gangs. That is very subjective measure too.
@mariapauline8732 Жыл бұрын
Rightly said. In those movies it does not glorify the criminal activity
@sneharachha5238 Жыл бұрын
Exactly @asmitashaw9156
@coolakash100 Жыл бұрын
This has to be one of the most structured, well researched and greatly orated videos I have ever seen. Much respect brother!
@Awakenbeing Жыл бұрын
Well I do believe that cinema and media introduces changes in our societies. I don't agree with Manoj Vajpayee, he is a good actor but not a good observer. Cinema and media culture bring the traits that is very well followed by youth, like seeking and making relationship, stalking, gang-war, embracing smoking, alcohol and party culture. Now Toxic male and female will be adorn by youth. Pyaar sabne sahrukh khan se hi sikha hai.
@satyambhardwaj3938 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathee is an absolute cherry picker, hamesha question unhi chizo ko krta jo uske narrative mein fit baithte hai
@UniversalLuv444 Жыл бұрын
That Last Line Was Savage By Shan😂❤ A Film Genre Is Not Somebody's Character Certificate 🎥
@ShivamYadav-0194 ай бұрын
Bhai Gangs of Wasseypur, Breaking Bad and Death Note ,,inn sab shows me Negative Characters ke saath last me Bura hi hua ha...means Death... But it's not the Case in ANIMAL,, So fark to hai dono me bro...
@Mrjollly8284 ай бұрын
Money heist mei Chori karne vale character ko bhi positive light mei potray kiya gya tha aur Dhruv ne usse bhi promote Kiya tha. Iska matlab jinko "Money heist " pasand hai voh Chori karne valo ko support karte hai? Nai na? Same logic goes for Animals
@harmindersabharwal_2019Ай бұрын
Par yeh kiska rule hai ki villain ke saath bura aur hero ke saath acha hota hai is this a boundary of cinema then how would you explain the charcters in savid fincher’s films
@Optimistic_aspirant Жыл бұрын
This video is actually good Shan .. Even I liked the movie Animal - for the acting, direction, bgm and hall experience. That's it. I am not taking any toxicity shown in the movie to my home or letting any negativity shown , hamper my way of thinking or behaving.