Shape or materials? Which is more important for modern stealth planes?

[@Binkov]

For NordVPN’s 8th birthday, every purchase of a 3 year plan will get you 1 additional month free AND a surprise gift. Go to nordvpn.com/binkov and use our coupon binkov at checkout.

[@pyeitme508]

Thanks!

[@JesusKnowsAllComeToHim]

WW3 Nato+Eu+Japan Asean South Korea Australia New Zeland and Israel vs Csto Sco Arab league BRICS and North Korea + all Sco Observer applicants And Observer members

[@JesusKnowsAllComeToHim]

Russia vs Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Greenland

[@JesusKnowsAllComeToHim]

Usa vs China and Eu(with Uk)

[@JesusKnowsAllComeToHim]

Eu (with uk) vs China arena war

[@recklessroges]

"Stealth is important" [sponsorship arrives unexpectedly] Sun Tzu approves.

[@iamscoutstfu]

That was the stealthiest advertising segue I've ever seen.

[@thomas.02]

i know country vs country videos created this channel, but these documentaries on real-life technologies are what's keeping us old fans coming back (at least that's my opinion).

[@andrewsmall6834]

I would disagree, i get very excited when i see a new binkov video and then very disappointed when it isn't country vs country and thus end up skipping it entirely. Each to their own though.

[@jascrandom9855]

This is by far the most informative video regarding Stealth technology ever.

[@_datapoint]

This has been one of THEE best videos on stealth I have seen yet. I learned something new like how the radar waves can actually travel along the skin almost like water can run along the underside of a flat surface, in small quantities and that's why the F-35's nose looks the way it does. Fascinating.

[@drdzdd]

Great transition to your sponsor!, I've not seen it coming. (Stealth transition)

[@GJ_DM]

I really enjoy these more in depth videos discussing aspects of warfare not well understood by many. You should produce more of these type of videos going forward. I really love the war scenario videos but you can only do so many scenarios before they start becoming gratuitous and less interesting.

[@starchild692]

This golf ball analogy is a popular misconception. The plane won't reflect the same radar return from every angle cause its shape is diffirent than a ball. In fact from some angles the reflections of the same plane could go from this "golf ball" to a house size.

[@Kman31ca]

Yup, mission planning and managing your emissions returns is key. Gotta wonder if the stealth jets have their own sensors that will give the pilot cues on how to position their plane vs real time threats. Sure they have something just never heard of or looked into it really.

[@starchild692]

@@Kman31ca Penetration missions are planned ahead with recon and intelligence gathering about all potential threats and their location to determin the optimal flight path. But after all in combat everything is possible, unexpected shit can occur then the pilot asses the situation and decide.

[@kathrynck]

@@Kman31ca The F-35 has extremely comprehensive sensors and data sharing across many platforms, as well as a streamlined pilot VR interface to keep the pilot as well informed as possible. Avoiding giving radar stations (and possibly angles between split radar emiters/recievers) a broadside view of your flat surfaces is key. Plus avoiding giving IR platforms an up-skirt view as well. Low level flight helps immensely though, which is why the F-35 has such a high wing loading, it's very resistant to vertical wind sheer, making treetop level flight safer than most planes.

[@casbot71]

Do Nord Vs Dashlane … If _you_ can be impartial

[@h1017412]

Please could you do some African conflicts. I keep asking, surely I'm not the only one?

[@okiedokie6595]

@War Wolf I mean , Egypt ( an African country) is among the top 10 strongest militaries soooo

[@HawkPlatinum]

The entire surface of the F-35 is designed to serve as a transmitter/receiver. They are also meant to fly 3-4 at a time in order to enhance their ability. The plane is in an entirely different class and function even to the F-22.

[@innocentpasserby9632]

now that's what i call smooth Ads transition

[@flyenaodla376]

What Ad, I did not see one

[@SuperSirianRigel]

B-2 bomber is simply cool. If you aren't paying attention and you look up and see one flying over all of a sudden you likely to go, "What the heck is that!?" Before realizing what it is a few seconds later. lol

[@rolandjosef7961]

I think the next Challenge in the Fighter Jet design is how to get rid of the Loud noise it generates in the sky.

[@spartannerd1]

appreciate the level of detail and the accommodating imagery. Great job as usual comrade! One aspect to consider is only technology advanced countries with large budgets can afford stealth. These being Nato countries, Russia, and China. Other countries will in the future focus on defeating stealth given the large expenses with plane design and production.

[@davidmills6203]

that was the greatest segway into the sponsor. how long were were you planning this for? its perfect!

[@acardenasjr1340]

Thanks for this, people really needed to know what stealth actually means and not the movies 😂

[@WildBillCox13]

A 1st rate presentation. Liked and shared. Thanks for posting, Binkov!

[@rafaellastracom6411]

Hands down the best video I have seen on the subject. Excellent work!

[@jmirsp4z]

very smooth ad transition :D

[@moonbear2130]

Good video looks like you put a lot of work and research into it

[@mickeyg7219]

Low-frequency bands are effective against stealth, and works in less desirable weathers and is long-ranged, but it have limitations: mobility of the radar platform, resolution (accuracy and precision). Extremely high-frequency bands, even higher than the X-Band are also effective against stealth, but it also have limitations: short-range, power consumption, susceptibility to weathers, and modern stealth planes can deal with it. That's why air defense is no substitute for a good air force. Modern stealth planes carry standoff weapons, and use its advanced ESM to stay away from the radar. So you have to invest a lot in the radar placement, which will eventually add up and become just as expensive as procuring a lot of stealth planes. Early warning radars can detect stealth planes at longer ranged, but it doesn't have the accuracy to guide missiles, so even if it cue its findings to the engagement radar, it may still not be able to shoot the stealth plane down since engagement/fire control radars use X and C-Bands, which stealth planes optimized against, it simply doesn't have the range to get a lock even if surveillance and early warning radars knew the general direction of the plane. Basically, you can see the stealth plane, but unless it fly close to you, you won't be able to do anything about it. That's why it's important to also invest in procuring interceptor aircraft, because any competent pilot of the stealth plane will stay outside the range of the engagement/fire control radars. If your early warning/surveillance radar detected a stealth plane, but enemy's stealth plane is too far away for your engagement/fire control radar and missiles to reach, you have to send your interceptor aircraft.

[@bogdanbogdanoff5164]

Stealth aircraft also lose a lot in different aspects, because of their construction. First of all, with their price (and in particular the total monopoly of Lockheed Martin in the west, that drives the price through the roof) most air forces are unable to replace 4th generation fighters with nearly the same numbers of F-35. Quantity has a quality of it's own, and that means every loss is a powerful blow to their user. Secondly, weapon bays. They not only impact aerodynamic performance, relying on them means that your total missile load is less than half of a F-15 or Su-27. Opponent's planes can go turn around when shot at, waste your ammo (they are able to escape thanks to their overall better energy perfomance), and simultainously return fire with a bigger quantity of missiles. After one exchange, the side employing stealth fighters can be already out of ammunition. The impact of construction on the energy and maneuvrability can be mitigated in different ways, and 2-engined fighters will be vastly superior here. So flying like a brick is more of a problem of a single plane (single engine F-35), than the whole concept.

[@mickeyg7219]

@@bogdanbogdanoff5164 Fair point, but the F-35 has a similar thrust-to-weight ratio to the F-16 when adjusted for the fuel capacity, it's no flying brick, many pilots pointed out that the F-35's kinematic performance is very similar to the F/A-18, allowing it to perform a certain post-stall maneuver that F-15 and F-16 can't, thanks to its all-moving horizontal tails. And at least from a rough calculation, it seems to be able to out-accelerate the SU-27 in subsonic region. Stealth planes' overall design is not as aerodynamic as non-stealth planes of a similar capability, but it's somewhat offset by a lack of parasitic drag from external load. The F-22 can carry as much air-to-air missiles as a Eurofighter, and the F-35 will have the Sidekick installed sometimes in early-to-mind 2020s, allowing it carry up to 6 AMRAAM equivalent internally in total. Non-stealth fighters will have to carry weapons externally, creating drag and higher radar return, and the increased drag and weight will reduce the range of the aircraft. That's why F-18, F-16, and F-15 never actually filled their hardpoints in combat because they can't get a meaningful range out of it. There's no point carrying 10 guns if you can only hobble it for a short distance. Also, the stealth plane can get into the range of its missile's no-escape zone against opponent's non-stealth aircraft, allowing a high probability of hit. BVR is mostly useful against large aircraft, such as bombers, AWACS, and tankers. Against fighter-sized targets, it must get closer, and to reduce the chance of your enemy employing the same tactic, having a stealth plane is a good idea.

[@oguzhancan5477]

@@mickeyg7219 Stealth aircrafts should be used as intercepters, i agree. But they are too expensive to be a front-line fighter. If it's all up to WVR, stealthiness has no mean. Their duty should be intercepting by getting close before being detected and supporting agile, cheap (that's why many) fighters to start their close combat. Fighter mafia members once simulated a close combat between F-15's and F-5's that are worth the same price in total. For example 1 F-15 vs 10 F-5. And F-5 was the winner. Higher quality and price is defeat in this incident. So there must be diversity among aircrafts. If a stealth aircraft is requested to carry more weapon by compromising stealthines why is this aircraft exist in the first place? There are so many aircraft can carry tons of weapons without stealth feature. In future combat rules may change. Laser weapons may chance everything we think about WVR. But fundamental rules will remain same, if the aircraft is more agile it's ability to survive a missile is more. A fronline fighter also doesn't need to much weapons because in combat with 200 fighters launching missiles each other, probably aircrafts won't be flying for long. They should face the enemy with agile characteristics and get support from the interceptors with their long-range missiles. Surviving fighters can get fuel from a tanker, this isn't a big deal after managing a combat.

[@bogdanbogdanoff5164]

@@mickeyg7219 By brick I meant excessive energy bleed during maneuvers. If the lightning 2 has to turn tail and dodge a BVR missile, it likely won't climb back into the fight because of how inferior it is in this department. Comparing it to a viper really doesn't help your case, as it is also not an energy fighter, but a one engine multirole. It is a one trick pony, and the expensive trick it does is under a threat of multiple technical ways to detect it, which can be perfected at any time of it's service. And they project it to serve for 30 years?? Thanks lockheed, my greatest ally

[@soloqueuepixy]

@@bogdanbogdanoff5164 wanna know how i can tell you didn't read the post you replied to jk you obviously walked in with the clueless notion that f35s are one-trick ponies so it's not like explaining anything to you a second time would matter

[@hac9336]

Nice transition to NordVPN :D

[@kathrynck]

I expected to have to correct 1001 things in this video. But I don't. Only thing I'd add is that the proliferation of IRST as a detection method puts a kind of range limit on stealth (at least for jet planes). As such, the F-35 is designed with a moderately weaker focus on RCS than the F-22. Only other possible additions being that stealth influence on designs in the US actually date back to the 1950's. The F-106 for example, has a shockingly small and well managed RCS. And the F-117's angular surface is actually kinda terrible, since triangular edges are much worse than bi-angular edges at re-radiation, and it's about as aerodynamically sound as a flying brick.

[@destinolol6983]

Gg

[@СергейСимонов-й2г]

Great job Binkov. One of the most ineresting foreign channels about weapons. Although im able to uderstand only 80%, what are you talking about, because of the language (im russian), i love your channel for your almost perfect diction. I learn english, watching your videos. Благодарю за труд! Отличный голос и дикция.

[@thomas.02]

funny how Binkov may speak your language but for the sake of international appeal we're all using English (i'm not a native English speaker).

[@lemmonsinmyeyes]

You did a ton of research on this! Great job dude !

[@mako2350]

Basically you are discussing High PRF vs Low PRF if I remember my military training. PRF is what we called it anyway.. for example High PRF is fire control Radar, Low PRF is Surveillance Radar... For those that don't know PRF is Pulse Repetition Factor...

[@JohnDoe-hs1jp]

Hey man, you seem to have not colored the Isle of Man blue during the intro of the video.

[@lancelotgohel8460]

Hi ! This video is one of the best I've seen on this subjet and I'm really interested in stealth tech. For an oral exam next year I'm planning to talk about stealth technologies and your video is a good source for me. Could you give some of your sources so I can expand my knowledge on the subject ? Thanks, also keep on with the good work (am French, so I'm sorry if I made mistakes)

[@Julle399]

Go into the literature and learn physics

[@lancelotgohel8460]

@@Julle399 I wanna go in engineering newt year but I have to finish high school (French here ) and I need to find the litterature you are talking about. That's why I am asking for a wee bit of help

[@freedomvanguard8185]

S-70 Okhotnik: exists US fighter pilot: it's a free real -estate- practice target

[@rigormortis6481]

Mebbe from the rear aspect ?

[@freedomvanguard8185]

@@rigormortis6481 do you mean that s70 is like a flying dee1-doh and a us pilot would like to stick that in their bum or what?

[@rigormortis6481]

@@freedomvanguard8185 don't understand the jargon used. But yeah, frontally and sometimes that is all that matters for a drone, S 70 , especially 4 S 70's with a Su 57 looks good. Well, ofc the US has something better, mebbe yes. But still more than good enough.

[@freedomvanguard8185]

​@@rigormortis6481 Aahah, okay, nevermind that ;) They may look good, but please, don't forget that basically, Su 57 is made around an old soviet-era tech, such as mig 29 or similar. Also, those birds will never get into mass production because russia is a 3rd world country (huge? duh) with resource-based economy, incapable of a modern manufacturing. It's a miracle that it somehow managed to copicat chinese j20 and a us drone

[@rigormortis6481]

@@freedomvanguard8185 umm..wot ? I wuldn't really say who copied what. That much is pretty apparent and known. Regardless, continue to underestimate whatever whoever. Yeah, looks good; and in a couple of years will carry, say around 3000 kg of ordinance. Looks REAL good then yeah !

[@SHOTbyGUN]

When I google RAM, all I get is goat videos and when I google stealth, all I get is some fucking skyrim videos.

[@Desrtfox71]

Instead of RAM use Radar Absorbing Material. Instead of Stealth, use Low-observable. Of course, I believe the original comment to be a joke.

[@rmelotto]

One of the best explanations so far

[@rvs55]

Well what we're seeing is passive stealth. There's also the concept of active stealth, with wave cancellation techniques being used to defeat enemy radar by emitting an out-of-phase signal back at the emitter. But I think that would require a very powerful and very fast computer onboard the aircraft to analyze the incoming wave and quickly emit the cancelling wave back at the emitter. Probably not feasible at this moment. Perhaps when quantum computer become more widely available, and in more compact form factors. But if this could be done, we would not have to deal with performance or aerodynamic compromises. You could put this equipment into something like a Su-35 or F-15 and make it invisible. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050919302170

[@riorazzer1090]

That's exactly US stealth tech had adopted,, Active STEALTH is a RADAR JAMMING capability.. only SUPER COMPUTER/ AVIONIC and powerful RADAR can do that's TASK..

[@rvs55]

@@riorazzer1090 Not radar jamming. That's been around for a long time. ECM. Broadcast signals and white noise over the radar's frequency to produce false returns. But everybody knows you're around once you've flipped on the ECM. And missiles such as the HARM can be designed to home-on-jam. I'm talking about real-time analysis and processing of an incoming radar signal, and then emitting back an out-of-phase signal to cancel out the returns. No one knows you're there.

[@Kman31ca]

That was a great analysis on stealth tech. Bravo!

[@subtitleaddict5343]

CELAC(Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) vs USA

[@michaelestala9214]

US: F-22’s F-35’s, B-2’s, B-21’s and all of the US Stealth Drones!!!! Russian/Chinese/Iran/North Korea: Oh my!

[@LOL-zu1zr]

Michael Estala stealth drones are used for refueling only so far. China and Russia both has stealth technology.

[@jadersolano3080]

Chengdu J 20/ sukhoi pak fa // shenyang J31 coff coff

[@aftmalone4644]

LOL 1000 But they are still far behind the US in terms of technology. China steals most of their technology, but reverse engineering doesn’t mean they’ve truly understand and mastered the techniques needed to perfect it. Russia has fantastic engineering capabilities (My money would be on a Pak-FA over a J-20 any day) but because of economic issues they aren’t able to put the resources needed to mass produce their aircraft. A J-20 was detected by an Indian (Russian designed) Su-30 in 2018.

[@jadersolano3080]

Dallin Shepherd i know f35 is invencible even there are some black stealth hawks around there. B2 is also one of the best in its kind.

[@michaelestala9214]

J-20 was detected but India fighters and ground radar, the SU-57 has also been detected by Israeli radars, I wouldn’t say China and Russia are close to a stealth fighter

[@Autechltd]

Stealth is for virgins. If it was me, I'd make an aircraft that would amplify its radar cross section to the point where the enemy would think they are being invaded by the alien saucer from Independence Day.

[@Tcman95]

You made me laugh

[@appa609]

They'll just think you're AWACS.

[@claxvii177th6]

Dear lord, your content is absolute gold

[@vovochen]

,,Very, very good, very impressive." -Vovochen

[@stoobe]

Surprised much of this wasn't classified! Great video!

[@thelovertunisia]

Amazing as usual Comissar. Thumbs up!

[@jasonc5781]

Pretty decent video on stealth without diving too deep into technicalities. Reminds me of some parts from the 3 parts stealth article I read on AW&ST a while back. Could have used a little explanation on "Full aspect Vs partial aspect" stealth... or another video on it 🤔

[@valenrn8657]

F-22 uses both special foam, radar absolution coating, and high carbon composite materials. F-35 Lot 4 uses both special CNT (carbon-nanotube) meta-materials and radar absolution coating.

[@Kman31ca]

@DarkAgit Backup No one has made that claim. It just gives stealth planes the advantage of being able to see the enemy far further away than they see you.

[@soloqueuepixy]

@@Kman31ca "immortal to radars" is particularly amusing because it looks like it's saying that f35s can now be cooked by radar

[@Tom_Hadler]

Since a radar wave is detected by reflecting back perpendicular to the source radar emitting the signal, by linking several radars to a computer system to be able to receive data from each other could you not increase visibility of aircraft, even stealthy? They could triangulate from their various locations to obtain fairly accurate position surely? With the right software surely you could perform 'machine learning' and learn various radar signatures and be able to get a sufficient position and trajectory for even targeting, by linking all the various radar and different bandwidths of available radar. All you need is a significant network of radar stations. So good for national air defences, but even in foreign territory have several dispersed radar units. Am I missing something critical here? Wouldn't this make stealth almost useless?

[@motmontheinternet]

The cost of actually saturating an area with radar coverage to the degree you're proposing might see through stealth most of the time, but then an enemy will just start building $15million drones that can be economically sacrificed by throwing them into the grinder. So long as they destroy some of the radar coverage then the stealth is suddenly applicable again and the enemy spent less to destroy the radars than you spent building them. Also, because you are firing missiles at the drones, you are telling the enemy where your missile launchers are located. In reality these radars are used to help defend key positions.

[@Tom_Hadler]

motmontheinternet Yes not an unreasonable point you make! Whatever technology exists there'll always be ways to try and counter it. And then there's a way to counter the counter. And so it goes, ad infinitum....

[@kathrynck]

Yes. Except for the targeting part. Not sure how much is wise to say on that topic. But your comment kinda defines much of the escalation process in this arena. Ultimately it's a measures & countermeasures spending arms race. If you have more money to work with, or you deploy a measure who's countermeasure is more costly than the measure, you're playing to win.

[@glebovskimalcovich207]

Nice, now I want to see stealth capability analysis of the current stealth fighter based on open saurce data.

[@Algan209]

Turque vs Syria

[@petersmythe6462]

One interesting question is whether networked planes could stand far apart so that one could listen for diffuse returns while the other broadcasts radar. This would seem to defeat most techniques shown here.

[@greg1156]

Do Liechtenstein vs the rest of the world

[@skybattler2624]

Rest of the world declares war on Liechtenstein. Switzerland uses blackmail, Power of Money ability activates, turning it into Global Revolution It's Super Effective. Rest of the World faints.

[@pit5000]

i want to design my own stealth jet now...

[@ZaGaijinSmash]

Please do UK vs Japan! Their spending is similar, but the British forces are much more geared to offence than Japan. British can use regional bases to balance manpower.

[@subtitleaddict5343]

Second Korean War(USA+Japan+ROK vs DPRK+Russia+China)

[@miliciades101]

Video about 6th generation fighters

[@phoneticau]

Apprently VHF frequnicies can detect stealth aircraft at longer ranges

[@milisha98]

VHF will get many false positives from weather conditions (e.g. the Davis VHF radar). And even if you do detect a plane, because of the poor resolution you do not know how many planes, what type, or what heading or velocity. You still need a more accurate fire control radar as you cannot fire a missile at where a plane is, but rather you must fire the missile where it's likely to be in order to make a successful intercept. VHF radars are also big and relatively immobile - easy targets. If the Gulf Wars any indication of US operation, early warning radars didn't help the Iraqis. They were blinded or disabled before the air campaign even began. Not that it really mattered as all it could tell the Iraqis were they were stuffed; the skies were full of wild weasles, decoy drones, cruise missiles, jamming aircraft / munitions, and anti-radar munitions that float in the air and destroy any active radars. Meanwhile, the Nighthawks were very successful evading defenses and hitting the heavily defended Republican Guard positions around Baghdad.

[@fuzzylogic5507]

In the final part of the video it is stated that the stealth technology would be composed by shape + shape + material + material but I would reduce the shape to just one and three materials. I found an article about a Soviet mathematician named Pyotr Yakovlevich Ufimtsev, who in 1960s began developing equations for predicting the reflection of electromagnetic waves from simple two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects. Much of Ufimtsev's work was translated into English, and in the 1970s American Lockheed engineers began to expand upon some of his theories to create the concept of aircraft with reduced radar signatures. A stealth engineer at Lockheed, Denys Overholser, had read the publication and realized that Ufimtsev had created the mathematical theory and tools to do finite analysis of radar reflection. This discovery inspired and had a role in the design of the first true stealth aircraft, the Lockheed F-117. Northrop also used Ufimtsev's work to program super computers to predict the radar reflection of the B-2 bomber. So the anterior gives us the idea of how the " shape " into the stealth technology is mature enough, the next is the RAM (Radar Absorbing Materials).

[@sovietunion8158]

You're absolutely right . In fact , Pyotr Ufimtsev is the father of stealth technology . He was , actually , the chief designer of both the F-117A and the B-2 . He defected to the west when his designs ( principals for F-117 , back then Project Have Blue ) were rejected by the Soviet MoD . Back in his time all his equations and research was focused on how to make the aircraft's aerodynamical design to reflect waves .

[@etech2xwon59]

@@sovietunion8158 You are full of crap and you know it as well as most that read your pathetic attempt of propaganda. While he did "develop equations for predicting the reflection of electromagnetic waves from simple two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects", he was in no way affiliated with the design of actual aircraft, and was living in the USSR when the F117 & B2 were designed by Lockheed and Northrop respectively. The fact that the USSR did not realize the possible implications of his work, and allowed his writings to be publicized internationally, was a colossal fuck-up of major proportions." Much of Ufimtsev's work was translated into English, and in the 1970s American Lockheed engineers began to expand upon some of his theories to create the concept of aircraft with reduced radar signatures." Thanks to the SOVIET UNION's blunder, the US has the most stealthy aircraft on the planet.

[@sovietunion8158]

@@etech2xwon59 Stealth is old tech now . Dis you know back in 2017 a Russian Air Force Su-35S had an F-22A Block 40 Raptor on its IRST screen for 11 minutes without the Raptor even being aware of its presence ? And you can read Ufimtsev's biography and watch his documentaries .

[@dumdumbinks274]

@@sovietunion8158 The Raptor was definitely aware of the Su-35S's presence. There was simply no reason to react because we are not at war with each other and it is *never* a 1vs1 situation.

[@sovietunion8158]

@@dumdumbinks274 It was not aware of its presence because the Su-35S had turned of its radar . It detected the Raptor using passive measures ( IRST ) which are undetectable .

[@gm1215]

Next Video: The World vs Coronavirus

[@Irish381]

Skunk works at it's best! B2SPIRIT F-22E RAPTOR,! Ooh rah SEMPER FI carry on 🇺🇸😎😈💀😱💣

[@captainameriking5382]

Great video! Very informative.. thank you!

[@frankpaul2438]

So when will we see the deployment of the next generation radar?

[@edmundprice5276]

hmm, this gets me a thinking, perhaps it might be possible to make a machine that creates false radar signatures so that it looks like in one direction you are being attacked by legions of aircraft that aren't there leaving other areas open to attack

[@bigsav1984]

The allies did something similar to this with chaff and balloons during the d day invasion. They dropped tons of chaff and had reflective balloons far up the coast from normandy to make it look like the main invasion force was coming across there. Here is a link about it en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Day_naval_deceptions#Glimmer_and_Taxable

[@okiedokie6595]

Yea that's what decoys mean

[@lancelotgohel8460]

I think that is also what jamming aircrafts do, the basically send false radar returns

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

Yeah, but you must know exactly what signals to return, because the enemy surely knows what a true radar return looks like. In fact, chaff is becoming less and less effective to confuse missiles, because the missile guidance system takes into account things like the speed of the wave and the Doppler effect. Chaff doesn't move at the same speed as an aircraft, and with that parameter alone, it can be easily filtered out. You can, however, just saturate the everloving fuck of the electromagnetic spectrum, and hope that the enemy is out of anti-radiation missiles.

[@petersmythe6462]

The big problem with lowering the radar cross section by only an order of magnitude using special materials is that diffuse return of a signal is proportional to distance to the fourth power, which increases very rapidly as distance decreases. So that's only really a 44% reduction in detection range. Significant, yes, but not really decisive as an advantage. Roughly the same advantage that wearing dark clothing would give you against an adversary with a flashlight.

[@Tom_Hadler]

Peter Smythe Interesting

[@santiagoperez2094]

44% is a lot when you are flying at mach 1.5

[@Phos9]

Little addition, the F-117 was only faceted because of limitations of then current computer simulations. Only a few years later Northrop had Tacit Blue flying.

[@wadas9042]

Can you make video about russian army strenghts and weaknesses?

[@edoedo8686]

Wow superb! And fascinating...

[@Admiral_Jezza]

Can you do more country vs country battles?

[@briancrane7634]

modern deceptive jammers can copy an incoming pulse then emit a distorted version to the seeker-head on the missile to confuse it...move...counter-move [laser seekers could change the game]

[@19580822]

You are talking about track-breaking radar jammers, and the technology for that is at LEAST 50 years old. It was used in Vietnam as the ALQ-51 and ALQ-100, and later as the ALQ-126.

[@toptiergaming6900]

I have been working on a 6th gen concept and this is somewhat useful

[@LikeUntoBuddha]

Do propellers show up a lot on the radar?

[@pixelpatter01]

yes

[@MetoFulcurm]

12:36 I just noticed that the SR-71 has its tail elements pointing inwards, reflecting any radar way uprwards. Though this thing fly very high.

[@WynnofThule]

That, or downwards directly into more of the plane

[@viviancang7974]

Do a video or Series of time wars like medeaval vs modern or ww2 vs medeaval or germany vs rome or modern US vs 1800 British empire or something like that

[@corrinetsang1478]

The University of vmanchester developed a graphne coating that can absoeb radar signals.

[@lordilluminati5836]

what about variable geometry? would it be practical for a fighter to fold canards/tail into a flying wing config to infiltrate and mask it's RCS and then switch to a mnouverable config to evade missiles, drop bombs, etc?

[@Petrezen1982]

Variable geometry in planes/bombers needs technical parts that have gaps in order to move or extract during heating/flying fast. Gaps are spots for radars to detect.

[@frankcrawford416]

The f-35 is lower rcs than f-22 you are correct binko.

[@shanedoesyoutube8001]

Wait, really??? You sure???

[@Pavlos.Pavlou]

Make a video with SU-70.

[@mightyhadi6132]

Please do Asean VS China

[@kurousagi8155]

China outnumbered ASEAN 2-1 in warships and nearly 5-1 in fighter jets. The only nation in ASEAN with dedicated attack aircraft is Myanmar who is more likely to side with China than fight China. Unfortunately for ASEAN, without Indian or American/Japanese intervention, it’s pretty hopeless.

[@hrvojemikulcic7074]

Can be installed a FLIR camera (range of FLIR camera will be around 20 km-more or less) on radar to measure temperature in the cold air!?

[@mickeyg7219]

20 km is close enough for your normal radar to see the stealth plane. Further than this, you probably need something else.

[@hrvojemikulcic7074]

@Ace of Spades Thanks.

[@hrvojemikulcic7074]

@@mickeyg7219 Can one question? Does helicopter has same stealth radar signature like F 35 or equal signature on radar screen?

[@mickeyg7219]

@@hrvojemikulcic7074 At a close distance, it probably would be equal since the returning radar waves haven't cross enough volume of space to disperse sufficiently. But at a long-range, helicopters should have a higher return due to the spinning blades and other irregularities on the surface.

[@GustavoHenriquedsl]

Do Brazil vs Argentina

[@kurousagi8155]

Brazil would win? Argentina has horrible readiness rates.

[@GustavoHenriquedsl]

@@kurousagi8155 true. And Arg is sabotating their own military, while Brazil bought fighters from Sweden and developing cruise missiles

[@Defender78]

okay odd question - why not add a Phalanx CIWS defense for planes? Like a M134 minigun that is stored in a retractable pod or turret or enclosure, to shoot down incoming missiles?? Like a Trophy or Iron Fist APS system for tanks, but for planes?

[@Leorhit]

I m no expert but i think it's a weight issue. Considering the volume of ammo used by those things when functioning knowing the ballistic accuracy would be decreased shooting from a flying plane.

[@the80386]

due to weight, aero-drag, structural and internal volume considerations

[@thekraken1173]

Maybe for bomber it may work.

[@SithLord2066]

I invented a very high performance heat emitting anti missile system on planes. It puts out a lot of heat, so incoming missiles will melt and fail to hit your airplane. GENIUS!

[@jurisprudens]

Thank You, Binkov

[@user-ym8ic8r]

I want video that korean and Japanese Military Science technology, thier whats plannings and thier capability ex) radar, aegis ships, missiles, F-3,KFX,KDDX,30FFM program and so on

[@SuperSirianRigel]

Korean and Japanese military technology... As far as planes are concerned... Bought U.S. planes. Especially the fighters. lol.

[@andersonanderson1525]

Both derive their fighter jet project heavily from US, copy/reverse engineer

[@juancarrero6652]

You asked at the beginning shape or materials as far as stealth working it's a bit of both but if you can ionize the air around the craft you will go invisible.

[@Sandsteine]

Yeah but if ionize the air around you (plasma) you also staets lighting in some spectrums

[@gamerinthehousepower1671]

I have a question in battle and firefights if a soldier gets shot and dies can normal and i mean normal soldier's not medics tell if he is dead or not because as far as I know all soldier's get some basic medical training but not as much of medical training as medics get is that right or not

[@komdivmaklenskov1105]

Well, if someone is dead, it isn't hard for ANYONE to tell if they are dead. Civilians, you or I, even animals, can tell if someone/something is dead. If the question is "can a standard infantryman provide combat first aid" then the answer is yes, all soldiers have basic first aid, but depending on the severity of the wound, or complications, they will need a combat medic, or a hospital.

[@gamerinthehousepower1671]

@@komdivmaklenskov1105 ok so if a soldier dies in battle the other infantry can tell if the soldier is dead is that right

[@gamerinthehousepower1671]

@@komdivmaklenskov1105 you here

[@yeetus1398]

Can you maybe ever do US and China vs the rest of the World?

[@teddyballgame4823]

The F-35 has an active radar cancellation system. that is why it is more stealthy than the F-22.

[@AndyHage]

If early detection of stealth jets with radar is hard, why not switch over to satellites? Maybe even satellites seeming stationary over a territory? With cameras good enough to measure the length of a person via a shadow a long time ago they should be able to identify what aircraft is flying where. Would heat detection be possible too at near vacuum and what is the range of a heat detector like FLIR? As far as I know there are no stealth jets that don't produce heat while burning through that jet fuel.

[@wowfmomf6126]

Andy Hage nope not good, radar waves interact with few objects in the air so that when an airplane comes in their range it's presence is unique, while visible light interacts with too much stuff making the identification of desired objects hard.

[@soloqueuepixy]

the solution to having trouble locking onto something from a hundred kilometers away is probably not to rely on a platform that's more than thirty thousand kilometers away

[@AndyHage]

@@wowfmomf6126 but detection is the main purpose of long wavelength radars right? And 10 centimeter per pixel should be enough to identify the jet. Locking on is something i didn't think about. Maybe laser guided could help that but that probably doesn't really exist yet on satellites.. so that wouldn't be viable anyways. But it may be a solution?

[@AndyHage]

Thanks both for replying to my question!

[@soloqueuepixy]

​@@AndyHage you need an extremely powerful radar and the means to power it to compensate for the ridiculous increase in distance just so you can get stuck with the task of filtering out even more clutter since instead of pointing a radar up at the sky where you have to figure out what isn't a cloud, you're pointing it down at the ground where you have to filter out approximately everything including the clouds satellite imagery won't help even if it's good enough to see the pilot flip the bird at you. early warning means you want to know what's happening right away, not what happened above the clouds while the sun was up after analyzing all the images heat doesn't give you decent range unless you already know exactly where to look beyond 'somewhere over there', hence why longer-ranged missiles don't rely on heat. laser guidance is the same deal but harsher since you want the laser right on target. both of these are further degraded by crossing approximately the entire atmosphere, so good luck if you're somewhere humid. to add insult to injury, the f35 does things like sink heat with fuel and use nozzles that air-cool the exhaust while it's coming out

[@kksmith244]

Unfortunately, the practical future of air warfare is unmanned. If you lose five UCAVs at twenty million each, and kill even one half billion dollar jet: you've won in terms of cost and crew sustainability.

[@dumdumbinks274]

That future is very far off. Right now a $20 million UCAV isnt even capable of engaging fighters at close range effectively, let alone BVR where a $80 million fighter can absolutely dominate a UCAV. Then you have to consider the effect of electronic warfare on UCAVs, because they rely on networking a lot more than any fighter does.

[@appa609]

I'm not aware of any half-billion-dollar fighter jets. Unless you mean something big like a B-2 or A-380. Besides the main mission for fighter jets today is Ground Strike and SEAD.

[@generalshepherd4573]

Hello! , this was uploading yesterday

[@thegloriousquran1208]

Can't russies make a non circular exhaust

[@freedomvanguard8185]

russkies can't make anything more complicated than a potato-gun

[@hrvojemikulcic7074]

Can 1-2 GHz detect stealth plane in range about 60 km between 2 plane (1 normal and 1 stealth)!?

[@KRGruner]

Yep, "shape, shape, shape..." Eurofighter = LOL!

[@nippon2003]

Stealthy is not only radar absorbation.

[@Teejay82_]

RIP speakers.. also, awesome segway :D

[@maoistking7490]

SECOND........I LIKE UR EVERY VIDIO. I wonder why I fell u are the most, Accurate then the ones' country itself. 💋💌💘💝💖💗💓💞💕💟❣❤🧡💛💚💙💜🤎🖤🤍💯💯💢💥💣💣💣💣

[@elfamily9559]

Do some southeast Asia episodes

[@fi7549]

ASEAN VS CHINA

[@patrickrk44]

S3/400s couldnt detect F35s circling above them in Iran and in Syria, so theres a lot more to American stealth technology then you know

[@kathrynck]

Detection isn't a matter of IF, it's a matter of how far away, and from what angle. Which is why internally, it's called "low observable", not "invisible". It takes good intel and clever flight planning to exploit fully. Pilot situation awareness in the F-35 make it arguably better able to remain hidden than an F-22, despite a larger RCS. People also really underestimate the value of treetop level flight though, the curvature of the earth hides you fairly quickly, without so much as a hill to hide behind. And ground clutter makes things hard on radars as well. Data sharing from a non-stealth stand-off platform, and a closer attack stealth plane, mixed with some jamming and other diversions can be devastatingly effective.

[@patrickrk44]

@rob 998 if MSM you mean russia having its pansir destroyed twice on two separate occasions by F35s and russia pulling it out of service and replacing it by tor, propaganda? Lmao iran also admitted it and fired their general, it was even news inside of iran from their state run media. But hey, the ignorance is on you.

[@patrickrk44]

@@kathrynck no, incorrect. I have the rf profiles and I can tell you the F35 is stealthy from the front, narrow front especially. Other Angles it is decently stealthy, however it flew circles over the systems. Destroyed two pansir systems as well.

[@kathrynck]

@@patrickrk44 Well I ever said it wasn't stealthy from the front. But to a trained eye it's easy to tell that It's at the rear where the stealth is less refined than the F-22 or B-2. And even from the front, the F22/B2 are somewhat better in RCS performance. But if an F-22 or B-22 pegs a couple mosquitoes on take off, then the bug splat makes them much more similar. So the F-35 has a more "pragmatic" stealth. It's not sloppy engineering, it's choices made in which compromise to take. IRST is the emergent "counter stealth" tool of choice. And the F-35 is designed around taking a slightly less extreme emphasis on RF stealth, in order to regain some design benefits in other aspects of it's design. From the rear jet aircraft are especially vulnerable to IRST detection, so the temptation to go with a more efficient but less stealthy engine nozzle was too tempting to pass up. It does have an interesting nozzle though, but I don't think it'd be a good idea to explain in detail, since it goes into ideas which aren't included in this video. But the F-35's RF stealth is very carefully matched to it's IR detection vulnerabilities. Which really simplifies the workload of avoiding detection. The F-35 does have a surprisingly constrained IR signature for a plane making, i think it's up to 46 or 48k lb wet thrust now. It's an amazingly smartly designed plane. I think it's the most deadly plane in the sky (although if they updated the F-22 to a "C" model, it would pull ahead).

[@JesusKnowsAllComeToHim]

Russia vs Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Greenland

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

How to level up in quality like Comisser Binkov?

[@isaaclobo7311]

Nice video bro

[@bestcity0979]

A russian accent frog muppet giving excellent commentary?! Awesome!

[@lancelotgohel8460]

Komrad kermit

[@bestcity0979]

@@lancelotgohel8460 yea

[@bestcity0979]

@Brian Zhang yea same

[@pradeepkumar-qo8lu]

A really well researched video, thanks russian kermit