Shark Vacuum Vs Dyson Why not to Buy Either!

A brief explanation of the marketing success Shark vacuum versus the other biggest marketing success Dyson vacuum both are horrible compared too competitors.
Vacuums Recommend By Professionals
www.amazon.com...
Check out our hashtag #CentralVacuumpropaganda
Help Support us on / performancereviews
Like us on / performancereviews

[@281cu6]

There's two types of opinions on Sharks I generally see. 1. People who have owned Sharks and are aware of how bad they are. 2. People who currently own Sharks and are defensive of their shortcomings (common when you spend money on something). Dyson's owners are usually just people who don't know anything about vacuums and think they are the vacuum equivalent of Apple. Both vacuum brands are just exercises in marketing rather an exercises in actual lasting functionality. They both generally clean well on the first bin (which is like one room lol), then needs a filter wash or starts cleaning like crap.

[@eaustin2006]

There's a 3rd kind. Someone who owns one now and realizes fully what a piece of crap it is. That would be me.

[@asiffarooqui6789]

It's like you're complaining about everything bud.

[@PerformanceReviews]

#centalvacuumpropaganda

[@2711marcus]

The latest Sharks with the duo clean heads the brushroll just pops out and you can get replacement brushrolls from Shark for £10 in the UK. For around £200 they are not bad value. You don't have to pay for postage here under the warranty. Not saying I'm a shark fan but they are not as bad as made out to be here 😁

[@DabblelyDiddly]

had my hv380 for 6 months. have a few other machines so it doesnt see constant use. its already sounding like the motor bearings are dryed out and tearing themselves apart.

[@mehmanuel]

*one of the brushrolls pop out. The soft-roller pops out, the other brushroll is designed to not be easily removanle.

[@WeSRT4]

Another happy Shark owner here. First off it does have a cyclone and it works. Your filter cleanings depend on how much fine particles you vacuum up. In my situation a filter cleaning every month or even two works just fine.

[@0013Evan]

Gilitar he doesn’t sell them, so there no good. He thinks you should go out and give 1000 or more dollars for a vacuum that honestly does nothing better than this.

[@kristinebuell67]

@@0013Evan Exactly. I had a pricey $1000+ vacuum that the motor quickly became plugged up with fine dust due to our rural setting along a dirt road. This issue is not a covered warranty issue. Spent $300 in repairs and within months it again was plugged up. Insufficient pre-motor filteration. I have a Shark that has been going strong for five years and it cost me $350. Which is the better deal for most people, lol?

[@reeennneee]

You can go on simplicity's website and can buy a freedom for $399 I have a commercial version that runs better then orecks Dyson sharks etc

[@purplerain3457]

Honestly hoover is a bigger shitshow than shark in Britain

[@madabouthoovers9767]

Both are made in China, and CHEAPLY made in China. Chinese made goods on the whole are designed to last a short period of time before they break down, and you have to throw them away and buy new ones. The Chinese are taking us all for mugs, and they can do, as we are now dependent on them for just about everything, because UK businesses made our people redundant and moved all production to China, so they could make more profit, and in this day and age, profit for the big bosses and directors is what matters most. screw the consumer basically.

[@LlyleHunter]

I don't think so. I don't have any bagless machines but I think that the React and Direct Drive Pet are made better and have better warranties than anything from Shark.

[@LlyleHunter]

They're better cleaners too.

[@Robbo1966]

@@madabouthoovers9767 Well said, ive been thinking this for ages.

[@maximaniac7231]

I bought a Shark handheld vacuum to do my stairs as I didn't want to mess with the Kirby on them. I love the Kirby as everything on it is replaceable. Naturally I checked to see how to change the belt on the Shark. What's this? You can't!!! Nope. Took it back to Wal-Hell and got a refund. Then I thought I got smart and bought a Eureka 71B in no small part because of the stellar Amazon reviews. It did have a replaceable belt. About a year after I bought it the switch broke. The belt was still good though! Now I just use the portable handle on the Kirby to do the stairs. It's a good workout but I like knowing it's doing a great job cleaning and nothing ever breaks on it.

[@user-yi8hs3tx5g]

He makes everything so difficult

[@PerformanceReviews]

Not really 😁 kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2O5Z2mbnd6Jrck

[@ronaldomurilloespinoza1308]

Atleast Shark gives us infomercial videos to edit😂😂!!

[@jimtomassetti4817]

Great that you take the time to Explain the dose & dont's of this vac. Nice looking machine but know's to the customer part. Keep up the great work! Thank You!!!

[@fracturedmind8124]

If I had to choose between a Shark and Dyson, I’d probably pick the Dyson. At least with Dyson you can somewhat find parts.

[@goodgremlinmedia2757]

Eh. They just cut out small repair shops and don’t sell OEM parts to them anymore

[@shawnamison2485]

What I find interesting is that shark, and other budget brands sell their vacuums with a lot of high end features for little cost. I can get a shark with an electric handheld brush roller for stairs, and get a bunch of accessories and attachments for less than $200. But comparing this to a real canister vac, or the closer comparison the sebo felix, you're looking at spending triple that amount. Obviously the sebo will last forever and the shark will die in a few years most likely, but for a budget vac with a lot of features, I can see the appeal that these have to a lot of people. And yes I did see your shark vs felix vid and I agree with all your points :) just wish I could buy a sebo for less than $300, but you get what you pay for, if the wife let's me spend that much that is!

[@PerformanceReviews]

If you look at the SEBO Dart might be more in your price range at $450 Also SEBO K series canisters are discontinued and sometimes you can find a deal on those

[@saveurital455]

@@PerformanceReviews Ok, so you think SEBO is the thing. Shark is expensive in EU. I'll check on the brand. Thanks

[@zacharysnyder5325]

@@saveurital455 Hello there. Hope you got a Sebo I had gotten one as well and will never study back to these types of vaccuums the Sebo is my new favorite

[@saveurital455]

@@zacharysnyder5325 Thanks, I also bought Sebo Felix with motor head. The best vacuum cleaner I've ever had! I used to hate vacuum cleaning for years but I now enjoy it everyday. extremely light to maneuver.

[@dremid4456]

I gave this vid a like because your demonstrations & attention to detail are great. One criticism is that I find the title to be a false equivalence; while the Dyson has its flaws/shortcomings, it is still lightyears ahead of the junk made by Shark. Like, for example, it can actually be used conveniently as a canister, and has a million knockoff hose extensions/cleaning heads/etc. available. And re: your comment on people choosing uprights vs. canisters, due to laws of physics (fluid mechanics), uprights offer more powerful suction (the motor is adjacent to cleaning head's point of contact w/ surface); not to mention, IMO the weight of upright vacuums actually make them easier to use in the sense that you don't have to push down to achieve greater suction. I'm a bit OCD and always find my wrist getting sore when trying to the head of a canister vac down into carpet... Anyhow, it seems to me that the only downsides to that Dyson are its leaky HEPA filter, and the price. Re: price, keep in mind that Dyson comes from the UK, and in the UK/EU the price of the two machines is the same (Dyson quite a bit cheaper here). I don't use Dyson uprights or canisters anymore (I do like their cordless V8 for odd jobs tho), so I'm not a huge fanboy. But I just think it's a bit ridic to portend that a Dyson purchase would be equally regrettable.

[@jackie-minjiewu5483]

Thank you for an explanation of canister vs upright, esp on carpet. I’ve used uprights my whole life and just *looking* at a canister made me skeptical when it comes to performance compared to an upright, but I couldn’t explain why mechanically. I just felt that the power head on canister vacuums looked daintier in comparison and felt “disconnected” but of course if I walked into a vacuum store, no one would know what I was talking about and would continue to sing the praises of a canister’s superior suction power. Plus some people have complained they don’t like the canister following them around, tipping over, bumping into things, and being too unwieldy, which I rarely see mentioned on this channel. But thanks, you explained something which should be obvious from a physical point of view. That being said, what vacuum or vacuums would you recommend for combination of stairs, hardwood, and wall to wall carpet? Thank you.

[@SethJ57]

Thanks for the information. Something always told me That cyclone design on the Shark was a flop. Really, Shark? Almost no parts available? What a joke! I had to use a Shark when helping someone move one time, and let me tell you, that thing was a hunk of junk. It barely performed on bare floors even with the roller brush engaged; edge cleaning was a nightmare,having to hold the unit while using the wand; having to reach into the bin to clear debris away from the intake to keep it from losing power was a royal pain; oh, and the motor sounded like it was dying. I wished I brought my Kirby. do yourself a favor and save For a Sebo Felix or Sebo Dart instead of buying a Shark. If you can’t afford that, get yourself a used Kirby and have it tuned up. It’ll serve you well for years to come. I’ve got a Kirby G3 that’s been fixed up and is going strong at 30 years old.

[@stevenswall]

Valid critique: vacuum stores can't really stock parts and shark doesn't want to give them out.

[@arek2224]

After watching you review I went to the store and purchased dyson... VERY DISAPPOINTED... heavy, hard to push, can not get in to small areas... sorry dyson, going back to the store. Had 3 Sharks for last 15 years, never had to order parts nor call customer service... Shark rocks !!!

[@PerformanceReviews]

Obviously you didn't watch my video because I recommend not buying either . Europro hads not not even been labeling there Vacuums shark for 5 years . So what really happened?

[@PerformanceReviews]

Apparently you didn't understand the point of the video. Which was not to buy either and look to something higher quality.

[@reeennneee]

You could have bought a simplicity freedom $399 less then a Dyson and or shark I have one best vacuum ever bought and it's well worth the money

[@marcs57]

You're right Alex, My son had one of these for less than a year when the motor blew smoke and died. Pure JUNK. And yes, he kept the filters clean.

[@Reeeeeeeeeeeeemis]

I own this exact model Shark. Even have the same green/emerald color. I agree 10000000000% with what you're saying. I hate how the filter gets dirty after one pass of vacuuming. I will also add that the bristles are extremely stiff on this model and appeared to grinding my old carpet. When I got new high pile carpet, this seemed to just have too much resistance and that's when I got a hoover which doesn't have these issues.

[@BennParkii690]

In the UK I can’t fault the service and aftercare from Shark. The brushroll stopped working and they sent a new one out the next day. The bin went cloudy, again, sent out the next day. Then.....the motor burnt out after 2 years and they sent me a prepaid label, arranged collection of the machine and they sent me out a BRAND NEW Shark tools and all 👌 as far as warranty is concerned, they’re as good as Dyson I have found, absolutely faultless. I don’t own the Shark any more, but it lives round the corner with 3 years left of its warranty. I agree with a lot of other statements and observations of yours though 😉 that’s why I got rid lol

[@nickchapman1884]

Theres a reason that businesses use Numatic Cylinder vacuums. 20 year old henry no loss of suction. Can still lift itself, pet brush only needs cigarette lighter to untangle hair. 5 year guarantee, can be run bagless, huge capacity. As a service engineer i used to repair old hoover and even recondition them, electrolux i used to get paid to replace belts and melted cowels or write them off, bissell only ever sold agitator brushes, numatic I never ever had to repair apart from carbon brush change on a commercial variant, kirby were just overpriced over powered crap that blew fuses and damaged carpet fibres. Numatic used to test motors by running them blocked for 20 minutes.. No distortion or overheating.. The design isn't for everyone but they work and easy to store

[@brycejames7626]

So what brand/model wold you recommend?

[@Blackout720]

They're popular only because the bag capacity is huge..

[@KellyK387]

That’s the shark I have it’s junk I’ve had 2 replacements this year alone from shark under warranty “pods” went out dyson I have is an up13 yes and that paying to ship to shark is bogus what good is a warranty if I have to pay to ship ?

[@DANNYN224]

What brands of vacuums can I find parts for

[@DashDrones]

The Dyson and shark cost exactly the same in the UK & Ireland

[@PerformanceReviews]

But you could buy a Miele or an AEG over there for less money than here

[@DashDrones]

Yep, bought a Miele C3 Cat & Dog - Unbelievable suction. Can't believe I trusted Dyson for so long

[@vacuumtests9225]

Finally a Shark video! Just some of my opinions about my NV500 and NV340 models: - cyclone system is bad (proven in my video) - filters need washing twice a month when used regularly - they deepclean a lot better than the Dyson DC40 (proven in several of my videos) - carpet cleaning performance overall is good - better airflow than in the Dyson DC40 - tiny screamer motors with extremely high rpm - brushroll motor is very noisy - useless in the canister caddy - top heavy (tips over when using the hose) - feels quite cheaply made After I got the Sebo Felix I haven't used Sharks almost at all...

[@madabouthoovers9767]

Lol - finally, Mr Snickars has seen the light!

[@vacuumtests9225]

MadAboutHoovers Thanks to the quality German vacuums 😁

[@2711marcus]

MadAboutHoovers Mr Snickers?

[@vacuumtests9225]

Mark Pritchard Snickars is my last name 😄

[@madabouthoovers9767]

Yep, Mikko Snickars is easier to type than Mr Vacuumtests.

[@markushay3578]

Outstanding review. After reading several sites and going back and forth between the Shark (NV752) and the Dyson Animal 2, this video convinced me that the Shark is the way to go. Seems more versatile and the only thing it really lags behind on is suction power -- but not by enough to justify the price difference, especially since Amazon has it for $291 at the moment (27% discount).

[@PerformanceReviews]

Youb should watch the video. My advice is to buy something completely different.

[@mikemigliorino130]

They don't seem like they are user friendly machines at all! I have an old Hoover Futura canister from 1993 that I had originally bought! Best machine ever!! I just had to replace the hose once, but other than that. I never had any other issues! The original Hoover's were awesome machines!!

[@chahahc]

lol @ all the downvotes, people actually trying to defend this engineering disaster. But the fact that it looks like a transformers robot indicates the exact market this thing is geared towards.

[@YoumuHoover]

If Satan had a vacuum. He will used a shark.

[@LlyleHunter]

That's perfect!

[@garys9718]

It's so hard to empty the bin out,, so they're just so many people who love the shark too

[@G56AG]

I don't know much about Shark, but Dyson's deceptive advertising bugs the heck out of me. EG they talk about their exclusive electric motor designs, but take one apart and you find an off the shelf Panasonic part used in many different vacuums. Or their "bladeless" fan, that has a blade, you just can't see it. The gimmicky space cadet styling is ridiculous. Pure sleaze.

[@sunrisejess3172]

own this vacuum. Can echo everything you're saying. They also have a hard floor attachment for this that's basically pointless. It's literally constantly coated in fine dust. The brush roll is a PITA if you have pets. Saving up for a Sebo/Henry/Miele/something better. I won't ever buy another Shark. Feel overwhelmed with the options. The Sebo's premium hard floor tool looks really good. I have a Chesapeake Bay Retriever/Pit Bull mix, two kids and very little carpet (pulling it up soon), mostly hard floor and rugs. Would love to hear your recommendation. I want something with accessible parts I can easily order.

[@Javi_Lacking]

Honestly, I fell for the hype multiple times over. I have several Shark machines in my collection, but I'm scared to seriously use them because of shit parts availability - even though I'm gentle with them, they'll probably crap out on their own soon enough. That's why I'm partial to stuff like Panasonic, Sanitaire, Hoover, and old Dirt Devil: easy to find parts, fairly easy to service, and they work a lot better for the money.

[@whelenvortexr4]

I almost bought that Shark back in 2015. I had a Bissell Momentum at the time, which is still running my dad and step mom have it now. I replaced it with a Sanitaire Tradition Sc688 and bought a Miele S7 instead of this Shark.

[@Ca31_Buff]

I love shark. Sorry, but I am seeing what you mean. They do pick up very well. My holds around a gallon or 2 of dirt and I could fill it in a week, but my bissell powerforce picks up even more

[@PerformanceReviews]

Have you ever tried a real Vacuum?

[@Ca31_Buff]

Performance Reviews 2 Kirby’s a long time ago, 2 dysons and that’s really about it. And a sanitaire sc785. Idk what you would call real vacuums. Vacuums are vacuums.

[@delacruztaylor]

Have to agree, I'm a fan of shark, they also are very easy to take apart and clean when needed. Are they going to last 20 years...........NO, but what the heck does nowadays? I've had a couple of shark's, and they pick up ALOT of dirt & hair, 1 Corgi and 4 cats.

[@smh2659]

@@PerformanceReviews have you ever tried to oh i don't know stop trashing all the time on good vacuum brands?

[@arcfa2267]

you just read my mind! I hate shark vacuums. They even don't have a height adjustment on the power head which I think makes them clean badly. I have a fakir vacuum and it has the same filtration system and it smells even I clean the filters every couple uses.

[@saveurital455]

So what is the best brand for vacuum cleaner? Is there anything you can recommend?

[@PerformanceReviews]

Check out my vacuum review playlist. But generally I recommend the German Brands SEBO and Miele as shown in the description.

[@saveurital455]

@@PerformanceReviews Thanks! Miele is a big disappointment though. I've bought it twice and the quality is bad function is bad. I'm using it only for American pet hair brush with a hose to attach to Miele now. Getting into the millennia, Quality of Miele, Hoover(had a good quality when made in USA, used it in 70s and 80s), Kärcher, Bosch vacs went severely down! I live in Europe so it's much cheaper to buy European products, but I started to avoid German brands that aren't made in Germany anymore. I didn't know SEBO and I'll look into that brand. It seems Made in Germany.Thanks again.

[@W1NDOWS7myIDEA]

I don’t understand what to get out of this video. Comparing the $200 NV680 Shark to a machine over twice the cost but certainly not twice the performance. Not sure what the issue was for other commenters but when calling customer service for both of my original Navigators, I ran into zero issues and received replacement parts whenever needed.

[@PerformanceReviews]

Well the issue is that they're not part of the vacuum dealer trade Association which is not a union. They refused to wholesale parts to dealers. They refused to sell common parts that you would change on a vacuum. Also if you take a look at my channel from my perspective is a repair Tech I'm used to find German vacuums as the benchmark. However Dyson and shark can be found in the same price bracket since they are both heavily discounted so often.

[@BOOSTEDLASER]

Whats a good light weight stick type for my 80 year old mother? Pref something Costco or BJs has

[@PerformanceReviews]

You might consider a robotic vacuum but you would want to set it up for her. Stick vacs are usually so so quality but right now I believe Hoover makes the best one for your money.

[@LuxAudio389]

I agree with you. Either buy a quality vac that's in your budget, or if not, yeah buy a good hoover that can return your investment in convienence and warranty backing. The over marketed Dyson and Sharks are just that.

[@dominicscuriosity]

Yes yes and yes but I like dyson vacuums not sharks

[@ouis-xv3vp]

The Hoover react might out perform the shark powered lift away vacuum on carpet cleaning and filtration

[@kiwibeast2162]

The Shark sounds like the Self Emptying bin for the Ecovacs T8,T8+.and AIVI

[@TheVacuumWizard]

When’s your next stream

[@vacuumsandcarcleanersboy3542]

And I said that’s a Dyson big bowl kinetics so no wonder the motor is bigger the cleaning path is bigger and the desktop is bigger if you can paired it is in DC 41 and a nice and big ball they are big differences

[@RobertBeedle]

Title was supposed to be about shark vs Dyson. Didn’t see much Dyson in here

[@PerformanceReviews]

There's plenty of Dyson in this video along with plenty of other vacuum cleaners you should buy before Dyson

[@retrogamer149]

We got a shark rotator. If can't even do high pile carpet. I'm now looking at purchase a sebo essential g1 upright. I've heard they are good for pet hair but what about high pile shag carpet?

[@PerformanceReviews]

See previous response.

[@retrogamer149]

What about the sebo k series? The specs are almost the same as the e series canister but there's a $100 price difference on Amazon? I also noticed it has the same power head as the felix. Would this be a good choice over the essential g and is it worth the extra money? I never understood why canister vacuums were more expensive.

[@retrogamer149]

My only gripe about the sebo canister vacuums is they have small bags when compared to the sebo uprights.

[@kg5vacuums205]

Yup my dad said they look like toys at Walmart lol, he has a Kirby so do I and I got Sanitaires to and I filter queen so there is no place for a shark here.

[@psabt10081]

Wow, I couldn't help but laugh through this whole video.

[@electroluxlad]

I remember the first time I ever worked on one I fried the circuit board 😂

[@AwesomeVacuums]

Lol, how did you do that.

[@smilertoo]

The Miele cat&dog vacuum is great but the turbobrush is expensive crap, im getting through 2 a year because they seize up...maybe Miele shouldn't claim cat&dog but gerbil instead.

[@PerformanceReviews]

This Video might help kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYSmYpaimM6Ka68

[@sarahheaton7358]

Kirby is garbage now, why are you comparing an older vacuum to newer? Get a new kirby they are a pain, they are junk and they dont back their product.

[@PerformanceReviews]

Never recommended a Kirby .

[@teresamcdowell4431]

You remark about Shark not giving a new vacuum when you send yours back in to be repaired is incorrect I've sent 2 back for repairs and each time I received 2 brand new vacuums from them along with parts and attachments when I've needed those replaced also. Never have they sent me a refurbished anything. Yes I had to pay to have it shipped to them but not shipped back to me they paid that part..

[@charliehins1997]

T M thank you for telling me you sent two back.?

[@2711marcus]

I'm not a fan of shark but the CRI have given it a silver award. Whether CRI can be trusted I don't know. I think the cleaning performance of the Shark and Dyson are very similar.

[@2711marcus]

I do much prefer bagged cleaners. I won't be buying another bagless unless I can find a used water filtration vac at a good price. My next vac will probably be the lux international intelligence which is the same as the Aerus Lux Platinum.

[@BennParkii690]

I think that the Dyson’s with the improved brush roll actually perform better and have much better agitation than the Shark.

[@thetechgenie7374]

They are known to get paid off. Plus more to a vacuum then performance. The main issue with Shark vacuums is lack of serviceable parts. The brush roller, which will wear out after a few month to a year. Then the no rubber bumper on head, as most higher quality vacuums have. So plastics on front bumper crack and wear out over time from getting bumped. Then the plastic small wheels which wear out and no replacements. This is just touching the surface. If they made replacement parts, then won’t be such a big deal. Instead Shark rather just replace the whole vacuum under warranty and then you have to pay to ship it both ways. Just more crap that ends up in the landfills unnecessarily, when they could make it much more serviceable.

[@Filome333]

Can you please suggest some good vacuums with washable life time Hepa filter and bagless what are good filtering mold spores? Can be even older type as I am going to buy some used one and do not have so much money for expensive new vaccums or constant buying new bags and filters. Thanks!

[@PerformanceReviews]

Links in the description. Plenty of videos on my main channel on that subject 😁

[@blackice7408]

What about the new apex zero m

[@PerformanceReviews]

Trash like all Shark vacuums

[@MrDannyisr]

Dang so negative. Seems so biased, is this a commercial for Miele ?

[@PerformanceReviews]

There's really nothing good to say about those machines. Check out the rest of the channel there are many brands I recommend.

[@MrDannyisr]

@@PerformanceReviews right nothing ...

[@thetechgenie7374]

No surprise as Shark is produced by the same company that makes Ninja blenders. Which are total garbage as well, all based on market hype as well. Where a Vitamix actually is made to last and does a much better job.

[@MMMHUMMEL]

The Tech Genie Actually my Ninja is 2011 still running, I haven't even replaced any blades and I use it alot. My Vitamix died last year, used it moderately, and it's a 2015.

[@wabashstudio]

I love the ninja blender. I have one for about 7 years now and it works amazing. Best blender I have ever had. Also Shark is OWNED by the same company but is produced by a different company.

[@steeltag]

a vitamix dying is a freak thing...not even close to normal. I've had mine since 1998....zero problems.

[@jermdawg2805]

@@steeltag same here. Went cheap and bought a ninja and hated it. Hard to clean and cut my fingers on the blade.

[@spaghetti9067]

When you get into a conversation in a vacuum video about blenders

[@Theaustincollier]

Shark is such garbage the over-marketing is comical. Fell for the hype in 2014 brushroll went out in 6 months even though i cleaned it after every use. Got a Dyson Ball and never looked back, 3 years of near daily usage and never a day of trouble.

[@parwaz7861]

Nice! 👌 I agree, we have a DC41 mk2 as our main vacuum, gets used twice a day, every day and had no problems so far

[@Theaustincollier]

Parwaz 786 Awesome! Yeah imo Dyson is one of the most reliable cleaners out there as long as the maintenance is done as recommended. In a home with 2 pets never an issue same goes for my V6 and DC44.

[@justinhu8]

And when maintenance isn't done. It all goes to shit ;)

[@eaustin2006]

But the guy at the Vacuum Wars site loves these. Then again, Shark shill doesn't begin to describe this guy. I think Shark has a truck that goes around to his house every week and drops off money.

[@Kubulek17]

The newer dysons are overpriced and shit. I’ve got a dc01 from 1997 and a dc15 from 2005 running daily with no issues.

[@tcaseyfba4518]

Hoover is better then Shark, Hoover has a powered reach that i own which more powerful and it has a better cyclonic system..

[@leslieslass]

Why did you buy the Shark if you don't like it . I guess it was to whinge & moan about it.

[@PerformanceReviews]

Luckily I didn't buy either of these vacuums they just came in for service. Definitely check out some of the other reviews

[@leslieslass]

I have the Shark, & I personally love mine.

[@madabouthoovers9767]

Come back and see us again when your powerhead hose splits and you cant get a replacement without shelling out 70 quid for a complete new powerhead. Most people think Sharks are wonderful when they first get them, but for many, the wonder soon turns to despair when the machine starts falling apart. I suggest you read down this page, and see how many unsatisfied Shark customers there are compared to those who think they are wonderful facebook.com/pg/SharkCleaning/community/?ref=page_internal

[@saltan44]

Miele vacuum tha best

[@bettypowell5925]

What would you suggest I clean houses I need a good upright with a hose and the lift away is nice for underneath furniture mostly because a tool or hose will not properly pick up all debre from under furniture .

[@bettypowell5925]

I forgot to add that I also need something light weight to tote up and down stairs.

[@PerformanceReviews]

Take a look at SEBO/Windsor, pro team and Hoover hushtone+ Vacuums

[@matthewbroom3176]

I am so glad I watch this video you helped me decide to not get a shark vacuumI was planning on getting the bigger version of that but I'm getting different vacuum

[@spaghetti9067]

I’d take the dyson in a heartbeat over the shark Then again I’d take a sebo/Miele brilliant in a heartbeat over the dyson

[@jacobbates3652]

It’s an even worse Sanyo transformax

[@maxgomez8907]

I use to have a dyson

[@PerformanceReviews]

That's nice are you glad you got rid of it?

[@profosyoneloyuncu8161]

If İ buy a dyson Im buy a canister one

[@peterbritnell7579]

Shark is another name for a dodgy dealer, how ironical!

[@lanetterhode3591]

best

[@anasevi9456]

lol, look at all the sunk cost salt!

[@wifesnatcher_donald1x724]

Kirby is the way to go

[@PerformanceReviews]

Kirby is definitely not the way to go for anybody without autism.

[@whelenvortexr4]

@@PerformanceReviews I have aspergers and still don't know how to take apart or detach a Kirby😂

[@ad356]

@@PerformanceReviews but a $50 craigslist kirby is still heads and shoulders better then a brand new shark lol

[@AmericansAlwaysFree]

@@whelenvortexr4 it's rather simple

[@whelenvortexr4]

@@AmericansAlwaysFree I grew up using them and I find it inconvenient to change attachments. They're good vacuums, I just like my machines with the onboard tools. I love my Miele

[@MrBikboi]

Real tawwk pimp. If you're buying a shark or a dyson with all the fantastic machines out there and information at your fingertips you're mush brain.

[@kasjun1]

Let's be a little negative there fella....

[@blakaeg]

SEBO everytime. You are only telling the truth.

[@stevenswall]

I think vacuum wars did a test with a sebo. I don't think it did anything the best.

[@papadop]

If I had to choose between a Dyson and a Shark, I'd definitely go with a Miele.

[@WeSRT4]

If Dyson had some of Shark's features you guys would all be out of business. The Dyson cyclones work and if it was combined with DuoClean and the Shark features it would be game over.

[@PerformanceReviews]

You fail to understand vacuum cleaners. 😂🤣

[@WeSRT4]

Performance Reviews No I understand that you are heavily biased and grasping for straws when you disparage Dyson and Shark.

[@PerformanceReviews]

Okay thenname a "feature" that shark has the Dyson doesn't have? Dyson sells canister vacuums therefore that eliminates the reason for a lift away.

[@WeSRT4]

Performance Reviews DuoClean, lift away, LED lights. No having a separate canister vac doesn’t replace lift away. You would need two Dyson vacs to accomplish that.

[@RyanSellman1]

Not really, because vacuums do break, and you'll need someone to fix them.

[@kimberlybrookes5844]

What bizarre bagged vacuum cult which hates bagless vacuums have I stumbled upon lmao... Is this like... the last Remnants of the door to door vacuum sales men culture

[@PerformanceReviews]

No door to door salesman just honesty. Most vacuums produced are still bagged. You won't see a single commercial person using a bagless vacuum. What bizarre bagless cult member have I stumbled upon? 😂🤣

[@kimberlybrookes5844]

Performance Reviews - I don’t know a single person who has a bagged vacuum? Bags are expensive.

[@mhtube01]

@@kimberlybrookes5844 Bags are expensive? You can buy a 10 pack of bags for less than $20 for many machines. You call that expensive? Not to mention, for how many times you'd empty a bagless vacuum, you could put a bagged vacuum away. A 10 pack of bags will last most people at least 2 years vacuuming a decent sized house regularly. If you own a bagged vacuum that takes filters too, they come included in the pack of bags and you replace it when you start a fresh new pack of bags. Sounds like a bargain to me. Like he said, why do you think every commercial setting uses a bagged vacuum? Because it's a known fact that they are superior. If you want to keep spending hundreds of dollars on new, throw away bagless vacs every few years and then thousands on new carpet because they don't last long, be my guest.

[@kimberlybrookes5844]

mhtube01 - is there a particular reason you are so upset lmao?

[@mhtube01]

@@kimberlybrookes5844 Upset? More like stumped. I've just heard the "bags are expensive" excuse several times and think it's so stupid. People will spend $600 on a Dyson because of the name when they can get a better used machine for less than half the price, bags and belts included. All it takes is a little bit of research. Or if you want a new vacuum, you can buy one that's priced about the same, less, or maybe a little more but you'll spend far less on service over time and it will perform better. That's all I'm saying. But people buy into hype and don't think.

[@danielknott189]

i dont likemkirbys

[@blackice7408]

Try not to cuss brother-man. Sooooo...uumm...v10 cyclone?😁

[@PerformanceReviews]

I'm going to do a video addressing this nonsense glued together joke of a vacuum. I believe in freedom of speech and sometimes I do exercise that with words that might offend people.

[@blackice7408]

Performance Reviews that's fine but if ur religious, you might wanna lay off the cussin'. It's not holy

[@blackice7408]

Performance Reviews which vacuum? The shark, or the v10

[@PerformanceReviews]

I'm definitely not religious. if you are and that's your business. I wouldn't recommend either of those vacuums currently as always I recommend German vacuums SEBO and Miele

[@blackice7408]

Performance Reviews I never said how it's any of ur business. It was just advice. You either take it or leave it. I caint tell you what to do, but 1 thing I can guarantee you is that you WILL regret ur decision if you don't change it before you die. Just sayin

[@turbo3608]

.For Shark its all about the money .For SEBO its all about the performance

[@AwesomeVacuums]

TURBO 360 that’s right

[@DeLuxeCarwashchannel]

TURBO 360 I prefer sanitaire or Kirby

[@peytonmcpherson2328]

I can’t stand Walmart-Target Vaccums

[@ad356]

why on earth would you buy such utter garbage? poorly designed, poor execution, poor build quality, and no replacement parts. the brush roll design is awful. actually would you buy either one. i think the shark is around $300 and the dyson is $500 or so. IF you insist on new you can buy a riccar/simplicity for about the same money. they perform well, are built well can you even get parts for it 10 years after you bought it. if you are budget minded right now there is a kirby heritage II on craigslist for $20...... that's right $20. so you take it home put a new fan into it, new brush roll, new motor brushes, new bag, and a new belt say $40-$50 total maintenance. now you have a decent vacuum that will last a lifetime for $60-70. even if you have it rebuilt at a vac shop you still are far better off. there is also a heritage I for $45, a Gsix for $50, and a much newer sentria for $130 if people stopped buying this trash it would cease to exist and we would all be better off without it. pure garbage.

[@ad356]

and the sad part is i bet allot of people selling those kirby machines dirt cheap are the same uneducated nit-wits that bought junk shark and dyson machines. i really dont understand why people sell used kirby machines so cheap. they are decent quality. i own 3 and probably paid $150 for all 3 of them. i have had them for years.

[@PerformanceReviews]

See my video on the Kirby G6 review, that's why they're so cheap! I definitely agree buying disposable makes no sense. But hey that's what the kids want. Disposable $600 phones and Tide pods.

[@ad356]

@@PerformanceReviews i also have a riccar vibrance while its not a bad machine and lasted us 10 years it certainly has had more problems then the kirby and cost more. its heads and tails above cheap throw away crap. i wont argue that a kirby is a large, heavy, cumbersome, and somewhat inconvenient machine, but they are well built and do a pretty good job cleaning. im sure there are modern machines that are better cleaners, but not mass market junk. you cant say that a kirby is a bad cleaner. do NOT buy any vacuum at a discount china junk place...... target, walmart or similar. i still have my childhood kirby heritage bought when i was in high school. i am 37 years old now. my parents bought it USED back then. it still works despite decades of hard, hard use. survived many dogs and cats. my mom gave it to me because she didnt want to push it. buying used, a kirby makes perfect sense if you are willing to put up with its quirks, a good machine with quirks. buying one new makes absolutely no sense, an absolute rip-off at the price. they need modernize their product and drop the door to door saleman gimmick. they need to be sold at vacuum cleaner centers and at the $1,000-$1,200 price point.

[@PerformanceReviews]

You can buy a new Miele for the price of a good used Kirby. Miele🇩🇪 is superior to Kirby 🇺🇲 And Riccar🇺🇲🇨🇳. Most people will not even consider a used vacuum.

[@ad356]

@@PerformanceReviews i bought a very lightly use kirby tradition for $40 and a Gsix for $50. both were in good working order. many years later all i put into the tradition, a belt and brush roll. im sure the miele is a nice machine, but its $600 and we have $500 per month in child care and $740 in mortgage with all of the other bills. life sucks but a paid for vacuum of decent build quality does make sense. at least its not cheap piece of crap dyson or shark. $40 and $50 kirby in working order is a steal. $600 is still allot of money. if you were going to buy new do you recommend sebo or miele more or equally?

[@merlina8467]

Just be homeless, no need for a vacuum if you have no home. 200iq

[@peytonmcpherson2328]

My 1996 Rainbow does better then that piece of shit!

[@bluey6096]

HOW DARE YOU!! I LOVE SHARK SO MUCH I DON AGREE WITH YOU :(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@jamesmcnair857]

Shark vacuums r shit