Shocking Results! Stock Motor Turbo 2V Goes 10s and Made How Much Power?

[@JesusSaves86AB]

2V's are a great build choice. Simpler engineering = less parts/cost/time to build. And they're proven reliable in any conservative boost configuration with proper maintenance.

[@wickedvq491]

Bingo

[@christenn32]

That torque number is badass. I would expect that from a pushrod, but not this. Very impressive.

[@WarriorOfEden3033]

I don't understand how people think the 2v isn't worth the time or money the block can handle 1000hp the rods break at 600hp the crank at 700hp. For a cheap motor originally from a family car in the 90s I can't complain

[@themrgodfather77]

@@WarriorOfEden3033 the 2v rods are good for maybe 450 and you’re on borrowed time. Now the Manley rods in the 4v are capable of 600 and pushed to quad digit numbers

[@WarriorOfEden3033]

@@themrgodfather77 you can get manly rods for the 2v & make 1400hp

[@wesleygriffin7857]

This shows how solid of a driver Andrew is. Running 10s with only 420rwhp is impressive for a 2v

[@Texas_Road_Warrior]

We ran 10.90s at 125mph with 350hp NA in a foxbody

[@elliottsimmons25]

@@Texas_Road_Warrior yeah a fox that probably weighs alot less

[@_carnivore_joe1520]

Not to take away from the driver, but Tq is what gets cars moving out of the hole fast. 480 foot pounds of tq is why the car went 10's.

[@JesusSaves86AB]

Actually the SN95/New Edge Mustangs are based on an improved Fox platform they dubbed Fox2 if I recall correctly. So there shouldn't be must less weight in a first gen Fox body.

[@israelmontez1958]

Def ect bro stop with 1st or 2nd gen fox lmaoo yea it’s on the fox platform but so are a lot of old ford cars smh the foxbody mustang is wayy lighter especially the coupe version

[@petet2036]

Honestly shocked. 420 whp, and it goes 10s! That torque is nutty though

[@karlhopkins713]

There have been 10 second 2vs with 360 whp it's all in the suspension. Look at the steeda 18 or 19 gt. It just has a converter, full suspension, full exhaust cai tb and e85. The motor is still not opened.

[@michaelharris748]

@@karlhopkins713 yea these weigh like 3200 theyre 600 lbs lighter than a new gt that is pretty significant some people dont realize how much weight effects this stuff...you would need closer to 500 in a 3800 lbs newer stang which is what most of em have when they go 10s. Steedas is doing low 10z with around 500 due to some weight savings plus the et killing 10r80 it has. I mean killing as in very good not killing as in bad lol. This car could go deeper into the 10s with more suspension peices and some more weight reduction mods. I like this build because it shows people you can go 10s without having 700 whp.

[@karlhopkins713]

@@michaelharris748 With the seats out around 3250 but still these are great cars in every way

[@michaelharris748]

@@karlhopkins713 yea they may be just over 33 stock but its easy to yank 200+ out of em without going too crazy more if you get more serious

[@kleenrite5550]

Is that in the 1/8 mile????

[@wickedvq491]

Its the 480 lb tq that got that thing into the 10s. This shows that the 2v has a lot more potential than people know. And its a stock motor 💪💪

[@ndriverkg104]

Niceee 10 sec at that hp and your stock internals this is pure impressive great job man

[@chrism.728]

420rwhp/480rwtq is impressive for a 2V Mustang that runs 10s in the 1/4 mile.

[@JustKona]

Torque is what got you into the 10"s. Top end of the track your making up with the boost.

[@ntricarico87]

Andrew, you just proven what 2V-Mustang enthusiasts been doing literally for years. These engines are stout with moderate boost and good up keep. I may be getting dicey with this statement but I bet its faster than the 13/14 GT500 in the 1/4th.

[@JesusSaves86AB]

That would be a good one to watch, the newer stangs have a lot of excessive weight which is just one more reason to give the classics more love.

[@madmod]

Now that he has a gt500..

[@midnight347]

It's close actually the trap speed is very similar maybe slightly more it would be a good run with a stock 13 gt500 prob a drivers race this car would have the advantage from a dig obviously.

[@Hellion94]

We had a fox that went 10.97 with only 385 rwhp, and an SN95 that went 9.87 with 535 rwhp. You don't need huge power to go fast, just need a good setup. Love the channel. That Bullitt would be a riot wit a little better top end power.

[@michaelharris748]

Amen...that is exactly right the younger generation is fixated on big dyno numbers and act like if it isnt pushing 700-800 whp it isnt worth a damn but that isnt the case at all. Too many people with big power dyno queens that cant put the power down for shit vs people with more tame setups that can boogie down a track like nobodys business. I love the reactions people act like its unreal to hit 10z with just over 400 whp but people have been doing this for years people are just fixated on big dyno numbers and nothing else these days

[@mr.roush6709]

Little old 2V putting in work!! Great video Andrew

[@andrewd6754]

A light weight car with good suspension, a good driver, and a strong torque curve like that doesn't need a ton of top end.

[@austinbass5503]

Dude I live in Florida about an hour from Gainesville raceway, we go to Daytona all the time in the summer I’d like to see this car in person sometime! I love the new edge mustangs you don’t get to see many Turbo Ford powered new edges around here!

[@Hayabusagsxr1300]

That’s awesome for a little 2V. But for the love of god get that car aligned! The crooked steering wheel is driving me crazy

[@Ali-bz9gd]

Good stuff, investment in a set of drag suspension is important, as you can see your stock sway bar is suffering on that 10.9 linch, and you are all over the place.

[@98snakehorse]

I’m excited... my turbo 2v just made 574 and 560tq this weekend I’m hoping for low 10’s maybe high 9’s

[@P71ScrewHead]

built or stock internals??

[@jeremybode3129]

On stock internals? I have a 2001 bullitt too. What brand turbo? Did you do it yourself?

[@98snakehorse]

Jeremy Bode stock crank, coyote rods and mahle forged pistons

[@carlosvelasco4119]

@@98snakehorse wht generation coyote rods do you have

[@98snakehorse]

@@carlosvelasco4119 they are actually considered the "boss 302 rods" part# CR3Z6200B

[@donaldjohnson4570]

I am running 2004 Mustang Gt 426hp/ 512 tq, full on3 performance 76mm turbo, stock motor, 9lbs boost, PP intake manifold, 60lb injectors, ngk tr6 plugs, pmas maf, returnless fuel rail on 93 octane, msd coil pack, egr delete, pprv delete.

[@GameOver321]

With that fuel I thought it would make 450hp and 500tq. Great driving at 420 and 10's. So cool that's a stock long block. I have a built 2v and torque teck in my 00 and ran 10.50 through a t56...hats off

[@ProxityProductions]

T56 bolts right up?

[@GameOver321]

@@ProxityProductions mine was a viper spec but basically yeah

[@misterbulger]

Most importantly, you need TRACTION to go fast. The turbo gives you very manageable power that doesnt blow all the rubber off. I can barely find grip on my 4.6 NA setup it's got plenty of torque to get you there.

[@jonjonnm]

I'm no professional at all but I definitely feel they need a little bigger of a fan infront of the car 😂👌

[@TonyTheTruckGuy]

Damn, 10’s on only 420/480? Impressive.

[@FamilyCTSV]

Real bang for a buck.

[@rdy2run332]

Yes it is for sure.

[@StreetBikeTakeoverYT]

Well shit.. Basically a 400 hp 10 second car, very impressive for a 2V . I guess it helps they only weigh 3300 lbs

[@s550danny]

YzfR6 420 wheel is about close to 500

[@that_white_f30]

It’s not the HP. It’s the torque. Everyone always sleeps on torque

[@michaelharris748]

Idk why ppl keep sayin its impressive for a 2v. Its at 420 rwhp that is easy to get to on a stock motor 2v with forced induction. Yea 10s at that power to weight ratio is impressive regaurdless what power plant is making the power.

[@Kool-Papa-Rell]

3250

[@ChungusBoi69]

I think its crazy i came across this video. Im in the middle of building a 99 Gt 2 valve with a On 3 turbo kit as well. I also was planning on going to tuners inc just like you did. I live here in daytona too. The car put down some good numbers and for it to run 10s at the track is awesome!

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

Yeah man go see Tony. Tony is awesome

[@ChungusBoi69]

@@MustangLifestyleTV Good to hear man, I’ll definitely be going to Tony to get tuned. I cant wait to get the car going!

[@Zaqaryy]

I also have a 99 2v here in daytona

[@garrettlee959]

I’m actually rebuilding a Bullitt with a 3v on3 turbo kit 76mm. Going for a built block and an 82mm with the t56 now

[@_carnage2v927]

My vortech spiked at 18lbs and few times when it was cold as shit out. Wonder how much power it was making. The engine didnt hold up very well lol.

[@Lethal_Venom]

Good driving Andrew for that kind of a time w/ that power number it threw out

[@everyonewasstealingmynamea919]

And people say the 2v is total ass....

[@michaelharris748]

People only wanna go with what is new and trendy its trendy to diss on 2vs and act like they cant do shit. Truth is for what they can be had for (the engines and the new edge cars themselves) theyre pretty stout. If you wanna make more power all u need is forged rods and pistons which costs under 1500 bucks total for parts and you can really go fast then and make some damn good power. You dont gotta coyote swap to have a mean ride and you dont gotta ls swap either....

[@DailydrivenTransAm]

thts all due to the badass suspension and obvious drivermod

[@michaelharris748]

He has slicks on bigs n littles he doesnt really have that good a suspension you can see that from the launch with some weight savings and better suspension its much deeper into the 10s.

[@DailydrivenTransAm]

@@michaelharris748 he has complete upr everything on that car and viking covers at all 4 corners. tht is def suspension doing work.

[@Menalopolis]

This thing is so fucking impressive man shoutout to the ford engineers that figured this thing out decades ago but everyone just looked past it when it was n/a

[@leehinson]

glad to see that Tony has had his hands on it,that dude is awesome

[@bodyshotjake7475]

Where did boost stop? That torque from the turbo is why many guys say go cenri if you sticking with the stock bottom end.

[@jessyv6205]

would love to get my hands on the tune i have a 03 mustang gt with 75mm intake plenum and a typhoon intake manifold aka metal, 44lb injectors, brisk spark plugs silver, gms coil packs, but only 5lbs of boost im thinking of going 10lbs but theirs only 91 pump gas around my area

[@Spad68]

That's atleast 500/520 hp/torque at the flywheel. Very nice indeed . It'll heart some feeling for sure.

[@turbotommyguns]

Impressed! 420/480 and in the 10's. Damn.

[@WarriorOfEden3033]

9s if it could hook 🤣

[@ozzy0611]

430 is my guess. So stoked for this video!

[@ozzy0611]

Impressed.

[@mihaeltomasovic]

The Bullitt and all the New Edge Mustangs will have the "edge" - pardon the pun - over the new body style because of the weight differences... That's the main reason you have so many notchback foxes getting chopped and used for dragsters - I wish I could find a stock one to just put bolt ons for the 302 with the T5 transmission and have fun with... But they are flying up in price because they are so lightweight and they are just simply fantastic for track use.

[@alexandergrimm1195]

Would I be able to get a list of upgrades you did? I have a 4.6 2v I'm going to have rebuilt after a long lazy life of 289000 miles of grandma ownership

[@supersayinone]

Alexander Grimm that’s impressive almost 300k miles

[@MillennialDad92]

How did you get your inital tune to run the turbo kit without it being on the dyno?

[@ProxityProductions]

Hmmm have fun with my 10 speed Mabe even go full out na build or build something similar to this. Thing with a new edge is I wouldn’t feel bad about goin full race car and takin a bunch of weight out.

[@streetslayers410]

2v torque monster

[@michealshaw2188]

400hp was what I was thinking. I can't wait to put my brothers one turbo kit on his fox 5.0. See what numbers it can push

[@hondarancher4205]

Good video dude. Keep em coming.

[@silverauto5025]

This is exactly what I'm trying to do in my '03 2v

[@dbm0916]

I live in Orange Park and was wondering what it made on Tony’s tune at tuners inc.

[@misplacedgarage]

What’s your on opinion on the ON3 kit? Going to pick one up but have read mixed reviews.

[@TheRed01-01]

I have one on a 3v and not gonna lie you gonna have to buy alot of little parts that add up . Because on3 has some shitty parts. Hoses , clamps , fitting , oil relocation, boost controller, wastegate forsure , and some other little things . But it adds up

[@TheRed01-01]

And prob a ball bearing turbo because the journal ones they send with the kit are crappy and mine after 5 months of moderate use it has shaft play .

[@misplacedgarage]

Cris The Red so I should probably just save up and buy a better kit to start with?

[@yzf400rider]

holy crap only 420whp. my goal is going 10s also in my 2v. I guess im going overkill on my set up with a built motor, built tr3650, tvs 2300 18 psi. planning to push 550-600whp. im excited :D

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

It all depends how committed you are to going straight. This car is definitely committed based on the suspension

[@1armedguy4]

That's not bad for what goodies you have in the old girl. Cheers !

[@timmyrland]

Awesome numbers man

[@vinnydelucia2510]

Where is this tune shop located? I am in ct and willing to have it to trailered there!! My Lord, that is impressive.

[@negativesplits06]

I’m guessing 435 without looking @ the numbers yet.

[@shawnlibby675]

Yep and it's probably a little worse at 1/4 of a tank because of tires on back or up a bit in the nose is pointing down so when you have a 1/4 of tank is probably less so it's going to starter cuz that ass is up a bit

[@kleenrite5550]

0:12 COLD START???? 84°F people wearing short shelves??? Try a cold start in Michigan @ minus 21.

[@JesusSaves86AB]

He just means the engine is at ambient temperature.

[@blueyes84gcms]

Hav the same problem with breaking up on my 2 valve at a 1/4 tank

[@naltwaundarby7414]

Nice shifting

[@jocrp6]

Completely stock engine? didnt open ring gaps? stock pistons? I have a friend wants to turbo his 04 2 valve 4.6l, I told him he cant with out going into bottom end, But if this completely stock engine i will give him green light!

[@brandona4618]

Came back to watch this. V2 shit. Either rebuilding the 4.6 2v in my work truck or building the 5.4 2v and putting it in there instead.

[@lalomarquez5615]

I wonder if by stock motor he means no cams or head work aswell

[@amogoose5638]

He does there is nothing done to the car other than the ones he listed

[@negativesplits06]

Factory sealed I believe.

[@Van1018s]

That thing moves for 415 hp. Nice torque number.

[@dylanmiller8661]

Figured that’s about what it would put down.

[@Thomas63r2]

What is your race weight? With at least 1/2 tank and you in the car. I want to do some math.

[@bengordon7635]

The issue is heat ,,, the 4.6l gets hot very very fast mmmmmmmm .... I have nothing but a 75mm intake .. headers and you run it a little hard gets hot super fast without a turbo .. put a coyote in it used motors under 2k .. 400 hp stock no stress

[@crawdaddan]

The torque does the 10’s

[@jeffreygoss5698]

Hmm I’m surprised that it wasn’t more. But like you said light car good driver.

[@ivypixley7451]

Spun bad on that 10.9 pass

[@VG-913]

ivy pixley if he can get it to bite. He can probably do 10.7 maybe 10.6

[@WestsideWoo]

Are you going to upgrade to a better more efficient turbo by On3?

[@shoua50]

Just watched video and I see there are a lot of 1320 guys watching. Put a Lentech auto in it and it should go mid 10's. I've gone 10.42 at 132 mph at 3500 lbs and 435 to the wheels and 9.50 at 140 mph with 575 hp. In case you're wondering 1320 guys are the ones who think you need 1000 hp to go 10's

[@kenshinhimura9387]

auto is for people who can't drive

[@DesertRatRacer]

Should be around 428hp if you do the math at 12 psi. Not counting better engine efficiency or drive train loss... let them even each other out.

[@joshc606]

Running out of steam after 4500-5000rpm in typical 2V fashion haha. Good numbers though.

[@michaelharris748]

Yea it has alot to do with the turbo too its got loads of torque and way less hp because its a smallish not very efficient turbo but it works enough to get into the 10s obviously. Much less weight than newer mustangs helps. I love how it shows you can go 10s without having a million hp everyone is so fixated on big dyno numbers these days they act like 400 aint nothing but in the right car on the right setup it can do pretty damn good.

[@Bacongrease00]

Why wouldn’t you monitor fuel pressure

[@redform89]

How many miles on the longblock?

[@zydrunassavickas1]

what did you put a mustang ecoboost turbo on that thing? get a real turbo

[@cainadkins3985]

Richard holder would be proud

[@blackoutspecv3743]

Man....wish I still had my 01’ bullitt 😢

[@jeremybode3129]

Want to buy one? I have clean as hell with low miles and not touched yet

[@blackoutspecv3743]

Jeremy Bode what you asking?

[@Krash179]

How well does the stock crank shaft hold up I’ve heard the 4.6 2v ones were junky

[@sategllib2191]

Good for 500-600 whp

[@Contreras-z4e]

I need that for my 98 f150 4.6

[@68fairlane351c]

How is it running?

[@boostghost]

I thought it was going to be closer to 500, surprised you ran those times with such little power.

[@karlhopkins713]

There have been heads cams cars making 360 that have done 10.8

[@michaelharris748]

@@karlhopkins713 exactly...its called traction and power to weight ratio...plus im sure the da was really good

[@everyonewasstealingmynamea919]

boostghost Yeah it’s not a dodge that weighs in 4300 plus driver lol

[@ProxityProductions]

@@karlhopkins713 heads cam n/a cars?

[@travisbristol807]

Weight to Horsepower Ratio Guys.

[@petermaloney8623]

Where is that dash from?

[@TheRed01-01]

My 3v has a on3 turbo on e85 with big pumps on 10 psi . Dont know numbers for mine but i should be way higher hp numbers then yours hopefully lol. What psi you at andrew ?

[@karlhopkins713]

If your engine is stock good luck they blow after 450whp

[@636Berto]

good shit i love it simple setup and get down

[@grantttrevino6310]

Did you ever figure out what was causing it to break up?

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

low fuel resolution was shown in the video

[@grantttrevino6310]

@@MustangLifestyleTV thanks, missed it the 1st time I watched.

[@jacobdominguez5219]

I was gonna make my guess but everyone spoiled it down here , damn it

[@dhatbmxgoon]

0:12 Jah cure call on me intro

[@b00stedrust]

That trap seems HIGH for 418whp..... Sorry my friend, I bet either its hurt now after that run or that dyno reading LOWWWWWWW. for comparison.... my friends EG hatch with 407whp ( on a dynapak...notoriously low reading dynos)... something that weighed 2150 with him in it....went 126-127mph every pass.. on a big slick and correct suspension setup with a quaif differential..track bars...etc etc....How much does that weigh? and u were loose in second... something is up.

[@LsxSosa]

That’s good for a stock 2v block

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

It’s definitely not hurt. Made another pass after and went 11.0 @ 125 mph. My tuner, Tony, said that is exactly what he expected for hp based on the changes.

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

It’s definitely not hurt. Made another pass after and went 11.0 @ 125 mph. My tuner, Tony, said that is exactly what he expected for hp based on the changes.

[@b00stedrust]

@@MustangLifestyleTV the gearing is definitely longer than the Honda's, the Honda weighs less, Much less...and it consistently put down 1.6-1.8 60's and it traps nearly the same as your over 1000lb heavier, almost same WHP mustang????.... with your weight that gearing, no way 125mph...This doesn't sound odd to you....Given those facts in one statement put in front of you? My mind is saying no way. Like I said dyno gotta be reading low then...whats that thing weigh anyways?

[@madmod]

@@b00stedrust 420whp is about 485 at the crank. That power level in a stock weight mustang GT is good for 11.0s all day. Like nearly perfect. That's good driving.

[@HashMaster1776]

You should do a real nice fuel system for that car

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

Have one sitting in the garage ready for 1400 :)

[@wesleymarkham3343]

Gears?

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

3.27

[@Contreras-z4e]

Look at Andrew Lavender KZbin channel he has a Fast AF 2v

[@ZFighters7]

How much psi?

[@ferch3186]

Did you need to buy a k member to fir the kit on your car?

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

Yes

[@ferch3186]

@@MustangLifestyleTV What one did You use on your car

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

Upr

[@ferch3186]

@@MustangLifestyleTV thanks for the information I will be turboing my car in the next few days. 🤙

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

no prob

[@Reypadd]

That torque is stupid high, though.

[@badazz99]

460-470 whp...530tq

[@bambam23406]

I’m gonna guess 420 just for memes but I kinda feel like it’s going to be around

[@nateonfireball]

Man send it Andrew! Rev it out to 7700 rpm see what it makes!

[@bambam23406]

Real funny my guy

[@slayr2256]

I don’t even think the car will make it to 7700, I don’t even think the bama handhelds will let you! Lmao

[@cainadkins3985]

It makes swiss cheese engine block

[@darrinshaw1662]

Is the motor stock with stock internals

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

Yes

[@donalderdbrink647]

From what I heard you can get these kind of numbers with no power adder if you take an early 4.6 non Pi short block up to 98 and then take a 99 and up Pi (Power Improved) heads and intake and bolting them on the non Pi shortblock and get right about 400 hp.any info on this?

[@joshc606]

Donald Erdbrink 300rwhp is possible with that setup not 400. That setup bumps up the compression to make more power.

[@karlhopkins713]

@@joshc606 Just heads cams fbo you can see 350+whp

[@_carnivore_joe1520]

@@karlhopkins713 2 generous.. I had a 02 Saleen. Car only had 30k miles on it so barely broke in. Did heads, stage 3 cams and intake and only seen 320 on a happy dyno. 350+ is a stretch with just basic bolt on's. Not saying it cant be done, but its going to take some work.

[@karlhopkins713]

@@_carnivore_joe1520 I should have said stage 3 heads and cams

[@rheser]

I reckon around 420rwhp if it was making 300rwhp before

[@jacobn7597]

Is this a built tr3650

[@MustangLifestyleTV]

stock

[@bigdaddytrucker8312]

Not bad at all 👍

[@steveparlier9282]

See ford makes less hp and still goes 10’s wow I bet those demons are salty lol esp knowing they use that fuel as well and 840hp to only go a lil faster lol at a 9.65 lol I bet u out that much hp in that stang and it will be doing 8’s maybe wow good job bro on your build