Go to squarespace.com/Chelsea & save 10% off your first website or domain with code “Chelsea"
@atruceforbruce53883 ай бұрын
Your talking about apple..... it would cost more than a teala to buy. 😂.
@morvegil3 ай бұрын
I thought apple is only dominant in the USA
@Rivenworld3 ай бұрын
I absolutely hate the vertical format for video, it always feels like I am missing a huge chunk of the scene.
@ivonned323 ай бұрын
Oh no vertical for video? 😮😢
@stedoesstuff3 ай бұрын
Their camera would probably create files which can't be viewed on PC or android
@HwL013 ай бұрын
Nah, their RAW files right now works everywhere. I doubt it will change from DNG file
@jmp6223 ай бұрын
Or iPad
@shApYT3 ай бұрын
Airdrop only. No folder structure.
@ikoyDaPnoy3 ай бұрын
Apple LOVES proprietary stuff like that. They want you trapped in their world. Then somehow since they have such a huge market, other companies mimic them ... like built-in batteries and built-in SD cards ... i hate that trend.
@Roar.3 ай бұрын
you still live in 2004? I have never had a problem since then.
@danieleppelsheimer92733 ай бұрын
The iPhone is their CAMERA
@sandybarrie55263 ай бұрын
Apple boast more photos have been taken on iPhones that all other camera combined. (a bit questionable)
@gavthane3 ай бұрын
@@sandybarrie5526 not really that questionable at all, and I’d say that’s probably true by a massive margin.
@noctwice3 ай бұрын
@@sandybarrie5526If posted and uploaded to social media is the measure it might be true. Though Apple iPhones only make up 20-25% of the smartphone market worldwide so gap is probably closing.
@RyanPerrella3 ай бұрын
It HAS BEEN their camera, but, what does one look like when they get sensors 20x the size of the current ones they buy from Sony, I’d sure love to see it.
@RyanPerrella3 ай бұрын
@@gavthaneI agree with you, I think iPhone gave may people the spark for Photography, those who would never have invested 3 grand into a body and lens and all that goes with it, instead they have a pocket camera and now some incredible photographic minds are photographers now because the camera is ACCESSIBLE. Now I want a FullFrame version please.
@leo_hoang3 ай бұрын
I’m all for it… but let them tackle the Fuji X100 social media market… People are spending a lot for the trendy Fuji for their JPG’s and ease of use… if Apple did something within their eco system but have their processing, fixed lens, small, social media friendly… they would kill it…
@yuka-youtube3 ай бұрын
it's called iphone
@leo_hoang3 ай бұрын
@@yuka-youtube there’s always one eh… If you want to get particular, then add aps-c or full frame sensor size to the list of specs…
@msaunds833 ай бұрын
Maybe Apple would be the first to do a circular sensor. Do V/H at the same time, so you can get both and then process in post. Cover all formats in one shot/video.
@mochikoren3 ай бұрын
Insta360 Go 3/3s has this, it’s one is the best features of the camera!
@cineffect3 ай бұрын
We need square lenses, not a circular sensor.
@jacques4242423 ай бұрын
Just choose 1:1 aspect ratio and crop later. Panasonic made it possible to choose several aspect ratios without giving up pixel count on its now-discontinued LX-series cameras. Not quite what you're asking for, but nifty nonetheless.
@cineffect3 ай бұрын
@@jacques424242 The only aspect ratio I am interested in is 16:9.
@AronjAnderson3 ай бұрын
You guys got me excited for an apple camera, I want one.
@francischang3 ай бұрын
You should revisit the smartphone vs full frame image quality test. It has definitely not been my experience that smartphones can compete with full frame in low light photography.
@DieHardEddieEdwards3 ай бұрын
Or with moving subjects.
@christophpawlowskimusic2133 ай бұрын
They cant even compete wit apsc. Physics are hard to overcome
@JimmyPifPaf3 ай бұрын
@@christophpawlowskimusic213 and M43 is not far from Apsc..
@1970rsc3 ай бұрын
Smartphones can complete with full frames in limited circumstances. Phone cams generally need good lighting, sophisticated software to produce effects that a normal camera can produce manual exposure settings, and can’t be enlarged without showing issues. If you take well lit pics with wide depth of field and view on a phone screen, phone cams can absolutely compete.
@christophpawlowskimusic2133 ай бұрын
@@1970rsc ok but then its edited phone pic vs raw camera footage
@kamilfilipowicz3 ай бұрын
Short answer: No. Long answer: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
@framerate3x33 ай бұрын
"Here at apple, we got rid of the external battery on the camera. Changing batteries is for chumps. As our batteries age, the camera will throttle its maximum framerate, so we can protect our bottom line. Battery service starts at $899." Yeah no thanks.
@TrekCZ3 ай бұрын
Of course built in soldered storage, starting at 64GB next upgrade 128GB +500$, 512GB +2500$, 1TB +6000$, lifespan 200TBW
@williambuford61363 ай бұрын
EU laws kick in 2025 that will force replaceable batteries...
@slave0ne3 ай бұрын
@@williambuford6136 A lot of people (like me) that live in the US wish we lived in a functional society. The US refuses to protect its people, especially if it compromises the profit potential of the companies who can now legally purchase politicians (Citizens United, just one example). The Supreme Court here just gutted another significant piece of legislation (Chevron) that used to allow government agencies to regulate different industries, the environment, etc. We are a failed state. The next four years will be very painful.
@superzero42503 ай бұрын
Do Androids and Pixel phones have replaceable batteries… 🤔
@jacques4242423 ай бұрын
Battery service for iPhones doesn't start at $899. Nor does an iPhone's frame rate slow over time. FUDster.
@snoopywalker18813 ай бұрын
Tony hit the nail on the head. Making “3D Spatial” photos for the Vision Pro is a real opportunity. A good camera that does this must be n the works. Demo the Vision Pro in the APple Store and see for yourself. Baseball - your 3d view is right next to the 1st baseman, Mountain Climbing, Alicia Keys In the recording studio feels like your in the room.
@Raima888s3 ай бұрын
No, it will be $7k+ for the camera and lenses will be $5k+ each
@clabart3 ай бұрын
😂😂 sure! If I go to Condotti street at Bulgari's to buy a piece of jewellery for my wife it costs me less
@zulfika_3 ай бұрын
and the shutter button is sold separately for $999
@Raima888s3 ай бұрын
@@zulfika_ optional $50 micro fibre cloth to keep the body clean of finger print marks 🤣
@clabart3 ай бұрын
Lawyers will move from Wetzlar to Cupertino
@CuriousTinkering3 ай бұрын
@@zulfika_this feels like it’s going to really happen like their $999 wheels 😂
@ModelSensation3 ай бұрын
This is overdue. Canon, Sony, Nikon, Fuji etc has refused to update the interfaces and software by gatekeeping developers from making applications. DJI drone interface is light years ahead of our crippled camera interfaces and capabilities.
@TheArtist4413 ай бұрын
Apple possibly doing this is very intriguing indeed. I always thought that if cell phone makers were getting close to FF or APC mirrorless camera quality with their small sensors squeezing every drop of performance out of those sensors, FF and APC camera makers could just take that sensor technology and make bigger versions with way better quality. Now, if someone like Apple made bigger sensors and lenses AND apply their computational photography tech to it - that could be pure gold
@BillyGrayNC3 ай бұрын
I was working for Sony Ericsson (and, prior to that, Ericsson) when the original iPhone was being developed. The industry didn't take it especially seriously for many reasons: smart phones were only interesting to enterprise customers, apps needed to be developed in-house, Apple had no idea about how to through type testing, Apple had no idea how to go through customer acceptance and the carriers would force them to put hard green and red buttons on the phone. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. People who have come into cellphones after the iPhone have no idea how different the industry looked before that. There's no reason they couldn't do the same with a camera - assuming people want a camera that is grounded in the Apple ecosystem and oriented towards content creation. Knowing Apple (and the AI race in general), I'd read the T&C's carefully if you're proprietary about your photos.
@geoffreyconnor45893 ай бұрын
The Camera market is already too crowded. Apple should stick to what they do best - computers and the iPhone.
@IFrancyISantosI3 ай бұрын
they should concentrate getting macOS usable with a touch screen
@Shahaaim3 ай бұрын
Maybe computational photography could be a thing?
@TrekCZ3 ай бұрын
Definitely, mirrorless camera market does not have so big market gap, so Apple would have to go for jugular and try to take everything. Samsung left it because there is not probably so much money to make there ...
@SachaSommer3 ай бұрын
The phone market is already too crowded. Apple should stick to what they do best: computers and iPods.
@dsimon9s293 ай бұрын
That is what I thought about the cell phone market before the iPhone was released. The camera industry is complacent at the moment. There are a lot of areas in the business, which could be improved. T&C mentioned a few of them at the beginning of the video. Apple comes in, targets those areas for improvement (like they did in the cell phone business) they could be successful. It is a bigger market than than the $3500 thing from hell they are making.
@glennnorthrop80803 ай бұрын
Way back in 1994, I purchased the first Apple Camera: The QuickTake 100. It was $750, shot 640 x 480 pictures (up to 8), and you had to use Apple’s QuickTake software to get them off the camera. It was a horrible little camera, but was the first Digital Camera that was available to the consumer. My tech marketing company shot the Seattle Space Needle with the camera, and also built the Space Needles first website. Apples iPhone cameras are so good for the average photographer, It will be interesting to see if Apple plans a serious entry into the photo market with a freestanding camera.
@Bladeclaw001003 ай бұрын
I wonder what mount they will use. Will they have their own or use one like Blackmagic camera does. Another thing is instead of physical dials, they may try touch scrolling dials. You use swipe your finger to change, this keeps the camera smooth looking and keeps the versatility, except when wearing gloves. They will have to add Siri to change your settings and since it's for a market that wants more control than a smart phone, they will have to have lots of manual features while dropping the PASM. They will have you turn on or off which items you want auto or manual. The camera will turn on silently as you pick it up. And stay with an auto on feature disabled. The camera may have a large lens with a few smaller lenses on the side for computational enhancements for low light. And if it's well weather sealed effectively, it might even be waterproof. Blackmagic pocket cinema camera was a really slick futuristic camera, so it might look more like that. But for the consumer it might do something like what DJI did with their Pocket camera. My big question is if they will be making their own lenses or will you be able to use third party lenses and if it is third party, who will it be. Sony, Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Panasonic, Leica, Arri. lol.
@skesinis3 ай бұрын
I said some years ago, that Apple was going to make a camera at some point, since the main selling point for every smart phone has become its camera, but I’ve been laughed at… Not that such camera already exists, but it makes sense as you mentioned in so many points in your video, even if it’s going to be crazy expensive.
@Jake123993 ай бұрын
Are you still using three Canon RPs? I would love a video on how to set that up because they have a record limit.
@claptrappers3 ай бұрын
I agree more with Chelsea; they'll bring something to the professional market for professional blogging and multicamera streaming and filmmaking, get into bed with a lens manufacturer-Canon, Sony, or whatever-and share their mount. It'll have native Integration with Siri, iCloud, and Final Cut. A.I. sound will remove the need for wireless mics at a certain distance. It'll be something that doesn't look easy to hold initially, a black box as a solid unit with no buttons, dials or switches with touchscreen controls, you'll need to buy grips to suit the type of creative you are. There are very few inputs, probably just USB-C and an inbuilt battery. It'll have a decent enough microphone but be prepared to get some additional dongles if you want something better. FCP and the Cloud will sync external audio for you automatically. The whole point is that all your peripheral devices connect wirelessly, and third parties will create cages, shells, cases or power packs as they always do. Some professional technology will be used in the future to help sell 'Pro iPhones', but that market won't be interested in a dedicated camera.
@simonbarnes71243 ай бұрын
Can I just say working for Fujifilm as I do, the smart phone has made it ever so easy to take photos, however most people over 40 have no idea how to upload their images wirelessly from their phones to the kiosks. The technology is too complicated for them whether you use an app or scan QR codes. It is a massive problem plaguing photo labs everywhere at this time. Technology has surpassed 80% of the population due to the iPhone and android technology. Print sales are down massively due to this problem created by smartphone cameras.
@ronyedin3 ай бұрын
Imagine a 24-megapixel camera created through a collaboration between Apple and Sony. It would feature Find My iPhone or AirTag integration, AirDrop for photo sharing, direct uploads to Facebook and Instagram, and automatic iCloud backups. Equipped with Sony imaging sensors and eye autofocus, it would deliver high-quality images and have a simplified iPhone-Apple menu system. Notably, Sony already manufactures camera sensors for iPhones, highlighting their established partnership. Apple has already done collaborations like this, such as with Beats headphones.
@DennisKapatos3 ай бұрын
Tony do you remember the Sony QX series "cameras"? It was a hockey puck sized camron that was essentially a sensor and a lens mount that you paired with your phone. I could see Apple do something like that but I think they would not do interchangeable lens. Anyway, I hope someone disrupts the camera industry again the way Samsung tried to.
@robertharvey25803 ай бұрын
This is fun to think about, and I’ve sometimes wondered if Apple would make a camera as well. However, I’m just not sure if it makes business sense. Apple has done a lot of marketing that presents the iPhone as a tool for photography. An Apple camera would contradict all of that. I thinks it’s more likely that Apple will try to get a larger sensor in an existing product, like the iPhone or iPad.
@MTNRanger3 ай бұрын
I agree they will target the pro market first with a fairly high price. I would get one. I have Apple products (iphones/ipads/appletvs) but also strictly a PC user. As an aside, I'm hoping the iPhone 16 telephoto lens isn't as compromised as the 15.
@RyanFagan_RealEstateАй бұрын
The biggest problem with non phone cameras is the lack of or difficulty of getting the content to your phone/internet/social media quickly
@3dtrip8703 ай бұрын
What censor size do you think this will be? I wonder if they go too big if the computational work will be throttled? MFT size?
@zean_moore3 ай бұрын
The obvious play here for the consumer level is continuity camera, for facetime, zoom etc on appletv and your home office. It's a glorified webcam/actioncam with a battery and wireless capabilities, but also usbc for your ipad and studio display. Then since it is comparable to iphone quality, and folks are happy enough with that for multicam into fcp on ipad, you can get a set of 3 or 4 to build out your studio. iPad + Apple Camera kit and you're set for your youtube channel, podcast, livestreams. No screens, all controlled via iPhone, iPad, Mac, or (2nd Gen) Vision Pro. One potential is that they don't have spacial video built in (single fixed lens only), but a special mount or holder can pair two camera to create spacial content, and you can stream two pairs (or one stream from AVP) to fcp, and boom, live-streaming spacial video, all native apple to vision pro users. I feel like this master plan is out in the open, and I'm glad you called it out so early. I'd assume we see this launch with the low end vision pro in 2025/2026. Price Point $750-$1000 ea.
@TheBigNegative-PhotoChannel3 ай бұрын
Can't wait for the Apple camera to make Leica cameras look like a bargain.
@ulyssesnathanialowen38313 ай бұрын
Leica's are bargains compared to the others !!!
@markwardonwords3 ай бұрын
You guys are great. Good judgment. I have 20k subscribers and do weekly videos, and two years ago I got a Sony α7 IV. I absolutely love it-except for the iPhone app. It’s bizarre to me how finicky it is to film myself, something that I and other KZbinrs do all the time. If Apple made that simple, I think I’d pay the money. That one pain point is enough to get me out of the otherwise excellent Sony ecosystem.
@cjlevinsonphotography3 ай бұрын
I think if Apple did make a camera they would want it to be very sleek and a simple user experience, those would be their design priorities. I’ve always thought the Leica T looks quite like the kind of camera Apple could make - very sleek and minimalist, with no viewfinder but an iPhone’s screen and processing power behind it. Something that size you could also hold vertically or horizontally very comfortably. I’d think it would be pretty expensive, maybe not Leica prices but say on par with the A7RV and Z8 etc. One with a fixed lens would make sense too to go after the influencer and X100V crowds
@mains89133 ай бұрын
Front and back screen, very sophisticated LiDAR, no E/VF, minimal but functional buttons, Siri integration as a remote, air drop, maybe integration for base apps like instagram, 1" or 1.5" sensor (definitely not M43 as it is very related to other brands), very high framerate video, maybe AI used for in camera editing of photos
@pauls1ngh3 ай бұрын
I’m all for it. Sony can license their AF to Apple. Fuji can license their film sims. Electronic ND filters. Log & RAW recording. BMD launches standalone iPhone/iPad apps for colour, edit & fairlight. Good potential for disruption.
@georgewidmeriv7012 ай бұрын
I can see a collaboration with Leica for the lens for a “Pro camera”
@stevesvanderpool86533 ай бұрын
$125 a month subscription fee for the entry level. $165 a month for the family account. $250 for the professionals and that one comes with Beats and Apple Music for a month.
@PetetheCat-13 ай бұрын
SONY makes camera sensors for iPhones
@rpmorrisjr3 ай бұрын
How about… A system with a “front” and “back” like Hasselblad. The front is ergonomically pleasing with a full array of interchangeable lenses. The “back” is the iPhone. It snaps in and communicates with the “front” by NFC and all controls are right there on the screen etc. The “front” could be relatively inexpensive and require a changed form maybe every few iterations of iPhone; the lenses would be forever just like any camera now and of course the iPhone could continue to update as it does now (occasionally requiring an upgraded front).
@callumjohnson94333 ай бұрын
Samsung galaxy s4 zoom became a flop which is a shame. Samsung approached this idear first and I loved the idear. A camera that had phone features rather than a phone with camera features. I'd love to see a camera with optical zoom and a micro 4 3rds or bigger sensor with android phone capabilities. I'll buy one tomorrow
@chilecayenne3 ай бұрын
The iPad multi-cam thing looks really great. HOWEVER, you have to *rent* your FCPX software on the iPad to use that. I dropped Adobe like a hot rock many years back when they went to the *rental* model...I refuse to rent my software....so, no FCPX rental for me. I have a feeling that BlackMagic design will have a free version of that out soon enough.....
@timwingnut3 ай бұрын
I can't wait for a full-frame apple camera
@knulerabc3 ай бұрын
Could we see a square sensor? It would make it much easier to create content that can be cropped both for social media and also for more traditional use. I agree with Tony that we will see a camera at maybe up to 1500$. I think it has to be small tho. Then Apple would hit a bigger market of content creators that want a step up from the phone, and maybe not necessarily want to spend several thousands of dollars for a pro camera. I work as a communications adviser in Norway and can see the value in having a camera that you can take a picture or a video with, immediately edit it on the same device and then upload it to social media. It would give a much faster workflow without sacrificing image quality. Going live without a fuzz is also valuable I think.
@okaro65953 ай бұрын
The 55% is in the US. Worldwide the share is much less. It is about 20% of te sales and 28% of phones used.
@RemyOrtiz3 ай бұрын
I think the key innovation is likely going to be a rotating sensor, one that goes from landscape to portrait without twisting the body itself. That way, you can record your vertical content without contorting your arms. I feel like Apple would do this.
@TungstenOvergaard3 ай бұрын
Johnny Ive was already working with Leica on some special editions. And they looked a bit Appleish.
@WoolWhichReds3 ай бұрын
I’m thinking of pulling my FM2 n out. But where to get fujifilm 64
@PatrickRambles3 ай бұрын
My iPhone is a camera and it works great because it's a computer. I don't think they have any business in the actual camera segment.
@ChateauScholt3 ай бұрын
One thing that would be awesome, but could also be dine by traditional camera companies is proper WiFi integration, turn the camera on and it shows up as drive on your computer, no need for cable or memory cards.
@MaximoJoshua3 ай бұрын
they literally announced two different cameras and workflows for spatial video and immersive video Canon announced a lens or spatial video (3d), which you will be able to edit in Final Cut, and upload to Vimeo Blackmagic has the Ursa Cine Immersive, which is going to do immersive video (vr 180), you'll be able to edit it in Resolve, and then package it using Apple Compressor... both of those cameras were announced at WWDC
@tommanseau62773 ай бұрын
What I'd like to see is a collaboration between the Japanese camera companies and Google. Imagine the GUI from a Pixel, the controls of your favorite camera manufacturer, and the combined picture processing of those companies. I can easily think of a dozen permutations of this kind of collaboration. Imagine a camera body that's easy to use but could use a legacy lens system. Heck, I can't figure out why Panasonic hasn't swallowed their period, partnered with Google, and made an absolutely killer M43 system. Get compact size, a plethora of good lenses at affordable prices, and overcome the smaller sensor size with some great computational photography. But as has been made clear by a few creators, Panasonic can be prickly.
@ProcrastinatorsAnon3 ай бұрын
Idk about "without the manual".... I can dig my way through Windows or Android to find the settings I want to change, but an iphone or an ipad is not as intuitive...not even after I've looked up how to do it.
@TSGEnt3 ай бұрын
btw, do you remember the quicktake 100 and 200?
@funknick3 ай бұрын
Something to keep in mind is that Apple is working very closely with Black Magic and Canon to create first-class software integration for Vision Pro 3D stereo video recording. Is it possible them hiring your friend is simply to have a camera engineer on staff as the stakeholder for their software teams and also as a key person for camera companies to interface with so they feel they're talking to a camera tech and not some random Apple exec/software-engineer? The camera market feels like it's becoming quite niche. What would the market/profit reasons be for Apple to jump into this market?
@batuhancokmar73303 ай бұрын
Sad thing is, every innovation mentioned here is actually very easy for Nikon/Canon to implement. They just don't do it. Terrible screens, archaic UI schemes, terrible connectivity*. I really want Apple to make a camera. This might finally force big manufacturers to act, just like M1 macs forces MS and Intel/AMD to up their game. Hate Apple for their many "weird" policies, but they are a necessary evil in this world. *Rant here: Nikon has, in theory, very impressive connectivity. Take the photo, it automagically appear on my phone via Snapbridge, and automatically upload to Nikon Image Space; as both hassle-free backup and I can easily create an album to share with friends; from which they can download photos or just view them and maybe download ones they like. In practice, snapbridge only auto-downloads 2MP photos (actually 1.7MP) to my phone. WHY? This "artificial" limitation makes Snapbridge completely useless. Also uploading these roughly thumbnail-sized photos to cloud isn't a backup, so that functionality becomes useless as well. Just give an option to auto-download original JPGs or RAWs. I know it will be slower, but why not at least provide the option? There is no technical limitation here (snapbridge is capable of getting full-sized JPGs manually), just very ill-concieved marketing decisions. No, 1618x1080 is NOT enough even for social media. Because a) some social media like Facebook support 2048px, Whatsapp support 4096px. and b) people like to crop/rotate their photos. Then comes the Nikon Image space. If I send an album to someone, its works on PC/laptop but photos are NOT downloadable from phone. Forces to download the app or forces downloading one picture at a time, downsized to just 2MP. WHY? I can't ask my friends (or my clients if I were a pro) to download an app and register just the recieve their photos, this artificial limitation force me to use wetransfer instead. Again there is no technical limitation here (because I can select desktop site on my phone's browser and download photos then), just a terrible marketing decision. Two tiny, artificially created problems and how's connectivity advanced from an 12 year old D5100 to a brand-new Z7 mk II? Actually, nothing happened. I still upload them to a PC via a card reader, and send to my friends via wetransfer. Needless to say, wireless camera control is also terrible. 80% of functions available in a 3rd party app (qDslrDashboard) isn't present on Nikon's own native app. One guy doing reverse engineering in his basement can do better than Nikon's whole software department. So yeah, I do want Apple to make a camera. Not that I'd ever buy one, just so they can show Nikon/Canon how its done in year 2024.
@yega3k3 ай бұрын
Never ever even thought of this and yet it makes so much sense!
@MaximoJoshua3 ай бұрын
I definitely think they should make a camera, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if they partnered with BlackMagic to do it. I would imagine it would be: - full frame as getting a bigger sensor is the entire point - L-Mount because it's the most open standard - powered by an iphone chip, and uses a variant of iOS - can use cellular data - uses Apple Log, ProRes, and ProRAW - Adds a bunch of computational photography stuff powered by Apple Neural Engine - either 4k or 6k video - probably 48mp that pixel bins to 12mp they've already shown they can incorporate the iPhone into their productions, and have done it multiple times, I'm just guessing that anything they wish they had on that they would add.
@HezyTech3 ай бұрын
As a production company owner I would buy one. Apple would make things ridiculously easy to use it within our already established eco system. I’m ready for it
@SomeUnremarkableGuy3 ай бұрын
ridiculously easy to use? I didn't know you need Apple to tell you how to press a shutter button to take a photo on a camera.
@TrekCZ3 ай бұрын
@@SomeUnremarkableGuy recent cameras have very rich settings where some of these settings are working only when other settings are active or disabled when some settings are active. Even professionals make mistakes every now and then. Then there are different sets for photo, video, s&q. It is difficult to remember where settings are, etc.
@DieHardEddieEdwards3 ай бұрын
@@TrekCZIt’s complicated because you have complete control.
@christenelia3 ай бұрын
could the iphone be attached to the camera / lens by magsafe and act as the screen? 🤔 but it doesn’t feel like the apple way
@fvsch3 ай бұрын
If we're making crazy predictions, here's mine for an Apple camera's sensor: they will design a wide-format APS-H sensor just to be different from everyone else. 😂
@ForTheLoveOfSuits3 ай бұрын
The Hasselblad Xd series has a very Apple aesthetic. I think it's very close to how they would design a camera.
@E6MND3 ай бұрын
They already do, it’s called the Leica Q3. If Apple made a camera, they’d have to respect how it’s done right now; high quality glass, real bokeh, low processing, add smart features such as Find My. I probably still buy one though.
@TSGEnt3 ай бұрын
Interesting thought. But doesn't Apple already make a camera? Let's say they do make a dedicated camera. Wouldn't it be ironic if it didn't connect to internet much like all the other cameras out there?
@RyanPerrella3 ай бұрын
Great discussion you two, I love how you look at the developments then use your astute minds to predict where the path is going. I really liked your piece on DJI a few months ago and I would sure love to know what an Apple FF camera would be like, not just a Leica clone, but with APPLE LIKE FEATURES in a piece of hardware like the Sony A7CR. Nice job guys, way to look towards the future and do it with references to the past to guide future potentials.
@abfutrell3 ай бұрын
Having dials is nice while cycling in a large Critical Mass group ride. Nikon Zfc + Voigtlander 23mm is the perfect combo for light weight and powerful.
@RageStudios3 ай бұрын
I would want an apple camera so bad!
@Squatle3 ай бұрын
I could see it being the most mixed bag product ever. Image quality, connectivity, ecosystem integration, security, geotagging would be amazing and I’d love it. On the other hand, I’d assume prices being 2.3x more expensive any Sony full-frame camera, no tactile buttons and no true manual mode.
@michaelenos86903 ай бұрын
Think Leica Q series with connectivity. That would be something
@bobdilg28383 ай бұрын
I think another likely scenario is that Apple partners with an existing manufacturer to incorporate the Apple operating system. It could include even more computational features than the OM-1, and also the features T&C mention in this video. I don’t want a standalone Apple camera, but I’d love to have the option of using an existing interchangeable lens system with all of the computational and communication features.
@PieterBreda3 ай бұрын
Outside of the USA, android is king
@ezequitor3 ай бұрын
I also have no dobuts that it will have at least 1 subscription based service that you will not be able to opt out
@RicanStudio3 ай бұрын
2:23 can’t do live cutting unless something changed… don’t know if you can stream (because no one talked about streaming and it didn’t make sense if you can’t cut live), so just Multicam. But point taken!
@PatFarrellKTM3 ай бұрын
I'm still waiting for Tony's $500 box that is a high end interchangable lens camera.
@DRMadeIt3 ай бұрын
99% sure if Apple did something like this it would be something that uses your iPhone for the processing power.
@roninatlanta3 ай бұрын
A couple of thoughts... To begin, I agree, since Apple introduced 'computational photography' I've thought the technology needs its own hardware where it's not constrained by the iPhone package. There is no telling how many videos (on YT) where people compare iPhone images with proper pro-level camera images and the iPhone images stand with or exceed proper camera images. As 'computational photography' continues to evolve (improve) it will be constrained by what the Apple engineers can pack into the iPhone package.
@pericoolseby3 ай бұрын
Great video. I like your videos guys, but the studio lighting and the exposure is distracting to me. My opinion is that it could be improved. Good Luck!
@logtothebase23 ай бұрын
Im wondering about Apple carplay for cameras, a software product that sits in the cloud and on device, and on camera to manage the workflow, and ultimately a camera OS that runs natively on say your Canon R or Nikon Z type camera. One thing we could see the back of is exposure values like F stop and shutter speed, instead adjusting background defocus, subject movement and brightness.
@getabey3 ай бұрын
All these things make sense for a content-creation camera with a non-interchangeable lens, similar to old point-and-shoot models but with advanced capabilities like 2x, 5x, and 10x optical zoom. Such a camera could serve as a high-quality video capturing device, addressing the limitations of current phone sensors. However, creating a full-frame, interchangeable lens camera seems beyond the immediate requirements. Instead, Apple might consider acquiring specialized companies, similar to how Nikon acquired RED, to enhance their expertise and technology in this area.
@wolf_pup56203 ай бұрын
How do I care for my Sony camera in the humidity
@xeroforhire3 ай бұрын
Chelsea says that she likes a tactile experience and then you guys show a video clip of my dream camera
@dsimon9s293 ай бұрын
Thanks for posting. Just imagine an Apple camera in the 35mm format, with Apple's image processing capabilities, Apple security, with a 28mm, 35mm, and/or 50mm lens. How about a Apple like touch screen??? Asking less than $1k for a camera from Apple is optimistic. Who would be the target demographic?
@burneshollyman26213 ай бұрын
I agree. I have been saying this for years and have been amazed that no camera company has licensed or co-ventured with them since the electronics in all digital cameras are crude compared to what the iPhone can do. Sadly, that will never happen. But even Leica and Fuji seem to have a secret licensing thing with Panasonic, so you never know. Nah, I am just kidding myself. I'm glad you raised this thought experiment, though. The more significant point is the question: in this day and age, how can camera companies whose sole focus is photography be so far behind on the software curves that Apple and Samsung are killing? When you consider that the camera is just one of the many things the smartphone does besides taking pictures, you admire in awe.
@danielsinn81643 ай бұрын
There is a brand new camera that shoots primarily vertical images. The Pentax 17 film camera lol. There would be obvious applications for a computational photography pro grade camera, but a lot of people are sick of the over processed, heavily modified images coming out of smart phones now days.
@Z_EOS3 ай бұрын
What if they come up with an actual camera module as those sony QX10 in 2013 clip on cameras? You don't need whole device, just the better lens and bigger sensor
@petercharles66523 ай бұрын
Talking about Apple charging for storage, they lost me as a client several years ago after I bought my first large Ipad pro due to their obscene costs for both ram and ssd storage space for their Iphones, laptops, Ipads, etc. Now I am a happy camper with an LG windows 11 pro machine and top Google Pixel Pro phone. The Laptop alone cost about 1/3 the price of a Macbook Pro . It is loaded with 32gig ram and two terabytes of storage for good video editing on location. My Google Pixel, fully loaded, cost one third less than the comparable Iphone and has many more editing features than the same generation Iphone, with many features added along the way. Recently reviewing laptop options, Apple was charging about $200 for an extra 256gb of storage upgrade from base on both their Laptops and Ipads, which is just crazy for people that have more serious requirements for usage...
@richardlouis-pierre86073 ай бұрын
They'll probably come with a dual lens pretty early to make Vision Pro content. So, I'm thinking dual 8-12k sensor or some crazy 17k 2.4:1 aspect ratio sensor that can take both a traditional FF lens or dual lens.
@morvegil3 ай бұрын
What about samsung
@jaymills17203 ай бұрын
Without a doubt, if they made dedicated cameras it would get my attention and I’d probably get it. Would love a Ricoh sized option and a small body mirrorless
@smithandshortdogs3 ай бұрын
7:35 It is pronounced klud (to rhyme with mud) g Tony... Hence, Chelsea's confusion.
@bobyoung64463 ай бұрын
Like fudge? No. Here in Iowa, it is a u sound like clue, flu, tune. Clue__dge.
@michaelenos86903 ай бұрын
British pronunciation, American it is pronounced as in a double o as in moon with a final J sound
@theblanklogo3 ай бұрын
As an American, I've never heard it pronounced with and OO.
@tonygreenwoodN103 ай бұрын
The word is...kludge (with a less seen "kluge" spelling variant)...just look it up, it's in every online dictionary... US (sounds like "huge") and British (sounds like "fudge") pronunciation can differ though...naturally the British version is more authentic 🙂
@mattdownn3 ай бұрын
They could only make a camera if it didn’t interfere with phone sales, so I’d imagine that it would have some super benefits of having an iPhone alongside it. Also don’t know if you guys have seen but the iPhone 16 leaks shows it having a dedicated shutter button!
@pilarpsp1273 ай бұрын
Apple should buy some camera company. Then use their camera know how and add own chips into that camera.
@Liamitis1233 ай бұрын
I always thought it was kludgy (cluh-dgy). I learned something new today. I don't think I like the actual pronunciation though as much as the way I imagined it.
@BigSlimyBlob3 ай бұрын
No. No they should not. It'll be obscenely expensive, require a bunch of proprietary gear, spy on you, be designed to slow down or break after two years, will be impossible to repair, etc. I genuinely don't know why anyone buys anything from that awful, awful company.
@cvaguam3 ай бұрын
The first digital camera I used was an Apple Quicktake. The photo was good enough for the front page of the newspaper.
@pembridgehouse3 ай бұрын
I remember seeing one at a camera club when they first came out.I think I still have a sales brochure somewhere.
@abhinaybuiss3 ай бұрын
It was designed by Fujifilm with a Fujinon lens(?)
@qizhang50423 ай бұрын
The most Apple-style camera is Leica T/TL/TL2. Leica is the most Apple-like company. So, if Apple ever wants to make a camera and be successful, their best choice is to buy Leica.
@jscottbradshaw3 ай бұрын
I think Apple should make a dock that looks like a mirrorless body that adds hard buttons and dials for shutter and f Stops - and partner with a camera company to add external lens support through the usb c connection.
@iggytse3 ай бұрын
Samsung had compact cameras that ran Android. The concept was good but execution was not as slick as what Apple could do running iOS on a compact with a real zoom lens. What I would want is to have native camera control while live streaming from Instagram or KZbin to zoom in and out. At the moment with iPhone you can’t select which camera to use when streaming. You can’t adjust the expose when streaming.
@lionheart44243 ай бұрын
Apple: Here is our new camera with AI, encryption and computational photography. Sony: Hold my beer! Fujifilm: We are still out of stuck of our x100(?)! Canon: We provide lenses for iMount! Nikon: OK, give us half a decade to integrate mobile stuff into our Z mount cameras!
@patrick80353 ай бұрын
I’m with Chelsea re the pricing - Apple always goes high end to start, then as they work out whether the market is there, they will start introducing it for mass consumption. I still don’t think Apple will make one, but essentially if they were to make one, then it would have been the ZX1 from Zeiss.
@jserenity3 ай бұрын
I was shooting with DJI osmo pocket 3 and I was surprised that the iphone 14 video was able to shoot more rebust than it. Like I dont need to change any settings or put an nd filter to have a video from a dark cave (with a torch at lease) to a blazing sun on a 12 noon.
@ulyssesnathanialowen38313 ай бұрын
u dont "shoot" with either of these .. u hold them up and point !!
@dlc11193 ай бұрын
I'd be happy if they upgraded the Photos application on my Mac.
@a.tevetoglu33663 ай бұрын
Sony should buy Apple. All problems solved.
@giovannispinosa1823 ай бұрын
It'll definitely have to be an ILC. Who would make their sensor? Sony? If Sony, would there be some kind a arrangement to use the E-mount? Or maybe, force them not to use the E-mount? Perhaps, a move to the more open L-mount? Insanity would be to develop a proprietary lens mount.